On the other hand, the opinion of Jagić from 1864 is argued not to have firm grounds. When Jagić says "Croatian", he refers to a few cases referring to the Dubrovnik vernacular as ilirski (Illyrian). This was a common name for all Slavic vernaculars in Dalmatian cities among the Roman inhabitants. In the meantime, other written monuments are found that mention srpski, lingua serviana (= Serbian), and some that mention Croatian. By far the most competent Serbian scientist on the Dubrovnik language issue, Milan Rešetar, who was born in Dubrovnik himself, wrote behalf of language characteristics: "The one who thinks that Croatian and Serbian are two separate languages must confess that Dubrovnik always (linguistically) used to be Serbian."
On the other hand , the opinion of Jagić from 1864 is argued not to have firm grounds . When Jagić says " Croatian " , he refers to a few cases referring to the Dubrovnik vernacular as ilirski ( Illyrian ) . This was a common name for all Slavic vernaculars in Dalmatian cities among the Roman inhabitants . In the meantime , other written monuments are found that mention srpski , lingua serviana (= Serbian ) , and some that mention Croatian . By far the most competent Serbian scientist on the Dubrovnik language issue , Milan Rešetar , who was born in Dubrovnik himself , wrote behalf of language characteristics : " The one who thinks that Croatian and Serbian are two separate languages must confess that Dubrovnik always ( linguistically ) used to be Serbian . "
Where was Milan Resetar born?
Where was Milan Resetar born ?
Dubrovnik
Dubrovnik