An Introduction to the Discharging Method via Graph Coloring

Abstract: We provide a "how-to" guide to the use and application of the Discharging Method. Our aim is not to exhaustively survey results proved by this technique, but rather to demystify the technique and facilitate its wider use, using applications in graph coloring as examples. Along the way, we present some new proofs and new problems.

\section{Introduction}
The Discharging Method has been used in graph theory for more than 100 years.
Its most famous application is the proof of the Four Color Theorem,
stating that graphs embeddable in the plane have chromatic number at most $4$.
Nevetheless, the method remains a mystery to many graph theorists.  Our purpose
in this guide is to explain its use in order to make the method more widely
accessible.  Although we mention many applications, such as stronger versions
of results proved here, cataloguing applications is not our aim.  For a survey
of applications in coloring of plane graphs we refer the reader to
Borodin~\cite{Bsurv}.

Discharging is a tool in a two-pronged approach to inductive proofs.  It can
be viewed as an amortized counting argument used to prove that a global
hypothesis guarantees the existence of some desirable local configuration.
In an application of the resulting structure theorem, one shows that each
such local configuration cannot occur in a minimal counterexample to the
desired conclusion.  More precisely, a configuration is {\it reducible} for
a graph property if it cannot occur in a minimal graph failing that property.
This leads to the phrase ``an unavoidable set of reducible configurations'' to
describe the overall process.

The relationship between the average and the minimum in a set of numbers
provides a trivial example of such global/local implications: if the average
in a set of numbers is less than $k$ (global hypothesis), then some number in
the set is less than $k$ (local conclusion).  Many analogous structure theorems
in graph theory state that a bound on the average vertex degree forces some
sparse local structure.

Discharging enables vertex degrees to be reallocated to reach a global bound.
For example, each vertex may start with a ``charge'' equal to its degree.  To
show that average degree less than $b$ forces the presence of a configuration
in a specified set $S$ of sparse local configurations, we show that their
absence allows charge to be moved (via ``discharging rules'') so that the final
charge at each vertex is at least $b$, violating the hypothesis.

The discharging argument yields a structure theorem quite separate from the
induction step showing reducibility of the configurations.  Thus the
unavoidable set resulting from a particular sparseness condition may be
reusable to prove other results.  However, usually the set of configurations is
tailored to the desired application: all must be shown to be reducible for the
property stated as the conclusion of the theorem.

We present a variety of classical applications, some with new proofs.  Although
we emphasize discharging arguments, we include many reducibility arguments to
show the techniques used in applying the discharging results.  For clarity and
simplicity, many of the results we prove are weaker than the best known results
by using more restrictive hypotheses.  In stronger results, the domain is
larger and may include graphs containing no configuration in the set forced by
the more restrictive hypothesis.  Thus the stronger results generally require
more detailed case analysis, with more configurations that must be proved
reducible.

Another motivation is that the Discharging Method often yields a fast inductive
algorithm to construct a witness for the desired conclusion, such as a good
coloring.  Iterative application of the discharging argument yields a sequence
of reductions to successively smaller graphs.  After a good coloring of the
base graph is produced, the original graph is built back up, and all the
intermediate graphs are given good colorings using the reducibility arguments.
The process tends to be fast because typically the next reducible configuration
can be guaranteed to be found in the neighborhood of an earlier one, so the
next reduction can be found in amortized constant time (see Section~6
of~\cite{CK}).

The overall idea of discharging proofs is simple, and the proofs are usually
easy to follow, though they may have many details.  The mystery arises in the
choice of reducible configurations, the rules for moving charge, and how to
find the best hypothesis for the structural lemma.  We aim to explain the
interplay among these and suggest how such proofs are discovered.  In keeping
with our instructional intent, we pose additional statements as exercises.

\bigskip
As suggested above, we begin in Section~\ref{secmad} by using discharging to
prove structure theorems about sparse graphs, motivated by applications to
coloring problems.  A bound on the average degree forces sparse local
configurations, but to use the structure theorem in an inductive proof we also
require the same bound in all subgraphs.  The {\it maximum average degree},
written ${\rm{mad}}(G)$, is ${\rm{mad}}(G)=\max_{H\subseteq G}\frac{2|E(H)|}{|V(H)|}$.

Section~\ref{seclist} expands the discussion to list coloring.  Reducibility
arguments may involve coloring vertices in a good order, which works as well
for list coloring as for ordinary coloring.  Section~\ref{seclistedge} applies
a similar approach to edge-coloring, where arbitrarily large structures may
appear in the structure theorems proved by discharging.  We study restrictions
on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ that yield strong bounds on edge-coloring.  Included is a recent
enhancement of discharging by Woodall~\cite{W2} in which charge is moved
iteratively instead of all at once.

Many results about coloring or structure of planar graphs (or planar graphs
with large girth) have been proved by discharging.  Euler's Formula implies
that (every subgraph of) a planar graph with girth at least $g$ has average
degree less than $\frac {2g}{g-2}$.  Many results proved for planar graphs
with girth at least $g$ in fact hold whenever ${\rm{mad}}(G)< \frac{2g}{g-2}$,
regardless of planarity, often with the same proof by discharging.
Others, such as those in Section~\ref{secplanar}, truly depend on the planarity
of the graph by using also the sparseness of the planar dual, assigning charge
to both the faces and the vertices.  In Sections~\ref{secplanar} and
\ref{seclight} we use discharging to prove (known) partial results toward
various open problems about planar graphs.

In Section~\ref{secrestrict}, we present discharging results on several
variations of coloring.  We consider colorings satisfying stronger requirements
(acyclic coloring, star coloring, and linear coloring) and weaker requirements
(``improper'' colorings).  In Section~\ref{secmisc}, we briefly mention other
problems in which discharging has been used.

\section{Structure and coloring of sparse graphs}\label{secmad}

We start at the very beginning, with very sparse graphs.  Graphs with low
average degree have a vertex with small degree, but we seek more structural
information.

Let ${\overline{d}}(G)$ denote the average degree of the vertices in $G$.  If
$0<{\overline{d}}(G)<2$, then some vertex has degree at most 1.  In fact, $G$ must have
at least two such vertices, but they may be far apart.  However, if
${\overline{d}}(G)<2-\epsilon$ with $\epsilon>0$, then $G$ must have an isolated vertex
or vertices of degree 1 within distance $\FR2\epsilon$ of each other.  More
precisely, $G$ must have a tree component with fewer than $\FR2\epsilon$
vertices, since an $n$-vertex tree has average degree $2-\FR2n$.

Similarly, if ${\overline{d}}(G)<k$, then only one vertex of degree less than $k$ is
guaranteed (subdivide an edge in a $k$-regular graph), but ${\overline{d}}(G)<k-\epsilon$
guarantees more.  Consider $k=3$.  If ${\overline{d}}(G)\ge 2$, then $G$ may have no
vertex of degree at most $1$.  However, if ${\overline{d}}(G)<2+\epsilon$ and
$\delta(G)\ge2$, then $G$ must have many ``consecutive'' vertices of degree
$2$.  We prove this structural result by discharging and then apply it to a
coloring problem.  We first introduce standard terminology that allows
discharging arguments to be expressed concisely.

\begin{definition}
For convenience, a \textit{$j$-vertex}, \textit{$j^+$-vertex}, or
\textit{$j^-$-vertex} is a vertex with degree equal to $j$, at least $j$, or at
most $j$, respectively.  Similarly, a \textit{$j$-neighbor} of $v$ is a
$j$-vertex that is a neighbor of $v$.
An \emph{$\ell$-thread} in a graph $G$ is a path of length $\ell+1$ in $G$
whose $\ell$ internal vertices have degree $2$ in the full graph $G$.
\end{definition}

Under this definition, an $\ell$-thread contains two $(\ell-1)$-threads when
$\ell\ge1$.  Also, a cycle of length at most $\ell+1$ contains no $\ell$-thread.
Write $d_G(v)$ (or simply $d(v)$) for the degree of a vertex $v$ in a graph $G$.
Let $\Delta(G)=\max_{v\in V(G)}d_G(v)$ and $\delta(G)=\min_{v\in V(G)}d_G(v)$.

\begin{prop} \label{firstavd}
If ${\overline{d}}(G)<2+\frac1{3t-2}$ and $G$ has no $2$-regular component, then $G$
contains a $1^-$-vertex or a $(2t-1)$-thread.
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
Let $\rho=\FR12\frac{1}{3t-2}$.  Give each vertex $v$ its degree $d(v)$ as
initial charge.  If neither configuration occurs in $G$, then we redistribute
charge to leave each vertex with charge at least $2+2\rho$.  If $G$ has no
$1^-$-vertex, then $\delta(G)\ge2$.  We then redistribute charge as follows.

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Each $2$-vertex takes $\rho$ from each end of the maximal thread
containing it.
\medskip

Each $2$-vertex receives charge $2\rho$ and ends with $2+2\rho$.  With
$(2t-1)$-threads forbidden, each $3^+$-vertex $v$ loses at most
$d(v)(2t-2)\rho$.  For a lower bound on its final charge, we find
$$
d(v)-d(v)(2t-2)\rho\ge 3\left[1-\frac{t-1}{3t-2}\right]
=2+\FR1{3t-2}=2+2\rho.
$$
We have proved that forbidding the specified configurations requires
${\overline{d}}(G)\ge 2+\FR1{3t-2}$.
\end{proof}

The idea is simple; if no desired configuration occurs, then charge can be
redistributed to contradict the hypothesis.  The details are also easily
checked.  The mystery is where the discharging rule and the hypothesis on
${\overline{d}}(G)$ come from.  The secret is that the discharging rule is found before
one even knows what the hypothesis on ${\overline{d}}(G)$ will be and is used to
discover that hypothesis.

\begin{remark}\label{threadrem}
For discharging proofs when ${\overline{d}}(G)<2+2\rho$, only $2$-vertices need to gain
charge (after restricting to $\delta(G)\ge2$), but we must ensure that
$3^+$-vertices don't lose too much.  The natural sources of charge for the
$2$-vertices are the nearest vertices of larger degree.

To select $\rho$, we seek the weakest hypothesis that avoids taking too much
charge from $3^+$-vertices.  With $\ell$-threads forbidden, each $3^+$-vertex
loses at most $(\ell-1)\rho$ along each incident thread.  For a $j$-vertex,
we thus need $j-j(\ell-1)\rho\ge 2+2\rho$, which simplifies to
$\rho\le \frac{j-2}{j(\ell-1)+2}$.  With $\ell$ fixed (and $j\ge3$), the bound
is tightest when $j=3$.  Therefore, setting $\rho=\FR1{3\ell-1}$ makes the
proof work and also gives the weakest hypothesis where it works.  We used
$\ell=2t-1$ in Proposition~\ref{firstavd} for consistency with the intended
application, but the statement and argument are valid for all $\ell$.

The structure theorem is sharp.  From the proof, all vertices in a sharpness
example should have degree $2$ or $3$.  To generate infinitely many such
examples, replace each edge of any $3$-regular $n$-vertex graph with an
$(\ell-1)$-thread.  Long threads do not occur, and there are $\ell\frac{3n}2$
edges and $n+(\ell-1)\frac{3n}2$ vertices; the average degree is
$2+\FR2{3\ell-1}$.
\end{remark}

Discovering a discharging argument is fun in itself, but the value is in
applications.  To use structural results in inductive proofs, we must require
the hypothesis of the structural lemma to hold also in subgraphs.

A graph is {\it $d$-degenerate} if every subgraph has a vertex of degree at
most $d$; this is an ``every subgraph'' analogue of $\delta(G)\le d$.
A \emph{$k$-coloring} of a graph $G$ labels vertices using a set of $k$ colors;
a coloring is \emph{proper} if adjacent vertices always have distinct colors.
A graph is \emph{$k$-colorable} if it has a proper $k$-coloring, and the
\emph{chromatic number} $\chi(G)$ is the least such $k$.  Every
$(k-1)$-degenerate graph is $k$-colorable, by induction on the number of
vertices.

Using bounds on average degree analogously to obtain good colorings requires
all subgraphs to satisfy the same bound.  Hence we restrict the maximum average
degree over all subgraphs, denoted by ${\rm{mad}}(G)$.  Note that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<k$ implies
that $G$ is $(k-1)$-degenerate.  Thus we already have $\chi(G)\le k$ when
${\rm{mad}}(G)<k$.  Even when ${\rm{mad}}(G)=k-1$, we cannot improve the bound on
$\chi(G)$, due to the complete graph $K_k$.  Hence to obtain stronger coloring
results when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<k$, we consider a more refined notion of chromatic
number.  Let ${\mathbb Z}_p$ denote the set of congruence classes of integers modulo
$p$; here $p$ is any positive integer.

\begin{definition}
A \emph{homomorphism} from a graph $G$ to a graph $H$ is a map
$\phi\colon\, V(G)\to V(H)$ such that $uv\in E(G)$ implies $\phi(u)\phi(v)\in E(H)$.
Such a map is an \emph{$H$-coloring}; the vertices of $G$ are ``colored'' by
vertices of $H$.  Let $K_{p:q}$ be the graph with vertex set ${\mathbb Z}_p$ in which
vertices are adjacent when they differ by at least $q$ (see
Figure~\ref{figcliq}).  A \emph{$(p,q)$-coloring} of $G$ is a homomorphism from
$G$ into $K_{p:q}$.  A graph having a $(p,q)$-coloring is
\emph{$(p,q)$-colorable}.  The \emph{circular chromatic number} of $G$, written
$\chi_c(G)$, is $\inf\{\frac pq\colon\, G\mbox{ is }(p,q)$-colorable$\}$.
\end{definition}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.130in
    \rlap{\kern 0.440in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.355in
    \rlap{\kern 0.749in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.719in
    \rlap{\kern 0.631in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.719in
    \rlap{\kern 0.248in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.355in
    \rlap{\kern 0.130in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 440 130}%
    \special{pa 631 719}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 631 719}%
    \special{pa 130 355}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 130 355}%
    \special{pa 749 355}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 749 355}%
    \special{pa 248 719}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 248 719}%
    \special{pa 440 130}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 0.440in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 0\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.263in
    \rlap{\kern 0.841in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.811in
    \rlap{\kern 0.723in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.811in
    \rlap{\kern 0.156in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.263in
    \rlap{\kern 0.038in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 4\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.130in
    \rlap{\kern 1.742in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.253in
    \rlap{\kern 1.996in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.528in
    \rlap{\kern 2.059in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.749in
    \rlap{\kern 1.884in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.749in
    \rlap{\kern 1.600in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.528in
    \rlap{\kern 1.425in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.253in
    \rlap{\kern 1.488in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1742 130}%
    \special{pa 1884 749}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1884 749}%
    \special{pa 1488 253}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1488 253}%
    \special{pa 2059 528}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2059 528}%
    \special{pa 1425 528}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1425 528}%
    \special{pa 1996 253}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1996 253}%
    \special{pa 1600 749}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1600 749}%
    \special{pa 1742 130}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 1.742in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 0\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.161in
    \rlap{\kern 2.088in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.528in
    \rlap{\kern 2.190in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.841in
    \rlap{\kern 1.976in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.841in
    \rlap{\kern 1.508in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 4\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.528in
    \rlap{\kern 1.294in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 5\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.161in
    \rlap{\kern 1.396in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.130in
    \rlap{\kern 3.044in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.226in
    \rlap{\kern 3.274in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.456in
    \rlap{\kern 3.370in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.686in
    \rlap{\kern 3.274in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.781in
    \rlap{\kern 3.044in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.686in
    \rlap{\kern 2.814in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.456in
    \rlap{\kern 2.719in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.226in
    \rlap{\kern 2.814in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 3044 130}%
    \special{pa 3274 686}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3274 686}%
    \special{pa 2719 456}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2719 456}%
    \special{pa 3274 226}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3274 226}%
    \special{pa 3044 781}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3044 781}%
    \special{pa 2814 226}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2814 226}%
    \special{pa 3370 456}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3370 456}%
    \special{pa 2814 686}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2814 686}%
    \special{pa 3044 130}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3044 130}%
    \special{pa 3044 781}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3274 226}%
    \special{pa 2814 686}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3370 456}%
    \special{pa 2719 456}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3274 686}%
    \special{pa 2814 226}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 3.044in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 0\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.134in
    \rlap{\kern 3.366in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.456in
    \rlap{\kern 3.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.778in
    \rlap{\kern 3.366in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.912in
    \rlap{\kern 3.044in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 4\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.778in
    \rlap{\kern 2.722in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 5\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.456in
    \rlap{\kern 2.588in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.134in
    \rlap{\kern 2.722in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 7\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.912in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 3.500in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-1pc}

\caption{$K_{5:2}$, $K_{7:3}$, and $K_{8:3}$\label{figcliq}}
\end{figure}

The term ``circular coloring'' suggests viewing the colors as equally-spaced
points on a circle.  A $(p,q)$-coloring $\phi$ then uses colors in
$\{0,\ldots,p-1\}$ so that $q\le\C{\phi(u)-\phi(v)}\le p-q$ when $uv\in E(G)$.
A $(k,1)$-coloring is just a proper $k$-coloring.  Zhu~\cite{Z1} surveyed basic
facts about circular coloring, which include that $\chi_c(G)$ is a well-defined
rational number (``$\inf$'' becomes ``$\min$'') and that
$\CL{\chi_c(G)}=\chi(G)$.  Thus $\chi_c(G)$ gives more information than $\chi(G)$.
Also, if $G$ has a $(p,q)$-coloring and $\frac{p'}{q'}\ge \frac pq$, then $G$ also
has a $(p',q')$-coloring.

Note that $K_{(2t+1):t}$ is isomorphic to $C_{2t+1}$.  Thus $\chi_c(G)\le2+\FR1t$
if and only if there is a homomorphism from $G$ into $C_{2t+1}$, which cannot
happen if $G$ has a shorter odd cycle.  Let $g_o(G)$ denote the length of a
shortest odd cycle in $G$, with $g_o(G)=\infty$ when $G$ is bipartite.
Requiring $g_o(G)\ge2t+1$ gives us a chance to prove $\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$.

\begin{prop}\label{firstcirc}
Fix $t\in{\mathbb N}$.  If $g_o(G)\ge 2t+1$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\frac{1}{3t-2}$, then
$\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$.
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
If $G=K_1$ or $G$ is a cycle, then $\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$.  With this as basis,
we use induction on $|V(G)|$ to obtain a homomorphism from $G$ into $C_{2t+1}$.
When $G$ is neither $K_1$ nor a cycle, Proposition~\ref{firstavd} implies that
$G$ has either a $1^-$-vertex or a $(2t-1)$-thread.  Note that $g_o(G')\ge 2t+1$
and ${\rm{mad}}(G')<2+\frac1{3t-2}$ whenever $G'$ is an induced subgraph of $G$.

If $G$ has a $1^-$-vertex $u$, then let $\phi$ be a homomorphism of $G-u$ into
$C_{2t+1}$, as guaranteed by the induction hypothesis.  To extend $\phi$ to $G$,
when $u$ is isolated we can give it any color.  When $u$ has a neighbor $v$, we
can assign $u$ either neighbor of $\phi(v)$ in $C_{2t+1}$.

Otherwise, $G$ contains a thread $P$ with endpoints $v$ and $w$ that has
internal vertices $\VEC u1{2t-1}$.  Let $G'=G-\{\VEC u1{2t-1}\}$.  Since
${\rm{mad}}(G')<2+\frac1{3t-2}$, the induction hypothesis yields a homomorphism
$\phi$ from $G'$ to $C_{2t+1}$.  To extend $\phi$ to the desired coloring
of $G$, map the internal vertices of $P$ to the internal vertices of a walk of
length $2t$ from $\phi(v)$ to $\phi(w)$ in $C_{2t+1}$.  This extension exists
because any two vertices of $C_{2t+1}$ are joined by a path of even length at
most $2t$.  To follow a path of length $2s$ in $2t$ steps, repeat one edge
$2t-2s+1$ times in succession.
\end{proof}

We need a $(2t-1)$-thread in the induction step because with shorter threads
there are choices for the colors at the endpoints that do not permit extension
along the thread.  For example, if the endpoints of a $(2t-2)$-thread have the
same color, then a $C_{2t+1}$-coloring cannot be extended along the thread.

Note again that the structural lemma uses only a bound on ${\overline{d}}(G)$.  Only
the application requires the bound also for all subgraphs.  In any hereditary
family ${\mathcal G}$, a bound on ${\overline{d}}(G)$ that holds for all $G\in{\mathcal G}$ immediately
yields the same bound on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$.

The structural result in Proposition~\ref{firstavd} is sharp, but
Proposition~\ref{firstcirc} is not.  We can improve it by considering more
configurations, with the same proof idea.  Let the {\it weak $2$-neighbors} of
a vertex $v$ be the $2$-vertices lying on threads incident to $v$.

\begin{lem}\label{avdnbhd}
If ${\overline{d}}(G)<2+\frac{1}{2t-1}$ and $G$ has no $2$-regular component, then $G$
contains (1) a $1^-$-vertex, or (2) a $3$-vertex with at least $4t-3$ weak
$2$-neighbors, or (3) a $4^+$-vertex incident to a $(2t-1)$-thread.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
Let $\rho=\FR12\frac{1}{2t-1}$.  Assign each vertex $v$ initial charge $d(v)$.
We may assume $\delta(G)\ge2$.  Redistribute charge using the same rule as
before.

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Each $2$-vertex takes $\rho$ from each end of the maximal thread
containing it.
\medskip

As in Proposition~\ref{firstavd}, each $2$-vertex finishes with $2+2\rho$.  If
no $3$-vertex has $4t-3$ weak $2$-neighbors, then each $3$-vertex $v$ loses
charge at most $(4t-4)\rho$ and hence retains at least $3-\frac{2t-2}{2t-1}$,
which equals $2+2\rho$.

Now let $v$ be a $4^+$-vertex.  If $v$ has no incident $(2t-1)$-thread, then
$v$ gives charge to at most $2t-2$ vertices on each incident thread.  The
minimum remaining charge $d(v)[1-(2t-2)\rho]$ is minimized when $d(v)=4$.
We compute $4[1-(2t-2)\rho]=4-2\frac{2t-2}{2t-1}=2+4\rho$.  (There is not enough
excess charge to force a longer thread; fortunately, this is just long enough!)

Every vertex finishes with charge at least $2+2\rho$, so avoiding the specified
configurations requires ${\rm{mad}}(G)\ge 2+\FR1{2t-1}$.
\end{proof}

This structural result is driven by the application, where a $3$-vertex with
$4t-3$ weak $2$-neighbors is reducible.  Balancing the needs of $2$-vertices
and $3$-vertices then governs the choice of $\rho$ to make the result apply to
the largest family.  When the reducible configurations at $1^-$-vertices and
$3$-vertices do not arise, some thread is long enough to be reducible.

Lemma~\ref{avdnbhd} yields a better coloring bound than
Proposition~\ref{firstcirc}, because we now have a more flexible way of
extending circular colorings of subgraphs.  We need a well-known lemma about
extension of circular colorings, illustrated in Figure~\ref{figext}

\begin{lemma}\label{circextend}
Assume $p>2q$, and let $P$ be an $\ell$-thread with endpoints $x$ and $y$ in a
graph $G$.  In a $(p,q)$-coloring $\phi$, a fixed choice of $\phi(x)$ can be
extended along $P$ with at most $\max\{0,p-1-(\ell+1)(p-2q)\}$ values in ${\mathbb Z}_p$
forbidden as $\phi(y)$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $u_0=x$ and $u_{\ell+1}=y$, so $P=\langle u_0,\VEC u1\ell,u_{\ell+1}\rangle$.  We
claim that the colors allowed at $u_i$ include $1+i(p-2q)$ consecutive colors
in ${\mathbb Z}_p$, true by definition for $i=0$.  If the colors from $a$ through $b$
(modulo $p$) are allowed at $u_i$, then the colors from $a+q$ through $b+(p-q)$
are allowed at $u_{i+1}$.  The size of the new interval exceeds the size of the
previous interval by $p-2q$.  When $\ell+1\ge \frac{p-1}{p-2q}$, there is no
restriction at $y$ from this thread.
\end{proof}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 0.165in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 0.576in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 0.988in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 1.400in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 1.812in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 2.224in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 2.635in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.494in
    \rlap{\kern 1.400in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.824in
    \rlap{\kern 1.400in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 1400 165}%
    \special{pa 165 165}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1400 165}%
    \special{pa 2635 165}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1400 165}%
    \special{pa 1400 824}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.329in
    \rlap{\kern 0.165in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $~$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 1.400in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $~$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.782in
    \rlap{\kern 0.412in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $(p,q)=(5,2)$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 2.800in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss {\large{0}}\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 0.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss {\large{1}}\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.824in
    \rlap{\kern 1.565in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss {\large{0}}\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.329in
    \rlap{\kern 2.224in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss {\small{2,3}}\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.329in
    \rlap{\kern 1.812in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss {\small{4,0,1}}\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 1.400in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss {\small{4}}\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.329in
    \rlap{\kern 0.576in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss {\small{3,4}}\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.329in
    \rlap{\kern 0.988in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss {\small{0,1,2}}\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.494in
    \rlap{\kern 1.565in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss {\small{2,3}}\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.988in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 2.800in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Extension of $(5,2)$-coloring along three threads; allowed colors
shown\label{figext}}
\end{figure}

We now adopt the language of ``minimal counterexample'' for inductive proofs.
Most applications of structure theorems proved by discharging are proved for
hereditary graph classes.  Proving reducibility of forced configurations then
completes an inductive proof, since it forbids the existence of a minimal
counterexample to the claim.

\begin{theorem}\label{madcirc}
If $g_o(G)\ge 2t+1$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\frac{1}{2t}$, then
$\chi_c(G)\le 2+\frac{1}{t}$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let $G$ be a minimal graph satisfying the hypotheses but not the conclusion;
the hypotheses hold for all subgraphs of $G$.  The claim holds for cycles, so
we may forbid $2$-regular components.  Lemma~\ref{avdnbhd} then guarantees one
of three configurations in $G$.  We already showed in Theorem~\ref{firstcirc}
that $1^-$-vertices and $(2t-1)$-threads are reducible for
$\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$.

It remains only to show that a minimal counterexample cannot contain a
$3$-vertex $v$ with at least $4t-3$ weak $2$-neighbors.  If $G$ is such a
graph, then form $G'$ from $G$ by deleting $v$ and all its weak $2$-neighbors.
Extending a $C_{2t+1}$-coloring of $G'$ along the threads incident to $v$
completes a $C_{2t+1}$-coloring of $G$ if some color in ${\mathbb Z}_{2t+1}$ is not
forbidden at $v$.

Let $l_i$ be the number of $2$-vertices along the $i$th thread at $v$.  By
Lemma~\ref{circextend} with $p=2t+1$ and $q=t$, this thread forbids at most
$(2t)-(l_i+1)1$ colors from use at $v$.  Together, the three threads forbid at
most $(6t)-(l_1+l_2+l_3+3)$ colors.  Since $\sum l_i\ge 4t-3$, at most $2t$
colors are forbidden, so some color remains available for a simultaneous
extension along the three threads to complete a $C_{2t+1}$-coloring of $G$.
\end{proof}

To see that Theorem~\ref{madcirc} improves Proposition~\ref{firstcirc},
note that the conclusion ($G$ is $(2+\FR1t)$-colorable) is the same in both,
but the hypothesis on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ is weaker in Theorem~\ref{madcirc}
(${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\FR1{2t}$) than in Proposition~\ref{firstcirc}
(${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\FR1{3t-2}$).  Weakening the hypothesis introduces graphs avoiding
the unavoidable set in Proposition~\ref{firstavd}, but then another
configuration is forced that is also reducible for the desired conclusion.

The bound on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ in Theorem~\ref{madcirc} is still not sharp for
$\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$.  In particular, Borodin et al.~\cite{BHIKW} proved for
triangle-free graphs that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{12}5$ implies $\chi_c(G)\le \FR52$, while
Theorem~\ref{madcirc} with $t=2$ requires ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR94$ to obtain
$\chi_c(G)\le \FR52$.  Sharpness of their result follows from the case $t=2$ of
the following construction.

\begin{example}\label{madsharp}
Let $G_t$ consist of two cycles of length $2t+1$ sharing a single edge, plus
a $(2t-2)$-thread joining the vertices opposite the shared edge on the two
cycles (see Figure~\ref{figccconj}).  Note that $G_1=K_4$, and
${\overline{d}}(G_2)=\frac{12}5$.  If $\chi_c(G_t)\le 2+\FR1t$, then $G_t$ must have a
homomorphism into $C_{2t+1}$.  However, once the colors are chosen on the edge
shared by the two $(2t+1)$-cycles in $G_t$, the colors on the remaining two
$3$-vertices are forced to be the same.  The homomorphism cannot be extended to
all of $G_t$, since there is no homomorphism from $C_{2t-1}$ into $C_{2t+1}$.
In fact, $\chi_c(G_t)=2+\frac1{t-1/2}$, so $\chi_c(G_2)=\FR83$.  In general,
${\overline{d}}(G_t)=2+\FR2{3t-1}$.
\end{example}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 0.042in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 0.381in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 0.719in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 1.058in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.550in
    \rlap{\kern 0.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.212in
    \rlap{\kern 0.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 42 381}%
    \special{pa 1058 381}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 550 550}%
    \special{pa 550 212}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.127in
    \rlap{\kern 0.296in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.635in
    \rlap{\kern 0.296in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.127in
    \rlap{\kern 0.804in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.635in
    \rlap{\kern 0.804in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 42 381}%
    \special{pa 296 127}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 296 127}%
    \special{pa 550 212}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 550 212}%
    \special{pa 804 127}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 804 127}%
    \special{pa 1058 381}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 42 381}%
    \special{pa 296 635}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 296 635}%
    \special{pa 550 550}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 550 550}%
    \special{pa 804 635}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 804 635}%
    \special{pa 1058 381}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 1.565in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 1.904in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 2.242in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 2.581in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 2.919in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.381in
    \rlap{\kern 3.258in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.550in
    \rlap{\kern 2.412in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.212in
    \rlap{\kern 2.412in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1565 381}%
    \special{pa 3258 381}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2412 550}%
    \special{pa 2412 212}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.127in
    \rlap{\kern 1.768in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.042in
    \rlap{\kern 2.107in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.635in
    \rlap{\kern 1.768in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.719in
    \rlap{\kern 2.107in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.127in
    \rlap{\kern 3.055in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.042in
    \rlap{\kern 2.716in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.635in
    \rlap{\kern 3.055in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.719in
    \rlap{\kern 2.716in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1565 381}%
    \special{pa 1768 127}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1768 127}%
    \special{pa 2107 42}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2107 42}%
    \special{pa 2412 212}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2412 212}%
    \special{pa 2716 42}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2716 42}%
    \special{pa 3055 127}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3055 127}%
    \special{pa 3258 381}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1565 381}%
    \special{pa 1768 635}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1768 635}%
    \special{pa 2107 719}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2107 719}%
    \special{pa 2412 550}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2412 550}%
    \special{pa 2716 719}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2716 719}%
    \special{pa 3055 635}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3055 635}%
    \special{pa 3258 381}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.762in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 3.300in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{The graphs $G_2$ and $G_3$ of Example~\ref{madsharp}\label{figccconj}}
\end{figure}

Example~\ref{madsharp} shows that the following conjecture is best possible.

\begin{conjecture}\label{ccconj}
If $g_o(G)\ge 2t+1$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\FR2{3t-1}$, then $\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$.
\end{conjecture}

The conjecture is trivial for $t=1$; \cite{BHIKW} proved it for $t=2$.  The
proof uses ``long-distance'' discharging, where charge can move along special
long paths.  A weaker version of Conjecture~\ref{ccconj} is a
special case of a result by Borodin et al.~\cite{BKKW}: if $G$ has girth at
least $6t-2$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\FR3{5t-2}$, then $\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$.
This uses larger configurations.

The result in~\cite{BKKW} is motivated by the dual of a conjecture of
Jaeger~\cite{Ja}.  Jaeger conjectured that every $4t$-edge-connected graph has
``circular flow number'' at most $2+\FR1t$.  When $G$ is planar, making this
statement for the dual graph $G^*$ yields $\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$ when $G$ has
girth at least $4t$.  Lov\'asz, Thomassen, Wu, and Zhang~\cite{LTWZ} proved the
weaker form of Jaeger's Conjecture replacing $4t$ by $6t$.  Thus
$\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$ when $G$ is planar with girth at least $6t$.
By Euler's Formula, ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{2g}{g-2}$ when $G$ is planar with girth $g$.
Thus ${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\frac{2}{2t-1}$ when $G$ is planar with girth at least $4t$.
Conjecture~\ref{ccconj} in some sense proposes a trade-off: by further
restricting to ${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\FR2{3t-1}$, the girth requirement can be relaxed to
$g_o(G)\ge 2t+1$ and still yield $\chi_c(G)\le 2+\FR1t$, even without requiring
planarity.

We have discussed only very sparse graphs and very small $\chi_c(G)$, but the
problem can be studied in general.  Always
$\chi(G)\ge\omega(G)$, where $\omega(G)$ is the maximum number of pairwise
adjacent vertices in $G$, called the {\it clique number} of $G$.
The {\it circular clique number}, written $\omega_c(G)$, is
$\max\{\frac pq\colon\, K_{p:q}\subseteq G\}$; note that $\chi_c(G)\ge \omega_c(G)$.

\begin{problem}\label{ccques}
Among graphs $G$ with $\omega_c(G)\le s$, what is the largest $\rho$ such that
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\rho$ implies $\chi_c(G)\le s$?
\end{problem}

The answer $\rho$ satisfies $\FL{s}\le \rho<s$.  The question generalizes the
statement that $(k-1)$-degenerate graphs are $k$-colorable but $K_{k+1}$ is
not.  If ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FL{s}$, then $G$ is $\FL{s}$-colorable and hence also
$s$-colorable.  If ${\rm{mad}}(G)=s$, then $G$ may be $K_{p:q}$ with $\frac pq=s$.
Problem~\ref{ccques} has not been studied much, but discharging should
permit some progress on it.

\medskip

{\small
\begin{exercise}\label{25min}
Let $G$ be a graph with $\delta(G)=2$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3$.  Prove that
$G$ has a $2$-vertex with a $5^-$-neighbor.  Prove that this is sharp in
the sense that the conclusion may fail when ${\rm{mad}}(G)=3$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{mindeg}
Given $0\le j<k$, let $G$ be a graph with $\delta(G)=k$.  Determine the largest
$\rho$ such that ${\overline{d}}(G)< k+\rho$ guarantees that $G$ has a $k$-vertex having
more than $j$ neighbors of degree $k$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{threadsharp}
Show that Lemma~\ref{avdnbhd} is sharp.  For each $t\in{\mathbb N}$ construct
infinitely many examples with average degree $2+\FR1{2t-1}$ in which none of
the specified configurations occurs.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{52CKY}
(Cranston--Kim--Yu~\cite{CKY1})
Let $G$ be a connected graph with at least four vertices.
Prove that if ${\overline{d}}(G)<\FR52$ and $\delta(G)\ge2$, then $G$ contains a
$2$-thread or a $3$-vertex having three $2$-neighbors, one of which has a
second $3$-neighbor.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{52struc}
(Cranston--Jahanbekam--West~\cite{CJW})
Prove that if ${\overline{d}}(G)<\FR52$ and $G$ is connected, then $G$ contains a
$3^-$-vertex with a $1$-neighbor, a $4^-$-vertex with two $2^-$-neighbors, or a
$5^+$-vertex $v$ with at least $\frac{d(v)-1}2$ $2^-$-neighbors.  (Comment: These
configurations are reducible for the ``${1,2}$-Conjecture'' of Przyby\l o and
Woz\'niak~\cite{PW}.  Although that proves the conjecture when
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR52$,~\cite{PW} proved the stronger result that the conjecture holds
for $3$-colorable graphs.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{madgen}
Prove that if ${\rm{mad}}(G)<k+\rho$ with $0<\rho\le \frac k{k+1}$, then $G$ contains
a $(k-1)^-$-vertex, two adjacent $k$-vertices, or a $(k+1)$-vertex with more
than $(\FR1\rho-1) k$ neighbors having degree $k$.  Construct sharpness
examples with ${\rm{mad}}(G)=k+\rho$ when $\rho=\FR12$ and when $\rho=\frac k{k+1}$
(the latter may have maximum degree $k+1$ or $k+2$).
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{ex:square}
Prove that if $\Delta(G)=k\ge 3$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<k-\frac2{k^2+1}$, then
$G$ contains one of the following configurations: (C1) a $(k-2)^-$-vertex,
(C2) two adjacent $(k-1)$-vertices, (C3) a $k$-vertex with two
$(k-1)$-neighbors, (C4) two adjacent $k$-vertices each having a
$(k-1)$-neighbor, or (C5) a $k$-vertex having three $k$-neighbors such that
each is adjacent to a $(k-1)$-vertex.
\end{exercise}

}

\section{List Coloring}\label{seclist}

Reducibility arguments for coloring often involve deleting some parts of a
graph and then choosing colors for the missing pieces as they are reinserted.
Suitable choices can be made if there are enough available colors; it does not
really matter what the colors are.  In this situation, the arguments often
extend to yield stronger results about coloring from lists.

\begin{definition}
A \emph{list assignment} on a graph $G$ is a map $L$ giving each $v\in V(G)$ a
set $L(v)$ of colors called its \emph{list}.  In a \emph{$k$-uniform} list
assignment, each list has size $k$.  Given a list assignment $L$ on $G$, an
\emph{$L$-coloring} of $G$ is a proper coloring $\phi$ of $G$ such that
$\phi(v)\in L(v)$ for all $v\in V(G)$.  A graph $G$ is \emph{$k$-choosable} if
$G$ is $L$-colorable whenever each list has size at least $k$ (we may assume
$L$ is $k$-uniform).  The \emph{list chromatic number} of $G$, written
$\chi_\ell(G)$, is the least $k$ such that $G$ is $k$-choosable.
\end{definition}

Since the lists could be identical, always $\chi_\ell(G)\ge \chi(G)$.  Thus proving
$\chi_\ell(G)\le b$ strengthens a result that $\chi(G)\le b$.  For example, Brooks'
Theorem states that $\chi(G)\le \Delta(G)$ when $G$ is a connected graph that
is not a complete graph or an odd cycle; Erd\H{o}s, Rubin, and
Taylor~\cite{ERT} proved the same bound for $\chi_\ell(G)$.  Although $\chi_\ell(G)$
may be larger for $2$-colorable graphs (Exercise~\ref{biplist}), cycles of even
length are well behaved; we will need this fact.

\begin{lemma}\label{evencyc}
Even cycles are $2$-choosable.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
We show that $C_{2t}$ is $L$-colorable when every list has size $2$.  If the
lists are identical, then choose the colors to alternate.  Otherwise, there are
adjacent vertices $x$ and $y$ such that $L(x)$ contains a color $c$ not in
$L(y)$.  Use $c$ on $x$, and then follow the path $C_{2t}-x$ from $x$ to $y$
to color the vertices other than $x$: at each new vertex, choose a color from
its list that was not chosen for the previous vertex.  Such a choice is always
available, and they satisfy every edge because the colors chosen on $x$ and $y$
differ.
\end{proof}

Coloring and list-coloring have been studied extensively for squares of graphs.
Given a graph $G$, let $G^2$ be the graph obtained from $G$ by adding edges to
join vertices that are distance $2$ apart in $G$.  The neighbors of a vertex $v$
in $G$ form a clique with $v$ in $G^2$, so always $\chi(G^2)\ge \Delta(G)+1$.
Kostochka and Woodall~\cite{KW} conjectured that always $\chi_\ell(G^2)=\chi(G^2)$.
This was proved in special cases, but Kim and Park~\cite{KP0} disproved it in
general.  They used orthogonal families of Latin squares to construct a graph
$G$ for prime $p$ such that $G^2$ is the complete $(2p-1)$-partite graph
$K_{p,\ldots,p}$; on such graphs, $\chi_\ell-\chi$ is unbounded.

