[PAR] [TLE] Batson v. Kentucky [SEP] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) , was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that a prosecutor's use of peremptory challenge in a criminal case—the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so—may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on their race.  The Court ruled that this practice violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  The case gave rise to the term "Batson challenge", an objection to a peremptory challenge based on the standard established by the Supreme Court's decision in this case.  Subsequent jurisprudence has resulted in the extension of "Batson" to civil cases ("Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company") and cases where jurors are excluded on the basis of sex ("J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel.  T.B."). [PAR] [TLE] J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. [SEP] J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel.  T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that making peremptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror's sex is unconstitutional.  "J.E.B." extended the court's existing precedent in "Batson v. Kentucky" (1986), which found race-based peremptory challenges in criminal trials unconstitutional, and "Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company" (1991), which extended that principle to civil trials.  As in "Batson", the court found that sex-based challenges violate the Equal Protection Clause.
[PAR] [TLE] Batson v. Kentucky [ SEP ] Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 ( 1986 ) , was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that a prosecutor 's use of peremptory challenge in a criminal case — the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so — may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on their race . The Court ruled that this practice violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . The case gave rise to the term " Batson challenge " , an objection to a peremptory challenge based on the standard established by the Supreme Court 's decision in this case . Subsequent jurisprudence has resulted in the extension of " Batson " to civil cases ( " Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company " ) and cases where jurors are excluded on the basis of sex ( " J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel . T.B. " ) . [PAR] [TLE] J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel . T.B. [ SEP ] J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel . T. B. , 511 U.S. 127 ( 1994 ) , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that making peremptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror 's sex is unconstitutional . " J.E.B. " extended the court 's existing precedent in " Batson v. Kentucky " ( 1986 ) , which found race - based peremptory challenges in criminal trials unconstitutional , and " Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company " ( 1991 ) , which extended that principle to civil trials . As in " Batson " , the court found that sex - based challenges violate the Equal Protection Clause .
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. extended precedent in which 1986 case regarding race-based peremptory challenges in criminal trials?
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel . T.B. extended precedent in which 1986 case regarding race - based peremptory challenges in criminal trials ?
Batson v. Kentucky
Batson v. Kentucky