PMC9881488_01
Ultrasound image with white arrow pointing to poorly defined mass within endometrial cavity. Red arrow indicates area where uterine fundus should be but was not well seen.
jmc-14-007-g001.jpg
PMC9881488_01_jmc-14-007-g001.jpg
F1
These findings were suggestive of a fibroid polyp but as the uterine fundus was not well seen, inversion of the uterine fundus could not be ruled out (Figs. 1, 2).
Ultrasound image with Doppler blood flow showing blood vessels extending from the uterine fundus and anterior wall of the uterus into the mass.
jmc-14-007-g002.jpg
PMC9881488_01_jmc-14-007-g002.jpg
F2
These findings were suggestive of a fibroid polyp but as the uterine fundus was not well seen, inversion of the uterine fundus could not be ruled out (Figs. 1, 2).
Prolapsed mass at introitus.
jmc-14-007-g003.jpg
PMC9881488_01_jmc-14-007-g003.jpg
F3
On examination, there was a prolapsed mass measuring 5 cm at the introitus with a 3-cm thick stalk (Fig. 3).
Image from diagnostic laparoscopy with arrow indicating site of uterine inversion with bilateral tubes and ovarian ligaments pulled in.
jmc-14-007-g004.jpg
PMC9881488_01_jmc-14-007-g004.jpg
F4
Decision was made for diagnostic laparoscopy, which confirmed that there was complete uterine inversion (Fig. 4).
Computed tomography scan image (axial section) with white arrow indicating heterogenous hypodensity within the endometrial cavity.
jmc-14-007-g005.jpg
PMC9881488_01_jmc-14-007-g005.jpg
F5
Staging computed tomography (CT) scans of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis showed no distant metastasis or systemic adenopathy (Figs. 5, 6).
Computer tomography scan image (sagittal section) with white arrow indicating heterogenous hypodensity within the endometrial cavity which possibly extends to the endocervical canal.
jmc-14-007-g006.jpg
PMC9881488_01_jmc-14-007-g006.jpg
F6
Staging computed tomography (CT) scans of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis showed no distant metastasis or systemic adenopathy (Figs. 5, 6).