how austerity works
governments experience financial instability when their debt outweighs the amount of revenue they receive resulting in large budget deficits debt levels generally increase when government spending increases as mentioned above this means that there is a greater chance that federal governments can default on their debts creditors in turn demand higher interest to avoid the risk of default on these debts in order to satisfy their creditors and control their debt levels they may have to take certain measures austerity only takes place when this gap between government receipts and government expenditures shrinks this situation occurs when governments spend too much or when they take on too much debt as such a government may need to consider austerity measures when it owes more money to its creditors than it receives in revenues implementing these measures helps put confidence back into the economy while helping restore some semblance of balance to government budgets austerity measures indicate that governments are willing to take steps to bring some degree of financial health back to their budgets as a result creditors may be willing to lower interest rates on debt when austerity measures are in place but there may be certain conditions on these moves for instance interest rates on greek debt fell following its first bailout 1 however the gains were limited to the government having decreased interest rate expenses although the private sector was unable to benefit the major beneficiaries of lower rates are large corporations consumers benefited only marginally from lower rates but the lack of sustainable economic growth kept borrowing at depressed levels despite the lower rates special considerationsa reduction in government spending doesn t simply equate to austerity in fact governments may need to implement these measures during certain cycles of the economy for example the global economic downturn that began in 2008 left many governments with reduced tax revenues and exposed what some believed were unsustainable spending levels several european countries including the united kingdom greece and spain turned to austerity as a way to alleviate budget concerns austerity became almost imperative during the global recession in europe where eurozone members didn t have the ability to address mounting debts by printing their own currency thus as their default risk increased creditors put pressure on certain european countries to aggressively tackle spending types of austeritybroadly speaking there are three primary types of austerity measures there is some disagreement among economists about the effect of tax policy on the government budget former ronald reagan adviser arthur laffer famously argued that strategically cutting taxes would spur economic activity paradoxically leading to more revenue 2still most economists and policy analysts agree that raising taxes will raise revenues this was the tactic that many european countries took for example greece increased value added tax vat rates to 23 in 2010 3 the government raised income tax rates on upper income scales along with adding new property taxes 4the opposite austerity measure is reducing government spending most consider this to be a more efficient means of reducing the deficit new taxes mean new revenue for politicians who are inclined to spend it on constituents spending takes many forms including grants subsidies wealth redistribution entitlement programs paying for government services providing for the national defense benefits to government employees and foreign aid any reduction in spending is a de facto austerity measure at its simplest an austerity program that is usually enacted by legislation may include one or more of the following measures criticism of austeritythe effectiveness of austerity remains a matter of sharp debate while supporters argue that massive deficits can suffocate the broader economy thereby limiting tax revenue opponents believe that government programs are the only way to make up for reduced personal consumption during a recession cutting government spending many believe leads to large scale unemployment robust public sector spending they suggest reduces unemployment and therefore increases the number of income tax payers although austerity measures may help restore financial health to a nation s economy reduced government spending may lead to higher unemployment economists such as john maynard keynes a british thinker who fathered the school of keynesian economics believe that it is the role of governments to increase spending during a recession to replace falling private demand the logic is that if demand is not propped up and stabilized by the government unemployment will continue to rise and the economic recession will be prolonged but austerity runs contradictory to certain schools of economic thought that have been prominent since the great depression in an economic downturn falling private income reduces the amount of tax revenue that a government generates likewise government coffers fill up with tax revenue during an economic boom the irony is that public expenditures such as unemployment benefits are needed more during a recession than a boom examples of austeritya model of austerity in response to a recession occurred in the united states between 1920 and 1921 the unemployment rate in the u s economy jumped from 4 to almost 12 5 real gross national product gnp declined almost 20 over that time greater than any single year during the great depression or great recession except for 1931 1932 when it declined just over 25 67in a speech in 1920 presidential candidate warren harding declared that his administration will attempt intelligent and courageous deflation and strike at government borrowing and will attack high cost of government with every energy and facility 8 after he became president harding implemented federal spending decreases and tax cuts to fight the recession following austerity measures already implemented under president woodrow wilson however economists and historians argue over whether the austerity measures were necessary as the economy had already begun to improve by the time harding took office some economists also question whether harding s measures can be considered austerity measures as they actually ended up increasing federal tax revenues 9in exchange for bailouts after the great recession the eu and european central bank ecb embarked on an austerity program that sought to bring greece s finances under control the program cut public spending and increased taxes often at the expense of greece s public workers and was very unpopular since then greece s deficit has dramatically decreased 10 the austerity program that the country enacted in 2010 however provided only mixed benefits to its economy 11mainly austerity measures failed to improve the financial situation in greece because the country struggled in the past with a lack of aggregate demand aggregate demand declines with austerity structurally greece is a country of small businesses rather than large corporations so it benefits less from the principles of austerity such as lower interest rates these small companies do not benefit from a weakened currency as they are unable to become exporters while most of the world followed the financial crisis in 2008 with years of lackluster growth and rising asset prices greece remained mired in its own depression greece s gross domestic product gdp in 2010 was 299 36 billion in 2014 its gdp was 235 57 billion according to the united nations 12 this is staggering destruction in the country s economic fortunes akin to the great depression in the united states in the 1930s greece s problems began following the great recession as the country was spending too much money relative to tax collection as the country s finances spiraled out of control and interest rates on sovereign debt exploded higher the country was forced to seek bailouts or default on its debt 