when either an individual or a company functions with limited liability this means that assets attributed to the associated individuals cannot be seized in an effort to repay debt obligations attributed to the company funds that were directly invested with the company such as with the purchase of company stock are considered assets of the company in question and can be seized in the event of insolvency 
any other assets deemed to be in the company s possession such as real estate equipment and machinery investments made in the name of the institution and any goods that have been produced but have not been sold are also subject to seizure and liquidation without limited liability as a legal precedent many investors would be reluctant to acquire equity ownership in firms and entrepreneurs would be wary of undertaking a new venture this is because creditors and other stakeholders could claim the investors and owners assets if the company loses more money than it has limited liability prevents that from occurring so the most that can be lost is the amount invested with any personal assets held as off limits limited liability partnershipsthe actual details of a limited liability partnership depend on where it is created in general however your personal assets as a partner will be protected from legal action basically the liability is limited in the sense that you will lose assets in the partnership but not those assets outside of it i e your personal assets the partnership is the first target for any lawsuit although a specific partner could be liable if they personally did something wrong another advantage of an llp is the ability to bring partners in and let partners out because a partnership agreement exists for an llp partners can be added or retired as outlined by the agreement this comes in handy as the llp can always add partners who bring existing business with them usually the decision to add new partners requires approval from all the existing partners overall it is the flexibility of an llp for a certain type of professional that makes it a superior option to many other corporate entities the llp itself is a flow through entity for tax purposes which is also an option for llcs with flow through entities the partners receive untaxed profits and must pay the taxes themselves both llcs and llps are usually preferable to corporations which are impacted by double taxation issues double taxation occurs when the corporation must pay corporate income taxes and then individuals must pay taxes again on their personal income from the company investopedia jake shilimited liability in incorporated businessesin the context of a private company becoming incorporated can provide its owners with limited liability since an incorporated company is treated as a separate and independent legal entity limited liability is especially desirable when dealing in industries that can be subject to massive losses such as insurance an llc is a corporate structure in the united states whereby the owners are not personally liable for the company s debts or liabilities limited liability companies are hybrid entities that combine the characteristics of a corporation with those of a partnership or sole proprietorship while the limited liability feature is similar to that of a corporation the availability of flow through taxation to the members of an llc is a feature of partnerships the primary difference between a partnership and an llc is that an llc separates the business assets of the company from the personal assets of the owners insulating the owners from the llc s debts and liabilities as an example consider the misfortune that befell numerous lloyd s of london names who are private individuals that agree to take on unlimited liabilities related to insurance risk in return for pocketing profits from insurance premiums in the late 1990s hundreds of these investors had to declare bankruptcy in the face of catastrophic losses incurred on claims related to asbestosis contrast this with the losses incurred by shareholders in some of the biggest public companies that went bankrupt such as enron and lehman brothers although shareholders in these companies lost all of their investments in them they were not held liable for the hundreds of billions of dollars owed by these companies to their creditors subsequent to their bankruptcies 