 could nevertheless thwart that prosecution simply because some of the evidence involves official acts, really, I think, is hard to square with basic principles of evidentiary law. And it's really, I think, going to make it impossible, even in cases where we might all agree that the former president at issue ought to be prosecuted for prosecutors to make their case. We'll see what happens in the New York case. I think Jonathan's probably right. But to me, that more than this substantive immunity holding is,