Introduction
============

Soil contamination resulting from uncontrolled dumping of municipal, industrial, and agricultural solid waste, as well as hazardous waste such as e-waste, has become a public health concern in Nigeria.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b1] Of particular concern is soil contamination at informal electronic waste recycling and disposal sites. In Nigeria, domestic and imported e-waste streams are growing steadily due to the increased availability of secondhand computers used in computer training centers, printing houses, cyber cafes, business centres and homes. Researchers have estimated that, on average, 500 shipping containers, with 400,000 computer monitors or 175,000 large TV sets enter the port of Lagos, Nigeria per year. As much as 75% of this waste is unserviceable and unable to be refurbished, and thus becomes e-waste.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b7]

In addition to precious metals such as gold, silver, and platinum, e-waste contains toxic metals such as lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b11] Informal e-waste recycling and disposal practices such as open burning and dumping can lead to leaching of these toxic metals into the soil. Humans can be exposed to soil contaminants from e-waste dumpsites through accidental soil ingestion or direct dermal exposure.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b12] Lead levels in dust have been significantly associated with Pb levels in children\'s blood, and a blood lead level greater than 10 μg Pb/dL has been associated with a decrease in intelligence quotient (IQ).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b22],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b23] Exposure to high levels of heavy metals such as Pb, Cd, and Hg through ingestion and dermal contact can result in acute and chronic toxicity. These metals can damage the central and peripheral nervous systems, result in blood abnormalities, impair the lungs, kidneys, and liver, and even lead to death. The health and environmental effects of individual metals vary from toxic to endocrine disruption.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b24] Elevated metals concentrations in surface soils can pose a risk to human health.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b28] Heavy metals can migrate from surface soil to subsoil and contaminate ground water. They can also bio-accumulate in the food chain, posing health risks at high concentrations.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, another class of toxic chemicals, are released by low-temperature combustion of e-waste.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b19],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b29],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b30] Although limited data exist on the distribution and transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from e-waste dumpsites in Nigeria, PAHs are known to be lipophilic and accumulate in the food chain near contaminated sites.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b20],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b31] Their lipophilicity also makes dermal absorption possible. Epidemiological studies on occupational exposure to PAHs indicate that they can contribute to induction of skin and lung cancers. It has been reported that certain PAH metabolites interact with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and are genotoxic, causing malignancies and heritable genetic damage in humans.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b38] The lower molecular weight PAHs (e.g., 2--3 rings) such as naphthalene, fluorene, phenanthrene and anthracene have significant acute toxicity to aquatic organisms, while higher molecular weight PAHs (4--7 rings) such as chrysene and coronene do not, but are carcinogenic.

This study assesses the distribution and levels of toxic metals and PAHs in the soil of selected e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan, Nigeria, where open burning is prevalent. Data of this nature are currently lacking for Nigeria, and understanding local contaminant levels is important for effective health risk assessment. We also estimated human and ecological health risks using the pollution load index and ecological risk index, using our soil concentration data as inputs.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b39],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b40] A secondary objective was to determine contaminant origin (lithogenic versus anthropogenic) using the index of geo-accumulation and contamination factors.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b39],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b41]

Methods
=======

Study Area
----------

Lagos and Ibadan are located in southwestern Nigeria. Alaba international market, Ojo (LLS~1~) and Chinatown, Ojota (LLS~2~) are the locations of the two e-waste dumpsites selected for the present study in Lagos. The Alaba market sampling site is a large expanse of land adjacent to the market shopping complex. The major wastes observed on this site were e-waste, followed by polythene bags, cartons, cardboards and cans. The Chinatown dumpsite is located on a small plot of land adjacent to the Chinese building at Ojota, a suburb in Lagos. Wastes observed there included broken monitor glass, plastics, cans, polythene bags and paper. The three Ibadan dumpsites include along Iwo road/Ile-pupa, located behind an electronics shopping complex (ISS~1~), the Ogunpa dumpsite, adjacent to the Ogunpa River channel (ISS~2~), and the Dugbe dumpsite, adjacent to residential buildings (ISS~3~). At every site except for Dugbe (ISS~3~), open burning to recover copper and other valuable materials is commonly practiced. At Dugbe, no traces of burning were apparent among the e-waste piles. Control samples were also collected at the Botanical Garden, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.

Soil Sample Collection
----------------------

Samples for PAH determination were collected with a stainless steel hand trowel, while plastic was used for collection of samples for heavy metal determination. The stainless hand trowel and plastic were cleaned thoroughly to prevent cross contamination. Samples were collected randomly at almost 5 m distance from five different points and combined to form a composite sample, with this process repeated at three different depths (0--15 cm, 15--30 cm and 30--45 cm) for heavy metal determination and two depths (0--15 cm and 15--30 cm) for PAH determination. Samples for PAHs were packed in pre-cleaned aluminum foil, which was previously solvent rinsed and dried at 80°C. Polyethylene bags were used for packing soils for heavy metal determination. Samples for metals and soil characteristics determination were air-dried in the laboratory after manual removal of stones, twigs and other large materials then ground in a porcelain mortar and passed through a 2-mm sieve. PAH samples were preserved on ice and kept in the refrigerator prior to extraction and analyses.

