I think the term or the idea of Opencast is for everyone involved in open academic video something else because for students for example it's the perspective of consuming open video or consuming video in an open way for institutions it's something else because they are probably publishers of video and there are implications if they deal with open video or opencast instead of having it in their local repositories for faculty it is different because they are probably the rights holder in this and there's also something at stake for them so maybe everyone has a different perspective on that term but the idea was out there that the production and the dissemination of video basically should have an open character now this is not only about the content being available as in Opencast itself as a term but also is related to the technology behind it being open source for example so if for example you have a system to record lectures and if that system is a proprietary one, then really you can't hardly produce open video and I think that the Opencast Matterhorn project that I'm going to be talking about is one in the initiative that is to indicate that open source is a rather important aspect of open video 