Is this an antipattern? It is an acceptable practice?    try {        //do something    } catch (Exception e) {         try {            //do something in the same line, but being less ambitious        } catch (Exception ex) {            try {                //Do the minimum acceptable            } catch (Exception e1) {                //More try catches?            }        }    }
Is using nested try-catch blocks an anti-pattern?
anti patterns;exception handling