In short @attorneyjeremy1 critiques the "Better Markets" legal brief for misunderstanding a court ruling on Ripple's XRP sales. The judge ruled that #XRP buyers couldn’t rely on @Ripple to increase prices because they didn’t know if they were buying directly from #Ripple or others. 

"Better Markets" fails to address this reasoning and instead just argues the decision is wrong. 

Conclusion:
The ruling in Ripple's favor was based on specific facts about how #XRP was sold. The "Better Markets" brief fails to effectively challenge those facts or the legal reasoning, which makes it a weak argument. Poor @attorneyjeremy1 is exasperated by this approach!
#XRP #Ripple