PMC10314815_01
Patient's intraoral maxilla scans before the orthodontic treatment.
CRID2023-1831125.001.jpg
PMC10314815_01_CRID2023-1831125.001.jpg
fig1
Recessions categorized as I class by Miller were noted in the area of teeth 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5, which were the part of patient's complaint regarding esthetic profile compromise (Figures 1 and 2).
Patient's intraoral bite scans before the orthodontic treatment.
CRID2023-1831125.002.jpg
PMC10314815_01_CRID2023-1831125.002.jpg
fig2
Recessions categorized as I class by Miller were noted in the area of teeth 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5, which were the part of patient's complaint regarding esthetic profile compromise (Figures 1 and 2).
Patient's intraoral maxilla scans by the end of orthodontic treatment.
CRID2023-1831125.003.jpg
PMC10314815_01_CRID2023-1831125.003.jpg
fig3
Both clinical examination and provided digital analysis of obtained intraoral scans revealed improvement of gingival margins at the area of teeth 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 (Figures 3 and 4).
Patient's intraoral bite scans by the end of orthodontic treatment.
CRID2023-1831125.004.jpg
PMC10314815_01_CRID2023-1831125.004.jpg
fig4
Both clinical examination and provided digital analysis of obtained intraoral scans revealed improvement of gingival margins at the area of teeth 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 (Figures 3 and 4).