Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I.The District Court erred in denying Feist's motion to withdraw his guilty plea after it rejected his binding plea agreement.
II.The District Court abused its discretion in denying Feist's motion to withdraw his guilty plea, resulting in a manifest injustice.
III. The State impermissibly deviated from the sentence recommendation it promised Feist.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Feist's Motion to withdraw his guilty plea in 04-K-01498?
II. Whether the state impermissibly deviated from its sentencing recommendation?