PMC9768029_01
PMC9768029_02
PMC9768029_03
PMC9768029_04
PMC9768029_05
PMC9768029_06
PMC9768029_07
PMC9768029_08
PMC9768029_09
PMC9768029_10
PMC9768029_11
PMC9768029_12
PMC9768029_13
PMC9768029_14
PMC9768029_15
PMC9768029_16
Level of participation of each team role per PAR phase per pilot initiative.
fdgth-04-1006447-g002.jpg
PMC9768029_16_fdgth-04-1006447-g002.jpg
F2
An overview of Figure 2 reveals that the participation level according to each group was Developers (33.1%), Researchers (31.5%), Physicians (17.1%), Nurses (15.0%), and Patients (3.2%).
Diagram of the features of the three previously developed pilot initiatives. Each category is represented with a letter and a color: must-have - Mo (blue), should-have - S (green), could-have Co (yellow), and will not have this time - W (red).
fdgth-04-1006447-g003.jpg
PMC9768029_16_fdgth-04-1006447-g003.jpg
F3
Figure 3 illustrates the feature prioritization for development.
Different contributions according to PAR team role.
fdgth-04-1006447-g004.jpg
PMC9768029_16_fdgth-04-1006447-g004.jpg
F4
Distribution of meetings per phase.
fdgth-04-1006447-g005.jpg
PMC9768029_16_fdgth-04-1006447-g005.jpg
F5
The approach involved two action-reflection cycles illustrated in Figure 5.