Thus sufficient conditions for $\chi_\ell(G^2)=\Delta(G)+1$ hold only on special
classes but establish a strong property.  We present such a result to show how
a discharging proof is discovered.  The Discharging Method often begins with
configurations that are easy to show reducible.  A discharging proof of
unavoidability of a set of such configurations starts by forbidding them.
When discharging, we may encounter a situation that does not guarantee the
desired final charge on some vertices.  Instead of trying to adjust the
discharging rules, we may try to add this configuration to the unavoidable set,
allowing us to assume that it does not occur.  This approach succeeds if we can
show that the new configuration is reducible.

We use $N_G(v)$ for the neighborhood of a vertex $v$ in a graph $G$,
with $N_G[v]=N_G(v)\cup\{v\}$.

\begin{lemma}\label{sqred}
Fix $k\ge 4$.  If $\Delta(G)\le k$, and $G$ is a smallest graph such that
$\chi_\ell(G^2)>k+1$, then $G$ does not contain the following configurations:

\noindent
(A) a $1^-$-vertex,

\noindent
(B) a $2$-thread joining a $(k-1)^-$-vertex and a $(k-2)^-$-vertex,

\noindent
(C) a cycle of length divisible by $4$ composed of $3$-threads whose endpoints
have degree $k$.

\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $L$ be a $(k+1)$-uniform assignment on $G$; Figure~\ref{figsqred}
shows (B) and (C).

If (A) occurs at a $1^-$-vertex $v$, then let $G'=G-v$.  The $L'$-coloring
of $G'^2$ extends to an $L$-coloring of $G^2$, because at most $k$ colors
need to be avoided at $v$.

If (B) occurs, then $G$ has a path $\langle x,u,v,y\rangle$ such that $d(u)=d(v)=2$,
$d(x)\le k-1$, and $d(y)\le k-2$.  With distance $3$ between $x$ and $y$, we
have $(G-\{u,v\})^2=G^2-\{u,v\}$.  Let $G'=G-\{u,v\}$.  By minimality, $G'^2$
has an $L'$-coloring $\phi$, where $L'$ is the restriction of $L$ to $V(G')$.
In $G$, the color on $u$ must avoid the colors on $\{x,y\}\cup N_{G'}(x)$.
Since $d(x)\le k-1$ and $|L(u)|=k+1$, a color is available for $u$.  Now the
color on $v$ must avoid those on $\{x,y,u\}\cup N_{G'}(y)$.  Since
$d(y)\le k-2$ and $|L(u)|=k+1$, a color is available for $v$.

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.227in
    \rlap{\kern 1.773in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.227in
    \rlap{\kern 2.045in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.227in
    \rlap{\kern 2.318in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.227in
    \rlap{\kern 2.591in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.227in
    \rlap{\kern 2.864in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.955in
    \rlap{\kern 2.864in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.682in
    \rlap{\kern 2.864in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.409in
    \rlap{\kern 2.864in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.955in
    \rlap{\kern 1.773in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.682in
    \rlap{\kern 1.773in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.409in
    \rlap{\kern 1.773in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.136in
    \rlap{\kern 1.773in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.136in
    \rlap{\kern 2.045in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.136in
    \rlap{\kern 2.318in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.136in
    \rlap{\kern 2.591in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.136in
    \rlap{\kern 2.864in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 1773 1227}%
    \special{pa 2864 1227}%
    \special{pa 2864 136}%
    \special{pa 1773 136}%
    \special{pa 1773 1227}%
    \special{da 0.055}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 1773 1227}%
    \special{pa 1636 1227}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1773 1227}%
    \special{pa 1773 1364}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1773 1227}%
    \special{pa 1664 1336}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1773 136}%
    \special{pa 1636 136}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1773 136}%
    \special{pa 1773 0}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1773 136}%
    \special{pa 1664 27}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2864 1227}%
    \special{pa 3000 1227}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2864 1227}%
    \special{pa 2864 1364}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2864 1227}%
    \special{pa 2973 1336}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2864 136}%
    \special{pa 3000 136}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2864 136}%
    \special{pa 2864 0}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2864 136}%
    \special{pa 2973 27}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 2.591in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 2.782in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 2.045in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 1.855in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.682in
    \rlap{\kern 0.136in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.682in
    \rlap{\kern 0.409in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.682in
    \rlap{\kern 0.682in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.682in
    \rlap{\kern 0.955in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 136 682}%
    \special{pa 955 682}%
    \special{da 0.055}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 1064 573}%
    \special{pa 955 682}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 955 682}%
    \special{pa 1064 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 136 682}%
    \special{pa 0 682}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 136 682}%
    \special{pa 27 573}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 136 682}%
    \special{pa 27 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.573in
    \rlap{\kern 0.164in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.573in
    \rlap{\kern 0.409in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.573in
    \rlap{\kern 0.682in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.573in
    \rlap{\kern 0.927in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $y$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.064in
    \rlap{\kern 0.545in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss B\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.682in
    \rlap{\kern 2.318in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss C\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.364in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 3.000in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Reducible configurations in $G$ for $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le k+1$ (with $k=5$)
\label{figsqred}}
\end{figure}

If (C) occurs, then obtain $G'$ from $G$ by deleting the $2$-vertices on
the given cycle $C$.  Again $G'^2$ is the subgraph of $G^2$ induced by $V(G')$.
Let $v$ be a deleted vertex having a $k$-neighbor $z$ in $G$.  The color on
$v$ must avoid those on $z$ and all $k-2$ neighbors of $z$ in $G'$.  Since
$|L(v)|=k+1$, at least two colors are available for $v$.  These neighbors of
$k$-vertices on $C$ induce an even cycle in $G^2$.  By Lemma~\ref{evencyc}, we
can extend the coloring of $G'$ to these vertices.  Finally, the $2$-vertices
at the centers of the $3$-threads have only four neighbors in $G^2$, all of
which are now colored.  Since $k\ge4$, a color remains available at each such
vertex.
\end{proof}

In a discharging argument, we often say that a vertex is \emph{happy} when its
final charge satisfies the desired inequality.

\begin{theorem}[\cite{BLP2,CS}]\label{listsq}
If $\Delta(G)\le6$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)< \FR52$, then $\chi_\ell(G^2)=7$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let $G$ be a minimal counterexample. Let $k=6$.  By Lemma~\ref{sqred}(A),
we may assume $\delta(G)\ge 2$.  By Lemma~\ref{sqred}(B), $G$ has no $4$-thread
(or longer), and $3$-threads have $k$-vertices at both ends.  By
Lemma~\ref{sqred}(C), the union of the $3$-threads is an acyclic subgraph $H$.

Let each leaf of $H$ {\it sponsor} its incident $3$-thread, delete the edges of
the sponsored $3$-threads, and repeat.  When a component of what remains has
just one $3$-thread, pick one endpoint as the sponsor.  In this way, each
$3$-thread in $G$ receives one of its endpoints as a sponsoring $k$-vertex, and
each $k$-vertex is chosen at most once as a sponsor.

We now seek discharging rules to prove that if ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR52$ and
$\delta(G)\ge2$, then some configuration of type (B) or (C) in
Lemma~\ref{sqred} must occur.  This will not quite work; we will need to add
more configurations to the set, but they will be reducible.  A vertex is
{\it high} if its degree is $5$ or $6$; {\it medium} if it is $3$ or $4$.  Each
vertex $v$ has initial
charge $d(v)$; we seek final charge at least $\FR52$.  We treat the internal
vertices of a $j$-thread together; they need to receive at least $\frac j2$.
Here by ``$j$-thread'' we refer only to $j$-threads whose endpoints are
$3^+$-vertices.

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Each high vertex gives $\FR12$ to each neighbor.

\noindent
(R2) Each $3$-thread takes $\FR12$ from its sponsoring $6$-vertex.

\noindent
(R3) Each $2$-thread takes $\FR12$ from each medium vertex incident to it.

\noindent
(R4) Each $1$-thread takes $\FR14$ from each endpoint if they are both medium
vertices.

\begin{figure}[ht]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.828in
    \rlap{\kern 0.414in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.483in
    \rlap{\kern 0.414in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.721in
    \rlap{\kern 0.742in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.106in
    \rlap{\kern 0.617in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.106in
    \rlap{\kern 0.211in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.721in
    \rlap{\kern 0.086in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 414 828}%
    \special{pa 217 764}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 278 801}%
    \special{pa 217 764}%
    \special{pa 288 769}%
    \special{pa 278 801}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 217 764}%
    \special{pa 86 721}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 414 828}%
    \special{pa 292 995}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 347 949}%
    \special{pa 292 995}%
    \special{pa 319 929}%
    \special{pa 347 949}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 292 995}%
    \special{pa 211 1106}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 414 828}%
    \special{pa 536 995}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 509 929}%
    \special{pa 536 995}%
    \special{pa 481 949}%
    \special{pa 509 929}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 536 995}%
    \special{pa 617 1106}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 414 828}%
    \special{pa 414 621}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 397 690}%
    \special{pa 414 621}%
    \special{pa 431 690}%
    \special{pa 397 690}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 414 621}%
    \special{pa 414 483}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 414 828}%
    \special{pa 611 764}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 540 769}%
    \special{pa 611 764}%
    \special{pa 551 801}%
    \special{pa 540 769}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 611 764}%
    \special{pa 742 721}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.069in
    \rlap{\kern 0.414in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $5^+$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.655in
    \rlap{\kern 0.518in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR12$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.517in
    \rlap{\kern 1.793in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.172in
    \rlap{\kern 1.793in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.828in
    \rlap{\kern 1.793in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.483in
    \rlap{\kern 1.793in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.138in
    \rlap{\kern 1.793in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 1793 1517}%
    \special{pa 1793 138}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 1724 1172}%
    \special{pa 1724 483}%
    \special{da 0.069}%
    \special{ar 2025 509 438 438 2.328282 4.154241}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.517in
    \rlap{\kern 1.931in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $6$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.138in
    \rlap{\kern 1.931in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $6$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.483in
    \rlap{\kern 1.483in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR12$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1586 448}%
    \special{pa 1586 469}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1604 400}%
    \special{pa 1586 469}%
    \special{pa 1569 400}%
    \special{pa 1604 400}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1586 469}%
    \special{pa 1586 483}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.345in
    \rlap{\kern 2.828in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.000in
    \rlap{\kern 2.828in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.655in
    \rlap{\kern 2.828in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.310in
    \rlap{\kern 2.828in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2828 1345}%
    \special{pa 2828 310}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 2759 1000}%
    \special{pa 2759 655}%
    \special{da 0.069}%
    \special{ar 2901 583 283 283 2.099044 4.449244}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.345in
    \rlap{\kern 2.966in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $?$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.310in
    \rlap{\kern 3.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $3|4$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.552in
    \rlap{\kern 2.552in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR12$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2621 586}%
    \special{pa 2621 607}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2638 538}%
    \special{pa 2621 607}%
    \special{pa 2604 538}%
    \special{pa 2638 538}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2621 607}%
    \special{pa 2621 621}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.172in
    \rlap{\kern 3.862in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.828in
    \rlap{\kern 3.862in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.483in
    \rlap{\kern 3.862in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 3862 1172}%
    \special{pa 3862 965}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 3845 1034}%
    \special{pa 3862 965}%
    \special{pa 3879 1034}%
    \special{pa 3845 1034}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3862 965}%
    \special{pa 3862 828}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3862 483}%
    \special{pa 3862 690}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 3879 621}%
    \special{pa 3862 690}%
    \special{pa 3845 621}%
    \special{pa 3879 621}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3862 690}%
    \special{pa 3862 828}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.172in
    \rlap{\kern 4.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $4$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.483in
    \rlap{\kern 4.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $3$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.655in
    \rlap{\kern 3.724in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR14$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.000in
    \rlap{\kern 3.724in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR14$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.655in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 4.000in
  }%
}%
}
\vspace{-.6pc}

\caption{Discharging rules (R1)--(R4) for Theorem~\ref{listsq}\label{figsqdis}}
\end{figure}

High vertices can afford to give $\FR12$ to each neighbor, and $6$-vertices can
afford to give an extra $\FR12$ to one sponsored $3$-thread.  Group the
$2$-vertices by threads.  Since $3$-threads end at $6$-vertices, one being a
sponsor, each $3$-thread receives $\FR32$ and is happy.  Similarly, $2$-threads
are happy by (R1) and (R3), and $1$-threads are happy by (R1) and (R4) (see
Figure~\ref{figsqdis}).

It remains to consider medium vertices.  A $4$-vertex $v$ is unhappy only if it
loses more than $\FR32$; this requires that all its neighbors are
$2$-vertices and at least three of the incident threads are $2$-threads.
We show that this configuration is reducible.  Define $G'$ from $G$ by deleting
$v$ and its neighbors on three incident $2$-threads; note that $G'^2$ is the
subgraph of $G^2$ induced by $V(G')$.  Since $|N_{G^2}(v)\cap V(G')|=5$, we can
extend the $L'$-coloring of $G'^2$ to $v$.  When we restore the deleted
$2$-neighbors of $v$, the numbers of vertices whose colors they must avoid are
$4,5,6$, respectively, so at each step a color is available.

Since it gives at most $\FR12$ to each thread, an unhappy $3$-vertex $v$ has no
high neighbor and loses more than $\FR12$.  It may give charge at least
$\FR14$ to each of three threads or give $\FR12$ to one thread and at least
$\FR14$ to another.

In the first case, let $N_G(v)=\{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$, and let $G'=G-N_G[v]$.
The neighbor of $x_i$ other than $v$ has degree at most $4$.  As we restore
$N_G(v)$, the number of vertices whose colors they must avoid are $4,5,6$,
so at each step a color is available.  We can then replace $v$; it must avoid
the colors on six vertices.

In the second case, $v$ has two $2$-neighbors.  Let $z$ be the medium neighbor
of $v$, let $x$ be the neighbor on a thread receiving $\FR12$ from $v$ (it is a
$2$-thread), and let $y$ be the remaining neighbor ($y$ is a $2$-vertex whose
other neighbor is a $4^-$-vertex).  With $S=\{v,x,y\}$, let $G'=G-S$; again
$G'^2=G^2-S$.  Restore $v$, then $y$, then $x$.  As each is restored, its color
is chosen from its list to avoid the colors on at most six other vertices.
\end{proof}

Cranston and \v{S}krekovski~\cite{CS} proved more generally that if
$\Delta(G)\ge6$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\frac{4\Delta(G)-8}{5\Delta(G)+2}$, then
$\chi_\ell(G^2)=\Delta(G)+1$.  Thus when ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ is sufficiently small compared
to $\Delta(G)$, the trivial lower bounds on $\chi(G^2)$ and $\chi_\ell(G^2)$ are
tight.  With a similar but shorter proof, Bonamy, L\'ev\^eque, and
Pinlou~\cite{BLP2} proved the less precise statement that for each positive
$\epsilon$, there exists $k_\epsilon$ such that $\chi_\ell(G^2)=\Delta(G)+1$ for
$\Delta(G)\ge k_\epsilon$ when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{14}5-\epsilon$.

Even for planar graphs and ordinary coloring, ${\rm{mad}}(G)<4$ does not yield
$\chi(G)\le\Delta(G^2)+c$ for any constant $c$.  Note that girth $4$
implies ${\rm{mad}}(G)<4$ when $G$ is planar.  Consider the $3$-vertex multigraph in
which each pair has multiplicity $k$; this is called the {\it fat triangle}.
Subdividing each edge once yields a planar graph with girth $4$ and maximum
degree $2k$ whose square has chromatic number $3k$ (see Figure~\ref{figfat}).
Nevertheless,~\cite{BLP2} obtained a function $c$ such that if
${\rm{mad}}(G)<4-\epsilon$, then $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le\Delta(G)+c(\epsilon)$.

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.095in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.230in
    \rlap{\kern 1.405in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.230in
    \rlap{\kern 0.095in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.747in
    \rlap{\kern 0.930in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.691in
    \rlap{\kern 1.029in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.634in
    \rlap{\kern 1.127in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.577in
    \rlap{\kern 1.225in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 750 95}%
    \special{pa 930 747}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 930 747}%
    \special{pa 1405 1230}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1405 1230}%
    \special{pa 1029 691}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1029 691}%
    \special{pa 750 95}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 95}%
    \special{pa 1127 634}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1127 634}%
    \special{pa 1405 1230}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1405 1230}%
    \special{pa 1225 577}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1225 577}%
    \special{pa 750 95}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.060in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.173in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.287in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.400in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1405 1230}%
    \special{pa 750 1060}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 1060}%
    \special{pa 95 1230}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 95 1230}%
    \special{pa 750 1173}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 1173}%
    \special{pa 1405 1230}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1405 1230}%
    \special{pa 750 1287}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 1287}%
    \special{pa 95 1230}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 95 1230}%
    \special{pa 750 1400}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 1400}%
    \special{pa 1405 1230}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.747in
    \rlap{\kern 0.570in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.691in
    \rlap{\kern 0.471in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.634in
    \rlap{\kern 0.373in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.577in
    \rlap{\kern 0.275in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 95 1230}%
    \special{pa 570 747}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 570 747}%
    \special{pa 750 95}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 95}%
    \special{pa 471 691}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 471 691}%
    \special{pa 95 1230}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 95 1230}%
    \special{pa 373 634}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 373 634}%
    \special{pa 750 95}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 95}%
    \special{pa 275 577}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 275 577}%
    \special{pa 95 1230}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.495in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 1.500in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-1pc}

\caption{Construction with girth $4$ and $\chi(G^2)=3k$ (here $k=4$)
\label{figfat}}
\end{figure}

When $G$ is planar, larger girth restricts ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ more tightly.  Motivated
by the subdivided fat triangle, Wang and Lih~\cite{WL} conjectured that for
$g\ge 5$, there exists $k_g$ such that $\Delta(G)\ge k_g$ implies
$\chi(G^2)=\Delta(G)+1$ when $G$ is a planar graph with girth at least $g$.
The conjecture is false for $g\in\{5,6\}$; \cite{BGINT} and \cite{DKNS} both
contain infinite sequences of planar graphs with girth 6, growing maximum
degree, and $\chi(G^2)=\Delta(G)+2$.

However, the Wang--Lih Conjecture holds and can be strengthened to list
coloring when $g\ge7$.  Ivanova~\cite{I} proved $\chi_\ell(G^2)=\Delta(G)+1$ for
planar $G$ having girth at least $7$ and $\Delta(G)\ge16$ (improving on
$\Delta(G)\ge30$ from~\cite{BGINT}), and she also showed that the thresholds
$10,6,5$ on $\Delta(G)$ are sufficient when $G$ has girth at least $8,10,12$,
respectively.

For girth $6$, Dvo\v{r}\'ak, Kr\'al', Nejedl\'y, and
\v{S}krekovski~\cite{DKNS} proved $\chi(G^2)\le \Delta(G)+2$ for planar $G$
with $\Delta(G)\ge 8821$ (they also conjectured $\chi(G^2)\le\Delta(G)+2$
for girth $5$ when $\Delta(G)$ is large enough).  For girth $6$,
Borodin and Ivanova~\cite{BI1} improved $\Delta(G)\ge 8821$ to $\Delta(G)\ge18$;
they also showed that $\Delta(G)\ge 24$ yields
$\chi_\ell(G^2)\le \Delta(G)+2$~\cite{BI2}.

Bonamy, L\'ev\^eque, and Pinlou~\cite{BLP1} proved $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le \Delta(G)+2$
when $\Delta(G)\ge 17$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3$, regardless of planarity.  As we have
noted, ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{2g}{g-2}$ when $G$ is a planar graph with girth at least
$g$, so the result of~\cite{BLP1} is {\it stronger} than saying that
$\chi_\ell(G^2)\le \Delta(G)+2$ for all planar graphs with girth at least $6$ and
maximum degree at least $17$.

Now consider again the result of Cranston and \v{S}krekovski~\cite{CS}.
Reducing the bound on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ from $3$ to $2+\frac{4\Delta(G)-8}{5\Delta(G)+2}$
yields $\chi_\ell(G^2)=\Delta(G)+1$ rather than $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le\Delta(G)+2$, even
for the larger family where $\Delta(G)\ge6$.  Furthermore, as $\Delta(G)$
grows, the needed bound on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ tends to $\frac{14}5$, which is the bound
guaranteed for planar graphs with girth at least $7$.  Hence it seems plausible
that $\chi_\ell(G^2)=\Delta(G)+1$ for planar graphs with girth at least $7$ even
when $\Delta(G)\ge6$.  For fuller understanding of this parameter, we suggest
a problem.

\begin{problem}\label{G2prob}
Among the family of graphs such that $\Delta(G)\ge k$, what is the largest
value $b_{j,k}$ such that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<b_{j,k}$ implies $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le \Delta(G)+j$?
\end{problem}

Next we weaken the requirements.  A coloring where vertices at distance $2$
have distinct colors but adjacent vertices need not is an {\it injective
coloring} (the coloring is injective on each vertex neighborhood).  The
{\it injective chromatic number}, written $\chi^i(G)$, is the minimum number of
colors needed, and the {\it injective choice number}, $\chi_\ell^i(G)$, is the
least $k$ such that $G$ has an injective $L$-coloring when $L$ is any
$k$-uniform list assignment.

From the definition, always $\chi^i(G)\le \chi(G^2)$ and
$\chi_\ell^i(G)\le\chi_\ell(G^2)$.  The trivial lower bound on $\chi^i(G)$ is
$\Delta(G)$ rather than $\Delta(G)+1$.  We seek results like those above, with
a bound on $\chi^i(G)$ or $\chi_\ell^i(G)$ that is one less than the corresponding
bound for $\chi(G^2)$ or $\chi_\ell(G^2)$.  Again when ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ is small relative
to $\Delta(G)$, the value is close to the lower bound.  In~\cite{BLP1}, for
example, it is noted that the proof there also yields
$\chi_\ell^i(G)\le\Delta(G)+1$ when $\Delta(G)\ge 17$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3$.
Similarly, the proof in~\cite{CS} yields $\chi_\ell^i(G)=\Delta(G)$ under the
conditions there.

Nevertheless, the analogue of Problem~\ref{G2prob} for injective coloring
remains largely open.  When $j=0$, rather tight bounds on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ suffice.
Cranston, Kim, and Yu~\cite{CKY1} proved that $\chi^i(G)=\Delta(G)$ when
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{42}{19}$ and $\Delta(G)\ge3$.  Sharpness is not known, even
for $\Delta(G)=3$.  Subdividing one edge of $K_4$ yields a graph $H$ such that
$\chi'(H)>\Delta(H)$, and then subdividing every edge of $H$ yields a bipartite
graph $G$ such that $\chi^i(G)>\Delta(G)$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)=\FR73$.  The largest $b$
such that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<b$ implies $\chi^i(G)=\Delta(G)$ when $\Delta(G)=3$ is not
known; it is at least $\frac{42}{19}$ and at most $\FR73$.

To yield $\chi_\ell^i(G)\le\Delta(G)+1$, it suffices to have ${\rm{mad}}(G)\le\FR52$ when
$\Delta(G)\ge3$~\cite{CKY1}.  For $\Delta(G)\ge4$ this is fairly easy (it uses
Exercise~\ref{52CKY}); for $\Delta(G)\ge6$ it follows from~\cite{CS}.

To yield $\chi_\ell^i(G)\le\Delta(G)+2$, it suffices to have ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{36}{13}$
when $\Delta(G)=3$~\cite{CKY2}; we will see that this is sharp.  For
$\Delta(G)\ge4$, it suffices to have ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{14}5$~\cite{CKY2}; the cases
$\Delta(G)\in\{4,5\}$ are difficult, and sharpness is not known.  Note that
when $\Delta(G)\ge4$ the allowed values of ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ are larger than when
$\Delta(G)=3$; the loosest condition on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ that suffices for a given
bound on $\chi^i(G)-\Delta(G)$ should grow (somewhat) as $\Delta(G)$ grows.

We use one of these results to further explore how discharging arguments are
found.  In the discharging process, charge may travel distance $2$.

\begin{theorem}\label{36.13dis}
{\rm(\cite{CKY2})} If $\Delta(G)\le3$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{36}{13}$, then
$\chi_\ell^i(G)\le 5$.
\vspace{-.5pc}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
We present the discharging argument and leave the reducibility of the
configurations in the resulting unavoidable set to Exercise~\ref{36.13red}.  We
claim that every graph $G$ with $\Delta(G)=3$ and ${\overline{d}}(G)<\frac{36}{13}$
contains one of the following configurations: a $1^-$-vertex, adjacent
$2$-vertices, a $3$-vertex with two $2$-neighbors, or adjacent $3$-vertices
each having a $2$-neighbor.

If none of these configurations occurs, then $\delta(G)\ge2$.  With initial
charge equal to degree, only $2$-vertices need charge; all other vertices are
$3$-vertices.  A way to allow $2$-vertices to reach charge $\frac{36}{13}$
without taking too much from $3$-vertices is as follows:

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Every $2$-vertex takes $\FR3{13}$ from each neighbor.

\noindent
(R2) Every $2$-vertex takes $\FR1{13}$ via each path of length $2$ from a
$3$-vertex.
\medskip

Each $3$-vertex $v$ having a $2$-neighbor gives it $\FR3{13}$.  Since no two
$2$-vertices are adjacent, and adjacent $3$-vertices cannot both have
$2$-neighbors, $v$ loses no other charge.  Each $3$-vertex $w$ having no
$2$-neighbor loses at most $\FR1{13}$ along each incident edge, because its
$3$-neighbors do not have two $2$-neighbors.  (Under (R2), a $3$-vertex
opposite a $2$-vertex $x$ on a $4$-cycle gives $\FR2{13}$ to $x$.)  Thus every
$3$-vertex ends with charge at least $\frac{36}{13}$.

A $2$-vertex gains $\FR3{13}$ from each neighbor, and it also gains $\FR1{13}$
along each of the two other edges incident to each neighbor (see
Figure~\ref{fig3613}).  Hence it gains $\frac{10}{13}$ and reaches charge
$\frac{36}{13}$.  (With no adjacent $3$-vertices having $2$-neighbors, no
$2$-vertex lies on a triangle.)

We have shown that ${\overline{d}}(G)\ge\frac{36}{13}$ when the specified configurations
do not occur.
\end{proof}

\vspace{-.5pc}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.865in
    \rlap{\kern 1.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.865in
    \rlap{\kern 0.096in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.096in
    \rlap{\kern 0.096in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.481in
    \rlap{\kern 0.481in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.481in
    \rlap{\kern 0.865in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.096in
    \rlap{\kern 1.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.481in
    \rlap{\kern 1.635in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.481in
    \rlap{\kern 2.019in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.865in
    \rlap{\kern 2.404in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.096in
    \rlap{\kern 2.404in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 481 481}%
    \special{pa 96 865}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 481 481}%
    \special{pa 96 96}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 481 481}%
    \special{pa 865 481}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2019 481}%
    \special{pa 1635 481}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2019 481}%
    \special{pa 2404 865}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2019 481}%
    \special{pa 2404 96}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 96}%
    \special{pa 865 481}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 96}%
    \special{pa 1635 481}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 96}%
    \special{pa 1250 0}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2500 58}%
    \special{pa 2404 96}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2404 96}%
    \special{pa 2500 135}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2500 827}%
    \special{pa 2404 865}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2404 865}%
    \special{pa 2500 904}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 0 827}%
    \special{pa 96 865}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 96 865}%
    \special{pa 0 904}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 0 58}%
    \special{pa 96 96}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 96 96}%
    \special{pa 0 135}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 865 481}%
    \special{pa 1096 712}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1055 644}%
    \special{pa 1096 712}%
    \special{pa 1028 671}%
    \special{pa 1055 644}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1096 712}%
    \special{pa 1250 865}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1635 481}%
    \special{pa 1404 712}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1472 671}%
    \special{pa 1404 712}%
    \special{pa 1445 644}%
    \special{pa 1472 671}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1404 712}%
    \special{pa 1250 865}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 481 481}%
    \special{pa 1250 865}%
    \special{da 0.038}%
    \special{pa 788 635}%
    \special{pa 942 712}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 882 660}%
    \special{pa 942 712}%
    \special{pa 865 694}%
    \special{pa 882 660}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2019 481}%
    \special{pa 1250 865}%
    \special{da 0.038}%
    \special{pa 1712 635}%
    \special{pa 1558 712}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1635 694}%
    \special{pa 1558 712}%
    \special{pa 1618 660}%
    \special{pa 1635 694}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 0.612632 0.675132}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 0.483855 0.546355}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 0.355079 0.417579}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 0.226303 0.288803}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 0.097526 0.160026}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 -0.031250 0.031250}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 -0.160026 -0.097526}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 -0.288803 -0.226303}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 -0.417579 -0.355079}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 -0.546355 -0.483855}%
    \special{ar 770 481 615 615 -0.675132 -0.612632}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -2.528961 -2.466461}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -2.657737 -2.595237}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -2.786514 -2.724014}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -2.915290 -2.852790}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -3.044066 -2.981566}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -3.172843 -3.110343}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -3.301619 -3.239119}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -3.430395 -3.367895}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -3.559172 -3.496672}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -3.687948 -3.625448}%
    \special{ar 1730 481 615 615 -3.816724 -3.754224}%
    \special{pa 1115 462}%
    \special{pa 1115 485}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1135 408}%
    \special{pa 1115 485}%
    \special{pa 1096 408}%
    \special{pa 1135 408}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1115 485}%
    \special{pa 1115 500}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1385 462}%
    \special{pa 1385 485}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1404 408}%
    \special{pa 1385 485}%
    \special{pa 1365 408}%
    \special{pa 1404 408}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1385 485}%
    \special{pa 1385 500}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.913in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 2.500in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-1pc}

\caption{Discharging rules for Theorem~\ref{36.13dis}; dashes move $\FR1{13}$
\label{fig3613}}
\end{figure}

\begin{remark}
The proof of Theorem~\ref{36.13dis} allows every vertex to end with charge
exactly $\frac{36}{13}$.  This can happen, making the structure theorem sharp.
In fact, here also the coloring result is sharp.  Deleting one vertex from the
Heawood graph (the incidence graph of the Fano plane) yields a graph $H$ with
${\overline{d}}(H)=\frac{36}{13}$, $\Delta(H)=3$, and $\chi^i(G)=6$.

The discharging rules in Theorem~\ref{36.13dis} follow naturally from the bound
on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ and the forbidden configurations, but how are those found?  To
discover the structure theorem, first study the coloring problem to find
reducible configurations.  A $1^-$-vertex and two adjacent $2$-vertices are
easy to show reducible.  With a bit more thought, a $3$-vertex with two
$2$-neighbors is reducible.  These configurations form an unavoidable set for
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR83$, using the discharging rule that each $2$-vertex takes $\FR13$
from each neighbor.  That yields the desired conclusion when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR83$,
but we can do better.

After adding the reducible configuration consisting of two adjacent
$3$-vertices having $2$-neighbors, we seek the loosest bound on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ under
which this larger set is unavoidable.  It will exceed $\FR83$.  The
$2$-vertices can take charge only from $3$-vertices, but when ${\rm{mad}}(G)>\FR83$
their neighbors cannot afford to give enough to satisfy them.  When two
adjacent $3$-vertices with $2$-neighbors are forbidden, the $2$-vertices can
also gain charge along paths of length $2$.

Now we have the ``avenues'' of discharging.  Let each $2$-vertex take $a$
from each neighbor and $b$ along each path of length $2$.  Now $2$-vertices
end with $2+2a+4b$, $3$-vertices having $2$-neighbors end with $3-a$, and
$3$-vertices without $2$-neighbors end with as little as $3-3b$.  We seek $a$
and $b$ to maximize the minimum of $\{2+2a+4b,3-a,3-3b\}$.  If $3-a$ and $3-3b$
are not equal, then the value can be improved, so take $a=3b$.  Now
$\min\{2+10b,3-3b\}$ is maximized when $2+10b=3-3b$, or $b=\FR1{13}$.  Hence
the proof works when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{36}{13}$ and fails for any larger bound (as
also implied by the sharpness example.).
\end{remark}

\medskip

{\small

\begin{exercise}\label{biplist}
(Erd\H{o}s--Rubin--Taylor~\cite{ERT}, Vizing~\cite{V4})
Prove that the complete bipartite graph $K_{m,m}$ is not $k$-choosable when
$m\ge\binom{2k-1}k$.  Determine the values of $r$ such that $K_{k,r}$ is
$k$-choosable.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Cranston--Kim~\cite{CK})
Apply Exercise~\ref{ex:square} to prove that if $\Delta(G)\le 3$ and
${\rm{mad}}(G)\le \frac{14}5$, then $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le 7$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{dynamick}
(Kim--Park~\cite{KP})
Prove that if $\delta(G)\ge 2$ and ${\overline{d}}(G)< \frac{4k}{k+2}$ with $k\ge4$, then
$G$ has a $3^-$-vertex with a $(k-1)^-$-neighbor.  Guarantee a $2$-vertex with
a $(k-1)^-$-neighbor when $k\le6$.  Conclude that if ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{4k}{k+2}$ with
$k\ge4$ (and no components are $5$-cycles if $k=4$), then from any lists of
size at least $k$ a proper coloring of $G$ can be chosen so that every vertex
with degree at least $2$ has neighbors with distinct colors.  Show also that
this is sharp: there exists $G$ with ${\rm{mad}}(G)=\frac{4k}{k+2}$ and an assignment
of $k$-lists from which no such coloring can be chosen.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
In Problem~\ref{G2prob}, prove that $b_{1,k}\ge2$.  Show that equality holds
when $k\in\{2,3\}$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Cranston--Erman--\v{S}krekovski~\cite{CES})
Prove that a cycle of length divisible by $3$ with vertices whose degrees
cycle repeatedly through $2,2,3$ is reducible for $5$-choosability of $G^2$.
Use discharging to conclude that if $\Delta(G)\le4$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<16/7$.
then $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le 5$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Cranston--Erman--\v{S}krekovski~\cite{CES})
Prove that if $\Delta(G)\le 4$ and ${\overline{d}}(G)< \frac{18}7$, then $G$ contains one
of: (C1) a $1^-$-vertex, (C2) two adjacent $2$-vertices, (C3) a $3$-vertex with
three $2$-neighbors, or (C4) a four-vertex path alternating between
$2$-vertices and $3$-vertices.  Conclude that if $\Delta(G)\le 4$ and
${\rm{mad}}(G)< \frac{18}7$, then $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le 7$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Cranston--Erman--\v{S}krekovski~\cite{CES})
Prove that if $\Delta(G)\le 4$ and ${\overline{d}}(G)\le \frac{10}3$, then $G$ contains one
of: (C1) a $1^-$-vertex, (C2) a $2$-vertex with a $3^-$-neighbor, (C3) a
$3$-vertex with two $3$-neighbors, or (C4) a $4$-vertex with a $2$-neighbor and
a $3^-$-neighbor.  Construct infinitely many graphs with average degree
$\frac{10}3$ and maximum degree $4$ that contain no such configuration.  Prove
that if $\Delta(G)\le 4$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{10}3$, then $\chi_l(G^2)\le 12$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{36.13red}
(Cranston--Kim--Yu~\cite{CKY2})
Complete the proof of Theorem~\ref{36.13dis} by showing that those
configurations are reducible for $\chi^i(G)\le5$ in the family of graphs with
$\Delta(G)\le3$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Cranston--Kim--Yu~\cite{CKY2})
Prove that if ${\overline{d}}(G)<\frac{14}5$ and $\Delta(G)\ge6$, then $G$ contains one of
the following configurations: (C1) a $1^-$-vertex, (C2) adjacent $2$-vertices,
(C3) a $3$-vertex with neighbors of degrees $2,a,b$, where $a+b\le\Delta(G)+2$,
or (C4) a $4$-vertex having four $2$-neighbors, one of which has other neighbor
of degree less than $\Delta(G)$.  Argue that none of these configurations can
appear in a minimal graph $G$ such that $\Delta(G)\ge 6$ and
$\chi^i(G)>\Delta(G)+2$.  Reducibility of the first two configurations and
part of (C3) is already requested in Exercise~\ref{36.13red}.
\end{exercise}

}

\section{Edge-coloring and List Edge-coloring}\label{seclistedge}

A {\it proper edge-coloring} assigns colors to the edges of a graph $G$ so that
incident edges receive distinct colors.  The {\it edge-chromatic number},
written $\chi'(G)$, is the minimum number of colors in such a coloring.  Since the colors on edges with a common endpoint must be distinct, always
$\chi'(G)\ge\Delta(G)$.  Vizing~\cite{V0,V2} and Gupta~\cite{G} proved one
of the most famous theorems in graph coloring.  It gives an upper bound for
$\chi'(G)$ when $G$ is a multigraph (allowing multiedges) and specializes to
the following for graphs (no loops or multiedges).

\begin{theorem}[Vizing's Theorem]
If $G$ is a graph, then $\Delta(G)\leq \chi'(G)\leq\Delta(G)+1$.
\end{theorem}

Recognition of $\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$ is NP-complete, so we seek
sufficient conditions for equality.

\begin{conj}[Vizing's Planar Graph Conjecture~\cite{V1,V3}]\label{vizconj}
\label{planar-graph-conj}
If $G$ is a planar graph and $\Delta(G)\ge6$, then $\chi'(G) = \Delta(G)$.
\end{conj}

Both conditions in Vizing's Conjecture are needed.  The complete graph $K_7$ is
$6$-regular but not planar.  Each color can be used on at most three edges,
so $\chi'(K_7)\ge \frac{21}3=7$.  Similarly, obtain $G$ from a $5$-regular planar
graph with $2k$ vertices by subdividing one edge.  Since $G$ has $5k+1$ edges,
and at most $k$ edges can receive the same color, $\chi'(G)\ge6$.  This
difficulty does not arise for $\Delta(G)\ge6$, because regular planar graphs
have degree at most $5$.

Vizing~\cite{V1} proved Conjecture~\ref{vizconj} for $\Delta(G)\ge8$, using
Vizing's Adjacency Lemma (VAL).  It is common to say that $G$ is \emph{Class 1}
if $\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$, \emph{Class 2} otherwise.  An
{\it edge-critical graph} $G$ is then a Class 2 graph such that
$\chi'(G-e)=\Delta(G)$ for all $e\in E(G)$.  In fact, VAL implies that
every edge-critical graph has at least three vertices of maximum degree,
so $\Delta(G)=\Delta(G-e)$.  Note also that every Class 2 graph contains an
edge-critical graph with the same maximum degree.

\begin{theorem}[Vizing's Adjacency Lemma \cite{V1}]\label{VAL}
If $x$ and $y$ are adjacent in an edge-critical graph $G$, then at least
$\max\{1+\Delta(G)-d(y),2\}$ neighbors of $x$ have degree $\Delta(G)$.
\end{theorem}

Using VAL, Vizing proved the conjecture for $\Delta(G)\geq 8$ via counting
arguments about vertices of various degrees.  The proof is clearer in the
language of discharging, which was not then in use.  Luo and Zhang~\cite{LZ}
used VAL and discharging to prove $\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$ for the larger family of
graphs $G$ with ${\rm{mad}}(G)\le6$ and $\Delta(G)\ge8$.  We present a slightly
simpler proof of a slightly weaker result, requiring ${\rm{mad}}(G)<6$.  In fact,
Miao and Sun~\cite{LQ} proved $\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$ also when $\Delta(G)\ge8$
and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{13}2$.  Their result (and that of~\cite{LZ}) uses additional
adjacency lemmas.  Here VAL takes the place of reducibility arguments.

\begin{thm}[\cite{LZ}]\label{vizingplanar}
If $G$ is a graph with ${\rm{mad}}(G)<6$ and $\Delta(G)\ge 8$, then
$\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$.
\end{thm}

\begin{proof}
Let $G$ be a minimal counterexample, and let $k=\Delta(G)$.  Since $\chi'(G)>k$
requires an edge-critical subgraph with the same maximum degree, we may assume
that $G$ is edge-critical.  Since VAL gives each vertex at least two
$k$-neighbors, $\delta(G)\geq 2$.  We use discharging with initial charge
$d(v)$; it suffices to show that each vertex ends with charge at least $6$.

