They further argued that the provisions infringed the right to equality and they were too vague and too susceptible to arbitrary interpretation to deny female children their right to education.
Nítẹ̀síwájú, wọ́n sọ wípé àlàálẹ̀ náà fi ẹ̀tọ́ dídọ́gba ọmọ ènìyàn yí ẹrẹ̀fọ̀ àti pé wọn fi ẹ̀tọ́ àǹfààní sí ẹ̀kọ́ ìwé dun àwọn ọmọdébìnrin.