Yes now what I meant was that, that erm in a group like this, the  the th th the leader or the leadership role may be relatively minimal and the individualism of the members may be relevant, but I hope it was cos I  I think it's a mistake for class  in groups and that so one would hope in this kind of group, the individual variation would be so important that these kind of group phenomena that Freud is talking about in this book  but clearly in other groups they're  they're more important, partly because you can never organize a group by kind of having a meeting with everybody.