<P> Melinda Cupps Dickler , in her article `` The Morse Quartet : Student Speech And The First Amendment '' in the Loyola Law Review , provided a survey of commentary that followed in the immediate aftermath of the case : Some commentators have suggested that Morse both demonstrated a division among the Justices on student speech rights and continued Fraser 's and Kuhlmeier 's erosion of students ' First Amendment rights . She regards this suggestion as `` not surprising '' given the outcome of the decision , the plain language of the holding , and the dissenting Justices ' charge that the opinion did `` serious violence to the First Amendment '' . She adds that other commentators have asserted that while Morse did not dramatically change the law regarding student speech , it failed to answer any of the questions left by the Tinker trilogy . She notes that these questions -- what First Amendment protection is owed to student speech , and how courts should analyze its censorship -- are currently significant as schools struggle with the issues of discriminatory student speech or hate speech , and student speech threatening violence . Further , `` such questions are always paramount because schools are the training grounds for our nation 's citizens and future leaders . '' </P>
<P> Melinda Cupps Dickler , in her article `` The Morse Quartet : Student Speech And The First Amendment '' in the Loyola Law Review , provided a survey of commentary that followed in the immediate aftermath of the case : Some commentators have suggested that Morse both demonstrated a division among the Justices on student speech rights and continued Fraser 's and Kuhlmeier 's erosion of students ' First Amendment rights . She regards this suggestion as `` not surprising '' given the outcome of the decision , the plain language of the holding , and the dissenting Justices ' charge that the opinion did `` serious violence to the First Amendment '' . She adds that other commentators have asserted that while Morse did not dramatically change the law regarding student speech , it failed to answer any of the questions left by the Tinker trilogy . She notes that these questions -- what First Amendment protection is owed to student speech , and how courts should analyze its censorship -- are currently significant as schools struggle with the issues of discriminatory student speech or hate speech , and student speech threatening violence . Further , `` such questions are always paramount because schools are the training grounds for our nation 's citizens and future leaders . '' </P>
in morse v. frederick what was the question at stake
in morse v. frederick what was the question at stake
what First Amendment protection is owed to student speech , and how courts should analyze its censorship
what First Amendment protection is owed to student speech , and how courts should analyze its censorship