 Hey, Leland, thanks for having me on. Yeah, okay, so let's try to make this in layman's terms and tell me if I'm off. Essentially what I see in this, just boiling it down to the simplest explanation, is that when the executive branch is doing the executive branch things, it can't be prosecuted for that. It was given that job. It's within the purview of their authority. We may not like it. We may disagree with it. It may not be the right decision, but we can't prosecute them for it. When they are not doing their duty, then yeah, sure, go ahead. They're not above the law. Is that the wrong way of looking at it, or...