Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_battle-3373b045-5ff9-4ce0-a2b2-8ef01025c9d5.jsonl

@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 {"tstamp": 1731394456.0179, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "78944a66bd904b50b0efe75a4091c3e9", "0_model_name": "text-embedding-004", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "000be92e1ccb4e9c8f43d8269408883a", "1_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Artificial general intelligence\n\nMany interdisciplinary approaches (e.g. cognitive science, computational intelligence, and decision making) consider additional traits such as imagination (the ability to form novel mental images and concepts) and autonomy.\nComputer-based systems that exhibit many of these capabilities exist (e.g. see computational creativity, automated reasoning, decision support system, robot, evolutionary computation, intelligent agent). However, no consensus holds that modern AI systems possess them to an adequate degree.\nPhysical traits\nOther capabilities are considered desirable in intelligent systems, as they may affect intelligence or aid in its expression. These include:\nthe ability to sense (e.g. see, hear, etc.), and\nthe ability to act (e.g. move and manipulate objects, change location to explore, etc.)\nThis includes the ability to detect and respond to hazard.\nTests for human-level AGI\nSeveral tests meant to confirm human-level AGI have been considered, including:\nThe Turing Test (Turing)\nA machine and a human both converse unseen with a second human, who must evaluate which of the two is the machine, which passes the test if it can fool the evaluator a significant fraction of the time. Note: Turing does not prescribe what should qualify as intelligence, only that knowing that it is a machine should disqualify it. The AI Eugene Goostman, imitating a 13-year-old boy, achieved Turing's estimate of convincing 33% of judges that it was human in 2014.\nThe Robot College Student Test (Goertzel)"]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1731396089.6296, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "ce543cd2821b405eb447c7b228f60b7e", "0_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "0_prompt": "What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "0_output": [["What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What does `if name == \"__main__\"` mean in Python? \nPossible Duplicate:\nWhat does <if name==“main”:> do? \n\nI have wrote scripts in Python for quite a while now and I study more of Python as I need it. When reading other people's code I meet if name == \"__main__\": construct quite often. \nWhat is it good for?\n\nA: Basically, \nThere's a distinction between the \"main\" script file and external files which were imported or referenced in another way. If the script is the \"main\" script then the special variable __name__ will equal \"__main__\".\nYou can use this to protect the \"execution\" code from the classes and variables the script has. This enables you to import a script and use classes and variables without actually running that script's main code if it has any.\nSee also: What does if name == “main”: do?\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "6151e2791b6d489cb547ac78b762c99f", "1_model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "1_prompt": "What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "1_output": [["What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What does `if name == \"__main__\"` mean in Python? \nPossible Duplicate:\nWhat does <if name==“main”:> do? \n\nI have wrote scripts in Python for quite a while now and I study more of Python as I need it. When reading other people's code I meet if name == \"__main__\": construct quite often. \nWhat is it good for?\n\nA: Basically, \nThere's a distinction between the \"main\" script file and external files which were imported or referenced in another way. If the script is the \"main\" script then the special variable __name__ will equal \"__main__\".\nYou can use this to protect the \"execution\" code from the classes and variables the script has. This enables you to import a script and use classes and variables without actually running that script's main code if it has any.\nSee also: What does if name == “main”: do?\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}

