 where you don't just line the justices up along the ideological spectrum. That's not new. But the notion that because there are some issues the court is taking without an ideological valence, that means that this court is not sharply ideologically divided. That's the part that I think just has to be pushed back against. I mean, look at yesterday, you know, Trump in quarter post. You look at Loper Bright. I mean, Hugh, almost all of the big decisions we've been talking about in this half hour are decisions that sorted the justices into their ideological categories.