necessarily calling for radicalization cos it was forced erm  I, I, it appeared to me that how that the Communist Party would have continued a moderate policy had the peasants not erm been demanding further radical change and in actual fact the tone of the document's quite moderate and it's protecting middle peasants, rich peasants, even some landlords who had remained loyal to the Party so it's not at all radical but erm it's just  it's radical in the sense that how that it wants to get rid of  feudalism, but it's not getting rid of landlords per se as a class.