PMC6487135_01
Baseline front view.
CRID2019-8609547.001.jpg
PMC6487135_01_CRID2019-8609547.001.jpg
fig1
The gingival overgrowth appeared as localized nodular enlargement of the interdental papilla (Figures 1-3).
Baseline right side view.
CRID2019-8609547.002.jpg
PMC6487135_01_CRID2019-8609547.002.jpg
fig2
The gingival overgrowth appeared as localized nodular enlargement of the interdental papilla (Figures 1-3).
Baseline left side view.
CRID2019-8609547.003.jpg
PMC6487135_01_CRID2019-8609547.003.jpg
fig3
The gingival overgrowth appeared as localized nodular enlargement of the interdental papilla (Figures 1-3).
Baseline radiographic examination.
CRID2019-8609547.004.jpg
PMC6487135_01_CRID2019-8609547.004.jpg
fig4
X-ray examination showed a marginal (coronal third) horizontal alveolar bone loss which was more pronounced at the lower incisors (Figure 4).
Final front view 2 years post treatment.
CRID2019-8609547.005.jpg
PMC6487135_01_CRID2019-8609547.005.jpg
fig5
The last clinical and X-ray evaluation after 2 years of regular follow-up shows the good stability of the results (Figures 5-8).
Final right side view 2 years post treatment.
CRID2019-8609547.006.jpg
PMC6487135_01_CRID2019-8609547.006.jpg
fig6
The last clinical and X-ray evaluation after 2 years of regular follow-up shows the good stability of the results (Figures 5-8).
Final left side view 2 years post treatment.
CRID2019-8609547.007.jpg
PMC6487135_01_CRID2019-8609547.007.jpg
fig7
The last clinical and X-ray evaluation after 2 years of regular follow-up shows the good stability of the results (Figures 5-8).
Final periapical radiographs 2 years post treatment.
CRID2019-8609547.008.jpg
PMC6487135_01_CRID2019-8609547.008.jpg
fig8
The last clinical and X-ray evaluation after 2 years of regular follow-up shows the good stability of the results (Figures 5-8).