Mill's distinctions because a great many of you reported that you prefer the Simpsons but that you still consider Shakespeare to be the higher for the worthier pleasure that's the dilemma with which our experiment confronts Mill. what about Mill's attempt to account for especially weighty character of individual rights and justice in chapter five of utilitarianism? he wants to say that individual rights are worthy of special respect in fact he goes so far as to say that justice is the most sacred part and the most incomparably binding  part of morality but the same challenge could be put to this part of Mill's defense why is justice the chief part and the most binding part of our morality? well he says because in the long run if we do justice and if we respect rights, society as a whole will be better off in the long run. well what about that? what if we have a case where making an exception and violating individual rights actually will make people better off in the long run is it all right then? to use people? and there's a further objection that could be raised against 