*^C^~f~^i^*

:   Contamination factor

*Eir*

:   Ecological risk factors

*HMW*

:   High molecular weight

*I~geo~*

:   Geo-accumulation index

*LMW*

:   Low molecular weight

*PAH*

:   Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon

*PLI*

:   Pollution load index

*RI*

:   Ecological risk index

*VROM*

:   Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment

Analytical Procedures
---------------------

Samples were analyzed for PAHs, heavy metals and soil characteristics. For the metals analysis, approximately 1 g each of the sieved samples were weighed into digestion tubes and 10 ml aqua regia (concentrated hydrogen chloride and nitric acid, ratio 3:1 vol/vol) added (United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) method 3050b).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b42] The tubes were covered, heated in a water bath to 100°C for 2 hours with intermittent shaking, cooled to room temperature, and then filtered using filter papers (pore size 110 mm). The filtrate was diluted with distilled water to 25 mL and analyzed for total Pb, chromium (Cr), Cd, nickel (Ni), zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) using atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Buck Scientific Model 205A). Metal recovery was carried out by spiking 1 g of the soil sample with known concentrations of each metal. The concentrations of the metals were determined after taking the spiked sample through the entire procedure. The concentrations of each metal in the unspiked sample was deducted from that of the spiked sample and divided by the concentrations of the metals used for spiking, then multiplied by 100. The recovery was between 93.2 -100.4% for all the metals.

Sixteen target PAHs were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GS/MS) following modified USEPA methods (method 827°C).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b43] Approximately 5 g of each sample and 5 g of anhydrous sodium sulphate were weighed and homogenized to a complete mixture. The mixtures were transferred to pre-cleaned extraction tubes, and 25 mL dichloromethane added. The tubes were tightly capped, allowed to stand for 30 minutes, and then shaken vigorously for 30 minutes. The solids were allowed to settle and solvent layers were filtered using filter papers. The procedure was repeated with 25 mL dichloromethane. The two extracts were combined, concentrated on a rotary evaporator (Büchi Rotavapor R-114), exchanged with 5 mL of n-hexane and re-concentrated to 1 mL for clean-up. The extracts were then eluted with 25 mL dichloromethane/hexane (20:80 v/v) on a silica gel column. The extracts were evaporated and re-dissolved in 1 mL n-hexane. The cleaned extracts were analyzed for the 16 representative PAHs using a Shimadzu GS/MS QP 2010 model. Helium gas was used as the carrier gas with a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min, HP-1 ms column (30 m × 0.25 μm 0.25 mm ID), injection mode was pulsed splitless, volume of extract injected was 1 μL, injection port temperature was 290°C, pulse pressure and flow were 35 psi (0.5 min) and 20 mL/min (2 min), respectively; solvent delay was 5 min, initial oven temperature and hold time was 50°C (1 min), ramped at 30°C/min to 280°C and 15°C/min to 310°C with final hold time of 4 min. External calibration using PAHs standard was used for analytes quantification, while identification was based on retention time. The quantification limit of the PAHs in the standard and the samples was 0.001 ppm. The average response factor for the weight ranges were calculated and used for sample quantification. The concentration of each analyte was determined by calculating the amount of analyte injected from the peak response in area ratio as shown below: Calibration factor for each priority PAH =A~C~/M~c~Average calibration factor for each priority PAH, CFav =(ΣCF)/NThe amount of analyte injected, Xs =A~S~/CF~av~Actual concentration of the analyte in the sample extracted (µg/kg) =Xs x Vt x Df/Ws Where; A~c~ =peak area of the compound in the standardM~c~ =mass of the compound injected in nanogramsN =number of calibration points in the external calibration curveA~S~ =peak area of the analyte in the sampleCF~av~ =average calibration factor (for each analyte, the average of the different calibration points)X~s~ =calculated mass of the analyte in the sample aliquot introduced into the instrument (in nanograms)V~t~ =total volume of the concentrated extract (μL)W~s~ =weight of soil sample extracted (g)

Soil pH and total organic carbon (TOC) were determined by standard methods using a Jenway 3310 pH meter in ratio 1:2 (wt/vol) and the Walkey-Black method, respectively.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b44] Approximately 0.5 g of each of the sieved samples were weighed, 10 mL of standard potassium dichromate solution added, and swirled to mix, 15 mL of concentrated sulphuric acid was added gently and mixed. The flasks were allowed to stand for 30 minutes. Five drops of ferroin indicator was added and the resulting mixtures were titrated against ferrous ammonium sulphate until color change from blue green to violet red was observed. Total organic carbon was determined using an appropriate mathematical expression and multiplied by a factor to obtain the total organic matter (TOM).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b22],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b24]

Soil Contamination
------------------

The degree of contamination of the dumpsite and the control site soils was evaluated using four indices.

### Geo-accumulation Index

Geo-accumulation Index (I~geo~) shows the degree of anthropogenic pollution in soil samples by comparing soil metals concentrations to average shale values.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b41],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b45] It is expressed using [Equation 1](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-e01){ref-type="disp-formula"} where,

Cn is the measured concentration of a particular metal in a particular soil sample; Bn is the geochemical background value in average shale of element n and 1.5 is a background matrix correction factor, accounting for lithogenic effects.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b46] We then classified each I~geo~ using Forstner et al. descriptive categories: \<0, unpolluted; 0--1, unpolluted to moderately polluted; 1--2, moderately polluted; 2--3, moderately to highly polluted; 3--4, highly polluted; 4--5, highly to very highly polluted, and \>5, very highly polluted.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b47]

### Contamination Factor

The contamination factor (C~f~^i^) was used by Hakanson to assess soil contamination by comparing the contaminant concentration in the surface layer to a background value.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b41],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b41] We used a modified C~f~^i^ formula, using metals concentrations in the control samples instead of background values, which are currently lacking for Nigeria.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b41] It is expressed using [Equation 2](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-e02){ref-type="disp-formula"}. where,

C~f~^i^ = contamination factor; C^i^~0--1~ = mean concentration of each metal in the soil; Cn^i^ = baseline or background value (concentration of each metal in the control sample was used); n = number of analyzed elements; i = ith element (or pollutants). We then classified the C~f~^i^ using descriptive categories: C~f~^i^ \< 1, low contamination; 1 ≤ C~f~^i^ \< 3, moderate contamination; 3 ≤ C~f~^i^ \< 6, considerable contamination; and 6 ≤ C~f~^i^, very high contamination.

