PMC8580670_01
(a) Intraoral frontal view of the patient teeth preoperatively. (b) Panoramic X-ray view of the patient teeth preoperatively.
CRID2021-8470222.001.jpg
PMC8580670_01_CRID2021-8470222.001.jpg
fig1
However, localized horizontal bone loss was evident in the posterior area, especially in the maxillary right posterior area with maxillary sinus pneumatization (Figure 1).
(a) Diagnostic wax-up illustrating the desired corrected tooth relationship. (b) Diagnostic mock-up intraorally.
CRID2021-8470222.002.jpg
PMC8580670_01_CRID2021-8470222.002.jpg
fig2
At the mock visit, esthetics, phonetics, and function were initially evaluated and were confirmed satisfactory (Figure 2).
The extraction site with the maxillary anterior teeth after preparation at the follow-up appointment two weeks after extraction.
CRID2021-8470222.003.jpg
PMC8580670_01_CRID2021-8470222.003.jpg
fig3
After removing the maxillary anterior provisionals, the tissue maturation around the extraction site was confirmed satisfactory (Figure 3).
Final impression after tooth preparation using vinyl polysiloxane impression material.
CRID2021-8470222.004.jpg
PMC8580670_01_CRID2021-8470222.004.jpg
fig4
Then, gingival displacement was performed using the double retraction cord technique proceeded by making the final impression (Figure 4) using light- and medium-body vinyl polysiloxane impression material (3M Imprint; United States).
Postoperative intraoral frontal view of the full-coverage restorations illustrating the corrected occlusal relationship.
CRID2021-8470222.005.jpg
PMC8580670_01_CRID2021-8470222.005.jpg
fig5
Missing teeth #14 and#15 were replaced by monolithic zirconia FDP, while teeth from #12 to #25 were designed to have lithium disilicate full-coverage restorations, including the FDP replacing #22 (Figure 5).