PMC6146902_01
(a) Appearance of teeth in the half-open position. (b) Position of teeth in occlusion. (c) Lip position during a smile, smile line, and teeth visibility.
CRID2018-4601795.001.jpg
PMC6146902_01_CRID2018-4601795.001.jpg
fig1
Moreover, the right canine tooth was identified as a Turner's tooth according to the patient's anamnesis. (Figure 1).
(a) Application of the acid gel. (b) Washing with a water spray. (c) Application of an ethanol drier. (d) Application of a low-viscosity resin infiltrate. (e) Polymerization. (f) Immediately after application.
CRID2018-4601795.002.jpg
PMC6146902_01_CRID2018-4601795.002.jpg
fig2
Finally, a light curing accessory was used for polymerization and polishing for 40 s. (Figure 2).
(a) Tooth was determined as A3 on the Vita scale. (b) Bleaching agent was applied. (c) Tooth was determined as A2 on the Vita scale.
CRID2018-4601795.003.jpg
PMC6146902_01_CRID2018-4601795.003.jpg
fig3
The application took 40 min in one session, and the color of the tooth was determined as A2 on the Vita scale (Figure 3).
(a) Overlapped preparation. (b) Application of laminate veneer.
CRID2018-4601795.004.jpg
PMC6146902_01_CRID2018-4601795.004.jpg
fig4
Trios, Copenhagen, Denmark). The designed laminate veneer was produced with a CAM system (Coritec 550i, imes-icore, Eiterfeld, Germany) using lithium disilicate glass ceramic blocks (IPS e-max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The restorations were glazed in the laboratory and then cemented with adhesive cement (Panavia V5 Clear, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) following the recommendations of the manufacturer (Figure 4).
(a) Posttreatment. (b) One-year follow-up.
CRID2018-4601795.005.jpg
PMC6146902_01_CRID2018-4601795.005.jpg
fig5
The examination of the restorations after 1 year did not reveal any clinical failures (Figure 5).