<P> Fee - for - service ( FFS ) is a payment model where services are unbundled and paid for separately . In health care , it gives an incentive for physicians to provide more treatments because payment is dependent on the quantity of care , rather than quality of care . However evidence of the effectiveness of pay - for - performance in improving health care quality is mixed , without conclusive proof that these programs either succeed or fail . https://hbr.org/2013/10/doubts-about-pay-for-performance-in-health-care Similarly , when patients are shielded from paying ( cost - sharing ) by health insurance coverage , they are incentivized to welcome any medical service that might do some good . FFS is the dominant physician payment method in the United States , and it raises costs , discourages the efficiencies of integrated care , and a variety of reform efforts have been attempted , recommended , or initiated to reduce its influence ( such as moving towards bundled payments and capitation ) . In capitation , physicians are discouraged from performing procedures , including necessary ones , because they are not paid anything extra for performing them . In the Japanese health care system , FFS is mixed with a nationwide price setting mechanism ( all - payer rate setting ) to control costs . </P>
<P> Fee - for - service ( FFS ) is a payment model where services are unbundled and paid for separately . In health care , it gives an incentive for physicians to provide more treatments because payment is dependent on the quantity of care , rather than quality of care . However evidence of the effectiveness of pay - for - performance in improving health care quality is mixed , without conclusive proof that these programs either succeed or fail . https://hbr.org/2013/10/doubts-about-pay-for-performance-in-health-care Similarly , when patients are shielded from paying ( cost - sharing ) by health insurance coverage , they are incentivized to welcome any medical service that might do some good . FFS is the dominant physician payment method in the United States , and it raises costs , discourages the efficiencies of integrated care , and a variety of reform efforts have been attempted , recommended , or initiated to reduce its influence ( such as moving towards bundled payments and capitation ) . In capitation , physicians are discouraged from performing procedures , including necessary ones , because they are not paid anything extra for performing them . In the Japanese health care system , FFS is mixed with a nationwide price setting mechanism ( all - payer rate setting ) to control costs . </P>
fee-for-service is an accident and health insurance benefit payment model in which
fee-for-service is an accident and health insurance benefit payment model in which
services are unbundled and paid for separately
services are unbundled and paid for separately