\section{Introduction}\label{sec1}\setcounter{equation}{0}
	Let $\mathcal{O}\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ ($n=2,3$) be a bounded domain with a smooth boundary $\partial\mathcal{O}$. The	convective Brinkman-Forchheimer (CBF)  equations or the tamed Navier-Stokes equations are given by (see \cite{KT2} for Brinkman-Forchheimer equations with fast growing nonlinearities)
\begin{equation}\label{1}
\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\frac{\partial \mathbf{u}}{\partial t}-\mu \Delta\mathbf{u}+(\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u}+\alpha\mathbf{u}+\beta|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}+\nabla p&=\mathbf{f}, \ \text{ in } \ \mathcal{O}\times(0,T), \\ \nabla\cdot\mathbf{u}&=0, \ \text{ in } \ \mathcal{O}\times(0,T), \\
	\mathbf{u}&=\mathbf{0}\ \text{ on } \ \partial\mathcal{O}\times(0,T), \\
	\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0 \ \text{ in } \ \mathcal{O},\\
	\int_{\mathcal{O}}p(x,t)\d x&=0, \ \text{ in } \ (0,T).
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
The convective Brinkman-Forchheimer equations \eqref{1} describe the motion of incompressible fluid flows in a saturated porous medium.  Here $\mathbf{u}(t , x) \in \mathbb{R}^n$ represents the velocity field at time $t$ and position $x$, $p(t,x)\in\mathbb{R}$ denotes the pressure field, $\mathbf{f}(t,x)\in\mathbb{R}^n$ is an external forcing. The final condition in \eqref{1} is imposed for the uniqueness of the pressure $p$. The constant $\mu$ represents the positive Brinkman coefficient (effective viscosity), the positive constants $\alpha$ and $\beta$ represent the Darcy (permeability of porous medium) and Forchheimer (proportional to the porosity of the material) coefficients, respectively. The absorption exponent $r\in[1,\infty)$ and  $r=3$ is known as the critical exponent.  For $\alpha=\beta=0$, we obtain the classical 3D Navier-Stokes equations (see \cite{OAL,Te,Te1,PCCF,FMRT,GGP,JCR3}, etc). The nonlineartiy of the form $|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}$ can be found in tidal dynamics as well as non-Newtonian fluid flows (see \cite{CTA,MTM3,MTM5}, etc and references therein). 

Let us now discuss some of the solvability results available in the literature for the 3D CBF and related equations in the whole space as well as periodic domains. The authors in \cite{ZCQJ}, showed that the Cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations with damping $r|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}$ in the whole space has global weak solutions, for any $r\geq 1$, global strong solutions, for any $r\geq 7/2$ and that the strong solution is unique, for any $7/2\leq r\leq 5$. An improvement to this result was made in \cite{ZZXW} and the authors showed that the above mentioned problem has global strong solutions, for any $r>3$ and the strong solution is unique, when $3<r\leq 5$. Later, the authors in \cite{YZ}  proved that the strong solution exists globally for $r\geq 3$, and they established two regularity criteria, for $1\leq r<3$. For any $r\geq 1$, they proved that the strong solution is unique even among weak solutions.  The existence and uniqueness of a smooth solution to a tamed 3D Navier-Stokes equation in the whole space is proved in  \cite{MRXZ}.    A simple proof of the existence of global-in-time smooth solutions for the CBF equations \eqref{1} with $r>3$ on a 3D periodic domain is obtained in \cite{KWH}. The authors also proved that  global, regular solutions exist also for the critical value $r=3$, provided that the coefficients satisfy the relation $4\beta\mu\geq 1$. Furthermore, they showed that in the critical case every weak solution verifies the energy equality and hence is continuous into the phase space $\mathbb{L}^2$. The authors in \cite{KWH1} showed that the strong solutions of three dimensional CBF  equations in periodic domains with  the absorption exponent $r\in[1,3]$ remain strong under small enough changes of initial condition and forcing function. 

The authors in \cite{SNA} considered the Navier-Stokes problem in bounded domains with compact boundary, modified by the absorption term $|\mathbf{u}|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}$, for $r>2$. For this problem, they proved the existence of weak solutions in the Leray-Hopf sense, for any dimension $n\geq 2$ and its uniqueness for $n=2$. But  in three dimensions, they were not able to establish the energy equality satisfied by the weak solutions. The existence of regular dissipative solutions and global attractors for the system \eqref{1} with $r> 3$ is established in \cite{KT2}. As a global smooth solution exists for $r>3$, the energy equality is satisfied in bounded domains. Recently, the authors in \cite{CLF} were able to construct functions that can approximate functions defined on smooth bounded domains by elements of eigenspaces of linear operators (e.g., the Laplacian or the Stokes operator) in such a way that the approximations are bounded and converge in both Sobolev and Lebesgue spaces simultaneously. As a simple application of this result, they proved that all weak solutions of the critical CBF equations ($r=3$) posed on a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$ satisfy the energy equality. 


Let us now discuss some results available in the literature for the stochastic counterpart of the \eqref{1} and related models in the whole space or on a torus. The existence of a unique strong solution 
\begin{align}\label{2}
\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H}^1(\mathcal{O})))\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H}^2(\mathcal{O})),
\end{align} with $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. continuous paths in $\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H}^1(\mathcal{O})),$  for $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{H}^1(\mathcal{O}))$,  to the stochastic tamed 3D Navier-Stokes equation in the whole space as well as in the periodic boundary case is obtained in \cite{MRXZ1}. They also prove the existence of a  unique  invariant measure for the corresponding transition semigroup.  Recently, \cite{ZBGD} improved their results  for a slightly simplified system. The authors in \cite{WLMR} established the local and global existence and uniqueness of solutions for general deterministic and stochastic nonlinear evolution equations with coefficients satisfying some local monotonicity and generalized coercivity conditions. In \cite{WL}, the author showed the existence and uniqueness of strong solutions for a large class of SPDE, where the coefficients satisfy the local monotonicity and Lyapunov condition,  and he provided the stochastic tamed 3D Navier-Stokes equations as an example. A large deviation principle of Freidlin-Wentzell type for the stochastic tamed 3D Navier-Stokes equations driven by multiplicative noise  in the whole space or on a torus  is established in \cite{MRTZ1}. All these works established the existence and uniqueness of strong solutions in the regularity class given in \eqref{2}. The global solvability of 3D Navier-Stokes equations in the whole space with a Brinkman-Forchheimer type term subject to an anisotropic viscosity and a random perturbation of multiplicative type is described in the work \cite{HBAM}. 

Unlike whole space or periodic domains, in bounded domains, there is a technical difficulty in getting the regularity given in \eqref{2} of the velocity field $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ appearing in \eqref{1}.   It is  mentioned in the paper \cite{KT2} that the major difficulty in working with bounded domains is that $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u})$ ($\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}:\mathbb{L}^2(\mathcal{O})\to\mathbb{H}$ is the Helmholtz-Hodge orthogonal projection) need not be zero on the boundary, and $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}$ and $-\Delta$ are not necessarily commuting (see Example 2.19, \cite{JCR4}). Moreover, $\Delta\mathbf{u}\big|_{\partial\mathcal{O}}\neq 0$ in general and the term with pressure will not disappear (see \cite{KT2}), while taking inner product with $\Delta\mathbf{u}$ to the first equation in \eqref{1}. Therefore, the equality 
\begin{align}\label{3}
&\int_{\mathcal{O}}(-\Delta\mathbf{u}(x))\cdot|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}(x)\d x\nonumber\\&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\d x+4\left[\frac{r-1}{(r+1)^2}\right]\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{\frac{r+1}{2}}|^2\d x\nonumber\\&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\d x+\frac{r-1}{4}\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-3}|\nabla|\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|^2\d x,
\end{align}
may not be useful in the context of bounded domains. The authors in \cite{MRTZ} showed the existence and uniqueness of strong solutions to stochastic 3D tamed Navier-Stokes equations on bounded domains with Dirichlet boundary conditions. They also  proved a small time large deviation principle for the solution. The author in \cite{BYo} proved the existence of a random attractor for the three-dimensional damped Navier-Stokes equations in bounded domains with additive noise by verifying the pullback flattening property. The existence of a random attractor  ($r>3$, for any $\beta>0$) as well as the existence of a unique invariant measure ($3<r\leq 5$, for any $\beta>0$ and $\beta\geq\frac{1}{2}$ for $r=3$) for the stochastic 3D Navier-Stokes equations with damping driven by a multiplicative noise is established in the paper \cite{LHGH}. By using classical Faedo-Galerkin approximation and compactness method, the existence of martingale solutions for the stochastic 3D Navier-Stokes equations with nonlinear damping is obtained in \cite{LHGH1}.  The works \cite{LHGH2,ZDRZ}, etc considered various stochastic problems related to the equations similar to stochastic CBF equations in bounded domains with Dirichlet boundary conditions. As far as strong solutions are concerned, some of these works proved regularity results in the space given in \eqref{2}, by using the estimate given in \eqref{3}, which may not hold true always. 

In this work, we consider the stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer (SCBF) equations and show the existence and uniqueness of strong solutions in the probabilistic sense in a larger space than \eqref{2} and discuss about some asymptotic behavior. The main motivation of this work comes from the papers \cite{KWH} and \cite{CLF}. The work \cite{KWH} helped us to construct functions that can approximate functions defined on smooth bounded domains  by elements of eigenspaces of Stokes operator in such a way that the approximations are bounded and converge in both Sobolev and Lebesgue spaces simultaneously.  On the $n$-dimensional torus, one can approximate functions in $\mathbb{L}^p$-spaces using truncated Fourier expansions (see \cite{CLF}).   We also got inspiration from the work \cite{GK2}, where the	It\^o formula for processes taking values in intersection	of finitely many Banach spaces has been established. Due to the difficulty explained above, one may  not expect  regularity of $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ given in \eqref{2} in bounded domains. The novelties of this work are: 
\begin{itemize}
	\item The existence and uniqueness of strong solutions to SCBF equations ($r> 3,$ for any $\mu$ and $\beta$, $r=3$ for $2\beta\mu\geq 1$) in bounded domains with $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{L}^2(\mathcal{O})))$ is obtained in the space
	\begin{center} $\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{L}^2(\mathcal{O}))\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H}_0^1(\mathcal{O})))\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\mathbb{L}^{r+1}(\mathcal{O}))),$\end{center} with $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. paths in $\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{L}^2(\mathcal{O}))$. 
	\item The energy equality (It\^o's formula) satisfied by the SCBF equations is established by approximating the strong solution using the finite-dimensional space spanned by the first $n$ eigenfunctions of the Stokes operator.
	\item The exponential stability (in the mean square and almost sure sense) of the stationary solutions is obtained for large $\mu$ and the lower bound on $\mu$ does not depend on the stationary solutions. A stabilization result of the stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer  equations by using a multiplicative noise is also obtained.
	\item  The existence of a unique ergodic and strongly mixing invariant measure for the SCBF  equations perturbed by multiplicative Gaussian noise is established by using the exponential stability of strong solutions. 
\end{itemize}


The organization of the paper is as follows. In the next section, we define the linear and nonlinear operators, and provide the necessary function spaces needed to obtain the global solvability results of the system \eqref{1}. For $r>3$, we show that the sum of linear and nonlinear operators is monotone (Theorem \ref{thm2.2}),  and for $r=3$ and $2\beta\mu\geq 1$, we show that the  sum is globally monotone (Theorem \ref{thm2.3}). The demicontinuity and hence the hemicontinuity property of these operators is also obtained in the same section (Lemma \ref{lem2.8}). The SCBF equations perturbed by Gaussian noise is formulated in section \ref{sec4}. After providing an abstract formulation of the SCBF equations in bounded or periodic domains, we establish the existence and uniqueness of global strong solution by making use of the monotonicity property of the linear and nonlinear operators as well as a stochastic generalization of the Minty-Browder technique (see Proposition \ref{prop1} for a-priori energy estimates and Theorem \ref{exis} for global solvability results). We overcame the major difficulty of establishing the energy equality for the SCBF equations by approximating the solution using the finite-dimensional space spanned by the first $n$ eigenfunctions of the Stokes operator. Due to the  technical difficulties explained earlier, we prove the regularity results of the global strong solutions under smoothness assumptions on the initial data and further assumptions on noise co-efficient, in periodic domains only (Theorem \ref{thm3.10}). The section \ref{se5} is devoted for establishing the exponential stability (in the mean square and almost sure sense) of the stationary solutions (Theorems \ref{exp1} and \ref{exp2}) for large $\mu$. In both Theorems, the lower bound of $\mu$ does not depend on the stationary solutions.  A stabilization result of the stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer  equations by using a multiplicative noise is also obtained in the same section (Theorem \ref{thm4.7}). In the final section, we prove the existence of a unique ergodic and strongly mixing invariant measure for the SCBF  equations by using the exponential stability of strong solutions (Theorem \ref{UEIM}).

\section{Mathematical Formulation}\label{sec3}\setcounter{equation}{0}
The necessary function spaces needed to obtain the global solvability results of the system \eqref{1} is provided in this section. We prove monotonicity as well as hemicontinuity properties of the linear and nonlinear operators in the same section.   In our analysis, the parameter $\alpha$ does not play a major role and we set $\alpha$ to be zero in \eqref{1} in the entire paper.


\subsection{Function spaces} Let $\mathrm{C}_0^{\infty}(\mathcal{O};\mathbb{R}^n)$ be the space of all infinitely differentiable functions  ($\mathbb{R}^n$-valued) with compact support in $\mathcal{O}\subset\mathbb{R}^n$.  Let us define 
\begin{align*} 
\mathcal{V}&:=\{\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}_0^{\infty}(\mathcal{O},\mathbb{R}^n):\nabla\cdot\mathbf{u}=0\},\\
\mathbb{H}&:=\text{the closure of }\ \mathcal{V} \ \text{ in the Lebesgue space } \mathbb{L}^2(\mathcal{O})=\mathrm{L}^2(\mathcal{O};\mathbb{R}^n),\\
\mathbb{V}&:=\text{the closure of }\ \mathcal{V} \ \text{ in the Sobolev space } \mathbb{H}_0^1(\mathcal{O})=\mathrm{H}_0^1(\mathcal{O};\mathbb{R}^n),\\
\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p}&:=\text{the closure of }\ \mathcal{V} \ \text{ in the Lebesgue space } \mathbb{L}^p(\mathcal{O})=\mathrm{L}^p(\mathcal{O};\mathbb{R}^n),
\end{align*}
for $p\in(2,\infty)$. Then under some smoothness assumptions on the boundary, we characterize the spaces $\mathbb{H}$, $\mathbb{V}$ and $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p$ as 
$
\mathbb{H}=\{\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{L}^2(\mathcal{O}):\nabla\cdot\mathbf{u}=0,\mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{n}\big|_{\partial\mathcal{O}}=0\}$,  with norm  $\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2:=\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x,
$
where $\mathbf{n}$ is the outward normal to $\partial\mathcal{O}$,
$
\mathbb{V}=\{\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{H}_0^1(\mathcal{O}):\nabla\cdot\mathbf{u}=0\},$  with norm $ \|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2:=\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x,
$ and $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p=\{\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{L}^p(\mathcal{O}):\nabla\cdot\mathbf{u}=0, \mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{n}\big|_{\partial\mathcal{O}}\},$ with norm $\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p=\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^p\d x$, respectively.
Let $(\cdot,\cdot)$ denotes the inner product in the Hilbert space $\mathbb{H}$ and $\langle \cdot,\cdot\rangle $ denotes the induced duality between the spaces $\mathbb{V}$  and its dual $\mathbb{V}'$ as well as $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p$ and its dual $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p'}$, where $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1$. Note that $\mathbb{H}$ can be identified with its dual $\mathbb{H}'$. We endow the space $\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p}$ with the norm $\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}+\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p}},$ for $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p$ and its dual $\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p'}$ with the norm $$\inf\left\{\max\left(\|\mathbf{v}_1\|_{\mathbb{V}'},\|\mathbf{v}_1\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p'}}\right):\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{v}_1+\mathbf{v}_2, \ \mathbf{v}_1\in\mathbb{V}', \ \mathbf{v}_2\in\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p'}\right\}.$$ Moreover, we have the continuous embedding $\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p\hookrightarrow\mathbb{H}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p'}$. For the functional set up in periodic domains, interested readers are referred to see \cite{Te1,MSS,KWH}, etc. 

\subsection{Linear operator}
Let $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}} : \mathbb{L}^2(\mathcal{O}) \to\mathbb{H}$ denotes the \emph{Helmholtz-Hodge orthogonal projection} (see \cite{OAL,AC}). Let us define
\begin{equation*}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}:&=-\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}\Delta\mathbf{u},\;\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}),\\ \mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}):&=\mathbb{V}\cap\mathbb{H}^{2}(\mathcal{O}).
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation*}
It can be easily seen that the operator $\mathrm{A}$ is a non-negative self-adjoint operator in $\mathbb{H}$ with $\mathbb{V}=\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}^{1/2})$ and \begin{align}\label{2.7a}\langle \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}\rangle =\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2,\ \textrm{ for all }\ \mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{V}, \ \text{ so that }\ \|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\leq \|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}.\end{align}
For a bounded domain $\mathcal{O}$, the operator $\mathrm{A}$ is invertible and its inverse $\mathrm{A}^{-1}$ is bounded, self-adjoint and compact in $\mathbb{H}$. Thus, using spectral theorem, the spectrum of $\mathrm{A}$ consists of an infinite sequence $0< \uplambda_1\leq \lambda_2\leq\ldots\leq \lambda_k\leq \ldots,$ with $\lambda_k\to\infty$ as $k\to\infty$ of eigenvalues. 
\iffalse 
The behavior of these eigenvalues is well known in the literature (for example see Theorem 2.2, Corollary 2.2, \cite{AAI} and for asymptotic behavior, see \cite{PCCF,Te1,AAI1}, etc).  For all $k\geq 1$, we have  
\begin{align}\label{643}
\lambda_k\geq \widetilde{C}k^{2/n}, \ \text{ where }\ 
\widetilde{C}=\frac{n}{2+n}\left(\frac{(2\pi)^n}{\omega_n(n-1)|\mathcal{O}|}\right)^{2/n}, \ \omega_n= \pi^{n/2}\Gamma(1+n/2),
\end{align}  and $|\mathcal{O}|$ is the $n$-dimensional Lebesgue measure of $\mathcal{O}$. For $n=2$, we get $\widetilde{C}=\frac{4\sqrt{\pi}}{|\mathcal{O}|}$ and for $n=3$, we find  $\widetilde{C}=\frac{3^{5/3}\pi^{4/3}k^{2/3}}{5|\mathcal{O}|^{2/3}}$.  
\fi 
Moreover, there exists an orthogonal basis $\{e_k\}_{k=1}^{\infty} $ of $\mathbb{H}$ consisting of eigenvectors of $\mathrm{A}$ such that $\mathrm{A} e_k =\lambda_ke_k$,  for all $ k\in\mathbb{N}$.  We know that $\mathbf{u}$ can be expressed as $\mathbf{u}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\langle\mathbf{u},e_k\rangle e_k$ and $\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\lambda_k\langle\mathbf{u},e_k\rangle e_k$. Thus, it is immediate that 
\begin{align}\label{poin}
\|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2=\langle \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}\rangle =\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\lambda_k|\langle \mathbf{u},e_k\rangle|^2\geq \uplambda_1\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}|\langle\mathbf{u},e_k\rangle|^2=\uplambda_1\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align}
\iffalse 
 In this paper, we also need the fractional powers of $\mathrm{A}$.  For $\mathbf{u}\in \mathbb{H}$ and  $\alpha>0,$ we define
$\mathrm{A}^\alpha \mathbf{u}=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lambda_k^\alpha (\mathbf{u},e_k) e_k,  \ \mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}^\alpha), $ where $\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}^\alpha)=\left\{\mathbf{u}\in \mathbb{H}:\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lambda_k^{2\alpha}|(\mathbf{u},e_k)|^2<+\infty\right\}.$ 
Here  $\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}^\alpha)$ is equipped with the norm 
\begin{equation} \label{fn}
\|\mathrm{A}^\alpha \mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}=\left(\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lambda_k^{2\alpha}|(\mathbf{u},e_k)|^2\right)^{1/2}.
\end{equation}
It can be easily seen that $\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}^0)=\mathbb{H},$  $\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}^{1/2})=\mathbb{V}$. We set $\mathbb{V}_\alpha= \mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}^{\alpha/2})$ with $\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}_{\alpha}} =\|\mathrm{A}^{\alpha/2} \mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}.$   Using Rellich-Kondrachov compactness embedding theorem, we know that for any $0\leq s_1<s_2,$ the embedding $\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}^{s_2})\subset \mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}^{s_1})$ is also compact. Applying H\"older's inequality on the  expression \eqref{fn}, one can obtain the following interpolation estimate:
\begin{equation}\label{ie}
\|\mathrm{A}^{s}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq \|\mathrm{A}^{s_1}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^\theta\|\mathrm{A}^{s_2}\mathbf{u}\|^{1-\theta}_{\mathbb{H}},
\end{equation}
for any real $s_1\leq s\leq s_2$ and $\theta$ is given by $s=s_1\theta+s_2(1-\theta).$  Let us denote by $\mathrm{D}\left(\mathrm{A}^{-\alpha}\right)$, the dual space of  $\mathrm{D}\left(\mathrm{A}^{\alpha}\right)$ and we have the following dense and continuous inclusions, for $\alpha>1/2$,
$$\mathrm{D}\left(\mathrm{A}^{\alpha}\right)\subset\mathbb{V}\subset\mathbb{H}\equiv\mathbb{H}'\subset\mathbb{V}'\subset\mathrm{D}\left(\mathrm{A}^{-\alpha}\right).$$ For negative powers, we also define $\left(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\right)_{\mathbb{V}_{-\alpha}}=\left(\mathrm{A}^{-\alpha/2}\mathbf{u},\mathrm{A}^{-\alpha/2}\mathbf{v}\right)$ and $\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}_{-\alpha}}=\|\mathrm{A}^{-\alpha/2}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}$. 


\begin{remark}
1. An integration by parts and boundary conditions yields 
\begin{align}\label{24}
\langle \Delta\mathbf{u},|\mathbf{u}|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}\rangle&=\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i^2}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}_j(x)\d x\nonumber\\&=\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\partial\mathcal{O}}\frac{\partial\mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}_j(x)\mathbf{n}_i(x)\d x\nonumber\\&\quad-\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}\frac{\partial \mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}(|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-2})\mathbf{u}_j(x)\d x-\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}\right)^2|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-2}\d x\nonumber\\&=-(r-1)\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}\right)^2|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-2}\d x=-(r-1)\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^2}^2,
\end{align}
for $r\geq 2$. 