### Pollution Load Index

Pollution load index (PLI) was also used to assess the metal accumulation and multi-element contamination resulting in increased overall metal toxicity.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b50] Heavy metal contamination is associated with a mixture of contaminants rather than one metal contaminant.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b51] The higher the pollution load index, the more serious the heavy metal accumulation in the soil.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b50] We used the PLI to characterize the aggregate contamination of the six target metals using [Equation 3](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-e03){ref-type="disp-formula"}. Where; C~f~^i^ is the contamination factor of each metal.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b40]

### Potential Ecological Risk Index

In this study, a simplified approach to risk assessment based on comparison of the measured level of contamination in the soil of the studied sites with the background value from the control sample was adopted.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b49] Although the ecological risk index (RI) is primarily intended by Hakanson to express the ecotoxic potential of increased concentrations of toxic metals such as arsenic, Cu, Ni, cobalt, Pb, Cd, and mercury in consumable fish, it can also be applied for the assessment of the potential risk from toxic substances to biota and non-human biota in other similar media such as contaminated soils.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b39],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b52] We used the RI introduced by Hakanson to characterize the metal contamination of each sample in terms of their potential ecotoxicity using the [Equations 4 to 6](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-e04){ref-type="disp-formula"}. where;

Fi is the single metal pollution index; Cs is the concentration of metal in the samples; Cr is the reference value for the metal; Eir is the monomial potential ecological risk factor; Tir is the metal toxic response factor according to Hakanson, and Zn = 1\< Cr = 2 \< Cu = Ni = Pb = 5 \< As = 10 \< Cd 30.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b39],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b53] The ecological risk index is the potential ecological risk caused by the overall contamination categorized in the four classes as shown in [Table 1](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t01){ref-type="table"}. The potential ecological risk caused by Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Ni and Cr on the e-waste dumpsite soils in Lagos and Ibadan were calculated based on the potential ecological risk factor (Eir). The ecological RI value characterizes the sensitivity of the local ecosystem to the pollutants i.e., metals, and represents the ecological risks resulting from the overall contamination. The overall RI was calculated as the sum of all the four risk factors.

###### 

Ecological Risk Category of Metals

  Eir value          Level of Ecological Risk of Metal   RI Value          Ecological Risk Category
  ------------------ ----------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------
  Eir \< 40          Low risk                            RI \< 110         Low risk
  40 ≤ Eir \< 80     Moderate risk                       110 ≤ RI \< 200   Moderate risk
  80 ≤ Eir \< 160    Considerable risk                   200 ≤RI \<400     Considerable risk
  160 ≤ Eir \< 320   High risk                           400 ≤ RI          Very high risk
  320 ≤ Eir          Very high risk                                        

Abbreviations: RI, ecological risk index; Eir, ecological risk factor

Statistical Analysis
--------------------

Obtained data (i.e., soil properties, metals concentrations and total concentrations of PAHs) were subjected to descriptive statistics and Pearson\'s correlation coefficient to determine whether there were significant relationships between total PAHs, metals concentrations and soil properties. The statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0.

Results
=======

Soil Characteristics and Total Metals Concentrations
----------------------------------------------------

The pH of topsoil (0--15 cm) ranged from 5.77--5.80 and 5.84 - 6.30, respectively, in samples collected in Lagos (LSS) and Ibadan (ISS), while total organic matter ranged from 8.32--8.85% and 3.27--8.65%, respectively (*[Table 2](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t02){ref-type="table"}*). In general, e-waste dumpsite soils were more acidic than the control soil. This might be attributed to the parent material and burning of wastes on the dumpsites. Among dumpsite soils, the Lagos samples were more acidic, with high TOM compared to Ibadan samples. Metals concentrations across dumpsites varied widely. Topsoil Pb ranged from 193--2,240 mg/kg in Lagos and 246--2,090 mg/kg in Ibadan, while Cu ranged from 50.5--5,390 mg/kg and 79.3--1,150 mg/kg, Zn ranged from 220--1930 mg/kg and 27.5--3420 mg/kg, Cd ranged from 0.43--5.85 mg/kg and not detectable-6.50 mg/kg, Ni ranged from 11.0--51.5 mg/kg and 27.7--128 mg/kg, and Cr ranged from 108--118 mg/kg and 94.0--325 mg/kg, in Lagos and Ibadan, respectively (*[Table 2](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t02){ref-type="table"}*). Metals concentrations in the control sample were generally lower than what was detected in e-waste dumpsite soils by over one hundred orders of magnitude in some metals, which may be at least partly explained by e-waste burning activity at the dumpsites. Most heavy metals determined in soils collected from Wenling, an emerging e-waste recycling city in Taizhou, China exceeded the respective Grade II value of soil quality standards from the State Environmental Protection Administration of China and also exceeded the Dutch optimum values.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b19] High levels of Cu (712 and 496 mg/kg) exceeding the new Dutch list action value (of 190 mg/kg) were reported in soil near a printer roller dumping area and a plastic burning site at an electronic waste recycling site at Guiyu, southeast China (*[Table 3](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t03){ref-type="table"}*).

