No ‘Emperor of Europe’
Klaus Oschema
Recent research on the use of notion Europe during Middle Ages has confirmed that name continent only rarely acquired a political meaning, if at all, in this period. What is particularly surprising observation several authors Latin world used expressions such as regnum Europae or regna Europae, especially Carolingian period, without elaboration. Hence, although Charlemagne been praised ‘father Europe’ by one contemporary author, idea an ‘Emperor was never developed, with exception two brief notices early medieval Irish annalistic compilations. Even High Ages, when came to be more widely different contexts, small set figures, historical well fictitious, were ascribed aspiration quality ruling all Europe. Towards end however, became common particular context: Christian accused non-Christian rulers Asian origin (Mongols, Turks) seeking subdue entire continent. authors, turn, started perceive being home Christendom. This article demonstrates how those accept pluralistic order for their own (on level), and contrasts quest hegemonic rule becomes motive polemic, which they ascribe rulers. Although arguments do not lead explicit presentation ‘continent freedom’, recognise value existence multitude entities contrast homogenous role ‘Asian tyrants’. In broader perspective, these findings open insights into late thought go beyond what we can learn from ‘political discussion’ limited sense.
Medieval History Journal