\medskip\noindent
(R1) If $d(v)\le 4$, then $v$ takes $\frac{6-d(v)}{d(v)}$ from each neighbor.

\noindent
(R2) If $d(v)\in\{5,6\}$, then $v$ takes $\FR14$ from each $6^+$-neighbor.
\medskip

For $v\in V(G)$, let $j$ be the least degree among vertices in $N_G(v)$.
If $j<k$, then $v$ has at least $k+1-j$ neighbors of degree $k$, by VAL.
Hence $k+1-j\le d(v)-1$, which yields $j\ge 10-d(v)$ since $k\ge8$.
Note that $7^+$-vertices take no charge.

If $d(v)\le 4$, then $j\ge6$, so $v$ loses no charge, and (R1) sends enough to
make $v$ happy.

If $d(v)=5$, then $j\ge5$.  Furthermore, $j=5$ yields $k-4$ neighbors with
degree $k$.  Since $k\ge8$, charge at least $4(\FR14)$ comes to $v$, no charge
is given away, and $v$ is happy.

The remaining cases are all similar but require individual checking.  We
show representative cases in Figure~\ref{figVAL}.

If $d(v)=6$, then $j\ge4$.  At most $j-3$ neighbors have degree less than $k$.
For $j\in\{4,5,6\}$, $v$ gives at most $\FR24,\FR24,\FR34$ and receives at
least $\FR54,\FR44,\FR64$, respectively, ending happy.

If $d(v)=7$, then $j\ge3$.  At most $j-2$ neighbors have degree less than $k$.
For $j\in\{3,4,5,6\}$, $v$ gives at most $\FR33,\FR44,\FR34,\FR44$,
respectively, and remains happy.

If $d(v)\ge8$, then $j\ge2$.  At most $j-1$ neighbors have degree less than $k$.
For $j\in\{2,3,4,5,6\}$, $v$ gives at most $\FR42,\FR63,\FR64,\FR44,\FR54$,
respectively, and remains happy.
\end{proof}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.093in
    \rlap{\kern 0.423in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.333in
    \rlap{\kern 0.754in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.722in
    \rlap{\kern 0.628in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.722in
    \rlap{\kern 0.219in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.333in
    \rlap{\kern 0.093in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 0.423in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 754 333}%
    \special{pa 556 397}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 651 391}%
    \special{pa 556 397}%
    \special{pa 637 347}%
    \special{pa 651 391}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 556 397}%
    \special{pa 423 440}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 628 722}%
    \special{pa 505 553}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 541 642}%
    \special{pa 505 553}%
    \special{pa 578 614}%
    \special{pa 541 642}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 505 553}%
    \special{pa 423 440}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 219 722}%
    \special{pa 342 553}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 268 614}%
    \special{pa 342 553}%
    \special{pa 306 642}%
    \special{pa 268 614}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 342 553}%
    \special{pa 423 440}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 93 333}%
    \special{pa 291 397}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 210 347}%
    \special{pa 291 397}%
    \special{pa 196 391}%
    \special{pa 210 347}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 291 397}%
    \special{pa 423 440}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 423 93}%
    \special{pa 423 440}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.719in
    \rlap{\kern 0.516in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR14$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.267in
    \rlap{\kern 0.574in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR14$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.267in
    \rlap{\kern 0.273in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR14$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 0.423in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 5\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.267in
    \rlap{\kern 0.820in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.787in
    \rlap{\kern 0.693in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.787in
    \rlap{\kern 0.153in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.267in
    \rlap{\kern 0.027in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.719in
    \rlap{\kern 0.331in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR14$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.093in
    \rlap{\kern 1.582in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.223in
    \rlap{\kern 1.854in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.518in
    \rlap{\kern 1.921in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.754in
    \rlap{\kern 1.734in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.754in
    \rlap{\kern 1.431in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.518in
    \rlap{\kern 1.243in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.223in
    \rlap{\kern 1.311in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 1.582in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1582 440}%
    \special{pa 1854 223}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1582 440}%
    \special{pa 1921 518}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1582 440}%
    \special{pa 1734 754}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1582 440}%
    \special{pa 1431 754}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1582 440}%
    \special{pa 1243 518}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1582 440}%
    \special{pa 1311 223}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 1582 440}%
    \special{pa 1582 232}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1559 325}%
    \special{pa 1582 232}%
    \special{pa 1606 325}%
    \special{pa 1559 325}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1582 232}%
    \special{pa 1582 93}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.158in
    \rlap{\kern 1.920in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.518in
    \rlap{\kern 2.014in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.819in
    \rlap{\kern 1.799in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.819in
    \rlap{\kern 1.366in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.518in
    \rlap{\kern 1.151in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.158in
    \rlap{\kern 1.245in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 1.582in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.209in
    \rlap{\kern 1.652in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.093in
    \rlap{\kern 2.741in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.223in
    \rlap{\kern 3.013in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.518in
    \rlap{\kern 3.081in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.754in
    \rlap{\kern 2.893in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.754in
    \rlap{\kern 2.590in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.518in
    \rlap{\kern 2.402in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.223in
    \rlap{\kern 2.470in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 2.741in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2741 440}%
    \special{pa 2741 93}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2741 440}%
    \special{pa 3081 518}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2741 440}%
    \special{pa 2893 754}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2741 440}%
    \special{pa 2590 754}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2741 440}%
    \special{pa 2402 518}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 2741 440}%
    \special{pa 2904 310}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2818 350}%
    \special{pa 2904 310}%
    \special{pa 2846 386}%
    \special{pa 2818 350}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2904 310}%
    \special{pa 3013 223}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2741 440}%
    \special{pa 2579 310}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2637 386}%
    \special{pa 2579 310}%
    \special{pa 2665 350}%
    \special{pa 2637 386}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2579 310}%
    \special{pa 2470 223}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 2.741in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.518in
    \rlap{\kern 3.173in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.819in
    \rlap{\kern 2.958in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.819in
    \rlap{\kern 2.525in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.518in
    \rlap{\kern 2.310in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.158in
    \rlap{\kern 2.404in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 4\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.158in
    \rlap{\kern 3.079in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 4\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.185in
    \rlap{\kern 2.904in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR12$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.185in
    \rlap{\kern 2.579in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR12$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.093in
    \rlap{\kern 3.901in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.195in
    \rlap{\kern 4.146in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 4.248in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.686in
    \rlap{\kern 4.146in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.788in
    \rlap{\kern 3.901in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.686in
    \rlap{\kern 3.655in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 3.553in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.195in
    \rlap{\kern 3.655in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 3.901in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 3901 440}%
    \special{pa 4146 195}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3901 440}%
    \special{pa 4248 440}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3901 440}%
    \special{pa 4146 686}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3901 440}%
    \special{pa 3901 788}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3901 440}%
    \special{pa 3655 686}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3901 440}%
    \special{pa 3553 440}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3901 440}%
    \special{pa 3655 195}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 3901 440}%
    \special{pa 3901 232}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 3877 325}%
    \special{pa 3901 232}%
    \special{pa 3924 325}%
    \special{pa 3877 325}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3901 232}%
    \special{pa 3901 93}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.129in
    \rlap{\kern 4.212in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 4.341in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.752in
    \rlap{\kern 4.212in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.927in
    \rlap{\kern 3.901in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.752in
    \rlap{\kern 3.589in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 3.460in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.129in
    \rlap{\kern 3.589in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 3.901in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.209in
    \rlap{\kern 3.970in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.093in
    \rlap{\kern 5.060in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.195in
    \rlap{\kern 5.305in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 5.407in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.686in
    \rlap{\kern 5.305in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.788in
    \rlap{\kern 5.060in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.686in
    \rlap{\kern 4.814in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 4.712in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.195in
    \rlap{\kern 4.814in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 5.060in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 5060 440}%
    \special{pa 5060 93}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5060 440}%
    \special{pa 5407 440}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5060 440}%
    \special{pa 5305 686}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5060 440}%
    \special{pa 5060 788}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5060 440}%
    \special{pa 4814 686}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5060 440}%
    \special{pa 4712 440}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 5060 440}%
    \special{pa 5207 293}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 5125 342}%
    \special{pa 5207 293}%
    \special{pa 5158 375}%
    \special{pa 5125 342}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5207 293}%
    \special{pa 5305 195}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5060 440}%
    \special{pa 4912 293}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 4961 375}%
    \special{pa 4912 293}%
    \special{pa 4994 342}%
    \special{pa 4961 375}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4912 293}%
    \special{pa 4814 195}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 5.060in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 5.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.752in
    \rlap{\kern 5.371in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.927in
    \rlap{\kern 5.060in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.752in
    \rlap{\kern 4.748in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.440in
    \rlap{\kern 4.619in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 8\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.129in
    \rlap{\kern 4.748in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.129in
    \rlap{\kern 5.371in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.209in
    \rlap{\kern 4.920in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.209in
    \rlap{\kern 5.199in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.927in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 5.500in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Some cases in Theorem~\ref{vizingplanar} ending with $0$ charge\label{figVAL}}
\end{figure}

Sanders and Zhao~\cite{SZ1} showed that Conjecture~\ref{planar-graph-conj} also
holds for planar graphs when $\Delta(G)=7$.  In~\cite{SZ3}, they proved
$\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$ for graphs with maximum degree at least $7$ that embed in
a surface of nonnegative Euler characteristic.  Since the proof above uses
only ${\rm{mad}}(G)<6$, it holds also for graphs in the projective plane.  Graphs
on the torus (or Klein bottle) also satisfy ${\rm{mad}}(G)<6$ unless they triangulate
the surface, in which case ${\overline{d}}(G)=6$.

Although Conjecture~\ref{planar-graph-conj} remains open when $\Delta(G)=6$, it
has been proved for various classes of planar graphs with certain subgraphs
forbidden, such as short cycles with chords (see~\cite{BW,WC1,WX}).  Note that
${\rm{mad}}(G)<6$ is not sufficient when $\Delta(G)=6$; planarity really is needed.
Although $K_7$ is forbidden by ${\rm{mad}}(G)<6$, consider the graph $G$ obtained
from $K_7$ by subdividing one edge with a new $2$-vertex $v$; we have
$\Delta(G)=6$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<6$.  In a proper edge-coloring of $G$, only two
colors can appear four times (using edges at $v$); hence six colors can cover
only $20$ edges, but $G$ has $22$ edges.

We next consider coloring both vertices and edges.

\begin{definition}
A {\it total coloring} of a graph $G$ is a coloring of $V(G)\cup E(G)$ such
that any two adjacent or incident elements have distinct colors.
The {\it total chromatic number} $\chi''(G)$ is the minimum number of edges in a
{\it total coloring} of $G$.
\end{definition}

\nobreak
In total coloring, the edges cause the most difficulty; already a proper
edge-coloring of a simple graph $G$ needs $\Delta(G)$ or $\Delta(G)+1$ colors.
Behzad~\cite{Beh} and Vizing independently conjectured an upper bound;
see~\cite[p. 261--262]{SSTF} for the history.

\begin{conjecture}[Total Coloring Conjecture]\label{totconj}
If $G$ is a simple graph, then $\chi''(G)\le\Delta(G)+2$.
\end{conjecture}

In Lemma~\ref{evencyc}, we showed that even cycles are $2$-choosable.  Since
cycles are isomorphic to their line graphs, we can also choose a proper
edge-coloring from lists of size $2$ on the edges.  This yields the Total
Coloring Conjecture for $4$-colorable Class 1 graphs.

\begin{theorem}\label{total}
If $\chi(G)\le4$ and $\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$, then $\chi''(G)\le\Delta(G)+2$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Color $V(G)$ properly using colors $1,2,3,4$.  Use colors
$3,\ldots,\Delta(G)+2$ to form a proper edge-coloring of $G$.  Uncolor all
edges having colors $3$ and $4$; we will recolor them.  We claim that on each
such edge, at least two colors among $\{1,2,3,4\}$ are available for use.  The
colored edges exclude no colors, because now none of them have any color in
$\{1,2,3,4\}$.  The only vertices that can exclude a color from use on an edge
are its endpoints.

Now lists of size $2$ are available on the edges.  The graph consisting of
edges that had colors $3$ or $4$ has maximum degree at most $2$, so it consists
of paths and even cycles, and a proper edge-coloring can be chosen from the
lists.
\end{proof}

Using Theorem~\ref{total}, the results on Vizing's Planar Graph Conjecture, and
the $4$-colorability of planar graphs (discussed briefly in
Section~\ref{secplanar}), the Total Coloring Conjecture has almost been proved
for planar graphs.  The cases with $\Delta(G)\le5$ were proved by ad hoc
arguments.  Since $\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$ when $G$ is planar with $\Delta(G)\ge7$,
Theorem~\ref{total} applies in that case.  Thus only the case $\Delta(G)=6$
remains unsettled for planar graphs.  The bound is sharp, since $\chi''(K_4)=5$.
However, Borodin~\cite{B89} proved $\chi''(G)=\Delta(G)+1$ when $G$ is a simple
planar graph with $\Delta(G)\ge14$, equaling the trivial lower bound (see
Exercise~\ref{totdelt}).

Proper edge-coloring of $G$ is equivalent to proper coloring of the line
graph $L(G)$.  Since the line graph has a clique of size $\Delta(G)$,
Vizing's Theorem states that the optimization problem of proper coloring
behaves much better when restricted to line graphs.
The same phenomenon seems to occur with the list version of the problem.

\begin{definition}
An \emph{edge-list assignment} $L$ assigns lists of available colors to the
edges of a graph $G$.  Given an edge-list assignment $L$, an
\emph{$L$-edge-coloring} of $G$ is a proper edge-coloring
$\phi$ such that $\phi(e)\in L(e)$ for all $e\in E(G)$.
A graph $G$ is \emph{$k$-edge-choosable} if $G$ is $L$-edge-colorable whenever
each list has size at least $k$.  The \emph{list edge-chromatic number} of $G$,
written $\chi_\ell'(G)$, is the least $k$ such that $G$ is $k$-edge-choosable.
\end{definition}

\begin{conjecture}[List Coloring Conjecture]\label{lcc}
$\chi_\ell'(G)=\chi'(G)$ for every graph $G$.
\looseness-1
\end{conjecture}

This conjecture was posed independently by many researchers.  It was first
published by Bollob\'as and Harris~\cite{BH}, but it was independently
formulated earlier by Albertson and Collins in 1981 and by Vizing as early as
1975 (both unpublished).  Vizing also posed the weaker conjecture that always
$\chi_\ell'(G)\le \Delta(G)+1$.  Kahn~\cite{Ka} proved the conjecture
asymptotically: $\chi_\ell'(G)\le (1+o(1))\chi'(G)$.

The List Coloring Conjecture was proved for bipartite multigraphs by
Galvin~\cite{Ga}, showing that $\chi_\ell'(G)=\Delta(G)$.  Vizing~\cite{V2,V3}
conjectured that $\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$ when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\Delta(G)-1$.  Based on
the List Coloring Conjecture, Woodall~\cite{W2} conjectured that
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\Delta(G)-1$ also implies $\chi_\ell'(G)=\Delta(G)$.
In this direction, it is known that $\chi_\ell'(G)=\Delta(G)$ when
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\sqrt{2\Delta(G)}$.  The result is implicit in~\cite{BKW}, using the
tool below.  Woodall~\cite{W2} reinterpreted the argument in the language of
discharging.

\begin{theorem}[Borodin--Kostochka--Woodall~\cite{BKW}]\label{BKW}
If $L$ is an edge-list assignment on a bipartite multigraph $G$ such that
$|L(uv)|\ge \max\{d_G(u),d_G(v)\}$ for all $uv\in E(G)$, then $G$ has an
$L$-edge-coloring.
\end{theorem}

Woodall~\cite{W2} introduced an exciting new technique of moving charge in
successive stages rather than all at once.  When the average degree is large,
vertices with very small degree need a lot of charge.  It may be too
complicated to specify exactly where it all comes from.  Hence he allows charge
to shift in phases, which we call ``iterated discharging''.

We start with the reducible configurations.  The {\it weight} of an edge in $G$
(or of any subgraph $H$) is the sum of the degrees (in $G$) of its vertices.
When the weight of a subgraph satisfies a desired bound, we say that the
subgraph is {\it light} in $G$.

\begin{proposition}\label{edgered}
Edges of weight at most $k+1$ are reducible for $k$-edge-choosability.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
A light edge $e$ is incident to at most $k-1$ edges.  If $G-e$ is
$k$-edge-choosable and $|L(e)|\ge k$, then an $L$-edge-coloring of $G-e$
extends to an $L$-edge-coloring of $G$.
\end{proof}

For the other reducible configuration, we need a definition.

\begin{definition}
In a multigraph $G$, an \emph{$i$-alternating subgraph} is a bipartite
submultigraph $F$ with partite sets $U$ and $W$ such that $d_F(u)=d_G(u)\le i$
when $u\in U$ and $d_G(w)-d_F(w)\le \Delta(G)-i$ when $w\in W$.
Note that cycles in $F$ alternate between $W$ and $i^-$-vertices in $U$.
\end{definition}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{ar 588 647 588 588 0 6.28319}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{ar 1618 647 882 588 0 6.28319}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{ar -243 647 588 588 -0.785398 0.785398}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 0.172in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.647in
    \rlap{\kern 0.172in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.397in
    \rlap{\kern 0.172in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.813in
    \rlap{\kern 1.004in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.481in
    \rlap{\kern 1.004in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.206in
    \rlap{\kern 1.618in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.088in
    \rlap{\kern 1.618in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.378in
    \rlap{\kern 2.095in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.916in
    \rlap{\kern 2.095in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 172 897}%
    \special{pa 1004 813}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1004 813}%
    \special{pa 172 647}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 172 647}%
    \special{pa 1004 481}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1004 481}%
    \special{pa 172 397}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1004 813}%
    \special{pa 1269 813}%
    \special{pa 1269 481}%
    \special{pa 1004 481}%
    \special{sp}%
    \special{pa 1004 813}%
    \special{pa 1618 1088}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1618 1088}%
    \special{pa 2095 916}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2095 916}%
    \special{pa 2095 378}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2095 378}%
    \special{pa 1618 206}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1618 206}%
    \special{pa 1004 481}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1618 206}%
    \special{pa 1618 1088}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1618 1088}%
    \special{pa 2095 378}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.235in
    \rlap{\kern 0.588in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.647in
    \rlap{\kern 1.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $G'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.765in
    \rlap{\kern 0.172in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.931in
    \rlap{\kern 1.004in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $w$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.534in
    \rlap{\kern 0.119in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $U$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.647in
    \rlap{\kern 1.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $W$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.235in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 2.500in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{A $2$-alternating subgraph $F$\label{figialt}}
\end{figure}

\begin{lemma}[\cite{BKW,W2}]\label{ialt}
$i$-alternating subgraphs are reducible for the property that
edge-choosability equals maximum degree.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $L$ be a $\Delta(G)$-uniform edge-list assignment for such a multigraph $G$.
Let $F$ be an $i$-alternating subgraph of $G$, and let $G'=G-E(F)$ (see
Figure~\ref{figialt}).  Choose an $L$-edge-coloring of $G'$, and delete the
chosen colors from the lists of their incident edges in $F$.  We claim that the
lists remain large enough to apply Theorem~\ref{BKW} to $F$.

For $uw\in E(F)$, no colors have been lost to edges incident at $u$, since all
edges incident to $u$ lie in $F$.  The number of colors lost to edges incident
to $w$, by definition, is at most $d_G(w)-d_F(w)$.  Since $d_G(w)\le\Delta(G)$,
the list on $uw$ retains at least $d_F(w)$ colors.  Also
$d_F(u)\le i\le \Delta(G)-(d_G(w)-d_F(w))$, so the list on $uw$ also retains
at least $d_F(u)$ colors.  Now Theorem~\ref{BKW} applies to complete the
$L$-edge-coloring of $G$.
\end{proof}

To avoid technicalities, we make the bound on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ slightly tighter
than needed.

\begin{theorem}[\cite{BKW,W2}]\label{woodall}
If ${\rm{mad}}(G)\le\sqrt{2\Delta(G)}-1$, then $\chi_\ell'(G)=\Delta(G)$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let $x=\sqrt{2\Delta(G)}-1$.  It suffices to show that every graph $G$ with
average degree at most $x$ contains a edge with weight at most $\Delta(G)+1$ or
an $i$-alternating subgraph with $i\le x$.  Suppose that $G$ contains neither.
An edge incident to a $1$-vertex would be light, so we may assume
$\delta(G)\ge2$.

Give each vertex initial charge equal to its degree.  In phase $i$ of
discharging, for $2\le i\le \FL{x}$, each $i^-$-vertex receives charge $1$ from
a neighbor.  We design these phases so that every vertex ends with charge at
least $\CL{x}$.

To begin phase $i$, let $U=\{v\colon\, d_G(v)\le i\}$, and let $W$ be the set of
all vertices having neighbors in $U$.  Note that $U$ is independent (no light
edge).  Let $F$ be the subgraph with vertex set $U\cup W$ containing all edges
incident to $U$.  Since $G$ has no $i$-alternating subgraph, there exists
$w\in W$ such that $d_F(w)\le d_G(w)+i-\Delta(G)-1\le i-1$.  Move
charge $1$ from this vertex $w$ to each of its neighbors in $U$.

Now delete $\{w\}\cup (N(w)\cap U)$ from $F$.  Each deleted vertex in $U$
has received charge $1$, and $w$ lost at most $i-1$.  Iterate.  What remains of
$U$ and $W$ at each step cannot form an $i$-alternating subgraph, so we
continue to find the desired vertex until $U$ is empty.

Since each vertex with degree at most $i$ receives a unit of charge in phase
$i$, vertices with degree less than $\sqrt{2\Delta(G)}$ have their charge
increased to at least $\sqrt{2\Delta(G)}$ (and they never lose charge).
Since there is no light edge, vertices with larger degree $j$ lose charge
only on rounds $i$ with $i\ge\Delta(G)+2-j$.  Hence such a vertex loses charge
at most $\sum_{i=\Delta(G)+2-j}^{\FL{x}}(i-1)$.  With each reduction of $1$ in
$j$, the amount of lost charge declines by more than $1$, so it suffices to
show that vertices with degree $\Delta(G)$ keep sufficient charge.
Their lost charge is bounded by $\FR12 x(x-1)$, so they keep charge at least
$\FR32\sqrt{2\Delta(G)}-1$, which is more than enough.
\end{proof}

Woodall also gave an example to show that the discharging argument is
essentially sharp, meaning that more reducible configurations will be needed
to weaken the hypothesis on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$.  By using VAL and further adjacency
lemmas to study the relationship between criticality for Class 1 and ${\rm{mad}}(G)$,
Sanders and Zhao~\cite{SZ2} proved that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR12\Delta(G)$ suffices to
make $G$ Class 1, and Woodall~\cite{W0} proved that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR23\Delta(G)$
suffices.  The list version seems to be much harder, and the more restrictive
requirement of ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\sqrt{2\Delta(G)}$ in Theorem~\ref{woodall} is a
first step.

\medskip

{\small

\begin{exercise}
Let $G$ be a graph with maximum degree at least $8$ that embeds on the torus.
By a closer examination of the proof of Theorem~\ref{vizingplanar}, prove
that $\chi'(G)=\Delta(G)$ except possibly when $G$ is obtained from a
$6$-regular triangulation $H$ of the torus by inserting vertices of degree $3$
into one-third of the faces in $H$, chosen so that each vertex in $H$ lies on
exactly two of the chosen faces, and making each new vertex adjacent to the
vertices of $H$ on its face.  It suffices to show that otherwise every vertex
ends with charge at least $6$ and some vertex ends with larger charge.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
Prove that if $\Delta(G)\le6$ and ${\overline{d}}(G)<\FR72$, then $G$ contains an isolated
vertex, an edge with weight at most $7$, or a cycle alternating between
$2$-vertices and $6$-vertices.  Conclude that if $\Delta(G)\le6$ and
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR72$, then $G$ is $6$-edge-choosable and $7$-total-choosable.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Borodin--Kostochka--Woodall~\cite{BKW})
Adapt the proofs of Lemma~\ref{ialt} and Theorem~\ref{woodall} to show that
if ${\rm{mad}}(G)\le\sqrt{2\Delta(G)}-1$, then $\chi''_\ell(G)=\Delta(G)+1$.
\end{exercise}

}

\section{Planar Graphs and Coloring}\label{secplanar}

The Discharging Method was developed in the study of planar graphs.  Although
many results on planar graphs (especially with girth restrictions) extend to
all graphs satisfying the resulting bound on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$, in this section we
return to the historical roots and emphasize results where planarity is needed.
Since planarity is very restrictive, for planar graphs one can sometimes prove
stronger results than hold for ${\rm{mad}}(G)<6$.  As examples, we first pursue the
problems discussed in Section~\ref{seclistedge} (other examples appear in the
exercises).

Borodin~\cite{ovb} confirmed the List Coloring Conjecture for planar graphs
with large maximum degree, proving that $\chi_\ell'(G)=\Delta(G)$ when
$\Delta(G)\ge14$.  This later was strengthened to $\Delta(G)\ge12$ by Borodin,
Kostochka, and Woodall~\cite{BKW}.  Borodin~\cite{ovb} also confirmed Vizing's
weaker conjecture in the broader class of planar graphs with $\Delta(G)\ge9$,
showing that then $\chi_\ell'(G)\le\Delta(G)+1$.  Bonamy~\cite{Bon} obtained this
conclusion also for $\Delta(G)=8$, by a much longer proof using 11 reducible
configurations.

The bound $\Delta(G)+1$ has also been proved for planar graphs with
$\Delta(G)\ge6$ having no two $3$-faces sharing an edge~\cite{C1}.  It was
proved in~\cite{JMS} for $\Delta(G)\le4$ (including nonplanar graphs), and when
$\Delta(G)=5$ it is known for planar graphs with no $3$-cycle~\cite{ZW}, no
$4$-cycle~\cite{C1}, or no $5$-cycle~\cite{WL}.  The proofs for $\Delta(G)=5$
all use discharging.

The distinctive feature of discharging for planar graphs is that charge can
also be assigned to faces, which are vertices in the dual graph.  The dual
graph $G^*$ is also planar, so ${\rm{mad}}(G^*)<6$ and we can use discharging on both
$G$ and $G^*$.  Using their interaction is more effective and leads to three
common (and natural) ways to assign charge on planar graphs.

\begin{proposition}
Let $V(G)$ and $F(G)$ be the sets of vertices and faces in a plane graph $G$,
and let $\ell(f)$ denote the length of a face $f$.  The following equalities
hold for $G$.
$$
\begin{array}{cll}
\SM v{V(G)}(d(v)-6)+\SM f{F(G)}(2\ell(f)-6)=-12&&{\rm vertex~charging}\\
\SM v{V(G)}(2d(v)-6)+\SM f{F(G)}(\ell(f)-6)=-12&&{\rm face~charging}\\
\SM v{V(G)}(d(v)-4)+\SM f{F(G)}(\ell(f)-4)=-8&&{\rm balanced~charging}
\end{array}
$$
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Euler's Formula for connected planar graphs is $n-m+p=2$, where $n$, $m$, and
$p$ count the vertices, edges, and faces (``points'' in the dual).  Multiply
Euler's Formula by $-6$ or $-4$ and split the term for edges to obtain the
three formulas below.
$$-6n+2m+4m-6p=-12;\quad -6n+4m+2m-6f=-12;\quad -4n+2m+2m-4f=-8.$$
Substitute $\FR12\SM v{V(G)}d(v)$ for the first occurrence of $m$ and
$\FR12\SM f{F(G)} \ell(f)$ for the second in each equation, and then
collect the contributions by vertices and by faces.
\end{proof}

Here the initial charges assigned to vertices or faces are not the degree or
length, but rather an adjustment of those quantities that uses the interaction
between vertices and faces.  Setting charge to degree is in some sense more
intuitive, but this adjustment facilitates using the dual graph also.  A vertex
or face now is ``happy'' when it reaches nonnegative charge.  When specified
configurations are assumed not to occur, making every vertex and face happy
provides a contradiction in the same way as when charges are not shifted.

For triangulations, such as in the Four Color Problem, vertex charging is
appropriate.  All the faces have charge $0$, and often they can be ignored.
For $3$-regular planar graphs, face charging is appropriate, with each vertex
given charge $0$.  With balanced charging when $G$ and its dual $G^*$ are
simple, $3$-vertices and $3$-faces are the only objects needing charge; those
with degree or length at least $5$ have spare charge to give away.

We begin with the recent use of balanced charging to prove the result of
Borodin~\cite{ovb} on Vizing's List Edge-Coloring Conjecture for planar graphs
with large degree.  Balanced charging is natural when neither the graphs nor
their duals are triangulations.  An interesting aspect of the proof is a
reservoir or ``pot'' of charge that can flow to or from vertices or faces
without regard to their location.  In this proof, the pot facilitates moving
charge from maximum-degree vertices to $3$-vertices; we need not name specific
recipients.

\begin{theorem}[\cite{ovb}]\label{listedge9}
If $G$ is a planar graph and $\Delta(G)\ge9$, then $\chi_\ell'(G)\le \Delta(G)+1$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
(Cohen and Havet~\cite{CH})
Let $G$ be a minimal counterexample, with an edge-list assignment $L$ such that
each list has size $\Delta(G)+1$ and $G$ has no $L$-edge-coloring.  An edge
with weight at most $\Delta(G)+2$ is reducible, by Proposition~\ref{edgered}.
Hence we may assume that $\delta(G)\ge3$ and that every neighbor of a
$j$-vertex has degree at least $\Delta(G)+3-j$.  Let $k=\Delta(G)$; since
$k\ge9$, the degree-sum of any two adjacent vertices is at least $12$.

We use balanced charging, with initial charge equal to degree or length minus
$4$.  Initially, the pot of charge is empty.  The discharging rules must make
each vertex and face happy and keep the charge in the pot nonnegative to
contradict the assumption of a counterexample.

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Every $3$-vertex takes $1$ from the pot, and every $k$-vertex gives
$\FR12$ to the pot.

\noindent
(R2) Each $3$-face takes $\FR12$ from each incident $8^+$-vertex and
$\frac{j-4}j$ from each incident $j$-vertex with $j\in\{5,6,7\}$.

\medskip
To ensure positive charge in the pot, we prove $n_k>2n_3$, where $n_j$ is the
number of $j$-vertices in $G$.  The edges incident to $3$-vertices form a
bipartite graph $H$; its partite sets are the $3$-vertices and the $k$-vertices.
If $H$ has a cycle $C$, then $C$ has even length, since $H$ is bipartite.  By
the minimality of the counterexample, $G-E(C)$ has an $L$-edge-coloring.  Each
edge of $C$ is incident to $\Delta(G)-1$ edges that have now been colored, so
there remain at least two available colors on each edge (see
Figure~\ref{figlist9}).  Since even cycles are $2$-edge-choosable (by
Lemma~\ref{evencyc} and cycles being isomorphic to their line graphs), the
$L$-edge-coloring extends to $G$.  Since $G$ is a counterexample, we thus may
assume that $H$ is acyclic and therefore has fewer than $n_3+n_k$ edges.  Since
it also has $3n_3$ edges, we have $3n_3<n_3+n_k$, as desired.

For vertices, (R1) immediately makes $3$-vertices happy.  A $j$-vertex $v$ with
$j\in\{4,5,6,7\}$ loses altogether at most $j-4$, its initial charge.
An $8$-vertex loses at most $4$, since $k\ge9$.  For $j\ge9$, possibly sending
$\FR12$ to the pot, a $j$-vertex loses at most $\frac{j+1}2$ and is happy.

For faces, the $4^+$-faces lose no charge and remain happy; we must show that
each $3$-face $f$ gains at least $1$.  Let $j$ be the least degree among
vertices incident to $f$.  If $j\le 4$, then two incident $8^+$-vertices give
$\FR12$ each.  If $j=5$, then two incident $7^+$-vertices give at least $\FR37$
each, plus $\FR15$ for the $5$-vertex.  If $j\ge6$, then each vertex incident
to $f$ gives at least $\FR13$ to $f$.
\end{proof}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.119in
    \rlap{\kern 0.208in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.119in
    \rlap{\kern 0.803in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.119in
    \rlap{\kern 1.397in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.119in
    \rlap{\kern 1.992in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 0 119}%
    \special{pa 2200 119}%
    \special{da 0.059}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 208 119}%
    \special{pa 208 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1397 119}%
    \special{pa 1397 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 0.208in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $3$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 0.803in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $k$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 1.397in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $3$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 1.992in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $k$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 803 119}%
    \special{pa 624 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 803 119}%
    \special{pa 684 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 803 119}%
    \special{pa 743 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 803 119}%
    \special{pa 803 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 803 119}%
    \special{pa 862 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 803 119}%
    \special{pa 922 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 803 119}%
    \special{pa 981 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1992 119}%
    \special{pa 1814 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1992 119}%
    \special{pa 1873 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1992 119}%
    \special{pa 1932 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1992 119}%
    \special{pa 1992 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1992 119}%
    \special{pa 2051 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1992 119}%
    \special{pa 2111 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1992 119}%
    \special{pa 2170 268}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.268in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 2.200in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Excluded cycles in Theorem~\ref{listedge9}\label{figlist9}}
\end{figure}
This proof fits the model of discharging to produce an unavoidable set of
reducible configurations.  The reducible configurations are light edges
(degree-sum at most $\Delta(G)+2$) and cycles alternating between $3$-vertices
and $\Delta(G)$-vertices.
Also, the role of the pot of charge is analogous to the use of $6$-vertices
sponsoring $3$-threads in Theorem~\ref{listsq}.  We used reducibility of
certain cycles in that proof to show that $H$ is acyclic, thereby guaranteeing
more $6$-vertices than $3$-threads.  A pot could then transfer extra charge
from $6$-vertices to $3$-threads; who sponsors whom is not important.
Conversely, in Theorem~\ref{listedge9} the forest $H$ can be dismantled to
obtain two $\Delta(G)$-neighbors as sponsors for each $3$-vertex.

\medskip
Now we consider planar graphs with larger maximum degree, large enough to
yield $\chi_\ell'(G)=\Delta(G)$.  As mentioned earlier, the best result known is
that $\Delta(G)\ge12$ is sufficient (Borodin, Kostochka, and
Woodall~\cite{BKW}).  We present a short proof of the earlier weaker result of
Borodin~\cite{ovb} that $\Delta(G)\ge14$ is sufficient.  The result
in~\cite{BKW} uses similar discharging, but it requires more reducible
configurations and more detailed analysis.

A {\it $t$-alternating} cycle alternates between $t$-vertices and vertices of
higher degree.  This suggested the term ``$i$-alternating subgraph'' in
Section~\ref{seclistedge}, which is almost a generalization.

\begin{lem}[\cite{ovb}]\label{altcyc}
If $G$ is a simple plane graph with $\delta(G)\ge 2$,
then $G$ contains \\
(C1) an edge $uv$ with $d(u)+d(v)\leq 15$, or\\
(C2) a $2$-alternating cycle $C$.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
In a counterexample $G$, we have $d(u)+d(v)\ge 16$ for every edge $uv$.
Both neighbors of any $2$-vertex are $14^+$-vertices.  Since $G$ is simple,
every $2$-vertex lies on a $4^+$-face.

To obtain a contradiction, we use face charging, with initial charge $2d(v)-6$
at each vertex $v$ and $\ell(f)-6$ at each face $f$.  We also keep a central
pot of charge (initially empty) and use the following discharging rules
(see Figure~\ref{fig2alt}).

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Each $14^+$-vertex gives charge $1$ to the pot, and each
$2$-vertex takes $1$ from the pot.

\noindent
(R2) Each $4^+$-vertex distributes its charge remaining after (R1) equally to
its incident faces.

\noindent
(R3) Each $4^+$-face gives charge 1 to each incident $2$-vertex.

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{ar 427 896 427 640 0 6.28319}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{ar 2133 1109 1067 256 0 6.28319}%
    \special{ar 2133 256 1067 256 0 6.28319}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.109in
    \rlap{\kern 1.280in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.256in
    \rlap{\kern 1.707in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.109in
    \rlap{\kern 2.347in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.256in
    \rlap{\kern 2.987in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.493in
    \rlap{\kern 1.963in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2987 256}%
    \special{pa 2347 1109}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2347 1109}%
    \special{pa 1963 1493}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1963 1493}%
    \special{pa 1280 1109}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1280 1109}%
    \special{pa 1707 256}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1707 256}%
    \special{pa 2347 1109}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 1280 1109}%
    \special{pa 1579 683}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1399 939}%
    \special{pa 1459 853}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1380 923}%
    \special{pa 1459 853}%
    \special{pa 1421 952}%
    \special{pa 1380 923}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1707 683}%
    \special{pa 1707 256}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1707 512}%
    \special{pa 1707 427}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1681 529}%
    \special{pa 1707 427}%
    \special{pa 1732 529}%
    \special{pa 1681 529}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2389 640}%
    \special{pa 2987 256}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 2628 486}%
    \special{pa 2748 410}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2648 443}%
    \special{pa 2748 410}%
    \special{pa 2675 487}%
    \special{pa 2648 443}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2347 1109}%
    \special{pa 2347 683}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 2347 939}%
    \special{pa 2347 853}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2321 956}%
    \special{pa 2347 853}%
    \special{pa 2372 956}%
    \special{pa 2321 956}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1280 1109}%
    \special{pa 1451 1451}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1348 1246}%
    \special{pa 1382 1314}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1360 1211}%
    \special{pa 1382 1314}%
    \special{pa 1314 1234}%
    \special{pa 1360 1211}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2347 1109}%
    \special{pa 1920 683}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 2176 939}%
    \special{pa 2091 853}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2145 944}%
    \special{pa 2091 853}%
    \special{pa 2181 908}%
    \special{pa 2145 944}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2304 640}%
    \special{pa 1707 256}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 2065 486}%
    \special{pa 1946 410}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2018 487}%
    \special{pa 1946 410}%
    \special{pa 2046 443}%
    \special{pa 2018 487}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1963 1493}%
    \special{pa 2389 1493}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 2133 1493}%
    \special{pa 2219 1493}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2116 1468}%
    \special{pa 2219 1493}%
    \special{pa 2116 1519}%
    \special{pa 2116 1468}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1963 1493}%
    \special{pa 1963 1835}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1963 1630}%
    \special{pa 1963 1698}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1988 1596}%
    \special{pa 1963 1698}%
    \special{pa 1937 1596}%
    \special{pa 1988 1596}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1963 1493}%
    \special{pa 1835 683}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1911 1169}%
    \special{pa 1886 1007}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1877 1112}%
    \special{pa 1886 1007}%
    \special{pa 1927 1104}%
    \special{pa 1877 1112}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1963 1493}%
    \special{pa 1536 1493}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1792 1493}%
    \special{pa 1707 1493}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1809 1519}%
    \special{pa 1707 1493}%
    \special{pa 1809 1468}%
    \special{pa 1809 1519}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2176 1664}%
    \special{pa 1963 1493}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1963 1493}%
    \special{pa 1749 1664}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.896in
    \rlap{\kern 0.427in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss pot\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.109in
    \rlap{\kern 2.816in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $W$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.213in
    \rlap{\kern 2.304in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $U$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 600 443}%
    \special{pa 1707 256}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1043 368}%
    \special{pa 1264 331}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1159 323}%
    \special{pa 1264 331}%
    \special{pa 1167 373}%
    \special{pa 1159 323}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 728 529}%
    \special{pa 2987 256}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1632 420}%
    \special{pa 2083 365}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1979 352}%
    \special{pa 2083 365}%
    \special{pa 1985 403}%
    \special{pa 1979 352}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1280 1109}%
    \special{pa 728 1221}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1059 1154}%
    \special{pa 949 1176}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1054 1181}%
    \special{pa 949 1176}%
    \special{pa 1044 1131}%
    \special{pa 1054 1181}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2347 1109}%
    \special{pa 427 1408}%
    \special{da 0.085}%
    \special{pa 1579 1229}%
    \special{pa 1195 1289}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1300 1298}%
    \special{pa 1195 1289}%
    \special{pa 1292 1247}%
    \special{pa 1300 1298}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.213in
    \rlap{\kern 1.877in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.213in
    \rlap{\kern 2.816in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.109in
    \rlap{\kern 1.536in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $14^+$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.230in
    \rlap{\kern 2.510in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $14^+$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.315in
    \rlap{\kern 0.814in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.614in
    \rlap{\kern 0.942in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.477in
    \rlap{\kern 0.814in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.093in
    \rlap{\kern 0.899in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.640in
    \rlap{\kern 1.749in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.683in
    \rlap{\kern 2.176in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.683in
    \rlap{\kern 2.517in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.835in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 3.200in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Discharging for Lemma~\ref{altcyc}\label{fig2alt}}
\end{figure}

\medskip
To keep the charge in the pot nonnegative, we need $|U|\le|W|$, where $U$ and
$W$ denote the sets of $2$-vertices and $14^+$-vertices, respectively.
Let $H$ be the subgraph of $G$ with vertex set $U\cup W$ and edge set
consisting of all edges with endpoints in both $U$ and $W$.  Since (C2) does
not occur in $G$, the components of $H$ are trees.  Also (C1) does not occur,
so $2|U|=|E(H)|<|U|+|W|$.  Thus $|U|<|W|$.