2. Note that 
\begin{align}
|\nabla(|\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r}{2}})|&=|\nabla((|\mathbf{u}|^2)^{\frac{r}{4}})|=\sum_{k=1}^n\left|\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}(|\mathbf{u}_k|^2)^{\frac{r}{4}}\right|=\frac{r}{2}\sum_{k,j=1}^n\left||\mathbf{u}_k|^{\frac{r}{2}-2}\mathbf{u}_j\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\mathbf{u}_j\right|\leq \frac{r}{2}|\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-2}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}|,
\end{align}
and thus 
$
\|\nabla(|\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r}{2}})\|_{\mathbb{L}^2}\leq \frac{r}{2}\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^2}.
$
Applying Poincar\'e inequality, we further have 
\begin{align}\label{2p6}
\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^r}^r\leq\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r}{2}}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq\frac{1}{\uplambda_1}\|\nabla(|\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r}{2}})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq\frac{r^2}{4\uplambda_1}\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^2}^2,
\end{align}
for all $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\mathbb{L}^r(\mathcal{O})$. 
\end{remark}
\fi

It should be noted that, in this work, we are not using the Gagliardo-Nirenberg, Ladyzhenskaya or Agmon's inequalities. Thus, the results obtained in this work are true for $2\leq n\leq 4$ in bounded domains (see the discussions above \eqref{333}) and $n\geq 2$ in periodic domains. The  following  interpolation inequality is also frequently in the paper.
\iffalse 
	\begin{lemma}[Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, Theorem 2.1, \cite{LN}] \label{gni}
	Let $\mathcal{O}\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ and $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{W}_0^{1,p}(\mathcal{O};\mathbb{R}^n),p\geq 1$. Then, for any fixed number $q,r\geq 1$, there exists a constant $C>0$ depending only on $n,p,q$ such that 
	\begin{align}\label{gg}
	\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^r}\leq C\|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^p}^{\eta}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^q}^{1-\eta},\ \eta\in[0,1],
	\end{align}
	where the numbers $p, q, r$ and $\eta$ are connected by the relation
	$$\eta=\left(\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{r}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}\right)^{-1}.$$
\end{lemma}
\fi 
\iffalse 
For the case $n=2$, taking $p=q=2$ in \eqref{gg}, we get $\eta=1-\frac{2}{r}$ and hence 
\begin{align}\label{2.8}
\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^r}\leq C\|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{1-\frac{2}{r}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{2}{r}}, 
\end{align}
for all $r\in[2,\infty)$. For the case $n=3$, substituting $p=q=2$ in \eqref{gg}, we obtain $\eta=\frac{3}{2}-\frac{3}{r}$  and thus 
\begin{align}\label{2p11}
\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^r}\leq C\|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{3}{r}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{3}{r}},
\end{align}
for $r\in[2,6]$. 
\begin{lemma}[Ladyzhenskaya inequality]
	For $\mathbf{u}\in\ \mathrm{C}_0^{\infty}(\mathrm{G};\mathbb{R}^n), n = 2, 3$, there exists a constant $C$ such that
	\begin{align}
	\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^4(\mathrm{G})}\leq C^{1/4}\|\mathbf{u}\|^{1-\frac{n}{4}}_{\mathbb{L}^2(\mathrm{G})}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|^{\frac{n}{4}}_{\mathbb{L}^2(\mathrm{G})},\text{ for } n=2,3,
	\end{align}
	where $C=2,4$ for $n=2,3$ respectively. 
\end{lemma}
\fi 
Assume $1\leq s\leq r\leq t\leq \infty$, $\theta\in(0,1)$ such that $\frac{1}{r}=\frac{\theta}{s}+\frac{1-\theta}{t}$ and $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{L}^s(\mathcal{O})\cap\mathbb{L}^t(\mathcal{O})$, then we have 
\begin{align}\label{211}
\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^r}\leq\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^s}^{\theta}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{L}^t}^{1-\theta}. 
\end{align}



\subsection{Bilinear operator}
Let us define the \emph{trilinear form} $b(\cdot,\cdot,\cdot):\mathbb{V}\times\mathbb{V}\times\mathbb{V}\to\mathbb{R}$ by $$b(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},\mathbf{w})=\int_{\mathcal{O}}(\mathbf{u}(x)\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{v}(x)\cdot\mathbf{w}(x)\d x=\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}\mathbf{u}_i(x)\frac{\partial \mathbf{v}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}\mathbf{w}_j(x)\d x.$$ If $\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}$ are such that the linear map $b(\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}, \cdot) $ is continuous on $\mathbb{V}$, the corresponding element of $\mathbb{V}'$ is denoted by $\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v})$. We also denote (with an abuse of notation) $\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}) = \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{u})=\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u}$.
An integration by parts gives 
\begin{equation}\label{b0}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
b(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},\mathbf{v}) &= 0,\text{ for all }\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v} \in\mathbb{V},\\
b(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},\mathbf{w}) &=  -b(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{w},\mathbf{v}),\text{ for all }\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},\mathbf{w}\in \mathbb{V}.
\end{aligned}
\right.\end{equation}
In the trilinear form, an application of H\"older's inequality yields
\begin{align*}
|b(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},\mathbf{w})|=|b(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{w},\mathbf{v})|\leq \|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\mathbb{V}},
\end{align*}
for all $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}$ and $\mathbf{w}\in\mathbb{V}$, so that we get 
\begin{align}\label{2p9}
\|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\leq \|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}.
\end{align}
Hence, the trilinear map $b : \mathbb{V}\times\mathbb{V}\times\mathbb{V}\to \mathbb{R}$ has a unique extension to a bounded trilinear map from $(\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})\times(\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}})\times\mathbb{V}$ to $\mathbb{R}$. It can also be seen that $\mathrm{B}$ maps $ \mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$  into $\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}$ and using interpolation inequality (see \eqref{211}), we get 
\begin{align}\label{212}
\left|\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle \right|=\left|b(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u})\right|\leq \|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\leq\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{r+1}{r-1}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{r-3}{r-1}},
\end{align}
for all $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$. Thus, we have 
\begin{align}\label{2.9a}
\|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})\|_{\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}\leq\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{r+1}{r-1}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{r-3}{r-1}}.
\end{align}
\iffalse 
Note that $\mathrm{B}$ also maps $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^6\cap \mathbb{H}$ into $\mathbb{V}'$ and
\begin{align*}
\left|\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle \right|=\left|b(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u})\right|\leq \|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^3}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^6}\|\nabla\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}
\end{align*}
so that 
\begin{align}
\|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u})\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\leq\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^3}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^6}\leq C\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{1/2}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{3/2},
\end{align}
once again, we get an estimate similar to \eqref{2.9a}. 
\fi 
Using \eqref{2p9}, for $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, we also have 
\begin{align}\label{lip}
\|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}&\leq \|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u})\|_{\mathbb{V}'}+\|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\nonumber\\&\leq \left(\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}+\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}\right)\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq \left(\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{r-3}{r-1}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2}{r-1}}+\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{r-3}{r-1}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2}{r-1}}\right)\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}},
\end{align}
for $r>3$, by using the interpolation inequality. For $r=3$, a calculation similar to \eqref{lip} yields 
\begin{align}
\|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{4}{3}}}&\leq \left(\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}}+\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}}\right)\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}},
\end{align}
  hence $\mathrm{B}(\cdot):\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}\to\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{4}{3}}$ is a locally Lipschitz operator. 
\iffalse 
For $r\geq 2$, using an integration by parts, boundary condition and divergence free condition, we estimate $\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),|\mathbf{u}|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}\rangle$ as 
\begin{align}\label{2.12}
\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),|\mathbf{u}|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}\rangle&=\langle (\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u},|\mathbf{u}|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}\rangle=\sum_{i,j,k=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}\mathbf{u}_i(x)\frac{\partial \mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}|\mathbf{u}_k(x)|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}_j(x)\d x\nonumber\\&=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathcal{O}}\mathbf{u}_i(x)|\mathbf{u}_k(x)|^{r-2}\frac{\partial\mathbf{u}_j^2(x)}{\partial x_i}\d x\nonumber\\&=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i,j,k=1}^n\bigg\{\int_{\partial\mathcal{O}}\mathbf{u}_i(x)|\mathbf{u}_k(x)|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}_j^2(x)\mathbf{n}_i(x)\d x-\int_{\mathcal{O}}\frac{\partial\mathbf{u}_i(x)}{\partial x_i}|\mathbf{u}_k(x)|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}_j^2(x)\d x \nonumber\\&\qquad-\int_{\mathcal{O}}\frac{\partial|\mathbf{u}_k(x)|^{r-2}}{\partial x_i}\mathbf{u}_i(x)\mathbf{u}_j^2(x)\d x\bigg\}\nonumber\\&=-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}\frac{\partial|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-2}}{\partial x_i}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\mathbf{u}_i(x)\d x\nonumber\\&=-\frac{(r-2)}{2}\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}_i(x)\frac{\partial\mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}\mathbf{u}_j(x)\d x\nonumber\\&=-\frac{(r-2)}{2}\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),|\mathbf{u}|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}\rangle,
\end{align}
so that we get $\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),|\mathbf{u}|^{r-2}\mathbf{u}\rangle=0$. 
\fi 
\subsection{Nonlinear operator}
Let us now consider the operator $\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}):=\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u})$. It is immediate that $\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{u}\rangle =\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}$ and the map $\mathcal{C}(\cdot):\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}\to\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}$ is Gateaux differentiable with Gateaux derivative $\mathcal{C}'(\mathbf{u})\mathbf{v}=r|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{v},$ for $\mathbf{v}\in\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$. For  $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, using Taylor's formula, we have 
\begin{align}\label{213}
\langle \mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{w}\rangle&\leq \|(|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u})-(|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}\mathbf{v})\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq \sup_{0<\theta<1}r\|(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})|\theta\mathbf{u}+(1-\theta)\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{{\frac{r+1}{r}}}}\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq \sup_{0<\theta<1} r\|\theta\mathbf{u}+(1-\theta)\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r-1}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq r\left(\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}+\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\right)^{r-1}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}},
\end{align}
for all $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},\mathbf{w}\in\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$. 
Thus the operator $\mathcal{C}(\cdot):\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}\to\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}$ is locally Lipschitz. Moreover, 	for any $r\in[1,\infty)$, we have 
\iffalse 
\begin{align}\label{2p13}
&\langle \mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1})-\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{v}|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle\nonumber\\&= r\langle (\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})|\theta\mathbf{u}+(1-\theta)\mathbf{v}|^{r-1},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle \nonumber\\&=r\int_{\mathcal{O}} |\theta\mathbf{u}(x)+(1-\theta)\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r-1}|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\d x\geq 0,
\end{align}
for all $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$. The above estimate can be proved in the following way also:
\fi 
\begin{align}\label{2pp11}
&\langle \mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1})-\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{v}|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle\nonumber\\&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}\left(\mathbf{u}(x)|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}-\mathbf{v}(x)|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r-1}\right)\cdot(\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x))\d x\nonumber\\&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}\left(|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r+1}-|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}(x)\cdot\mathbf{v}(x)-|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}(x)\cdot\mathbf{v}(x)+|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r+1}\right)\d x\nonumber\\&\geq\int_{\mathcal{O}}\left(|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r+1}-|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r}|\mathbf{v}(x)|-|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r}|\mathbf{u}(x)|+|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r+1}\right)\d x\nonumber\\&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}\left(|\mathbf{u}(x)|^r-|\mathbf{v}(x)|^r\right)(|\mathbf{u}(x)|-|\mathbf{v}(x)|)\d x\geq 0. 
\end{align}
Furthermore, we find 
\begin{align}\label{224}
&\langle\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1})-\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{v}|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle\nonumber\\&=\langle|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1},|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}|^2\rangle+\langle|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1},|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}|^2\rangle+\langle\mathbf{v}|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}-\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle\nonumber\\&=\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\||\mathbf{v}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\nonumber\\&\quad+\langle\mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{v},|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}+|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}\rangle-\langle|\mathbf{u}|^2,|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}\rangle-\langle|\mathbf{v}|^2,|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\rangle.
\end{align}
But, we know that 
\begin{align*}
&\langle\mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{v},|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}+|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}\rangle-\langle|\mathbf{u}|^2,|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}\rangle-\langle|\mathbf{v}|^2,|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\rangle\nonumber\\&=-\frac{1}{2}\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\frac{1}{2}\||\mathbf{v}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{2}\langle\left(|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}-|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}\right),\left(|\mathbf{u}|^2-|\mathbf{v}|^2\right)\rangle \nonumber\\&\geq -\frac{1}{2}\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\frac{1}{2}\||\mathbf{v}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align*}
From \eqref{224}, we finally have 
\begin{align}\label{2.23}
&\langle\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1})-\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{v}|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle\geq \frac{1}{2}\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{2}\||\mathbf{v}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0,
\end{align}
for $r\geq 1$. 
\iffalse 
For the critical case $r=3$, we have 
\begin{align}\label{2p23}
&\langle \mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u}|^{2})-\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(\mathbf{v}|\mathbf{v}|^{2}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle\nonumber\\&=\langle \mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u}|^2-\mathbf{v}|\mathbf{v}|^2,\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle =\langle\mathbf{u}(|\mathbf{u}|^2-|\mathbf{v}|^2)+(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})|\mathbf{v}|^2,\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle \nonumber\\&=\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\langle\mathbf{u}\cdot(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),(\mathbf{u}+\mathbf{v})\cdot(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\rangle \nonumber\\&=\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\|\mathbf{u}\cdot(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\langle\mathbf{u}\cdot(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\cdot(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\rangle \nonumber\\&\geq \|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\|\mathbf{u}\cdot(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\|\mathbf{u}\cdot(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}\nonumber\\&\geq\frac{1}{2}\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{2}\|\mathbf{u}\cdot(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq \frac{1}{2}\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0,
\end{align}
where we used Young's inequality. 


Applying integration by parts, we get 
\begin{align}\label{219}
(\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})&=\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}_j(x)\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i^2}\d x\nonumber\\&= -\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\left(\frac{\partial\mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}\right)^2\d x-\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}_j(x)\frac{\partial\mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}\d x\nonumber\\&=-(r-1)\sum_{i,j=1}^n\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\left(\frac{\partial\mathbf{u}_j(x)}{\partial x_i}\right)^2\d x=-(r-1)\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align}

\fi 
\subsection{Monotonicity}
Let us now show the monotonicity as well as the hemicontinuity properties of the linear and nonlinear operators, which plays a crucial role in this paper. 
\begin{definition}[\cite{VB}]
	Let $\mathbb{X}$ be a Banach space and let $\mathbb{X}^{'}$ be its topological dual.
	An operator $\mathrm{G}:\mathrm{D}\rightarrow
	\mathbb{X}^{'},$ $\mathrm{D}=\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{G})\subset \mathbb{X}$ is said to be
	\emph{monotone} if
	$$\langle\mathrm{G}(x)-\mathrm{G}(y),x-y\rangle\geq
	0,\ \text{ for all } \ x,y\in \mathrm{D}.$$ \iffalse 
	The operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ is \emph{maximal monotone} if there is no monotone operator that properly contains it,  that is, if for $x\in\mathbb{X}$ and $w\in\mathbb{X}'$, the inequality $\langle w-\mathrm{G}(x),x-y\rangle\geq 0$, for all $y\in\mathbb{X}$ implies $w=\mathrm{G}(x)$.
	\fi 
	The operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ is said to be \emph{hemicontinuous}, if for all $x, y\in\mathbb{X}$ and $w\in\mathbb{X}',$ $$\lim_{\lambda\to 0}\langle\mathrm{G}(x+\lambda y),w\rangle=\langle\mathrm{G}(x),w\rangle.$$
	The operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ is called \emph{demicontinuous}, if for all $x\in\mathrm{D}$ and $y\in\mathbb{X}$, the functional $x \mapsto\langle \mathrm{G}(x), y\rangle$  is continuous, or in other words, $x_k\to x$ in $\mathbb{X}$ implies $\mathrm{G}(x_k)\xrightarrow{w}\mathrm{G}(x)$ in $\mathbb{X}'$. Clearly demicontinuity implies hemicontinuity. 
\end{definition}
\begin{theorem}\label{thm2.2}
	Let $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, for $r>3$. Then,	for the operator $\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})=\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u})$, we  have 
	\begin{align}\label{fe}
	\langle(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle+\eta\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0,
	\end{align}
	where \begin{align}\label{215}\eta=\frac{r-3}{2\mu(r-1)}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{r-3}}.\end{align} That is, the operator $\mathrm{G}+\eta\mathrm{I}$ is a monotone operator from $\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$ to $\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}$. 
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	We estimate $	\langle\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}-\mathrm{A}\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle $ by	using an integration by parts as
	\begin{align}\label{ae}
	\langle\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}-\mathrm{A}\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle =\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|^2_{\mathbb{V}}.
	\end{align}
	From \eqref{2.23}, we easily have 
	\begin{align}\label{2.27}
	\beta	\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u})-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle \geq \frac{\beta}{2}\||\mathbf{v}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2. 
	\end{align}
	Note that $\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle=0$ and it implies that
	\begin{equation}\label{441}
	\begin{aligned}
	\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle &=\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle +\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle \nonumber\\&=\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle=-\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle.
	\end{aligned}
	\end{equation} 
Using H\"older's and Young's inequalities, we estimate $|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|$ as  
\begin{align}\label{2p28}
|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|&\leq\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{1}{2\mu }\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align}
We take the term $\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$ from \eqref{2p28} and use H\"older's and Young's inequalities to estimate it as (see \cite{KWH} also)
\begin{align}\label{2.29}
&\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{v}(x)|^2|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\d x\nonumber\\&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{v}(x)|^2|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^{\frac{4}{r-1}}|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^{\frac{2(r-3)}{r-1}}\d x\nonumber\\&\leq\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r-1}|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\d x\right)^{\frac{2}{r-1}}\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\d x\right)^{\frac{r-3}{r-1}}\nonumber\\&\leq{\beta\mu }\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r-1}|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\d x\right)+\frac{r-3}{r-1}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{r-3}}\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\d x\right),
\end{align}
for $r>3$. Using \eqref{2.29} in \eqref{2p28}, we find 
\begin{align}\label{2.30}
&|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{\beta}{2}\||\mathbf{v}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{r-3}{2\mu(r-1)}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{r-3}}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align}
Combining \eqref{ae}, \eqref{2.27} and \eqref{2.30}, we get 
\begin{align}
	\langle(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle+\frac{r-3}{2\mu(r-1)}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{(r-3)}}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\geq 0,
\end{align}
for $r>3$ and the estimate \eqref{fe} follows.  
\end{proof} 
\iffalse 
\begin{theorem}\label{thm3.2}
Let $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, for $r\geq 4$. Then,	for the operator $\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})=\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u})$, we  have 
		\begin{align}\label{fes}
	\langle(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle+\frac{C(r-2)}{2(r+1)}\left(\frac{r+4}{\mu (r+1)}\right)^{\frac{r+4}{r-2}}N^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-2}}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0,
	\end{align}
	for all $\mathbf{v}\in\widetilde{\mathbb{B}}_N$, where $\widetilde{\mathbb{B}}_N$ is an $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$-ball of radius $N$, that is,
	$$
	\widetilde{\mathbb{B}}_N:=\big\{\mathbf{z}\in\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}:\|\mathbf{z}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\leq N\big\}.
	$$
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
We estimate $	\langle\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}-\mathrm{A}\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle $ by	using an integration by parts as
	\begin{align}\label{aes}
	\langle\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}-\mathrm{A}\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle =\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|^2_{\mathbb{V}}.
	\end{align}
Note that $\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle=0$ and it implies 
	\begin{equation}\label{44}
	\begin{aligned}
	\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle &=\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle +\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle \nonumber\\&=\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle=-\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle.
	\end{aligned}
	\end{equation} 
Applying  H\"older's, Gagliardo-Nirenberg (see \ref{2p11})and Young's inequalities, we estimate the term $|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|$ as 
	\begin{align}\label{bes}
	|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|&\leq\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq C\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{\frac{r+4}{r+1}}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{r-2}{r+1}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{C(r-2)}{2(r+1)}\left(\frac{r+4}{\mu (r+1)}\right)^{\frac{r+4}{r-2}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-2}}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
	\end{align}
	for $r\geq 4$. 
	From the estimate \eqref{2p13}, we also have 
	\begin{align}\label{ces}
	\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u})-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle \geq 0.
	\end{align}
	Combining (\ref{aes})-(\ref{ces}), we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{228}
	\langle(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle+\frac{C(r-2)}{2(r+1)}\left(\frac{r+4}{\mu (r+1)}\right)^{\frac{r+4}{r-2}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-2}}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0.
	\end{align}
	Since $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{B}_N$, we finally arrive at (\ref{fes}). 
\end{proof}


\begin{corollary}\label{mon1}
	For any $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0, T ; \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),$ with $r\geq 4$ and any continuous function $\rho(t)\geq 0$, $t\in(0,T)$, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{3.11}
	&\int_0^Te^{-\rho(t)}\Big[\mu \langle \mathrm{A}(\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle +\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \nonumber\\&\qquad+\beta\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \Big]\d t \nonumber\\&\quad+ \frac{C(r-2)}{2(r+1)}\left(\frac{r+4}{\mu (r+1)}\right)^{\frac{r+4}{r-2}}\int_0^Te^{-\rho(t)}\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-2}}_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\geq \frac{\mu }{2}\int_0^Te^{-\rho(t)}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\geq 0.
	\end{align}
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
	Multiplying (\ref{228}) with $e^{-\rho(t)}$, integrating over time $t\in(0,T)$ , we obtain (\ref{3.11}). 
\end{proof}
\fi 
\begin{theorem}\label{thm2.3}
	For the critical case $r=3$ with $2\beta\mu \geq 1$, the operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot):\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}\to \mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}$ is globally monotone, that is, for all $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}$, we have 
\begin{align}\label{218}\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle\geq 0.\end{align}
	\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
From \eqref{2.23}, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{231}
\beta\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u})-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle\geq\frac{\beta}{2}\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2. 
\end{align}
We estimate $|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|$ using H\"older's and Young's inequalities as 
\begin{align}\label{232}
|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|\leq\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}} \leq\mu \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{1}{4\mu }\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align}
Combining \eqref{ae}, \eqref{231} and \eqref{232}, we obtain 
\begin{align}
	\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle\geq\frac{1}{2}\left(\beta-\frac{1}{2\mu }\right)\|\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0,
\end{align}
provided $2\beta\mu \geq 1$. 
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
1. 	As in \cite{YZ}, for $r\geq 3$, one can estimate $|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|$ as 
	\begin{align}\label{2.26}
&	|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|\nonumber\\&\leq \mu \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{1}{4\mu }\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{v}(x)|^2|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\d x\nonumber\\&= \mu \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{1}{4\mu }\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\left(|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r-1}+1\right)\frac{|\mathbf{v}(x)|^2}{|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r-1}+1}\d x\nonumber\\&\leq \mu \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{1}{4\mu }\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{v}(x)|^{r-1}|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\d x+\frac{1}{4\mu }\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)-\mathbf{v}(x)|^2\d x,
	\end{align}
	where we used the fact that $\left\|\frac{|\mathbf{v}|^2}{|\mathbf{v}|^{r-1}+1}\right\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\infty}}<1$, for $r\geq 3$. The above estimate also yields the global monotonicity result given in \eqref{218}, provided $2\beta\mu \geq 1$. 
	
