Re: Concurrency in an RDB

> Marshall wrote:>> > On Dec 14, 3:22 pm, "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:> >> >>I have never stated that locks put on objects can not cause deadlocks> >>to happen.> >> > So your position is:> >> > 1) There is NO direct relationship between locks and deadlocks.> > 2) Locks put on objects can cause deadlocks.> >> > Well. The More You Know.

> >>A lock is a normal mechanism and is not the real> >>cause of the deadlock problem which lies more on the IO/disk swapping> >>contention of ressources. A matter of perspective, idiots like> >>Marshall will probably not perceive in a lifetime.> >> > Deadlock is caused by disk swapping, you say? You are> > right; I do not see me being able to perceive this any> > time soon.>> Not even with the Romper Room magic looking glass! I see Cimode! And> Neo! And...

Youhou!!! I am happy I could be of any help !!!
Received on Fri Dec 15 2006 - 03:24:30 CST