According to the Supreme Court's decision in Stone v. Powell, what was the reasoning behind not allowing state prisoners to re-hear the exclusionary rule issue via habeas corpus petitions in federal court?

A. The exclusionary rule was only applicable to federal cases, not state cases
B. The exclusionary rule was deemed too complex to be re-heard in federal court
C. The exclusionary rule was considered a fundamental right that outweighed social costs
D. The exclusionary rule was not a personal right, but a deterrent against Fourth Amendment infringement, and had less weight than individual trial rights
Answer: 