	2. For $n=2$ and $r= 3$, one can estimate $|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|$ using H\"older's, Ladyzhenskaya and Young's inequalities  as 
	\begin{align}\label{2.21}
	|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|&\leq \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^4}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^4}\nonumber\\&\leq 2^{1/4}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{1/2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{3/2}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^4}\nonumber\\&\leq  \frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{27}{32\mu ^3}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^4\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
	\end{align}
	Combining \eqref{ae}, \eqref{2.27} and \eqref{2.21}, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{fe2}
	\langle(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle+ \frac{27}{32\mu ^3}N^4\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0,
	\end{align}
	for all $\mathbf{v}\in\widehat{\mathbb{B}}_N$, where $\widehat{\mathbb{B}}_N$ is an $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4$-ball of radius $N$, that is,
	$
	\widehat{\mathbb{B}}_N:=\big\{\mathbf{z}\in\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4:\|\mathbf{z}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}\leq N\big\}.
	$ Thus, the operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ is locally monotone in this case (see \cite{MJSS,MTM}, etc). 
	\end{remark}
	\iffalse 
\begin{remark}\label{rem2.7}
	1. The term $|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|$ can be estimated in the following way also. 
	\begin{align}\label{2.28}
	|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|&\leq \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{L}^4}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{L}^4}\nonumber\\&\leq 4^{1/4}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{1/4}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{7/4}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\nonumber\\&\leq  \frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+2\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^8\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.	\end{align}
	and we get 
		\begin{align}
		\label{223}
		\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle+2\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^8\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2 \geq \frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2.
	\end{align}
Thus, we obtain	the local monotonicity property of the operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ as 
	\begin{align}\label{fes1}
\langle(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle +2\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7N^8\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0,
\end{align}
for all $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{B}_N$, where $\mathbb{B}_N$ is an $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4$-ball of radius $N$, i.e., 
$
\mathbb{B}_N:=\big\{\mathbf{z}\in\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4:\|\mathbf{z}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}\leq N\big\}.
$

2. 	For any $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4)\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+3}(0, T ; \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+3}),$ where $2\leq r<3$ and any continuous function $\rho(t)\geq 0$, $t\in(0,T)$, we have
\begin{align}\label{233}
&\int_0^Te^{-\rho(t)}\Big[\mu \langle \mathrm{A}(\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle +\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \Big]\d t + 2\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7\int_0^Te^{-\rho(t)}\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|^8_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\geq \frac{\mu }{2}\int_0^Te^{-\rho(t)}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\geq 0.
\end{align}
For $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{6}(0, T ; \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{6}),$ where $3\leq r<5$, the inequality \eqref{3.11} can be used. 

For $n=2$, one can estimate $|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|$ using H\"older's, Ladyzhenskaya and Young's inequalities  as 
	\begin{align}\label{221}
|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|&\leq \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{L}^4}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{L}^4}\nonumber\\&\leq 2^{1/4}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{1/2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{3/2}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\nonumber\\&\leq  \frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{27}{32\mu ^3}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^4\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align}
Combining \eqref{aes}, \eqref{ces} and \eqref{221}, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{fes2}
\langle(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\rangle+ \frac{27}{32\mu ^3}N^4\|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0,
\end{align}
for all $\mathbf{v}\in\widehat{\mathbb{B}}_N$, where $\widehat{\mathbb{B}}_N$ is an $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4$-ball of radius $N$, that is,
$
\widehat{\mathbb{B}}_N:=\big\{\mathbf{z}\in\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4:\|\mathbf{z}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}\leq N\big\}.
$
\end{remark}
\fi 
\begin{lemma}\label{lem2.8}
	The operator $\mathrm{G}:\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}\to \mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}$ is demicontinuous. 
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
	Let us take a sequence $\mathbf{u}^n\to \mathbf{u}$ in $\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$. For any $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, we consider 
	\begin{align}\label{214}
	\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle &=\mu \langle \mathrm{A}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathrm{A}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle+\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle-\beta\langle \mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle.
	\end{align} 
	Next, we take $\langle \mathrm{A}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathrm{A}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle$ from \eqref{214} and estimate it as 
	\begin{align}
	|\langle \mathrm{A}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathrm{A}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|=|(\nabla(\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u}),\nabla\mathbf{v})|\leq\|\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\to 0, \ \text{ as } \ n\to\infty, 
	\end{align}
	since $\mathbf{u}^n\to \mathbf{u}$ in $\mathbb{V}$. We estimate the term $\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle$ from \eqref{214} using H\"older's inequality as 
H\"older's inequality as 
\begin{align}
|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|&=|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n,\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle+\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|\nonumber\\&
\leq|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n,\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u}\rangle|+|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{u}\rangle|\nonumber\\&\leq\left(\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}+\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}\right)\|\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\nonumber\\&\leq \left(\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{r-3}{r-1}}\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2}{r-1}}+\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{r-3}{r-1}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2}{r-1}}\right)\|\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\nonumber\\& \to 0, \ \text{ as } \ n\to\infty, 
\end{align}
since $\mathbf{u}^n\to\mathbf{u}$ in $\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{r+1}$ and $\mathbf{u}^n,\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{r+1}$. Finally, we estimate the term $\langle \mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle$ from \eqref{214} using Taylor's formula and H\"older's inequality as 
		\begin{align}
		|\langle \mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle|&\leq \sup_{0<\theta<1} r\|(\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u})|\theta\mathbf{u}^n+(1-\theta)\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq r\|\mathbf{u}^n-\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\left(\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}+\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\right)^{r-1}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\to 0, \ \text{ as } \ n\to\infty, 
		\end{align}
		since $\mathbf{u}^n\to\mathbf{u}$ in $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$ and $\mathbf{u}^n,\mathbf{u}\in\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, for $r\geq 3$. From the above convergences, it is immediate that $\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n)-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}\rangle \to 0$, for all $\mathbf{v}\in \mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$.
Hence the operator $\mathrm{G}:\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}\to \mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}$ is demicontinuous, which implies that the operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ is also hemicontinuous. 
\end{proof}

\iffalse 

\subsection{Properties of the kernel  $\beta(\cdot)$}
We now discuss some properties of a general kernel $\beta(\cdot)$ and then in particular we restrict ourselves to $\beta(t)=\gamma e^{-\delta t}$. Let us define $$\displaystyle(L\mathbf{u})(t):=(\beta*\mathbf{u})(t)=\int_0^t\beta(t-s)\mathbf{u}(s)\d s.$$ A function $\beta(\cdot)$ is called \emph{positive kernel} if the operator $L$ is positive on $\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})$ for all $T$. That is,
$$\int_0^T(L\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{u}(t))\d t=\int_0^T\int_0^t\beta(t-s)(\mathbf{u}(s),\mathbf{u}(t))\d s\d t\geq 0,\text{ for all }\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{H}\text{ and every } T>0.$$ 
Let $\widehat{\beta}(\theta)$ be the \emph{Laplace transform} of $\beta(t)$, i.e., $$\widehat{\beta}(\theta)=\mathscr{L}[\beta(\theta)]=\int_0^{\infty}e^{-\theta r}\beta(r)\d r,\;\theta\in\mathbb{C}.$$ Then, we have 
\begin{lemma}[Lemma 4.1, \cite{VB}]\label{lem2.2}
	Let $\beta\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,\infty)$ be such that $$\text{Re }\widehat{\beta}(\theta)>0, \ \text{ in }\ \text{Re }\theta>0.$$ Then, $\beta(t)$ defines a \emph{positive kernel}. 
\end{lemma}
Also, $\beta(\cdot)$ is said to be a \emph{strongly positive kernel} if there exists constants $\varepsilon>0$ and $\alpha>0$ such that $\beta(t)-\varepsilon e^{-\alpha t}$ is a positive kernel, that is,
\begin{align}\label{pos}\int_0^T\int_0^t\beta(t-s)(\mathbf{u}(s),\mathbf{u}(t))\d s\d t\geq \varepsilon \int_0^T\int_0^te^{-\alpha(t-s)}(\mathbf{u}(s),\mathbf{u}(t))\d s\d t\geq 0,\end{align} for all $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})$. 
\begin{lemma}[Proposition 4.1, \cite{VB}]\label{lem2.3}
	Let $\beta(t)$ satisfy the following conditions: 
	\begin{enumerate}
		\item [(i)] $\beta\in\mathrm{C}[0,\infty)\cap\mathrm{C}^2(0,\infty)$,
		\item [(ii)] $\displaystyle(-1)^k\frac{\d^k}{\d t^k}\beta(t)\geq 0, \ \text{ for } t>0$, \ $ k=0,1,2$,
		\item [(iii)] $\beta(t)\neq \text{constant}$.
	\end{enumerate}
	Then $\beta(t)$ is a \emph{strongly positive kernel}. 
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}\label{lem2.5}
	Let $\beta\in\mathrm{L}^1(0,T),$ \ $f,g\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T)$, for some $T>0$. Then, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{2.11a}
	\left(\int_0^Tg(t)^2\left(\int_0^t\beta(t-s)f(s)\d s\right)^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\leq\left(\int_0^T|\beta(t)|\d t\right)\left(\int_0^Tg(t)^2f(t)^2\d t\right)^{1/2}.
	\end{align}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
	With a change of variable and change of integrals, it can be easily seen that
	\begin{align}
	\int_0^Tg(t)^2\left(\int_0^t\beta(t-s)f(s)\d s\right)^2\d t&= \int_0^Tg(t)^2\left(\int_0^t\beta(s)f(t-s)\d s\right)^2 \d t\nonumber\\& = \int_0^Tg(t)^2\left(\int_0^t\beta(s)f(t-s)\d s\right)\left(\int_0^t\beta(r)f(t-r)\d r\right)\d t\nonumber\\& =\int_0^T\beta(s)\int_s^Tg(t)^2f(t-s)\int_0^t \beta(r)f(t-r)\d r\d t\d s\nonumber\\&\leq \int_0^T|\beta(s)|\int_0^Tg(t)^2|f(t)|\int_0^t|\beta(r)||f(t-r)|\d r\d t\d s\nonumber\\&\leq \int_0^T|\beta(s)|\int_0^T|\beta(r)|\int_t^Tg(t)^2|f(t)||f(t-r)|\d t\d r\d s\nonumber\\&\leq \left(\int_0^T|\beta(s)|\d s\right)^2\left(\int_0^Tg(t)^2f(t)^2\d t\right),
	\end{align}
	which completes the proof. 
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
	If we take $g(t)=1$ and $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})$ in (\ref{2.11a}), we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{2.11}
	\left(\int_0^T\left(\int_0^t\beta(t-s)\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\d s\right)^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\leq\left(\int_0^T|\beta(t)|\d t\right)\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}.
	\end{align}
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
	For $\beta(t)=\gamma e^{-\delta t}$, we know that $$\int_0^{\infty}\beta(t)\d t=\frac{\gamma}{\delta}\text{ and }\widehat{\beta}(\theta)=\frac{\gamma}{\theta+\delta}>0, \ \text{ for Re }\theta>0,$$ and by Lemma \ref{lem2.2}, $\beta(t)$ is a positive kernel. Using Lemma \ref{lem2.3}, we get $\beta(t)$ is also a strongly positive kernel.  Thus, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{2.10}
	\int_0^T\langle (\beta*\mathrm{A})\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle \d t=\int_0^T((\beta*\nabla\mathbf{u})(t),\nabla\mathbf{u}(t))\d t\geq 0.
	\end{align}
	Using (\ref{2.7a}), we know that 
	\begin{align}
	\|(\beta*\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\leq\int_0^t\beta(t-s)\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\d s\leq \int_0^t\beta(t-s)\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}\d s,
	\end{align}
	and hence by using  (\ref{2.11}) (see Lemma \ref{lem2.5}), we have 
	\begin{align}\label{2.13}
	\int_0^T\|(\beta*\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d t&\leq \int_0^T\left(\int_0^t\beta(t-s)\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}\d s\right)^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq \left(\int_0^T\beta(t)\d t\right)^2\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)\leq \frac{\gamma^2}{\delta^2}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right),
	\end{align}
	for $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})$.  Also, using H\"older's inequality, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{2.13b}
	\|(\beta*\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}&\leq \int_0^t\beta(t-s)\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\d s\leq \left(\int_0^t[\beta(t-s)]^2\d s\right)^{1/2}\left(\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right)^{1/2}\nonumber\\ & \leq \frac{\gamma}{\sqrt{2\delta}}\left(\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right)^{1/2},
	\end{align}
	and 
	\begin{align}\label{2.13a}
	\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|(\beta*\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\leq \sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}} \int_0^t\beta(t-s)\d s\leq \frac{\gamma}{\delta}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}.
	\end{align}
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
	Using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, H\"older's inequality and (\ref{2.13}), we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{2.15}
	\int_0^t\langle (\beta*\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle \d s&\leq \left(\int_0^t\|\beta*\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right)^{1/2}\left(\int_0^t\|\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right)^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\leq \left(\int_0^t\beta(s)\d s\right)\left(\int_0^t\|\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right)\leq \frac{\gamma}{\delta}\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s.
	\end{align}
\end{remark}
Now, we state an important positivity result, which is used frequently in the paper.  
\begin{lemma}\label{lem}
	Let $\beta(t)=\gamma e^{-\delta t},\delta>0,$ \ $t\in[0,T]$. Then, for any continuous function $f(t):[0,T]\to[0,\infty)$, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{a1}\int_0^Tf(t)((\beta*\mathbf{u})(t),\mathbf{u}(t))\d t\geq 0,\end{align}
	for all $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})$.
\end{lemma}
In fact Lemma \ref{lem} is true for any strongly positive kernel (see \cite{MoSS2} for more details). 
For completeness, we give a proof for an elementary version of the above lemma. Let us first provide a result on the positivity of a class of Riemann–Stieltjes integrals (see \cite{JLM} also).  Remember that if $g$ is of bounded variation, then there exist nondecreasing functions $g^+=\max\{g,0\}$
and $g^-=-\min\{g,0\}$
such
that $g = g^{+}-g^{-}$. 
Therefore, finite $\lim\limits_{x\to y^+} g(x)$ and $\lim\limits_{x\to y^-} g(x)$ exist for any $y \in[a, b]$. 
\begin{lemma}\label{lemA1}
	Let $f:[a,b]\to(0,\infty)$ be a continuous function and $g:[a,b]\to[0,\infty)$ be non-vanishing and satisfies $g(a)=0$.  For any $y \in (a, b]$, if $g^+(y)>0$ and $g^-(y)=0$, then the
	Riemann–Stieltjes integral
	\begin{align}\label{A11}\int_a^yf(x)\d g(x)=\int_a^yf(x)\d g^+(x)-\int_a^yf(x)\d g^-(x),\end{align} is positive. 
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
	Since $f$ is continuous and under our assumptions $$0<\min\limits_{x\in[a,b]} f(x)\leq f(x)\leq \max\limits_{x\in[a,b]} f(x)<+\infty.$$ Since $g(a) = 0$, we may assume that $g^+$	and $g^-$
	are nonnegative and satisfy $g^{\pm}(a)=0$. If $g^+(y)>0$ and $g^-(y)=0$, then the integral \eqref{A11} is at least $$g^+(y)\min\limits_{x\in[a,y]}f(x)>0,$$ which completes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Lemma A.3, \cite{MoSS2}]\label{lem_ap}
	Let $a(t)=e^{-\rho t},$ $\rho>0$,  $t\in[0,T]$. Then, for any  continuous function $f:[0,T]\to[0,\infty)$ and for $g:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}$ such that $(a*g)(\cdot)$ is  well defined, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{a21}\int_0^Tf(t)(a*g)(t)g(t)\d t\geq 0.\end{align}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof} Let us use the definition of $(a*g)(\cdot)$ to get 
	\begin{align}\label{a2}
	\frac{\d }{\d t}\left[(a*g)(t)\right]=\int_0^ta'(t-s)g(s)\d s+a(0)g(t)=(a'*g)(t)+g(t).
	\end{align}
	Making use of (\ref{a2}), we have
	\begin{align}\label{a3}
	\int_0^Tf(t)(a*g)(t)g(t)\d t&=\frac{1}{2}\int_0^Tf(t)\d\left[\left((a*g)(t)\right)^2\right]-\int_0^Tf(t)(a*g)(t)(a'*g)(t)\d t\nonumber\\&=\frac{1}{2}\int_0^Tf(t)\d\left[\left((a*g)(t)\right)^2\right]+\rho\int_0^Tf(t)((a*g)(t))^2\d t.
	\end{align}
	Using the positivity of $f$, continuity of $((a*g)(\cdot))^2$ and Lemma \ref{lemA1} (note that $(a*g)(0)=0$), we infer that the right hand side of the equality \eqref{a3} is greater than or equal to $ 0$ 
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
	In order to find the adjoint of $(\beta*f)(\cdot)$, we change the order of integration to get 
	\begin{align}\label{329}
	\int_0^T((\beta*f)(t),g(t))\d t&=\int_0^T\int_0^t\beta(t-s)(f(s),g(t))\d s\d t\nonumber\\&=\int_0^T\int_t^T\beta(s-t)(f(t),g(s))\d s\d t=\int_0^T(f(t),(\beta\circ g)(t))\d t,
	\end{align}
	where $(\beta\circ g)(t)=\int_t^T\beta(s-t)g(s)\d s$ is the adjoint of $(\beta*f)(t)$.
\end{remark}