###### 

Concentrations of Heavy Metals and Soil Characteristics of E-waste Dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan

  **Sampling Location**   **Depth (cm)**   **Cu**   **Zn**   **Cd**   **Pb**   **Ni**   **Cr**   **pH**   **TOM (%)**
  ----------------------- ---------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------------
  **Lagos**                                                                                               
   LLS~1~                 15               5,390    1,820    5.63     2,840    51.5     113      5.77     8.85
  30                      3,830            1,550    5.85     1,630    36.1     110      5.77     8.63     
  45                      2,780            1,480    2.63     260      25.1     108      5.76     6.73     
   LLS~2~                 15               50.5     220      0.45     193      17.5     114      5.80     8.32
  30                      57.5             1,930    0.58     114      12.0     118      5.77     6.88     
  45                      50.0             1,750    0.43     142      11.0     111      5.77     3.48     
  **Ibadan**                                                                                              
   ISS~1~                 15               1,150    3,420    4.53     2,090    48.7     114      5.93     8.65
  30                      440              161      2.28     768      27.7     107      5.88     6.79     
  45                      310              1,430    1.98     302      40.5     104      5.89     3.09     
   ISS~2~                 15               101      1,840    6.30     1,030    46.4     103      5.84     7.95
  30                      356              571      2.88     365      27.7     111      5.88     6.54     
  45                      1,210            815      6.50     840      41.1     105      5.89     3.06     
   ISS~3~                 15               79.3     105      0.03     246      128      325      6.30     3.27
  30                      51.8             77.8     0.03     253      104      117      6.17     0.88     
  45                      42.8             27.5     ND       178      47.5     94.0     6.10     0.36     
   CSS                    15               3.98     47.4     0.35     6.25     0.33     3.95     6.89     1.56
  30                      7.55             26.2     0.45     6.75     2.35     3.58     7.21     0.29     
  45                      4.75             19.8     0.50     13.8     2.23     5.08     7.07     0.24     

Values presented as mg/kg

Abbreviations: ND, not detected

###### 

Comparison of Heavy Metal Concentrations in Soil of E-waste Dumpsites Across Studies

  Location                                                   Type of Soil or Sediment                                                       Cr           Ni             Cu            Zn             Cd            Hg             Pb            Reference
  ---------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- ------------ -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- ------------
  **Lagos, and Ibadan**, **Nigeria**                         E-waste dumpsite soils                                                                                                                                                             This study
  Surface soil (0--15 cm)                                    Range                                                          103--325        17.5--128    50.0--5,390    105--3,420    0.03--6.30     \-            246--2,840                   
  Subsoil (15--30 cm)                                        Range                                                          107--118        12.0--104    51.8--3,830    77.8--1,930   0.03--5.85     \-            114--1,630                   
  Subsoil (30--45 cm)                                        Range                                                          47.5--111       11.0--47.5   42.8--2,780    27.5--1,750   ND-6.50        \-            142--840                     
  Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China                          Paddy soil (0--20 cm) in an e-waste recycling area (*n* = 6)   Range           54.4--74.1   25.8--46.2     56.1--236.9   \-             0.55--7.86    0.24--0.76 5   1.96--64.6    53
  Longtang Town, Northern Guangdong Province, China          Surface soil (0--15 cm) of a vegetable garden (n = 16)         Range           12.3±5.1     8.83±2.9       324±172       122±55.7       0.9±0.8       \-             95.6±19.5     54
  9.66--19                                                   7.04--10.3                                                     210--450        92.4--142    0.26--1.17     \-            73.3--134                                                 
  Surface soil (0--15 cm) of a paddy field (n = 11)          Range                                                          17.3±8.1        34.5±26.6    155±94         166±76.7      1.0±0.4        \-            61.8±24                      
  10.5--24.1                                                 10.8--66                                                       40.1--260       62.1--252    0.04--1.43     \-            48.1--97                                                  
  Surface soil (0--15 cm) of an incineration site (n = 11)   Range                                                          68.9±53         60.1±59      11,140±9,000   3,690±2,680   17.1±12.5      \-            4,500±3 370                  
  23.6--122                                                  12.2--132                                                      1,500--21,400   682--8,970   3.05--46.8     \-            629--7,720                                                
  Bangalore City, India                                      Soil of an e-waste recycling site in a slum area (n = 7)       Range           46--160      \-             61.7--4,790   126--2,530     0.385--38.9   0.09--59       90.4--2,850   55
  Soil of an e-waste recycling area (n = 3)                  Range                                                          50--62          \-           154--2,190     119--499      0.301--0.906   \-            79.1--262                    

Metals Contamination Indices
----------------------------

The I~geo~ analysis showed that the soil of LLS~1~ was very highly polluted with Pb and Cu, moderately to highly polluted with Zn and Cd, and unpolluted with Cr and Ni (*[Table 4](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t04){ref-type="table"}*). The second dumpsite in Lagos, LLS~2~, was highly polluted with Zn and Pb, unpolluted with Cu, Ni, and Cr, and unpolluted to moderately polluted with Cd. The same trend was observed in Ibadan dumpsites samples, while the control sample was not found to be polluted with any of the target metals. The Dugbe dumpsite (ISS~3~) in Ibadan, where e-waste burning was not typically observed, was generally unpolluted with the targeted metals except for Pb (~Igeo~ range 2-3) and Ni (I~geo~ range 0--1), which may be attributed to other possible sources of contamination such as vehicular emissions and atmospheric deposition.