data/retrieval_individual-3373b045-5ff9-4ce0-a2b2-8ef01025c9d5.jsonl

@@ -1,2 +1,7 @@
 {"tstamp": 1731394446.464, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-004", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731394445.6013, "finish": 1731394446.464, "ip": "", "conv_id": "78944a66bd904b50b0efe75a4091c3e9", "model_name": "text-embedding-004", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1731394446.464, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731394445.6013, "finish": 1731394446.464, "ip": "", "conv_id": "000be92e1ccb4e9c8f43d8269408883a", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Artificial general intelligence\n\nMany interdisciplinary approaches (e.g. cognitive science, computational intelligence, and decision making) consider additional traits such as imagination (the ability to form novel mental images and concepts) and autonomy.\nComputer-based systems that exhibit many of these capabilities exist (e.g. see computational creativity, automated reasoning, decision support system, robot, evolutionary computation, intelligent agent). However, no consensus holds that modern AI systems possess them to an adequate degree.\nPhysical traits\nOther capabilities are considered desirable in intelligent systems, as they may affect intelligence or aid in its expression. These include:\nthe ability to sense (e.g. see, hear, etc.), and\nthe ability to act (e.g. move and manipulate objects, change location to explore, etc.)\nThis includes the ability to detect and respond to hazard.\nTests for human-level AGI\nSeveral tests meant to confirm human-level AGI have been considered, including:\nThe Turing Test (Turing)\nA machine and a human both converse unseen with a second human, who must evaluate which of the two is the machine, which passes the test if it can fool the evaluator a significant fraction of the time. Note: Turing does not prescribe what should qualify as intelligence, only that knowing that it is a machine should disqualify it. The AI Eugene Goostman, imitating a 13-year-old boy, achieved Turing's estimate of convincing 33% of judges that it was human in 2014.\nThe Robot College Student Test (Goertzel)"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1731396082.101, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "voyage-multilingual-2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731396081.3659, "finish": 1731396082.101, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ce543cd2821b405eb447c7b228f60b7e", "model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "prompt": "What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "output": [["What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What does `if name == \"__main__\"` mean in Python? \nPossible Duplicate:\nWhat does <if name==“main”:> do? \n\nI have wrote scripts in Python for quite a while now and I study more of Python as I need it. When reading other people's code I meet if name == \"__main__\": construct quite often. \nWhat is it good for?\n\nA: Basically, \nThere's a distinction between the \"main\" script file and external files which were imported or referenced in another way. If the script is the \"main\" script then the special variable __name__ will equal \"__main__\".\nYou can use this to protect the \"execution\" code from the classes and variables the script has. This enables you to import a script and use classes and variables without actually running that script's main code if it has any.\nSee also: What does if name == “main”: do?\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1731396082.101, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731396081.3659, "finish": 1731396082.101, "ip": "", "conv_id": "6151e2791b6d489cb547ac78b762c99f", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "output": [["What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What does `if name == \"__main__\"` mean in Python? \nPossible Duplicate:\nWhat does <if name==“main”:> do? \n\nI have wrote scripts in Python for quite a while now and I study more of Python as I need it. When reading other people's code I meet if name == \"__main__\": construct quite often. \nWhat is it good for?\n\nA: Basically, \nThere's a distinction between the \"main\" script file and external files which were imported or referenced in another way. If the script is the \"main\" script then the special variable __name__ will equal \"__main__\".\nYou can use this to protect the \"execution\" code from the classes and variables the script has. This enables you to import a script and use classes and variables without actually running that script's main code if it has any.\nSee also: What does if name == “main”: do?\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1731396105.8284, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731396105.5591, "finish": 1731396105.8284, "ip": "", "conv_id": "d7e540998eb04b5c8376c3221e522621", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "output": [["Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "Kepler-62f\n\nKepler-62f (also known by its Kepler Object of Interest designation KOI-701.04) is a super-Earth exoplanet orbiting within the habitable zone of the star Kepler-62, the outermost of five such planets discovered around the star by NASA's Kepler spacecraft.  It is located about  from Earth in the constellation of Lyra."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1731396105.8284, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731396105.5591, "finish": 1731396105.8284, "ip": "", "conv_id": "3a4910cf7c00405c9ebe34300a96deff", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "output": [["Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "Habitable zone\n\nK2-18b is an exoplanet 124 light-years away, orbiting in the habitable zone of the K2-18, a red dwarf. This planet is significant for water vapor found in its atmosphere; this was announced on September 17, 2019.\nIn September 2020, astronomers identified 24 superhabitable planet (planets better than Earth) contenders, from among more than 4000 confirmed exoplanets at present, based on astrophysical parameters, as well as the natural history of known life forms on the Earth.\nHabitability outside the HZ\nLiquid-water environments have been found to exist in the absence of atmospheric pressure and at temperatures outside the HZ temperature range. For example, Saturn's moons Titan and Enceladus and Jupiter's moons Europa and Ganymede, all of which are outside the habitable zone, may hold large volumes of liquid water in subsurface oceans.\nOutside the HZ, tidal heating and radioactive decay are two possible heat sources that could contribute to the existence of liquid water. Abbot and Switzer (2011) put forward the possibility that subsurface water could exist on rogue planets as a result of radioactive decay-based heating and insulation by a thick surface layer of ice.\nWith some theorising that life on Earth may have actually originated in stable, subsurface habitats, it has been suggested that it may be common for wet subsurface extraterrestrial habitats such as these to 'teem with life'. On Earth itself, living organisms may be found more than  below the surface."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1731396204.4094, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731396204.2165, "finish": 1731396204.4094, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ab31ddd3a7aa4012a999bea9126163cb", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}