INTRODUCTION
============

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for patients with heart failure (HF) and ventricular dyssynchrony who are symptomatic despite optimal medical treatment \[[@R1],[@R2]\]. In selected groups of HF patients, CRT reduces complications and mortality \[[@R3]-[@R5]\], decreases clinical symptoms and improves quality of life (QoL) \[[@R5]-[@R9]\]. A number of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery suffer from HF and ventricular dyssynchrony, and are consequently considered as candidates for a CRT system. The surgical setting enables epicardial pacing lead placement. The surgical technique results in more successful left lead positioning, same level of clinical improvement, lower left ventricular (LV) related complication rates and lower chronic threshold-capture compared to transvenous lead placement *via* the coronary sinus \[[@R10],[@R11]\]. Perioperative CRT-implantation in CABG patients seems to carry a positive effect on functional status and QoL in addition to the outcome of surgery \[[@R12],[@R13]\]. The information available on concomitant CRT-implantation in association with cardiac surgery is, however, limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate health related QoL in patients with HF andventricular dyssynchrony receiving a permanent epicardial CRT system during CABG and/or AVR.

MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY
========================

This study included patients who underwent CABG, AVR or a combined surgical procedure at the University Hospital of Uppsala, Sweden, between December 2004 and December 2007, meeting the standard criteria for CRT treatment at the time of surgery (sinus rhythm, HF with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% and QRS duration ≥120 ms or mechanical dyssynchrony on Doppler echocardiography). They were compared to a matched population of patients with reduced LV function (LVEF\<45%) undergoing cardiac surgery at the same time. Isolated CABG patients were matched with two controls while patients who underwent AVR surgery or combined procedures were matched with one control each, due to the scarcity of appropriate controls. Based on preoperative echocardiography, LVEF was classified as "reduced" (31% to 45%), "severely reduced" (15% to 30%) or "poor" (\<15%). Subdivision into NYHA class IIIA and IIIB was used, with class IIIA including patients who experienced slight discomfort during normal activities, but able to walk a mile on a flat surface at their own speed and climb stairs slowly without undue discomfort \[[@R14]\]. The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Quality of Life Assessment
--------------------------

The SF-36 is a self-administration questionnaire designed for assessment of health related QoL \[[@R15]\]. It consists of 36 items divided into 8 subscales of health that can be summarized into two main health dimensions: Physical Health Score (PCS) and Mental Health Score (MCS) \[[@R16]\]. The SF-36 has been used in a wide range of studies, and normative data on QoL in the general Swedish population have been published \[[@R17]\].

Surgical Techniques
-------------------

All patients underwent CABG and/or AVR surgery according to the clinic's routines. The AVR patients received either biological or mechanical valve prosthesis. The CRT group received three permanent epicardial pacing leads and a CRT device during the procedure. The atrial lead was placed on the right atrial wall, between the sinus node and the appendage. The right ventricular lead was implanted on the inferior wall of the right ventricle and the LV lead on the lateral wall of the left ventricle. All three leads were connected to a CRT device placed subcutaneously below the left clavicle and activated during surgery. We used Medtronic CapSure Epi^®^ unipolar and bipolar epicardial leads (4965 and 4968, respectively). The CRT device was Medtronic InSync III^®^ CRT-P in 21 patients, St Jude Medical Frontier II^®^ CRT-P in three patients and St Jude Medical Atlas^®^ CRT-D in one patient. One patient with a previously implanted dual-chamber pacemaker due to a total atrioventricular block received an epicardial LV lead during surgery and the original pacemaker was replaced with a CRT device. In the last two patients, the transvenous leads St Jude Medical Tendril^®^ 1788T, 1636T, 1688T and Riata^®^ Defibrillation Lead 1571 were used in addition to the epicardial LV lead.

Follow-up
---------

Technical parameters were supervised during routine visits at pacemaker policlinics. At follow-up, the SF-36 (Swedish standard version) was sent to the CRT group and the comparison group. Non-responders received a reminder after four weeks. Incomplete forms were followed up with a telephone call, when possible.