\fi 

\iffalse 

\subsection{Abstract formulation and weak solution} We take the Helmholtz-Hodge orthogonal projection $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}$ in \eqref{1} to obtain  the abstract formulation for  $t\in(0,T)$ as: 
\begin{equation}\label{kvf}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
\frac{\d\mathbf{u}(t)}{\d t}+\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))&=\mathbf{f}(t),\\
\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1},
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
for $r\geq 3$, where $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')$. Strictly speaking one should use $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}\mathbf{f}$ instead of $\mathbf{f}$, for simplicity, we use $\mathbf{f}$. Let us now provide the definition of \emph{weak solution} of the system \eqref{kvf} for $r\geq 3$.
\begin{definition}\label{weakd}
For $r\geq 3$,	a function  $$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),$$  with $\partial_t\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}')+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\mathbb{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}),$  is called a \emph{weak solution} to the system (\ref{kvf}), if for $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')$, $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ satisfies:
	\begin{equation}\label{3.13}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\langle\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t)+\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t)),\mathbf{v}\rangle&=\langle\mathbf{f}(t),\mathbf{v}\rangle,\\
	\lim_{t\downarrow 0}\int_{\mathcal{O}}\mathbf{u}(t)\mathbf{v}\d x&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}\mathbf{u}_0\mathbf{v}\d x,
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
	and the energy equality:
	\begin{align}\label{237}
	\frac{1}{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}+\mu \|\mathbf{u}(t)\|^2_{\mathbb{V}}+\beta\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}=\langle \mathbf{f}(t),\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle.
	\end{align}
\end{definition}
\iffalse 
\begin{definition}
	For $r\in[2,3)$,	a function  $$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4)\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+3}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+3}),$$  with $\partial_t\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}')+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\mathbb{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}),$  is called a \emph{weak solution} to the system (\ref{kvf}), if for $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')\cap\mathrm{L}^{4}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4})$, $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4$ and $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ satisfies \eqref{3.13} 
	and the energy equalities \eqref{237} and 
	\begin{align}\label{238}
	\frac{1}{4}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}}^{4}+3\mu  \|\mathbf{u}(t)\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\beta\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+3}}^{r+3}=\langle \mathbf{f}(t),|\mathbf{u}(t)|^{2}\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle.
	\end{align}
\end{definition}

\begin{definition}
	For $r\in[3,5)$,	a function  $$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{6}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{6}),$$  with $\partial_t\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}')+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\mathbb{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}),$  is called a \emph{weak solution} to the system (\ref{kvf}), if for $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')\cap\mathrm{L}^{7-r}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r})$, $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r}$ and $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ satisfies \eqref{3.13} 
	and the energy equalities \eqref{237} and 
	\begin{align}\label{2.38}
	\frac{1}{7-r}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r}}^{7-r}+(6-r)\mu  \||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{5-r}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\beta\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{6}}^{6}=\langle \mathbf{f}(t),|\mathbf{u}(t)|^{5-r}\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle.
	\end{align}
\end{definition}
\fi 





\subsection{Energy estimates}\label{sec2.3}
Let
$\{e_1,\ldots,e_n,\ldots\}$ be a complete orthonormal system in
$\mathbb{H}$ belonging to $\mathbb{V}$ and let $\mathbb{H}_n$ be the
$n$-dimensional subspace of $\mathbb{H}$. Let $\mathrm{P}_n$ denote
the orthogonal projection of $\mathbb{V}'$ to $\mathbb{H}_n$, that is, $\mathrm{P}_n\mathbf{x}=\sum_{i=1}^n\langle \mathbf{x},e_i\rangle e_i$. Since every element $\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{H}$ induces a functional $\mathbf{x}^*\in\mathbb{H}$  by the formula $\langle \mathbf{x}^*,\mathbf{y}\rangle =(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y})$, $\mathbf{y}\in\mathbb{V}$, then $\mathrm{P}_n\big|_{\mathbb{H}}$, the orthogonal projection of $\mathbb{H}$ onto $\mathbb{H}_n$  is given by $\mathrm{P}_n\mathbf{x}=\sum_{i=1}^n\left(\mathbf{x},e_i\right)e_i$. Hence in particular, $\mathrm{P}_n$ is the orthogonal projection from $\mathbb{H}$ onto $\text{span}\{e_1,\ldots,e_n\}$.  We define $\mathrm{B}^n(\mathbf{u}^n)=\mathrm{P}_n\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n)$, $\mathcal{C}^n(\mathbf{u}^n)=\mathrm{P}_n\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}^n)$
and $\mathbf{f}^n=\mathrm{P}_n\mathbf{f}$.

With the above setting, let us now consider the following system of ODEs:
\begin{equation}\label{411}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
\left(\partial_t\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}\right)&=-(\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}^n(t)+\mathrm{B}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(t))+\mathcal{C}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v})+(\mathbf{f}^n(t),\mathbf{v}),\\
(\mathbf{u}^n(0),\mathbf{v})&=(\mathbf{u}_0^n,\mathbf{v}),
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
with $\mathbf{u}_0^n=\mathrm{P}_n\mathbf{u}_0,$ for all $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{H}_n$. 
Since $\mathrm{B}^n(\cdot)$ and $\mathcal{C}^n(\cdot)$ are locally Lipschitz (see \eqref{lip} and \eqref{213}), the system  \eqref{411} has a unique local solution $\mathbf{u}^n\in\mathrm{C}([0,T^*];\mathbb{H}_n)$, (existence due to Carath\'eodory's existence theorem and uniqueness is immediate from the local Lipschitz property). Let us now establish the energy estimates satisfied by the system \eqref{411}. Note that the en energy estimate is true for any $r\in[1,\infty)$.
\begin{proposition}\label{prop4.5}
	Let $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')$  be given. Then, for $r\in[1,\infty)$, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{energy1}
	\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t+2\beta\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\leq \|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d t.
	\end{align}
\end{proposition} 
\begin{proof}
	Let us take inner product with $\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)$ to the system \eqref{411} to obtain 
	\begin{align*}
	&\frac{1}{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\beta\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}=(\mathbf{f}^n(t),\mathbf{u}^n(t)),
	\end{align*}
	where we performed an integration by parts and used the fact that $(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n),\mathbf{u}^n)=0$. Let us integrate the inequality from $0$ to $t$ to find 
	\begin{align}\label{415}
	&\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\nonumber\\&= \|\mathbf{u}^n_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2 \int_0^t(\mathbf{f}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d s.
	\end{align}
	Using Cauchy-Schwarz and Young's inequalities, we estimate $|(\mathbf{f}^n,\mathbf{u}^n)|$ as 
	\begin{align*}
	|(\mathbf{f}^n,\mathbf{u}^n)|\leq \|\mathbf{f}^n\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\mathbb{V}}\leq \frac{1}{2\mu }\|\mathbf{f}^n\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2+\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2.
	\end{align*}
	Thus, using the fact that $\|\mathbf{u}_0^n\|_{\mathbb{V}}=\|\mathrm{P}_n\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}\leq \|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}$ and $\|\mathbf{f}^n\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\leq \|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}$ in \eqref{415}, we infer that 
	\begin{align}\label{417}
	&\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\leq \|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d s,
	\end{align}
for all $t\in[0,T]$	 and \eqref{energy1} follows. 
\end{proof}




\iffalse 
\begin{proposition}\label{prop45}
Let $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')\cap\mathrm{L}^{4}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4})$  be given. Then, for $r\in[2,3)$,	we have 
	\begin{align}\label{energy2}
	&\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}}^{4}+6\mu \int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}^n(t)|\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+4\beta \int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+3}}^{r+3}\d t\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}}^{4}+\frac{8}{\mu ^3\uplambda_1^3}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}}^{4}\d t.
	\end{align} 
	
Let $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')\cap\mathrm{L}^{7-r}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r})$  be given. Then, for $r\in[3,5)$,	we have 
\begin{align}\label{energy2a}
&\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r}}^{7-r}+\frac{\mu (7-r)(6-r)}{2}\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}^n(t)|^{\frac{5-r}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+4\beta \int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{6}}^{6}\d t\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r}}^{7-r}+\frac{(7-r)^{6-r}}{(2\mu \uplambda_1)^{6-r}}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r}}^{7-r}\d t.
\end{align} 
\end{proposition} 
\begin{proof}
For $p\geq 2$, taking inner product with $|\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)|^{p-2}\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)$ to the system \eqref{411}, we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{239}
\frac{1}{p}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p+\mu (p-1)\||\mathbf{u}^n(t)|^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\beta\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+p-1}}^{r+p-1}=( \mathbf{f}^n(t),|\mathbf{u}^n(t)|^{p-2}\mathbf{u}^n(t)),
\end{align}
where we used  \eqref{24} and \eqref{2.12} also. Once again using H\"older's and Young's inequalities, we estimate $|(\mathbf{f}^n,|\mathbf{u}^n|^{p-2}\mathbf{u}^n)|$ as 
\begin{align}\label{240}
|(\mathbf{f}^n,|\mathbf{u}^n|^{p-2}\mathbf{u}^n)|&\leq\|\mathbf{f}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p}}^{p-1}\leq \frac{2\mu (p-1)\uplambda_1}{p^2}\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p+\frac{p^{p-2}}{(2\mu \uplambda_1)^{p-1}}\|\mathbf{f}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{\mu (p-1)}{2}\||\mathbf{u}^n|^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{p^{p-2}}{(2\mu \uplambda_1)^{p-1}}\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p,
\end{align}
where we used \eqref{2p6} also. Using \eqref{240} in \eqref{239} and the integrating from $0$ to $t$, we find 
\begin{align}
&\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p+\frac{\mu  p(p-1)}{2}\int_0^t\||\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\beta p\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+p-1}}^{r+p-1}\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p+\frac{p^{p-1}}{(2\mu \uplambda_1)^{p-1}}\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\d s, 
\end{align} 
for all $t\in[0,T]$. Hence the estimate \eqref{energy2} follows by taking $p=4$ and the estimate \eqref{energy2a} follows by taking $p=7-r$.  
\end{proof}

\fi 







\subsection{Global existence and uniqueness} Let us now show that the system \eqref{kvf} has a unique weak solution by making use of Galerkin approximation technique and energy estimates obtained in the previous subsection. The mononicity property of the linear and nonlinear operators obtained in Theorem \ref{thm2.2}, and  the Minty-Browder technique are used to obtain global solvability results. 
\begin{theorem}\label{main}
Let $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}')$  be given.  Then  there exists a unique weak solution to the system (\ref{kvf}) satisfying $$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),$$ for $r>3$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
		\noindent\textbf{Part (1). Existence:}  We prove the existence of a weak solution to the system \eqref{kvf}  in the following steps. 
	\vskip 0.1in 
	\noindent\textbf{Step (i):} \emph{Finite-dimensional (Galerkin) approximation of the system (\ref{kvf}):}
	Let $\{e_1,e_2, \ldots\}$ be a complete orthonormal basis in $\mathbb{H}$ belonging to $\mathbb{V}$ as discussed in section \ref{sec2.3}. Let $\mathbb{H}_n$ denotes the $n$-dimensional subspace of $\mathbb{H}$. We consider the following system of ODEs in $\mathbb{H}_n$: 
	\begin{equation}\label{420}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\frac{\d}{\d t}(\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v})+(\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}^n(t)+\mathrm{B}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(t))+\beta\mathcal{C}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v})&=(\mathbf{f}^n(t),\mathbf{v}),\\
	(\mathbf{u}^n(0),\mathbf{v})&=(\mathbf{u}_0^n,\mathbf{v}),
	\end{aligned}
	\right. 
	\end{equation}
	for any $\mathbf{v} \in\mathbb{H}_n$. As in the previous section, we define the operator $\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}):=\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}).$ Then the system \eqref{420} can be rewritten as 
	\begin{equation}\label{421}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\frac{\d}{\d t}(\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v})+(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v})&=(\mathbf{f}^n(t),\mathbf{v}), \\
	(\mathbf{u}^n(0),\mathbf{v})&=(\mathbf{u}_0^n,\mathbf{v}),
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation} 
	for any $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{H}_n$. Let us take the test function as $\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)$ in \eqref{421} to derive the following energy equality: 
	\begin{align}\label{422}
	&	\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\int_0^t(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(s))-\mathbf{f}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d s=\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
	\end{align}
	for any $t\in(0,T)$.  It can also be shown easily that 
	\begin{align}\label{eqn42}
	&e^{-2\eta t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|^2_{\mathbb{H}} +2\int_0^te^{-2\eta s}(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(s))-\mathbf{f}^n(s)+\eta\mathbf{u}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d
	s=\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
	\end{align}
	for any $t\in(0,T]$, where $\eta=\frac{r-3}{r-1}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{r-3}}$.
	
	
	\vskip 0.1in
	\noindent\textbf{Step (ii):} \emph{Weak convergence of the sequences $\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)$ and $\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot))$:} We know that the dual of $\mathrm{L}^1(0,T;\mathbb{H})$ is $\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})$ and $\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})$ (that is,  $\left(\mathrm{L}^1(0,T;\mathbb{H})\right)' \cong \mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})$) and the space $\mathrm{L}^1(0,T;\mathbb{H})$ is separable. Moreover, the spaces $\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})$ and $\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})$ are reflexive.   Making use of   energy estimates in  Proposition \ref{prop4.5} and the Banach-Alaoglu theorem (or Helly's theorem), we can extract subsequences $\{\mathbf{u}^{n_k}(\cdot)\}$ and $\{\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^{n_k}(\cdot))\}$ such that  (for notational convenience, we use $\{\mathbf{u}^{n}(\cdot)\}$ and $\{\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^{n}(\cdot))\}$)
	\begin{equation}\label{3.20}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\mathbf{u}^n&\xrightarrow{w^*}\mathbf{u}\ \text{ in }\ \mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H}),\\
	\mathbf{u}^n&\xrightarrow{w}\mathbf{u}\ \text{ in }\ \mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}),\\
		\mathbf{u}^n&\xrightarrow{w}\mathbf{u}\ \text{ in }\ \mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),\\ 
	\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n)&\xrightarrow{w}\mathrm{G}_0\ \text{ in }\ \mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}')+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}).
	\end{aligned}
	\right.\end{equation}
Note that for $r\geq 3$,	the final convergence in (\ref{3.20}) can be justified using H\"older's inequality, interpolation inequality \eqref{211} and \eqref{energy1} as follows: 
	\begin{align}\label{428}
	&\left|\int_0^T\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d t\right|\nonumber\\&\leq\mu \left|\int_0^T(\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t),\nabla\mathbf{v}(t))\d t\right|+\left|\int_0^T\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}^n(t)\rangle\d t\right|\nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\left|\int_0^T\langle|\mathbf{u}^n(t)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d t\right|\nonumber\\&\leq\mu \int_0^T\|\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\nabla\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\d t+\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}\d t\nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r}\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\d t\nonumber\\&\leq \left[\mu \left(\int_0^T\|\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}+\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{2(r-3)}{r-1}}\d t\right)^{1/2}\right]\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{r}{r+1}}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq \left[\mu \left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}+\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{1}{r-1}}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right)^{\frac{r-3}{2(r-1)}}\right]\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{r}{r+1}}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq C(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}},\mu ,T,\beta,\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')})\left[\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}+\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\right],
	\end{align}
for all $\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})$. Note also that 
	\begin{align*}
	&\left|\int_0^T\langle\partial_t\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d t\right|\nonumber\\&\leq \left|\int_0^T\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d t\right|+\left|\int_0^T\langle\mathbf{f}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d t\right|\nonumber\\&\leq C(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}},\mu ,T,\beta,\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')})\left[\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}+\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\right]\nonumber\\&\quad +\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2},
	\end{align*}
for all $\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})$.  Thus, it is immediate that
\begin{align} \partial_t\mathbf{u}^n\xrightarrow{w}\partial_t\mathbf{u}\ \text{ in } \ \mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}).
\end{align}  Note that $\mathbf{f}^n\to\mathbf{f}$  in $\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')$.  On passing  to limit $n\to\infty$ in (\ref{421}),	the limit $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ satisfies:
	\begin{equation}\label{eqn43}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\frac{\d\mathbf{u}(t)}{\d t}+\mathrm{G}_0(t)&=\mathbf{f}(t), \ \textrm{ in
	}\ \mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}),\\
	\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0.
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
	The above system (\ref{eqn43}) satisfies the following energy equality:
	\begin{align}\label{eqn44}
	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\int_0^t\langle \mathrm{G}_0(s)-\mathbf{f}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle \d
	s=\|\mathbf{u}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
	\end{align}
	for any $t\in (0,T]$. Moreover, we have  the following estimate:
	\begin{align}\label{eqn45}
	&e^{-2\eta t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\int_0^te^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathrm{G}_0(s)-\mathbf{f}(s)+\eta\mathbf{u}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle \d
	s=\|\mathbf{u}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
	\end{align}
	for any $t\in(0,T]$.  Remember that $\mathbf{u}^n(0)=\mathrm{P}_n\mathbf{u}(0)$, and hence the initial	value $\mathbf{u}^n(0)$ converges to $\mathbf{u}(0)$ strongly in $\mathbb{H}$, that is, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{eqn46}
 \lim_{n\to\infty}\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)-\mathbf{u}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}=0.
	\end{align}
	
	
	

\vskip 0.1in

\noindent\textbf{Step (iii).} \emph{Minty-Browder technique:}	For any
$\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H}_m)$ with
$m<n$, using the local monotonicity property (see \eqref{fe}), we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{eqn48}
&\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\left\{\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t))-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}^n(t)\rangle 
+\eta\left(\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}^n(t)\right)\right\}\d
t\geq 0.
\end{align}
Applying the energy equality  (\ref{eqn42}) in \eqref{eqn48}, we find
\begin{align}\label{eqn49}
&\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t))+\eta\mathbf{v}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}^n(t)\rangle \d
t\nonumber\\&\geq
\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t))+\eta\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}^n(t)\rangle \d
t\nonumber\\&=\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}
\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t))+\eta\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \d t
\nonumber\\&\quad+\frac{1}{2}\Big(e^{-2\eta T}\|\mathbf{u}^n(T)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\Big)
-\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathbf{f}^n(t),\mathbf{u}^n(t)\rangle \d t.
\end{align}
Taking limit infimum on both sides of (\ref{eqn49}), we further have 
\begin{align}\label{eqn52}
&\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t))+\eta\mathbf{v}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle \d
t\nonumber\\&\geq \int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}
\langle \mathrm{G}_0(t)+\eta\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \d
t\nonumber\\&\quad+\frac{1}{2}\liminf_{n\to\infty}\Big(e^{-2\eta T}\|\mathbf{u}^n(T)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\Big)
-\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathbf{f}(t),\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle \d t.
\end{align}
Making use of the lower semicontinuity property of the $\mathbb{H}$-norm, and the strong convergence of the initial data (see \eqref{eqn46}), we get 
\begin{align}\label{eqn53}
&\liminf_{n\to\infty}\Big\{e^{-2\eta T}\|\mathbf{u}^n(T)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\Big\}\geq
e^{-2\eta T}\|\mathbf{u}(T)\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}-\|\mathbf{u}(0)\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}.
\end{align}
Applying  (\ref{eqn53}) and the energy equality (\ref{eqn45}) in (\ref{eqn52}), we deduce that 
\begin{align}\label{eqn55}
&\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t))+\eta\mathbf{v}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle \d
t\nonumber\\&\geq \int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}
\langle \mathrm{G}_0(t)+\eta\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \d
t+\frac{1}{2}\Big(	e^{-2\eta T}\|\mathbf{u}(T)\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}-\|\mathbf{u}(0)\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}\Big)
-\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathbf{f}(t),\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle \d
t\nonumber\\&=\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}
\langle \mathrm{G}_0(t)+\eta\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \d
t-\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathrm{G}_0(t)+\eta\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle \d
t\nonumber\\&=\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}
\langle \mathrm{G}_0(t)+\eta\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle \d t.
\end{align}
Note that the estimate (\ref{eqn55}) holds true for any
$\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H}_m)$, $m\in\mathbb{N}$, since the  inequality given in (\ref{eqn55}) is
independent of both $m$ and $n$. Using a density
argument, one can show that the inequality (\ref{eqn55}) remains true for any
$$\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0, T ; \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}).$$ In fact, for any
$\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0, T ; \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),$ there	exists a strongly convergent subsequence
$\mathbf{v}_m\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0, T ; \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),$ that
satisfies the inequality in  (\ref{eqn55}).

Taking $\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{u}+\lambda\mathbf{w}$, $\lambda>0$, where
$\mathbf{w}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0, T ; \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),$ and
substituting for $\mathbf{v}$ in (\ref{eqn55}), we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{eqn56}
\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}(t)+\lambda\mathbf{w}(t))-\mathrm{G}_0(t)+\eta\lambda\mathbf{w}(t),\lambda\mathbf{w}(t)\rangle \d
t\geq 0.
\end{align}
Dividing the inequality in (\ref{eqn56}) by $\lambda$, using the
hemicontinuity property of the operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ (see Lemma \ref{lem2.8}), and then passing $\lambda\to 0$, we get 
\begin{align}\label{eqn60}
\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{G}_0(t),\mathbf{w}(t)\rangle \d
t\geq 0,
\end{align}
for any
$\mathbf{w}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0, T ; \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}).$
It should be noted that the term
${\int_0^{T}}e^{-2\eta t} \eta\lambda\langle\mathbf{w}(t),\mathbf{w}(t)\rangle \d
t$ in \eqref{eqn56} tends to $0$ as $\lambda\to0$.
Finally,  from (\ref{eqn60}), we deduce that  $\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}(t))=\mathrm{G}_0(t)$. Moreover, $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ satisfies 
\begin{align}\label{energy3}
\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t+2\beta\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\leq \|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d t.
\end{align}
Hence, we get  $$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0, T ; \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),$$ with $\partial_t\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}})$. 

Since $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})$ and $\partial_t\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}})$, then using Theorem 3, section 5.9.2, \cite{Evans}, we obtain $\mathbf{u}\in \mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})$. 
Thus
$\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is a weak solution of the system (\ref{kvf}) with $\mathbf{u}(0)=\mathbf{u}_0$.

