Just ran across this user story form:As a <user role>, I can <activity> so that <business value>(source-1 and source-2)which to me seems different than what I believe to be the standard one:As a <role>, I want <goal/desire>, so that <benefit>(source-1 and source-2)(Meaning that I'd believe I can would be in the benefit/value statement, not the goal statement. For example, So that I can [...].)Are both right, or is one flawed, and why?
Two different user story forms, are both correct?
user story
Logically a user story is describing something that the user currently can't do, otherwise there would be no need to implement anything. So wording I can ... does not make sense in the goal/action part. Most logical wording is I want .... I can imagine wording I (will) do ... (more like use case wording).For action vs. goal/desire, a goal can easily be do action. So the goal template is more generic, though I can imagine it often will end up describing an action anyway.