PMC7522529_01
Inflammatory tumefaction opposite the scar at 10 days post operative (* tumefaction).
gr1.jpg
PMC7522529_01_gr1.jpg
fig0005
The pain progressively worsened on day 20 postoperatively, until objective physical examination revealed a subcutaneous inflammatory mass opposite the scar (Fig. 1).
Axial MRA T1 of the pseudoaneurysm of a superficial branch of the ulnar artery.
gr2.jpg
PMC7522529_01_gr2.jpg
fig0010
A Doppler ultrasound was performed showing a pseudoaneurysm of a cutaneous perforating artery of the ulnar artery which was confirmed by an MR angiography (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4).
MRA of the pseudoaneurysm of a superficial branch of the ulnar artery.
gr4.jpg
PMC7522529_01_gr4.jpg
fig0020
A Doppler ultrasound was performed showing a pseudoaneurysm of a cutaneous perforating artery of the ulnar artery which was confirmed by an MR angiography (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4).
Ulnar pseudoaneurysm with thrombosis.
gr5.jpg
PMC7522529_01_gr5.jpg
fig0025
An under skin pinkish colored mass of 3 cm in diameter was found, which was renitent on palpation with thrombotic contents (Fig. 5).
Scar at 3 months post operative.
gr6.jpg
PMC7522529_01_gr6.jpg
fig0030
At 3 months post-operative, there was no sign of recurrence (Fig. 6).