###### 

Geo-accumulation Indices of Metals in Dumpsite and Control Soil Samples

  **Sampling Location**   **Depth (cm)**   **Cu**   **Zn**          **Cd**          **Pb**   **Ni**   **Cr**
  ----------------------- ---------------- -------- --------------- --------------- -------- -------- --------
  **Lagos**                                                                                           
  LLS~1~                  15               6.32     3.67            3.65            6.56     0.99     −0.26
  30                      5.83             3.44     3.70            5.76            −1.50    −0.30    
  45                      5.36             3.38     2.55            3.11            −2.02    −0.32    
  LLS~2~                  15               −0.42    0.63            3.2 × 10^−16^   2.69     −2.54    −0.24
  30                      −0.23            3.76     0.37            1.93            −3.09    −0.19    
  45                      −0.43            3.62     −0.07           2.24            −3.21    −0.28    
  **Ibadan**                                                                                          
  ISS~1~                  15               3.09     4.58            3.33            6.12     −1.07    −1.47
  30                      1.70             0.18     2.34            4.68            −1.88    −2.29    
  45                      1.20             3.33     2.14            3.33            −1.33    −1.74    
  ISS~2~                  15               −0.42    3.69            3.81            5.10     −1.14    −1.54
  30                      1.40             2.00     2.68            3.60            −1.88    −2.29    
  45                      3.16             2.52     3.85            4.81            −1.31    −1.72    
  ISS~3~                  15               −0.77    −0.44           −4.17           3.04     0.38     −0.08
  30                      −1.38            −0.87    −4.17           3.08            0.03     −0.38    
  45                      −1.66            −2.37    0               2.57            −1.10    −1.51    
  CSS                     15               −4.08    −1.59           −0.36           −2.26    −8.27    −5.09
  30                      −3.16            −2.44    3.2 × 10^−16^   −2.15           −5.44    −5.24    
  45                      −3.83            −2.85    0.15            −1.12           −5.52    −4.73    

The C~f~^i^ analyses using Hakanson\'s classification showed that the dumpsites soils were highly contaminated with all of the metals except for Cd, which showed moderate contamination at the sites LLS~2~ and ISS~3~ (*[Table 5](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t05){ref-type="table"}*).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b39] Contamination of site LLS~1~ was the highest, possibly attributable to the large volume of e-waste handled at Alaba, an international electronics market for both Nigeria and West Africa. The PLI calculations showed serious metals accumulation at all the e-waste dumpsites with the Alaba market (LLS~1~) having the highest pollution load index of 109 (*[Table 5](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t05){ref-type="table"}*). In the Eir analyses, Zn showed low levels of ecological risk at all the dumpsites except for ISS~1~ in Ibadan, which had moderate risk (*[Table 6](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t06){ref-type="table"}*). In most cases, Cu, Cd, Pb, and Ni showed moderate to very high ecological risk, while Cr showed moderate to high ecological risk. The RI values were between 584 and 10,402 at all of the dumpsites, signifying very high ecological risk.

###### 

Metal Contamination Factors and Pollution Load Indices in Dumpsites

  **Sites**    Cu     Zn     Cd     Pb     Ni     Cr     Total C^f^~i~   PLI
  ------------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ --------------- ------
  **Lagos**                                                              
  LLS~1~       1354   38.4   16.1   454    156    28.6   2,047           109
  LLS~2~       12.7   4.64   1.29   30.9   53.0   28.9   131             12.4
  **Ibadan**                                                             
  ISS~1~       289    72.2   12.9   334    148    28.9   885             85.1
  ISS~2~       25.4   38.8   18.0   165    141    26.1   414             46.9
  ISS~3~       19.9   2.22   0.07   39.4   388    82.3   532             12.6

Abbreviations: Cf

i, contamination factor; PLI, pollution load index

###### 

Metals Ecological Risk Factors and Risk Indices in Dumpsites

  **E-waste Dumpsites**   **Eir**   **RI**                                 
  ----------------------- --------- -------- ------ ------- ------- ------ --------
  **LLS1**                6,771     38.4     483    2,270   780     57.2   10,402
  **LLS2**                63.4      4.64     38.6   154     265     57.7   584
  **ISS1**                1,445     72.2     388    1,672   738     57.7   4,373
  **ISS2**                127       38.8     540    824     703     52.2   2,285
  **ISS3**                99.6      2.22     2.14   197     1,939   165    2,405

