PMC4484343_01
Range of motion: wrist flexion/extension.
TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
PMC4484343_05_TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
F2B
Long-term radioulnar joint congruency (6 years following injury) was not symmetric between the injured and non-injured wrist as shown on the proximity maps (Figure 3C). Inferred high contact regions on the injured wrist revealed a decreased surface area (3.5% of the overall surface area) on the distal radius compared to the non-injured side (16.8% of the overall surface area) indicating that the injured wrist is less reduced at the DRUJ compared to the non-injured wrist (Figure 3D). Radiographically this patient had acceptable radiographic parameters at baseline, following treatment and at her short-term follow-up (according the ASSH standards) (Table 2, Fig. 3D). However, radiographs show a loss of volar tilt following treatment (Fig. 3D). Her non-injured wrist also appears to be in the neutral alignment in the sagittal plane (Fig. 3D).
PMC4484343_02
Range of motion: ulnar/radial deviation. Values are shown for the Injured and Non-injured Wrist at Baseline (3 months), One
Year following Injury and at Long-term Follow-up. Values are compared against cohort values previously published. Values are marked to
indicate high (>+20%) and low (<20%) compared to cohort values.
TOORTHJ-9-168_F2A.jpg
PMC4484343_04_TOORTHJ-9-168_F2A.jpg
F2A
ROM was excellent and continued to be at her long term follow-up visit with the exception of a 35  reduction in supination on her injured wrist (Fig. 2C). Radiographically this patient had high radial inclination at baseline and healed in this alignment as seen in long term follow-up radiographs and appears to be approximately 10  more inclined than the non-injured wrist (but still in the acceptable range according to ASSH standards) (Table 2, Fig. 3C).
Range of motion: wrist flexion/extension.
TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
PMC4484343_05_TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
F2B
Long-term radioulnar joint congruency (6 years following injury) was not symmetric between the injured and non-injured wrist as shown on the proximity maps (Figure 3C). Inferred high contact regions on the injured wrist revealed a decreased surface area (3.5% of the overall surface area) on the distal radius compared to the non-injured side (16.8% of the overall surface area) indicating that the injured wrist is less reduced at the DRUJ compared to the non-injured wrist (Figure 3D). Radiographically this patient had acceptable radiographic parameters at baseline, following treatment and at her short-term follow-up (according the ASSH standards) (Table 2, Fig. 3D). However, radiographs show a loss of volar tilt following treatment (Fig. 3D). Her non-injured wrist also appears to be in the neutral alignment in the sagittal plane (Fig. 3D).
PMC4484343_03
Range of motion: ulnar/radial deviation. Values are shown for the Injured and Non-injured Wrist at Baseline (3 months), One
Year following Injury and at Long-term Follow-up. Values are compared against cohort values previously published. Values are marked to
indicate high (>+20%) and low (<20%) compared to cohort values.
TOORTHJ-9-168_F2A.jpg
PMC4484343_04_TOORTHJ-9-168_F2A.jpg
F2A
ROM was excellent and continued to be at her long term follow-up visit with the exception of a 35  reduction in supination on her injured wrist (Fig. 2C). Radiographically this patient had high radial inclination at baseline and healed in this alignment as seen in long term follow-up radiographs and appears to be approximately 10  more inclined than the non-injured wrist (but still in the acceptable range according to ASSH standards) (Table 2, Fig. 3C).
Range of motion: wrist flexion/extension.
TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
PMC4484343_05_TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
F2B
Long-term radioulnar joint congruency (6 years following injury) was not symmetric between the injured and non-injured wrist as shown on the proximity maps (Figure 3C). Inferred high contact regions on the injured wrist revealed a decreased surface area (3.5% of the overall surface area) on the distal radius compared to the non-injured side (16.8% of the overall surface area) indicating that the injured wrist is less reduced at the DRUJ compared to the non-injured wrist (Figure 3D). Radiographically this patient had acceptable radiographic parameters at baseline, following treatment and at her short-term follow-up (according the ASSH standards) (Table 2, Fig. 3D). However, radiographs show a loss of volar tilt following treatment (Fig. 3D). Her non-injured wrist also appears to be in the neutral alignment in the sagittal plane (Fig. 3D).
PMC4484343_04
Range of motion: ulnar/radial deviation. Values are shown for the Injured and Non-injured Wrist at Baseline (3 months), One
Year following Injury and at Long-term Follow-up. Values are compared against cohort values previously published. Values are marked to
indicate high (>+20%) and low (<20%) compared to cohort values.
TOORTHJ-9-168_F2A.jpg
PMC4484343_04_TOORTHJ-9-168_F2A.jpg
F2A
ROM was excellent and continued to be at her long term follow-up visit with the exception of a 35  reduction in supination on her injured wrist (Fig. 2C). Radiographically this patient had high radial inclination at baseline and healed in this alignment as seen in long term follow-up radiographs and appears to be approximately 10  more inclined than the non-injured wrist (but still in the acceptable range according to ASSH standards) (Table 2, Fig. 3C).
Range of motion: wrist flexion/extension.
TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
PMC4484343_05_TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
F2B
Long-term radioulnar joint congruency (6 years following injury) was not symmetric between the injured and non-injured wrist as shown on the proximity maps (Figure 3C). Inferred high contact regions on the injured wrist revealed a decreased surface area (3.5% of the overall surface area) on the distal radius compared to the non-injured side (16.8% of the overall surface area) indicating that the injured wrist is less reduced at the DRUJ compared to the non-injured wrist (Figure 3D). Radiographically this patient had acceptable radiographic parameters at baseline, following treatment and at her short-term follow-up (according the ASSH standards) (Table 2, Fig. 3D). However, radiographs show a loss of volar tilt following treatment (Fig. 3D). Her non-injured wrist also appears to be in the neutral alignment in the sagittal plane (Fig. 3D).
PMC4484343_05
Range of motion: wrist flexion/extension.
TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
PMC4484343_05_TOORTHJ-9-168_F2B.jpg
F2B
Long-term radioulnar joint congruency (6 years following injury) was not symmetric between the injured and non-injured wrist as shown on the proximity maps (Figure 3C). Inferred high contact regions on the injured wrist revealed a decreased surface area (3.5% of the overall surface area) on the distal radius compared to the non-injured side (16.8% of the overall surface area) indicating that the injured wrist is less reduced at the DRUJ compared to the non-injured wrist (Figure 3D). Radiographically this patient had acceptable radiographic parameters at baseline, following treatment and at her short-term follow-up (according the ASSH standards) (Table 2, Fig. 3D). However, radiographs show a loss of volar tilt following treatment (Fig. 3D). Her non-injured wrist also appears to be in the neutral alignment in the sagittal plane (Fig. 3D).