<P> The courts exercise judicial review of executive actions and legislation for compliance with the Constitution , empowering statutes and administrative law principles . Though it has been noted that there is a low incidence of judicial disagreement with the executive , this may not be evidence of undue deference to the executive but may merely be that the executive has attained a high degree of fairness in its decision - making . The fact that a large number of defamation cases involving opponents of the Government have been decided in favour of the Government and members of the ruling People 's Action Party has led to criticism that the judiciary is not impartial . On the other hand , it has been pointed out that the defendants in such cases have not been successful in proving the truth of the allegedly defamatory facts . </P>
<P> The courts exercise judicial review of executive actions and legislation for compliance with the Constitution , empowering statutes and administrative law principles . Though it has been noted that there is a low incidence of judicial disagreement with the executive , this may not be evidence of undue deference to the executive but may merely be that the executive has attained a high degree of fairness in its decision - making . The fact that a large number of defamation cases involving opponents of the Government have been decided in favour of the Government and members of the ruling People 's Action Party has led to criticism that the judiciary is not impartial . On the other hand , it has been pointed out that the defendants in such cases have not been successful in proving the truth of the allegedly defamatory facts . </P>
independence of judiciary is pertinent because it accords the judiciary the power to
independence of judiciary is pertinent because it accords the judiciary the power to
exercise judicial review of executive actions and legislation
exercise judicial review of executive actions and legislation