We are currently writing a piece of software. In it, we want to use the Disconnect.me tracking services list. The list is licensed under the GPLv3. Our code will generally only run on servers, but we plan on releasing it under the MIT license. The tracker file will not be distributed with the software, but the setup script will automatically download it from the official source. It is then read and parsed in our software, and used to match URLs against it.Leaving aside the issue that licensing datasets under the GPL is discouraged (since it was not our decision), what are the consequences for our final code? Since the file in question is a JSON data file, I am not sure how the different forms of linking vs. fork-and-exec apply to it. Is this modularized enough that this use would be acceptable, or does this use already make the whole system a combined work and thereby require licensing the whole thing under the GPLv3?
Using GPL-covered dataset in non-GPL code
gpl;mit;open data;combined work
There's a difference between mere aggregation - distributing multiple pieces of software together on the same media - and a single program that depends on multiple parts. The GNU FAQ admits that this difference is fuzzy and may depend on the interpretation of a court.Nevertheless, you can stay relatively clear from this by separating the dataset from the non-GPL code as far as possible. Some possibilities include:Making your code function without the datasetDistributing separately, e.g. separate download links on your website for your software and the datasetThe only hard requirement is that you do not further restrict user rights on the GPL part, that is, make sure the GPL part is always available under that license.Fortunately, since your code is under a GPL-compatible license (MIT), you can:Release the whole thing as GPL, and simultaneously,Release your code, sans the GPL data, as MIT