A $2$-vertex takes $1$ from the pot and $1$ from an incident $4^+$-face (since
$G$ is simple) and ends happy.  A $3$-vertex starts and ends with no charge.
By (R2), a $4^+$-vertex also ends with charge $0$.  Hence all vertices are
happy.

\nobreak
Faces give charge to $2$-vertices and take charge from $4^+$-vertices.  Under
(R2), a face takes charge $\frac{2j-6}j$ or $\frac{2j-7}j$ from an incident
$j$-vertex when $j\ge4$, the latter when $j\ge14$.  Thus the value is at least
$\FR12$ when $j\ge4$, at least $1$ when $j\ge6$, and at least $\FR32$ when
$j\ge12$.

If a face $f$ has no incident $3^-$-vertices, then it receives at least
$\FR12\ell(f)$; its final charge is at least $\FR32\ell(f)-6$, which is
nonnegative when $\ell(f)\ge4$.  When $f$ is a $3$-face or a face incident to
some $3^-$-vertex, let $k$ be the least degree among the vertices incident to
$f$.  Prohibiting (C1) gives $f$ two incident $(16-k)^+$-vertices.

A $3$-face needs to receive charge at least $3$.  When $k\ge6$, it receives at
least $1$ from each incident vertex.  When $k=2$, the other incident vertices
have degree at least $14$, and each provides $\FR32$.  When $3\le k\le 5$, it
receives at least $\frac{2k-6}k+2\cdot\frac{26-2k}{16-k}$, which is at least $3$.

A $4^+$-face $f$ needs $2$ (or maybe less) to become happy.  If $k\ge 3$ or
$f$ has exactly one incident $2$-vertex, then $f$ receives at least $3$ and
gives away at most $1$.  If $f$ has at least two incident $2$-vertices, then
each is followed on $f$ (in a consistent direction) by a $14^+$-vertex, which
contributes at least $\FR32$.  These pairs net at least $\FR12$ each for $f$.
If $G$ has no $2$-alternating cycle, then $f$ has another incident
$14^+$-vertex that has not been counted, which provides more than enough charge
to $f$.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}[\cite{ovb}]\label{list14}
If $G$ is a plane graph with $\Delta(G)\ge 14$, then $\chi'_\ell(G)=\Delta(G)$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let $G$ be a minimal counterexample, having no $L$-edge-coloring from edge-list
assignment $L$.  If $G$ has a $1$-vertex with incident edge $e$, then $G-e$ has
an $L$-edge-coloring, and it extends to $e$.  Thus $\delta(G)\ge 2$.  By
Lemma~\ref{altcyc}, $G$ has an edge $uv$ with $d(u)+d(v)\le 15$ or a
$2$-alternating cycle $C$.  In the first case, we can extend an
$L$-edge-coloring of $G-uv$, since $|L(uv)|\ge14$ and at most $13$ colors are
restricted from use on $uv$.  In the other case, by minimality $G-E(C)$ has an
$L$-edge-coloring.  Since each list has size at least $\Delta(G)$, each edge of
$C$ has at least two colors remaining available, and the $2$-choosability of
even cycles allows us to extend the edge-coloring.
\end{proof}

\bigskip
We close this section with a new proof of a classical result that appeared in
the survey~\cite{Bsurv} with the traditional proof.  Steinberg~\cite{St}
conjectured that every planar graph without $4$-cycles or $5$-cycles is
$3$-colorable.  Results on this family can be compared with the family
where ${\rm{mad}}(G)<4$; see Exercise~\ref{no45}.

Many papers have used discharging to prove $3$-colorability under various
excluded-cycle conditions.  For example, Borodin et al.~\cite{BGRS} proved that
excluding cycles of lengths $4$ through $7$ suffices.  Earlier,
Borodin~\cite{B1996} and Sanders and Zhao~\cite{SZ0} proved that excluding
$4$-cycles and faces of lengths $5$ through $9$ is sufficient.  The traditional
proof uses balanced charging, but face charging yields a somewhat simpler proof.

\begin{lemma}[\cite{B1996}]\label{10facelem}
Every plane graph $G$ with $\delta(G)\ge3$ has two 3-faces with a common edge,
or a $j$-face with $4\le j\le 9$, or a $10$-face whose vertices all have degree
$3$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $G$ be a plane graph with $\delta(G)\ge3$ having none of the listed
configurations.  Use face charging: assign charge $2d(v)-6$ to each vertex $v$
and charge $\ell(f)-6$ to each face $f$.  The total charge is $-12$.

Since no faces have lengths $4$ through $9$, the only objects with initial
negative charge are triangles; they begin with charge $-3$.  Each triangle
takes $1$ from each neighboring face.  To repair faces that may lose too much,
each face $f$ takes 1 from each incident $4^+$-vertex lying on at least one
triangle sharing an edge with $f$ (see Figure~\ref{fig10face}).

We have made $3$-faces happy, and $3$-vertices remain at charge $0$.  Other
vertices remain happy because $3$-faces do not share edges.  For $j\ge4$, a
$j$-vertex loses charge at most $\FL{\frac j2}$ and ends with at least
$\CL{\frac {3j}2}-6$, which is nonnegative for $j\ge4$.

Now consider a $j$-face $f$ for $j\ge10$.  It loses $1$ for every path along
its boundary such that the neighboring faces are triangles and the endpoints
have degree $3$; $f$ gives $1$ to each of those faces but regains $1$ from each
intervening vertex.  If an endpoint of a maximal such path has degree at least
$4$, then there is no net loss.  Hence the net loss for $f$ is at most
$\FL{\frac j2}$, and the final charge is at least $\CL{\frac j2}-6$, which is
nonnegative when $j\ge 11$.

Hence negative charge can occur only at $10$-faces.  A $10$-face $f$ must
lose more than $4$ to become negative.  This requires five paths through which
$f$ loses $1$.  The paths must be single edges sharing no vertices, and all
the vertices incident to $f$ must have degree $3$.
\end{proof}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.530in
    \rlap{\kern 1.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.530in
    \rlap{\kern 1.730in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.130in
    \rlap{\kern 2.050in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.930in
    \rlap{\kern 2.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.730in
    \rlap{\kern 2.050in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.330in
    \rlap{\kern 1.730in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.050in
    \rlap{\kern 1.490in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.330in
    \rlap{\kern 1.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 1250 1530}%
    \special{pa 1730 1530}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1730 1530}%
    \special{pa 2050 1130}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2050 1130}%
    \special{pa 2450 930}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2450 930}%
    \special{pa 2050 730}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2050 730}%
    \special{pa 1730 330}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1730 330}%
    \special{pa 1490 50}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1490 50}%
    \special{pa 1250 330}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.530in
    \rlap{\kern 1.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.530in
    \rlap{\kern 0.770in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.130in
    \rlap{\kern 0.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.930in
    \rlap{\kern 0.050in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.730in
    \rlap{\kern 0.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.330in
    \rlap{\kern 0.770in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.050in
    \rlap{\kern 1.010in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.330in
    \rlap{\kern 1.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1250 1530}%
    \special{pa 770 1530}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 770 1530}%
    \special{pa 450 1130}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 450 1130}%
    \special{pa 50 930}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 50 930}%
    \special{pa 450 730}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 450 730}%
    \special{pa 770 330}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 770 330}%
    \special{pa 1010 50}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1010 50}%
    \special{pa 1250 330}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 450 1130}%
    \special{pa 450 730}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2050 1130}%
    \special{pa 2050 730}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 770 330}%
    \special{pa 1730 330}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 1530}%
    \special{pa 1250 1630}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 590 1530}%
    \special{pa 770 1530}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 770 1530}%
    \special{pa 770 1630}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1910 1530}%
    \special{pa 1730 1530}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1730 1530}%
    \special{pa 1730 1630}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.673in
    \rlap{\kern 0.393in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $4^+$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.210in
    \rlap{\kern 1.270in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $4^+$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.673in
    \rlap{\kern 2.187in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $4^+$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 650 930}%
    \special{pa 310 930}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 514 930}%
    \special{pa 446 930}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 526 950}%
    \special{pa 446 930}%
    \special{pa 526 910}%
    \special{pa 526 950}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 150 690}%
    \special{pa 290 910}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 206 778}%
    \special{pa 234 822}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 208 744}%
    \special{pa 234 822}%
    \special{pa 174 765}%
    \special{pa 208 744}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 150 1170}%
    \special{pa 290 950}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 206 1082}%
    \special{pa 234 1038}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 174 1095}%
    \special{pa 234 1038}%
    \special{pa 208 1116}%
    \special{pa 174 1095}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1850 930}%
    \special{pa 2190 930}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 1986 930}%
    \special{pa 2054 930}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1974 910}%
    \special{pa 2054 930}%
    \special{pa 1974 950}%
    \special{pa 1974 910}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2350 690}%
    \special{pa 2210 910}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 2294 778}%
    \special{pa 2266 822}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2326 765}%
    \special{pa 2266 822}%
    \special{pa 2292 744}%
    \special{pa 2326 765}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2350 1170}%
    \special{pa 2210 950}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 2294 1082}%
    \special{pa 2266 1038}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2292 1116}%
    \special{pa 2266 1038}%
    \special{pa 2326 1095}%
    \special{pa 2292 1116}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1010 550}%
    \special{pa 1010 270}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 1010 438}%
    \special{pa 1010 382}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 990 462}%
    \special{pa 1010 382}%
    \special{pa 1030 462}%
    \special{pa 990 462}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1150 50}%
    \special{pa 1030 230}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 1102 122}%
    \special{pa 1078 158}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1139 103}%
    \special{pa 1078 158}%
    \special{pa 1106 80}%
    \special{pa 1139 103}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 870 50}%
    \special{pa 990 230}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 918 122}%
    \special{pa 942 158}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 914 80}%
    \special{pa 942 158}%
    \special{pa 881 103}%
    \special{pa 914 80}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1490 550}%
    \special{pa 1490 270}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 1490 438}%
    \special{pa 1490 382}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1470 462}%
    \special{pa 1490 382}%
    \special{pa 1510 462}%
    \special{pa 1470 462}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1630 50}%
    \special{pa 1510 230}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 1582 122}%
    \special{pa 1558 158}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1619 103}%
    \special{pa 1558 158}%
    \special{pa 1586 80}%
    \special{pa 1619 103}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1350 50}%
    \special{pa 1470 230}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 1398 122}%
    \special{pa 1422 158}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1394 80}%
    \special{pa 1422 158}%
    \special{pa 1361 103}%
    \special{pa 1394 80}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 470 730}%
    \special{pa 850 810}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 622 762}%
    \special{pa 698 778}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 624 742}%
    \special{pa 698 778}%
    \special{pa 616 781}%
    \special{pa 624 742}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2030 730}%
    \special{pa 1650 810}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 1878 762}%
    \special{pa 1802 778}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1884 781}%
    \special{pa 1802 778}%
    \special{pa 1876 742}%
    \special{pa 1884 781}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 350}%
    \special{pa 1250 730}%
    \special{da 0.040}%
    \special{pa 1250 502}%
    \special{pa 1250 578}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1270 498}%
    \special{pa 1250 578}%
    \special{pa 1230 498}%
    \special{pa 1270 498}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.630in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 2.500in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Discharging for Lemma~\ref{10facelem}\label{fig10face}}
\end{figure}

\vspace{-1pc}

\begin{theorem}[\cite{B1996,SZ0}]\label{10face}
Every plane graph having no 4-cycle and no $j$-face with $5\le j\le 9$ is
3-colorable.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
A smallest counterexample $G$ must be 4-critical, and hence it has minimum
degree at least 3 and is 2-connected.  Since there is no $4$-cycle, no two
3-faces share an edge.
By Lemma~\ref{10face}, we may thus assume that $G$ is embedded with at least
one 10-face $C$, whose vertices all have degree 3.  Let $f$ be a proper
3-coloring of $G-V(C)$.  Since each vertex on $C$ has exactly one neighbor
outside $C$, two colors remain available at each vertex of $C$.  Since even
cycles are 2-choosable, the coloring can be completed.
\end{proof}

{\small

\begin{exercise}
Let $G$ be a simple plane graph with $\delta(G)\ge 3$.  Prove that $G$ has a
$3$-vertex on a $5^-$-face or a $5^-$-vertex on a triangle.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Lebesgue~\cite{Le})
Strengthen the previous exercise by proving that every plane graph $G$ with
$\delta(G)\ge3$ contains a $3$-vertex on a $5^-$-face, a $4$-vertex on a
$3$-face, or a $5$-vertex with four incident $3$-faces.  (Comment: Lebesgue
phrased the proof only for $3$-connected plane graphs.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Cranston~\cite{C1})
Let $G$ be a plane graph with $\Delta(G)\ge 7$.  Prove that $G$ has either two
$3$-faces with a common edge or an edge with weight at most $\Delta(G)+2$.
Conclude that if $G$ is a plane graph with $\Delta(G)\ge 7$ and no two
$3$-faces sharing an edge, then $G$ is $(\Delta(G)+1)$-edge-choosable.
(Hint: Use balanced charging.  Comment: Cranston proved that the same
conditions are also sufficient when $\Delta(G)\ge6$, which implies several
earlier results.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{albertson}
Prove that every plane triangulation with minimum degree 5 has two $3$-faces
sharing an edge such that the non-shared vertices have degree-sum at most $11$.
(Hint: Use vertex charging; $6$-vertices that give charge to $5$-neighbors will
need charge from $7^+$-neighbors.
Comment: Albertson~\cite{A} used this configuration in a proof that
$\alpha(G)\ge \frac{2n}9$ when $G$ is an $n$-vertex planar graph with no separating
triangle, without using the Four Color Theorem or the language of discharging.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Dvo\v{r}ak, Kawarabayashi, and Thomas~\cite{DKT})
Let $C$ be the outer boundary in a 2-connected triangle-free plane graph $G$
that is not a cycle.  If $C$ has length at most $6$, and every vertex not on
$C$ has degree at least $3$, then $G$ contains a bounded $4$-face or a proper
$5$-face, where a $5$-face is {\it proper} if (at least) four of its vertices
have degree $3$ and are not on $C$.  (Comment: This result was used
in~\cite{DKT} to give a new proof of Gr\"otzsch's Theorem~\cite{Gr} that
triangle-free planar graphs are $3$-colorable.  The proof in~\cite{DKT} used
vertex charging, but using face charging is simpler.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{totdelt}
(Borodin~\cite{B89})
Using Lemma~\ref{altcyc}, adapt the proof of Theorem~\ref{list14}
to show that $\chi''_\ell(G)=\Delta(G)+1$ when $G$ is a planar graph with
$\Delta(G)\ge14$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{no45}
Let $G$ be a plane graph having no $4$-cycle and no face with length in
$\{4,\ldots,k\}$.  Use discharging to prove that the average face length in $G$
is at least $6-\frac{18}{k+4}$.  Conclude that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3+\FR9{2k-1}$.  In
particular, ${\rm{mad}}(G)<4$ when $G$ is a plane graph having no $4$-face or
$5$-face.
\end{exercise}

}

\section{Light Subgraphs of Planar Graphs}\label{seclight}

We have noted that in inductive proofs for $\chi_\ell'(G)\le k$, a light edge $uv$
(that is, satisfying $d_G(u)+d_G(v)\le k+1$) is reducible, since extending a
proper edge-coloring of $G-uv$ to $G$ only requires the color on $uv$ to avoid
the colors on $k-1$ other edges.  Planar graphs are also guaranteed to have
light copies of other subgraphs, often by discharging.

The Four Color Theorem begins with light subgraphs --- specifically, light
vertices.  A planar graph has a $5^-$-vertex.  After showing that
$4^-$-vertices are reducible for proper $4$-coloring, attention turns to
triangulations with minimum degree $5$.  Wernicke~\cite{Wer} guaranteed an
edge with weight at most $11$ in such a graph; in Lemma~\ref{kotzig} we will
prove more.  Further light subgraphs (and other configurations) are generated
via discharging rules, and we seek reducible configurations.  Unfortunately,
the details become rather complicated.

The initial proof by Appel and Haken (working with Koch) involved 1936
reducible configurations.  The unavoidable set was generated by hand, but the
details of proving reducibility were so lengthy that they were checked by
computer.  The publication comprised nearly 140 pages in two
papers~\cite{AH771,AHK} plus over 400 pages of microfiche~\cite{AH773,AH774}.
With further explanations, this became a 741-page book~\cite{AH89} (see
also~\cite{AH86}).

Some researchers objected to the use of computers.  Robertson, Sanders,
Seymour, and Thomas~\cite{RSST} looked for a simpler proof; they wound up using
the same approach.  Their unavoidable set had only 633 configurations and 32
discharging rules, but they still needed a computer.  With a faster computer
and simpler arguments, their proof ran in only 20 minutes instead of the
original 1200 hours.

Not all parts of these proofs are hopelessly complicated.  Appel and
Haken~\cite{AH79} published a shorter paper with simpler discharging to prove
that for planar triangulations with minimum degree $5$ but no adjacent
$5$-vertices there is an unavoidable set of $47$ configurations likely to be
reducible; in \cite{AHM} there is an even shorter such list, whose reducibility
they showed.

\nobreak
Stronger results later followed.  Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas~\cite{RSTh}
used the Four Color Theorem (in a paper that won the 1994 Fulkerson Prize)
to prove the case $k=6$ of Hadwiger's Conjecture: graphs not having $K_6$ as a
minor are $5$-colorable (the case $k=5$ is equivalent to the Four Color
Theorem, as shown by Wagner~\cite{Wag}).

Using the planar dual, Tait~\cite{Tait} showed that $4$-colorability of planar
triangulations is equivalent to $3$-edge-colorability of $3$-regular
$2$-edge-connected planar graphs.  Planar graphs contain no subdivision of the
(nonplanar) Petersen graph.  Hence Tutte's conjecture that $3$-regular
$2$-edge-connected graphs containing no Petersen-subdivision are
$3$-edge-colorable is stronger than the Four Color Theorem.  In 2001,
Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, and Thomas announced a proof of this.  First
Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas~\cite{RST} reduced the conjecture to proving it
for two special classes of graphs: ``apex'' graphs and ``doublecross'' graphs.
However,~\cite{RST} relies on an unpublished manuscript~\cite{RSTmin}.  Later,
3-edge-colorability was proved for the two special classes by Sanders, Seymour,
and Thomas, but this also has not been published.  In 2012, Seymour described
this proof, with its reliance on discharging and many reducible configurations,
as ``Repeat the proof of the 4CT (twice)''.

The Four Color Theorem uses discharging and reducibility as our examples do,
but its details remain too lengthy for discussion here.  Instead, we will
simply assume its correctness and resume giving simpler results to explain
various ideas and techniques that arise in discharging proofs and their
applications.

We continue with light subgraphs, a subject surveyed by Jendrol' and
Voss~\cite{JV}.  We focus on light edges, which have been thoroughly studied.
Edges are small enough that the best bounds on the weight of light edges in
various settings can be determined by discharging, and yet they have many
applications.

The best-known result on light edges is Kotzig's Theorem~\cite{Ko}: every
$3$-connected planar graph has an edge of weight at most $13$.
Borodin~\cite{B89} later extended it.  A {\it normal plane map} is a plane
multigraph such that every vertex degree and face length is at least $3$;
Euler's Formula holds also in this setting.  Jendrol'~\cite{Je,JV} gave a short
proof of the extension that every normal plane map $G$ has an edge with weight
at most 11 or a $3$-vertex with a $10^-$-neighbor.  Most applications of the
lemma (including in this paper) use only this statement.  In fact, Borodin
proved more.  We extend the proof by Jendrol' to obtain Borodin's stronger
statement, which we will apply in Theorem~\ref{larbthm}.  Discharging yields
a short proof.

\begin{lemma}[Borodin~\cite{B89}]\label{kotzig}\label{3alt4}
Every normal plane map $G$ has an edge with weight at most 11 or a $4$-cycle
through two $3$-vertices and a common $10^-$-neighbor.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
If any face has length more than $3$, then adding a chord does not create light
edges (it may create multi-edges).  Hence we may assume that every face has
length $3$.  Assume that $G$ has no light edge, and give initial charges by
vertex charging.

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Every $5^-$ vertex $v$ takes charge $\frac{6-d(v)}{d(v)}$ from each
$7^+$-neighbor.

\medskip
Since $G$ is a triangulation without light edges, a $k$-vertex sends charge to
at most $\FL{\frac k2}$ vertices.  Since a $7$-vertex sends charge only to
$5$-vertices, it loses at most $3\cdot \FR15$ and remains positive.  An
$8$-vertex sends charge only to $4^+$-vertices and loses at most $4\cdot\FR12$,
remaining nonnegative.  When $d(v)\ge11$, neighbors of $v$ may have degree $3$
and take charge $1$, but the final charge is at least $\CL{\frac{d(v)}2}-6$,
again nonnegative.

Finally, suppose $d(v)\in\{9,10\}$.  Since faces have length $3$, the neighbors
of $v$ form a closed walk of length $d(v)$ when followed in order, and each
$3$-vertex appears only once in this walk.  With light edges and the specified
$4$-cycles forbidden, $3$-vertices must be separated by at least three steps
along this walk.

Hence a $9$-vertex has at most three $3$-neighbors, and when it has three
it ends with charge $0$, since it loses no other charge.  Similarly it may have
two $3$-neighbors and up to two $4$-neighbors, reaching charge $0$, or one
$3$-neighbor and up to three $4$-neighbors, losing charge at most $\FR52$.
A $10$-vertex may also have three $3$-neighbors, or two $3$-neighbors and three
$4$-neighbors, or other combinations losing less charge.  The total charge lost
is at most $\FR72$, and the final charge is positive.
\end{proof}

Further results on light edges for planar graphs with large girth appear in
Lemma~\ref{girth7} and in Exercises~\ref{edgir1}--\ref{edgirn}.  We will apply
light edges in Theorems~\ref{listtot}
and~\ref{sqdelta}.

We discussed total coloring in Section~\ref{seclistedge}.  Now consider
coloring vertices and faces instead of vertices and edges.  Ringel~\cite{R65}
conjectured the following theorem, proved by Borodin~\cite{B84} using
discharging.  The discharging argument produced a set of 35 configurations, all
then shown to be reducible (without computers).  Borodin~\cite{B95} later
simplified the proof.

\begin{theorem}[Borodin~\cite{B84,B95}]\label{6CT}
The vertices and faces of any plane graph $G$ can be colored using six colors
so that elements adjacent or incident in $G$ or its dual receive different
colors.
\end{theorem}

Beyond total coloring, an {\it entire coloring} of a plane graph $G$ colors
its vertices, edges, and faces so that any two elements adjacent or incident in
$G$ or its dual have distinct colors.  Let $\chi'''(G)$ be the least number of
colors needed (also $\chi_{VEF}$ is used).  Kronk and Mitchem~\cite{KM1}
introduced entire coloring and conjectured $\chi'''(G)\le \Delta(G)+4$ for every
simple plane graph $G$.  Equality holds for $K_4$ (see Figure~\ref{figK4}).  It
seems unknown whether there are infinitely many sharpness examples; perhaps
fewer colors suffice when $\Delta(G)$ is sufficiently large.

\begin{figure}[h]
{\small
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.953in
    \rlap{\kern 0.847in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.159in
    \rlap{\kern 0.847in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.350in
    \rlap{\kern 1.535in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.350in
    \rlap{\kern 0.159in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 847 159}%
    \special{pa 1535 1350}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1535 1350}%
    \special{pa 159 1350}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 159 1350}%
    \special{pa 847 159}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 847 953}%
    \special{pa 847 159}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 847 953}%
    \special{pa 1535 1350}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 847 953}%
    \special{pa 159 1350}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.914in
    \rlap{\kern 0.926in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.556in
    \rlap{\kern 1.641in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 0.847in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.192in
    \rlap{\kern 0.847in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.463in
    \rlap{\kern 1.647in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.834in
    \rlap{\kern 0.648in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.463in
    \rlap{\kern 0.047in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 4\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.834in
    \rlap{\kern 1.045in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 4\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.556in
    \rlap{\kern 0.906in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 5\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.470in
    \rlap{\kern 0.847in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 5\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.112in
    \rlap{\kern 1.244in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.715in
    \rlap{\kern 0.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.715in
    \rlap{\kern 1.244in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 7\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.112in
    \rlap{\kern 0.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 7\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.509in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 1.800in
  }%
}%
}
}

\vspace{-.5pc}

\caption{Entire coloring of $K_4$\label{figK4}}
\end{figure}

This conjecture has been proved.  It was proved for $\Delta(G)\le3$ by Kronk
and Mitchem~\cite{KM2}, for $\Delta(G)\ge7$ by Borodin~\cite{B1996e}, for
$\Delta(G)=6$ by Sanders and Zhao~\cite{SZ0.5} (corrected in~\cite{WZ}), and
for $\Delta(G)\in\{4,5\}$ by Wang and Zhu~\cite{WZ}.  Using Lemma~\ref{kotzig}
and the Four Color Theorem, it is easy to prove the conjecture for
$\Delta(G)\ge11$ (see~\cite{Bo87}; also Exercise~\ref{entire} develops another
proof for $\Delta(G)\ge7$).  The crucial step is a list version of total
coloring.

\begin{theorem}\label{listtot}
If $G$ is a simple plane graph with $\Delta(G)\ge11$, and $L$ assigns lists
of size $\Delta(G)$ to the vertices and size $\Delta(G)+2$ to the edges, then
$G$ has a total $L$-coloring.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
A minimal counterexample $G$ comes with a list assignment $L$ from which no
suitable coloring can be chosen.  If $\delta(G)\ge3$, then Lemma~\ref{kotzig}
applies.  Considering the possibility $\delta(G)\le2$ and the possible
conclusions from Lemma~\ref{kotzig}, we have three cases.

\medskip
{\it Case 1: $G$ has an edge $uv$ such that $d(u)\le2$.}

{\it Case 2: $G$ has an edge $uv$ such that $d(u)=3$ and $d(v)\le 10$.}

{\it Case 3: $G$ has an edge $uv$ such that $d(u)\le5$ and $d(v)\le 7$.}
\medskip

\noindent
In each case, minimality of $G$ allows $G-uv$ to be colored from the lists.
Let $e=uv$.  Delete the color on $u$; we will recolor it later after choosing
a color for $e$.

In each case, we bound the number of colors that can now be on elements
incident to $e$.  It is at most $\Delta(G)+1$ in Case 1, at most $2+1+9$ in
Case 2, and at most $4+1+6$ in Case 3.  Since $|L(e)|=\Delta(G)+2\ge 13$,
a color remains available for $e$.

Finally, we color $u$ to avoid the colors on incident edges and neighboring
vertices.  Since $d(u)\le5$, at most $10$ colors need to be avoided,
and $|L(u)|=\Delta(G)\ge11$.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}
For simple plane graphs $G$ with $\Delta(G)\!\!\ge\!\!11$ and no cut-edge,
$\chi'''(G)\!\!\le\!\! \Delta(G)\!+\!4$.
\looseness-1
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
First, properly color the faces using four colors (by the Four Color Theorem),
leaving $\Delta(G)+2$ colors at each edge and at least $\Delta(G)$ at each
vertex.  Now apply Theorem~\ref{listtot}.
\end{proof}

We have mentioned that structure theorems should have multiple applications.
Our next structure theorem has this property.

\begin{lemma}\label{12vert}
Every planar graph has a $5^-$-vertex with at most two $12^+$-neighbors.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Adding an edge cannot give any vertex the desired property (although it can
take the property away); hence it suffices to prove the claim when $G$ is a
triangulation.

Assume that $G$ has no such vertex, so $\delta(G)\ge3$.  Assign charge by
degrees; ${\overline{d}}(G)<6$.  Every $5^-$-vertex has at least three $12^+$-neighbors.
Let each $5^-$-vertex $u$ take $\frac{6-d(u)}3$ from each $12^+$-neighbor.
Now $5^-$-vertices are happy, and $j$-vertices with $6\le j\le 11$ lose no
charge, so it suffices to show that $12^+$-vertices do not lose too much.

Let $v$ be a $12^+$-vertex.  Since $G$ is a triangulation, the neighbors of $v$
form a cycle $C$.  Let $H$ be the subgraph of $C$ induced by its vertices
having degree at most $5$ in $G$.  Each $5^-$-vertex $w$ has at least three
$12^+$-neighbors, so $d_H(w)\le d_G(w)-3$.  If all neighbors of $v$ have degree
$5$, then $v$ loses $\frac{d(v)}3$ and finishes with $\FR23d(v)$, which
is at least $8$.

Otherwise, the components of $H$ are paths (bold in Figure~\ref{figtwo12}).
Combine such a $k$-vertex path $P$ with the next vertex on $C$, which receives
no charge from $v$.  If $k=1$, then $v$ gives at most $1$ to these two
vertices.  If $k>1$, then $v$ gives at most $\FR13$ to internal vertices of $P$
(degree at least $5$) and at most $\FR23$ to its endpoints (degree at least
$4$).  Hence the $k+1$ vertices receive at most $0+2(\FR23)+(k-2)(\FR13)$ from
$v$.  This equals $\frac{k+2}3$, which is less than $\frac{k+1}2$ when $k>1$.
Hence $v$ loses in total at most $\frac{d(v)}2$, leaving at least $6$ when
$d(v)\ge12$.
\end{proof}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 0.300in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.900in
    \rlap{\kern 0.300in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.900in
    \rlap{\kern 0.675in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 300 150}%
    \special{pa 300 600}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 330 480}%
    \special{pa 300 600}%
    \special{pa 270 480}%
    \special{pa 330 480}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 300 600}%
    \special{pa 300 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 300 900}%
    \special{pa 675 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 300 900}%
    \special{pa 0 900}%
    \special{da 0.075}%
    \special{pa 675 900}%
    \special{pa 975 900}%
    \special{da 0.075}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{ar 487 900 300 150 0 6.28319}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 0.300in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.525in
    \rlap{\kern 0.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 1\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.237in
    \rlap{\kern 0.300in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $k=1$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 2.362in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.900in
    \rlap{\kern 1.800in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.900in
    \rlap{\kern 2.175in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.900in
    \rlap{\kern 2.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.900in
    \rlap{\kern 2.925in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.900in
    \rlap{\kern 3.300in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 2362 150}%
    \special{pa 2700 600}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2652 486}%
    \special{pa 2700 600}%
    \special{pa 2604 522}%
    \special{pa 2652 486}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2700 600}%
    \special{pa 2925 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2362 150}%
    \special{pa 2475 600}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2475 476}%
    \special{pa 2475 600}%
    \special{pa 2417 491}%
    \special{pa 2475 476}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2475 600}%
    \special{pa 2550 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2362 150}%
    \special{pa 2025 600}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2121 522}%
    \special{pa 2025 600}%
    \special{pa 2073 486}%
    \special{pa 2121 522}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2025 600}%
    \special{pa 1800 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2362 150}%
    \special{pa 2250 600}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2308 491}%
    \special{pa 2250 600}%
    \special{pa 2250 476}%
    \special{pa 2308 491}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2250 600}%
    \special{pa 2175 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 28}%
    \special{pa 1800 900}%
    \special{pa 2925 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2925 900}%
    \special{pa 3300 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 1800 900}%
    \special{pa 1500 900}%
    \special{da 0.075}%
    \special{pa 3300 900}%
    \special{pa 3600 900}%
    \special{da 0.075}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{ar 2550 900 862 150 0 6.28319}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 2.362in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.562in
    \rlap{\kern 2.362in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR13$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.237in
    \rlap{\kern 2.362in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $k=4$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.562in
    \rlap{\kern 1.912in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR23$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.562in
    \rlap{\kern 2.812in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\FR23$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1800 900}%
    \special{pa 1800 1012}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2925 900}%
    \special{pa 2925 1012}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2100 1012}%
    \special{pa 2175 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2175 900}%
    \special{pa 2250 1012}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2475 1012}%
    \special{pa 2550 900}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2550 900}%
    \special{pa 2625 1012}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.237in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 3.600in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-.8pc}

\caption{Final case for Lemma~\ref{12vert}\label{figtwo12}}
\end{figure}

Lemma~\ref{12vert} can be viewed as strengthening the guarantee of light
vertices: there must be a light vertex with not too much heaviness among its
neighbors.  It can be used to strengthen results that follow from the basic
existence of light vertices (that is, $5^-$-vertices) in planar graphs, a fact
that follows from Euler's Formula and does not need discharging.  For example,
consider the {\it arboricity} of a graph $G$, written $\Upsilon(G)$, defined to
be the minimum number of forests whose union is $G$.  Nash-Williams~\cite{NW}
famously proved that for every graph $G$, the trivial lower bound is the exact
value.

\begin{theorem}[\cite{NW}]\label{arb}
Always $\Upsilon(G)={\max_{H\subseteq G}\frac{|E(H)|}{|V(H)|-1}}$.
\end{theorem}

Although there is a short general proof using matroids, for planar graphs the
existence of $5^-$-vertices yields a direct inductive construction of
decompositions into three forests.  We include this in Exercise~\ref{planarb}
to illustrate a technique for reducibility with triangulations.

Lemma~\ref{12vert} was improved by Balogh, Kochol, Pluhar, and Yu~\cite{BKPY}
to guarantee a $5^-$vertex having at most two $11^+$-neighbors, proved by a
much longer discharging argument than in Lemma~\ref{12vert}.  The result is
sharp in that ``11'' cannot be replaced by ``10'' (the graph obtained by
adding a vertex of degree $3$ in each face of the icosahedron has three
$10$-neighbors for each $5^-$-vertex).  From this result they proved that every
planar graph decomposes into three forests, among which one has maximum degree
at most 8.  Lemma~\ref{12vert} allows the degree of the third forest to be
bounded by $9$ (Exercise~\ref{planarb}).