Abbreviations: Eir, ecological risk factor; RI, risk index

PAH Concentrations
------------------

The USEPA identified 16 priority PAHs, which can be classified as being of low or high molecular weight. Low molecular weight (LMW) PAHs (i.e., acenaphthylene, naphthalene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene and anthracene), also referred to as petrogenic (formed during the emission of non-combustion-derived matter, including inadvertent oil spills), have molecular weights ranging from 128.2 to 178.2 g/mol. High molecular weight (HMW), pyrolytic PAHs, are fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(a) fluoranthene, benzo(k)pyrene, dibenzo(a, h)anthracene, benzo(g, h, i) perylene and indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene and have molecular weights ranging from 202.3 to 278.4 g/mol.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b56],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b57] Pyrogenic PAHs are formed during the incomplete combustion of coal, oil, gas wood and garbage. The % HMW PAHs was higher than % LMW PAHs at the dumpsites and the control site. The ranges of % LMW and HMW at 0--15 cm were 27.6--34.9 and 48.5--52.9, respectively, and 24.1--32.8 and 47.4--54.8, respectively, at the 15--30 cm depth. The percentage at both depths in the control soil was 18% and 65.5%, respectively (*[Tables 7](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t07){ref-type="table"} and [8](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t08){ref-type="table"}*). This indicates that high molecular weight PAHs were the predominant PAHs throughout the dumpsites. The total concentrations of the 16 target PAHs, including 5 carcinogenic PAHs, in the dumpsites and control soils at the 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm depths are presented in [Tables 7](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t07){ref-type="table"} and [8](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t08){ref-type="table"}, respectively. Total PAHs ranged from 1,756--2,224 μg/kg and 1,664--2,152 μg/kg at depths of 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm, respectively. Total PAHs obtained from the control soil was 278 μg/kg at both depths. Total PAHs were generally an order of magnitude greater in the dumpsites soils compared to the control sample, possible evidence of contamination by burning activities at the dumpsites. Anthracene and 2-methyl naphthalene were not detected in any of the samples, while phenanthrene, pyrene and fluoranthene were found in the highest concentrations for the PAHs determined in this study. Five and six-membered ring PAHs were the most prevalent at all of the sites, which may be due to their very high level of resistance to environmental degradation.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b54] Among the 7 carcinogenic PAHs (i.e., banz(a) anthracene, chrysene, benzo(a) fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene), benzo(g,h,i)perylene was not detected in any of the soil samples except for soil collected at the ISS~2~ dumpsite at a 15--30 cm depth. Benzo(a) fluoranthene and benzo(a)pyrene were not determined in any of the samples. The % carcinogenic PAHs in the soils of e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan ranged from 29.5--39.6 and 31.2--47.5 at the 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm level, respectively.

###### 

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations in Dumpsite and Control Soil Samples, 0--15 cm Depth

  Target Analytes                 LLS~1~   LLS~2~   ISS~1~   ISS~2~   CSS
  ------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------
  Naphthalene (Nap)               10.0     ND       ND       ND       ND
  2-methyl Naphthalene (mNap)     ND       ND       ND       ND       ND
  Acenaphthylene (Acy)            37.0     38.0     38.0     38.0     ND
  Acenaphthene (Ace)              9.00     9.00     9.00     9.00     ND
  Fluorene (Flu)                  140      137      141      143      ND
  Phenanthrene (Phe)              323      593      345      392      50.0
  Anthracene (Ant)                ND       ND       ND       ND       ND
  Fluoranthene (Fla)              251      293      240      260      41.0
  Pyrene (Pyr)                    255      384      245      271      37.0
  Benz(a)anthracene (BaA)         227      247      235      227      45.0
  Chrysene (Chr)                  213      199      190      267      33.0
  Benzo(k)fluoranthene (BkF)      215      211      204      224      40.0
  Benzo(b)fluoranthene (BbF)      109      113      109      111      ND
  Perylene (Per)                  ND       ND       ND       51.0     6.00
  Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (BghiP)    ND       ND       ND       ND       ND
  Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (DahA)    ND       ND       ND       ND       26.0
  Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (IcdP)   ND       ND       ND       119      ND
                                                                      
  Total PAH                       1,789    2,224    1,756    2,112    278
  %LMW PAH                        29.0     34.9     30.4     27.6     18.0
  %HMW PAH                        52.9     50.5     51.8     48.5     65.5
  \% C PAH                        36.6     29.5     35.8     39.6     51.8

Values presented as μg/kg.

Abbreviations: LMW, low molecular weight; HMW, high molecular weight; C, carcinogenic PAH; ND, not detected

###### 

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations in Dumpsite and Control Soil Samples, 15--30 cm Depth

  Target Analytes                 LLS~1~   LLS~2~   ISS~1~   ISS~2~   CSS
  ------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------
  Naphthalene (Nap)               ND       ND       ND       ND       ND
  2-methylNaphthalene (mNap)      ND       ND       ND       ND       ND
  Acenaphthylene (Acy)            37.0     38.0     38.0     37.0     ND
  Acenaphthene (Ace)              9.00     9.00     9.00     8.00     ND
  Fluorene (Flu)                  141      136      ND       140      ND
  Phenanthrene (Phe)              294      523      392      324      50.0
  Anthracene (Ant)                ND       ND       ND       ND       ND
  Fluoranthene (Fla)              229      277      241      259      41.0
  Pyrene (Pyr)                    226      349      244      274      37.0
  Benz(a)anthracene (BaA)         229      245      227      242      45.0
  Chrysene (Chr)                  188      214      204      227      33.0
  Benzo(k)fluoranthene (BkF)      202      213      206      225      40.0
  Benzo(b)fluoranthene (BbF)      109      113      110      110      ND
  Perylene (Per)                  ND       35.0     ND       59.0     6.00
  Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (BghiP)    ND       ND       ND       195      ND
  Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (DahA)    ND       ND       ND       ND       26.0
  Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (IcdP)   ND       ND       ND       116      ND
                                                                      
  Total PAH                       1,664    2,152    1,671    2,116    278
  \% LMW PAH                      28.9     32.8     26.3     24.1     18.0
  \% HMW PAH                      52.4     50.4     54.8     47.4     65.5
  \% C PAH                        37.2     31.2     38.1     47.5     51.8

Values presented as μg/kg

Abbreviations: LMW, low molecular weight; HMW, high molecular weight; C, carcinogenic PAH

