 in the short term even, government take from people. They inherently do not like it. And the reason they inherently don't like it is because they have all these illustrious programs that they want to spend money on. And most of them want to spend the money because they think they're going to help people, right? So when they see structurally a bill that would reduce their take from people, they inherently don't like it, right? Because now they have less money, at least temporarily. To give out to other people, right?