In the case of Electrolux Thailand workers, when employee committees refuses to accept the company's proposal, the court makes another appointment in November, or in the next four months the problem generally facing workers who want to exercise their legal rights is the costs in terms of wating time and higher expenses employees, them, may make a slip, or may commit a crime regarding well, no, they do not commit a crime, but exercise their rights such as gathering in front of the factory, or something like that gathering in the Industrial Estate then, when there are more and more people, it is usually hard to make all the members understand the law regarding the trespassing of the owner's premise or regarding the obstruction of its entrance and exit resulting in the blocking of other employees, or they do not do that, this point will be taken by some employers or companies who do not respect the rights to assembly and rights to collective bargaining using other laws as tools against leaders of the workers or employeers as in the case of labour court's procedure at present, it is still impossible to work according to the intention of court's establishment therefore, it is not 'economical' because when the workers are in the process they need to be burdened to find a lawyer and then in the meantime, they need to come to the court, they have daily expenses for the days they attend the court is it economical or not? it may not be the case when you have a court case and then convenient, and fast at present, in the criminal court, it takes years for the court of first instance until the verdict is done, and it takes 3-4 years for the supreme court as for being fast, it is still not realized according to the will of law 