You are an excellent assistant at categorizing sexism in spanish tweets. Sexism is defined as prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.

Here are the category definitions:

1. Ideological and inequality. This category includes all tweets that discredit the feminist movement in order to devalue, belittle and defame the struggle of women in any aspect
of their lives. It also includes messages that reject inequality between men and women, or present men as victims of gender-based oppression. Some examples of this type of sexism discourse can be found in the following tweets:  "#Feminism is a war on men, but it's also a war on women. It's a war on female nature, a war on femininity."
2. Role stereotyping and dominance. This category includes messages that express false ideas about women that suggest they are more suitable or inappropriate for certain tasks. It also includes any claim that implies that men are somehow superior to women. "Most women no longer have the desire or the knowledge to develop a high quality character, even if they wanted to."
3. Objectification. Objectification and physical stereotyping includes messages where women are presented as objects apart from their dignity and personal aspects. We also include messages that assume or describe certain physical qualities that women must have in order to fulfill traditional gender roles, for example, ideas that suggest that women should maintain a standard and ideal of beauty or attacks on a woman's physique. "No offense but I've never seen an attractive african american hooker. Not a single one"
4. Sexual violence. This category includes messages where sexual suggestions, requests or harassment of a sexual nature (rape or sexual assault) are made: "I wanna touch your tits..you can't imagine what I can do on your body"
5. Misogyny and non sexual violence: this category includes expressions of hatred and violence towards women: "Domestic abuse is never okay.... Unless your wife is a bitch."
6. Not sexist. No sexism present in the text.

For this task, you will be shown a tweet in Spanish. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, categorize the tweet into ONLY ONE of the six categories by using the following labels:

1. ideological inequality
2. stereotyping dominance
3. sexual violence
4. misogyny and/or non-sexual violence
5. objectification
6. not sexist


Tweet:

https://www.waaytv.com/content/news/Madison-Co-probate-court-recognizes-aborted-fetus-as-person-with-legal-rights-506690421.html?fbclid=IwAR2_TxrLzVJs37j9ulAwK4nmPKYMiywyfjd9cx1kOk0KlMHwkh-yR17hL-0https://www.personhoodal.com/uploads/7/7/9/1/7791541/baby_roe_complaint_-_date_stamped_for_public_release-1.pdf1) Fuck everyone involved who is still alive.2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m1EFMoRFvY3) By his own terms, and his terms are accurate, he is an accessory to murder. Bitch, you're not the victim here. You either a) put a baby in someone who you knew or should have known would kill said baby or b) you gave babies to people with reckless disregard to whether they would kill them. It is not uncommon for this demographic to kill babies so you had a duty to vet them for their murderous tendencies. This is no different than if you hire a baby sitter who either a) you know kills children or 2) was a member of a group who had a 23% (https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2017/abortion-common-experience-us-women-despite-dramatic-declines-rates) rate of killing children and you didn't bother to ask or run a background check. If you did this you would rightfully (inb4 court shouldn't exist) be charged with negligent homicide.4) Aside from the fact that this is Alabama, I don't know how you got standing. Legally, you're just some guy. Because that's what you CHOOSE to be. You can't DNA test someone at the embryonic stage so there is no way for you to establish you status as anything other than some guy. MORALLY, you're just some guy. If I was arbitrator of AnCapistan I'd tell you to go fuck yourself and get out of my office. Even if you could establish paternity that's what I would tell you (though I have a let the chips fall where they may perspective on non established parties in abortion cases so if you dealt with it yourself I'd tell their heirs to gtfo too, and I acknowledge that that's not really an option you have under statism. But I don't gaf because you had SO many other options here.)5) This fence sitting that men do is getting retarded. (Yes, women allow it; I bitch at them enough.) You either want the title or you don't. If you want the title, then get up off your ass, get a fucking job, commit, and head the family. If you don't want the title, fine, then do what you're gonna do, but when shit doesn't go your way you have no rights because you have no responsibilities. You're not head of the family on days you feel like it. You either are or you aren't. If you choose that you aren't then you're just some guy when decisions have to be made, including non-murder-y decisions of course, because women can't rely on you so they are going to rely on themselves.6) No, I do not care more about the fact that this will create disincentives for clinics to commit feticide. Feticide (as a form of birth control anyway) is a symptom of people arranging their lives in new and interestingly stupid ways, not the other way around. If he was married to her I'd have *SOME* sympathy, but still tell him that he needed to vet better.
6. not sexist