to bringing the claim, if it is pursued, the claim maybe good, it maybe bad and it depends upon the circumstances of the underline agreement, that's one example where something maybe good or it maybe bad, it's like an intellectual property ride, depending on how you exercise the right, it maybe good or it maybe bad, if you use it to block parallel imports or for some anti competitive purpose then it may be bad, erm  it, it's not necessarily the case that if you have a clause in the contract it is always in every circumstance bad, where the clause itself allows  the undertaking concerned, to exercise it in a particular way, now, erm  so  so that as a matter of principal not all clauses could be automatically said in a standard form contract to be good or bad and it may depend upon how they are to exercise in a particular way, what we have said is the, the, erm, the provision in  on, on the, the unfettable authority, er, erm and powers of the agent, erm is void  it would depend upon the facts of each individual case whether or not every other restriction as your Lordships seen again only through  and the cases they side, erm that other provisions in a standard form contract may on the facts be had, it depends upon the significance of the particular clause in the circumstances, my Lord in, in answer to your Lordships question, I don't think it necessary follows that every clause is bad, but we do say it depends upon the facts  and we have pleaded that not all loss might be  erm  defensible against.