 using this money in any way they want. They can donate all this money to their church if they want. They can use this money to send their kids to private school if they want. It's an indirect benefit. It's given to the citizens of Alaska and then they go and they spend it on whatever they want. They can go to Hawaii or they can donate it all to mission strips. And I thought that was a very good argument and sets up sort of a parallel example between the two kinds of