I wonder to know if there is any bad smell on my practice for i18n on Angular.I put the I18n translating function on Angular controller (because I don't know how to put it on HTML template file)And about the i18n scope, I use this way I18n.t(city. + city_name) to indicate that the city_name is under city scope. Could I write it in this way I18n.t(city_name, scope: city) to make it more understandable.I appreciate every comment and suggestion to enhance my current solution.Data structuredepartures_lst is a list of countries' English name e.g.,: [US, China, Japan]Each country has many cities name. e.g. [New York, LA, Boston]Angular controllerApp.controller(departures_ctrl, function($scope, $location, $http) {    $http.get(/departures.json)    .success(function (response) {      $scope.departures_lst = response;    });    $scope.get_destinations = function(city_name) {          return $location.url(/depart_from/ + city_name);    };    $scope.i18nCountryName = function(country_name) {          return I18n.t(country. + country_name) + country_name    };    $scope.i18nCityName = function(city_name) {          return I18n.t(city. + city_name) + city_name    };});HTML teamplate?<div class=panel panel-transparent ng-repeat=departure in departures_lst>    <h5>{{i18nCountryName(departure.country)}}</h5>    <li class=col-sm-3 col-lg-3 col-xs-3 ng-repeat=city in departure.cities>      <a ng-click=get_destinations(city)>        <i class=fa fa-plane></i>        {{i18nCityName(city)}}      </a>    </li></div>
Displaying available destinations using Angular.JS
javascript;html;angular.js;ajax;i18n