PMC7479477_01
Colposcopy.
CRIOG2020-8492036.001.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.001.jpg
fig1
However, it drew the clinical suspicion of the attending gynecologist as an "atypical lesion" which necessitated further thorough evaluation (Figure 1).
Transvaginal scan image.
CRIOG2020-8492036.002.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.002.jpg
fig2
Analogously with the speculum inspection, TVS revealed at the site of the "discolored lesion" a hyperechogenic area and the relevant acoustic shadow was depicted (Figure 2).
Pap smear.
CRIOG2020-8492036.003.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.003.jpg
fig3
According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
Pap smear.
CRIOG2020-8492036.004.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.004.jpg
fig4
According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
Pap smear.
CRIOG2020-8492036.005.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.005.jpg
fig5
According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
Pap smear.
CRIOG2020-8492036.006.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.006.jpg
fig6
According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
Pap smear.
CRIOG2020-8492036.007.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.007.jpg
fig7
According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
Histology.
CRIOG2020-8492036.008.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.008.jpg
fig8
The histological result confirmed both the clinical impression and the cytological result leading to the diagnosis of "infiltration of the cervix by leukemic blasts" (Figures 8 and 9).
Histology.
CRIOG2020-8492036.009.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.009.jpg
fig9
The histological result confirmed both the clinical impression and the cytological result leading to the diagnosis of "infiltration of the cervix by leukemic blasts" (Figures 8 and 9).
MIB 1/Ki-67: positive 100%.
CRIOG2020-8492036.010.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.010.jpg
fig10
The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
CD34: weak positive.
CRIOG2020-8492036.011.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.011.jpg
fig11
The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
CD45: positive.
CRIOG2020-8492036.012.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.012.jpg
fig12
The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
CD20: weak positive.
CRIOG2020-8492036.013.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.013.jpg
fig13
The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
CD79A: positive.
CRIOG2020-8492036.014.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.014.jpg
fig14
The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
CD10: positive.
CRIOG2020-8492036.015.jpg
PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.015.jpg
fig15
The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).