PMC9477617_01
Extrusion of the distal tip of the Hydrus stent from Schlemm's canal.
JOPH2022-1605195.001.jpg
PMC9477617_01_JOPH2022-1605195.001.jpg
fig1
Imaging of the procedure with the GS-1 showed an extrusion of the distal tip of the Hydrus stent from Schlemm's canal, pictured in Figure 1.
PMC9477617_02
Distal extrusion of the Hydrus stent from Schlemm's canal.
JOPH2022-1605195.002.jpg
PMC9477617_02_JOPH2022-1605195.002.jpg
fig2
Imaging of the ICA showed distal extrusion of the Hydrus stent from Schlemm's canal, as seen in Figure 2.
PMC9477617_03
Hydrus stent distal tip mispositioned posterior to, rather than into, Schlemm's canal.
JOPH2022-1605195.003.jpg
PMC9477617_03_JOPH2022-1605195.003.jpg
fig3
Imaging of the angle, as pictured in Figure 3, showed the Hydrus stent distal tip mispositioned posterior to, rather than into, Schlemm's canal.
PMC9477617_04
Extrusion of the distal tip of the Hydrus stent from Schlemm's canal.
JOPH2022-1605195.004.jpg
PMC9477617_04_JOPH2022-1605195.004.jpg
fig4
Gonioscopy and imaging of the procedure with the GS-1 showed an extrusion of the distal tip of the Hydrus stent from Schlemm's canal, as seen in Figure 4.
PMC9477617_05
Hydrus stent not fully positioned and adjacent goniotomy seen performed by Sinskey hook.
JOPH2022-1605195.005.jpg
PMC9477617_05_JOPH2022-1605195.005.jpg
fig5
GS-1 imaging showed incomplete insertion of the Hydrus stent with an adjacent goniotomy, as shown in Figure 5.