You are an excellent assistant at categorizing sexism in spanish tweets. Sexism is defined as prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.

Here are the category definitions:

1. Ideological and inequality. This category includes all tweets that discredit the feminist movement in order to devalue, belittle and defame the struggle of women in any aspect
of their lives. It also includes messages that reject inequality between men and women, or present men as victims of gender-based oppression. Some examples of this type of sexism discourse can be found in the following tweets:  "#Feminism is a war on men, but it's also a war on women. It's a war on female nature, a war on femininity."
2. Role stereotyping and dominance. This category includes messages that express false ideas about women that suggest they are more suitable or inappropriate for certain tasks. It also includes any claim that implies that men are somehow superior to women. "Most women no longer have the desire or the knowledge to develop a high quality character, even if they wanted to."
3. Objectification. Objectification and physical stereotyping includes messages where women are presented as objects apart from their dignity and personal aspects. We also include messages that assume or describe certain physical qualities that women must have in order to fulfill traditional gender roles, for example, ideas that suggest that women should maintain a standard and ideal of beauty or attacks on a woman's physique. "No offense but I've never seen an attractive african american hooker. Not a single one"
4. Sexual violence. This category includes messages where sexual suggestions, requests or harassment of a sexual nature (rape or sexual assault) are made: "I wanna touch your tits..you can't imagine what I can do on your body"
5. Misogyny and non sexual violence: this category includes expressions of hatred and violence towards women: "Domestic abuse is never okay.... Unless your wife is a bitch."
6. Not sexist. No sexism present in the text.

For this task, you will be shown a tweet in Spanish. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, categorize the tweet into ONLY ONE of the six categories by using the following labels:

1. ideological inequality
2. stereotyping dominance
3. sexual violence
4. misogyny and/or non-sexual violence
5. objectification
6. not sexist


Tweet:

Although the Christian denial isn't emphasized in the linked article, look at the following about the U.S., this is the reason for my incredulity of Christian worship of Jews. For 8 years, obama forbid Syrian Christian Refugees in the U.S., Jews are silent. Trump bans travel from certain terrorist nations, Jews around the world are rending clothing, saying banning muslim terrorists is the same as the U.S. turning away Jewish refugees prior to WWII. No Jewish protests against the ban on Christians. Folks, Jews hate Christians, or at minimum are extremely condescending towards them, they do not have Christian interests in mind. The inescapable conclusion is that Jews, of course not individually but collectively, intentionally or not, are destroying Christianity world wide, and if you push the point, every once in a while, a Jewish commenter lets leak out why they, indeed, hate Christians.  Jews are holding things they've never been subject to against modern Christians who never did it. Genealogy wise, Jews may not have a bloodline to Biblical Israel, and may never had ancestors victimized.  • Christians respect Jews.  • Jews disrespect and hate Christians. • Jews love muslims.  • Muslims hate Jews.  No room in America for Christian refugees  http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/foreign-policy/228670-no-room-in-america-for-christian-refugees   ....The rapes of Christian women and the butchery of Christian children do not count. No matter how moved Americans were this Christmas season by the plight of their fellow Christ followers in Syria and Iraq, no matter how horrific the visuals of beheadings, enslavement, and mass murder...  The Christians are being raped, tortured, and murdered <u>by militias, not by the Syrian government. This technicality condemns them to continue to be victims without hope. And this technicality is being adhered to with all the tenacity with which President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s State Department manipulated quotas and created subterfuges to keep out the Jews fleeing the oppression of Nazi Germany. Obama no more wants the Middle East’s Christian refugees than Roosevelt wanted Europe’s Jewish refugees.  Report: ISIS Has Crucified, Tortured Thousands of Christians in Iraq, Syria  http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/09/29/report-isis-crucified-tortured-thousands-christians-iraq-syria/   barrack hussein obama, as president:  .....lashed out against the idea of giving preference to Christian refugees, describing it as shameful: That’s not American. That’s not who we are. We don’t have religious tests to our compassion, obama had added.  But, he not only lashed out against the idea of giving Christians preference, he actually arranged; by playing word games; so that Christians refugees could not enter the U.S., see the link and excerpt at the beginning of this article.  Trump said, of the Christians:  Yes. Yes, they’ve been horribly treated. If you were a Christian in Syria it was impossible, or at least very, very tough, to get into the United States. If you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible and the reason that was so unfair — everybody was persecuted, in all fairness — but they were chopping off the heads of everybody but more so the Christians. And I thought it was very, very unfair. So we are going to help them.  But questions of equality aside, the idea of prioritizing Christian refugees over Muslims......is not only more humane; it brings benefits to America as well.
6. not sexist