We also apply Lemma~\ref{12vert} to the problem of coloring the square of a
planar graph, where there is another well-known conjecture (the original
conjecture was more general).

\begin{conjecture}[Wegner's Conjecture~\cite{Weg}]\label{wegner}
If $G$ is planar, then $\chi(G^2)\le \FL{\FR32\Delta(G)}+1$ for
$\Delta(G)\ge8$; also $\chi(G^2)\le \Delta(G)+5$ for $4\le \Delta(G)\le 7$
and $\chi(G^2)\le 7$ for $\Delta(G)\le3$.
\end{conjecture}

Wegner gave sharpness constructions; fixing $\Delta(G)$, these are planar
graphs of diameter $2$ (so $\chi(G^2)=|V(G)|$) with the most vertices.  The
general situation uses graphs studied by Erd\H{o}s and R\'enyi~\cite{ER}, shown
on the left in Figure~\ref{figweg}.  The other graphs there with maximum degree
$k$ have diameter $2$ with $k+5$ vertices for $4\le k\le 7$, taken
from~\cite{HeS} (the half-edges in the graph for $k=6$ meet at the eleventh
vertex).  Wegner found the three leftmost graphs.

\begin{figure}[hbt]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.133in
    \rlap{\kern 0.379in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.101in
    \rlap{\kern 0.027in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 0.091in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.229in
    \rlap{\kern 0.155in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.229in
    \rlap{\kern 0.603in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.165in
    \rlap{\kern 0.667in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.101in
    \rlap{\kern 0.731in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.453in
    \rlap{\kern 0.059in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.453in
    \rlap{\kern 0.699in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 379 133}%
    \special{pa 27 101}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 379 133}%
    \special{pa 91 165}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 379 133}%
    \special{pa 155 229}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 379 133}%
    \special{pa 603 229}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 379 133}%
    \special{pa 667 165}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 379 133}%
    \special{pa 731 101}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 379 133}%
    \special{pa 59 453}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 379 133}%
    \special{pa 699 453}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 59 453}%
    \special{pa 27 101}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 59 453}%
    \special{pa 91 165}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 59 453}%
    \special{pa 155 229}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 699 453}%
    \special{pa 603 229}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 699 453}%
    \special{pa 667 165}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 699 453}%
    \special{pa 731 101}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.773in
    \rlap{\kern 0.379in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.667in
    \rlap{\kern 0.379in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 0.379in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.880in
    \rlap{\kern 0.379in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 59 453}%
    \special{pa 379 773}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 59 453}%
    \special{pa 379 667}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 59 453}%
    \special{pa 379 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 59 453}%
    \special{pa 379 880}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 699 453}%
    \special{pa 379 773}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 699 453}%
    \special{pa 379 667}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 699 453}%
    \special{pa 379 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 699 453}%
    \special{pa 379 880}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.258in
    \rlap{\kern 1.961in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.862in
    \rlap{\kern 1.961in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.862in
    \rlap{\kern 1.357in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.258in
    \rlap{\kern 1.357in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1961 258}%
    \special{pa 1961 862}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1961 862}%
    \special{pa 1357 862}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1357 862}%
    \special{pa 1357 258}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1357 258}%
    \special{pa 1961 258}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.347in
    \rlap{\kern 1.659in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 1.872in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.773in
    \rlap{\kern 1.659in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 1.445in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1659 560}%
    \special{pa 1659 347}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1659 560}%
    \special{pa 1872 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1659 560}%
    \special{pa 1659 773}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1659 560}%
    \special{pa 1445 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 1.659in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1659 347}%
    \special{pa 1961 258}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1961 258}%
    \special{pa 1872 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1872 560}%
    \special{pa 1961 862}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1961 862}%
    \special{pa 1659 773}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1659 773}%
    \special{pa 1357 862}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1357 862}%
    \special{pa 1445 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1445 560}%
    \special{pa 1357 258}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1357 258}%
    \special{pa 1659 347}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.667in
    \rlap{\kern 2.832in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.453in
    \rlap{\kern 2.832in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 3.017in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.773in
    \rlap{\kern 3.017in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.880in
    \rlap{\kern 2.832in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.773in
    \rlap{\kern 2.648in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 2.648in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2832 453}%
    \special{pa 3017 773}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3017 773}%
    \special{pa 2648 773}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2648 773}%
    \special{pa 2832 453}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2832 453}%
    \special{pa 3017 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3017 773}%
    \special{pa 2832 880}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2648 773}%
    \special{pa 2648 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.240in
    \rlap{\kern 2.832in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.880in
    \rlap{\kern 3.202in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.880in
    \rlap{\kern 2.463in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2832 667}%
    \special{pa 2832 240}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2832 240}%
    \special{pa 3202 880}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3202 880}%
    \special{pa 2463 880}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2832 240}%
    \special{pa 2463 880}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2463 880}%
    \special{pa 2832 667}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2832 667}%
    \special{pa 3202 880}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{ar 3314 945 853 853 -3.065835 -2.170178}%
    \special{ar 2832 111 853 853 1.122978 2.018615}%
    \special{ar 2351 945 853 853 -0.971415 -0.075757}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.375in
    \rlap{\kern 4.219in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 4.326in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.745in
    \rlap{\kern 4.219in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.745in
    \rlap{\kern 4.006in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 3.899in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.375in
    \rlap{\kern 4.006in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 4219 375}%
    \special{pa 4326 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4326 560}%
    \special{pa 4219 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4219 745}%
    \special{pa 4006 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4006 745}%
    \special{pa 3899 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3899 560}%
    \special{pa 4006 375}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4006 375}%
    \special{pa 4219 375}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4219 375}%
    \special{pa 3899 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3899 560}%
    \special{pa 4219 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.133in
    \rlap{\kern 4.112in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 4.539in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.987in
    \rlap{\kern 4.112in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 3.686in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 4112 133}%
    \special{pa 4539 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4539 560}%
    \special{pa 4112 987}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4112 987}%
    \special{pa 3686 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3686 560}%
    \special{pa 4112 133}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4112 133}%
    \special{pa 4219 375}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4219 375}%
    \special{pa 4539 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4539 560}%
    \special{pa 4219 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4219 745}%
    \special{pa 4112 987}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4112 987}%
    \special{pa 4006 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4006 745}%
    \special{pa 3686 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3686 560}%
    \special{pa 4006 375}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4006 375}%
    \special{pa 4112 133}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4112 133}%
    \special{pa 4112 27}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4646 560}%
    \special{pa 3579 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4112 987}%
    \special{pa 4112 1093}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.375in
    \rlap{\kern 5.606in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 5.713in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.745in
    \rlap{\kern 5.606in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.745in
    \rlap{\kern 5.393in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 5.286in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.375in
    \rlap{\kern 5.393in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 5606 375}%
    \special{pa 5713 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5713 560}%
    \special{pa 5606 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5606 745}%
    \special{pa 5393 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5393 745}%
    \special{pa 5286 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5286 560}%
    \special{pa 5393 375}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5393 375}%
    \special{pa 5606 375}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5606 375}%
    \special{pa 5286 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5286 560}%
    \special{pa 5606 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.133in
    \rlap{\kern 5.499in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 5.926in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.987in
    \rlap{\kern 5.499in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.560in
    \rlap{\kern 5.073in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 5499 133}%
    \special{pa 5926 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5926 560}%
    \special{pa 5499 987}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 987}%
    \special{pa 5073 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5073 560}%
    \special{pa 5499 133}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 133}%
    \special{pa 5606 375}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5606 375}%
    \special{pa 5926 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5926 560}%
    \special{pa 5606 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5606 745}%
    \special{pa 5499 987}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 987}%
    \special{pa 5393 745}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5393 745}%
    \special{pa 5073 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5073 560}%
    \special{pa 5393 375}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5393 375}%
    \special{pa 5499 133}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 133}%
    \special{pa 5499 27}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5926 560}%
    \special{pa 5073 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 987}%
    \special{pa 5499 1093}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.027in
    \rlap{\kern 5.499in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.093in
    \rlap{\kern 5.499in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 5499 27}%
    \special{pa 5073 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 27}%
    \special{pa 5499 133}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 27}%
    \special{pa 5926 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 1093}%
    \special{pa 5073 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 1093}%
    \special{pa 5499 987}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5499 1093}%
    \special{pa 5926 560}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{ar 5466 560 534 534 -1.507603 1.507603}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.120in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 6.000in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Large graphs with diameter $2$ and fixed maximum degree\label{figweg}}
\end{figure}

For upper bounds, van den Heuvel and McGuinness~\cite{HM} proved
$\chi(G^2)\le 2\Delta(G)+25$, but their argument also yields
$\chi_\ell(G^2)\le 2\Delta(G)+25$.  We present a weaker version of this, showing
that $\chi(G^2)\le 2\Delta(G)+34$ when $G$ is planar.  To keep our additive
constant small, we use an enhanced version of Lemma~\ref{kotzig}.  Instead of
letting each $5^-$-vertex $v$ take $\frac{6-d(v)}{d(v)}$ from each
$7^+$-neighbor, change the rule for $5$-vertices to take $\FR14$ from each
$7^+$-neighbor.  Now a $5$-vertex becomes happy when it has at least four
$7^+$-neighbors.  With $4^-$-neighbors forbidden, a $7$-vertex lost at most
$\FR35$ before, now at most $\FR34$, so again it remains happy.  Hence we
conclude the following.

\begin{lemma}\label{kotzig566}
Every normal plane map $G$ has a $3$-vertex with a $10^-$-neighbor, or a
$4$-vertex with a $7^-$-neighbor, or a $5$-vertex with two $6^-$-neighbors.
\end{lemma}

Our first bound on $\chi(G^2)$ helps when $\Delta(G)$ is small.
It slightly refines an idea from~\cite{Jo}.

\begin{thm}\label{sq7k}
If $G$ is a planar graph, then
$\chi_\ell(G^2)\le\begin{cases}
 \Delta(G)^2+1& \textrm{when }\Delta(G)\le5,\\
 7\Delta(G)-7& \textrm{when }\Delta(G)\ge6.  \end{cases} $
\end{thm}
\begin{proof}
For $\Delta(G)\le5$, the claim is just the trivial upper bound from
$\Delta(G^2)$, so we may assume $\Delta(G)\ge6$.

\nobreak
Index the vertices from $v_n$ to $v_1$ as follows.  Having chosen
$\VEC vn{i+1}$, let $G_i=G-\{\VEC vn{i+1}\}$.  If $\delta(G_i)\le 3$,
then let $v_i$ be a vertex of minimum degree; otherwise let $v$ be a vertex
as guaranteed by Lemma~\ref{kotzig566}.  Let $S_i=\{\VEC v1i\}$.  We choose
colors for vertices in the order $\VEC v1n$ so that the coloring of $S_i$
satisfies all the constraints in the full graph $G^2$ from pairs of vertices in
$S_i$.

Let $j=|N(v_i)\cap S_i|$; by the choice of the ordering, $j\le 5$.  The other
neighbors of $v_i$ occur later and are not yet colored.  However, $v_i$ must
avoid the colors on the neighbors in $S_i$ of these vertices; there may be up
to $4(\Delta(G)-j)$ such colors.  For $u\in N(v_i)\cap S_i$, all neighbors of
$u$ may lie in $S_i$, so there may be as many as $d(u)$ colors that $v_i$ must
avoid due to $u$.

If $j\le 3$, then the number of colors $v_i$ must avoid is at most
$4(\Delta(G)-j)+j\Delta(G)$.  If $j=4$, then the bound is $7\Delta(G)-9$, since
$v_i$ has a $7^-$-neighbor in $S_i$.  If $j=5$, then it is $7\Delta(G)-8$,
since $v_i$ has two $6^-$-neighbors in $S_i$.  Hence always the bound is at
most $7\Delta(G)-8$.
\end{proof}

Using Lemma~\ref{12vert} instead of Lemma~\ref{kotzig566}, a vertex with $j$
earlier neighbors must avoid at most $6\Delta(G)+7j-2$ colors.  Hence
$\chi_\ell(G^2)\le 6\Delta(G)+33$.  We strengthen this bound.

\begin{thm}\label{sqdelta}
If $G$ is a planar graph, then $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le 2\Delta(G)+34$.
\end{thm}

\begin{proof}
Theorem~\ref{sq7k} provides upper bounds that are at most $2\Delta(G)+34$ when
$\Delta(G)\le 8$.  Hence we may assume $\Delta(G)\ge 9$.

Let $G$ be a minimal counterexample, with list assignment $L$ from which no
such coloring can be chosen.  We will form $G'$ by contracting an edge
of $G$ incident to a $5^-$-vertex $v$, viewed as absorbing $v$ into the other
endpoint $u$; the new vertex retains the list assigned to $u$.  All the
constraints forcing vertices of $G$ to have distinct colors are present also in
$G'$, so any proper coloring of the square of $G'$ can also be used on $V(G')$
in $G$.  If $\Delta(G')$ is small enough, then the induction hypothesis applies
to properly color the square of $G'$ from lists of the desired size, and the
task is only to show that few enough other vertices are within distance $2$ of
$v$ in $G$, leaving a color available for $v$ to complete an $L$-coloring of
$G^2$.

\nobreak
If $\delta(G)\le 2$, then let $v$ be a vertex of minimum degree.  The
contracted vertex has degree at most $\Delta(G)$.  At most $2\Delta(G)$
vertices are within distance $2$ of $v$, which leaves a color available for
$v$.  Hence we may assume $\delta(G)\ge3$,
so Lemmas~\ref{kotzig566} and \ref{12vert} apply.

{\it Case 1: $9\le \Delta(G)\le 13$.}
In this case we prove $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le 52\le 2\Delta(G)+34$.  Let $v$ be a vertex
as guaranteed by Lemma~\ref{kotzig566}: a $3$-vertex with a $10^-$-neighbor, a
$4$-vertex with a $7^-$-neighbor, or a $5$-vertex with two $6^-$-neighbors.
The specified edge is the edge to be contracted, and the degree of the new
vertex is at most $11$.  Thus $\Delta(G')\le 13$, and the induction hypothesis
yields a proper $L$-coloring of the square of $G'$ from lists of size $52$
(if $\Delta(G')=8$, then $\chi_\ell(G'^2)\le 2\Delta(G')+34\le52$).  The bound on
the number of other vertices within distance $2$ of $v$ is $2\Delta(G)+10$ for
$d(v)=3$, $3\Delta(G)+7$ for $d(v)=4$, and $3\Delta(G)+12$ for $d(v)=5$.  Since
$\Delta(G)\le13$, the value in each case is at most $51$.

{\it Case 2: $\Delta(G)\ge 14$.}
Let $v$ be a vertex as guaranteed by Lemma~\ref{12vert}; note that $d(v)\le 5$.
Since $d(v)\ge3$ and $v$ has at most two $12^+$-neighbors, $v$ has an
$11^-$-neighbor; contract such an edge.  The contracted vertex has degree at
most $14$, so the induction hypothesis applies.  Also, the number of vertices
within distance $2$ of $v$ in $G$ is bounded by $2\Delta(G)+33$.
\end{proof}

The improved upper bound of $2\Delta(G)+25$ in~\cite{HM} uses a slightly
stronger version of Lemma~\ref{12vert} to improve the argument for large
$\Delta(G)$ (see Exercise~\ref{D+25}).  Their main additional work was proving
a second lemma specifically for graphs with small maximum degree.

Havet, van den Heuvel, McDiarmid, and Reed~\cite{HHMR} proved for planar graphs
that $\chi_\ell(G^2)\le (\FR32+o(1))\Delta(G)$ as $\Delta(G)\to\infty$, by
probabilistic methods.
Hence we also seek bounds below $2\Delta(G)$ when $\Delta(G)$ is ``small''.
Borodin et al.~\cite{BBGH2} proved for planar graphs that $\chi_\ell(G^2) \le 59$
when $\Delta(G)\le20$ and
$\chi_\ell(G^2)\le\max\{\Delta(G)+39,\CL{\FR95\Delta(G)}+1\}$ when
$\Delta(G)>20$.  In particular, if $\Delta(G)\ge47$, then
$\chi_\ell(G^2)\le\CL{\FR95\Delta(G)}+1$.
More generally, they proved that $G^2$ is $k$-degenerate, where
$k =\max\{\Delta(G)+38,\CL{\FR95\Delta(G)}\}$.
For the coloring problem alone, Molloy and Salavatipour~\cite{MS} proved
$\chi(G^2)\le \FR53\Delta(G)+78$ for all planar $G$.  For results in terms of
${\rm{mad}}(G)$ (without planarity), see the exercises in Section~\ref{seclist}.

\medskip
We have noted that many results for planar graphs with girth at least $g$
extend to the family of graphs $G$ with ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{2g}{g-2}$ (especially when
the proof uses vertex charging).  In some cases, planarity permits a stronger
result, meaning that obtaining the same conclusion using only a bound on
${\rm{mad}}(G)$ requires ${\rm{mad}}(G)<b$ for some $b$ smaller than $\frac{2g}{g-2}$.

For example, consider a special case of Exercise~\ref{dynamick}: every graph
$G$ with ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR83$ and $\delta(G)\ge 2$ has a $2$-vertex with a
$3^-$-neighbor.  This applies to planar graphs with girth at least $8$.  The
result in terms of ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ is sharp, since subdividing every edge of a
$4$-regular graph yields a graph $G$ with ${\rm{mad}}(G)=\FR83$ having no such
vertex.  However, the conclusion holds for planar graphs with girth $7$, which
allow ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ to be larger, so in this case planarity is needed to obtain the
best result.  The argument we present illustrates typical difficulties that may
arise when discovering discharging arguments.

\begin{lemma}\label{girth7}
Every planar graph $G$ with girth at least $7$ and $\delta(G)\ge2$ has a
$2$-vertex with a neighbor of degree at most $3$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Assume that $G$ has no such configuration.  Use face charging, giving each
vertex $v$ initial charge $2d(v)-6$ and each face $f$ initial charge
$\ell(f)-6$.  The total charge is $-12$.
Since $g$ has girth at least $7$, the only objects with negative initial charge
are $2$-vertices.  Let each $2$-vertex take $\FR12$ from each neighbor and each
incident face.  To complete the proof, we check that all vertices and faces end
with nonnegative charge.

The discharging rule ensures that $2$-vertices end with charge $0$.
Since $3$-vertices have no $2$-neighbors, their charge remains $0$.  For
$j\ge4$, a $j$-vertex may lose $\FR12$ along each edge and ends with charge at
least $2j-6-\frac j2$, which is nonnegative.

A $j$-face has at most $\FL{\frac j2}$ incident $2$-vertices, since $2$-vertices
are not adjacent.  Hence a $j$-face has final charge at least
$j-6-\FR12\FL{\frac j2}$, which is nonnegative for $j\ge8$.
To help the $7$-faces, we add another discharging rule.  When adjacent
$4^+$-vertices form an edge $e$, direct the charge $\FR12$ that each could send
to a $2$-neighbor so that instead the two faces bounded by $e$ each receive
$\FR12$.  Now when a $7$-face gives away $\FR32$ to three $2$-vertices, it
recovers $\FR12$ from the two adjacent $4^+$-vertices on its boundary and ends
with charge $0$.
\end{proof}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.376in
    \rlap{\kern 0.676in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.526in
    \rlap{\kern 2.178in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.676in
    \rlap{\kern 2.479in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.676in
    \rlap{\kern 3.079in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.526in
    \rlap{\kern 3.380in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.225in
    \rlap{\kern 3.380in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.075in
    \rlap{\kern 2.779in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.225in
    \rlap{\kern 2.178in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2178 526}%
    \special{pa 2479 676}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2479 676}%
    \special{pa 3079 676}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3079 676}%
    \special{pa 3380 526}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3380 526}%
    \special{pa 3380 225}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3380 225}%
    \special{pa 2779 75}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2779 75}%
    \special{pa 2178 225}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2178 225}%
    \special{pa 2178 526}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 75 376}%
    \special{pa 436 376}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 364 358}%
    \special{pa 436 376}%
    \special{pa 364 394}%
    \special{pa 364 358}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 436 376}%
    \special{pa 676 376}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1277 376}%
    \special{pa 916 376}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 988 394}%
    \special{pa 916 376}%
    \special{pa 988 358}%
    \special{pa 988 394}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 916 376}%
    \special{pa 676 376}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 676 75}%
    \special{pa 676 315}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 676 171}%
    \special{pa 676 219}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 694 147}%
    \special{pa 676 219}%
    \special{pa 658 147}%
    \special{pa 694 147}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 676 676}%
    \special{pa 676 436}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 676 580}%
    \special{pa 676 532}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 658 604}%
    \special{pa 676 532}%
    \special{pa 694 604}%
    \special{pa 658 604}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.376in
    \rlap{\kern 0.075in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.376in
    \rlap{\kern 1.277in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 3410 105}%
    \special{pa 3380 225}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3380 225}%
    \special{pa 3500 195}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2148 105}%
    \special{pa 2178 225}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2178 225}%
    \special{pa 2058 195}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2328 736}%
    \special{pa 2479 676}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2479 676}%
    \special{pa 2388 796}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3230 736}%
    \special{pa 3079 676}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3079 676}%
    \special{pa 3170 796}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 2539 646}%
    \special{pa 2779 646}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 3049 706}%
    \special{pa 2779 706}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 2779 646}%
    \special{pa 2779 436}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 2779 562}%
    \special{pa 2779 520}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2761 592}%
    \special{pa 2779 520}%
    \special{pa 2797 592}%
    \special{pa 2761 592}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2779 706}%
    \special{pa 2779 916}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 2779 790}%
    \special{pa 2779 832}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2797 760}%
    \special{pa 2779 832}%
    \special{pa 2761 760}%
    \special{pa 2797 760}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2479 466}%
    \special{pa 2238 496}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 2382 478}%
    \special{pa 2334 484}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2408 493}%
    \special{pa 2334 484}%
    \special{pa 2404 457}%
    \special{pa 2408 493}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3079 466}%
    \special{pa 3320 496}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 3176 478}%
    \special{pa 3224 484}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 3154 457}%
    \special{pa 3224 484}%
    \special{pa 3150 493}%
    \special{pa 3154 457}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2779 315}%
    \special{pa 2779 135}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 2779 243}%
    \special{pa 2779 207}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2761 279}%
    \special{pa 2779 207}%
    \special{pa 2797 279}%
    \special{pa 2761 279}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.916in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 3.500in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Discharging for Lemma~\ref{girth7}\label{figredir}}
\end{figure}

This proof illustrates both ``redirection'' of transmitted charge and the
phenomenon of designing discharging rules initially to make deficient vertices
happy but discovering later that additional rules are then needed to repair
other vertices that lost too much.  It turns out that balanced charging, where
$2$-vertices and $3$-vertices both need charge, yields a simpler discharging
proof of this result; see Exercise~\ref{edgir7}.

Lemma~\ref{girth7} yields a stronger result for planar graphs with girth $7$
than is possible for the corresponding bound on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$.  A graph $G$ is
\emph{dynamically $k$-choosable} if for every $k$-uniform list assignment $L$,
there is a dynamic $L$-coloring of $G$, meaning a proper $L$-coloring with the
additional property that no neighborhood with size at least $2$ is
monochromatic.  By showing that the configuration in Lemma~\ref{girth7} is
reducible (Exercise~\ref{4dynam}), Kim and Park~\cite{KP} showed that every
planar graph with girth at least $7$ is dynamically $4$-choosable.  This result
is sharp, since subdividing every edge of a non-$4$-choosable planar graph with
girth $3$ yields a planar graph with girth $6$ that is not dynamically
$4$-choosable.

\bigskip
We close this section with one of the most famous results on light subgraphs:
the existence of light triangles in planar graphs with minimum degree $5$.
This was conjectured for triangulations by Kotzig and proved in stronger form
by Borodin; see Exercise~\ref{trisharp} for a sharpness example.  We sketch the
proof because an interesting wrinkle in the discharging rules can again be
viewed as redirecting charge.  The result strengthens the early result of
Franklin~\cite{F} guaranteeing weight at most $17$ on some copy of $P_3$.
Specifically, Franklin showed that if $G$ is planar with minimum degree $5$,
then $G$ has a $5$-vertex with two $6^-$-neighbors; this is strengthened also
by Lemma~\ref{kotzig566}.

\begin{theorem}[Borodin~\cite{B1989}]\label{lighttri}
If $G$ is a simple plane graph with $\delta(G)\ge5$, then $G$ has a $3$-face
with weight at most $17$, and the bound is sharp.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
(sketch) For sharpness, add a vertex in each face of the dodecahedron joined to
the vertices of that face.  The new vertices have degree 5, and the old ones
now have degree 6.  Every face has one new vertex and two old vertices for
total weight 17.

To prove the bound, consider an edge-maximal counterexample $G$.  Every vertex
on a $4^+$-face has degree $5$, since adding a triangular chord at a
$6^+$-vertex would create only heavy $3$-faces, producing a counterexample
containing $G$.

Suppose there is no light triangle and use vertex charging, with charge
$d(v)-6$ on each vertex $v$ and $2l(f)-6$ on each face $f$.
Move charge via the following rules:

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Each $4^+$-face gives $\FR12$ to each incident vertex.

\noindent
(R2) Each $7$-vertex gives $\FR13$ to each $5$-neighbor.

\noindent
(R3) Each $8^+$-vertex gives $\FR14$ through each incident $3$-face to its
$5$-neighbors on that face, split equally if there are two such neighbors.
\medskip

It suffices to show that final charges are nonnegative.  The discharging rules
are chosen so that $4^+$-faces and $7^+$-vertices do not give away too much
charge.  (Maximality of the counterexample puts a $7$-vertex on seven
triangles, and absence of light triangles then restricts a $7$-vertex to have
at most three $5$-neighbors).

Hence the task is to prove that a $5$-vertex $v$ gains charge $1$.  When all
incident faces are triangles, avoiding light triangles restricts $v$ to have at
most two $5$-neighbors.  It also forces the other neighbors to be
$8^+$-vertices when $v$ has two $5$-neighbors.  In this and the remaining
cases (such as when $v$ lies on a $4^+$-face), it is easy to check that $v$
receives enough charge.
\end{proof}

In each discharging rule in Theorem~\ref{lighttri}, the charge given away is
the most that object can afford to lose.  Only $5$-vertices need to gain charge.
Hence it would be natural to have $8^+$-vertices give $\FR14$ to each
$5$-neighbor.  However, this would give only $\FR34$ to a $5$-vertex having two
$5$-neighbors and three $8$-neighbors.  The $5$-vertex needs to get more when
it has two $8$-neighbors on a single triangle.  Guiding the charge from
$8^+$-neighbors through the incident triangles is a way to arrange that.

\medskip

{\small

\begin{exercise}\label{kotzsharp}
Construct planar graphs to show that the bounds in Lemma~\ref{kotzig} are sharp.
That is, none of the values $10$, $7$, $6$ can be reduced in the statement that
normal plane maps have a $3$-vertex with a $10^-$-neighbor, a $4$-vertex with a
$7^-$-neighbor, or a $5$-vertex with a $6^-$-neighbor.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{Franklin}
Prove that planarity is needed in Lemma~\ref{kotzig} by showing
that a graph $G$ with ${\rm{mad}}(G)<6$ and $\delta(G)=5$ need not have a $5$-vertex
with any $6^-$-neighbor.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{trisharp}
Prove that requiring minimum degree $5$ in Theorem~\ref{lighttri} is necessary,
by constructing for each $k\in{\mathbb N}$ a planar graph with minimum degree $4$
having no triangle with weight at most $k$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{edgir1}
The argument in Remark~\ref{threadrem} with $\ell=2$ shows that $\frac{12}5$ is
the largest $\rho$ such that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\rho$ guarantees adjacent $2$-vertices
in $G$.  Note that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{12}5$ when $G$ is planar with girth at least
$12$.  Restriction to planar graphs permits a stronger result: Prove that
planar graphs with girth at least $11$ have adjacent $2$-vertices, and provide
a construction to show that the conclusion fails for some planar graph with
girth $10$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{edgir7}
Use balanced charging to prove that every planar graph with girth at least $7$
and minimum degree at least $2$ has a $2$-vertex adjacent to a $3^-$-vertex.
Prove that the conclusion does not always hold when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{14}5$ (thus
planarity is needed).  Show that the conclusion does not hold for all planar
graphs with girth $6$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
Planar graphs with girth at least $6$ satisfy ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3$, so by
Exercise~\ref{25min} each such graph has a $2$-vertex with a $5^-$-neighbor.
Show that this is sharp even for planar graphs by constructing a planar graph
with girth $6$ having no edge of weight at most $6$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{edgirn}
Determine whether a planar graph with girth at least $4$ and minimum degree
$3$ must have a $3$-vertex with a $4^-$-neighbor.  Construct a planar graph
$G_k$ with girth $4$ and minimum degree $3$ in which the distance between
$3$-vertices is at least $k$.  Construct a planar graph $H_k$ with minimum
degree $5$ in which the distance between $5$-vertices is at least $k$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
Let $G$ be a graph with $\delta(G)\ge3$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{10}3$.  Prove that
$G$ has a $3$-vertex whose neighbors have degree-sum at most $10$.  Prove that
this result is sharp even in the family of planar graphs with girth at least
$5$ by constructing such a graph in which no $3$-vertex has three $3$-neighbors.
(Comment: G. Tardos constructed such a graph with $98$ vertices.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{exfirst}
(Borodin~\cite{B1996e})
Prove that every planar graph with minimum degree $5$ contains two $3$-faces
sharing an edge with weight at most $11$.  Show that this configuration is
reducible for $\chi'''(G)\le 12$.  (Hint: Use vertex charging, with
$5$-vertices taking $\FR12$ from incident $4^+$-faces and the remaining
needed charge from $7^+$-neighbors.  Comments: Borodin proved a stronger
structural conclusion and used it in his proof that $\chi'''(G)\le\Delta(G)+4$
when $\Delta(G)\ge7$; the proof of the statement here is simpler.  Note also
the similarity between the configurations here and in Exercise~\ref{albertson}).
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{entire}
(Cranston)
Give a short proof that $\chi'''(G)\le\Delta(G)+4$ when $G$ is a planar graph
with $\Delta(G)\ge7$ by using the technique in the proof of Theorem~\ref{total},
relying on Theorem~\ref{6CT} instead of the Four Color Theorem.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{planarb}
Prove inductively that every planar graph decomposes into three forests.
(Hint: Reduce to triangulations, and then apply the induction hypothesis
to a smaller graph obtained by deleting a light vertex and triangulating
the resulting face.  There are a number of cases when the deleted vertex has
degree $5$, depending on the usage of the two added edges.)  Use
Lemma~\ref{12vert} and more detailed analysis to prove that the third
forests can be guaranteed to have maximum degree at most $9$.  (Comment:
The second part of this exercise is long.  See Balogh et al.~\cite{BKPY} for
maximum degree at most $8$.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{4dynam}
(Kim and Park~\cite{KP})
Prove that among the planar graphs with girth at least $7$, a minimal graph
that is not dynamically $4$-choosable cannot contain a $2$-vertex with a
$3^-$-neighbor.  (Comment: With Lemma~\ref{girth7}, this proves that every
planar graph with girth at least $7$ is dynamically $4$-choosable.  Note that
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{14}5$ when $G$ is planar with girth at least $7$, but
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{14}5$ is not sufficient for dynamic $4$-choosability.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{D+25}
van den Heuvel and McGuinness~\cite{HM} refined Lemma~\ref{12vert} to state
that a planar graph $G$ with $\delta(G)\ge3$ has a $5^-$-vertex $v$ with at
most two $12^+$-neighbors such that $v$ has a $7^-$-neighbor if
$d(v)\in\{4,5\}$, and $v$ has an additional $6^-$-neighbor if $d(v)=5$
(see Exercise~\ref{HMex}).
Use this to prove that $\chi(G^2)\le 2\Delta(G)+25$ when $\Delta(G)\ge12$.
\end{exercise}

}

\section{Stronger and Weaker Colorings}\label{secrestrict}\label{secrelax}

In this section, we consider both restricted and relaxed versions of proper
coloring.  As a relaxation, we study ``improper'' coloring, where the subgraph
induced by a color class has maximum degree at most $d$; proper coloring is the
case $d=0$.  First we study restricted versions of coloring.  For example, the
union of two color classes in a proper coloring induces a bipartite graph; we
may further restrict the bipartite graphs allowed to arise.

\subsection{Acyclic Coloring}
An {\it acyclic coloring} of a graph $G$ is a proper coloring in which the
union of any two color classes induces a forest.  Equivalently, no cycle is
$2$-colored.  Let $a(G)$ denote the minimum number of colors in an acyclic
coloring of $G$.

Gr\"unbaum~\cite{Gru} conjectured that planar graphs are acyclically
$5$-colorable, observed that the graph of the octahedron is not acyclically
$4$-colorable, and proved that planar graphs are acyclically $9$-colorable.
Improved upper bounds of $8$~\cite{Mi}, $7$~\cite{AB}, and $6$~\cite{Kos}
culminated in the result of Borodin~\cite{Bacy} that $a(G)\le 5$ when $G$
is planar.  The bound is sharp, even among bipartite planar graphs~\cite{KMe}
(Exercise~\ref{noac4}).  Borodin's proof used discharging with some $450$
reducible configurations but no computers.

We present the earlier result by Albertson and Berman~\cite{AB} that planar
graphs are acyclically $7$-colorable; it has several interesting features.
In the discharging, the strictly negative charge from Euler's Formula
is used to keep the forced configurations away from the unbounded face.
In the reducibility, the smaller graphs used in coloring $G$ are modifications
of subgraphs of $G$.  Our proof simplifies some aspects of the original proof.

A {\it near-triangulation} is a plane graph in which every bounded face is a
triangle.  A vertex not incident to the unbounded face is an
{\it internal vertex}.  Our modification of Lemma~\ref{kotzig} is closely
tailored to the reducibility arguments in Theorem~\ref{acy7}.

\begin{lemma}\label{kotzplus}
Let $G$ be a near-triangulation with $\delta(G)\ge3$.  If the outer face has
length $4$ and $G$ has at least two internal vertices, then $G$ contains an
internal $3$-vertex, or an internal $4$-vertex or $5$-vertex with an internal
$6^-$-neighbor, or an internal $7$-vertex with two internal $4$-neighbors.
If the outer face has length $3$, then again $G$ contains one of these
configurations, but without the restriction to internal vertices.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
For triangulations, consider the proof of Lemma~\ref{kotzig}.  If we change
the forbidden configuration at a $7$-vertex to require two $4$-neighbors (so
$7$-vertices with one $4$-neighbor are allowed), then a $7$-vertex still ends
with positive charge, since a $4$-neighbor and two $5$-neighbors together take
only $\FR9{10}$ from it.  This proves the statement for triangulations here.

Now let the outer face have length $4$, and again give initial charges by
vertex charging.  The bounded faces have charge $0$, and the unbounded face
has charge $2$.  Hence the vertex charges sum to $-14$.  We move charge so that
if none of the specified configurations occur, then every internal vertex has
nonnegative charge and the sum of the charges of the external vertices is
greater than $-14$, yielding a contradiction.  We use the same discharging rule
as in Lemma~\ref{kotzig}, except that external vertices do not receive charge.

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Every internal $5^-$-vertex $v$ takes charge $\frac{6-d(v)}{d(v)}$ from each
neighbor.

\medskip
With the specified configurations forbidden, the discharging rule insures that
all internal $6^-$-vertices end happy.  By the same argument as for
triangulations, an internal $7$-vertex ends happy.  As in Lemma~\ref{kotzig},
an internal $k$-vertex with $k\ge8$ may have internal $4$-neighbors, losing
charge at most $\frac 24$ to at most $\FL{\frac k2}$ neighbors, retaining
nonnegative charge.

Now consider the external vertices.  A $3$-vertex on the outside face has only
one internal neighbor, to which it loses at most $\frac 12$ since internal
$3$-vertices are forbidden.  Since external vertices do not receive charge,
an external $k$-vertex loses charge at most $\frac 12$ to each of at most
$\CL{\frac{k-2}2}$ neighbors.  The final charge is at least
$(k-6)-\FR12\CL{\frac{k-2}2}$, which for $k\ge4$ is at least $-2.5$.
Thus every external vertex ends with charge at least $-3.5$, with equality
possible only for $3$-vertices.  However, if all four external vertices are
$3$-vertices, then $G$ has only one internal vertex, contradicting the
hypothesis.  We conclude that the sum of the charges on the external vertices
is strictly more than $-14$.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}[\cite{AB}]\label{acy7}
Every planar graph is acyclically $7$-colorable.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
It suffices to show that $G$ is acyclically $7$-colorable when $G$ is a simple
triangulation.  This is trivial for $|V(G)|\le7$.  Let $G$ be a simple
triangulation having the fewest vertices among those that are not acyclically
$7$-colorable.  Triangulations with at least four vertices have minimum degree
at least $3$.  The neighbors of any internal vertex induce a cycle.  For
$e\in E(G)$, let $T(e)$ denote the set of two vertices forming $3$-faces with
the endpoints of $e$.

{\it Case 1: $G$ has a $3$-vertex $v$.}
By minimality, $G-v$ has an acyclic $7$-coloring.  The colors it uses on
$N_G(v)$ are distinct.  Replace $v$ and give it any color not used on its
neighbors.  Any cycle through $v$ has at least three colors, as does any cycle
in $G-v$.

{\it Case 2: $G$ has a $4$-vertex $v$ with a $6^-$-neighbor $u$.}
See Figure~\ref{figacy7}.
Let $\{x,y\}=T(uv)$ and $\{z\}=N_G(v)-N_G(u)$.  Let $G'=(G-v)+xy$.
Since $G'$ has fewer vertices, it has an acyclic $7$-coloring $\phi$.
Let $S=\{\phi(u),\phi(x),\phi(y),\phi(z)\}$.
If $|S|=4$, then give $v$ any color outside $S$ to extend $\phi$ to $G$.
If $|S|=3$, then $\phi(z)=\phi(u)$.  Since $d_G(u)\le6$, at most three colors
outside $S$ have been used on $N_{G'}(u)$.  Hence a color outside
$S\cup \phi(N_{G'}(u))$ remains available to extend $\phi$ to $G$.  Again this
produces no $2$-colored cycle through $v$, since such a cycle would have to
visit $z$ and $u$ and use a color in $N_{G'}(u)$.

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.632in
    \rlap{\kern 1.236in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.146in
    \rlap{\kern 1.517in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.632in
    \rlap{\kern 1.798in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.119in
    \rlap{\kern 1.517in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.119in
    \rlap{\kern 0.955in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.632in
    \rlap{\kern 0.674in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.146in
    \rlap{\kern 0.955in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.632in
    \rlap{\kern 0.112in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 1236 632}%
    \special{pa 1517 146}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1236 632}%
    \special{pa 1798 632}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1236 632}%
    \special{pa 1517 1119}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1236 632}%
    \special{pa 955 1119}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1236 632}%
    \special{pa 112 632}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1236 632}%
    \special{pa 955 146}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 955 146}%
    \special{pa 674 632}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 674 632}%
    \special{pa 955 1119}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 955 1119}%
    \special{pa 112 632}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 112 632}%
    \special{pa 955 146}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 955 1119}%
    \special{pa 955 146}%
    \special{da 0.056}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.231in
    \rlap{\kern 1.011in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $y$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.033in
    \rlap{\kern 0.955in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.520in
    \rlap{\kern 1.236in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.553in
    \rlap{\kern 0.595in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.632in
    \rlap{\kern 0.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.070in
    \rlap{\kern 3.764in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.281in
    \rlap{\kern 4.203in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.757in
    \rlap{\kern 4.312in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.138in
    \rlap{\kern 4.008in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.138in
    \rlap{\kern 3.520in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.757in
    \rlap{\kern 3.216in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.281in
    \rlap{\kern 3.325in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.632in
    \rlap{\kern 4.888in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.632in
    \rlap{\kern 2.640in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 3764 632}%
    \special{pa 3764 70}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3764 632}%
    \special{pa 4203 281}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3764 632}%
    \special{pa 4312 757}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3764 632}%
    \special{pa 4008 1138}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3764 632}%
    \special{pa 3520 1138}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3764 632}%
    \special{pa 3216 757}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3764 632}%
    \special{pa 3325 281}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4203 281}%
    \special{pa 4312 757}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4312 757}%
    \special{pa 4008 1138}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4008 1138}%
    \special{pa 4888 632}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4888 632}%
    \special{pa 4203 281}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3520 1138}%
    \special{pa 3216 757}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3216 757}%
    \special{pa 3325 281}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3325 281}%
    \special{pa 2640 632}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2640 632}%
    \special{pa 3520 1138}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 4203 281}%
    \special{pa 4008 1138}%
    \special{da 0.056}%
    \special{pa 3520 1138}%
    \special{pa 3325 281}%
    \special{da 0.056}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 4312 757}%
    \special{pa 4888 632}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3216 757}%
    \special{pa 2640 632}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.836in
    \rlap{\kern 4.363in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $y$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.744in
    \rlap{\kern 3.764in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.836in
    \rlap{\kern 3.137in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.202in
    \rlap{\kern 4.338in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $y'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.218in
    \rlap{\kern 4.088in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $y''$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.632in
    \rlap{\kern 5.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\hat y$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.202in
    \rlap{\kern 3.246in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.218in
    \rlap{\kern 3.599in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x''$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.632in
    \rlap{\kern 2.528in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\hat x$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.251in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 5.000in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-.7pc}

\caption{Cases 2 and 3 of Theorem~\ref{acy7}\label{figacy7}}
\end{figure}

{\it Case 3: $G$ has a $7$-vertex $v$ with two $4$-neighbors $x$ and $y$.}
See Figure~\ref{figacy7}.
With Case 2 forbidden, we may assume that $x$ and $y$ are not consecutive
neighbors of $v$.  Let $\{x',x''\}=T(xv)$ and $\{y',y''\}=T(yv)$.  Let
$G'=G-\{x,y\}+\{x'x'',y'y''\}$; we have deleted two vertices and inserted two
edges so that $G'$ is a smaller triangulation (the size of $\{x',x'',y',y''\}$
may be $3$ or $4$).  By minimality, $G'$ has an acyclic $7$-coloring.  Let
$\hat x$ and $\hat y$ be the remaining neighbors in $G$ of $x$ and $y$,
respectively.

On each of $N_G(x)$ and $N_G(y)$, the number of colors used by $\phi$ is
$3$ or $4$ (like $S$ in Case 2).  If both sets have size $4$, then give each
of $x$ and $y$ any color not used by $\phi$ on its neighbors in $G$; this
prevents $2$-colored cycles through $x$ and $y$.

If exactly one of these two sets has size $3$, then we may assume that $\phi$
uses three colors on $N_G(x)$.  Now $\phi(v)=\phi(\hat x)$.  Since $x$ and $y$
are not yet colored, $\phi$ uses at most six colors on $N_G(v)\cup\{v\}$.
Choose a color outside this set for $x$, and choose a color for $y$
outside the set of four colors used by $\phi$ on $N_G(y)$.  This prevents
$2$-colored cycles through $x$ and $y$.

Hence we may assume that $\phi(v)=\phi(\hat x)=\phi(\hat y)$.  Now let $S$ be
the set of colors used by $\phi$ on the six vertices of $N_G(v)\cup\{v\}$
already colored.  If $|S|\le 5$, then two distinct colors outside $S$ can be
used on $x$ and $y$.  If $|S|=6$, then recolor $v$ to the color outside $S$;
still there are no $2$-colored cycles through $v$.  Now $N_G(x)$ and $N_G(y)$
are each colored with four distinct colors, so $\phi$ can be extended to $x$
and $y$ to complete an acyclic $7$-coloring of $G$.

{\it Case 4: The configurations in Cases 1--3 do not occur.}
If $G$ has a $4$-cycle enclosing more than one vertex, then let $C$ be such
a $4$-cycle enclosing the fewest vertices; otherwise $C$ is the external
$3$-cycle.  Let $H$ be the subgraph consisting of $C$ and everything enclosed
by $C$.

By Lemma~\ref{kotzplus} and the exclusion of Cases 1--3, $H$ has an internal
$5$-vertex $v$ with an internal neighbor $u$ having degree $5$ or $6$.  Let
$\{x,y\}=T(uv)$.  Form $G'$ from $G$ by contracting $vx$ and $vy$, letting $z$
be the combined vertex.  By the minimality of $G$, there is an acyclic
$7$-coloring $\phi$ of $G'$.  Use the same coloring on $G$, with $x$ and $y$
receiving color $\phi(z)$.  With $v$ not yet colored, there are no
improperly colored edges or $2$-colored cycles.  See Figure~\ref{figacy7a}.

