how equitable relief works
equitable relief is distinct from a legal claim such as monetary compensation and is employed to prompt or prevent action in cases when a legal remedy would not constitute adequate restitution for the breach of contract or other offense this prompting often takes the form of a court injunction which enforces the remedy by punishing non compliance with civil or criminal penalties jurisdictional clauses that provide for equitable relief often require such cases to include an acknowledgment between both parties that legal relief wouldn t compensate for a breach of contract or that a breach would result in irreparable damages or injury and acknowledgment between parties that a breach of contract could result in the offended party seeking an injunction or another form of equitable relief the offended party must also be found to be entirely free from blame in the dispute often called the clean hands principle it can be applied to deny equitable relief if the offended party has not acted entirely in good faith or has delayed unnecessarily in seeking a remedy equitable relief is not the same as monetary compensation equitable relief in practiceequitable relief is almost always incurred when there has been a breach of contract a common form of equitable relief will order the rescission of a contract which cancels all terms and obligations and restores both parties to their pre contract position these often occur during contracts involving property because the personal value of property to a party can often extend beyond monetary compensation a court could order the property to be sold pursuant to the terms of the original contract or cancel the contract courts could order rectification a revision to a contract so that it more accurately reflects the intentions of both parties in essence stating what had been initially understood they could also order that the obligations of a contract be fulfilled as initially drafted if they are found to have breached its terms equitable relief is often provided in cases where intellectual property or other sensitive information has been stolen or otherwise ill gotten for example gag orders which prevent a party from publishing sensitive information are often issued in cases of intellectual property theft in these cases the potential business or reputation challenges of the offending party releasing the ill gotten information could not be adequately rectified with monetary compensation 