Statistical Analysis
--------------------

Statistical analyses were performed with Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft, Inc, Tulsa, OK, USA). Data are presented as mean ± SD, unless otherwise stated. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between the groups. P values \<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS
=======

Thirty patients received a CRT system. Twenty-eight patients were alive at the time of follow-up (median 27 months; range 8 to 44). During the same period, 78 patients with reduced LV function (LVEF \<45%) without indication for CRT underwent cardiac surgery; 61 of these patients being alive at follow-up (median 32 months; range 10 to 43). The surviving patients were matched for age, main diagnosis and type of surgical procedure to the surviving patients in the CRT group, resulting in 37 patients appropriate for comparison. Patient flow is described in Fig. (**[1](#F1){ref-type="fig"}**). Baseline patient characteristics are presented in Table **[1](#T1){ref-type="table"}**. The technical parameters of the epicardial leads during the follow-up period were adequate, with median LV lead pacing thresholds 0.5 V at 0.4 ms. At three and six months after implantation, the average ventricular pacing percentage was 97% and 99%, respectively. The response rate to the SF-36 was 89% (25 of 28 patients) in the CRT group and 92% (34 of 37) in the comparison group.

Two of the thirty CRT patients (6.7%) had died at follow-up compared to 17 of 78 (22%) patients with depressed LV function but without CRT, see Fig. (**[1](#F1){ref-type="fig"}**). There were no early deaths (≤ 30 days after surgery) among the CRT patients and ten early deaths in the comparison group (*p*=0.04).

Quality of life
---------------

The eight subscales of the SF-36 indicated similar levels of QoL after surgery in the CRT group and the comparison group (Table **[2](#T2){ref-type="table"}**). With the scores summarized into the two main dimensions of health the CRT group showed a similar Physical Health Score but a higher Mental Health Score (Table **[2](#T2){ref-type="table"}**). Within the CRT group, no difference in QoL could be detected between patients with typical left bundle branch block (n=10; PCS 46±11; MCS 51±11) and patients with other indications for CRT (n=15; PCS 41±9; MCS 49±12), PCS *p*=0.2; MCS *p*=0.6.

Compared to the general Swedish population the CRT group scored lower in the summarized Physical Health Score, as well as some of the SF-36 subscales considered as predominantly physical (Table **[2](#T2){ref-type="table"}**). The summarized Mental Health Score and scores in the majority of the SF-36 subscales associated with mental health did not differ between the CRT group and the general Swedish population.

DISCUSSION
==========

The main finding of this study was that in HF patients with ventricular dyssynchrony undergoing CABG and/or AVR surgery, concomitant CRT did not result in a higher estimated QoL compared to patients with reduced LV function not eligible for CRT. In contrast, a limited number of other studies have shown a beneficial effect of CRT and epicardial leads placed in association to cardiac surgery. In a small study on CRT with epicardial leads during CABG in patients with HF \[[@R12]\], a better estimated QoL was seen in patients with active CRT. Similarly, CRT improved QoL and LV systolic function after CABG in HF patients with ventricular dyssynchrony \[[@R13]\].

Our CRT group included a higher percentage of patients initially in NYHA-class IIIB (80%) compared to the comparison group (35 %). It would therefore be reasonable to expect a lower resulting QoL score in the CRT group. We did not detect any adverse effect of CRT on QoL. The implantation and subsequent follow-up of the CRT device were well tolerated and did not significantly affect the scores reflecting the mental and physical well-being of the patients. The difference in the initial condition might have been opposed by a hidden beneficial effect of CRT.

Interestingly, the mortality in the CRT group was lower after surgery than in the matched comparison group. For early deaths this difference was significant. CRT concomitant with CABG has previously been associated with low mortality 18 months after surgery \[[@R13]\]. The beneficial effect of CRT may thus be most apparent early in the postoperative period and loose significance later in the course, as reflected in our QoL measurements more than two years after surgery.

The estimated statistical power to detect a difference in mean PCS (or MCS) of 7 units is 76% in a reasonable model of present setting (mean PCS values 43 and 50, SD 10, current sample sizes, two-tailed test, probability of alpha error 5%). Such an additional effect of CRT on QoL after the operation is therefore improbable. The statistical power to detect a difference of 4 units (mean PCS 43 and 47) decreases to 33%. An effect of this smaller magnitude may thus be present, but undetected.

The summarized Mental Health Score was significantly higher in the CRT group and in range with the general Swedish population, assessed nearly four years after surgery. None of the four subscales concerned with mental health, however, differed. The reason is unclear for a higher reported Mental Health Score in the CRT group. A placebo effect might be a possible explanation. As described by Mandeep *et al*, CRT can exert a substantial placebo effect with improved QoL parameters \[[@R18]\].

Implantation of a permanent CRT system during cardiac surgery is a relatively small additional procedure. We did not detect any negative influence on QoL from CRT. Other authors have reported positive findings \[[@R12],[@R13]\] and CRT may have a role in the treatment in selected patients with HF and ventricular dyssynchrony undergoing CABG and/or AVR surgery.

Limitations
-----------

This was a nonrandomized retrospective study on a relatively small population and the limited number of patients suitable for comparison restricted the matching process. The comparison group did not fulfill the CRT criteria, although the LV function was depressed to a similar degree. This may have affected the comparison results. No baseline data for QoL was available and individual patient differences in QoL were not possible to assess.

CONCLUSION
==========

Concomitant CRT for HF patients with ventricular dyssynchrony undergoing CABG and/or AVR did not result in a higher estimated QoL compared to HF patients without CRT. Further studies are needed to draw conclusions about the possible long-term benefits of CRT in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Declared none.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
====================

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest.

![Patient flow.](TOCMJ-8-18_F1){#F1}

###### 

Characteristics and Surgical Data of Responder to SF-36

  Variable                         CRT Group          Comparison Group   *p*
  -------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------ ---------
  Age (y), median (range)          72 (55-86)         70 (46-86)         0.20
  Male sex                         22 (88)            29 (85)            \>0.3
  Hypertension                     19 (79)            26 (76)            \>0.3
  Diabetes                         2 (8.3)            10 (29)            0.03
  Ischemic heart disease           13 (54)            23 (68)            0.23
  S-Creatinine, median (range)     100 (57-165)       97 (60-133)        \>0.3
  Nt-proBNP, median (range)        2407 (572-27549)   1483 (99-16923)    0.12
  History of atrial fibrillation   8 (33)             4 (8.8)            0.06
  LBBB                             10 (40)            1 (2.9)            \<0.001
  QRS width (ms), median (range)   138 (94-200)       107 (82-178)       \<0.001
  LVEF                                                                   0.24
  Reduced (31-45%)                 1 (4.2)            5 (15)              
  Severely reduced (15-30%)        22 (88)            27 (79)             
  Poor (\<15%)                     2 (8.3)            2 (5.9)             
  NYHA class                                                             \<0.001
  I-II                             0 (0)              6 (18)              
  IIIA                             5 (20)             16 (47)             
  IIIB                             20 (80)            12 (35)             
  Procedure                                                              0.11
  CABG                             8 (32)             18 (53)             
  AVR ± CABG                       17 (68)            16 (47)             

Data shown as numbers (percentages within group) unless otherwise stated. AVR = aortic valve replacement; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy; LBBB = left bundle branch block; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA class = New York Heart Association functional classification.

###### 

Quality of Life After Cardiac Surgery with and Without Concomitant CRT, and in a Sample of the General Swedish Population

  SF-36 Variable               CRT Group (n=25)   Comparison Group (n=34)   *p^a^*   Swedish Population   *p^b^*
  ---------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------- -------- -------------------- ---------
  Physical functioning         65.9 ± 21.8        69.1 ± 26.3               \>0.3    87.9 ± 19.6          \<0.001
  Role limitation, physical    49.0 ± 46.5        53.7 ± 43.6               \>0.3    83.2 ±31.8           \<0.001
  Bodily pain                  80.2 ± 21.6        79.8 ± 27.9               \>0.3    74.8 ± 26.1          0.3
  General health               71.0 ± 17.7        65.3 ± 22.3               \>0.3    75.8 ± 22.2          0.3
  Vitality                     69.0 ± 19.4        58.7 ± 25.7               0.1      68.8 ± 22.8          \>0.3
  Social functioning           89.1 ± 18.2        76.5 ± 27.8               0.1      88.6 ± 20.3          \>0.3
  Role limitation, emotional   54.7 ± 47.0        53.5 ± 44.8               \>0.3    85.7 ± 29.2          \<0.001
  Mental health                83.5 ±17.2         73.4 ± 21.7               0.1      80.9 ±18.9           \>0.3
  Physical health score        42.9 ± 9.9         45.7 ± 11.3               0.3      50.0 ± 9.7           \<0.001
  Mental health score          50.0 ± 11.5        43.5 ± 12.2               0.04     50.0 ± 10.3          \>0.3

Data shown as mean (±SD). ^a^SF-36 scores in the CRT group vs the comparison group. ^b^SF-36 scores in the CRT group vs the general Swedish population (n=8004; 15-80 years; 48% male). CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy.
