SAGA AND SOCIETY
Hans Jacob Orning
Click to increase image sizeClick decrease size Notes 1. D⊘rum in Scandinavian Journal of History 33, No. 2 (2008), 191–94. Unfortunately, his review is not based on my recently published book Unpredictability and Presence. Norwegian Kingship the High Middle Ages (Brill, 2008), but unpublished dissertation from 2004. 2. Cf. debate Historisk tidsskrift (Norsk) 3 2005, 1 2006, 4 2006. 3. The division between using sources as records relics sharp a principal level has often been claimed, cf. Carr Carr, E.H. 1990. What History?, London: Macmillan. First 1961 [Google Scholar], 7–30; Fulsås Fulsås, Narve. 2001. ‘Kva er gale med det historiske sanningsomgrepet? Ein kritikk av kjeldekritikken’.. Tidsskrift, 80(2): 231–46. kjeldekritikken’, 4. Miller Miller, William Ian. Blood‐Taking Peace‐Making, Chicago: University Chicago Press. 46; Bagge Bagge, Sverre. 1991. Society Politics Snorri Sturluson’s Heimskringla, Berkeley: California Sturluson's 239. 5. D⊘rum's critique also sometimes hard understand. I allegedly want underline friendship Håkon Skule, why have then put too little importance their equal power (p. 192)? And what does he mean by stating that ‘The agreements them may therefore be considered strategic choices, although choices were influenced culture negotiations period’ 6. My results are most valid for period 1177–1263, which state (Orning Orning, Hans Jacob. Uforutsigbarhet og nærvær. En analyse norske kongers maktut⊘velse i h⊘ymiddelalderen, Oslo: Dr.art.‐avhandling historie. 2004, 3). However, with hindsight realize could made it even clearer an investigation after 1263 would require fuller normative late 13th century. ‘Hans Jacob Orning: h⊘ymiddelalderen’.. tidsskrift, 85(3): 641–647. Scholar]'s opposition (‘Hans Orning 2005. ‘Den materielle basis den kongemaktens utvikling 84(3): 455–469. (Norsk)[Crossref] , Scholar]: h⊘ymiddelalderen’, 84, 641–7). This discussed more elaborately 2008. Ages, Leiden: Brill. [Crossref] 2008, 4–5. 7. D⊘rum, Romerike riksintegreringen. Integreringen rikskonged⊘mmet perioden ca. 1000–1350. 8. ‘I gamle rettsordningen hadde manglet en virkelig ut⊘vende myndighet. Dette tomrommet kom kongemakten et stykke på vei til å fylle l⊘pet h⊘ymiddelalderen.’ (Helle, Under kirke kongemakt 1130–1319, 187), Helle, Norge blir stat, 179. 9. Paasche, Kong Sverre, 109–10. 10. Johnsen: Fra ættesamfunn statssamfunn, 100, 136. A notable exeption this line thought provided Lunden Lunden, Kåre. 1983. “‘Det konged⊘met h⊘gmellomalderen (ca. 1150–1319) – Funksjon, makt, legitimitet’.”. In Norske historikere utvalg IV, Edited by: Krag, C. 202–13. Universitetsforlaget. 1978 Scholar] (‘Det 1150–1319). legitimitet’, 202–13). peculiar historians. French Annales school Carolingan collapse 9th century Capetian recovery 12th labelled ‘feudal anarchy’ (Cf. ‘Kongemaktens lokale maktgrunnlag middelalderen’.. 85(4): 675–686. 10–28). 11. ‘Nå frykter verken lærde eller ulærde Gud gode menn. Snarere lever nå enhver som han lyster under lovl⊘s ordning’. middelalderdokumenter 1973. middelalderdokumenter., Bergen: Ed. trans. S. H. Smedsdal K. Helle 76–7. 12. 90–1; Johnsen, 91–2; 1995, 70. 13. Konungs skuggsiá. 14. ML II 3, H 1, F 15. White White, Stephen D. “‘A Crisis Fidelity c. 1000?’.”. Building Legitimacy: Political Discourses Forms Legitimacy Medieval Societies, Alfonso, I. 27–49. “Feudal Revolution”’, 205–23. articles Timothy Reuter, Dominic Barthelemy Chris Wickham Past Present 1996–97. 10–28. 16. Barthelemy, La mutation de l'an mille a‐t‐elle eu lieu?; ‘A crisis fidelity 1000?’, 27–49; Barton Barton, Richard E. Lordship County Maine, 890–1160, Woodbridge: Boydell 138–45. 17. Theodoricus munk: Historien om kongene, 87. 18. cites no international literature review, shows knowledge legal anthropological literature, though we debated several occasions earlier. He only relates research Sverre whom wrongly calls ‘master’ (he was supervisor thesis critical HT 2005). Dagfinn Skre Skre, Dagfinn. 1999. ‘Eiendom hierarki f⊘r‐ tidligstatlige samfunnet’.. Heimen, 36(2): 123–137. pointed at complete lack references debates Heimen (‘Eiendom samfunnet’, 132–3). concluding appeal last me (D⊘rum, 105), ‘Fokuset må også rettes mot andre land riker’ thus stands out eminent, probably unintended, irony, still offers comparison. 19. Iversen Iversen, Tore. 1996. ‘Jordleie, patroner klienter f⊘r h⊘ymiddelalderens leilendingevesen Norge’.. 33: 147–156. Norge’, 150 (‘selv meste D⊘rums empiri avvises, etter mitt skj⊘nn likevel hans manglende refleksjon over rammene, dvs. typen samfunn rikssamlingen, mest beklage’). 2006 104) refuses being classified agrarian historical having used half article sum up tradition (on pp. 94–101). 20. 142–5. Låke Berg aristocratic owners, Fyri split different parts, whereas Nes ecclesiastical ownership. 21. 145 viktigste holdepunktet slutte disse gårdene har vært kongsgårder veitslegårder forhold her ble ytt forpleining sengeplass konge jarl deres store f⊘lger. Det utelukket privatperson egen regning kunne skaffe mat, drikke senger så mange gjester, uansett hvor rik denne måtte være. var bare bli pålagt oppgaver slikt omfang’). addition, interpret size, central location, some vicinity churches, further indications royal however speculation. 22. 143 (‘Vi derfor anta gården konfiskert kongen rikssamlingstiden borgerkrigstiden, siden utlagt én flere stormenn’). almost similarly farm Berg, 186. 23. Emanuelsson, Kyrkojorden och dess ursprung. Oslo biskopsdöme ca 1000–ca 1400, 209. 24. ‘Det ingenting veien både Nordre S⊘ndre tidligere krongods’ 144). 25. svært sannsynlig blant 1000‐tallet la seg’ 26. ‘Etter min oppfatning kan ikke herske tvil ovenfor nevnte romeriksgårdene inngikk kongelig veitslesystem’ 145, 149). 27. 308, public duties i.e. witnesses, issuers, guarantors or judges connection cases preserved diplomas. 28. 310–1 personer utf⊘rt offentlighetsfunksjoner minst tre saker, viktige ofte hatt ombud hos kongen. Likeledes grunn godsrike eiendommer distrikter tilh⊘rt gruppen kongsmenn’). stated premise(!) p. 310: ‘Som hovedregel vi gå ut fra alle stormenn storb⊘nder begynnelsen 1300‐tallet sto kongstjeneste’. 29. Kjeldstadli, Fortida hva gang var, 128 (‘Valget står mellom anvende teori være, men forholde seg aktivt bevisst overlate selv sin ‘hverdagsteori’ (Jarle Simensen), sine mer mindre uklart formulerte antakelser’).
Scandinavian Journal of History