   Why are there so many MSDN articles here?
  I was not really sure where to post this, but this section seemed the best.I personally am starting to miss the old days of gamedev, where we had articles that were actually dipping into topics, that were difficult to research..due to the fact is was "new" technology or something unique.It seems like now, there are so many articles that are posted here, where anybody who does a 2 second search on the MSDN librarys can find out the same information..and it is starting to bug me..I plan on partially solving this by writing a unique article here, so do not think I am just bitchin'', I plan to attempt fixing this issue personally.I must give props to the last two articles, The one talking about legality, and also the PS2 development article. But when you start posting code snippets on how to load BMP''s that is where I have to draw the line and have to say something..I like Gamedev and its community..but I find myself coming here less and less, due to the fact that there is no longer any decent information that I can find here..Anyhow just had to rant for a second...and offer some constructive criticism -Lucas 
  I''ve always welcomed criticism, but it seems like in this case, you''re unfairly characterizing many of our articles. Looking at our featured articles for this year, there are really only a few which might fit your criticism. There are definitely a few more if you consider Sweet.Snippets (which aren''t listed on that page), but given the nature of Sweet.Snippets, that''s not completely surprising. Also, I''d like to point out that the response to the bitmap loading article has been almost completely positive.That said, we''re aware that at times the quality level of our articles has been inconsistent, and for that reason we recently established an Editorial Review Board to improve the relevance and accuracy of articles that are posted. You can read more about it on our writers page.Of course, the quality of the articles we post is only as good as the quality of articles we receive, so we welcome submissions from you or anyone else who feels they can improve the quality level. 