 if the court's going to take up some of the cases that were waiting for Rahimi next term. But the notion that because the Fifth Circuit went too far in this case, or in the social media jawboning case, or in the Mippa-Pristone case, or in the CFPB case, that that proves that the Supreme Court's not ideological, I think, is flawed at its inception. This is an ideologically divided court that just sometimes gets cases where even the justices can agree.