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.096in
    \rlap{\kern 0.076in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.400in
    \rlap{\kern 0.685in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.096in
    \rlap{\kern 1.293in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.791in
    \rlap{\kern 0.989in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.791in
    \rlap{\kern 0.380in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.487in
    \rlap{\kern 0.076in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.183in
    \rlap{\kern 0.685in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.487in
    \rlap{\kern 1.293in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 76 1096}%
    \special{pa 685 1400}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 685 1400}%
    \special{pa 1293 1096}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1293 1096}%
    \special{pa 989 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 989 791}%
    \special{pa 380 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 380 791}%
    \special{pa 76 1096}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 989 791}%
    \special{pa 380 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 380 791}%
    \special{pa 76 487}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 76 487}%
    \special{pa 685 183}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 685 183}%
    \special{pa 1293 487}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1293 487}%
    \special{pa 989 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 685 1400}%
    \special{pa 989 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 989 791}%
    \special{pa 685 183}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 685 183}%
    \special{pa 380 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 380 791}%
    \special{pa 685 1400}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 76 1096}%
    \special{pa 76 487}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1293 1096}%
    \special{pa 1293 487}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 685 1400}%
    \special{pa 685 1583}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 685 183}%
    \special{pa 685 0}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 685 183}%
    \special{pa 502 548}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 584 453}%
    \special{pa 502 548}%
    \special{pa 529 425}%
    \special{pa 584 453}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 502 548}%
    \special{pa 380 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 685 1400}%
    \special{pa 502 1035}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 529 1157}%
    \special{pa 502 1035}%
    \special{pa 584 1130}%
    \special{pa 529 1157}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 502 1035}%
    \special{pa 380 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.486in
    \rlap{\kern 0.771in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $y$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.791in
    \rlap{\kern 1.111in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.791in
    \rlap{\kern 0.259in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.096in
    \rlap{\kern 2.207in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.791in
    \rlap{\kern 2.511in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.096in
    \rlap{\kern 3.424in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.791in
    \rlap{\kern 3.120in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.487in
    \rlap{\kern 3.424in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.487in
    \rlap{\kern 2.207in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2207 1096}%
    \special{pa 2511 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2511 791}%
    \special{pa 3424 1096}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3424 1096}%
    \special{pa 3424 487}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3424 487}%
    \special{pa 2511 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2511 791}%
    \special{pa 2207 487}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2207 487}%
    \special{pa 2207 1096}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3120 791}%
    \special{pa 2511 791}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3120 791}%
    \special{pa 3424 1096}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3120 791}%
    \special{pa 3424 487}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2511 974}%
    \special{pa 2511 609}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.097in
    \rlap{\kern 0.771in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.791in
    \rlap{\kern 2.389in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.791in
    \rlap{\kern 3.241in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.583in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 3.500in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-.7pc}

\caption{Case 4 of Theorem~\ref{acy7}\label{figacy7a}}
\end{figure}

Let $S$ be the set of colors used on $N_G(v)$.  If $|S|=4$, then give $v$ a
color outside $S$.  If $|S|=3$ (so $\phi(u)$ appears on another neighbor of
$v$), then give $v$ a color not in $S$ and not on any neighbor of $u$.  Such
a color exists, since $d(u)\le 6$.  Now $G$ is properly colored, and any
$2$-colored cycle $C'$ through $v$ must also visit $x$ and $y$.  If $C'$ has
length more than $4$, then it contracts to a $2$-colored cycle in $G'$, which
contradicts $\phi$ being an acyclic coloring of $G'$.

\nobreak
Finally, suppose that $C'$ has length $4$.  Note that $C'$ encloses either
$N(v)-\{u,x,y\}$ or the vertex $u$ and at least one neighbor of $u$; in each
case at least two vertices.  If $x$ and $y$ are not both on $C$, then $C'$
is enclosed by $C$ and contradicts the choice of $C$.  If $x$ and $y$ are both
on $C$, then the fourth vertex of $C'$ may be outside $H$, but in this case the
path $\langle x,v,y\rangle$ combines with one of the two other vertices of $C$ to
again contradict the choice of $C$.
\end{proof}

As in Theorem~\ref{sqdelta}, the use of contraction in the proof means that the
proof does not provide a bound for the list version; the same holds for
Borodin's proof of $a(G)\le5$.  Nevertheless, Borodin et al.~\cite{BFKRS}
conjectured that $a_\ell(G)\le 5$ for every planar graph $G$, where $a_\ell(G)$
is the least $k$ such that for every $k$-uniform list assignment $L$, there is
an acyclic $L$-coloring of $G$.  They proved (via discharging) that
$a_\ell(G)\le7$ for planar graphs.  The conjecture would strengthen both the
result of Borodin~\cite{Bacy} that $a(G)\le5$ when $G$ is planar and the
result of Thomassen~\cite{T94} that $\chi_\ell(G)\le5$ when $G$ is planar.

Toward the conjecture, Borodin and Ivanova~\cite{BI4} proved $a_\ell(G)\le 5$
for planar graphs with no $4$-cycles, improving~\cite{CR12,CW,MRW07,WC2,WZC}
(most forbidding $4$-cycles and something else.  In~\cite{BI3}, only special
$4$-cycles are forbidden.  Montassier, Raspaud, and Wang~\cite{MRW06}
conjectured that $a_\ell(G)\le4$ when $G$ is planar with no $4$-cycles and
proved this in some cases; $a_\ell(G)\le4$ holds when both $4$-cycles and
$5$-cycles are forbidden~\cite{BI5,CR13}.

As in ordinary coloring, larger girth for planar graphs (or smaller ${\rm{mad}}(G)$)
makes acyclic coloring easier.  Montassier~\cite{Mon} and Borodin et
al.~\cite{BCIR} proved $a_\ell(G)\le4$ and $a_\ell(G)\le3$ for planar graphs
with girth at least $5$ and at least $7$, respectively,
improving~\cite{BIR,BKW99,CR10,CRRZ,MOR}.
Weaker results are fairly easy to prove.  When $G$ is planar with girth at
least $7$ (Exercise~\ref{edgir7}) or when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR83$
(Exercise~\ref{dynamick}), $G$ contains a $1^-$-vertex or a $2$-vertex with a
$3^-$-neighbor.  These configurations are reducible for $a_\ell(G)\le 4$
(Exercise~\ref{acyc4}), so graphs in these families are acyclically
$4$-choosable.  For planar graphs with girth at least $5$, we prove a structure
theorem that yields $a_\ell(G)\le 6$; it has further applications in this
section.

\begin{lemma}[Cranston--Yu~\cite{CY}]\label{gir5dis}
If $G$ is a planar graph with girth at least $5$ and $\delta(G)\ge2$, then $G$
has a $2$-vertex with a $5^-$-neighbor or a $5$-face whose incident vertices
are four $3$-vertices and a $5^-$-vertex.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
(sketch)
Let $G$ be such a graph containing none of the specified configurations.
Assign charges by balanced charging; discharging will make all vertices and
faces happy when the specified configurations do not occur.

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Each $3^-$-vertex $v$ takes $\frac{4-d(v)}{d(v)}$ from each incident face.

\noindent
(R2) Each $6^+$-vertex $v$ gives $\frac{d(v)-4}{d(v)}$ to each incident face.

\medskip
The rules immediately make each vertex happy ($5$-vertices end positive),
and it remains only to check that each face ends happy.  The configurations in
Figure~\ref{figgir5} show faces that end with charge $0$; Exercise~\ref{gir5}
requests the verification that other faces end happy.
\end{proof}

\begin{figure}[hbt]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.096in
    \rlap{\kern 0.530in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.346in
    \rlap{\kern 0.674in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.597in
    \rlap{\kern 0.530in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.597in
    \rlap{\kern 0.241in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.346in
    \rlap{\kern 0.096in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.096in
    \rlap{\kern 0.241in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 530 96}%
    \special{pa 674 346}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 674 346}%
    \special{pa 530 597}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 530 597}%
    \special{pa 241 597}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 241 597}%
    \special{pa 96 346}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 96 346}%
    \special{pa 241 96}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 241 96}%
    \special{pa 530 96}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.028in
    \rlap{\kern 0.598in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.346in
    \rlap{\kern 0.770in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.665in
    \rlap{\kern 0.598in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.665in
    \rlap{\kern 0.173in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.346in
    \rlap{\kern 0.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.028in
    \rlap{\kern 0.173in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.096in
    \rlap{\kern 1.541in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.346in
    \rlap{\kern 1.685in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.597in
    \rlap{\kern 1.541in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.597in
    \rlap{\kern 1.252in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.346in
    \rlap{\kern 1.107in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.096in
    \rlap{\kern 1.252in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1541 96}%
    \special{pa 1685 346}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1685 346}%
    \special{pa 1541 597}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1541 597}%
    \special{pa 1252 597}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1252 597}%
    \special{pa 1107 346}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1107 346}%
    \special{pa 1252 96}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1252 96}%
    \special{pa 1541 96}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.028in
    \rlap{\kern 1.609in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.346in
    \rlap{\kern 1.781in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.665in
    \rlap{\kern 1.609in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.665in
    \rlap{\kern 1.184in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.346in
    \rlap{\kern 1.011in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.028in
    \rlap{\kern 1.184in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.106in
    \rlap{\kern 2.407in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 2.682in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.628in
    \rlap{\kern 2.577in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.628in
    \rlap{\kern 2.237in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 2.132in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2407 106}%
    \special{pa 2682 305}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2682 305}%
    \special{pa 2577 628}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2577 628}%
    \special{pa 2237 628}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2237 628}%
    \special{pa 2132 305}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2132 305}%
    \special{pa 2407 106}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.009in
    \rlap{\kern 2.407in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 2.778in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.696in
    \rlap{\kern 2.645in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.696in
    \rlap{\kern 2.169in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 2.036in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.106in
    \rlap{\kern 3.418in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 3.693in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.628in
    \rlap{\kern 3.588in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.628in
    \rlap{\kern 3.248in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 3.143in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 3418 106}%
    \special{pa 3693 305}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3693 305}%
    \special{pa 3588 628}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3588 628}%
    \special{pa 3248 628}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3248 628}%
    \special{pa 3143 305}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3143 305}%
    \special{pa 3418 106}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.009in
    \rlap{\kern 3.418in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 3.789in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.696in
    \rlap{\kern 3.656in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.696in
    \rlap{\kern 3.180in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 3\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 3.047in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.106in
    \rlap{\kern 4.429in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 4.704in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.628in
    \rlap{\kern 4.599in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.628in
    \rlap{\kern 4.259in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 4.154in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 4429 106}%
    \special{pa 4704 305}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4704 305}%
    \special{pa 4599 628}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4599 628}%
    \special{pa 4259 628}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4259 628}%
    \special{pa 4154 305}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4154 305}%
    \special{pa 4429 106}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.009in
    \rlap{\kern 4.429in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 4.800in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.696in
    \rlap{\kern 4.667in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.696in
    \rlap{\kern 4.191in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 6\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.305in
    \rlap{\kern 4.058in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss 2\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.725in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 4.800in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Sharp configurations for Lemma~\ref{gir5dis}\label{figgir5}}
\end{figure}

Planar graphs with girth at least $6$ satisfy ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3$, and this is
sufficient for acyclic $6$-choosability.  To strengthen the result on planar
graphs, we must work harder.

\begin{theorem}\label{acyclic6}
If $G$ is a planar graph with girth at least $5$, or if ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3$,
then $a_\ell(G)\le6$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Since a $1^-$-vertex lies in no cycle, its color need only avoid that of its
(possible) neighbor.  Hence a $1^-$-vertex is reducible for $a_\ell(G)\le6$,
and we may assume $\delta(G)\ge2$.

Since ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3$ and $\delta(G)\ge2$ guarantees a $2$-vertex with a
$5^-$-neighbor (Exercise~\ref{25min}), it suffices to show that the
configurations in Lemma~\ref{gir5dis} are reducible for $a_\ell(G)\le6$.
Let $L$ be a $6$-uniform list assignment for $G$.

First consider a $2$-vertex $v$ with a $5^-$-neighbor $u$.  Let $\phi$ be an
acyclic $L$-coloring of $G-v$.  If the colors on $N_G(v)$ are distinct, then
color $v$ with a color in $L(v)$ other than those.  If the colors on $N(v)$ are
equal, then color $v$ with a color not used on $N_G(v)\cup N_{G-v}(u)$.  Since
$|N_{G-v}(u)|\le4$, this forbids at most five colors, and a color remains
available in $L(v)$.  Now there are no $2$-colored cycles in $G-v$ and none
through $v$.

For the remaining configuration, let $v_1,v_2,v_3,v_4,w$ be the vertices on a
$5$-face, with each $v_i$ of degree $3$ and $d(w)\le5$.  Let $x_i$ be the
neighbor of $v_i$ outside the $5$-cycle (see Figure~\ref{figacy6}).

\begin{figure}[hbt]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.678in
    \rlap{\kern 0.210in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.678in
    \rlap{\kern 0.631in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.678in
    \rlap{\kern 1.051in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 210 678}%
    \special{pa 1051 678}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.552in
    \rlap{\kern 0.631in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.552in
    \rlap{\kern 0.967in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1051 678}%
    \special{pa 1135 468}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1051 678}%
    \special{pa 1219 594}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1051 678}%
    \special{pa 1219 762}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1051 678}%
    \special{pa 1135 888}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 210 678}%
    \special{pa 126 468}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 210 678}%
    \special{pa 42 594}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 210 678}%
    \special{pa 0 678}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 210 678}%
    \special{pa 42 762}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 210 678}%
    \special{pa 126 888}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.678in
    \rlap{\kern 0.631in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\marker$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.099in
    \rlap{\kern 2.732in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.808in
    \rlap{\kern 2.332in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.338in
    \rlap{\kern 2.485in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.338in
    \rlap{\kern 2.979in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.808in
    \rlap{\kern 3.132in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2732 1099}%
    \special{pa 2332 808}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2332 808}%
    \special{pa 2485 338}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2485 338}%
    \special{pa 2979 338}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2979 338}%
    \special{pa 3132 808}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3132 808}%
    \special{pa 2732 1099}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.972in
    \rlap{\kern 2.732in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $w$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.766in
    \rlap{\kern 2.459in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v_1$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.457in
    \rlap{\kern 2.604in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v_2$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.457in
    \rlap{\kern 2.861in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v_3$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.766in
    \rlap{\kern 3.006in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v_4$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.338in
    \rlap{\kern 2.485in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\marker$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.338in
    \rlap{\kern 2.979in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\marker$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.309in
    \rlap{\kern 2.732in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.873in
    \rlap{\kern 2.133in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.168in
    \rlap{\kern 2.361in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.168in
    \rlap{\kern 3.103in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.873in
    \rlap{\kern 3.332in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2332 808}%
    \special{pa 2133 873}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2485 338}%
    \special{pa 2361 168}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2979 338}%
    \special{pa 3103 168}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3132 808}%
    \special{pa 3332 873}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2732 1099}%
    \special{pa 2732 1309}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2732 1099}%
    \special{pa 2606 1309}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2732 1099}%
    \special{pa 2858 1309}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.309in
    \rlap{\kern 2.606in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.309in
    \rlap{\kern 2.858in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.873in
    \rlap{\kern 1.964in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x_1$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.049in
    \rlap{\kern 2.243in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x_2$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.049in
    \rlap{\kern 3.222in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x_3$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.873in
    \rlap{\kern 3.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x_4$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.414in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 3.500in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-1pc}

\caption{Reducible configurations for Theorem~\ref{acyclic6}\label{figacy6}}
\end{figure}

Let $\phi$ be an acyclic $L$-coloring of $G-\{v_2,v_3\}$.  We consider three
cases, depending on whether $\phi$ uses one color or two colors on $N_G(v_2)$
and on $N_G(v_3)$.
(a)  If $\phi(v_1) \ne \phi(x_2)$ and $\phi(v_4) \ne \phi(x_3)$, then choose
$\phi(v_2)$ and $\phi(v_3)$ distinct and outside
$\{\phi(v_1), \phi(x_2), \phi(x_3), \phi(v_4)\}$.
(b) If $\phi(v_1) = \phi(x_2)$ but $\phi(v_4) \ne \phi(x_3)$, then choose
$\phi(v_2) \notin \{\phi(w), \phi(x_1), \phi(x_2)\}$ and
$\phi(v_3)\!\notin\!\{\phi(v_4), \phi(x_3), \phi(v_2), \phi(v_1)\}$.
(c) If $\phi(v_1)\!=\!\phi(x_2)$ and $\phi(v_4) = \phi(x_3)$, then choose
$\phi(v_2) \notin \{\phi(w), \phi(v_1), \phi(x_1), \phi(v_4)\}$ and
$\phi(v_3) \notin \{\phi(v_2), \phi(v_4), \phi(w), \phi(x_4)\}$.  In each
case, the coloring is proper, and the new vertices lie in no $2$-colored cycle.
\end{proof}

For general graphs, let $f(k)=\max\{a(G)\colon\,\Delta(G)=k\}$.
Gr\"unbaum~\cite{Gru} proved $f(k)\le k^2$ and $f(3)\le 4$ (see also~\cite{Sku})
and asked whether $f(k)=k+1$ in general.  Bur\v{s}te\u{\i}n~\cite{Bu} and
Kostochka~\cite{K1978} independently proved $f(4)=5$.  For $f(5)$, the best
result is $f(5)\le7$ (Kostochka--Stocker~\cite{KS}, improving~\cite{FR2}
and~\cite{YVKV}), but it is not known to be sharp.  In general, the answer to
Gr\"unbaum's question is ``no''; Alon, McDiarmid, and Reed~\cite{AMR} showed by
probabilistic methods that
$\Omega(\frac{k^{4/3}}{(\log k)^{1/3}})\le f(k)\le 50k^{4/3}$.  Kostochka and
Stocker~\cite{KS} gave a short constructive proof of
$f(k)\le1+\FL{\FR14(k+1)^2}$, improving~\cite{FR1}.

Without restriction to planar graphs, Borodin, Chen, Ivanova, and
Raspaud~\cite{BCIR} proved $a_\ell(G)\le 3$ when $G$ has girth at least $7$ and
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{14}5$.  In general, when ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ is smaller than $\Delta(G)$,
the bound on $a(G)$ in terms of $\Delta(G)$ can be improved.  For example,
Fiedorowicz~\cite{Fie2} proved that $a(G)\le6$ when $\Delta(G)\le 5$ and
${\rm{mad}}(G)<4$.

Although $a(G)$ is bounded in terms of $\Delta(G)$, it is not bounded in
terms of $\chi(G)$, since $a(K_{n,n})=n+1$.  On the other hand, there is
such a bound for line graphs.  Let $a'(G)$ be the minimum number of colors
in an acyclic edge-coloring of $G$, which is just an acyclic coloring of $L(G)$.
Esperet and Parreau~\cite{EPa} proved $a'(G)\le 4\Delta(G)-4$,
improving~\cite{MR}, which improved~\cite{AMR}.  Girth restrictions permit
smaller coefficients (see~\cite{EPa}, improving~\cite{MNS,NPS}).  A stronger
bound is conjectured.

\begin{conjecture}[Fiam\v{c}ik~\cite{Fi}; see also~\cite{ASZ}]\label{Fiam}
Always $a'(G)\le\Delta(G)+2$.
\end{conjecture}

Alon, Sudakov, and Zaks~\cite{ASZ} proved the existence of a constant $c$ such
that girth at least $c\Delta(G)\log\Delta(G)$ guarantees
$a'(G)\le\Delta(G)+2$.  Stiebitz et al.~\cite[p.~263]{SSTF} suggested that
always $a'(G)\le\Delta(G)+1$, which holds for random regular
graphs~\cite{NW}.  Of course, $\Delta(G)$ is a lower bound.  For planar graphs,
there is an analogue of Vizing's Planar Graph Conjecture:

\begin{conjecture}[Cohen, Havet, and M\"uller~\cite{CHM}]\label{chm}
There is a positive integer $k$ such that if $G$ is a planar graph with
$\Delta(G)\ge k$, then $a'(G)=\Delta(G)$.
\end{conjecture}

The existence of such $k$ was proved in~\cite{CHM} for the family of planar
graphs with ${\rm{mad}}(G)\le4-\epsilon$, for any fixed $\epsilon$.  When
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{10}3$, Basavaraju et al.~\cite{BCCHM} proved that $\Delta(G)\ge19$
suffices.  Several papers have provided pairs $(k,g)$ such that
$a'(G)=\Delta(G)$ for all planar graphs with $\Delta(G)\ge k$ and
girth at least $g$.

Lemma~\ref{12vert} easily yields $a'(G)\le2\Delta(G)+33$ when $G$ is planar
(Exercise~\ref{aeplanar}).  Wang et al.~\cite{WSW} proved that $\Delta(G)+7$
colors suffice for planar graphs, improving upper bounds of
$2\Delta(G)+29$~\cite{FHN}, $\max\{2\Delta(G)-2,\Delta(G)+22\}$~\cite{HWLL},
$\Delta(G)+25$~\cite{CHM}, $\Delta(G)+12$~\cite{BCCHM}, and
$\Delta(G)+10$~\cite{GHY}.  The bound improves to $\Delta(G)+3$ for girth
at least $4$~\cite{BC12b} (improving~\cite{FHN}), to $\Delta(G)+2$ for girth at
least $5$~\cite{BF,HWLL}, and to $\Delta(G)+1$ for girth at least
$6$~\cite{BF,YHLLX} or for girth $5$ when $\Delta(G)\ge11$~\cite{YHLLX}).

Bounds on $a'(G)$ have been given for planar graphs under various
sets of forbidden cycle lengths; one goal is to prove Conjecture~\ref{Fiam}
under the weakest possible restrictions.  For example,
$a'(G)\le\Delta(G)+2$ for planar graphs with no $5$-cycles~\cite{SWW}, with
no $4$-cycles~\cite{WSWco}, and with no $3$-cycles~\cite{SWW+}; furthermore,
the bound still holds when no $3$-cycle is adjacent to a
$4$-cycle~\cite{WSWdam} and when no $3$-cycle is adjacent to a
$6$-cycle~\cite{WSWetal}.

Beyond planar graphs, Fiedorowicz~\cite{Fie1} proved for integer $t$ that
$a'(G)\le(t-1)\Delta(G)+2t^3-3t+2$ when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<2t$.
In terms of the
maximum degree only, $a'(G)\le4$ when $\Delta(G)=3$ except for $K_4$ and
$K_{3,3}$ (in \cite{BC08} for $\delta(G)<3$ and in~\cite{AMM} for $3$-regular
graphs, improving~\cite{Sku}).  If $\Delta(G)\le4$, then $a'(G)\le6$
(\cite{BC09} for $\delta(G)<4$ and~\cite{WSW+} for $4$-regular.  Also,
$a'(G)=\Delta(G)$ when $G$ is obtained from any other graph by subdividing
each edge~\cite{FH}.

Finally, Lai and Lih~\cite{LL13} extended many of these results to the acyclic
edge-choosability $a_\ell'(G)$, which is the minimum $k$ such that an acyclic
edge-coloring can be chosen from any $k$-uniform assignment on the edges.
For example, $a_\ell'(G)\le\Delta(G)+1$ for outerplanar graphs and for
non-regular graphs with $\Delta(G)=3$ (the bound is $5$ for $3$-regular graphs,
and it is $\Delta(G)$ for outerplanar graphs with $\Delta(G)\ge5$~\cite{SWWdm}).
In~\cite{LL10}, they observed that many of the bounds on $a'(G)$ for planar
graphs with forbidden cycle lengths hold also in the list context; also,
${\rm{mad}}(G)<4$ implies $a_\ell'(G)\le\Delta(G)+5$ and ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3$ implies
$a_\ell'(G)\le\Delta(G)+1$.  Extending Conjecture~\ref{Fiam}, they posed the
following conjectures:

\begin{conjecture}[Lai and Lih~\cite{LL13}]
Every graph $G$ satisfies $a_\ell'(G)=a'(G)$.
Every graph $G$ satisfies $a_\ell'(G)\le\Delta(G)+2$.
\end{conjecture}

\medskip

{\small

\begin{exercise}\label{gir5}
Complete the proof of Lemma~\ref{gir5dis}.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{noac4}
(Gr\"unbaum~\cite{Gru}, Kostochka--Mel'nikov~\cite{KMe})
Prove that the two graphs in Figure~\ref{fignoac} are not acylically
$4$-colorable.  The half-edges leaving the figure on the right lead to an
additional vertex having the same neighborhood as the central vertex.
\end{exercise}

\begin{figure}[hbt]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.178in
    \rlap{\kern 0.592in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.093in
    \rlap{\kern 1.120in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.093in
    \rlap{\kern 0.064in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 592 178}%
    \special{pa 1120 1093}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1120 1093}%
    \special{pa 64 1093}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 64 1093}%
    \special{pa 592 178}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.941in
    \rlap{\kern 0.592in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.712in
    \rlap{\kern 0.460in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.712in
    \rlap{\kern 0.724in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 592 941}%
    \special{pa 460 712}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 460 712}%
    \special{pa 724 712}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 724 712}%
    \special{pa 592 941}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 592 941}%
    \special{pa 64 1093}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 64 1093}%
    \special{pa 460 712}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 460 712}%
    \special{pa 592 178}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 592 178}%
    \special{pa 724 712}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 724 712}%
    \special{pa 1120 1093}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1120 1093}%
    \special{pa 592 941}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.153in
    \rlap{\kern 2.371in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.504in
    \rlap{\kern 2.855in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.072in
    \rlap{\kern 2.670in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.072in
    \rlap{\kern 2.072in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.504in
    \rlap{\kern 1.888in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.661in
    \rlap{\kern 2.371in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2371 661}%
    \special{pa 2371 0}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2371 661}%
    \special{pa 3000 457}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2371 661}%
    \special{pa 2760 1196}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2371 661}%
    \special{pa 1983 1196}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2371 661}%
    \special{pa 1743 457}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2371 153}%
    \special{pa 2541 428}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2541 428}%
    \special{pa 2855 504}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2855 504}%
    \special{pa 2686 228}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2686 228}%
    \special{pa 2371 153}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2855 504}%
    \special{pa 2645 750}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2645 750}%
    \special{pa 2670 1072}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2670 1072}%
    \special{pa 2880 826}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2880 826}%
    \special{pa 2855 504}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2670 1072}%
    \special{pa 2371 949}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2371 949}%
    \special{pa 2072 1072}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2072 1072}%
    \special{pa 2371 1196}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2371 1196}%
    \special{pa 2670 1072}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2072 1072}%
    \special{pa 2098 750}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2098 750}%
    \special{pa 1888 504}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1888 504}%
    \special{pa 1863 826}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1863 826}%
    \special{pa 2072 1072}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1888 504}%
    \special{pa 2202 428}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2202 428}%
    \special{pa 2371 153}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2371 153}%
    \special{pa 2057 228}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2057 228}%
    \special{pa 1888 504}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.428in
    \rlap{\kern 2.541in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.228in
    \rlap{\kern 2.686in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.750in
    \rlap{\kern 2.645in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.826in
    \rlap{\kern 2.880in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.949in
    \rlap{\kern 2.371in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.196in
    \rlap{\kern 2.371in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.750in
    \rlap{\kern 2.098in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.826in
    \rlap{\kern 1.863in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.428in
    \rlap{\kern 2.202in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.228in
    \rlap{\kern 2.057in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.259in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 3.000in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Graphs that are not acyclically $4$-colorable\label{fignoac}}
\end{figure}

\begin{exercise}\label{acyc4}
Prove that a $2$-vertex with a $3^-$-neighbor is reducible for acyclic
$4$-choosability.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Basavaraju--Chandran--Kummini~\cite{BCK})
Prove that if $G$ is regular, then $a'(G)\ge\Delta(G)+1$.  Prove that if
also $|V(G)|<2\Delta(G)$ and $|V(G)|$ is even, then $a'(G)\ge\Delta(G)+2$.
(Comment: Also $a'(K_{n,n})\ge\Delta(G)+2$ when $n$ is odd~\cite{BCK},
with equality when $n$ is an odd prime~\cite{BC09d}.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{aeplanar}
Use Lemma~\ref{12vert} to prove $a'_\ell(G)\le2\Delta(G)+24$ for planar $G$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
Use the lemma of van den Heuvel and McGuinness stated in Exercise 6.10
to prove that all planar graphs are acyclically 11-choosable.  (Hint:
Choose a vertex $v$ by their lemma, then triangulate $N(v)$ in $G-v$
appropriately.)
\end{exercise}

}

\subsection{Star Coloring}
Besides forbidding cycles, we may also restruct the maximum degree or diameter
of subgraphs induced by pairs of color classes.  We consider the latter first.
The paper on acyclic coloring by Gr\"unbaum~\cite{Gru} also introduced these
``star colorings''.

\begin{definition}
A {\it star coloring} is an acyclic coloring where the union of any two color
classes induces a forest of stars; equivalently, no $4$-vertex path is
$2$-colored.  The {\it star chromatic number} $s(G)$ (also written
$\chi_s(G)$) is the minimum number of colors in such a coloring.
The {\it star list chromatic number} $s_\ell(G)$ is the least $k$ such that
a star coloring of $G$ can be chosen from any $k$-uniform list assignment $L$.

A set $I$ of vertices is a {\it $2$-independent set} if the distance between
any two vertices of $I$ exceeds $2$.  An {\it $I,F$-partition} of a graph $G$,
introduced by Albertson et al.~\cite{ACKKR}, is a partition of $V(G)$ into sets
$I$ and $F$ such that $I$ is a $2$-independent set and $G[F]$ is a forest.
\end{definition}

Since every star coloring is an acyclic coloring, always $s(G)\gea(G)$.
All trees are acyclically $2$-colorable, but trees with diameter at least $3$
are not star $2$-colorable.

\begin{lemma}\label{IFpart}
Every forest is star $3$-colorable.  Also, if a graph $G$ has an
$I,F$-partition, then $s(G)\le 4$.  More generally, if $V(G)$ has a
partition into $F,\VEC I1k$ such that $G[F]$ is a forest and always $I_j$ is a
$2$-independent set in $G[F\cup I_1\cup\cdots\cup I_j]$, then $s(G)\le k+3$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
In a tree $T$, choose a root $r$ and color each vertex $v$ with $d_T(v,r)$,
reduced modulo $3$.  Each connected 2-colored subgraph is a star, consisting of
a vertex and its children.

Given the specified partition $F,\VEC I1k$, use three colors to produce a
star coloring of the forest.  Use one additional color on $I_j$ for each $j$.
Still there is no $2$-colored $4$-vertex path, since the highest-indexed color
appearing on it would be a $2$-independent set in the subgraph induced by its
vertices.
\end{proof}

Extensive results about star colorings and their relationships to other
parameters appear in papers by Fertin, Raspaud, and Reed~\cite{FRR} and by
Albertson et al.~\cite{ACKKR}, without discharging.  For example, for graphs
with maximum degree $k$ there is a relatively easy constructive upper bound
$s(G)\le k^2-k+2$~\cite{ACKKR} and a probabilistic argument for
$s(G)\le O(k^{3/2})$~\cite{FRR2}.  In terms of the acyclic chromatic
number,~\cite{ACKKR} proved $s(G)\le a(G)(2a(G)-1)$.

For planar graphs,~\cite{ACKKR} obtained constant bounds: always
$s(G)\le20$ when $G$ is planar, and sometimes $s(G)=10$~\cite{ACKKR}.
Let $s(g)$ be the maximum of $s(G)$ over planar graphs with girth at least
$g$, so $10\le s(3)\le 20$.  In~\cite{ACKKR} are also $s(5)\le 16$ and
$s(7)\le 9$, and $s(g)\ge4$ for all $g$.  In addition, $s(5)\ge6$~\cite{KT},
$s(7)\ge5$~\cite{Tim}, and $s(G)\le 14-g$ when $g\in\{6,7,8\}$ (K\"undgen
and Timmons~\cite{KT}) or $g=9$ (Timmons~\cite{Tim}).  The upper bounds
in~\cite{KT} hold also for the list version, and the arguments for
$g\in\{7,8\}$ use only the corresponding strict bounds on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ (that is,
$\frac{14}5$ and $\FR83$).

This brings us to the application of Lemma~\ref{IFpart}.  Our aim is not to
study general results on $s(G)$ for dense graphs, but rather to use
discharging to study what sparseness is need to reach $s(G)\le4$.
Timmons~\cite{Tim} proved that every graph with ${\rm{mad}}<\frac73$ has an
$I,F$-partition.  Later Bu et al.~\cite{BCMRW} improved the result to
${\rm{mad}}<\frac{26}{11}$, which yields $s(13)=4$.  The general version of
Lemma~\ref{IFpart} was used in \cite{BCMRW} to prove that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{18}7$
(and hence girth $9$ for planar graphs) implies $s(G)\le5$.

We prove the result of~\cite{Tim} here; it yields $s(14)=4$.  Recall that
$2$-vertices on threads incident to a vertex $v$ are {\it weak $2$-neighbors}
of $v$.

\begin{theorem}[Timmons~\cite{Tim}]\label{star73}
If ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac73$, then $V(G)$ can be partitioned into sets $I$ and $F$
such that $I$ is $2$-independent and $G[F]$ is a forest.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
We may assume that no component is a cycle, because in such a component it
suffices to put one vertex into $I$.  Having forbidden $2$-regular components,
Lemma~\ref{avdnbhd} with $t=2$ implies that $G$ has a $1^-$-vertex, a
$3$-thread, or a $3$-vertex with at least five weak $2$-neighbors.  Here the
discharging rule is the obvious one when $1^-$-vertices are forbidden: each
$2$-vertex takes $\FR16$ from each end of the maximal thread containing it.

It therefore suffices to prove these configurations reducible for the existence
of $I,F$-partitions.  A $1^-$-vertex $v$ can be added to the forest in any such
partition of $G-v$.

Let $\langle v,w,x,y,z\rangle$ be a $3$-thread in $G$; vertices $w,x,y$ each have degree
$2$.  Let $I',F'$ be an $I,F$-partition of $G-\{w,x,y\}$.  If $v$ or $z$ is in
$I'$, then add $\{w,x,y\}$ to $F'$ to form an $I,F$-partition of $G$.
Otherwise, add $x$ to $I'$ and $\{w,y\}$ to $F'$, as in Figure~\ref{figIF}.

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 0.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 0.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 1.050in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 1.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 150 270}%
    \special{pa 1350 270}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 0 120}%
    \special{pa 150 270}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 150 270}%
    \special{pa 0 420}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1500 120}%
    \special{pa 1350 270}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1350 270}%
    \special{pa 1500 420}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.300in
    \rlap{\kern 0.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.300in
    \rlap{\kern 1.470in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $I'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.390in
    \rlap{\kern 0.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.390in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.390in
    \rlap{\kern 1.050in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 0.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 1.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 0.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $w$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 1.050in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $y$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 0.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 0.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 1.050in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 1.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 150 1170}%
    \special{pa 1350 1170}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 0 1020}%
    \special{pa 150 1170}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 150 1170}%
    \special{pa 0 1320}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1500 1020}%
    \special{pa 1350 1170}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1350 1170}%
    \special{pa 1500 1320}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.200in
    \rlap{\kern 0.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.200in
    \rlap{\kern 1.470in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.290in
    \rlap{\kern 0.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.290in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $I$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.290in
    \rlap{\kern 1.050in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.420in
    \rlap{\kern 2.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.420in
    \rlap{\kern 2.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 2.850in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.120in
    \rlap{\kern 2.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.120in
    \rlap{\kern 2.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 3.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 3.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 3.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 2550 420}%
    \special{pa 2850 270}%
    \special{pa 2550 120}%
    \special{pa 2850 270}%
    \special{pa 3750 270}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 2250 420}%
    \special{pa 2550 420}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 2550 120}%
    \special{pa 2250 120}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2160 330}%
    \special{pa 2250 420}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2250 420}%
    \special{pa 2160 510}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2160 30}%
    \special{pa 2250 120}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2250 120}%
    \special{pa 2160 210}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3840 180}%
    \special{pa 3750 270}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3750 270}%
    \special{pa 3840 360}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.300in
    \rlap{\kern 2.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $w'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.300in
    \rlap{\kern 2.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 2.850in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 2.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 2.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $w$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 3.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 3.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $y$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 3.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.320in
    \rlap{\kern 2.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.320in
    \rlap{\kern 2.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 2.850in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.020in
    \rlap{\kern 2.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.020in
    \rlap{\kern 2.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 3.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 3.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 3.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 2550 1320}%
    \special{pa 2850 1170}%
    \special{pa 2550 1020}%
    \special{pa 2850 1170}%
    \special{pa 3750 1170}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 2250 1320}%
    \special{pa 2550 1320}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 2550 1020}%
    \special{pa 2250 1020}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2160 1230}%
    \special{pa 2250 1320}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2250 1320}%
    \special{pa 2160 1410}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2160 930}%
    \special{pa 2250 1020}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2250 1020}%
    \special{pa 2160 1110}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3840 1080}%
    \special{pa 3750 1170}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3750 1170}%
    \special{pa 3840 1260}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.350in
    \rlap{\kern 2.100in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.440in
    \rlap{\kern 2.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.290in
    \rlap{\kern 2.850in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $I$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.140in
    \rlap{\kern 2.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.050in
    \rlap{\kern 2.100in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.290in
    \rlap{\kern 3.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.290in
    \rlap{\kern 3.450in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 3.900in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $?$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.420in
    \rlap{\kern 4.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.420in
    \rlap{\kern 4.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 4.950in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.120in
    \rlap{\kern 4.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.120in
    \rlap{\kern 4.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 5.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 5.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 5.850in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 4650 420}%
    \special{pa 4950 270}%
    \special{pa 4650 120}%
    \special{pa 4950 270}%
    \special{pa 5850 270}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 4350 420}%
    \special{pa 4650 420}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 4650 120}%
    \special{pa 4350 120}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 4260 330}%
    \special{pa 4350 420}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4350 420}%
    \special{pa 4260 510}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4260 30}%
    \special{pa 4350 120}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4350 120}%
    \special{pa 4260 210}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5940 180}%
    \special{pa 5850 270}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5850 270}%
    \special{pa 5940 360}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.450in
    \rlap{\kern 4.200in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.540in
    \rlap{\kern 4.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.390in
    \rlap{\kern 4.950in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.240in
    \rlap{\kern 4.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.150in
    \rlap{\kern 4.200in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $I'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.390in
    \rlap{\kern 5.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $I$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.390in
    \rlap{\kern 5.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.270in
    \rlap{\kern 6.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.320in
    \rlap{\kern 4.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.320in
    \rlap{\kern 4.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 4.950in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.020in
    \rlap{\kern 4.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.020in
    \rlap{\kern 4.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 5.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 5.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 5.850in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 4650 1320}%
    \special{pa 4950 1170}%
    \special{pa 4650 1020}%
    \special{pa 4950 1170}%
    \special{pa 5850 1170}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 4350 1320}%
    \special{pa 4650 1320}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pa 4650 1020}%
    \special{pa 4350 1020}%
    \special{da 0.060}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 4260 1230}%
    \special{pa 4350 1320}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4350 1320}%
    \special{pa 4260 1410}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4260 930}%
    \special{pa 4350 1020}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4350 1020}%
    \special{pa 4260 1110}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5940 1080}%
    \special{pa 5850 1170}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5850 1170}%
    \special{pa 5940 1260}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.350in
    \rlap{\kern 4.200in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.440in
    \rlap{\kern 4.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.290in
    \rlap{\kern 4.950in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.140in
    \rlap{\kern 4.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.050in
    \rlap{\kern 4.200in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $I'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.290in
    \rlap{\kern 5.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.290in
    \rlap{\kern 5.550in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $F$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.170in
    \rlap{\kern 6.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $I'$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.470in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 6.000in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-1pc}

\caption{Reducibility cases for Theorem~\ref{star73}\label{figIF}}
\end{figure}

Finally, consider a $3$-vertex $u$ with at least five weak $2$-neighbors.
If one of the threads has three $2$-vertices, then $G$ has a $3$-thread.
Otherwise, $u$ has at least two incident $2$-threads plus a $2$-neighbor on the
third incident thread.  It suffices to consider a $2$-thread $\langle u,x,y,z\rangle$
and two $1$-threads $\langle u,v,w\rangle$ and $\langle u,v',w'\rangle$ incident to $u$ (see
Figure~\ref{figIF}).  Let $R=\{w,w'\}$ and $S=\{u,x,y,v,v\}$, and let $G'=G-S$.
Let $I',F'$ be an $I,F$-partition of $G'$.  If $R\cap I'=\varnothing$, then add $x$ to
$I'$ and the rest of $S$ to $F'$.  If $R\cap I'\ne\varnothing$ and $z\notin I'$, then
add $v$ to $I'$ and the rest of $S$ to $F'$.  If $R\cap I'\ne\varnothing$ and
$z\in I'$, then add all of $S$ to $F'$.  In each case, the resulting sets form
an $I,F$-partition of $G$.
\end{proof}

Reducibility of $3$-vertices in this proof uses only four weak $2$-neighbors,
when they distribute as $(4,0,0)$ or $(3,1,0)$ or $(2,1,1)$ on the incident
threads.  This suggests using ${\overline{d}}(G)<\frac{12}5$; then $2$-vertices taking
$\FR15$ from each end of their maximal incident threads would leave
$2$-vertices and $3$-vertices both with charge at least $\frac{12}5$ when each
$3$-vertex has at most three weak $2$-neighbors.  The difficulty is that four
weak $2$-neighbors may be distributed as $(2,2,0)$, and this configuration is
not reducible.  Note that $\frac 73< \frac{26}{11}<\frac{12}5$.  The strengthening of
Theorem~\ref{star73} to the hypothesis ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{26}{11}$~\cite{BCMRW} must
address the situation where all $3$-vertices with four weak $2$-neighbors have
this configuration.  In fact, even the configuration consisting of two adjacent
such $3$-vertices is not reducible (Exercise~\ref{IFnonred}).

