Playing with ACL's:[root@rex web]# pwd/media/web[root@rex web]# ll -ddrwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Jan  1 14:31 .[root@rex web]# setfacl -m d:g::rwx .[root@rex web]# setfacl -m g::rwx .[root@rex web]# touch newTest[root@rex web]# getfacl newTest# file: newTest# owner: root# group: rootuser::rw-group::rw-other::r--[root@rex web]# getfacl .# file: .# owner: root# group: rootuser::rwxgroup::rwxother::r-xdefault:user::rwxdefault:group::rwxdefault:other::r-xSimple question I'm just not able to answer it. If the executable bit is in the group's default ACL why isn't it showing up in the resulting file. I thought my umask setting was at fault but got the same result there:[root@rex web]# umask0022[root@rex web]# umask 0000[root@rex web]# touch anotherTest[root@rex web]# getfacl anotherTest# file: anotherTest# owner: root# group: rootuser::rw-group::rw-other::r--I'm sure it's intentional, I just don't understand it.Tried to see if it was just something specific to the primary group but then a mask started showing up in my ACL's for some reason:[root@rex web]# setfacl -m g:web:rwx .[root@rex web]# setfacl -m d:g:web:rwx .[root@rex web]# touch newer[root@rex web]# getfacl newer# file: newer# owner: root# group: rootuser::rw-group::rwx                      #effective:rw-group:web:rwx                   #effective:rw-mask::rw-other::r--I'd imagine this is why it isn't showing up above, but my questions are:1) Why doesn't mask show up before I specify a group other than the primary group?2) Where is this mask coming from? I'm not seeing it on any parent directory.
Why doesn't the owning group get the executable bit?
linux;ext4;acl