challenge: According to the court's decision in Edmonds v Lawson, why was the pupil not considered an apprentice?
  
  A. Because the pupil master could not withhold a practising certificate on any ground not directly related to the pupil's training
  B. Because the pupil was not required to perform any duties not conducive to their own training and development
  C. Because the pupil received a salary for their work
  D. Because the pupil did not provide consideration for the contract
  Answer: 