PMC10088052_01
CT scan abdomen/pelvis with contrast showing large soft tissue density mass inseparable from the lesser curvature of the stomach marked with asterisk.
acc-10-01-50-g001.jpg
PMC10088052_01_acc-10-01-50-g001.jpg
f1
Computerized tomography (CT) scan of chest/abdomen/pelvis showed gastric mass measuring 25x19.6x11.4 cm with no evidence of metastatic disease in the abdomen or pelvis (Figure 1).
EGD findings consistent with a large, bilobed subepithelial mass measuring 10-15 cm with an area of ulceration within the mass (seen best on retroflexion) was found on the lesser curvature of the stomach along the anterior wall of the stomach.
acc-10-01-50-g002.jpg
PMC10088052_01_acc-10-01-50-g002.jpg
f2
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) demonstrated large, bilobed subepithelial mass measuring 10-15 cm with an area of ulceration within the mass (Figure 2) followed up with Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) demonstrating subepithelial lesion was found likely arising from the fundus, lesser curve and body of the stomach, layer of origin could not be determined on due to the large size of the mass (Figure 3).
Endoscopic US findings showed a 43.0x77.8 mm subepithelial lesion found likely arising from the fundus, lesser curve and body of the stomach s/p FNB x 4. The lesion was hypoechoic and had some cystic spaces within it in some areas. Sonographically, the lesion appeared to originate from the stomach, but the wall layers could not be determined due to the large size of the mass.
acc-10-01-50-g003.jpg
PMC10088052_01_acc-10-01-50-g003.jpg
f3
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) demonstrated large, bilobed subepithelial mass measuring 10-15 cm with an area of ulceration within the mass (Figure 2) followed up with Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) demonstrating subepithelial lesion was found likely arising from the fundus, lesser curve and body of the stomach, layer of origin could not be determined on due to the large size of the mass (Figure 3).