<P> Despite the procedural differences , the substantive laws regarding the grounds of judicial review in Scotland are similar to those in other western legal systems , with decisions in one jurisdiction regarded as highly persuasive in the others . There is , however , one substantial difference in Scotland since there is no distinction between review of a public body and a private body , which is different from , for example , judicial review in England and Wales , where review is only possible in the case of a public body or a quasi-public body ( West v. Secretary of State for Scotland ) . </P>
<P> Despite the procedural differences , the substantive laws regarding the grounds of judicial review in Scotland are similar to those in other western legal systems , with decisions in one jurisdiction regarded as highly persuasive in the others . There is , however , one substantial difference in Scotland since there is no distinction between review of a public body and a private body , which is different from , for example , judicial review in England and Wales , where review is only possible in the case of a public body or a quasi-public body ( West v. Secretary of State for Scotland ) . </P>
difference between judicial review in scotland and england
difference between judicial review in scotland and england
no distinction between review of a public body and a private body
no distinction between review of a public body and a private body