According to the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM), the total concentrations of ten VROM PAHs (napthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, benzo(a) anthracene, chrysene, benzo(a) pyrene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene, benzo(k) fluoranthene and indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene) in soil should not exceed the maximum value of 1000 μg/kg.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b58] The concentrations of nine VROM PAHs determined in the soil samples at depths of 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm exceeded this value. The concentrations of nine VROM PAHs (benzo(a)pyrene was not determined) ranged from 1,231- 1,543 μg/kg and 1,142--1,588 μg/kg at the depths of 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm, respectively. The Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation (Pulawy, Poland) classification showed that soils with total PAH \< 1,000 μg/kg dry weight (dw) can be considered to be unpolluted.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b59] The total PAHs concentrations of all of the samples in the dumpsite soils and the control exceeded the typical concentration of arable topsoil (around 200 μg/kg) in Sweden.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b60] The target established by the Dutch government for PAHs in uncontaminated soil is 20--50 μg/kg (dw).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b61] The total PAHs concentrations at depths of 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm in all the e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan exceeded the 50 μg/kg limit. Thus, all of the study sites were considered to be highly polluted by PAHs.

The ratio of PAH profiles maybe used to track their origin as petrogenic, biogenic and pyrogenic sources.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b20],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b62],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b63] Petrogenic sources are characterized with the predominance of LMW PAHs (naphthalene, 2-methyl naphthalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene and anthracene) over the HMW PAHs (fluoranthene, pyrene, benz(a) anthracene, chrysene, benzo(a) pyrene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene). A ratio of LMW to HMW greater than 1 indicates a petrogenic source.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b64] In the soils of e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan, we obtained a LMW/HMW range of 0.55--0.69 and 0.48--0.65 at the 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm level, respectively, which indicated pollution of pyrolytic origin (*[Table 9](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t09){ref-type="table"}*). The ratios of fluoranthene to fluoranthene plus pyrene, benzo(a) anthracene to benzo(a)anthracene plus chrysene and indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene to indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene plus benzo(g,h,i)perylene were also used for source identification.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b19],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b30],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b65],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b66] The ranges obtained were 0.43--0.50, 0.44--0.50; 0.46--0.55, 0.52--0.55; 0--1.0, 0--0.37, respectively, at the 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm levels, respectively, for these PAHs. These values indicated that PAHs had both pyrolytic and petrolytic origins. The results obtained in this study were compared with those in the literature and are presented in [Table 10](#i2156-9614-7-15-71-t10){ref-type="table"}. It was reported that total PAHs in soil collected from Wenling, an emerging e-waste recycling area in Taizhou, China ranged from 371.8 to 1231.2 μg/kg, and relatively higher PAHs concentrations were found in soils taken from simple household workshops.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b19]

###### 

Diagnostic Ratio of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

  **Soil depth**   **LMW/HMW**   **Fla/(Fla + Pyr)**   **BaA/(BaA + Chr)**   **IcdP/(IcdP + BghiP)**
  ---------------- ------------- --------------------- --------------------- -------------------------
  **0--15 cm**                                                               
  LLS~1~           0.55          0.50                  0.52                  0
  LLS~2~           0.69          0.43                  0.55                  0
  ISS~1~           0.59          0.49                  0.55                  0
  ISS~2~           0.57          0.49                  0.46                  1.0
  **15--30 cm**                                                              
  LLS~1~           0.55          0.50                  0.55                  0
  LLS~2~           0.65          0.44                  0.53                  0
  ISS~1~           0.48          0.50                  0.53                  0
  ISS~2~           0.51          0.49                  0.52                  0.37
  **Control**      0.27          0.53                  0.58                  0

Abbreviations: Fla, fluoranthene; Pyr, pyrene; BaA, benz(a)anthracene; Chr, chrysene; IcdP, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene; BghiP, benzo(g,h,i)perylen

###### 

Concentrations of the 16 USEPA Identified Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil and Sediment Samples from E-waste Processing Areas in China Compared with this Study

  Location                                                                                   Type of Soil or Sediment                                                     Range              Mean      Reference
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------- ------------
                                                                                                                                                                          μg/kg dry weight             
                                                                                                                                                                                                       
  **Lagos and Ibadan, Nigeria**                                                              Topsoil (0--15cm) of e-waste dumpsite (*n = 20*)                             1,756--2,224                 This study
  Subsoil (15--30 cm) of e-waste dumpsite (*n = 20*)                                         1,664--2,152                                                                                              
  Control (0--15 cm; 15--30 cm) (n = 5)                                                      278                                                                                                       
  Guiyu, Guangdong Province,                                                                 Surface soil (0--10 cm) of a burnt plastic dump site (*n* = 3)                                  428       34
  Surface soil (0--10 cm) near an open burning site (*n* = 8)                                                                                                             851                30        
  Surface soil (0--10 cm) of an open burning site (*n* = 5)                                                                                                               2,065                        
  Surface soil (0--10 cm) of an open burning site (*n* = 5)                                                                                                               1,066              67        
  Surface soil (0--10 cm) of an open burning site (*n* = 5)                                                                                                               899.9                        
  Surface soil (0--10 cm) of an open burning site (*n* = 5)                                                                                                               2,777                        
  Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China                                                          Surface soil (0--20 cm) of large recycling plants (*n* = 5)                  128.8--6,687.2               68
  Surface soils (0--20 cm) of small recycling workshops (*n* = 3)                            135.3--228.8                                                                                              
  Surface soils (0--20 cm) of control sites (*n* = 3)                                        5.2--29.4                                                                                                 
  Local agricultural surface soil (0--20 cm) from an e-waste recycling facility (*n* = 10)   330--20,000                                                                                     69        
  Topsoil (0--30 cm) of large-scale e-waste recycling plants in Wenling (*n* = 14)           488.0--764.0                                                                                    19        
  Topsoil (0--30 cm) of large-scale gold recycling plants in Wenling (*n* = 5)               371.8--850.7                                                                                              
  Topsoil (0--30 cm) of household e-waste recycling workshops in Wenling (*n* = 18)          730.5--1,231.2                                                                                            
  Reference site (*n* = 1)                                                                                                                                                0.4                          
  Near household e-waste recycling workshops                                                 809--7,880                                                                                      70        
  Near industrial parks                                                                      2,820--3,020                                                                                              
  Qingyuan, Guangdong Province, China                                                        Road soils mixed with deposited dust near dismantling workshops (*n* = 29)   190.8--9,156.0     2,689.1   71