\vskip 0.2cm

\noindent\textbf{Part (2). Uniqueness:} Let $\mathbf{u}_1(\cdot)$ and $\mathbf{u}_2(\cdot)$ be two weak solutions of the system (\ref{kvf}) satisfying \eqref{energy3}. Then $\mathbf{u}_1(\cdot)-\mathbf{u}_2(\cdot)$ satisfies: 	
\begin{align}\label{346}
&\|\mathbf{u}_1(t)-\mathbf{u}_2(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}_1(s)-\mathbf{u}_2(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&=\|\mathbf{u}_1(0)-\mathbf{u}_2(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\int_0^t\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_1(s))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_2(s)),\mathbf{u}_1(s)-\mathbf{u}_2(s)\rangle\d s\nonumber\\&\quad -2\beta\int_0^t\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_1(s))-\mathcal{C}_2(\mathbf{u}_2(s)),\mathbf{u}_1(s)-\mathbf{u}_2(s)\rangle\d s.
\end{align}
Note that $\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_1)-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_2),\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2\rangle=\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2,\mathbf{u}_2),\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2\rangle,$ since $\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_1,\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2),\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2\rangle=0$. 
An estimate similar to \eqref{2.30} yields
\begin{align}\label{347}
&|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2,\mathbf{u}_2),\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2\rangle|\leq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{\beta}{2}\||\mathbf{u}_2|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\eta\|\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
\end{align}
for $r>3$. A calculation similar to \eqref{2.23} gives 
\begin{align}\label{261}
&\beta\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_1)-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_2),\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2\rangle\geq \frac{\beta}{2}\||\mathbf{u}_2|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}(\mathbf{u}_1-\mathbf{u}_2)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align}
Using (\ref{347}) and (\ref{261}) in \eqref{346}, we arrive at 
\begin{align}\label{3.18}
&\|\mathbf{u}_1(t)-\mathbf{u}_2(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}_1(s)-\mathbf{u}_2(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_1(0)-\mathbf{u}_2(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\eta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}_1(s)-\mathbf{u}_2(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s.
\end{align}
Applying Gronwall's inequality in (\ref{3.18}), we get  
\begin{align}\label{269}
\|\mathbf{u}_1(t)-\mathbf{u}_2(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&\leq \|\mathbf{u}_1(0)-\mathbf{u}_2(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2e^{2\eta T},
\end{align}
and hence the uniqueness follows by taking $\mathbf{u}_1(0)=\mathbf{u}_2(0)$ in \eqref{269}.
\end{proof}
Let us now sketch the proof of the existence and uniqueness of weak solution for the system \eqref{kvf} in the critical case $r=3,$ for $2\beta\mu \geq 1$. This means that when both the viscosity of a fluid and the porosity of a porous medium are sufficiently large, then the corresponding flow stays bounded and regular. 

\begin{theorem}\label{main1}
	Let $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}')$  be given.  Then, for $2\beta\mu \geq 1$, there exists a unique weak solution to the system (\ref{kvf}) satisfying $$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{4}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}).$$ 
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
One can follow in a similar way as in the proof of Theorem \ref{main}. In the critical case $r=3$, note that the operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ is monotone (see \eqref{218}), and hence we provide a short proof in this case. Using the convergences given in \eqref{3.20}, we take limit supremum in \eqref{422} to find 
\begin{align}\label{263}
&\limsup_{n\to\infty}\int_0^t(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(s)),\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d s\nonumber\\&=\limsup_{n\to\infty}\left\{\frac{1}{2}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+\int_0^t(\mathbf{f}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d s\right\}\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{2}\left[\limsup_{n\to\infty}\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\liminf_{n\to\infty}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+\limsup_{n\to\infty}\int_0^t(\mathbf{f}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{1}{2}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+\int_0^t\langle\mathbf{f}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s=\int_0^t\langle \mathrm{G}_0(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle \d
s,
\end{align}
for all $t\in(0,T]$, where we used \eqref{eqn44}, the weak lower-semicontinuity property of the $\mathbb{H}$-norm, and strong convergence of the initial data and forcing. Since $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ is a monotone  operator, from \eqref{218}, we also have 
\begin{align*}
\int_0^t\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(s))-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(s)),\mathbf{u}^n(s)-\mathbf{v}(s)\rangle\d s\geq 0. 
\end{align*}
Taking limit supremum on both sides and using \eqref{263}, we further find 
\begin{align}
\int_0^t\langle \mathrm{G}_0(s)-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(s)),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{v}(s)\rangle \d
s\geq 0. 
\end{align}
Taking $\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}=\lambda\mathbf{w}$, for $\lambda>0$, dividing by $\lambda$, passing $\lambda\to 0$, and then exploiting the hemicontinuity property of the operator $\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$, we finally obtain $\mathrm{G}_0(t)=\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}(t))$. Uniqueness follows by taking the estimate \eqref{232} instead of \eqref{347} and following similarly as in the Part (2) of Theorem \ref{main}. 
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
	1. For $n=2$ and $r=3$, one can prove the Theorem \ref{main1} for any $\beta,\mu >0$, by exploiting the local monotonicity property (see \eqref{fe2}) and a localized version of the Minty-Browder technique (see \cite{BMS,MTM}, etc for more details). 
	
2.	Note that in the Theorems \ref{main} and \ref{main1} compactness arguments are not used  and hence the results obtained in both Theorems are valid in  unbounded domains including Poincar\'e domains and the whole space $\mathbb{R}^n$ (one has to appropriately modify  the functions spaces). 
\end{remark}

\iffalse 
	\begin{remark}
1.	For $2\leq r< 3$ along with $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')\cap\mathrm{L}^{4}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}),$  the results of the Theorem 
	\ref{main} hold true with 
	$$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+3}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+3}),$$ and 
		\begin{align}\label{energy4}
	&\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}}^{4}+6\mu \int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+4\beta \int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+3}}^{r+3}\d t\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}}^{4}+\frac{8}{\mu ^3\uplambda_1^3}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4}}^{4}\d t.
	\end{align} 
	Let us now discuss the major differences in the proof of the Theorem \ref{main} for $2\leq r<3$. One has to use energy estimate given in the Proposition \ref{prop45}, which provides two more convergences in \eqref{3.20}, namely 
	\begin{align}
	\mathbf{u}^n&\xrightarrow{w^*}\mathbf{u}\ \text{ in }\ \mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4),\\
		\mathbf{u}^n&\xrightarrow{w}\mathbf{u}\ \text{ in }\ \mathrm{L}^{r+3}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+3}).
	\end{align}
	One has to define $\eta t$ given in \eqref{eqn47} as $	\eta t:= 2\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7\int_0^t\|\mathbf{v}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^8\d s,$ and use the local monotonicity result \eqref{233} given in the Remark \ref{rem2.7} in place of \eqref{eqn48}. The function $\eta t$ can be controlled as
	\begin{align*}
		\eta t\leq 2\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^4\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^4\d t.
	\end{align*}
	In the uniqueness part, one has to replace \eqref{347} with \eqref{2.28} and the inequality \eqref{269} becomes 
	\begin{align}\label{2.69}
	\|\mathbf{u}_1(t)-\mathbf{u}_2(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&\leq \|\mathbf{u}_1(0)-\mathbf{u}_2(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\exp\left(4\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}_2(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^4\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}_2(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^4\d t\right),
	\end{align}
	and hence the uniqueness follows. 
	
	2. 	For $3\leq r< 5$, if we take $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')\cap\mathrm{L}^{7-r}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r}),$  then one can prove in a similar way as in the Theorem 
	\ref{main} that 
	$$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{7-r})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{6}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{6}).$$
\end{remark}
\fi 

For regularity of the weak solution, due to technical difficulties, we consider the problem in periodic domains or on the whole space $\mathbb{R}^n$. The major difficulty in working with bounded domains is that $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u})$ need not be zero on the boundary, and $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}$ and $-\Delta$ are not commuting. In periodic domain or in whole space $\mathbb{R}^n,$ the operators $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}$ and $-\Delta$ commutes. The following result is available in the literature (for instance, see \cite{KWH}) and for the sake of completeness, we provide a proof in the case of periodic domains.  
\begin{theorem}[Regualrity]
Let $\mathcal{O}$ be a periodic domain.	For $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{V}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})$, any weak solution $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to the system \eqref{kvf} with $r>2$ satisfies the following regularity: $$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A})),$$ and hence $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is a \emph{strong solution} to the system \eqref{kvf}. 

For $r=3$, $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is a \emph{strong solution} to the system \eqref{kvf} with $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A})),$ provided $2\beta\mu \geq 1$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
		Taking inner product with $\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to the first equation in \eqref{kvf}, we find 
	\begin{align}\label{273}
	\frac{1}{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=-(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t)),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t))-\beta(\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t)),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t))-(\mathbf{f}(t),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)).
	\end{align}
	We estimate the first term in the right hand side of the equality \eqref{273} using H\"older's, and Young's inequalities as 
	\begin{align}\label{275}
	|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|&\leq\||\mathbf{u}||\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{\mu }{4}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu }\||\mathbf{u}||\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2. 
	\end{align}
	For $r>3$, we  estimate the final term from \eqref{275} using H\"older's and Young's inequalities as 
	\begin{align*}
&	\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\nonumber\\&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^{\frac{4}{r-1}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^{\frac{2(r-3)}{r-1}}\d x\nonumber\\&\leq\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\right)^{\frac{2}{r-1}}\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\right)^{\frac{r-3}{r-1}}\nonumber\\&\leq{\beta\mu }\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\right)+\frac{r-3}{r-1}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{r-3}}\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\right).
	\end{align*}
	Using Cauchy-Schwarz and Young's inequalities, we estimate $|(\mathbf{f},\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|$ as 
	\begin{align}\label{276}
	|(\mathbf{f},\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|\leq\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{\mu }{4}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
	\end{align}
	Substituting \eqref{275}, \eqref{219} and \eqref{276} in \eqref{273}, and then integrating from $0$ to $t$, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{277}
	&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^t\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\beta\int_0^t\||\mathbf{u}(s)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\frac{2(r-3)}{\mu (r-1)}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{r-3}}\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s,
	\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$. An application of Gronwall's inequality gives 
		\begin{align}\label{2pp77}
	&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\leq\left\{\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right\}\exp\left\{\frac{2(r-3)}{\mu (r-1)}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{r-3}}T\right\},
	\end{align}
for all $t\in[0,T]$. Thus,	it is immediate that  
		\begin{align}\label{2p77}
	&\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+\beta\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq \left\{\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right\}\exp\left\{\frac{4(r-3)}{\mu (r-1)}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{r-3}}T\right\}.
	\end{align}
	
	\iffalse 
	For $r\geq 6$, one can easily obtain from the above estimate that 
	\begin{align}\label{2.77}
	&\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+2\beta(r-1)\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\quad+T^{\frac{r-6}{r-2}}\frac{2C(r-2)}{4(r+1)}\left(\frac{3(r+2)}{\mu (r+1)}\right)^{\frac{3(r+2)}{r-2}}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{4}{r-2}}\nonumber\\&\leq C(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}},T,\mu ,\beta,\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})}).
	\end{align}
	For $r\geq 5$ (in fact by taking $r=5$ in \eqref{275}), the inequality \eqref{277} can be rewritten as 
	\begin{align}\label{2.88}
	&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^t\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+2\beta(r-1)\int_0^t\||\mathbf{u}(s)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\frac{C}{4}\left(\frac{7}{2\mu }\right)^7\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{6}}^{6}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s.
	\end{align}
	An application of Gronwall's inequality in \eqref{2.88} yields 
	\begin{align}\label{2.89}
	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\leq\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right)\exp\left\{\frac{C}{4}\left(\frac{7}{2\mu }\right)^7\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^6}^6\d t\right\},
	\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$. Thus, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{2.90}
	&\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+\frac{8\uplambda_1\beta(r-1)}{r^2}\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right)\exp\left\{\frac{C}{2}\left(\frac{7}{2\mu }\right)^7\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^6}^6\d t\right\}\nonumber\\&\leq C(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}},T,\mu ,\beta,\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})}),
	\end{align}
	where we used \eqref{2p6}.	
	\fi 
	
	For $r=3$, we estimate $|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|$ as 
	\begin{align}\label{291}
	|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|&\leq\|(\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{1}{4\theta}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\theta\||\mathbf{u}||\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
	\end{align}
 A calculation similar to \eqref{277} gives 
	\begin{align}\label{292}
		&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\left(\mu -\frac{1}{2\theta}\right)\int_0^t\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+2\left(\beta-\theta\right)\int_0^t\||\mathbf{u}(s)||\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s.
	\end{align} 
	For $2\beta\mu \geq 1$,  it is immediate that 
	\begin{align}\label{2.94}
	&\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\left(\mu -\frac{1}{2\theta}\right)\int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+\left(\beta-\theta\right)\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)||\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq \left\{\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right\}.
	\end{align}
	
	
	

	Taking inner product with $\partial_t\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to the first equation in \eqref{kvf} to obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{295}
	\|\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{\mu }{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t)),\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t))+\beta(\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t)),\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t))=(\mathbf{f}(t),\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t)).
	\end{align}
	It can be easily seen that 
	\begin{align*}
	(\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t)),\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t))=(\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(|\mathbf{u}(t)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}(t)),\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t))=\frac{1}{r+1}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}. 
	\end{align*}
	We estimate the terms $|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\partial_t\mathbf{u})|$ and $|(\mathbf{f},\partial_t\mathbf{u})|$ using H\"older's and Young's inequalities as
	\begin{align*}
	|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\partial_t\mathbf{u})|&\leq\|(\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\partial_t\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{1}{4}\|\partial_t\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\||\mathbf{u}||\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2, \\
	|(\mathbf{f},\partial_t\mathbf{u})|&\leq\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\partial_t\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{1}{4}\|\partial_t\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2. 
	\end{align*}
	From \eqref{295}, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{296}
&	\frac{1}{2}\|\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{r+1}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}+\frac{\mu }{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\leq\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\||\mathbf{u}||\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
	\end{align}
	Integrating the above inequality from $0$ to $t$, we further have 
	\begin{align}\label{297}
&\frac{1}{r+1}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}+\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t\|\partial_t\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{r+1}\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}+\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\int_0^t\||\mathbf{u}(s)||\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s,
	\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$. Note the final term on the right hand side of \eqref{297} is bounded for all $r\geq 3$ (see \eqref{2.90} and \eqref{2.94}).





Let us now consider 
\begin{align}
&\int_0^T\|\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq 4\mu ^2\int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+4\int_0^T\|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+4\beta^2\int_0^T\|\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+4\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq 4\mu ^2\int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+4\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{1/2}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{3/2}\d t\nonumber\\&\quad+4\beta^2\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{\frac{6(r-1)}{(r+7)}}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2(r+3)(r+1)}{(r+7)}}\d t+4\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t,
\end{align}
and hence $\partial_t\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})$. 

\end{proof}
	
	Note that \begin{align}\label{280}x^2\leq 1+x^{r-1},\ \text{ for all }\ x\geq 0\ \text{  and }\  r\geq 3.\end{align} Using this and the energy estimates \eqref{energy3} and \eqref{energy4}, we estimate $\||\mathbf{u}||\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})}^2$ as 
	\begin{align}\label{278}
	&	\int_0^T\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x,t)|^2|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x,t)|^2\d x\d t\nonumber\\&\leq \int_0^T\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x,t)|^2\d x\d t+\int_0^T\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x,t)|^{r-1}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x,t)|^2\d x\d t\\&\leq \frac{1}{\mu }\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right)\nonumber\\&\quad+\frac{2}{\mu  r(r+1)}\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}+\frac{(r+1)^{r+1}}{(2\mu \uplambda_1)^{r+1}}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right). \nonumber
	\end{align}
	Substituting \eqref{278} in \eqref{277}, we arrive at 
	\begin{align}
	&\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+2\beta(r-1)\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+\frac{2}{\mu ^2}\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right)\nonumber\\&\quad+\frac{4}{\mu ^2 r(r+1)}\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}+\frac{(r+1)^{r+1}}{(2\mu \uplambda_1)^{r+1}}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right). 
	\end{align}
	Hence, we get $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}))$.
	
	
		Let us define $\mathbf{v}(\cdot)=\partial_t\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$. Then differentiating \eqref{kvf} with respect to $t$, we find 
	\begin{align}
	\partial_t\mathbf{v}(t)=-\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}(t),\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v}(t))-\beta r\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}(\mathbf{u}(t))\mathbf{v}(t)+\mathbf{f}_t(t),
	\end{align}
	where $\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}(\mathbf{u})\mathbf{v}=\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{v}$ and $\mathbf{v}(0)=-\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}_0-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_0)-\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_0)+\mathbf{f}(0)$. Taking inner product with $\mathbf{v}(\cdot)$, we get 
	\begin{align}\label{2.96}
	\frac{1}{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \|\nabla\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\beta r(\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}(\mathbf{u}(t))\mathbf{v}(t),\mathbf{v}(t))&=-(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}(t),\mathbf{u}(t)),\mathbf{v}(t))+(\mathbf{f}_t(t),\mathbf{v}(t))
	\end{align}
	Note that $(\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}(\mathbf{u})\mathbf{v},\mathbf{v})\geq\||\mathbf{u}|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\mathbf{v}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\geq 0$. A calculation similar to \eqref{bes} gives 
	\begin{align}
	|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v})|\leq \frac{\mu }{4}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{C(r-2)}{2(r+1)}\left(\frac{2(r+4)}{\mu (r+1)}\right)^{\frac{r+4}{r-2}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-2}}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
	\end{align}
for $r\geq 4$.	 Using H\"older's and Young's inequalities, we estimate  $|(\mathbf{f}_t,\mathbf{v})|$ as 
	\begin{align}
	|(\mathbf{f}_t,\mathbf{v})|&\leq\|\mathbf{f}_t\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\leq\frac{1}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}_t\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2+\frac{\mu }{4}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2.
	\end{align}
	Thus from \eqref{2.96}, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{299}
&	\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{v}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{v}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}_t(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d s+\frac{C(r-2)}{(r+1)}\left(\frac{2(r+4)}{\mu (r+1)}\right)^{\frac{r+4}{r-2}}\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-2}}\|\mathbf{v}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s.
	\end{align}
	An application of Gronwall's inequality in \eqref{299} yields 
	\begin{align}
	\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq\left\{\|\mathbf{v}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}_t(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d t\right\}\exp\left\{\frac{C(r-2)}{(r+1)}\left(\frac{2(r+4)}{\mu (r+1)}\right)^{\frac{r+4}{r-2}}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-2}}\d t\right\},
	\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$. Thus, from \eqref{299}, it is immediate that 
	\begin{align}
&	\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq \left\{\|\mathbf{v}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}_t(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d t\right\}\exp\left\{\frac{CT^{\frac{r-2}{r-4}}(r-2)}{(r+1)}\left(\frac{2(r+4)}{\mu (r+1)}\right)^{\frac{r-4}{r-2}}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{2}{r-2}}\right\}.
	\end{align}
	
	For $r=3$, we estimate $|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v})|$ as 
	\begin{align}
	|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v},\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v})|\leq\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\||\mathbf{v}||\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{\mu }{4}\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\||\mathbf{u}||\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2. 
	\end{align}
	Thus, for $\beta\mu \geq 1$, from \eqref{2.96}, we obtain 
	\begin{align}
	&	\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{v}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\left(\beta-\frac{1}{\mu }\right)\int_0^t\||\mathbf{u}(s)||\mathbf{v}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq \|\mathbf{v}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}_t(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d s,
	\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$. 
	
	
	\fi 
	
\iffalse 
\begin{remark}\label{rem2.12}
1.	If we take $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})$, then one can obtain the following regularity of the weak solution to the problem \eqref{kvf}. In this case, $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is the unique strong solution to the system \eqref{kvf}. 
	
	
		2. Let us now discuss about the inviscid limit as $\beta\to 0$ in \eqref{kvf}. We know that there exists a weak solution $\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})$ to the 3D Navier-Stokes system:
	\begin{equation}\label{285}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\frac{\d\mathbf{v}(t)}{\d t}+\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{v}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}(t))&=\mathbf{f}(t),\\
	\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H},
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
	for $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')$. Let us take $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$ and  $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})$. Then, a weak solution $\mathbf{v}(\cdot)$ to the $3D$ Navier-Stokes equation satisfies $\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})$. Let us define $\mathbf{w}=\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}$. Then $\mathbf{w}$ satisfies 
	\begin{equation}\label{286}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\frac{\d\mathbf{w}(t)}{\d t}+\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{w}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}(t))&=-\beta\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(|\mathbf{u}(t)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}(t)),\\
	\mathbf{w}(0)&=\mathbf{0}.
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
	Taking inner product with $\mathbf{w}(\cdot)$ in \eqref{286}, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{287}
	\frac{1}{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \|\nabla\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{w}(t)\rangle-\beta\langle|\mathbf{u}(t)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{w}(t)\rangle. 
	\end{align}
	A calculation similar to the estimate \eqref{bes} implies 
	\begin{align}\label{288}
	|\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}),\mathbf{w}\rangle|&\leq  \frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+2\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^8\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
	\end{align}
	The final term from the equality \eqref{287} can be estimated using H\"older's and Young's inequalities as 
	\begin{align}\label{289}
	\beta|\langle|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u},\mathbf{w}\rangle|\leq\beta\||\mathbf{u}|^r\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{\beta}{2}\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{\beta}{2}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{2r}}^{2r}. 
	\end{align}
	Using \eqref{288} and \eqref{289} in \eqref{287} and then integrating from $0$ to $t$, we arrive at 
	\begin{align}\label{290}
	&\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^t\|\nabla\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq 4\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^8\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{2r}}^{2r}\d s.
	\end{align}
	Applying Gronwall's inequality in \eqref{290}, we find 
	\begin{align}
	\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq \beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{2r}}^{2r}\d se^{\beta t}\exp\left\{4\left(\frac{7}{4\mu }\right)^7\sup_{s\in[0,t]}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^4\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^4\d s\right\},
	\end{align}
	an hence the weak solution to $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to the system \eqref{kvf} (see \eqref{energy3} and \eqref{energy4}) converges to a weak solution to the 3D Navier-Stokes system \eqref{286} as $\beta\to 0$. 
\end{remark}

\begin{remark}\label{rem2.13}
1. 	For $n=2$ and $r\in[2,\infty)$, 	from the estimate \eqref{2.8}, we have 
	\begin{align}
	\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{2r}}\leq C\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{1-\frac{1}{r}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{1}{r}}\leq C\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}},
	\end{align}
	for all $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{2r}$. Thus, a function  $$\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),$$ for $r\geq 2$ with $\partial_t\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}'),$  is called a \emph{weak solution} to the system (\ref{kvf}), if for $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}')$, $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}$, $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ satisfies:
	\begin{equation}\label{272}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\langle\partial_t\mathbf{u}(t)+\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t)),\mathbf{v}\rangle&=\langle\mathbf{f}(t),\mathbf{v}\rangle,\\
	\lim_{t\downarrow 0}\int_{\mathcal{O}}\mathbf{u}(t)\mathbf{v}\d x&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}\mathbf{u}_0\mathbf{v}\d x,
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
	and the energy equality:
	\begin{align}
	\frac{1}{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}+\mu \|\mathbf{u}(t)\|^2_{\mathbb{V}}+\beta\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}=\langle \mathbf{f}(t),\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle.
	\end{align}
	
	The existence and uniqueness of a weak solution for the system \eqref{kvf} in the two dimensional case can be proved in a similar way as in Theorem \ref{main} by exploiting the local monotonicity result obtained in \eqref{fes2}. In the proof of Theorem \ref{main}, one has to take $\eta t$ in \eqref{eqn47} as $\eta t=\frac{27}{32\mu ^3}\int_0^t\|\mathbf{v}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}^4\d s$ and the estimate \eqref{347} has to be replaced with an estimate similar to \eqref{221}. 
	
