The case for post-scholasticism as an internal period indicator in Medieval philosophy
Johann Beükes
This article responds to a critical research challenge in Medieval philosophy scholarship regarding the internal periodisation of register. By arguing case for ‘post-scholasticism’ as an period indicator (1349–1464, era between deaths William Ockham and Nicholas Cusa), defined ‘the transformation high scholasticism on basis selective departure thereof’, specifies predisposition majority introductions commentaries proceed straight from 1349 1464, understating 115 years pertinent philosophical discourse. It is argued that modern account philosophy, this understatement manifested either predating Renaissance close gap 1464 far possible or proceeding philosophy. The presents five unique themes delicate period, indicating was indeed productive late which should not be bypassed inconsequential entrance 1349–1464 accordingly appreciated its idiosyncratic contributions history ideas late-14th early-15th centuries, with reference political intensification via moderna , pivotal separation theology resulting independence natural sciences, res critique institutions, transforming pragmatics rise materialism. Contribution: contributes methodological development by responding later Middle Ages. Arguing (1349 it stage
Theological Studies/Teologiese Studies|DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)