<P> In this stage `` ... participants form opinions about the character and integrity of the other participants and feel compelled to voice these opinions if they find someone shirking responsibility or attempting to dominate . Sometimes participants question the actions or decision of the leader as the expedition grows harder ... '' . Disagreements and personality clashes must be resolved before the team can progress out of this stage , and so some teams may never emerge from `` storming '' or re-enter that phase if new challenges or disputes arise . In Tuckman 's 1965 paper , only 50 % of the studies identified a stage of intragroup conflict , and some of the remaining studies jumped directly from stage 1 to stage 3 . Some groups may avoid the phase altogether , but for those who do n't , the duration , intensity and destructiveness of the `` storms '' can be varied . Tolerance of each team member and their differences should be emphasized ; without tolerance and patience the team will fail . This phase can become destructive to the team and will lower motivation if allowed to get out of control . Some teams will never develop past this stage ; however , disagreements within the team can make members stronger , more versatile , and able to work more effectively as a team . Supervisors of the team during this phase may be more accessible , but tend to remain directive in their guidance of decision - making and professional behaviour . The team members will therefore resolve their differences and members will be able to participate with one another more comfortably . The ideal is that they will not feel that they are being judged , and will therefore share their opinions and views . Normally tension , struggle and sometimes arguments occur . This stage can also be upsetting . </P>
<P> In this stage `` ... participants form opinions about the character and integrity of the other participants and feel compelled to voice these opinions if they find someone shirking responsibility or attempting to dominate . Sometimes participants question the actions or decision of the leader as the expedition grows harder ... '' . Disagreements and personality clashes must be resolved before the team can progress out of this stage , and so some teams may never emerge from `` storming '' or re-enter that phase if new challenges or disputes arise . In Tuckman 's 1965 paper , only 50 % of the studies identified a stage of intragroup conflict , and some of the remaining studies jumped directly from stage 1 to stage 3 . Some groups may avoid the phase altogether , but for those who do n't , the duration , intensity and destructiveness of the `` storms '' can be varied . Tolerance of each team member and their differences should be emphasized ; without tolerance and patience the team will fail . This phase can become destructive to the team and will lower motivation if allowed to get out of control . Some teams will never develop past this stage ; however , disagreements within the team can make members stronger , more versatile , and able to work more effectively as a team . Supervisors of the team during this phase may be more accessible , but tend to remain directive in their guidance of decision - making and professional behaviour . The team members will therefore resolve their differences and members will be able to participate with one another more comfortably . The ideal is that they will not feel that they are being judged , and will therefore share their opinions and views . Normally tension , struggle and sometimes arguments occur . This stage can also be upsetting . </P>
group conflicts are resolved during which stage of linear group development
group conflicts are resolved during which stage of linear group development
storming
storming