	2. For the case $n=2$, for $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{V}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{H})$, one can obtain the strong solution to the system \eqref{kvf} in a similar way as in Remark \ref{rem2.12}. One needs to replace the estimate \eqref{275} by 
	\begin{align}
	|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|&\leq\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^4}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq 2^{1/2}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{1/2}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{3/2}\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{\mu }{4}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{27}{4\mu ^3}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^4,
	\end{align}
	where we used H\"older's, Ladyzhenskaya and Young's inequalities. A calculation similar  to \eqref{277} yields 
		\begin{align}\label{281}
	&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^t\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+2\beta(r-1)\int_0^t\||\mathbf{u}(s)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\frac{27}{2\mu ^3}\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^4\d s.
	\end{align}
	An application of Gronwall's inequality in \eqref{281} gives 
	\begin{align}\label{282}
		&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^t\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+2\beta(r-1)\int_0^t\||\mathbf{u}(s)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right)\exp\left(\frac{27}{2\mu ^3}\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right).
	\end{align}
	Using the energy estimate \eqref{energy3}, we get 
	\begin{align}
	\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t&\leq\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq \left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d t\right)^2. 
	\end{align}
	Thus, from \eqref{282}, we finally arrive at 
	\begin{align}
	&\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+2\beta(r-1)\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\leq\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\int_0^t\|\mathbf{f}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right)\exp\left\{\frac{27}{2\mu ^3}\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right)^2\right\},
	\end{align}
	and hence we obtain $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A}))$. 
\end{remark}


\begin{remark}
	Let us now show the existence of a global attractor for the Navier-Stokes-Brinkman-Forchheimer  equations in two dimensional bounded domains. Here we assume that the external forcing $\mathbf{f}$ appearing in \eqref{kvf} is independent of $t$. We know that there exists a unique weak solution for the system \eqref{kvf} and the solution can be represented through a one parameter family of continuous semigroup. Using the Remark \ref{rem2.13},  we can define a continuous semigroup $\{\mathrm{S}(t)\}_{t\geq 0}$ in $\mathbb{H}$ by 
	\begin{align}
	\mathrm{S}(t)\mathbf{u}_0= \mathbf{u}(t), \ t\geq 0,
	\end{align}
	where $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is the unique weak solution of the system \eqref{kvf} with $\mathbf{f}(t)=\mathbf{f}\in\mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbf{u}(0)=\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}$. 
	 Taking inner product with $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to the first equation in \eqref{kvf} to find 
	\begin{align}\label{293}
	\frac{1}{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\beta\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}&=(\mathbf{f},\mathbf{u}(t))\leq\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{1}{2\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2. 
	\end{align}
	Thus, using Poincar\'e inequality in \eqref{293}, we further have 
	\begin{align}\label{294}
	\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \uplambda_1\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\beta\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\leq\frac{1}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2. 
	\end{align}
	Applying Gronwall's inequality  in \eqref{294}, we get 
	\begin{align}
	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}\leq e^{-\mu \uplambda_1t}\|\mathbf{u}_0\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}+\frac{1}{\mu ^2\uplambda_1^2}\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
	\end{align}
	Taking limit as $t\to\infty$, we find 
	\begin{align}\label{est}
	\limsup_{t\to\infty}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq \frac{1}{\mu ^2\uplambda_1^2}\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
	\end{align}
The inequality \eqref{est} implies that the semigroup $\mathrm{S}(t):\mathbb{H}\to\mathbb{H}$, $t\geq 0$ associated with the weak solution to the problem \eqref{kvf} has an absorbing ball 
	\begin{align}\label{3.1}
	\mathcal{B}_1:=\left\{\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{H}:\|\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq M_1\equiv \frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\right\}.
	\end{align}
That is, given a bounded set $\mathrm{B}\subset\mathbb{H}$, there exists an entering time $t_\mathrm{B}>0$ such that $\mathrm{S}(t)\mathrm{B}\subset\mathcal{B}_1$, for all $t\geq t_\mathrm{B}$. 
	Hence, the following uniform estimate is valid:
	\begin{align}\label{3.8}
	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq M_1, \ \text{ where }\ M_1= \frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}},
	\end{align}
	for $t$ large enough ($t\gg 1$) depending on the initial data. 	Integrating the inequality \eqref{294} from $t$ to $t+\tau$, for $\tau>0$, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{316}
	\mu \int_t^{t+\tau}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_t^{t+\tau}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s&\leq \|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{\tau}{\mu \uplambda_1}\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}\left(\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}+\tau\right)\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
	\end{align}
for $t\geq t_{\mathrm{B}}$. 	Moreover, we have 
\begin{align}
\limsup\limits_{T\to\infty}\int_0^{T}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\leq\frac{\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2}{\mu ^2\uplambda_1},
\end{align}
and 
\begin{align}
\limsup\limits_{T\to\infty}\int_0^{T}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\leq\frac{\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2}{2\mu \beta\uplambda_1}.
\end{align}

Taking inner product with $\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to the first equation in \eqref{kvf}, we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{206} 
&\frac{1}{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\beta(r-1)\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2=(\mathbf{f},\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t))-(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t)),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)).
\end{align}
In order to obtain an absorbing ball in $\mathbb{V}$, for $r\geq 5$, we avoid the uniform Gronwall's Lemma used  for the 2D Navier-Stokes equations in \cite{Te2}.  In this case, we make use of the double integration trick used in \cite{JCR1}. We use Cauchy-Schwarz, H\"older's, Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Young's inequalities to estimate $(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})$ as 
\begin{align}\label{207}
|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|&\leq \|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq \|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\nonumber\\&\leq C\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r+3}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{\frac{r+7}{r+3}}\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{\mu }{4}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+C\left(\frac{r-1}{2(r+3)}\right)\left(\frac{2(r+7)}{\mu (r+3)}\right)^{\frac{r+7}{r-1}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{4(r+1)}{r-1}}.
\end{align}
Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and Young's inequality, we estimate $|(\mathbf{f},\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|$ as 
\begin{align}\label{208}
|(\mathbf{f},\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|&\leq\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{\mu }{4}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align}
Combining \eqref{207} and \eqref{208} and then substituting it in \eqref{206}, we get 
\begin{align}\label{209} 
&\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\beta(r-1)\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{2}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+C\left(\frac{r-1}{r+3}\right)\left(\frac{2(r+7)}{\mu (r+3)}\right)^{\frac{r+7}{r-1}}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{4(r+1)}{r-1}}.
\end{align}
Dropping the terms $\frac{\mu }{\uplambda_1}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+2\beta(r-1)\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$  from \eqref{209} and then integrating between $s$ and $t+1$, with $t\leq s<t+1$, we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{210}
\|\mathbf{u}(t+1)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2&\leq\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+C\left(\frac{r-1}{r+3}\right)\left(\frac{2(r+7)}{\mu (r+3)}\right)^{\frac{r+7}{r-1}}\int_s^{t+1}\|\mathbf{u}(k)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{\frac{4(r+1)}{r-1}}\d k\nonumber\\&\leq \|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+C\left(\frac{r-1}{r+3}\right)\left(\frac{2(r+7)}{\mu (r+3)}\right)^{\frac{r+7}{r-1}}\left(\int_t^{t+1}\|\mathbf{u}(k)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d k\right)^{\frac{4}{r-1}}\nonumber\\&\leq \|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+C\left(\frac{r-1}{r+3}\right)\left(\frac{2(r+7)}{\mu (r+3)}\right)^{\frac{r+7}{r-1}}\left(\frac{1}{2\beta\mu \uplambda_1}\left(\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}+1\right)\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)^{\frac{4}{r-1}},
\end{align}
for $r\geq 5$, where we used \eqref{316} for $t\geq t_{\mathrm{B}}$. Integrating $s$ between $t$ and $t+1$ in \eqref{210} and then using  \eqref{316}, we find 
\begin{align}
&\|\mathbf{u}(t+1)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\nonumber\\&\leq \int_{t}^{t+1}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+\frac{2}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+C\left(\frac{r-1}{r+3}\right)\left(\frac{2(r+7)}{\mu (r+3)}\right)^{\frac{r+7}{r-1}}\left(\frac{1}{2\beta\mu \uplambda_1}\left(\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}+1\right)\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)^{\frac{4}{r-1}}\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{\mu ^2\uplambda_1}\left(\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}+1\right)\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{2}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+C\left(\frac{r-1}{r+3}\right)\left(\frac{2(r+7)}{\mu (r+3)}\right)^{\frac{r+7}{r-1}}\left(\frac{1}{2\beta\mu \uplambda_1}\left(\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}+1\right)\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)^{\frac{4}{r-1}}, 
\end{align}
for $t\geq t_{\mathrm{B}}$. Let us now integrate \eqref{209} from $t$ to $t+\tau$ to obtain 
\begin{align}
&\|\mathbf{u}(t+\tau)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_t^{t+\tau}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+2\beta(r-1)\int_t^{t+\tau}\||\mathbf{u}(s)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(s)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+ \frac{2\tau}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+C\tau^{\frac{r-5}{r-1}}\left(\frac{r-1}{r+3}\right)\left(\frac{2(r+7)}{\mu (r+3)}\right)^{\frac{r+7}{r-1}}\left(\int_t^{t+\tau}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\right)^{\frac{4}{r-1}}\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{\mu ^2\uplambda_1}\left(\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}+1\right)\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{2(1+\tau)}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\nonumber\\&\quad+C\left(1+\tau^{\frac{r-5}{r-1}}\right)\left(\frac{r-1}{r+3}\right)\left(\frac{2(r+7)}{\mu (r+3)}\right)^{\frac{r+7}{r-1}}\left(\frac{1}{2\beta\mu \uplambda_1}\left(\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}+\tau\right)\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)^{\frac{4}{r-1}},
\end{align}
for all $t\geq t_{\mathrm{B}}+1$. 

For $r\in[2,5]$ (in fact for all $r\in[2,\infty)$), one can use the uniform Gronwall's lemma (Lemma III. 1.1, \cite{Te2}) to obtain the absorbing ball in $\mathbb{V}$. For this, the estimate \eqref{207} needs to be replaced by 
\begin{align}
|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|&\leq \|\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u})\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq C\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\infty}}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\nonumber\\&\leq C\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{1/2}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|^{3/2}\leq\frac{\mu }{4}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{27 C}{4\mu ^3}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^4,
\end{align}
where we used Agmon's inequality. Thus, the estimate \eqref{209} becomes 
\begin{align}\label{216} 
&\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \uplambda_1\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\leq \frac{2}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{27 C}{2\mu ^3}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^4.
\end{align}
where we used the fact that $\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\leq \frac{1}{\uplambda_1}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$, for all $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A})$. Applying uniform Gronwall's lemma in \eqref{216}, we further have 
\begin{align}\label{217}
\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\leq \left(\frac{a_3}{\tau}+a_2\right)e^{a_1}, \ \text{ for }\ t\geq t_{\mathrm{B}}+\tau, 
\end{align}
where 
\begin{align*}
a_1=\frac{27 CM_1^2}{2\mu ^3}a_3, \ a_2=\frac{2\tau}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2, \ a_3=  \frac{1}{\mu ^2\uplambda_1}\left(\frac{1}{\mu \uplambda_1}+\tau\right)\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align*}
Let us fix  $\tau>0$ and denote the right hand side of \eqref{217} as $M_2$. Then, we can conclude that there exists an absorbing ball $\mathcal{B}_2$ of $\mathbb{V}$ for the semigroup $\mathrm{S}(t)$.  Moreover, if $\mathcal{B}$ is any bounded subset of $\mathbb{H}$, then $\mathrm{S}(t)\mathcal{B}\subset\mathcal{B}_2$ for $t\geq t_{\mathrm{B}}+r$. This, shows the existence of an absorbing set in $\mathbb{V}$ and also the operators $\mathrm{S}(t)$ are uniformly compact. Thus, the conditions of Theorem I.1.12, \cite{Te2} are satisfied and we have the following theorem: 
\end{remark}

\begin{theorem}
	The dynamical system associated with the 2D Navier-Stokes-Brinkman-Forchheimer  equations \eqref{kvf} possesses an attractor $\mathscr{A}$ that is compact, connected and maximal in $\mathbb{H}$. Moreover, $\mathscr{A}$ attracts the bounded sets of $\mathbb{H}$ and $\mathscr{A}$ is also maximal among the functional invariant sets bounded in $\mathbb{H}$.  
\end{theorem}

\fi


\section{Stochastic  convective Brinkman-Forchheimer  equations}\label{sec4}\setcounter{equation}{0} In this section, we consider the following stochastic  convective Brinkman-Forchheimer  equations perturbed by multiplicative Gaussian noise:
\begin{equation}\label{31}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
\d\mathbf{u}(t)-\mu \Delta\mathbf{u}(t)&+(\mathbf{u}(t)\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u}(t)+\beta|\mathbf{u}(t)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}(t)+\nabla p(t)\\&=\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))\d\mathrm{W}(t), \ \text{ in } \ \mathcal{O}\times(0,T), \\ \nabla\cdot\mathbf{u}(t)&=0, \ \text{ in } \ \mathcal{O}\times(0,T), \\
\mathbf{u}(t)&=\mathbf{0}\ \text{ on } \ \partial\mathcal{O}\times(0,T), \\
\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0 \ \text{ in } \ \mathcal{O},
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation} 
where $\mathrm{W}(\cdot)$ is an $\mathbb{H}$-valued Wiener process.


\subsection{Noise coefficient} Let $(\Omega,\mathscr{F},\mathbb{P})$ be a complete probability space equipped with an increasing family of sub-sigma fields $\{\mathscr{F}_t\}_{0\leq t\leq T}$ of $\mathscr{F}$ satisfying:
\begin{enumerate}
	\item [(i)] $\mathscr{F}_0$ contains all elements $F\in\mathscr{F}$ with $\mathbb{P}(F)=0$,
	\item [(ii)] $\mathscr{F}_t=\mathscr{F}_{t+}=\bigcap\limits_{s>t}\mathscr{F}_s,$ for $0\leq t\leq T$.
\end{enumerate} 
\iffalse 
Let $\mathbb{H}$ be a separable Hilbert space, $\mathbb{X}$ be a Banach space and $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H},\mathbb{X})$ be the space of all bounded linear operators form $\mathbb{H}$ to $\mathbb{X}$. Let $\mathrm{W}(\cdot)$ be an $\mathbb{H}$-valued cylindrical Wiener process. Indeed, for an orthonormal basis
$\{e_j(x)\}_{j=1}^{\infty}$ in $\mathbb{H}$, $\mathrm{W}(\cdot)$ can be
represented as
\begin{align}
\mathrm{W}(t)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\beta_n(t)e_n,
\end{align}
where $\{\beta_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ is a sequence of mutually independent real Brownian motions in a fixed probability space $(\Omega,\mathscr{F},\mathbb{P})$ adapted to a filtration $\{\mathscr{F}_t\}_{t\geq 0}$. A bounded linear operator
$\Phi:\mathbb{H}\to\mathbb{X}$, $p\in[2,\infty)$ is a $\gamma$-radonifying
operator in $\mathbb{X}$ such that
\begin{align}
\Phi \d\mathrm{W}(t)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\Phi e_n(x)\d\beta_n(t).
\end{align}
For a sequence	of independent standard Gaussian random variables	$\{\gamma_j\}_{j=1}^{\infty}$ on a probability space	$(\widetilde{\Omega},\widetilde{\mathscr{F}},\widetilde{\mathbb{P}})$	(we use the notation $(\Omega,\mathscr{F},\mathbb{P})$ for the	probability space on which our process is defined), the operator
$\Phi$ is said to be \emph{$\gamma$-radonifying} if the Gaussian
series ${\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}}\gamma_j\Phi e_j$
converges in $\mathrm{L}^2(\widetilde{\Omega};\mathbb{X})$. The number
\begin{align}
\|\Phi\|_{\gamma(\mathbb{H},\mathbb{X})}:=\left(\widetilde{\mathbb{E}}\left\|\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\gamma_n\Phi
e_n\right\|^2_{\mathbb{X}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}},
\end{align}
independent of the sequence $\{\gamma_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ and the
basis $\{e_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$, defines a norm on the space
$\gamma(\mathbb{H},\mathbb{X})$ of all $\gamma$-radonifying operators from $\mathbb{H}$
into $\mathbb{X}$. For $\mathbb{X}=\mathbb{H}$, $\gamma(\mathbb{H},\mathbb{X})$ is the space of all \emph{Hilbert-Schmidt
	operator} on $\mathbb{H}$ and we denote it by $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}$. For more details on the $\gamma$-radonifying operators, the interested readers are referred to see \cite{N10}. 

Let $\Phi\in\gamma(\mathbb{H},\mathbb{X})$ and $\mathcal{K}\in\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{X},\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{X},\mathbb{R}))=\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{X},\mathbb{X}')$ be given. Then using Lemma 2.3, \cite{ZBJM}, we know that the sum $$\mathrm{Tr}_{\Phi}\mathcal{K}:=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\langle \mathcal{K}\Phi e_n,\Phi e_n\rangle_{\mathbb{X}',\mathbb{X}} $$ converges in $\mathbb{X}$ and does not depend on the choice of the orthornomal basis. Furthermore, we have  
\begin{align}\label{35}
|\mathrm{Tr}_{\Phi}\mathcal{K}|\leq\|\mathcal{K}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{X},\mathbb{X}')}\|\Phi\|_{\gamma(\mathbb{H},\mathbb{X})}^2.
\end{align}
Whenever, $\mathbb{X}=\mathbb{H}$, we use the symbol $\|\Phi\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2=\text{Tr}(\Phi^*\Phi)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\|\Phi e_n\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$. The inner product in $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}$ is given by $(\Phi,\Psi)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(\Phi e_n,\Psi e_n)$. 
Next we state the It\^o formula given in Theorem 2.4, \cite{ZBJM} (see \cite{JMAM} also). A function $f:[0,T]\times\mathbb{X}\to\mathbb{Y}$ is said to be of class $\mathrm{C}^{1,2}$ if  it is differentiable in the first variable and twice Fr\'echet differentiable in the second variable and the functions $f,\mathrm{D}_1f,\mathrm{D}_2f$ and $\mathrm{D}_{2}^2f$ are continuous on $[0,T]\times\mathbb{X}$. Here $\mathrm{D}_1f$ and $\mathrm{D}_2f$ are the derivatives with respect to the first and second variable, respectively. 
\begin{theorem}[It\^o's formula]
	Let $\mathbb{X}$ and $\mathbb{Y}$ be UMD (unconditional martingale difference) Banach spaces. Assume that $f:[0,T]\times\mathbb{X}\to\mathbb{Y}$ is of class $\mathrm{C}^{1,2}$. Let $\Phi:[0,T]\times\Omega\to\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H},\mathbb{X})$ be an $\mathbb{H}$-strongly measurable and adapted process which is stochastically integrable with respect to $\mathrm{W}$ and assume that the paths of $\Phi$ belong to $\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\gamma(\mathbb{H},\mathbb{X})),$ $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. Let $\psi:[0,T]\times\Omega\to\mathbb{X}$ be strongly measurable and adapted with paths in $\mathrm{L}^1(0,T;\mathbb{X})$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. Let $\xi:\Omega\to\mathbb{X}$ be strongly $\mathscr{F}_0$-measurable. Let us define $\zeta:[0,T]\times\Omega\to\mathbb{X}$ by $$\zeta=\xi+\int_0^{\cdot}\psi(s)\d s+\int_0^{\cdot}\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s).$$ Then $s\mapsto D_2f(s,\zeta(s))\Phi(s)$ is stochastically integrable and for all $t\in[0,T]$, we have 
	\begin{align*}
	f(t,\zeta(t))&=f(0,\zeta(0))+\int_0^t\mathrm{D}_1f(s,\zeta(s))\d s+\int_0^t\mathrm{D}_2f(s,\zeta(s))\psi(s)\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^t\mathrm{D}_2f(s,\zeta(s))\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s)+\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t\mathrm{Tr}_{\Phi(s)}\left(\mathrm{D}_2^2f(s,\zeta(s))\right)\d s,
	\end{align*}
	$\mathbb{P}$-a.s.
\end{theorem}
Note that all Hilbert spaces and $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p$ for $1<p<\infty$ are UMD Banach spaces. Moreover, they are $2$-smooth Banach spaces (see \cite{ZB}). Let $\mathbb{H}$ be a Hilbert space and $\mathbb{X}$ be a UMD Banach space. 
\fi 



\begin{definition}
	A stochastic process $\{\mathrm{W}(t)\}_{0\leq
		t\leq T}$ is said to be an \emph{$\mathbb{H}$-valued $\mathscr{F}_t$-adapted
		Wiener process} with covariance operator $\mathrm{Q}$ if
	\begin{enumerate}
		\item [$(i)$] for each non-zero $h\in \mathbb{H}$, $|\mathrm{Q}^{1/2}h|^{-1} (\mathrm{W}(t), h)$ is a standard one dimensional Wiener process,
		\item [$(ii)$] for any $h\in \mathbb{H}, (\mathrm{W}(t), h)$ is a martingale adapted to $\mathscr{F}_t$.
	\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}
The stochastic process $\{\mathrm{W}(t) : 0\leq t\leq T\}$ is a $\mathbb{H}$-valued Wiener process with covariance $\mathrm{Q}$ if and only if for arbitrary $t$, the process $\mathrm{W}(t)$ can be expressed as $\mathrm{W}(t,x) =\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sqrt{\mu_k}e_k(x)\upbeta_k(t)$, where  $\upbeta_{k}(t),k\in\mathbb{N}$ are independent one dimensional Brownian motions on $(\Omega,\mathscr{F},\mathbb{P})$ and $\{e_k \}_{k=1}^{\infty}$ are the orthonormal basis functions of $\mathbb{H}$ such that $\mathrm{Q} e_k=\mu_k e_k$.  If $\mathrm{W}(\cdot)$ is an $\mathbb{H}$-valued Wiener process with covariance operator $\mathrm{Q}$ with $\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}} \mathrm{Q}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \mu_k< +\infty$, then $\mathrm{W}(\cdot)$ is a Gaussian process on $\mathbb{H}$ and $ \mathbb{E}[\mathrm{W}(t)] = 0,$ $\textrm{Cov} [\mathrm{W}(t)] = t\mathrm{Q},$ $t\geq 0.$ The space $\mathbb{H}_0=\mathrm{Q}^{1/2}\mathbb{H}$ is a Hilbert space equipped with the inner product $(\cdot, \cdot)_0$, $$(\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v})_0 =\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\lambda_k}(\mathbf{u},e_k)(\mathbf{v},e_k)= (\mathrm{Q}^{-1/2}\mathbf{u}, \mathrm{Q}^{-1/2}\mathbf{v}),\ \text{ for all } \ \mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}\in \mathbb{H}_0,$$ where $\mathrm{Q}^{-1/2}$ is the pseudo-inverse of $\mathrm{Q}^{1/2}$. 