Statistical Analysis
--------------------

Statistical analyses of the results obtained in the e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan using Pearson\'s correlation coefficient (*Tables 11 and 12*) showed very strong and negatively significant correlations between total PAHs versus Cd (r = −0.955, p\< 0.05), Ni (r = −0.973, p\< 0.05) and TOC (r = −0.899, p\< 0.05) in Ibadan, suggesting that these contaminants might have originated from similar sources, such as burning of e-waste at dumpsites. There was no significant correlation between total PAHs and TOC (r = −0.395, p\< 0.05), and no significant correlation with most of the metals except for Zn (r = 0.648, p\< 0.05) in soils of e-waste dumpsites in Lagos, suggesting different emission sources.

Discussion
==========

Migration of Cd from topsoil to the subsurface soil was observed in both the Lagos and Ibadan dumpsites. In most cases, Cu, Zn and Pb concentrations were highest in topsoil, which was evidence of recent/anthropogenic contamination, but with limited evidence of migration to the subsoil.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b72] This indicates that there is little risk of groundwater contamination at these sites. All of the e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan exhibited multi-element contamination from anthropogenic inputs, most likely from e-waste burning activity. The indices of potential ecological risk were found in the following order at the different sites: LLS~1~: Cu \> Pb \> Ni \> Cd \> Cr \> Zn;LLS~2~: Ni \> Pb \> Cu \> Cr \> Cd \> Zn;ISS~1~: Pb \> Cu \> Ni \> Cd \> Zn \> Cr;ISS~2~: Pb \> Ni \> Cd \> Cu \> Cr \> Zn;ISS~3~: Ni \> Pb \> Cr \> Cu \> Zn \> Cd.

The total PAH concentrations of all of the samples in the dumpsite soils and the control exceeded the typical concentration of arable topsoil (around 200 μg/kg) in Sweden and the target established by the Dutch government for PAHs in uncontaminated soil of 20--50 μg/kg (dw).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b60],[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b61] This is a public health concern, since several of the measured PAHs are considered probable human carcinogens (benz(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene and indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene) or possibly (benzo(a)fluoranthene, benzo(k) fluoranthene and indeno(1,2,3-c,d) pyrene).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b73] Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene and dibenz(a,h)anthracene were not detected in any of the samples except at a site in Ibadan, ISS~2~, and the control soil, respectively, at depths of 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm. Phenantherene (LMW) PAH is a thermodynamically stable compound mainly derived from petrogenic sources (from the release of uncombusted petroleum products such as gasoline, diesel fuel and fuel oil from vehicle traffic).[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b30] Its predominance in the soil of e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan and the control indicates a petrogenic source. Comparison of pollution in the four dumpsites considered in Lagos and Ibadan showed the following trend: 0--15 cm: LLS~2~ \> ISS~2~ \> LLS~1~ \> ISS~1~15--30 cm: LLS~2~ \> ISS~2~ \> ISS~1~ \> LLS~1~

The PAHs profile pattern in soils of four e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan were similar. In most cases, the concentrations of individual PAHs were higher in soil at the 0--15 cm level compared to soil at the 15--30 cm level. Phenanthrene and pyrene were the most abundant pollutants at all of the sites at the 0--15 cm and 15--30 cm levels, except at LLS~1~, where phenanthrene and fluoranthene were the most abundant, while 2-methylnaphthalene and anthracene were not detected in any of the e-waste dumpsites or the control site. However, pyrene, fluoranthene, benz(a)anthracene, and chrysene (HMW) typically have a pyrogenic source (from combustion of fossil fuels). Hence, the PAH profile in the soil of e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan suggests both petrogenic and pyrogenic sources.

Conclusions
===========

The degree of contamination and ecological risk posed by metals in e-waste dumpsite soils in Lagos and Ibadan, Nigeria were evaluated in the present study. The results provide evidence that open burning, stockpiling, and other improper e-waste management practices may have resulted in toxic metal accumulation in soils of e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan, corroborating previous results at e-waste dumpsites in other countries. Various metals contamination indices showed moderate to very high levels of contamination in the dumpsite soils, indicating potential threats to human and ecological health. We found PAHs at levels exceeding 1,000 μg/kg in dumpsite soils, suggesting anthropogenic contamination from both petrogenic and pyrogenic sources. It was previously shown that leachates from municipal solid waste dumpsites in Nigeria contain high concentrations of metals, PAHs and PCBs.[@i2156-9614-7-15-71-b56]

Our work shows that improper e-waste handling at these sites may contribute additional metals and PAH contamination and highlights the need for regular soil monitoring at major dumpsites in Nigeria.

[^1]: ***Competing Interests.*** The authors declare no competing financial interests
