
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="utf-8" />
            
    <title>No device type found - UserAgentApiCom &lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</title>
        
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/materialize/0.97.3/css/materialize.min.css">
    <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/icon?family=Material+Icons" rel="stylesheet">
    <link href="../circle.css" rel="stylesheet">
</head>
        
<body>
<div class="container">
    
<div class="section">
    <h1 class="header center orange-text">No device type found - UserAgentApiCom <small></small></h1>
        
    <div class="row center">
        1 result(s) found
    </div>
</div>
        
<div class="section" id="simple-list">
    <form>
        <div class="input-field">
          <input class="search" type="search" placeholder="Search for a user agent">
          <i class="material-icons">close</i>
        </div>
            
        <a class="sort btn" data-sort="name">Sort by name</a>
        <a class="sort btn" data-sort="detectionCount">Sort by detection count</a>
            
    </form>
            
    <ul class="list collection"><li class="collection-item"><h4 class="searchable"><span class="name"></span> <small class="detectionCount">3x detected</small> <small class="detectionCountUnique">(2x unique)</small><br /><small class="detectionValuesDistinct">Mobile Device,software-library</small></h4><strong>Example user agent</strong><br /><span><a href="../../user-agent-detail/b7/8d/b78daa58-4e98-439a-8520-43392bb0c44a.html" class="userAgent">Mozilla/5.0 (iOS; U; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) AdobeAIR/13.0</a></span></li></ul>
</div>

        
    <div class="section">
        <h1 class="header center orange-text">About this comparison</h1>
    
        <div class="row center">
            <h5 class="header light">
                The primary goal of this project is simple<br />
        
                I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...<br />
                <br />
                The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.<br />
                <br />
                You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at <a href="https://github.com/ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison">ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison</a><br />
                <br />
                The comparison is based on the abstraction by <a href="https://github.com/ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser">ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser</a>
            </h5>
        </div>
            
    </div>
        
    <div class="card">
		<div class="card-content">
			Comparison created <i>2016-05-17 07:46:40</i> | by 
            <a href="https://github.com/ThaDafinser">ThaDafinser</a>
        </div>
    </div>
			    
</div>
			    
    <script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.1.4.min.js"></script>
    <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/materialize/0.97.3/js/materialize.min.js"></script>
    <script src="http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/list.js/1.2.0/list.min.js"></script>
        
    <script>
    
var options = {
    page: 50000,
    valueNames: [
        'name',
        'detectionCount',
        'userAgent'
    ]
};

var hackerList = new List('simple-list', options);    

    </script>
        
</body>
</html>