G.O.P. Campaign Tactics Reveal True Character

Today, that question applies not to their rigidly right-wing ideology, nor to their routine betrayal of their rigidly right-wing ideology, nor even to their weird sexual hang-ups and hypocrisy, fascinating as all of those topics may be. Instead, on the day after Election Day, what is at issue is the bad nature of the Republican political class—meaning the party officials, the consultants, and the elected officials who oversee both—and the poisoning of America’s democratic process by their habitual misconduct.

Republicans tend to talk about honor, integrity, morality and character in almost mystical terms, often attributing those qualities to themselves and their leaders. But the daily behavior of those who maintain the party’s power shows how irrelevant those concepts have become in reality.

The 2006 midterm elections concluded in a barrage of slanderous advertising, deceptive automated telephone calls, and attempted voter intimidation designed to discourage participation. Reporting on these ugly incidents, mainstream journalists feel compelled to pretend that both parties are guilty in equal measure. If and when an honest postmortem is completed, the results will demonstrate that the Grand Old Party, as it once deserved to be known, was responsible for the worst excesses, with very few exceptions.

Howard Kurtz, the excruciatingly even-handed media reporter for CNN and The Washington Post, recently complained that “this year is the worst I’ve seen in terms of smarmy and sleazy [TV] spots” that distort facts in order to smear an opponent, while insulting the intelligence of voters and drowning out decent discourse. Who did he hold responsible for this disgraceful dumbing-down of the electoral debate? “Over the years, both parties have dished out their share of the negative stuff,” wrote Mr. Kurtz, “but this year, most of the truly awful and factually challenged commercials have been on the Republican side.”

Such desperately negative advertising may just be a seasonal liability that has grown worse over the years, like storms and heat waves intensified by global climate change. Ads are subject to discounting by viewers and disputing by opponents, and even to checking by the media. This year’s sleaziest tricks, however, were played on the telephone, not the television, using the device of “robo-calling.” The technology of automated dialing and recorded messages can be used for a variety of scummy tactics, from jamming Democratic phone banks and smearing Democratic candidates to harassing or intimidating potential Democratic voters.

The latest version, which was reported around the country in the days leading up to Nov. 7, involved a Republican deception designed to make voters think they were receiving repeated, annoying calls from a Democratic campaign. In suburban Chicago, for example, the automated message heard by those who picked up the receiver began: “Hi, I’m calling with information about Tammy Duckworth,” the brave Democratic Congressional candidate and Army veteran who lost her legs in Iraq.

People who listened to the rest of that recording heard various slurs against Ms. Duckworth; those who hung up would think that her campaign had called—and then called and called, over and over, unless they listened to the entire message.

This same dubious tactic was used in an untold number of Congressional districts. Only at the very end of the call was the real sponsor identified: the National Republican Congressional Committee.

Another robo-call scam was used in Virginia (and no doubt elsewhere), with legally registered voters receiving automated calls that warned they had violated election laws—and might be arrested if they showed up to vote. And on Election Day 2006, right-wing radio yakker Laura Ingraham gleefully encouraged her listeners to jam a Democratic Party voter helpline.

This wave of vandalism can be traced back to a case in New Hampshire that resulted in criminal prosecution. Last year, federal authorities convicted Republican operatives of running a phone-jamming scheme on Election Day 2002, in a bid to disable Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts and rig the last midterm election. Among those who executed the scheme was one James Tobin, then regional director of the Republican National Committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee, who later chaired Bush-Cheney 2004 in New England until he was forced to step down. The R.N.C. reportedly paid $3 million to finance his defense—and he kept his mouth shut about the party bosses in the White House, with whom he’d had many, many conversations as he carried out his conspiracy. Although Mr. Tobin was sentenced to 10 months in prison, his former supervisor, Terry Nelson, is still at large and is currently in charge of R.N.C. opposition research.

Actually, the pedigree of thuggery is embodied in Karl Rove, the boss of all Republican bosses, who learned the dark art of dirty tricks from the Nixon gang. The responsible Republicans never purged that spirit, which brought them to power and corrupted their souls.