PMC6517600_01
Descriptive data for participant 1's Albert's test and line bisection.
fneur-10-00474-g0002.jpg
PMC6517600_01_fneur-10-00474-g0002.jpg
F2
Also, it is important to note that the 6th session was worse than the pre-test of the 1st session (Figure 2). Scores slightly decreased when compared between average of all 6 sessions' pre- (mean scores = 14.5) and follow-up test (scores = 14) (Figure 2). However, there was no significant difference in pre-and post-interventions (Figure 2). Test for Participant 1 increased from 25.65 to 27.18%, showing some deterioration (Figure 2). The percentage of deviation in the follow-up test (27.18%) was inside of 95% confidence intervals of pre-test [21.40, 29.89] indicating no significant difference between follow-up score and the averaged pre-test percentage deviations of the 6 training sessions.
PMC6517600_02
Descriptive data for participant 2's Albert's test and line bisection.
fneur-10-00474-g0003.jpg
PMC6517600_02_fneur-10-00474-g0003.jpg
F3
Also, in sessions 1-6 all posttest scores improved over pretest except the last session (remained same), which indicated positive outcomes in within-session effects of MNT (Figure 3). Scores decreased from averaged pre-tests (mean scores = 9.5) to follow-up test (score = 7) showing improvements over pretest performance and maintenance of benefits after posttest (Figure 3). However, the averaged percentage of deviation from pre-test to post-test decreased about 1.2% (Figure 3). Percentage deviations decreased from 10.39 to 7.70% (Figure 3).