For one thing, Sondland's testimony explicitly and in detail outlined what he described without reservation as a quid pro quo - one focused on an effort to leverage an official White House meeting to pressure Ukraine to announce new investigations. The claim that "no quid pro quo" ever occurred is the opposite of what Sondland testified. It's just that the quid pro quo that Sondland expressly articulated isn't the one that was the subject of that call.
Ngento eyodwa, ubufakazi bukaSondland ngokusobala buveza imininingwane yalokho okuchazwe ngokusobala ukuthi i-quid pro quo - egxile emizamweni yokusebenzisa umhlangano we-White House osemthethweni ukufakela i-Ukraine ingcindezi yokumemezela ngophenyo olusha. Ukuthi "no quid pro quo" kwake kwenzeka kuphambene nalokho okushiwo uSondland lapho efakaza. Wukuthi nje i-quid pro quo yokuthi uSondland waveza ngokusobala akusikho obekuyisihloko ebesidingidwa kulolo cingo.