 And I have to give kudos to Judge Cannon. When she initially decided to hold a hearing on this issue of whether Jack Smith was constitutionally appointed, she did it before Clarence Thomas wrote his concurring opinion. She got a lot of flack from the mainstream media, and she's been portrayed, I think, really unfairly by a lot of those commentators. But her opinion today, whether it's ultimately upheld or not, and I think there are compelling reasons why it should be upheld on appeal.