Through her attorneys, Gyumi argued that the LMA provisions were discriminatory for giving preferential treatment to males in the matter of eligible marriage age.
Ta hanyar lauyoyinta, Gyumi ta yi iƙirararin cewa akwai nuna wariya a cikin dokokin LMA waɗanda suka fifita maza a kan mata a ɓangaren shekarun da kowanne zai iya yin aure.