PMC8084688_01
Frontal view of the patient.
CRID2021-5585181.001.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.001.jpg
fig1
Hospital Centre Zagreb after resection of the mandible due to OPC that was surgically treated in April 2015 (Figures 1 and 2).
Panoramic image.
CRID2021-5585181.002.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.002.jpg
fig2
Hospital Centre Zagreb after resection of the mandible due to OPC that was surgically treated in April 2015 (Figures 1 and 2).
Intraoral situation before surgery.
CRID2021-5585181.003.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.003.jpg
fig3
On initial examination, an edentulous mandible was found with a narrow zone of attached mucosa, preventing the fabrication of a satisfactory full denture (Figure 3).
Insertion of Trabecular Metal  Dental Implants (Zimmer Biomet, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA).
CRID2021-5585181.004.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.004.jpg
fig4
Three Zimmer Biomet Trabecular Metal  implants (4.1 x 10 mm) were inserted in the area of lower left first incisor, lower left second premolar, and lower right second premolar with a maximum insertion torque of 25 Ncm (Figures 4-6).
Clinical view after insertion.
CRID2021-5585181.005.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.005.jpg
fig5
Three Zimmer Biomet Trabecular Metal  implants (4.1 x 10 mm) were inserted in the area of lower left first incisor, lower left second premolar, and lower right second premolar with a maximum insertion torque of 25 Ncm (Figures 4-6).
Situation after removing transfers.
CRID2021-5585181.006.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.006.jpg
fig6
Three Zimmer Biomet Trabecular Metal  implants (4.1 x 10 mm) were inserted in the area of lower left first incisor, lower left second premolar, and lower right second premolar with a maximum insertion torque of 25 Ncm (Figures 4-6).
Postoperative panoramic image.
CRID2021-5585181.007.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.007.jpg
fig7
Four months after implant placement (Figure 7), the implants were reopened and gingival formers were placed (Figure 8).
Placing gingival healing abutments.
CRID2021-5585181.008.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.008.jpg
fig8
Four months after implant placement (Figure 7), the implants were reopened and gingival formers were placed (Figure 8).
Transfers for open-tray impression.
CRID2021-5585181.009.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.009.jpg
fig9
Two weeks later, anatomical and functional impressions of both jaws were taken for the production of a new upper partial denture and the bar-retained mandibular overdenture (Figures 9-11).
Maxillomandibular relationship.
CRID2021-5585181.010.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.010.jpg
fig10
Two weeks later, anatomical and functional impressions of both jaws were taken for the production of a new upper partial denture and the bar-retained mandibular overdenture (Figures 9-11).
Individual milled bar for retaining mandibular overdenture.
CRID2021-5585181.011.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.011.jpg
fig11
Two weeks later, anatomical and functional impressions of both jaws were taken for the production of a new upper partial denture and the bar-retained mandibular overdenture (Figures 9-11).
Upper partial denture and the bar-retained mandibular overdenture.
CRID2021-5585181.012.jpg
PMC8084688_01_CRID2021-5585181.012.jpg
fig12
Three weeks later, new dentures were given to the patient (Figure 12).