code: def test_large_model_issue(self):
      qa_pipeline = pipeline(
          "question-answering",
          model="mrm8488/bert-multi-cased-finetuned-xquadv1",
      )
      outputs = qa_pipeline(
          {
              "context": (
                  "Yes Bank founder Rana Kapoor has approached the Bombay High Court, challenging a special court's"
                  " order from August this year that had remanded him in police custody for a week in a multi-crore"
                  " loan fraud case. Kapoor, who is currently lodged in Taloja Jail, is an accused in the loan fraud"
                  " case and some related matters being probed by the CBI and Enforcement Directorate. A single"
                  " bench presided over by Justice S K Shinde on Tuesday posted the plea for further hearing on"
                  " October 14. In his plea filed through advocate Vijay Agarwal, Kapoor claimed that the special"
                  " court's order permitting the CBI's request for police custody on August 14 was illegal and in"
                  " breach of the due process of law. Therefore, his police custody and subsequent judicial custody"
                  " in the case were all illegal. Kapoor has urged the High Court to quash and set aside the special"
                  " court's order dated August 14. As per his plea, in August this year, the CBI had moved two"
                  " applications before the special court, one seeking permission to arrest Kapoor, who was already"
                  " in judicial custody at the time in another case, and the other, seeking his police custody."
                  " While the special court refused to grant permission to the CBI to arrest Kapoor, it granted the"
                  " central agency's plea for his custody. Kapoor, however, said in his plea that before filing an"
                  " application for his arrest, the CBI had not followed the process of issuing him a notice under"
                  " Section 41 of the CrPC for appearance before it. He further said that the CBI had not taken"
                  " prior sanction as mandated under section 17 A of the Prevention of Corruption Act for"
                  " prosecuting him. The special court, however, had said in its order at the time that as Kapoor"
                  " was already in judicial custody in another case and was not a free man the procedure mandated"
                  " under Section 41 of the CrPC need not have been adhered to as far as issuing a prior notice of"
                  " appearance was concerned. ADVERTISING It had also said that case records showed that the"
                  " investigating officer had taken an approval from a managing director of Yes Bank before"
                  " beginning the proceedings against Kapoor and such a permission was a valid sanction. However,"
                  " Kapoor in his plea said that the above order was bad in law and sought that it be quashed and"
                  " set aside. The law mandated that if initial action was not in consonance with legal procedures,"
                  " then all subsequent actions must be held as illegal, he said, urging the High Court to declare"
                  " the CBI remand and custody and all subsequent proceedings including the further custody as"
                  " illegal and void ab-initio. In a separate plea before the High Court, Kapoor's daughter Rakhee"
                  " Kapoor-Tandon has sought exemption from in-person appearance before a special PMLA court. Rakhee"
                  " has stated that she is a resident of the United Kingdom and is unable to travel to India owing"
                  " to restrictions imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the CBI, in the present case,"
                  " Kapoor had obtained a gratification or pecuniary advantage of ₹ 307 crore, and thereby caused"
                  " Yes Bank a loss of ₹ 1,800 crore by extending credit facilities to Avantha Group, when it was"
                  " not eligible for the same"
              ),
              "question": "Is this person invovled in fraud?",
          }
      )
      self.assertEqual(
          nested_simplify(outputs),
          {
              "answer": "an accused in the loan fraud case",
              "end": 294,
              "score": 0.001,
              "start": 261,
          },
      )
  
imports: import unittest
  from transformers import MODEL_FOR_QUESTION_ANSWERING_MAPPING, TF_MODEL_FOR_QUESTION_ANSWERING_MAPPING, LxmertConfig, QuestionAnsweringPipeline
  from transformers.data.processors.squad import SquadExample
  from transformers.pipelines import QuestionAnsweringArgumentHandler, pipeline
  from transformers.testing_utils import nested_simplify, require_tf, require_torch, require_torch_or_tf, slow
  from .test_pipelines_common import ANY, PipelineTestCaseMeta
label_desc: Use image node_id 10 for calling the QAPipelineTests obj's underlying member method code with example usage: obj.test_large_model_issue() without return types