The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751: A Reply
Ian Wood
An author could not hope for two more qualified reviewers than Stephane Lebecq and Patrick Geary-both of whom have themselves written substantial works on Merovingian history. Nor I conceivably to defend myself against some the detailed points which they raised. Of course, Weidemann Matthias Werner ought been cited, although Henri Leclercq's analysis Bertram's will remains an extraordinary essay,' Namenforschung raises problems interpretation beyond scope my book, as Geary himself out. map coins balances was work Joachim Werner. If book ever reaches a second edition, such lapses are among first in need correction. It is perhaps valuable if respond, at least begin with, most general level. First, overestimated Mferovingians, suggests end his review? The problem with any modern assessment Merovingians that it has be pitched current assessments Anglo-Saxons, Irish, Visigoths, all championed one reason or another, sometimes nationalist scholarly. In political terms achievement sixth early seventh centuries infinitely greater neighboring state. its domination territory east Rhine exerted power way Romans would envied. And produced no Isidore Bede, cultural
French Historical Studies