what Mr. Yates destroyed was not a document.
question: Was it a document that Mr. Yates destroyed?, context: It does not matter, she said, that what Mr. Yates destroyed was not a document. “A person who hides a murder victim’s body is no less culpable than one who burns the victim’s diary,” she wrote. “A fisherman, like John Yates, who dumps undersized fish to avoid a fine is no less blameworthy than one who shreds his vessel’s catch log for the same reason.” Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas joined Justice Kagan’s dissenting opinion.
Was it a document that Mr. Yates destroyed?
It does not matter, she said, that what Mr. Yates destroyed was not a document. “A person who hides a murder victim’s body is no less culpable than one who burns the victim’s diary,” she wrote.
It does not matter, she said, that what Mr. Yates destroyed was not a document. “A person who hides a murder victim’s body is no less culpable than one who burns the victim’s diary,” she wrote. “A fisherman, like John Yates, who dumps undersized fish to avoid a fine is no less blameworthy than one who shreds his vessel’s catch log for the same reason.” Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas joined Justice Kagan’s dissenting opinion.
It does not matter, she said, that <hl> what Mr. Yates destroyed was not a document. <hl> “A person who hides a murder victim’s body is no less culpable than one who burns the victim’s diary,” she wrote.
It does not matter, she said, that <hl> what Mr. Yates destroyed was not a document. <hl> “A person who hides a murder victim’s body is no less culpable than one who burns the victim’s diary,” she wrote. “A fisherman, like John Yates, who dumps undersized fish to avoid a fine is no less blameworthy than one who shreds his vessel’s catch log for the same reason.” Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas joined Justice Kagan’s dissenting opinion.
<hl> It does not matter, she said, that what Mr. Yates destroyed was not a document. “A person who hides a murder victim’s body is no less culpable than one who burns the victim’s diary,” she wrote. <hl> “A fisherman, like John Yates, who dumps undersized fish to avoid a fine is no less blameworthy than one who shreds his vessel’s catch log for the same reason.” Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas joined Justice Kagan’s dissenting opinion.