The Nature and the Image of Princely Power in Kievan Rus’, 980–1054 by Walter K. Hanak
Lucas McMahon
Reviewed by: The Nature and the Image of Princely Power in Kievan Rus’, 980–1054 by Walter K. Hanak Lucas McMahon Hanak, (Leiden: Brill 2013) xviii + 203pp. This book is an updated published version Hanak’s 1973 Indiana University doctoral thesis, “The Grand Russia: 980–1054.” goal to examine what sources say about royal power Rus’. lands upon which Vladimir I (r. 980–1015) Jaroslav 1019–1054) reigned were subject a variety influences, notably from existing Slavic structures conquered Riurikid dynasty, Scandinavian Varangians who travelled down rivers established themselves Kiev other centers, decrepit but still powerful Jewish Khazar state, ideological lure Byzantium (and consequently, Christianity) south. not attempting argue that certain influence prevailed over others, rather their variety, how they appear sources, attempt interpret them. Thus this heavily concerned with close reading so-called Russian Primary Chronicle, abbreviated as PVL Slavonic characters throughout, although material receives examination well. first chapter lays some groundwork for understanding Vladimir’s reign primarily conversion Christianity introduced new way writing princely power. convincingly argues Chronicle presents Solomon, drawing long list similarities between Rus’ prince Old Testament king. Later, he notes occasionally problematic following stories, indicating was [End Page 259] only lens through legitimacy could be viewed While Jaroslav’s did precisely follow model story Divided Kingdom after Solomon’s death, proved his worth fighting Pechenegs, more traditionally Varangian exercise second Byzantine conceptions Much deals law relationship clergy, latter complicated unclear relations degree falling under Constantinople. Byzantinization office uneven, while it provided formulation office, fears being culturally religiously enveloped Constantinople caused them maintain distance. next three chapters, altogether shorter than 1 alone, discuss Varangian, Khazar, influences on imperial representation. strong receding well-disguised preferred see or precedents Scandinavian. establishment centralized state Vladimir, however, led decline customs keep together. particularly useful since manages bring many subtle Nordic practice light. ideas accurately titled Khazars Shadows Political Thought,” one needs emphasize just “shadowy” those are. brings up few examples dual kingship discusses term “khagan” applied both Jaroslav. brief shows probably present, traces are very limited. final organizations affected kingship. princes, military commanders, urban popular assemblies identified primary institutions had voice Ultimately, none seem have major role, expend effort marginalize problems minor. A small selection typos can found throughout. Although few, these errors should survived Brill’s editorial process...
Comitatus-a Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies