Today much of the world's population lives safer, more comfortable, healthier, longer, more productive lives than ever before. And yet, around half of the global population currently lacks access to enough electricity, and 1.2bn people have no access at all. #IPCC 1/n

Global electricity access is rising, which is improving the lives of millions. But this means our decarbonisation challenge is even greater, since we not only have to replace our entire fossil fuel infrastructure, but probably double it to meet rising global energy demand. #IPCC

The question is where will this energy to come from? A: Right now, mainly from #coal. #IPCC

Despite 25yrs of successfully building political and public support for action on #climatechange we have not made a dent in the upward trajectory of emissions, and fossil fuels still dominate the global #energy mix. #IPCC

This has to change. By 2050 we need to reduce CO2 emissions to net zero globally around 2050, or face severe, irreversible consequences. #IPCC

By 2050, my daughter will be the age that I am now. This throws the net zero deadline into sharp relief. I want to be able to look my daughter in the eye and tell her there was no solution that I did not consider in the battle against climate change. #IPCC

Because it's bad people. Already. Already ice shelves the size of Manhattan Island are breaking away from the crumbling coastal shelf as the air and sea warm.

Other likely effects include more frequent extreme weather events such as heat waves, droughts, heavy rainfall with floods, ocean acidification and potentially a catastrophic mass species extinction by the end of the century. #IPCCReport

Effects on humans include the threat to food security from decreasing crop yields, forced migration, conflict, and the abandonment of populated areas due to rising sea levels. #IPCCReport

The scale and complexity of global warming, and it’s causes and impacts are so large, we don’t really have the mental apparatus to respond to an abstract problem like climate change. It's not a threat we are evolved to respond to, like a tiger coming to our village. #IPCC

Climate is a cumulative problem. We cannot wait until it’s got bad, say ok it’s bad now let’s solve it. Then it will be too late. Because the climate system has a large inertia and effects will persist for not only decades or centuries, but for thousands of years to come. #IPCC

However, as the late, great Prof Sir David MacKay said: "the climate problem is mostly an energy problem". Solving climate change can be boiled down to a simple two step strategy: Clean up electricity generation, and then electrify everything (as efficiently as possible) #IPCC

All credible studies have concluded that to have a serious chance of (1.5C) success, we need all the low-carbon solutions we have available to us and, given the scale and urgency, should be pursuing the fastest, most cost effective most feasible pathways to decarbonise. #IPCC

Our Climate Leadership report published at COP 23 with @tmrowco showed those countries in Europe who are climate leaders have the lowest carbon intensity. They are shown in bright green here on the map. They achieved this largely through a combination of #nuclear and #renewables.

In 5 years (2010-15) U.K. achieved the largest overall reduction in carbon emissions in Europe thanks to a combination of nuclear, renewables, and gas to replace #coal. By contrast, Germany proves that it is not possible to exit coal and nuclear at the same time. #IPCC

Our study demonstrated that there is no correlation between high installed capacity of renewables and low carbon intensity. Overall carbon intensity performance of the whole system is what counts – not individual technologies. Carbon intensity, not installed capacity. #IPCC

So, an energy system running a mix of nuclear and renewables performs well on reliability, affordability and decarbonisation. So far so good. But nuclear keeps being counted out because it is too expensive and slow. Right? #IPCC

Right. Recent experience in US and Europe has been expensive and slow. So how are nuclear projects being built elsewhere today for 50 - 80% lower cost?
We investigated this question in our recent Study on Nuclear Cost Drivers, commissioned by @the_ETI . eti.co.uk/news/cost-driv…

We found that the price gap – seen here btw EU/US & Rest of World is due to best in class industrial practice, labour productivity and a strategy to build the same design repeatedly, while maximizing learning between units.
Nuclear CAN be expensive, but it does not have to be.

We have built out zero carbon infrastructure at scale in EU/US before too.We have decarbonised modern electricity grids – supporting economic growth and maintaining reliability. By learning from the example set today especially by colleagues in China & Korea. We can do it again.

We can also learn from the success of the offshore wind industry: collaboration; cost and risk sharing between Catapults; and determination from supply chains and developers will be critical: to tackle construction delay; cost over-runs; slow build rate; and high financing costs.

What is needed is not so much technical innovation, but industrial transformation; coupled with a laser-like focus on accelerating commercialisation and deployment at scale for multiple applications beyond the power sector including high temperature heat for industrial processes.

Beyond the power sector, we need decarbonisation across transport, heat, buildings, industry and other sectors. Whether high temperature heat, or the manufacture of synthetic fuels, these are grand challenges for which we need vision and leadership. #IPCC

By 2050, even if we manage to stem the worst effects of climate, my daughter will be part of a larger global population more exposed to extreme weather and frequent natural disasters. Resilient infrastructure will be needed that is more versatile, scalable, flexible & competitive

We are at a watershed moment in protecting Earth’s climate. Our response to climate change today will have far-reaching implications for all of our children. We must choose our path wisely if we are to succeed globally in making a rapid and meaningful transition from fossil fuels

Related hashtags

Related threads

Starting this with the obvious...Fake News is ingrained and has been for a very time. Many ask, how to tell the difference. Emotion is NOT news, truth is and is fact, facts are not emotional. Many of us have lost life long friends over this, together we are not isolated WWG1WGA

No matter what you're looking at, ask yourself basic questions to ensure you have the whole story...Who, What, Where, When and Why thereby completely explaining the How? Questioning forces you to reason through what you see. You can do this, you are capable, believe in yourself.

Following the 5-Ws advice certainly helps when shtuff like this hits the "news"... where with yet another shooter connected to ANTIFA/Nazi movement. How does this keep happening? We are asking the wrong questions... Asking the 5-Ws prove the how so we can ultimately end the evil.

2) A quick background: Peter Paul Strzok II (FBI) has a father named Peter Paul Strzok who was born in 1933. We know he was in the Army Corp of Engineers - Catholic Relief Services - President of a non profit (AFRGO) and has worked all over the world. See Thread 1 for more 🔝

3) In 1991 - Just before getting a contract with USAID for Disaster Relief in Iraq --- Peter Strzok (the father) started a company based in "Minnesota" called "MINAFCO, INC." VERY LITTLE INFO ON THIS COMPANY. I believe changed address to WI in 2002.

Dad was detained in a #Texas detention center where @RAICESTEXAS consulted. Dad accepted a deportation to be quickly reunited w/ his infant child. However, the Dad was deported & NOT his child. The now 8-month-old baby has been in ORR custody for 4 months. #EndFamilySeparation