Let $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H})$ denotes the space of all bounded linear operators on $\mathbb{H}$ and $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}:=\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}(\mathbb{H})$ denotes the space of all Hilbert-Schmidt operators from $\mathbb{H}_0:=\mathrm{Q}^{1/2}\mathbb{H}$ to $\mathbb{H}$.  Since $\mathrm{Q}$ is a trace class operator, the embedding of $\mathbb{H}_0$ in $\mathbb{H}$ is Hilbert-Schmidt and the space $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}$ is a Hilbert space equipped with the norm $ \left\|\Phi\right\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}=\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}\left(\Phi {\mathrm{Q}}\Phi^*\right)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\| {\mathrm{Q}}^{1/2}\Phi^*e_k\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2 $ and inner product $ \left(\Phi,\Psi\right)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}=\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}\left(\Phi {\mathrm{Q}}\Psi^*\right)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left({\mathrm{Q}}^{1/2}\Psi^*e_k,{\mathrm{Q}}^{1/2}\Phi^*e_k\right) $. For more details, the interested readers are referred to see \cite{DaZ}.






\begin{hypothesis}\label{hyp}
	The noise coefficient $\Phi(\cdot,\cdot)$ satisfies: 
	\begin{itemize}
		\item [(H.1)] The function $\Phi\in\mathrm{C}([0,T]\times\mathbb{V};\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}(\mathbb{H}))$.
		\item[(H.2)]  (Growth condition)
		There exists a positive
		constant $K$ such that for all $t\in[0,T]$ and $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{H}$,
		\begin{equation*}
		\|\Phi(t, \mathbf{u})\|^{2}_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}} 	\leq K\left(1 +\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2}\right),
		\end{equation*}
		
		\item[(H.3)]  (Lipschitz condition)
		There exists a positive constant $L$ such that for any $t\in[0,T]$ and all $\mathbf{u}_1,\mathbf{u}_2\in\mathbb{H}$,
		\begin{align*}
		\|\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}_1) - \Phi(t,\mathbf{u}_2)\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\leq L\|\mathbf{u}_1 -	\mathbf{u}_2\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
		\end{align*}
	\end{itemize}
\end{hypothesis}	





\subsection{Abstract formulation of the stochastic system}\label{sec2.4}
On  taking orthogonal projection $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}$ onto the first equation in \eqref{31}, we get 
\begin{equation}\label{32}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
\d\mathbf{u}(t)+[\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))]\d t&=\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))\d\mathrm{W}(t), \ t\in(0,T),\\
\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0,
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
where $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{H})$. Strictly speaking one should write $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}\Phi$ instead of $\Phi$. 









Let us now provide the definition of a unique global strong solution in the probabilistic sense to the system (\ref{32}).
\begin{definition}[Global strong solution]
	Let $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{H})$ be given. An $\mathbb{H}$-valued $(\mathscr{F}_t)_{t\geq 0}$-adapted stochastic process $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is called a \emph{strong solution} to the system (\ref{32}) if the following conditions are satisfied: 
	\begin{enumerate}
		\item [(i)] the process $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}))\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}))$ and $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ has a $\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$-valued  modification, which is progressively measurable with continuous paths in $\mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s.,
		\item [(ii)] the following equality holds for every $t\in [0, T ]$, as an element of $\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}},$ $\mathbb{P}$-a.s.
		\begin{align}\label{4.4}
		\mathbf{u}(t)&=\mathbf{u}_0-\int_0^t\left[\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(s))+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(s))\right]\d s+\int_0^t\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\d \mathrm{W}(s).
		\end{align}
			\item [(iii)] the following It\^o formula holds true: 
				\begin{align}
			&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\nonumber\\&=\|{\mathbf{u}_0}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\int_0^t\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s+2\int_0^t(\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)),
			\end{align}
			for all $t\in(0,T)$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s.
	\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}
An alternative version of condition (\ref{4.4}) is to require that for any  $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$:
\begin{align}\label{4.5}
(\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v})&=(\mathbf{u}_0,\mathbf{v})-\int_0^t\langle\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(s))+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(s)),\mathbf{v}\rangle\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^t\left(\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\d \mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{v}\right),\ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.}
\end{align}	
\begin{definition}
	A strong solution $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to (\ref{32}) is called a
	\emph{pathwise  unique strong solution} if
	$\widetilde{\mathbf{u}}(\cdot)$ is an another strong
	solution, then $$\mathbb{P}\Big\{\omega\in\Omega:\mathbf{u}(t)=\widetilde{\mathbf{u}}(t),\ \text{ for all }\ t\in[0,T]\Big\}=1.$$ 
\end{definition}







\subsection{Energy estimates} In this subsection, we formulate a finite dimensional system and establish some a-priori energy estimates. Let $\{e_1,\ldots,e_n,\ldots\}$ be a complete orthonormal system in $\mathbb{H}$ belonging to $\mathbb{V}$ and let $\mathbb{H}_n$ be the $\mathrm{span}\{e_1,\ldots,e_n\}$. Let $\mathrm{P}_n$ denote the orthogonal projection of $\mathbb{V}'$ to $\mathbb{H}_n$, that is, $\mathrm{P}_n\mathbf{x}=\sum_{i=1}^n\langle \mathbf{x},e_i\rangle e_i$. Since every element $\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{H}$ induces a functional $\mathbf{x}^*\in\mathbb{H}$  by the formula $\langle \mathbf{x}^*,\mathbf{y}\rangle =(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y})$, $\mathbf{y}\in\mathbb{V}$, then $\mathrm{P}_n\big|_{\mathbb{H}}$, the orthogonal projection of $\mathbb{H}$ onto $\mathbb{H}_n$  is given by $\mathrm{P}_n\mathbf{x}=\sum_{i=1}^n\left(\mathbf{x},e_i\right)e_i$. Hence in particular, $\mathrm{P}_n$ is the orthogonal projection from $\mathbb{H}$ onto $\text{span}\{e_1,\ldots,e_n\}$.  We define $\mathrm{B}^n(\mathbf{u}^n)=\mathrm{P}_n\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n)$, $\mathcal{C}^n(\mathbf{u}^n)=\mathrm{P}_n\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}^n)$, and $\Phi^n(\cdot,\mathbf{u}^n)=\mathrm{P}_n\Phi(\cdot,\mathbf{u}^n)\mathrm{P}_n$. We consider the following system of ODEs:
\begin{equation}\label{4.7}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
\d\left(\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}\right)&=-\langle\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}^n(t)+\mathrm{B}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(t))+\beta\mathcal{C}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v}\rangle\d t+\left(\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\d \mathrm{W}^n(t),\mathbf{v}\right),\\
\mathbf{u}^n(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0^n,
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
with $\mathbf{u}_0^n=\mathrm{P}_n\mathbf{u}_0,$ for all $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{H}_n$. Since $\mathrm{B}^n(\cdot)$ and $\mathcal{C}^n(\cdot)$ are  locally Lipschitz (see \eqref{lip} and \eqref{213}), and  $\Phi^n(\cdot,\cdot)$   is globally Lipschitz, the system (\ref{4.7}) has a unique $\mathbb{H}_n$-valued local strong solution $\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)$ and $\mathbf{u}^n\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T^*;\mathbb{H}_n))$ with $\mathscr{F}_t$-adapted continuous sample paths. 
Now we discuss about the a-priori energy estimates satisfied by the system \eqref{4.7}. Note that the energy estimates established in the next proposition is true for $r\geq 1$. 
\begin{proposition}[Energy estimates]\label{prop1}
	Let $\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)$ be the unique solution of the system of stochastic
	ODE's (\ref{4.7}) with $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathrm{L}^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{H}).$ Then, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{ener1}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+4\mu \int_0^{T}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t+4\beta\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \left(2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+14KT\right)e^{28KT}. 
\end{align}
\iffalse 
Moreover, for $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathrm{L}^{(r+1)}(\Omega;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}),$ for $r\geq 2$, we have 
\begin{align}\label{ener3}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}+{\mu  r(r+1)}\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}^n(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+2\beta (r+1)\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{2r}}^{2r}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\left\{2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\right]+{2KT(p-1)}\left(\frac{p-2}{p}\right)^{\frac{p-2}{2}}+3^{\frac{p}{2}}2^{\frac{3p-2}{2}}(p-1)^{p-1}K^pT^{\frac{p}{2}}\right\}\nonumber\\&\qquad\times \exp\left\{2\left(2Kp(p-1)+3^{\frac{p}{2}}2^{\frac{3p-2}{2}}(p-1)^{p-1}K^pT^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\right)T\right\}.
\end{align}
\fi 
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
	\noindent\textbf{Step (1):} Let us first define a sequence of stopping times $\tau_N$ by
	\begin{align}\label{stopm}
	\tau_N:=\inf_{t\geq 0}\left\{t:\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\geq N\right\},
	\end{align}
	for $N\in\mathbb{N}$. Applying the finite dimensional It\^{o} formula to the process
	$\|\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{4.9}
	\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=
	\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\langle\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}^n(s)+\mathrm{B}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(s))+\beta\mathcal{C}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(s)),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\rangle\d s
	\nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	s 
	+2\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\left(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d\mathrm{W}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\right).
	\end{align}
Note that $\langle\mathrm{B}^n(\mathbf{u}^n),\mathbf{u}^n\rangle=\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n),\mathbf{u}^n\rangle=0$. 
	Taking expectation in (\ref{4.9}), and using the fact that final term in the right hand side of the equality (\ref{4.9}) is a martingale with zero expectation, we find
	\begin{align}\label{4.13}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq
\mathbb{E}\left[	\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	s \right]\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[	\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+K\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\left(1+\|\mathbf{u}^n(s))\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}\right]\d
	s \right],
	\end{align}
	where we used  the Hypothesis \ref{hyp}  (H.2). Applying Gronwall's inequality in (\ref{4.13}), we get 
	\begin{align}\label{2.7}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq
	\left(\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+KT\right)e^{KT},
	\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$.  Note that for the indicator function $\chi$, 
	$$\mathbb{E}\left[{\chi}_{\{\tau_N^n<t\}}\right]=\mathbb{P}\Big\{\omega\in\Omega:\tau_N^n(\omega)<t\Big\},$$
	and using \eqref{stopm}, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{sq11}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]&=
	\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(\tau_N^n)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2{\chi}_{\{\tau_N^n<t\}}\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2
	{\chi}_{\{\tau_N^n\geq t\}}\right]\nonumber\\&\geq
	\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(\tau_N^n)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2{\chi}_{\{\tau_N^n<t\}}\right]\geq
	N^2\mathbb{P}\Big\{\omega\in\Omega:\tau_N^n<t\Big\}.
	\end{align}
	Using the energy estimate (\ref{2.7}), we find 
	\begin{align}\label{sq12}
	\mathbb{P}\Big\{\omega\in\Omega:\tau_N<t\Big\}&\leq
	\frac{1}{N^2}\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq
	\frac{1}{N^2}
	\left(\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+KT\right)e^{KT}.
	\end{align}
	Hence, we have
	\begin{align}\label{sq13}
	\lim_{N\to\infty}\mathbb{P}\Big\{\omega\in\Omega:\tau_N<t\Big\}=0, \ \textrm{
		for all }\ t\in [0,T],
	\end{align}
	and $t\wedge\tau_N\to t$ as $N\to\infty$. 
	Taking limit $N\to\infty$ in
	(\ref{2.7}) and using the \emph{monotone convergence theorem}, we get 
	\begin{align}\label{4.16}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq
	\left(\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+KT\right)e^{KT},
	\end{align}
	for $0\leq t\leq T$. Substituting (\ref{4.16}) in (\ref{4.13}), we arrive at
	\begin{align}\label{4.16a}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^{t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\right]\leq
	\left(\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+KT\right)e^{2KT},
	\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$. 
	\vskip 0.2cm
	\noindent\textbf{Step (2):} Let us now prove \eqref{ener1}.  Taking supremum from $0$
	to $T\wedge\tau_N$ before taking expectation in (\ref{4.9}), we obtain
	\begin{align}\label{4.17}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t+2\beta\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq
\mathbb{E}\left[	\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]
	+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d t\right]  \nonumber\\&\quad +2\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\left|\int_0^{t}\left(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d\mathrm{W}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\right)\right|\right].
	\end{align}
	Now we take the final term from the right hand side of the inequality \eqref{4.17} and use Burkholder-Davis-Gundy (see Theorem 1, \cite{BD} for the Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality and Theorem 1.1, \cite{DLB} for the best constant), H\"{o}lder  and Young's inequalities to deduce that
	\begin{align}\label{4.18}
&2\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\left|\int_0^{t}\left(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d\mathrm{W}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\right)\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\leq 2\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\left(\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{2} \mathbb{E}\Bigg[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\Bigg]+6\mathbb{E}\Bigg[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\Bigg].
	\end{align}
	Substituting (\ref{4.18})  in (\ref{4.17}), we find
	\begin{align}\label{4.20}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+4\mu \int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t+4\beta\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+14K\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\mathbb{E}\left[1+\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\d t,
	\end{align}
	where  we used the Hypothesis \ref{hyp} (H.2). Applying Gronwall's inequality in (\ref{4.20}), we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{4.21}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq\left(2\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+14KT\right)e^{14KT}.
	\end{align}
	Passing $N\to\infty$, using the monotone convergence theorem and then substituting (\ref{4.21}) in (\ref{4.20}), we finally obtain (\ref{ener1}). 
	\iffalse 
	\vskip 0.2cm
	\noindent\textbf{Step (3):} In order to prove the second estimate in (\ref{4.20}), we apply finite dimensional It\^o's formula to the process $\|\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p},$ for $p\geq 2$ to obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{4.23a}
	&\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}+2p\mu \int_0^{t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2p\beta\int_0^{t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\nonumber\\&=
	\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}-2p\int_0^{t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\langle\mathrm{B}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(s))+\beta\mathcal{C}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(s)),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\rangle\d s
	\nonumber\\&\quad
	+2p\int_0^{t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\left(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d\mathrm{W}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\right)
	+p\int_0^{t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\|\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	s\nonumber\\&\quad+2p(p-1)\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-4}\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}((\mathbf{u}^n(s)\otimes\mathbf{u}^n(s))(\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s)\Phi^*(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))))\d s.
	\end{align}
	Taking  supremum over time from $0$ to $T\wedge\tau_N$ and then taking expectation in (\ref{4.23a}), we get 
	\begin{align}\label{4.24a}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right]+2p\mu \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\qquad+2p\beta\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 
\mathbb{E}\left[	\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right]
	+2p\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\left|\int_0^{t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\left(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d\mathrm{W}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\right)\right|\right]
	\nonumber\\&\quad+p(2p-1)\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
		t\right]\nonumber\\&=\mathbb{E}\left[	\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right]+I_1+I_2,
	\end{align}
	where we used \eqref{b0}.
	\iffalse 
	Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, H\"older inequality and (\ref{2.15}), we get 
	\begin{align}\label{4.25z}
	I_3&\leq\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\beta*\nabla\mathbf{u}^n)(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathbb{H}}\d t \right]\nonumber\\&\leq \left(\int_0^T\beta(t)\d t\right) \mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\left(\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|^2_{\mathbb{V}}\d t\right) \right]\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{64}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^4\right]+\frac{16\gamma^2}{\mu ^2\delta^2}\underbrace{\mathbb{E}\left[\left(\mu \int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|^2_{\mathbb{V}}\d t\right)^2\right]}_{I_6}.
	\end{align}
	From (\ref{4.9}), it is clear that 
	\begin{align}\label{4.26z}
	I_6&\leq \mathbb{E}\Bigg[\bigg(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{\mu }\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d t+\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t 
	\nonumber\\&\quad+2\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\left(\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\d\mathrm{W}^n(t),\mathbf{u}^n(t)\right)
	\bigg)^2\Bigg]\nonumber\\&\leq 4\Bigg[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^4+\frac{T}{\mu ^2}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^4\d t
	+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right]^2 
	\nonumber\\&\quad+4\underbrace{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\left(\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\d\mathrm{W}^n(t),\mathbf{u}^n(t)\right)\right]^2}_{I_6}\Bigg],
	\end{align}
	where we used the fact that $\left(\sum_{i=1}^na_i\right)^2\leq n\sum_{i=1}^na_i^2$. Using the It\^o isometry, H\"older inequality and Young's inequality, we estimate $I_6$ as
	\begin{align}\label{4.27z}
	I_6&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{\mu ^2\delta^2}{2^{14}\gamma^2}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^4\right]+\frac{2^{12}\gamma^2}{\mu ^2\delta^2}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right]^2.
	\end{align}
	Substituting (\ref{4.27z})  in (\ref{4.26z}), we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{4.29z}
	I_6&\leq 4\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^4+\frac{4T}{\mu ^2}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^4\d t+\frac{\mu ^2\delta^2}{2^{10}\gamma^2}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^4\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+4\left(1+\frac{2^{12}\gamma^2}{\mu ^2\delta^2}\right)\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right]^2.
	\end{align}
	Using (\ref{4.29z}) in (\ref{4.25z}), we also have 
	\begin{align}\label{4.30z}
	I_3&\leq \frac{1}{32}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^4\right] +\frac{2^6\gamma^2}{\mu ^2\delta^2}\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^4+\frac{2^6T\gamma^2}{\mu ^4\delta^2}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{f}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^4\d t\nonumber\\&\quad+\frac{2^6\gamma^2}{\mu ^2\delta^2}\left(1+\frac{2^{12}\gamma^2}{\mu ^2\delta^2}\right)\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right]^2.
	\end{align}
	\fi
	Using Burkholder-Davis-Gundy, H\"older's and Young's inequalities, we estimate $I_1$ as 
	\begin{align}\label{4.31z}
	I_1&\leq 2p\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{4p-2}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\leq  2p\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-1}\left(\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{4}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right]+3^p(4(2p-1))^{2p-1}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right]^{p}.
	\end{align}
	Using H\"older's and Young's inequalities, we estimate $I_2$ as 
	\begin{align}\label{4.32z}
	I_2\leq \frac{1}{4}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right]+(4(p-1))^{p-1}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right]^p.
	\end{align}
	Combining (\ref{4.31z})-(\ref{4.32z}) and using it in (\ref{4.24a}), we arrive at
	\begin{align}\label{4.35z}
	&\frac{1}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right]+2p\mu \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\qquad+2p\beta\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p-2}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq  \mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right] +\left[3^p(4(2p-1))^{2p-1}+(4(p-1))^{p-1}\right]\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right]^p\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right]+2^{p-1}K^pT^{p-1}\left[3^p(4(2p-1))^{2p-1}+(4(p-1))^{p-1}\right]\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\left(1+\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right)\d t\right],
	\end{align}
	where in the final step we used the Hypothesis \ref{hyp} (H.2). Applying  Gronwall's inequality in (\ref{4.35z}), we obtain
	\begin{align}\label{4.36z}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right]\leq \left(2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^{2p}\right]+{C(K,p,T)T}\right)e^{C(K,p,T)T},
	\end{align}
	where $C(K,p,T)=2^{p}K^pT^{p-1}\left[3^p(4(2p-1))^{2p-1}+(4(p-1))^{p-1}\right]$.
	Passing $N\to\infty$, using the monotone convergence theorem in (\ref{4.36z}) and then using it in (\ref{4.35z}), we arrive at  (\ref{ener2}).

