title: The Puzzle of Modern Economics: Science or Ideology?
author: Roger E. Backhouse
description: "This perceptive guide to the state of conventional economics in the aftermath of the financial crisis shows the subject is neither as flawed as its critics claim nor as powerful as its defenders say. Importantly, Roger Backhouse helps us understand when we can rely on the standard tools of economics. In clearly defined situations, economic models - applied with good judgment - do help tackle real-world problems, but economic techniques are less useful in addressing more complex problems. This is a wise book, one both economists and their critics would do well to read." - Diane Coyle, Author of The Soulful Science: What Economists Really Do and Why It Matters<br /><br />"This beautifully written and extraordinarily insightful book will fascinate anyone interested in macroeconomics, regardless of theoretical or political orientation. Roger Backhouse is one of the few economists in the world with the breadth and depth of knowledge, acuteness of judgment, and intellectual integrity to undertake a systematic and unprejudiced evaluation of the strengths and limitations of modern economics in providing understanding of phenomena ranging from globalization to the recent financial crisis. Academic economists of various stripes will frequently disagree with aspects of Backhouse's analysis but will never fail to be stimulated and sometimes challenged. Lay readers will find the book a rewarding entry into many of the key macroeconomic debates. Simply put, The Puzzle of Modern Economics is an intellectual delight." - Steven N. Durlauf, University of Wisconsin<br /><br />"It is refreshing to find someone who sees the status of modern economics as a puzzle rather than as either a capitalist plot or the triumph of pure reason. Backhouse tries to focus on the intrinsic difficulty of making and applying theories when their object is something as complicated and variable as a modern economy. That is where the action is and where the thought should be." - Robert Solow, Nobel Laureate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br /><br />"This is a tour de force. It presents for the general reader as much as for the specialist a judicious account of why the tribes of economists often reach different conclusions about the same events and offer different prescriptions for the same problems. And it explains why the tribes with a substantially unjustified faith in free markets have long been in the ascendancy, which may now be coming to an end." - Robert Wade, London School of Economics, Recipient of the Leontief Prize in Economics, 2008<br /><br />"Does present-day economics make sense? In a half-dozen well-chosen case studies, Roger Backhouse takes the reader on a tour d'horizon of developments since World War II in order to ask: Is it a.) dangerous mathematical formalism, b.) free market ideology, or c.) a vital guide to practical action? The correct answer, he concludes, is d.) all of the above." - David Warsh, Economic Principals<br /><br />"The more I read Backhouse's book, the more I understood that it's important to distinguish economics from economics as it is typically practiced. Backhouse shows how the current mathematics-heavy top-down approach to economics is not the only one. He traces the origin of the approach--which necessarily assumes that people are rational agents trying to optimize their resources--to the 1930s, but points out that it took some 30 years to really catch on." - Barbara Kiviat, The Curious Capitalist, Time.com<br /><br />"Throughout, Backhouse implements the patient, well-balanced hand of someone familiar with handling intellectual puzzles.... An excellent resource for anyone deciding whether to trust economic knowledge.... Highly recommended." - Choice
zlib_text: ![](images/00001.jpg)
  
  
  ##### www.blackmask.com
  
  * * *
  
  The Preconceptions of Economic Science
  
  
  [ I](The%20Preconceptions%20of%20Economic_split_001.html#filepos1554)
  
  [II](The%20Preconceptions%20of%20Economic_split_001.html#filepos64025)
  
  [III](The%20Preconceptions%20of%20Economic_split_001.html#filepos132635)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  # The Preconceptions of Economic Science
  
  
  ### Thorstein Veblen
  
  
  This page copyright © 2002 Blackmask Online.
  
  
  http://www.blackmask.com  
    
  
  * I
  
  
  * II
  
  
  * III
  
  
  
  
  
  ###  I
  
  
  In an earlier paper(1*) the view has been expressed that the
  
  
  economics handed down by the great writers of a past generation is
  
  
  substantially a taxonomic science. A view of much the same purport, so
  
  
  far as concerns the point here immediately in question, is presented
  
  
  in an admirably lucid and cogent way by Professor Clark in a recent
  
  
  number of this journal.(2*) There is no wish hereby to burden
  
  
  Professor Clark with a putative sponsorship of any ungraceful or
  
  
  questionable genera