<P> The Supreme Court has resisted efforts to require officers to more fully advise suspects of their rights . For example , the police are not required to advise the suspect that they can stop the interrogation at any time , that the decision to exercise the right can not be used against the suspect , or that they have a right to talk to a lawyer before being asked any questions . Nor have the courts required to explain the rights . For example , the standard Miranda right to counsel states You have a right to have an attorney present during the questioning . Police are not required to explain that this right is not merely a right to have a lawyer present while the suspect is being questioned . The right to counsel includes : </P>
<P> The Supreme Court has resisted efforts to require officers to more fully advise suspects of their rights . For example , the police are not required to advise the suspect that they can stop the interrogation at any time , that the decision to exercise the right can not be used against the suspect , or that they have a right to talk to a lawyer before being asked any questions . Nor have the courts required to explain the rights . For example , the standard Miranda right to counsel states You have a right to have an attorney present during the questioning . Police are not required to explain that this right is not merely a right to have a lawyer present while the suspect is being questioned . The right to counsel includes : </P>
when must a suspect be read their miranda rights
when must a suspect be read their miranda rights
before being asked any questions
before being asked any questions