[PAR] [TLE] United States v. Windsor [SEP] United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. ___ (2013) (Docket No.  12-307 ), is a landmark civil rights case in which the United States Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of "marriage" and "spouse" to apply only to opposite-sex unions, by Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.  In the majority opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote: "The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity." [PAR] [TLE] Same-sex immigration policy in the United States [SEP] Same-sex immigration policy in the United States denied couples in same-sex relationships the same rights and privileges afforded different-sex couples based on several court decisions and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional in "United States v. Windsor" on June 26, 2013.
[PAR] [TLE] United States v. Windsor [ SEP ] United States v. Windsor , 570 U.S. _ _ _ ( 2013 ) ( Docket No . 12 - 307 ) , is a landmark civil rights case in which the United States Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of " marriage " and " spouse " to apply only to opposite - sex unions , by Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ( DOMA ) , is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment . In the majority opinion , Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote : " The federal statute is invalid , for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State , by its marriage laws , sought to protect in personhood and dignity . " [PAR] [TLE] Same - sex immigration policy in the United States [ SEP ] Same - sex immigration policy in the United States denied couples in same - sex relationships the same rights and privileges afforded different - sex couples based on several court decisions and the Defense of Marriage Act ( DOMA ) until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional in " United States v. Windsor " on June 26 , 2013 .
A policy in the United States denied couples in same-sex relationships the same rights and privileges afforded different-sex couples was deemed unconstitutional in a landmark civil rights case in which the majority opinion wrote: "The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity.", Who was it that wrote this?
A policy in the United States denied couples in same - sex relationships the same rights and privileges afforded different - sex couples was deemed unconstitutional in a landmark civil rights case in which the majority opinion wrote : " The federal statute is invalid , for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State , by its marriage laws , sought to protect in personhood and dignity . " , Who was it that wrote this ?
Justice Anthony Kennedy
Justice Anthony Kennedy