 Now, it went so badly that it sort of seems like it was a bad bet. But I'm guessing that was their calculus. A lot of people think it was because if he did so badly, they'd have time to kick him off the ballot. I think that's proven to be false because he did as bad as possible. It was the worst debate performance in American history. So if the intention was to remove him, then he'd be gone by now because every day he's still on the ballot is a detriment to whoever the ultimate candidate is.