It is not known whether the improvement of Theorem~\ref{star73} to
${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{26}{11}$ is sharp.  The smallest known value of ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ in graphs
without an $I,F$-partition is $\FR52$ (Exercise~\ref{noIF}).  The largest
known girth of a planar graph without an $I,F$-partition is $7$~\cite{Tim}.

\begin{problem}
Determine the largest $b$ such that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<b$ guarantees an $I,F$-partition
of $G$.  Determine the smallest $g$ such that all planar graphs with girth at
least $g$ have $I,F$-partitions.  Do the answers differ from the values that
guarantee $s(G)\le4$?
\end{problem}

We mentioned that some of the results on star coloring of planar graphs
extend to the list version of star coloring.  In particular,
K\"undgen and Timmons~\cite{KT} proved that $s_\ell(G)\le 8$ when $G$ is
a planar graph with girth at least $6$.  This is a special case of the result
of Chen, Raspaud, and Wang~\cite{CRW1} that $s_\ell(G)\le 8$ when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<3$.

Another way to study star coloring of sparse graphs is to seek sharp bounds
for fixed small values of the maximum degree.  When $\Delta(G)=2$, the upper
bound $\Delta(G)^2-\Delta(G)+2$ by Albertson et al.~\cite{ACKKR} specializes
to $4$, which is sharp due to the $5$-cycle.  It specializes to $8$ when
$\Delta(G)=3$, but Chen, Raspaud, and Wang~\cite{CRW2} proved that
$s(G)\le6$ for all graphs with maximum degree $3$.  This also is sharp, by
the $3$-regular graph in Exercise~\ref{exstar6}.

Always ${\rm{mad}}(G)\le\Delta(G)$, so one can attempt to extend coloring results for
graphs with $\Delta(G)\le D$ to the larger family with ${\rm{mad}}(G)\le D$, perhaps
with some small additional number of colors.  The results of~\cite{CRW1}
and~\cite{CRW2} for $D=3$ motivate such an effort.  Unfortunately, no such
result is possible for $D\ge4$.

\begin{proposition}\label{nobound}
For $k\in{\mathbb N}$, there is a graph $G$ such that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<4$ and
$s(G)>k$.  In fact, there is also such a graph with $a(G)>k$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $G_n$ be the graph obtained from the complete graph $K_n$ by subdividing
every edge once.  Note that $G_n$ has $n(n+1)/2$ vertices and $n(n-1)$ edges;
thus ${\overline{d}}(G_n)=4-\frac{8}{n+1}$, and in fact ${\rm{mad}}(G_n)=4-\FR8{n+1}$.

If $n>k^2+k$, then by the pigeonhole principle any $k$-coloring $\phi$ of $G_n$
has some $k+2$ high-degree vertices with the same color.  Now color each edge
of a complete graph $H$ on these vertices by the color of their common neighbor
in $\phi$.  If two incident edges of $H$ have the same color, then $\phi$ is
not a star coloring of $G_n$.  Thus $s(G_n)\le k$ requires $\chi'(H)\le k$.
However, $\chi'(K_{k+2})>k$, so $s(G_{k^2+k+1})>k$.

The same idea gives a construction for $a(G)>k$ a bit later.  With
$n>2 k^2$, we obtain $2k+1$ high-degree vertices with the same color.
Now $\phi$ fails to be an acyclic coloring of $G_n$ if the edges of some cycle
in $H$ have the same color.  A complete graph decomposes into $k$ forests
only if it has at most $2k$ vertices.  Hence $a(G_{2k^2+1})>k$.
\end{proof}

The constructions in Proposition~\ref{nobound} suggest several questions.

\begin{problem}
For $3<b<4$, is it true that $s(G)$ or $a(G)$ (or their list versions)
is bounded when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<b$?  Given $k$, what is the minimum number of vertices
in a graph $G$ with ${\rm{mad}}(G)<4$ and $s(G)>k$ (or $a(G)>k$)?
\end{problem}

\medskip

{\small

\begin{exercise}\label{IFnonred}
Argue that the configuration consisting of two $3$-vertices each incident
to two $2$-threads is not reducible for the existence of $I,F$-partitions.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{noIF}
Construct an infinite family of graphs with maximum average degree $\FR52$
that have no $I,F$-partition.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{exstar6}
(Fertin--Raspaud--Reed~\cite{FRR2},
Albertson et al.~\cite{ACKKR})
For each graph $G$ in Figure~\ref{star6}, prove that $\chi_s(G)=6$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.169in
    \rlap{\kern 0.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.043in
    \rlap{\kern 1.155in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.043in
    \rlap{\kern 0.146in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 650 751}%
    \special{pa 650 169}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 650 169}%
    \special{pa 1155 1043}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1155 1043}%
    \special{pa 146 1043}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 650 169}%
    \special{pa 146 1043}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 146 1043}%
    \special{pa 650 751}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 650 751}%
    \special{pa 1155 1043}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 479 652}%
    \special{pa 650 751}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 479 652}%
    \special{pa 650 169}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 479 652}%
    \special{pa 146 1043}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 822 652}%
    \special{pa 650 751}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 822 652}%
    \special{pa 650 169}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 822 652}%
    \special{pa 1155 1043}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 146 1043}%
    \special{pa 565 702}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 565 702}%
    \special{pa 650 169}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 650 169}%
    \special{pa 736 702}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 736 702}%
    \special{pa 1155 1043}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 650 897}%
    \special{pa 650 751}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 650 897}%
    \special{pa 1155 1043}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 650 897}%
    \special{pa 146 1043}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.751in
    \rlap{\kern 0.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 0.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.702in
    \rlap{\kern 0.565in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.702in
    \rlap{\kern 0.736in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.652in
    \rlap{\kern 0.479in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.652in
    \rlap{\kern 0.822in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.146in
    \rlap{\kern 2.402in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.398in
    \rlap{\kern 2.654in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.755in
    \rlap{\kern 2.654in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.007in
    \rlap{\kern 2.402in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.007in
    \rlap{\kern 2.045in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.755in
    \rlap{\kern 1.793in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.398in
    \rlap{\kern 1.793in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.146in
    \rlap{\kern 2.045in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2402 146}%
    \special{pa 2654 398}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2654 398}%
    \special{pa 2654 755}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2654 755}%
    \special{pa 2402 1007}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2402 1007}%
    \special{pa 2045 1007}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2045 1007}%
    \special{pa 1793 755}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1793 755}%
    \special{pa 1793 398}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1793 398}%
    \special{pa 2045 146}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2045 146}%
    \special{pa 2402 146}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2402 146}%
    \special{pa 2045 1007}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2654 398}%
    \special{pa 1793 755}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2654 755}%
    \special{pa 1793 398}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2402 1007}%
    \special{pa 2045 146}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.188in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 2.800in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-1pc}

\caption{Graphs with star chromatic number $6$\label{star6}}
\end{figure}

\begin{exercise}
(Bartnicki et al.~\cite{BBCMZ})
Let $G$ be a graph.  A function $f\colon\, V(G)\to\{1,\ldots,k\}$ is an
{\it additive $k$-coloring} of $G$ if the function $\phi$ defined by
$\phi(v)=\sum_{u\in N(v)}f(u)$ is a proper coloring of $G$.  The {\it additive
chromatic number} of a graph $G$, written $\chi_{\rm add}(G)$, is the least $k$
such that $G$ has an additive $k$-coloring.  From~\cite{BBCMZ}, every forest is
additively $2$-colorable (one can prove this inductively).  Conclude that if
$G$ has an $I,F$-partition, then $\chi_{add}(G) \le 4$.  (Comment: In fact, the
result from~\cite{BBCMZ} uses the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz to prove that
forests are additively $2$-choosable.)
\end{exercise}

}

\subsection{Linear Coloring}
Instead of restricting the diameter of bicolored forests in acyclic colorings,
we now restrict their maximum degree.  Introduced by Yuster~\cite{Y},
a {\it linear coloring} of a graph $G$ is an acyclic coloring in which every
bicolored forest has maximum degree at most $2$.  Let ${\rm lc}(G)$ denote the
minimum number of colors needed.  Always ${\rm lc}(G)\ge\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+1$, because each color
appears at most twice in $N(v)$ when $d(v)=\Delta(G)$, and $v$ itself needs
another color.  For planar graphs with girth at least $7$, $9$, $11$, or $13$,
Raspaud and Wang~\cite{RW} proved that ${\rm lc}(G)=\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+1$ when the maximum degree
is at least $13$, $7$, $5$, or $3$, respectively.

A graph $G$ is {\it linearly $k$-choosable} if for every $k$-uniform list
assignment $L$, there is a linear $L$-coloring of $G$.  Esperet, Montassier,
and Raspaud~\cite{EMR} introduced this concept, using the notation
$\Lambda^l(G)$ for the least such $k$.  For consistency with other notation
in this paper, we use $\lc_{\ell}(G)$.  We will prove that $\lc_{\ell}(G)\le\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+4$ for
every planar graph with girth at least $5$, near the trivial lower bound for
linear coloring.  In~\cite{EMR} there are better bounds for larger girth.  In
fact, they are the usual corollaries of bounds in terms of ${\rm{mad}}(G)$: if
${\rm{mad}}(G)<b_j$, then $G$ is linearly $(\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+j)$-choosable, where
$b_3=\FR83$, $b_2=\FR52$, and $b_1=\frac{16}7$, the latter requiring
$\Delta(G)\ge3$.  See Exercises~\ref{EMR1}--\ref{EMR3}.

\begin{theorem}
If $G$ is planar with girth at least 5 and $\Delta(G)\le D$, then
$\lc_{\ell}(G)\le\CL{\FR12 D}+4$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let $G$ be a minimal counterexample, with a $(\CL{\FR12 D}+4)$-uniform list assignment
$L$ from which no linear coloring can be chosen.  Every proper induced subgraph
$G'$ has a linear $L$-coloring $\phi$.  To extend $\phi$ successfully to a
missing vertex $w$, we seek a color that does not appear on $N_G(w)$ and does
not appear on two vertices having distance $2$ from $w$ in $G$.

By minimality, $G$ is connected.  If $G$ has a 1-vertex $v$, then let $G'=G-v$.
We must avoid at most $1+\FL{\FR12(D-1)}$ colors.  Since $|L(v)|=\CL{\FR12 D}+4$, a
color is available for $v$.

We may therefore assume $\delta(G)\ge 2$.  Since $G$ also is planar with girth
at least 5, Lemma~\ref{gir5dis} implies that $G$ has a $2$-vertex $v$ with a
$5^-$-neighbor $u$ or a $5$-face whose incident vertices are four $3$-vertices
and a $5^-$-vertex.

In the case $d_G(v)=2$, let $w$ be the other neighbor of $v$, and let $G'=G-v$.
Since $d_G(u)\le5$, the number of forbidden colors is at most
$2+\FL{\frac{(D-1)+(5-1)}2}$, which equals $\CL{\FR12 D}+3$.  Since
$|L(v)|=\CL{\FR12 D}+4$, a color remains available for $v$.

Hence we may assume that $G$ contains a $5$-face whose incident vertices are
$3$-vertices $v_1,v_2,v_3,v_4$ in cyclic order plus a $5^-$-vertex $w$.  Let
$x_2$ and $x_3$ denote the remaining neighbors of $v_2$ and $v_3$, respectively,
as labeled in Figure~\ref{figacy6}.

Let $G'=G-\{v_2,v_3\}$, and let $\phi$ be a linear $L$-coloring of $G'$.  Each
of the two missing vertices has two colored neighbors and at most $4+(D-1)$
colored vertices at distance $2$.  Since $\FL{(D+4-1)/2}=\CL{\FR12 D}+1$, there are
at most $\CL{\FR12 D}+3$ colors to avoid, so for each of $v_2$ and $v_3$ a color
remains available.

However, each could be left with only the same single color available.  To
complete the proof, we show that $v_2$ or $v_3$ has at least two colors
available; we extend to that vertex last.  If $\phi(v_1)=\phi(x_2)$, then $v_1$
and $x_2$ together forbid only one color, and $v_2$ still has two available.
Hence we may assume $\phi(v_1)\ne\phi(x_2)$.  Similarly, we may also assume
$\phi(v_4)\ne \phi(x_3)$.

Since $\phi(v_1)\ne \phi(x_2)$, coloring $v_3$ cannot give $v_2$ three
neighbors with the same color.  Also, we claim that coloring $v_3$ cannot
create a $2$-colored cycle.  Since $\phi(v_4)\ne\phi(x_3)$, such a cycle must
contain $v_2$ and one of $\{v_4,x_3\}$.  By requiring that $v_2$ does not
receive a color appearing on two or more vertices at distance $2$ from $v_2$,
we prevent such a $2$-colored cycle.

Therefore, after extending the coloring to $v_2$ as before, it suffices for
$v_3$ to avoid the colors appearing on $\{v_2,x_3,v_4\}$ or on at least two
vertices of $N(v_4)\cup N(x_3)$.  The number to avoid is at most
$3+\FL{\frac{(D-1)+2}2}$, which equals $\CL{D/2}+3$.  Hence a color remains
available for $v_3$.  (That is, before coloring $v_2$, two colors were
available at $v_3$.)
\end{proof}

A similar but more detailed argument proves $\lc_{\ell}\le\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+3$ when $G$ is
planar with girth at least 5 and $\Delta(G)\ge 13$.  To do this, we first
refine Lemma~\ref{gir5dis} to show that if $\Delta(G)\ge 13$, then in (RC1)
either a $2$-vertex has a $4^-$-neighbor or it has a $5$-neighbor and a
$12^-$-neighbor.  Furthermore, we can require in (RC2) that at most two outside
neighbors of the four $3$-vertices on the $5$-face have high degree.  These
improvements use that faces only need $\FR13$ from each incident $6^+$-vertex
$v$, not $\frac{d(v)-4}{d(v)}$.  Thus $7^+$-vertices have extra charge they can
send to $2$-neighbors and $3$-neighbors.  With more careful analysis, these new
configurations are reducible even with only $\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+3$ colors.

The problem is harder for general planar graphs, even in the non-list version.
Li, Wang, and Raspaud~\cite{LWR} proved that if $G$ is planar with
$\Delta(G) \ge 52$, then ${\rm lc}(G)\le (\floor{.9\Delta(G)}+5)$, dropping the
coefficient below $1$.  Along the way, they proved ${\rm lc}(G)\le\Delta(G)+15$ for
all planar $G$ (Exercise~\ref{exlast}).  Finally, they asked whether there is a
constant $c$ such that ${\rm lc}(G)\le\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+c$ for every planar graph $G$.

Beyond planar graphs, Yuster~\cite{Y} studied ${\rm lc}(G)$ when $\Delta(G)=k$,
proving that it is bounded by $O(k^{3/2})$ and constructing
instances where $\Omega(k^{3/2})$ colors are needed.  Contrast this with the
acyclic chromatic number, where the upper bound is $O(k^{4/3})$ and examples
are known needing $\Omega(k^{4/3}/(\log k)^{1/3})$ colors.  Linear coloring
requires more colors but is simpler to analyze in the sense that the upper and
lower bounds on the extremal problem for fixed maximum degree differ only by a
constant factor.  In terms of the maximum degree, Li et al.~\cite{LWR} proved
${\rm lc}(G)\le\binom{\Delta(G)+1}2$ in general, plus ${\rm lc}(G)\le8$ when $\Delta(G)=4$
and ${\rm lc}(G)\le14$ when $\Delta(G)=5$.  Also, Esperet et al.~\cite{EMR} proved
that $G$ is linearly $5$-choosable when $\Delta(G)=3$ and conjectured that
$K_{3,3}$ is the only such graph that is not linearly $4$-choosable.

\medskip
We previously mentioned the arboricity problem, where the edge set rather than
the vertex set is partitioned.  To distinguish edge-partitioning from coloring
problems, we let a {\it decomposition} of a graph $G$ be a set of edge-disjoint
subgraphs whose union is $G$.  Decomposition into matchings, known as
edge-coloring, is just proper coloring of the line graph.  Decomposition into
linear forests is not the same problem as linear coloring of the line graph,
because vertices on a path in the line graph of $G$ may correspond to the edges
of a star in $G$.  However, since a path in $G$ does become a (shorter) path in
the line graph, the {\it linear arboricity} of a graph (the minimum number of
linear forests needed to decompose it) is always at least the linear chromatic
number of its line graph.  We use the common notation ${\rm la}(G)$ for the linear
arboricity.

Trivially, ${\rm la}(G)\ge \CL{\Delta(G)/2}$, but equality when $G$ is
$2r$-regular would require each color class to be a spanning $2$-regular
subgraph and hence contain cycles.  Akiyama, Exoo, and Harary~\cite{AEH1,AEH2}
conjectured that always ${\rm la}(G) \le \ceil{(\Delta(G)+1)/2}$.  This was proved
for $\Delta(G)\in\{1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10\}$ (together) in \cite{AEH1,AEH2,EP,Gul}.
For $\epsilon>0$, Alon~\cite{Alon} proved that
${\rm la}(G)\le(\FR12+\epsilon)\Delta(G)$ when $\Delta(G)$ is sufficiently large.
When $G$ is planar, the conjecture was proved for $\Delta(G)\ge9$ by
Wu~\cite{jlw} (presented below) and for $\Delta(G)=7$ by Wu and Wu~\cite{WW},
so the proof is now complete for planar graphs.

In the proof, Borodin's extension of Kotzig's Theorem (Lemma~\ref{kotzig}) is
very helpful: if a planar graph $G$ with $\delta(G)\ge3$ has no edge with
weight at most $11$, then it has a $3$-alternating $4$-cycle.  Let a
{\it linear $t$-decomposition} be a decomposition into $t$ linear forests.
We view the $t$ linear forests as $t$ colors in an edge-coloring.

\begin{theorem}[Wu~\cite{jlw}]\label{larbthm}
If $G$ is a planar graph with $\Delta(G)\ge9$, then
${\rm la}(G) \le \ceil{\frac{\Delta(G)+1}2}$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
It suffices to show for each positive integer $t$ with $t\ge5$ that every
planar graph $G$ with $\Delta(G)<2t$ has a linear $t$-decomposition.

For an edge $uv$ with weight at most $2t+1$, consider a linear
$t$-decomposition of $G-uv$.  Since $d_{G-uv}(u)+d_{G-uv}(v)<2t$, fewer than
$t$ colors appear twice at $u$ or twice at $v$ or once at each.  Thus a color
is available at $uv$ to extend the linear decomposition to $G$.

Hence we may assume weight at least $2t+2$ for every edge.  Since
$\Delta(G)<2t$, this yields $\delta(G)\ge3$.  Now Lemma~\ref{3alt4} yields a
$4$-cycle $[u,x,v,y]$ in $G$ with $d(u)=d(v)=3$.  Let $u'$ and $v'$ be the
remaining neighbors of $u$ and $v$, respectively (see Figure~\ref{figlarb}).
Note that $\{u,v\}=\{u',v'\}$ is forbidden, but $u'=v'$ is possible, requiring
a similar analysis that we omit.
\looseness-1

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.362in
    \rlap{\kern 0.103in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.362in
    \rlap{\kern 0.491in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.621in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.362in
    \rlap{\kern 1.009in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.362in
    \rlap{\kern 1.397in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.103in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 491 362}%
    \special{pa 750 621}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 621}%
    \special{pa 1009 362}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1009 362}%
    \special{pa 750 103}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 103}%
    \special{pa 491 362}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 103 362}%
    \special{pa 491 362}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1009 362}%
    \special{pa 1397 362}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.259in
    \rlap{\kern 0.103in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.259in
    \rlap{\kern 0.466in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.724in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $y$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.259in
    \rlap{\kern 1.397in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.259in
    \rlap{\kern 1.034in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $x$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.724in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 1.500in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-1pc}

\caption{Reducible configuration for Theorem~\ref{larbthm}\label{figlarb}}
\end{figure}

The weight restrictions and $\Delta(G)\le2t-1$ imply that each of $x,y,u',v'$
has degree $2t-1$ in $G$.  Hence a linear $t$-decomposition of $G-\{u,v\}$
has $2t-3$ colored edges at both $x$ and $y$ and $2t-2$ colored edges at both
$u'$ and $v'$.  We conclude that at most one color is missing at each of these
vertices; call a vertex ``bad'' if a color is missing.  For a vertex $z$, let
$C(z)$ and $C'(z)$ denote the sets of colors appearing at $z$ exactly once and
at most once, respectively.

{\it Case 1: Neither $x$ nor $y$ is bad.}
Here $|C(x)|=|C(y)|=3$.
First color $uu'$ from $C'(u')$, then $ux$ from $C(x)$, and then $uy$ from
$C(y)$.  Make the colors on $ux$ and $uy$ differ.  If $u'$ is bad, then the
color on $uu'$ may be used on $ux$ or $uy$, but otherwise the three edges
have distinct colors.  Two colors from each of $C(x)$ and $C(y)$ remain, and we
ensure these remaining pairs are not equal.  Now we can choose distinct
colors on the three edges at $v$.

{\it Case 2: One of $x$ and $y$ is bad.}
We may assume by symmetry that $x$ is bad; still $|C(y)|=3$.  Give $ux$ the
color missing at $x$, and give $xv$ the one color in $C(x)$.  Color $vv'$ from
$C'(v')$, different from the color on $xv$ if $v'$ is not bad.  Now color $vy$
from $C(y)$ avoiding the colors on $xv$ and $vv'$.  Now color $uu'$ from
$C'(u')$, and choose a color for $uy$ from $C(y)$ avoiding that and the color
on $vy$.  Note that $uu'$ or $uy$ may have the same color as $ux$.

{\it Case 3: $x$ and $y$ are both bad.}
If the one missing color at each of $x$ and $y$ is the same, then use it on
$ux$ and $vy$.  Now use the color in $C(x)$ on $xv$ and the color in $C(y)$
on $yu$.  If $u'$ is bad, then its missing color can be used on $uu'$;
otherwise, color $uu'$ from $C(u')$ to avoid the color on $yu$.  The
symmetric argument applies to color $vv'$.

If the missing colors at $x$ and $y$ are different, then use the color missing
at $x$ on $ux$ and $xv$, and use the color missing at $y$ on $uy$ and $yv$.
If a color is missing at $u'$, use it on $uu'$, and then use any color from
$C'(v')$ on $vv'$.  By symmetry, then, only $|C(u')|=|C(v')|=2$ remains, and it
suffices to give $uu'$ and $vv'$ distinct colors from these sets.
\end{proof}

Also, Wu~\cite{jlw} proved that ${\rm la}(G)=\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}$ when $G$ is planar with
$\Delta(G)\ge 13$, using a stronger form of a lemma by Borodin (see
Exercise~\ref{wu}).  Cygan, Kowalik, and Luzar~\cite{CKL} proved that the same
conclusion holds in the larger class of planar $G$ with $\Delta(G)\ge 10$, and
they conjectured that $\Delta(G)\ge 6$ is sufficient.

\smallskip

{\small

\begin{exercise}\label{EMR1}
(Esperet--Montassier--Raspaud~\cite{EMR})
Prove that a $1$-vertex, a $3$-thread, and a $3$-vertex incident to three
$2$-threads are all reducible for $\lc_{\ell}(G)\le\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+1$ when $\Delta(G)\ge3$.
Conclude that $\lc_{\ell}(G)\le\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+1$ when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{16}7$ and $\Delta(G)\ge3$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{EMR2}
(\cite{EMR})
Prove that a $1$-vertex, a $2$-thread, and a $3$-vertex with three
$2$-neighbors are all reducible for $\lc_{\ell}(G)\le\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+2$.
Conclude that $\lc_{\ell}(G)\le\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+2$ when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{5}2$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{EMR3}
(\cite{EMR})
Prove that a $1$-vertex, a $2$-thread, and a $3$-vertex with two
$2$-neighbors are all reducible for $\lc_{\ell}(G)\le\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+3$.
Conclude that $\lc_{\ell}(G)\le\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}+3$ when ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac{8}3$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{HMex}
(van den Heuvel--McGuinness~\cite{HM})
Prove that every planar graph $G$ with $\delta(G)\ge3$ has a $5^-$-vertex $v$
with at most two $12^+$-neighbors such that $v$ has a $7^-$-neighbor if
$d(v)\in\{4,5\}$, and $v$ has an additional $6^-$-neighbor if $d(v)=5$.
(Hint: Extend the proof of Lemma~\ref{12vert} by allowing $5^-$-vertices to
take some charge from their $11^-$-neighbors.  Comment: This is the stronger
version of Lemma~\ref{12vert} used in~\cite{HM} to prove
$\chi(G^2)\le 2\Delta(G)+25$ when $G$ is planar; see Exercise~\ref{D+25}.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{exlast}
(Li--Wang--Raspaud~\cite{LWR})
The general bound ${\rm lc}(G)\le\binom{\Delta(G)+1}2$ in~\cite{LWR} yields
${\rm lc}(G)\le\Delta(G)+15$ when $\Delta(G)\le6$.  Use Exercise~\ref{exfirst} for
$\Delta(G)\in\{7,8\}$ and Exercise~\ref{HMex} for $\Delta(G)\ge9$ to prove
${\rm lc}(G)\le\Delta(G)+15$ for every planar graph $G$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}
(Esperet–-Montassier-–Raspaud~\cite{EMR}) Use Exercise~\ref{HMex} to prove
$\lc_{\ell}(G)\le\Delta(G)+26$ for every planar graph $G$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{wu}
(Wu~\cite{jlw}) Strengthen Lemma~\ref{altcyc} to show that every planar graph
contains an edge of weight at most $15$ or a $2$-alternating cycle such that
some high-degree vertex on the cycle has an additional $2$-neighbor outside the
cycle.  Conclude that ${\rm la}(G)=\CL{\FR12\Delta(G)}$ for every planar graph $G$ with
$\Delta(G)\ge 13$.
\end{exercise}

}

\subsection{Improper Coloring}

We close this section by studying a type of relaxed vertex coloring.  When
adjacency represents conflict, independent sets are ``conflict-free'', but one
may not need such a strong restriction.  There are many ways to weaken the
requirements on subgraphs induced by color classes while still remaining rather
sparse; one then obtains a coloring parameter by seeking the minimum number of
such classes need to cover the vertex set.

Planar graphs are $4$-colorable.  Gr\"otzsch's Theorem gives $3$-colorability
for the restricted class of triangle-free planar graphs.  Alternatively, we
study what relaxations of the restriction on color classes permit successful
$3$-colorings.

For example, one could require that the subgraph induced by a color class have
no $(k+1)$-edge-connected subgraph.  Setting $k=0$ yields the ordinary
chromatic number, and setting $k=1$ yields the parameter called
{\it vertex arboricity}.  As observed by Stein, a consequence of Borodin's
acyclic 5-colorability of planar graphs is that the vertices of a planar graph
can be colored with three colors so that one class is independent and the other
two induce forests.

Intermediate between independent sets and general forests are restricted
forests with bounded degree or diameter.  For example, one may ask what
requirement on girth in planar graphs is needed to guarantee a $3$-coloring of
the vertices so that two colors induce matchings and the third induces a
forest.  It would also be natural to explore what bounds on vertex arboricity
(or vertex linear arboricity) follow from ${\rm{mad}}(G)<b$.

In the remainder of this section, we simply bound the vertex degrees in induced
subgraphs.  The parameters measure how ``improper'' a color class is allowed
to be.

\begin{definition}
A {\it $(\VEC d1t)$-improper} (or ``-defective'' or ``-relaxed'') coloring of a
graph $G$ is a partition of $V(G)$ into sets $\VEC V1t$ such that
$\Delta(G[V_i])\le d_i$ for $1\le i\le t$.  For simplicity, we abbreviate the
term to $(\VEC d1t)$-coloring and say that such a graph is
{\it $(\VEC d1t)$-colorable}.  Without indicating the number of colors, a
coloring is {\it $d$-improper} if each vertex has at most $d$ neighbors of its
own color.  A graph is {\it $t|d$-choosable} if from any $t$-uniform list
assignment a $d$-improper coloring can be chosen.
\end{definition}

The Four Color Theorem states that every planar graph is $(0,0,0,0)$-colorable.
When only three colors are used, we cannot guarantee $(0,0,0)$-colorings, but
for $i,j,k\ge0$ we can ask for classes of planar graphs guaranteed to be
$(i,j,k)$-colorable or $(i,j)$-colorable.  The questions seem even more
natural in terms of ${\rm{mad}}(G)$, recalling the classical result of
Lov\'asz~\cite{Lo} stating that if $\SE i1t d_i\ge D-t+1$, then every graph
with maximum degree $D$ is $(\VEC d1t)$-colorable.

Cowen, Cowen, and Woodall~\cite{CCW} proved that every planar graph is
$(2,2,2)$-colorable.  Eaton and Hull~\cite{EH} and \v{S}krekowski~\cite{Sk1}
extended this, independently proving that every planar graph is $3|2$-choosable,
and Cushing and Kierstead~\cite{CuKi} proved that they are $4|1$-choosable.
\v{S}krekowski~\cite{Sk2} proved that triangle-free planar graphs are
$3|1$-choosable.  Toward Steinberg's Conjecture that planar graphs without
cycles of lengths $4$ or $5$ are $3$-colorable, it has been proved that such
graphs are $(1,1,0)$-colorable~\cite{HY,XMW} and
$(3,0,0)$-colorable~\cite{OSWXY} (strengthening~\cite{CHMR}); also they are
$3|1$-choosable~\cite{LSWZ} (see Exercise~\ref{no45-3|1}).  Graphs in the more
general family forbidding only adjacent triangles and $5$-cycles are
$(1,1,1)$-colorable~\cite{Xu}.  Forbidding cycles of lengths $4$ and $6$ also
yields $(3,0,0)$- and $(1,1,0)$-colorings~\cite{XW}.  These results generally
are proved by discharging.

Cowen, Goddard, and Jesurum~\cite{CGJ} proved results on
$(d,\ldots,d)$-colorability of graphs on higher surfaces.  They also showed
that recognizing $(1,1,1)$-colorability or $(d,d)$-colorability is NP-complete,
even for planar graphs.  For lists of size $2$, \v{S}krekowski~\cite{Sk3} proved
that planar graphs with girth at least $g$ are $2|d$-choosable for
$(g,d)\in\{(9,1),(7,2),(6,3),(5,4)\}$.

Glebov and Zambalaeva~\cite{GZ} proved that planar graphs with girth at least
16 are $(0,1)$-colorable, which has been strengthened by recent work toward
finding the best bounds on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ to ensure $(\VEC d1t)$-colorability.
This is another way to use maximum average degree to refine our understanding
of coloring, like the problems posed in Section~\ref{secmad}.  Bounding
${\rm{mad}}(G)$ is successful for $(j,k)$-colorability where bounding degeneracy and
requiring large girth are not: Kostochka and Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il~\cite{KN} proved
that for all $j,k,g\in{\mathbb N}$ there is a $2$-degenerate graph of girth $g$ that is
not $(j,k)$-colorable.

Let $F(j,k)=\sup\{b\colon\, {\rm{mad}}(G)<b$ implies that $G$ is $(j,k)$-colorable$\}$.
Note that $F(0,0)=2$, since forests are $2$-colorable and odd cycles are not.
The result of~\cite{KN} yields $F(j,k)<4$ for all $j$ and $k$, since
${\rm{mad}}(G)<4$ when $G$ is $2$-degenerate.  In~\cite{BIMR1}, $F(j,k)$ was bounded
below using a linear program.

Kurek and Ruci\'nski~\cite{KR} introduced the problem in terms of vertex Ramsey
theory; their results imply $\FR83\le F(1,1)\le \frac{14}5$, and they offered
400,000 (old) Polish zlotys for the exact value.  Borodin, Kostochka, and
Yancey~\cite{BKY} determined $F(1,1)=\frac{14}5$; their result does not extend to
the list context.  For the precise statement, let the {\it potential} of a set
$A\subseteq V(G)$ be $a|A|-b||A||$, where $||A||$ denotes $|E(G[A])|$ and the
coefficients $a$ and $b$ are chosen appropriately.  They proved that if
$7|A|-10||A||\ge0$ for all $A\subseteq V(G)$, then $G$ is $(1,1)$-colorable (see
Exercise~\ref{F11} for sharpness).

Havet and Sereni~\cite{HS} proved
$4-\FR4{k+2}\le F(k,k)\le 4-\frac{2k+4}{k^2+2k+2}$, even for the list version
(for the upper bound, see Exercise~\ref{kkHS}).  More generally, if
${\rm{mad}}(G)<t+\frac{tk}{t+k}$, then $G$ is $t|k$-choosable (for $t\ge2$).  With
Corr\^ea~\cite{CHS}, they conjectured that for sufficiently large $k$, planar
graphs with $\Delta(G)\le 2k+2$ are $(k,k)$-colorable ($K_{2k+3}$ is not
$(k,k)$-colorable).

Now consider $j<k$.  Borodin and Ivanova~\cite{BI0} proved $F(0,1)\ge\FR73$
(improving~\cite{GZ}); Borodin and Kostochka~\cite{BK} determined
$F(0,1)=\frac{12}5$.  More precisely, $G$ is $(0,1)$-colorable if
$6|A|-5||A||\ge-2$ for all $A\subseteq V(G)$ (see Exercise~\ref{F01} for
sharpness).  For triangle-free graphs, Kim, Kostochka, and Zhu~\cite{KKZ}
proved that $G$ is $(0,1)$-colorable when $11|A|-9||A||\ge -4$ for all
$A\subseteq V(G)$, which applies when ${\rm{mad}}(G)\le\frac{22}9$ and thus includes planar
graphs with girth at least $11$ (it is sharp even for girth $5$; see
Exercise~\ref{01tri}).  There are non-$(0,1)$-colorable planar graphs with
girth $9$, but it is unknown whether they exist with girth $10$.

An earlier more general result (weaker for $k=1$) is
$3-\FR2{k+2}\le F(0,k)\le 3-\FR1{k+1}$~\cite{BIMOR} (also
$\frac{10k+22}{3k+9}\le F(1,k)\le \frac{14k}{4k+1}$~\cite{BIMR2}).  Borodin and
Kostochka~\cite{BK} proved $F(j,k)=4-\frac{2k+4}{(j+2)(k+1)}$ for $k\ge2j+2$.
More precisely, $G$ is $(j,k)$-colorable if
$(2k+2-\frac{k+2}{j+1})|A|-(k+1)||A||> -1$ for all $A\subseteq V(G)$, and this is
sharp.  Their result does not cover $F(1,2)$, $F(1,3)$, and $F(2,2)$, and these
remain unknown.

These results use discharging.  To illustrate the method, and in particular
the use of arbitrarily large reducible configurations, we prove the weaker
bound $F(1,1)\ge\FR83$, strengthened to the list context.  This is the bound
from~\cite{HS} and~\cite{KR}; our method is similar to~\cite{HS} but less
general.  As usual, the discharging argument is simpler than the reducibility.

\begin{lemma}\label{lemimprop}
If $\delta(G)=2$ and ${\overline{d}}(G)<\FR83$, then $G$ has two adjacent $2$-vertices,
or some component of the subgraph of $G$ induced by $3$-vertices is a tree
whose incident edges all are incident also to $2$-vertices in $G$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
If $G$ has no such configuration, then let each vertex have initial charge
equal to its degree.  Let $H$ be the subgraph of $G$ induced by the
$3$-vertices in $G$.  Discharge as follows:

\medskip\noindent
(R1) Each $2$-vertex takes $\FR13$ from each neighbor.

\noindent
(R2) Each $3$-vertex takes $\FR13$ from each $4^+$-neighbor.

\noindent
(R3) After (R1) and (R2), the vertices in a component of $H$ share their charge
equally.

\medskip
Since $2$-vertices have no $2$-neighbors, each $2$-vertex ends happy.
A $4^+$-vertex of degree $j$ loses at most $1/3$ to each neighbor and hence
keeps at least $\frac{2j}3$, which is at least $\FR83$.

To study the $3$-vertices, let $S$ be the vertex set of a component of $H$
(see Figure~\ref{figimpd}).  Let $F$ be the set of edges with endpoints in $S$
whose other endpoints are $2$-vertices in $G$.  Since a spanning tree of $H[S]$
has $|S|-1$ edges, and $\SM vS d_G(v)=3|S|$, at most $|S|+2$ edges of $G$
incident to $S$ are not in this tree.  Hence if $|F|\ge|S|+2$, then $H[S]$ is a
tree, and all edges with one endpoint in $S$ are incident to $2$-vertices.
This is the second specified configuration; in the discharging argument, we
assume that this does not occur.

If $|F|\le|S|$, then $S$ has enough charge to send $\FR13$ along each edge in
$F$ while retaining an average of $\FR83$ for each vertex of $S$ (which is then
spread equally).  Hence the vertices of $S$ end happy.  Note that this case is
forced when $H[S]$ is not a tree.

If $|F|=|S|+1$, then $H[S]$ is a tree and some vertex $v\in S$ has a
$4^+$-neighbor $u$.  Since $v$ takes $\FR13$ from $u$, again $S$ has enough
charge.
\end{proof}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.563in
    \rlap{\kern 0.225in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.113in
    \rlap{\kern 0.225in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.338in
    \rlap{\kern 0.675in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.338in
    \rlap{\kern 1.125in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.653in
    \rlap{\kern 1.125in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.013in
    \rlap{\kern 0.675in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.013in
    \rlap{\kern 1.575in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.338in
    \rlap{\kern 1.575in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 675 338}%
    \special{pa 405 473}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 514 448}%
    \special{pa 405 473}%
    \special{pa 490 400}%
    \special{pa 514 448}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 405 473}%
    \special{pa 225 563}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 675 338}%
    \special{pa 405 203}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 490 275}%
    \special{pa 405 203}%
    \special{pa 514 227}%
    \special{pa 490 275}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 405 203}%
    \special{pa 225 113}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1125 653}%
    \special{pa 855 869}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 956 822}%
    \special{pa 855 869}%
    \special{pa 922 780}%
    \special{pa 956 822}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 855 869}%
    \special{pa 675 1013}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1125 653}%
    \special{pa 1395 869}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1328 780}%
    \special{pa 1395 869}%
    \special{pa 1294 822}%
    \special{pa 1328 780}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1395 869}%
    \special{pa 1575 1013}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1575 338}%
    \special{pa 1575 743}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 1602 635}%
    \special{pa 1575 743}%
    \special{pa 1548 635}%
    \special{pa 1602 635}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1575 743}%
    \special{pa 1575 1013}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 1125 338}%
    \special{pa 675 338}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1125 338}%
    \special{pa 1125 653}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1125 338}%
    \special{pa 2025 338}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 225 563}%
    \special{pa 0 563}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 225 113}%
    \special{pa 0 113}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 675 1013}%
    \special{pa 450 1013}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.338in
    \rlap{\kern 2.025in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.788in
    \rlap{\kern 2.115in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.338in
    \rlap{\kern 2.475in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 8}%
    \special{pa 2475 338}%
    \special{pa 2205 338}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2313 365}%
    \special{pa 2205 338}%
    \special{pa 2313 310}%
    \special{pa 2313 365}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2205 338}%
    \special{pa 2025 338}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2025 338}%
    \special{pa 2079 608}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{sh 1.000}%
    \special{pa 2084 496}%
    \special{pa 2079 608}%
    \special{pa 2031 507}%
    \special{pa 2084 496}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2079 608}%
    \special{pa 2115 788}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2475 338}%
    \special{pa 2700 338}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2475 338}%
    \special{pa 2475 113}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2475 338}%
    \special{pa 2475 563}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2115 788}%
    \special{pa 2340 788}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{ar 1350 428 900 360 0 6.28319}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.518in
    \rlap{\kern 1.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $S$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.125in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 2.700in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Discharging for Lemma~\ref{lemimprop}\label{figimpd}}
\end{figure}

\begin{theorem}\label{21choos}
If ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\frac83$, then $G$ is $2|1$-choosable.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let $G$ be a minimal counterexample, with a $2$-uniform list assignment $L$
from which no $1$-improper coloring can be chosen.  We may assume that $G$ is
connected.  If $v$ is a $1$-vertex, then a $1$-improper $L$-coloring of $G-v$
can be extended to $G$ by giving $v$ a color from $L(v)$ not used on its
neighbor.  Hence we may assume $\delta(G)\ge2$.  It now suffices to show that
the configurations in Lemma~\ref{lemimprop} are reducible.

If $G$ contains a $2$-thread $\langle u',u,v,v'\rangle$, then let $G'=G-\{u,v\}$, and
let $\phi$ be a $1$-improper $L$-coloring of $G'$.  Extend $\phi$ to $G$ by
giving $u$ a color in $L(u)-\phi(u')$ and $v$ a color in $L(v)-\phi(v')$; note
that $u$ and $v$ may then have the same color.

Let $H$ be the subgraph of $G$ induced by the $3$-vertices.  It remains to
prove that tree components of $H$ are reducible when each external neighbor has
degree $2$.  For this we prove a stronger claim.  Say that a vertex in a
partial coloring is

\smallskip
{\it solo} if it has a fixed single color not used on any neighbor,

{\it dual} if it is free to have either of two colors and each appears on at
most one neighbor,

{\it empty} if it has no colored neighbor.
\smallskip

\noindent
Colors on dual vertices will be chosen later.

Let $S$ be the vertex set of a tree induced by $3$-vertices in $G$ (not
necessarily a component of $H$; there may be outside $3$-neighbors).  Leaving
$S$ are $|S|+2$ edges.  We prove a claim:

\smallskip
{\narrower
\it
\noindent
If the other endpoints of the edges leaving $S$ are labeled solo/dual/empty
from $1$-improper $L$-colorings of $G-S$, then $G$ has a $1$-improper
$L$-coloring.

}
\smallskip

We use induction on $|S|$.  If $S=\{v\}$, then the colors in $L(v)$ cannot both
be forced to appear on at least two neighbors of $v$ outside $S$, since there
are only three such neighbors.  If a color $c\in L(v)$ is not forced to appear
on $N(v)$, then fix the colors on dual neighbors to avoid $c$ and used $c$ on
$v$ to complete the extension.  If $c$ is forced to appear on one neighbor,
then that vertex is solo and again $c$ can be used on $v$ to complete the
extension.

For $|S|>1$, let $v$ be an endpoint of a longest path in the tree, so $v$ has
two outside labeled neighbors.  Cases on the left in Figure~\ref{fig21ch} show
$v$ having no empty neighbor; on the right $v$ has at least one empty neighbor.
In each case we label $v$ solo (with color fixed) or dual (with color to be
chosen later), and the induction hypothesis completes the extension.

Suppose first that $v$ has no empty neighbor.  If some color $c\in L(v)$ is
not forced to appear on $N(v)$, then make the choices on any dual vertices in
$N(v)$ to avoid $c$, use $c$ on $v$, and label $v$ solo.  If both colors in
$L(v)$ are forced to appear on $N(v)$, then the vertices in $N(v)$ must both be
solo with those colors; label $v$ dual, with color to be chosen later.

If $v$ has one empty neighbor $w$, then color $v$ with a color from $L(v)$
not used on its colored neighbor $u$ (fixing the color of $u$ if $u$ is dual),
color $w$ with a color from $L(w)$ not used on $v$, and label both $v$ and $w$
solo.  If both outside neighbors of $v$ are empty, then color $v$ from $L(v)$
arbitrarily, color the neighbors of $v$ with other colors from their lists,
and label all three vertices solo.  This completes the proof of the claim.

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.512in
    \rlap{\kern 1.958in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.211in
    \rlap{\kern 1.958in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.361in
    \rlap{\kern 2.259in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.361in
    \rlap{\kern 2.560in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.633in
    \rlap{\kern 2.560in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.904in
    \rlap{\kern 2.259in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.904in
    \rlap{\kern 2.861in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.361in
    \rlap{\kern 2.861in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 2259 361}%
    \special{pa 1958 512}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2259 361}%
    \special{pa 1958 211}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2560 633}%
    \special{pa 2259 904}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2560 633}%
    \special{pa 2861 904}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.633in
    \rlap{\kern 2.259in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.512in
    \rlap{\kern 2.259in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\uparrow$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.633in
    \rlap{\kern 2.410in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\to$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.024in
    \rlap{\kern 2.259in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.024in
    \rlap{\kern 2.861in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $w$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.633in
    \rlap{\kern 1.958in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.090in
    \rlap{\kern 1.958in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2861 361}%
    \special{pa 2861 904}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2560 361}%
    \special{pa 2259 361}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2560 361}%
    \special{pa 2560 633}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2560 361}%
    \special{pa 3163 361}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1958 512}%
    \special{pa 1807 512}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1958 211}%
    \special{pa 1807 211}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2259 904}%
    \special{pa 2108 904}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.361in
    \rlap{\kern 3.163in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.753in
    \rlap{\kern 3.223in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.361in
    \rlap{\kern 3.464in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 3464 361}%
    \special{pa 3163 361}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3163 361}%
    \special{pa 3223 753}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3464 361}%
    \special{pa 3464 512}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3223 753}%
    \special{pa 3373 753}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{ar 2711 482 633 301 0 6.28319}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.572in
    \rlap{\kern 2.711in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $S$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.873in
    \rlap{\kern 0.151in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.271in
    \rlap{\kern 0.151in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.572in
    \rlap{\kern 0.452in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 0 873}%
    \special{pa 151 873}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 151 873}%
    \special{pa 452 572}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 452 572}%
    \special{pa 151 271}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 151 271}%
    \special{pa 0 271}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.151in
    \rlap{\kern 0.151in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss s$|$d\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.572in
    \rlap{\kern 0.452in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$~~~s\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.994in
    \rlap{\kern 0.151in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss d\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.753in
    \rlap{\kern 0.151in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.392in
    \rlap{\kern 0.151in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.873in
    \rlap{\kern 1.054in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.271in
    \rlap{\kern 1.054in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.572in
    \rlap{\kern 1.355in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 904 873}%
    \special{pa 1054 873}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1054 873}%
    \special{pa 1355 572}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1355 572}%
    \special{pa 1054 271}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1054 271}%
    \special{pa 904 271}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.151in
    \rlap{\kern 1.054in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss s\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.572in
    \rlap{\kern 1.355in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$~~~d\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.994in
    \rlap{\kern 1.054in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss s\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.753in
    \rlap{\kern 1.054in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.392in
    \rlap{\kern 1.054in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $z$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.271in
    \rlap{\kern 4.066in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.120in
    \rlap{\kern 4.458in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.271in
    \rlap{\kern 4.849in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 3916 271}%
    \special{pa 4066 271}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4066 271}%
    \special{pa 4458 120}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4458 120}%
    \special{pa 4849 271}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4849 271}%
    \special{pa 5000 271}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.151in
    \rlap{\kern 4.066in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.000in
    \rlap{\kern 4.458in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.151in
    \rlap{\kern 4.849in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $w$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.392in
    \rlap{\kern 4.066in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss s$|$d\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.241in
    \rlap{\kern 4.458in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss s\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.392in
    \rlap{\kern 4.849in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss e$\to$s\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.964in
    \rlap{\kern 4.066in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.813in
    \rlap{\kern 4.458in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.964in
    \rlap{\kern 4.849in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 3916 964}%
    \special{pa 4066 964}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4066 964}%
    \special{pa 4458 813}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4458 813}%
    \special{pa 4849 964}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4849 964}%
    \special{pa 5000 964}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.843in
    \rlap{\kern 4.066in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $w'$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.693in
    \rlap{\kern 4.458in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.843in
    \rlap{\kern 4.849in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $w$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.084in
    \rlap{\kern 4.066in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss e$\to$s\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.934in
    \rlap{\kern 4.458in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss s\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.084in
    \rlap{\kern 4.849in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss e$\to$s\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.084in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 5.000in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Induction for components of $H$ in
Theorem~\ref{21choos}\label{fig21ch}}
\end{figure}

\smallskip
To apply the claim, let $S$ be the vertex set of a component of $H$.  Consider
a $1$-improper $L$-coloring $\phi$ of $G-S$.  Each vertex $w$ outside $S$
having a neighbor in $S$ is a $2$-vertex in $G$.  If both neighbors of $w$ lie
in $S$, then label $w$ empty.  Otherwise, $w$ has exactly one neighbor $y$ in
$G-S$, so we may assume $\phi(w)\in L(w)-\phi(y)$ and label $w$ solo.
Now the outside neighbors of $S$ have been labeled, and by the technical claim
$\phi$ can be extended to a $1$-improper $L$-coloring of $G$.
\end{proof}

The subtrees $G[S]$ in Theorem~\ref{21choos} are arbitrarily large reducible
configurations, like the alternating cycles of Lemma~\ref{altcyc} and
$i$-alternating subgraphs in Lemma~\ref{ialt}.  Use of such configurations is
sometimes called ``global discharging''.  The authors of~\cite{BIMOR} expanded
on this notion, introducing ``soft components'' (see Exercise~\ref{soft}) to
describe large reducible configurations.  They also introduced ``feeding areas''
to extend the notion of long-distance discharging (sending charge along
arbitrarily long paths) used in~\cite{BIK} and in~\cite{BHIKW}.  Additional
applications of such ideas appear in~\cite{BIN,BKW,HHLSWZ,Wang,jlw}.  In some
sense, these techniques of global discharging can be viewed as the start of the
``second generation'' of the discharging method, expanding its use to more
difficult problems.

\medskip

{\small

\begin{exercise}\label{kkHS}
(Havet--Sereni~\cite{KS})
The {\it book} $B_r$ is $K_2\copy\dplus \overline{K}_r$, the join\footnote{The notation
$\copy\dplus$ for the join is consistent with the ``Czech notation'' of
Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il for products: the notation pictures the join of $K_2$ with
$K_2$ and yet reflects that the size of the vertex set is additive under join.}
of $K_2$ with $r$ independent vertices (also obtained from $K_{2,r}$ by adding
an edge joining the high-degree vertices).  Form $F_k$ from $k$ disjoint copies
of $B_{k+1}$ by selecting one vertex of degree $k+2$ from each copy and merging
them.  Form the graph $G_{k,n}$ from $2n+1$ copies of $F_k$ by adding a cycle
through the vertices of degree $k(k+2)$ and subdividing all but one edge of the
cycle ($G_{2,1}$ appears in Figure~\ref{figHS}).  Prove that $G_{k,n}$ is not
$(k,k)$-colorable but ${\rm{mad}}(G)=\frac{(2n+1)(4k^2+6k+4)-2}{(2n+1)(k^2+2k+2)-1}$.
Conclude that $F(k,k)<4-\FR4{k+2}$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.438in
    \rlap{\kern 1.250in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.438in
    \rlap{\kern 1.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.438in
    \rlap{\kern 0.750in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.313in
    \rlap{\kern 1.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.188in
    \rlap{\kern 1.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.062in
    \rlap{\kern 1.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.313in
    \rlap{\kern 1.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.188in
    \rlap{\kern 1.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.062in
    \rlap{\kern 1.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 1250 438}%
    \special{pa 1500 313}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 438}%
    \special{pa 1500 188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 438}%
    \special{pa 1500 63}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1750 438}%
    \special{pa 1500 313}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1750 438}%
    \special{pa 1500 188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1750 438}%
    \special{pa 1500 63}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 438}%
    \special{pa 1000 313}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 438}%
    \special{pa 1000 188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1250 438}%
    \special{pa 1000 63}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 438}%
    \special{pa 1000 313}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 438}%
    \special{pa 1000 188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 750 438}%
    \special{pa 1000 63}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1750 438}%
    \special{pa 750 438}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.188in
    \rlap{\kern 2.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.838in
    \rlap{\kern 2.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.538in
    \rlap{\kern 1.650in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.100in
    \rlap{\kern 2.263in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.188in
    \rlap{\kern 2.350in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.275in
    \rlap{\kern 2.438in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.450in
    \rlap{\kern 1.913in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.538in
    \rlap{\kern 2.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.625in
    \rlap{\kern 2.088in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2000 1188}%
    \special{pa 2263 1100}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2000 1188}%
    \special{pa 2350 1188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2000 1188}%
    \special{pa 2438 1275}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2350 838}%
    \special{pa 2263 1100}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2350 838}%
    \special{pa 2350 1188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2350 838}%
    \special{pa 2438 1275}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2000 1188}%
    \special{pa 1913 1450}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2000 1188}%
    \special{pa 2000 1538}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2000 1188}%
    \special{pa 2088 1625}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1650 1538}%
    \special{pa 1913 1450}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1650 1538}%
    \special{pa 2000 1538}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1650 1538}%
    \special{pa 2088 1625}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2350 838}%
    \special{pa 1650 1538}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.188in
    \rlap{\kern 0.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.538in
    \rlap{\kern 0.850in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.838in
    \rlap{\kern 0.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.450in
    \rlap{\kern 0.588in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.538in
    \rlap{\kern 0.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.625in
    \rlap{\kern 0.413in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.100in
    \rlap{\kern 0.238in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.188in
    \rlap{\kern 0.150in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.275in
    \rlap{\kern 0.062in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 500 1188}%
    \special{pa 588 1450}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 500 1188}%
    \special{pa 500 1538}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 500 1188}%
    \special{pa 413 1625}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 850 1538}%
    \special{pa 588 1450}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 850 1538}%
    \special{pa 500 1538}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 850 1538}%
    \special{pa 413 1625}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 500 1188}%
    \special{pa 238 1100}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 500 1188}%
    \special{pa 150 1188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 500 1188}%
    \special{pa 63 1275}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 150 838}%
    \special{pa 238 1100}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 150 838}%
    \special{pa 150 1188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 150 838}%
    \special{pa 63 1275}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 850 1538}%
    \special{pa 150 838}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.813in
    \rlap{\kern 0.875in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.813in
    \rlap{\kern 1.625in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 1250 438}%
    \special{pa 2000 1188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2000 1188}%
    \special{pa 500 1188}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 500 1188}%
    \special{pa 1250 438}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.688in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 2.500in
  }%
}%
}

\vspace{-1pc}

\caption{The non-$(2,2)$-colorable graph $G_{2,1}$ in
Exercise~\ref{kkHS}\label{figHS}}
\end{figure}

\begin{exercise}\label{F01}
(Borodin--Kostochka~\cite{BK})
Prove that the graph on the left in Figure~\ref{figimp} is not
$(0,1)$-colorable.  Generalize to an infinite family of non-$(0,1)$-colorable
graphs $G$ such that $6|V(G)|-5|E(G)|=-3$, thereby proving $F(0,1)\le\frac{12}5$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 0.040in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 0.358in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 0.675in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 0.993in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 1.311in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 1.629in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.516in
    \rlap{\kern 0.199in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.516in
    \rlap{\kern 0.516in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.516in
    \rlap{\kern 1.788in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 675 40}%
    \special{pa 516 516}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 516 516}%
    \special{pa 358 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 358 40}%
    \special{pa 199 516}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 199 516}%
    \special{pa 40 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 40 40}%
    \special{pa 1629 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1629 40}%
    \special{pa 1788 516}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 3.536in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 3.218in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 2.900in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 2.582in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 2.264in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 1.947in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.516in
    \rlap{\kern 3.377in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.516in
    \rlap{\kern 3.059in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.516in
    \rlap{\kern 1.788in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2900 40}%
    \special{pa 3059 516}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3059 516}%
    \special{pa 3218 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3218 40}%
    \special{pa 3377 516}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3377 516}%
    \special{pa 3536 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3536 40}%
    \special{pa 1947 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1947 40}%
    \special{pa 1788 516}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1629 40}%
    \special{pa 1947 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.199in
    \rlap{\kern 4.171in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 4.330in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.199in
    \rlap{\kern 4.489in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.358in
    \rlap{\kern 4.330in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.358in
    \rlap{\kern 4.648in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.358in
    \rlap{\kern 4.966in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.199in
    \rlap{\kern 4.807in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 4.966in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.199in
    \rlap{\kern 5.125in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 4330 40}%
    \special{pa 4330 358}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4330 358}%
    \special{pa 4171 199}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4171 199}%
    \special{pa 4330 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4330 40}%
    \special{pa 4489 199}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4489 199}%
    \special{pa 4330 358}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4330 358}%
    \special{pa 4966 358}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4966 358}%
    \special{pa 4807 199}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4807 199}%
    \special{pa 4966 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4966 40}%
    \special{pa 5125 199}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5125 199}%
    \special{pa 4966 358}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4966 358}%
    \special{pa 4966 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.358in
    \rlap{\kern 5.284in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.358in
    \rlap{\kern 5.601in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.199in
    \rlap{\kern 5.442in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.040in
    \rlap{\kern 5.601in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.199in
    \rlap{\kern 5.760in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.516in
    \rlap{\kern 5.363in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.516in
    \rlap{\kern 4.966in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.516in
    \rlap{\kern 4.568in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 4966 358}%
    \special{pa 5601 358}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5601 358}%
    \special{pa 5442 199}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5442 199}%
    \special{pa 5601 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5601 40}%
    \special{pa 5760 199}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5760 199}%
    \special{pa 5601 358}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5601 358}%
    \special{pa 5601 40}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5601 358}%
    \special{pa 5363 516}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 5363 516}%
    \special{pa 4568 516}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4568 516}%
    \special{pa 4330 358}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4330 358}%
    \special{pa 4966 516}%
    \special{fp}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth0.556in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 5.800in
  }%
}%
}
\caption{Non-$(0,1)$-colorable and non-$(1,1)$-colorable graphs
\label{figimp}}
\end{figure}

\begin{exercise}\label{F11}
(Borodin--Kostochka--Yancey~\cite{BKY})
Prove that the graph on the right in Figure~\ref{figimp} is not
$(1,1)$-colorable.  Generalize to an infinite family of non-$(1,1)$-colorable
graphs $G$ such that $7|V(G)|-5|E(G)|=-1$, thereby proving $F(1,1)\le\frac{14}5$.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{01tri}
(Kim--Kostochka--Zhu~\cite{KKZ})
Let $H$ be the $10$-vertex graph shown on the left in Figure~\ref{fig01tri}.
Let $G$ be the graph in which three copies of $H$ are attached to a $5$-cycle
by first merging the special vertex $v$ with a vertex of the $5$-cycle (as
shown on the right) and then adding paths of length $3$ joining the special
vertices $u$ and $v$ in each copy.  Prove that $G$ is a non-$(0,1)$-colorable
triangle-free graph satisfying $11|V(G)|-9|E(G)|=-5$.  Extend the construction
to obtain an infinite family of graphs with these properties.
\end{exercise}

\vspace{-1pc}

\begin{figure}[h]
\gpic{
\expandafter\ifx\csname graph\endcsname\relax \csname newbox\endcsname\graph\fi
\expandafter\ifx\csname graphtemp\endcsname\relax \csname newdimen\endcsname\graphtemp\fi
\setbox\graph=\vtop{\vskip 0pt\hbox{%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 0.130in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 0.457in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 1.109in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 1.435in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 1.761in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 1.435in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 1.109in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 0.457in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pn 11}%
    \special{pa 130 571}%
    \special{pa 457 897}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 457 897}%
    \special{pa 1109 897}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1109 897}%
    \special{pa 1435 897}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1435 897}%
    \special{pa 1761 571}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1761 571}%
    \special{pa 1435 245}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1435 245}%
    \special{pa 1109 245}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1109 245}%
    \special{pa 457 245}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 457 245}%
    \special{pa 130 571}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 1109 897}%
    \special{pa 1109 245}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 0.783in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 0.783in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 0.000in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 1.891in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 0.946in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $H$\hss}}%
    \special{ar 2739 897 326 98 0 6.28319}%
    \special{ar 2739 245 326 98 0 6.28319}%
    \special{ar 4043 571 326 98 0 6.28319}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 2.413in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 3.065in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 2.413in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 3.065in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 3.717in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 4.370in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 3.391in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 3.391in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 3065 897}%
    \special{pa 3065 245}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3065 245}%
    \special{pa 3391 245}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3391 245}%
    \special{pa 3717 571}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3717 571}%
    \special{pa 3391 897}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3391 897}%
    \special{pa 3065 897}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.929in
    \rlap{\kern 2.739in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $H$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.277in
    \rlap{\kern 2.739in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $H$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.603in
    \rlap{\kern 4.043in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $H$\hss}}%
    \special{pa 2413 897}%
    \special{pa 2543 1060}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2543 1060}%
    \special{pa 2935 1060}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2935 1060}%
    \special{pa 3065 897}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2413 245}%
    \special{pa 2543 82}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2543 82}%
    \special{pa 2935 82}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 2935 82}%
    \special{pa 3065 245}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3717 571}%
    \special{pa 3848 408}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 3848 408}%
    \special{pa 4239 408}%
    \special{fp}%
    \special{pa 4239 408}%
    \special{pa 4370 571}%
    \special{fp}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.897in
    \rlap{\kern 2.283in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.245in
    \rlap{\kern 2.283in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 4.500in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $u$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.805in
    \rlap{\kern 3.157in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.337in
    \rlap{\kern 3.157in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 3.587in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $v$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.571in
    \rlap{\kern 2.739in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $G$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.060in
    \rlap{\kern 2.543in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 1.060in
    \rlap{\kern 2.935in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.082in
    \rlap{\kern 2.543in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.082in
    \rlap{\kern 2.935in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.408in
    \rlap{\kern 3.848in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \graphtemp=.5ex\advance\graphtemp by 0.408in
    \rlap{\kern 4.239in\lower\graphtemp\hbox to 0pt{\hss $\bullet$\hss}}%
    \hbox{\vrule depth1.141in width0pt height 0pt}%
    \kern 4.500in
  }%
}%
}
\vspace{-1pc}

\caption{The non-$(0,1)$-colorable graph $G$ in
Exercise~\ref{01tri}\label{fig01tri}}
\end{figure}

\begin{exercise}
Conclude from Lemma~\ref{gir5dis} that every planar graph with girth at least
$5$ is $2|4$-choosable.
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{no45-3|1}
(Lih et at.~\cite{LSWZ})
Prove that every planar graph with no $4$-cycles or $5$-cycles has a
$2^-$-vertex, two adjacent $3$-vertices, or a triangle whose vertices have
degrees $3,4,4$.  Use this to prove that every planar graph with no $4$-cycles
or $5$-cycles is $3|1$-choosable.  (Comment:~\cite{LSWZ} proves
$3|1$-choosability for planar graphs with with $4$-cycles or $k$-cycles,
where $k\in\{5,6,7\}$, and~\cite{DX} extends this to $k\in\{8,9\}$.)
\end{exercise}

\begin{exercise}\label{soft}
(Borodin et al.~\cite{BIMOR})
For $(1,k)$-colorability, $1^-$-vertices are reducible.  This exercise develops
a family of arbitrarily large reducible configurations; we may assume
$\delta(G)\ge2$.

Say that $(k+1)^-$-vertices are {\it small}, $(k+2)$-vertices are {\it medium},
and $(k+3)^+$-vertices are {\it large}.  A small vertex is {\it weak} if it has exactly one non-small neighbor.  An edge is {\it soft} if it joins a
non-big vertex to a $2$-vertex or a medium vertex to a weak vertex.

And induced subgraph $H$ is a {\it soft component} if it contains no big vertex,
contains every $2$-vertex whose neighbors both lie in $V(H)$, and each edge
$xy$ with $x\in V(H)$ and $y\notin V(H)$ is soft and satisfies
$d_G(x)\ge d_G(y)$.  Prove that soft components are reducible for
$(1,k)$-colorability.
\end{exercise}

}

\section{Further Applications}\label{secmisc}\label{secdecomp}

Discharging has also been used in many other problems.  We briefly describe
several.

\bigskip
{\bf Graph decomposition.}
The basic definitions for graph decomposition appear in
Section~\ref{secrestrict}.3.  Also, say that a graph $G$ is {\it $d$-bounded}
if $\Delta(G)\le d$.  Motivated by an application to ``game coloring number'',
He et al.~\cite{HHLSWZ} introduced the study of decomposing a graph into a
forest and a $d$-bounded subgraph.  Many papers proved such results for planar
graphs under girth restrictions and then for bounded ${\rm{mad}}(G)$.  Montassier et
al.~\cite{MPRWZ} observed that subdividing each edge of a $(2d+2)$-regular
graph yields a graph with average degree $2+\frac{2d}{d+2}$ having no
decomposition into a forest and a $d$-bounded graph.  They asked for the
largest $b$ such that ${\rm{mad}}(G)<b$ is sufficient, showing that
$\frac{2d+4}{d+6+6/d}$ is sufficient.  These results were proved by discharging,
with~\cite{MPRWZ} using pots of charge corresponding to special subgraphs.

Kim et al.~\cite{KKWWZ} proved that the construction in~\cite{MPRWZ} is sharp:
${\rm{mad}}(G)<2+\frac{2d}{d+2}$ guarantees decomposition into a forest and a
$d$-bounded graph.  Although this implies the earlier results for planar graphs
with large girth, it was not proved by discharging.  Instead, a more detailed
statement allowing differing bounds on vertex degrees in the $d$-bounded graph
was proved inductively, using potential functions such as those defined in
Section~\ref{secrestrict}.4.

Montassier et al.~\cite{MORZ} asked what restriction on ${\rm{mad}}(G)$ guarantees a
decomposition into $k+1$ forests, with one required to be $d$-bounded?
Recall from Theorem~\ref{arb} that $G$ decomposes into $k$ forests if and only
if $\CL{{\rm{Arb}}(G)}\le k$, where ${\rm{Arb}}(G)=\max_{H\subseteq G}{\frac{|E(H)|}{|V(H)|-1}}$.
Intuitively, if the {\it fractional arboricity} ${\rm{Arb}}(G)$ just slightly exceeds
$k$, then it should be possible to control the last forest.
The {\it Nine Dragon Tree}\footnote{The Nine Dragon Tree, a banyan tree atop a
mountain in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, is far from acyclic.}
{\it Conjecture}~\cite{MORZ} asserts that if ${\rm{Arb}}(G)\le k+\frac{d}{k+d+1}$, then
$G$ decomposes into $k+1$ forests with one being $d$-bounded.

The conjecture was proved when $k=1$ for $d\le2$ in~\cite{MORZ} and for $d\le6$
in~\cite{KKWWZ}.  These proofs used discharging and potential functions.
When $d>k$,~\cite{KKWWZ} proved that ${\rm{Arb}}(G)\le k+\frac{d}{k+d+1}$ suffices for
decomposability of $G$ into $k$ forests plus one $d$-bounded graph (not
necessarily a forest).  This hypothesis is a bit stronger than
${\rm{mad}}(G)< 2k+\frac{2d}{k+d+1}$.  The result was first proved by discharging, but
the inductive proof of a more detailed statement about potential functions is
much shorter.

For $d\le k+1$, the stronger restriction ${\rm{Arb}}(G)\le k+\frac d{2k+2}$ implies the
conclusion of the NDT Conjecture~(\cite{KKWWZ}).  Since
$\frac d{2k+2}=\frac{d}{k+d+1}$ when $d=k+1$, the NDT Conjecture is thus true in
that case.  The technique here again was inductive.

The {\it Strong NDT Conjecture} asserts that under the same arboricity
restriction, the last forest can also be required to have at most $d$ edges in
each component.  Equivalent to the NDT Conjecture when $d=1$, this has been
proved for $(k,d)=(1,2)$~\cite{KKWWZ}.

When $k=3$, Balogh et al.~\cite{BKPY} proved that every planar graph decomposes
into three forests with one being $8$-bounded (recall Exercise~\ref{planarb}).
They conjectured that $8$ can be improved to $4$, which
Gon\c calves~\cite{Gonc} proved; this does not follow from~\cite{KKWWZ}.
Gon\c calves~\cite{Gonc} also proved that planar graphs with girth at least $g$
decompose into two forests with one being $d$-bounded, for $(g,d)=(6,4)$ or
$(g,d)=(7,2)$; these results do follow from~\cite{KKWWZ}.

\bigskip

{\bf Other graph properties.}
The subject of homomorphism, introduced in Section~\ref{secmad}, includes the
subject of coloring, but in full generality it is not as thoroughly developed.
Nevertheless, there are analogous results.  Dvo\v{r}\'ak, \v{S}krekovski, and
Valla~\cite{DSV} proved that every planar graph $G$ having no odd cycle of
length less than $9$ is $H$-colorable, where $H$ is the Petersen graph (that
is, there is a homomorphism from $G$ to the Petersen graph).  The proof
involves a quite length discharging argument.  Note that being $H$-colorable is
stronger than being $3$-colorable when $H$ is $3$-colorable.

It remains unknown whether $9$ can be improved to $7$.  It cannot be improved
to $5$; the graph obtained from $K_4$ by doubly subdividing the two edges of a
matching is not $H$-colorable.  This graph has average degree $\FR52$; Chen and
Raspaud~\cite{CR10a} proved (again by a substantial discharging argument) that
every triangle-free graph with ${\rm{mad}}(G)<\FR52$ is $H$-colorable.  As a weaker
version of the conjecture that planar graphs with girth at least $4t$ have
circular chromatic number at most $2+\FR1t$, they conjectured that such graphs
have fractional chromatic number at most $2+\FR1t$, and the result
of~\cite{DSV} confirms this for $t=2$.

\medskip

A set $S\subseteq V(G)$ is \emph{dominating} in a graph $G$ if every vertex in
$V(G)\setminus S$ has a neighbor in $S$.  The \emph{domination number}
$\gamma(G)$ is the size of the smallest dominating set in $G$.
Reed~\cite{Reed} proved $\gamma(G)\le \FR38 n$ for every $n$-vertex graph $G$
with $\delta(G)\ge 3$.  The proof assumes a counterexample $G$ and covers $G$
with vertex disjoint paths, subject to various minimality conditions.  The
desired dominating set now consists of roughly every third vertex on each path
(with special attention to the endpoints).

Careful counting of the edges from the endpoints is needed.  Discharging can
provide a convenient language in which to present counting arguments that
involve inequalities.  Kostochka and Stodolsky~\cite{KStod} used this approach
to strengthen Reed's argument, proving that $3$-regular graphs have dominating
sets using at most $\FR4{11}$ of their vertices.  Beginning with charge 1 at
each vertex of a dominating set and charge 0 elsewhere, they redistributed
charge so that each vertex finished with charge at most $\frac{4}{11}$.  By
further developing this discharging approach, Kostochka and
Stocker~\cite{KStock} reduced the ratio to $\FR5{14}$.
\medskip

Discharging has also been used to prove non-local structural properties of
graphs that are sparse by virture of being embedded in surfaces.  For example,
Sanders and Zhao~\cite{SZ98} proved that every graph that embeds in a surface
of Euler characteristic $k$ has a spanning $2$-connected subgraph with maximum
degree at most $10-2k$. For $k \le −10$, they improved this to the best
possible $6-2k$.  The proof is by discharging.

For a graph $G$, the \emph{edge-deck} is the multiset $\{G-e\colon\, e\in E(G)\}$.
A graph $G$ is \emph{edge-reconstructible} if $G$ is uniquely determined by its
edge-deck.  In 1964, Harary conjectured that every graph with at least four
edges is edge-reconstructible.  Zhao~\cite{Z98,Z03} applied discharging to the
special case of Harary's Edge-Reconstruction Conjecture for graphs embedded on
sufaces.  Building on work of Fiorini and Lauri, he proved that if $G$ is a
triangulation of a surface with Euler characteristic $k$ and $|V(G)|\ge -43 k$,
then $G$ is edge-reconstructible.

A ``planar cover'' of a graph $G$ is a homomorphism from a planar graph to
$G$ that maps vertex neighborhoods bijectively.  A number of papers have
applied discharging to Negami's Conjecture that a graph has a finite planar
cover if and only if it embeds in the projective plane; they are surveyed by
Hlin\v{e}n\'y~\cite{H}, who wrote many of them.

\medskip

We also mention some classical graph-theoretic problems not involving coloring
or embeddings on surfaces.  A well-known
conjecture by Thomassen~\cite{T86} asserts that every $4$-connected line graph
is Hamiltonian.  In this direction, Li and Yang~\cite{LY} proved that every
$3$-connected, essentially $10$-connected line graph is Hamiltonian-connected.
Lai, Wang, and Zhan~\cite{LWZ} then gave a proof of this result by discharging.

Belotserkovsky~\cite{Bel} used discharging to determine the minimum number of
edges in a $2$-connected graph with $n$ vertices and diameter at most $d$, when
$n$ is sufficently large: it is $\CL{\frac{dn-2d-1}{d-1}}$.

Let $\nu(G)$ denote the maximum number of pairwise edge-disjoint triangles in
a graph $G$, and let $\tau(G)$ denote the minimum number of edges needed to hit
all the triangles.  Trivially, $\nu(G)\le \tau(G)\le 3\nu(G)$.
Tuza~\cite{Tu1} conjectured that always $\tau(G)\le 2\nu(G)$, which is sharp
for a graph consisting of edge-disjoint copies of $K_4$.  Tuza~\cite{Tu2}
proved the conjecture for planar graphs, and Krivelevich~\cite{Kri} proved it
for all $4$-colorable graphs.  Extending Tuza's result in a different direction,
Puleo~\cite{Pul} used discharging to prove the conjecture whenever ${\rm{mad}}(G)<7$.

\bigskip
{\bf Topological graphs.}
Radoi\v{c}i\'c and T\'oth~\cite{RT} described various uses of discharging in
combinatorial geometry, starting with a short, clever (non-inductive!) proof of
Euler's Formula itself found by Thurston~\cite{Thu}.  They gave an extensive
summary of coloring topics on plane graphs before moving on to discrete
geometry, where they proved a special case of a conjecture of Pach and
Sharir~\cite{PS}: If $H$ is a bipartite graph, then there is a constant $c_H$
such that every $H$-avoiding intersection graph of $n$ convex sets in the plane
has at most $c_H n$ edges, where a graph is $H$-avoiding if it does not contain
$H$.  Radoi\v{c}i\'c and T\'oth used discharging to prove the conjecture for
$H\in\{K_{2,3},C_6\}$.

To motivate their proof, Radoi\v{c}i\'c and T\'oth described the discharging
proof by Ackerman and Tardos~\cite{AT} about the maximum number of edges in
quasi-planar graphs.  A {\it topological graph} is a graph drawn in the plane;
it is a {\it geometric graph} when the edges are drawn as line segments.  A
topological graph is $k$-quasi-planar if it does not have $k$ pairwise crossing
edges.  Thus a $2$-quasi-planar graph is a plane graph, and $3$-quasi-planar
graphs are simply called {\it quasi-planar}.

Capolyeas and Pach~\cite{CP} conjectured for every fixed $k$ that the maximum
number of edges in a $k$-quasi-planar graph on $n$ vertices is linear in $n$.
Agarwal et al.~\cite{AAPRS} proved this for $k=3$, and Ackerman~\cite{Ack}
proved it for $k=4$ (by discharging).  The short discharging proof by
Ackerman and Tardos~\cite{AT} gave a much better bound on the coefficient
for $k=3$: there are at most $8n-20$ edges.  A construction gave a lower bound
of $7n-O(\sqrt{n})$ edges.  They used two rounds of discharging and noted that
stopping after the first round still yields an upper bound of $10n-20$.

The discharging ideas are unusual.  First draw the graph $G$ with the fewest
crossings.  The fact that $G$ is $3$-quasi-planar implies that in the graph
$G'$ obtained by introducing new vertices for the crossings, the new vertices
are all $4$-vertices and every $3$-face contains at least one original vertex.
Assign charge $l(f)-4+v(f)$ to each face $f$ of $G'$, where $v(f)$ denotes the
number of original vertices incident to $f$.  The desire is for each face $f$
to have charge at least $\frac{v(f)}5$, after which the second round proceeds.
The only faces that do not have this much charge are triangles having only one
original vertex $u$.  Such a face $f$ defines a channel between its boundary
edges $e$ and $e'$ that are incident to $u$.  Basically, $f$ takes $\FR15$ from
the first face along this channel that is not a $4$-face having no original
vertices.

Ackerman and Tardos~\cite{AT} also provided a very short discharging proof
that bounds the number of edges of the multigraph $G$ by $19n$, using balanced
charging on $G'$.  In a minimal counterexample, each vertex of $G$ has degree
at least $20$.  Every original vertex sends $\FR45$ to each incident face.
Every $3$-face in $G'$ that has only one original vertex takes $\FR15$ in the
same way as above.  Since $\delta(G)\ge 20$, each vertex remains happy.

Sharir and Welzl~\cite{SW} used discharging to prove that the number of
triangulations (with straight edges) of a set of $n$ points in the plane is at
most ${43}^n$.  Sharir and Sheffer~\cite{SS} refined this approach to improve
the upper bound to ${30}^n$.  For a set $S$ of $n$ points in the plane, their
methods also bound the number of planar straight-line graphs on $S$ in various
classes, including all planar graphs ($207.84^n$), spanning cycles
($O(68.67^n)$), spanning trees ($O(146.69^n)$), and forests ($O(164.17^n)$).

Given a planar $n$-point set $S$, their basic idea is to prove a lower bound on
the average number of $3$-vertices in a uniformly chosen triangulation of $S$.
Their approach is complicated, so we just present a brief sketch; for more
detail, see Sections~2 and 3 of~\cite{SS}.  They show that if the average
number of $3$-vertices in such a triangulation is at least $cn$ for some positive
constant $c$, then the total number of triangulations of $S$ is at most
$c^{-n}$.  To prove a lower bound on the average number of $3$-vertices, each
$4^+$-vertex sends total charge at least 1 to $3$-vertices, and each $3$-vertex
receives charge at most $1/c$.  Much of the work consists of proving an upper
bound on the charge received by each $3$-vertex.  The innovation that allows
this approach to work is sending charge \emph{between triangulations}.  Since
some triangulations have no $3$-vertices, each $4^+$-vertex in such a
triangulation sends charge to $3$-vertices in ``nearby'' triangulations (under
an appropriate edge-flipping metric).