	\vskip 0.2cm
	\noindent\textbf{Step (4):} Applying It\^o's formula to the process $\|\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p}}^{p},$ we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{322}
&	\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\nonumber\\&=\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p-p\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\langle\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}^n(s)+\mathrm{B}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(s))+\beta\mathcal{C}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(s)),|\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{p-1}\mathbf{u}^n(s)\rangle\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+\frac{p(p-1)}{2}\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\mathrm{Tr}_{\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))}\left(|\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{{p-2}}\right)\d s +p\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\left(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d\mathrm{W}^n(s),|\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{p-2}\mathbf{u}^n(s)\right).
	\end{align}
	Taking expectation and using the fact that the final term from the right hand side of the equality \eqref{322} is martingale 
	\begin{align}\label{323}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p+\mu  p(p-1)\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\||\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\beta p\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+p}}^{r+p}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&=\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right] +\frac{p(p-1)}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\mathrm{Tr}_{\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))}(|\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{p-2})\d s\right],
	\end{align}
	where we used \eqref{2.12} also. Using \eqref{35}, we estimate $\mathrm{Tr}_{\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}^n)}(|\mathbf{u}^n|^{p-2})$ as 
	\begin{align}\label{324}
\mathrm{Tr}_{\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}^n)}(|\mathbf{u}^n|^{p-2})&\leq \||\mathbf{u}^n|^{p-2}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p,\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{p}{p-1}})}\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}^n)\|_{\gamma(\mathbb{H},\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p)}^2\nonumber\\&\leq \|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p}}^{p-2}\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}^n)\|_{\gamma(\mathbb{H},\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p)}^2\nonumber\\&\leq K\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{p}}^{p-2}\left(1+\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^2\right)\nonumber\\&\leq K\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^{p-2}\left(1+\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^2\right)\nonumber\\&\leq K\left(\frac{2}{p}\left(\frac{p-2}{p}\right)^{\frac{p-2}{2}}+2\|\mathbf{u}^n\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right),
	\end{align}
where we used  Young's inequality. Substituting \eqref{323} in \eqref{324}, we find 
\begin{align}\label{325}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p+\mu  p(p-1)\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\||\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\beta p\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+p}}^{r+p}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right]+{KT(p-1)}\left(\frac{p-2}{p}\right)^{\frac{p-2}{2}}+Kp(p-1)\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\d s\right]
\end{align}
Applying Gronwall's inequality in \eqref{325}, we get 
\begin{align}\label{326}
\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right]&\leq\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right]+{KT(p-1)}\left(\frac{p-2}{p}\right)^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\right\}e^{KTp(p-1)}.
\end{align}
Passing $N\to\infty$ in \eqref{326} and then substituting it in \eqref{323}, we finally have 
	\begin{align}\label{327}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p+\mu  p(p-1)\int_0^{t}\||\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+\beta p\int_0^{t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+p}}^{r+p}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right]+{KT(p-1)}\left(\frac{p-2}{p}\right)^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\right\}e^{2KTp(p-1)}.
\end{align}
for all $t\in[0,T]$. 

	\vskip 0.2cm
\noindent\textbf{Step (5):} Let us take supremum over time from $0$ to $T\wedge\tau_N$ before taking expectation in \eqref{322} to obtain 
\begin{align}\label{328}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p+\mu  p(p-1)\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\||\mathbf{u}^n(t)|^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+\beta p\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+p}}^{r+p}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right] +\frac{p(p-1)}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\mathrm{Tr}_{\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))}(|\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{p-2})\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+p\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\left|\int_0^{t}\left(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d\mathrm{W}^n(s),|\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{p-2}\mathbf{u}^n(s)\right)\right|\right].
\end{align}
Note that $$M_t:=\int_0^{t}\left(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d\mathrm{W}^n(s),|\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{p-2}\mathbf{u}^n(s)\right)$$ is an $\mathbb{R}$-valued martingale with quadratic variation process 
\begin{align*}
[M]_t&=\int_0^t\sum_{j=1}^n(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))e_j,|\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{p-2}\mathbf{u}^n(s))^2\d s
\end{align*}
Using H\"older's inequality and \eqref{35}, we estimate $[M]_t$ as 
\begin{align*}
[M]_t&\leq\int_0^t\sum_{j=1}^n\|\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))e_j\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^2\||\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{p-1}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{p}{p-1}}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq \int_0^t\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\langle \mathcal{J}[\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))e_j],\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))e_j\rangle_{\mathbb{X}'\times\mathbb{X}}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^{2(p-1)}\d s\nonumber\\&=\int_0^t\mathrm{Tr}_{\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))}(\mathcal{J})\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^{2(p-1)}\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\int_0^t\|\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\|_{\gamma(\mathbb{H},\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p)}^2\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^{2(p-1)}\d s,
\end{align*}
for all $t\in[0,T]$, where $\mathcal{J}$ is the duality mapping on $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p$ and $\|\mathcal{J}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{X},\mathbb{X}')}=1$. We use Burkholder-Davis-Gundy, H\"older's and Young's inequalities to estimate the final term from the right hand side of the inequality in \eqref{328} as 
\begin{align}\label{3.29}
&p\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}|M_t|\right]\leq \sqrt{3}p\mathbb{E}\left\{[M]_{T\wedge\tau_N}^{1/2}\right\}\nonumber\\&\leq \sqrt{3}p\mathbb{E}\left\{\left(\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\gamma(\mathbb{H},\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p)}^2\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^{2(p-1)}\d t\right)^{1/2}\right\}\nonumber\\&\leq\sqrt{3}p\mathbb{E}\left\{\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^{p-1}\left(\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\gamma(\mathbb{H},\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p)}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\right\}\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{1}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^{p}\right]+3^{\frac{p}{2}}(2(p-1))^{p-1}K^p\mathbb{E}\left[\left(\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}(1+\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^2)\d t\right)^{p/2}\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T\wedge\tau_N]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^{p}\right]+3^{\frac{p}{2}}(2(p-1))^{p-1}K^p2^{\frac{p-2}{2}}T^{\frac{p}{2}}\nonumber\\&\quad+3^{\frac{p}{2}}(2(p-1))^{p-1}K^p2^{\frac{p-2}{2}}T^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\d t\right].
\end{align}
Substituting \eqref{324} and \eqref{3.29} in \eqref{328}, we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{330}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p+2\mu  p(p-1)\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\||\mathbf{u}^n(s)|^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s+2\beta p\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+p}}^{r+p}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right]+{2KT(p-1)}\left(\frac{p-2}{p}\right)^{\frac{p-2}{2}}+3^{\frac{p}{2}}2^{\frac{3p-2}{2}}(p-1)^{p-1}K^pT^{\frac{p}{2}}\nonumber\\&\quad+\left\{2Kp(p-1)+3^{\frac{p}{2}}2^{\frac{3p-2}{2}}(p-1)^{p-1}K^pT^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\right\}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\d t\right].
\end{align}
Applying Gronwall's inequality in \eqref{330}, we find 
\begin{align}\label{331} 
\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right]&\leq\left\{2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^p}^p\right]+{2KT(p-1)}\left(\frac{p-2}{p}\right)^{\frac{p-2}{2}}+3^{\frac{p}{2}}2^{\frac{3p-2}{2}}(p-1)^{p-1}K^pT^{\frac{p}{2}}\right\}\nonumber\\&\quad\times \exp\left\{\left(2Kp(p-1)+3^{\frac{p}{2}}2^{\frac{3p-2}{2}}(p-1)^{p-1}K^pT^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\right)T\right\}.
\end{align}
Taking $N\to\infty$ in \eqref{331} and then substituting it back in \eqref{330}, we finally obtain \eqref{ener3}. 
\fi 
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}\label{lem3.6}
	For $r>3$ and any functions $$\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}))\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})),$$  we have
	\begin{align}\label{3.11y}
	&\int_0^Te^{-\eta t}\Big[\mu \langle \mathrm{A}(\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle +\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle \Big]\d t +\left(\eta+\frac{L}{2}\right)\int_0^Te^{-\eta t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\geq \frac{1}{2}\int_0^Te^{-\eta t}\|\Phi(t, \mathbf{u}(t)) - \Phi(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d t,
	\end{align}
	where $\eta$ is defined in \eqref{215}. 
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
	Multiplying (\ref{fe}) with $e^{-\eta t}$, integrating over time $t\in(0,T)$, and using  the Hypothesis \ref{hyp} (H.3), we obtain (\ref{3.11y}). 
\end{proof}

\iffalse 
\begin{remark}
	In order to prove (\ref{energy}), one can directly apply It\^o's formula to the process $\|\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)\|^{2p}_{\mathbb{H}}$, for $p=1,2$. Using Lemma \ref{lem_ap},we can replace the estimate (\ref{4.25z}) by
	\begin{align}\label{4.25y}
	I_3&\leq\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\beta*\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{\mu }{4}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right]+\frac{1}{\mu }\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\beta*\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \left(\frac{\mu }{4}+\frac{\gamma^2}{\mu \delta^2}\right)\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right].
	\end{align}
	Substituting this in (\ref{4.24a}) yields an additional condition that $\mu \geq \frac{2\gamma}{\delta}$ or $\mu \leq \frac{3\mu }{2}$, which we would like to avoid. 
\end{remark}
\fi 
\subsection{Existence and uniqueness of strong solution} Our next aim is to show that the system (\ref{32}) has a unique global strong solution by exploiting the monotonicity property (see (\ref{3.11y})) and a stochastic generalization of the Minty-Browder technique. The local monotonicity property of the linear and nonlinear operators and a stochastic generalization of the Minty-Browder technique has been used to obtain solvability results in the works \cite{MJSS,SSSP,ICAM,MTM,MTM6}, etc.
\begin{theorem}\label{exis}
	Let $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{H})$, for $r> 3$ be given.  Then there exists a \emph{pathwise unique strong solution}
	$\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to the system (\ref{32}) such that \begin{align*}\mathbf{u}&\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}))\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})),\end{align*} with $\mathbb{P}$-a.s., continuous trajectories in $\mathbb{H}$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	The global solvability results of the system (\ref{32}) is divided into the following steps.
	
	\vskip 0.2cm
	\noindent\textbf{Step (1):} \emph{Finite-dimensional (Galerkin) approximation of the system (\ref{32}):} Let us first consider the following Galerkin approximated It\^{o} stochastic differential equation satisfied by $\{\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)\}$:
	\begin{equation}\label{4.37}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\d\mathbf{u}^n(t)&=-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t))\d
	t+\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\d\mathrm{W}^n(t),\\
	\mathbf{u}^n(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0^n,
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
	where
	$\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot))=\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)+\mathrm{B}^n\left(\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)\right)+\beta\mathcal{C}^n(\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot))$. Applying It\^o's formula to the finite dimensional process $e^{-2\eta t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{4.38}
	e^{-2\eta t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\int_0^te^{-2\eta s}\langle 2\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(s))+2\eta \mathbf{u}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\rangle\d
	s\nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^te^{-2\eta s}\|\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d
	s+2\int_0^te^{-2\eta s}\left(\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\d\mathrm{W}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\right),
		\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$. Note that the final term from the right hand side of the equality (\ref{4.38}) is a martingale and on taking expectation, we get 
	\begin{align}\label{4.39}
	\mathbb{E}\left[e^{-2\eta t}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]&=\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]-\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^te^{-2\eta s}\langle2\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(s))+2\eta\mathbf{u}^n(s),\mathbf{u}^n(s)\rangle\d
	s\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t
	e^{-2\eta s}\|\Phi^n(s,\mathbf{u}^n(s))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right],
	\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$.
	
	\vskip 0.2cm
	\noindent\textbf{Step (2):} \emph{Weak convergence of the
		sequences $\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)$, $\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot))$ and
		$\Phi^n(\cdot,\cdot)$.} 
	We know that 	$\mathrm{L}^2\left(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\right)\cong	(\mathrm{L}^{2}\left(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^1(0,T;\mathbb{H})\right)'$ and  the space $\mathrm{L}^{2}\left(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^1(0,T;\mathbb{H})\right)$ is separable. Moreover,  the spaces $\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}))$ and $\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}))$ are  reflexive ($\mathbb{X}''=\mathbb{X}$).  From the energy estimate \eqref{ener1} given in Proposition \ref{prop1}, we know that the sequence $\{\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)\}$ is bounded independent of $n$ in the spaces $\mathrm{L}^2\left(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\right)$, $\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}))$ and $\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}))$. Then applying the	Banach-Alaoglu theorem, we can extract a subsequence	$\{\mathbf{u}^{n_k}\}$ of $\{\mathbf{u}^n\}$ such that	(for simplicity, we denote the index $n_k$ by $n$):
	\begin{equation}\label{4.40}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\mathbf{u}^n&\xrightarrow{w^{*}} \mathbf{u}\textrm{ in
	}\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T ;\mathbb{H})),\\ 
	\mathbf{u}^n&\xrightarrow{w} \mathbf{u}\textrm{ in
	}\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T ;\mathbb{V})),\\  
\mathbf{u}^n&\xrightarrow{w} \mathbf{u}\textrm{ in
}\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T ;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1})),\\
	\mathbf{u}^n(T)&\xrightarrow{w}\xi \in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{H}),\\
	\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n)&\xrightarrow{w} \mathrm{G}_0\textrm{ in
	}\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T ;\mathbb{V}'))+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}})).
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
Using H\"older's inequality, interpolation inequality (see \eqref{211})  and Proposition \ref{prop1}, we justify the final convergence  in (\ref{4.5})  in the following way: 
	\begin{align}\label{4.41}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^T\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d t\right]\right|\nonumber\\&\leq \mu\mathbb{E}\left[ \left|\int_0^T(\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t),\nabla\mathbf{v}(t))\d t\right|\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^T\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}^n(t)\rangle\d t\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^T\langle|\mathbf{u}^n(t)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d t\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\mu\mathbb{E}\left[ \int_0^T\|\nabla\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\nabla\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\d t\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{2(r+1)}{r-1}}}\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r}\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \mu \mathbb{E}\left[\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\mathbb{E}\left[\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{1}{r-1}}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right)^{\frac{r-3}{2(r-1)}}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\mathbb{E}\left[\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{r}{r+1}}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\mu \left\{\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)\right\}^{1/2}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)\right\}^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\quad+T^{\frac{r-3}{2(r-1)}}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)\right\}^{\frac{1}{r-1}}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left(\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\right\}^{\frac{r-3}{2(r-1)}}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)\right\}^{\frac{1}{2}}\nonumber\\&\quad+\beta\left\{\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)\right\}^{\frac{r}{r+1}}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)\right\}^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\leq  C(\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right],\mu ,T,\beta,K)\left[\left\{\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right)\right\}^{1/2}+\mathbb{E}\left\{\left(\int_0^T\|\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right)\right\}^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\right],
	\end{align}
	for all $\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}))\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}))$. 
	Using the Hypothesis \ref{hyp} (H.2) and energy	estimates  in Proposition \ref{prop1},	we also have
	\begin{align}\label{4.42}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T
	}\|\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d
	t\right]&\leq K\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\left(1+\|\mathbf{u}^n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq
	KT \left(1+\left(2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+14KT\right)e^{28KT}\right)<+\infty.
	\end{align}
	The right hand side of the estimate \eqref{4.42} is independent of $n$ and thus we can extract a subsequence
	$\{\Phi_{n_k}(\cdot,\mathbf{u}_{n_k})\},$ of $\{\Phi^n(\cdot,\mathbf{u}^n)\}$ such that (relabeled as $\{\Phi^n(\cdot,\mathbf{u}^n)\}$)
	\begin{equation}\label{4.43z}
	\Phi^n(\cdot,\mathbf{u}^n)\mathrm{P}_n\xrightarrow{w}
	\Phi(\cdot)\ \textrm{ in	}\ \mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T ;\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}(\mathbb{H}))).
	\end{equation}
	
		\vskip 0.2cm
	\noindent\textbf{Step (3):} \emph{It\^o stochastic differential satisfied by $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$.} 	We make use of the discussions  in Theorem 7.5 \cite{chow}, to obtain the It\^{o} stochastic differential satisfied by $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$. Note that we cannot apply the results available in Theorem 7.5 \cite{chow} here directly as we have the weak convergence of the nonlinear term in  $\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T ;\mathbb{V}'))+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}})).$ Due to technical reasons, we extend the time	interval from $[0,T]$ to an open interval $(-\varepsilon, T+\varepsilon)$ with	$\varepsilon>0$, and set the terms in the equation (\ref{4.37}) equal to	zero outside the interval $[0,T]$. Let $\phi\in\mathrm{H}^1(-\mu,T+\mu)$ be such that $\phi(0)=1$. For $\mathbf{v}_m\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1},$ we define $\mathbf{v}_m(t)=\phi(t)\mathbf{v}_m$.	Applying It\^{o}'s formula to the process	$(\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}_m(t))$, one obtains
	\begin{align}\label{sq63}
	(\mathbf{u}^n(T),\mathbf{v}_m(T ))&=(\mathbf{u}^n(0),\mathbf{v}_m)+\int_0^{T	}(\mathbf{u}^n(t),\dot{\mathbf{v}}_m(t))\d	t-\int_0^{T	}(\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v}_m(t))\d t \nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^{T	}\left(\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\d\mathrm{W}^n(t),\mathbf{v}_m(t)\right),
	\end{align}
where $\dot{\mathbf{v}}_m(t)=\frac{\d\phi(t)}{\d t}\mathbf{v}_m$.	Note that, we can take the term by term limit $n\to\infty$ in (\ref{sq63}) by	making use of the weak convergences given in (\ref{4.40}) and (\ref{4.43z}).	For instance, we consider the stochastic integral present in  the equality (\ref{sq63}),	with $m$ fixed. Let $\mathcal{P}_{T}$ denotes the class of	predictable processes with values in	$\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}(\mathbb{H})))$ with the inner	product defined by	$$(\Phi,\Psi)_{\mathcal{P}_{T}}=\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}(\Phi(t)\mathrm{Q}\Psi^*(t))\d	t\right], \ \textrm{ for all }\ \Phi,\Psi\in\mathcal{P}_{T}.$$	Let us define a map $\upsilon:\mathcal{P}_{T}\to	\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T))$ by	$$\upsilon(\Phi)=\displaystyle{\int_0^t}(\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{v}_m(s)),$$ for	all $t\in[0,T]$. Note that the map $\upsilon$ is linear and	continuous. The weak convergence  of	$\Phi^n(\cdot,\mathbf{u}^n)\mathrm{P}_n\xrightarrow{w} \Phi(\cdot)$ in	$\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T ;\mathcal{L}_Q(\mathbb{H})))$ (see	(\ref{4.43z})) implies that	$\left(\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\mathrm{P}_n,\zeta\right)_{\mathcal{P}_{T}}\to	\left(\Phi(t)\d\mathrm{W}(t),\zeta\right)_{\mathcal{P}_{T}},$ for all	$\zeta\in\mathcal{P}_{T}$ as $n\to\infty$. From this, as	$n\to\infty$, we conclude that
	\begin{align*}\upsilon(\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t)))&=\int_0^t(\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{v}_m(s))
	\to \int_0^t(\Phi(t)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{v}_m(s)),\end{align*} for all $t\in[0,T]$	and for each $m$.	Passing to limits term wise in the equation (\ref{sq63}), we get
	\begin{align}\label{sq64}
	(\xi,\mathbf{v}_m)\phi(T)&=(\mathbf{u}_0,\mathbf{v}_m)+\int_0^{T
	}(\mathbf{u}(t),\dot{\mathbf{v}}_k)\d
	t-\int_0^{T
	}\phi(t)\langle\mathrm{G}_0(t),\mathbf{v}_m\rangle\d t +\int_0^{T
	}\phi(t)\left(\Phi(t)\d \mathrm{W}(t),\mathbf{v}_m\right).
	\end{align}
	Let us now choose a subsequence $\{\phi_k\}\in\mathrm{H}^1(-\mu,T+\mu)$	with $\phi_k(0)=1$, for $k\in\mathbb{N}$, such that	$\phi_k\to\displaystyle{\chi}_t$ and the time derivative of $\phi_k$	converges to $\delta_t$, where $\displaystyle{\chi}_t(s)=1$, for	$s\leq t$ and $0$ otherwise, and $\delta_t(s)=\delta(t-s)$ is the	Dirac $\delta$-distribution. Using $\phi_k$ in place of $\phi$ in	(\ref{sq64}) and then letting $k\to\infty$, we obtain
	\begin{align}\label{sq65}
	(\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v}_m)&=(\mathbf{u}_0,\mathbf{v}_m)-\int_0^{t}\langle\mathrm{G}_0(s),\mathbf{v}_m\rangle\d s +\int_0^{t}\left(\Phi(s)\d \mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{v}_m\right),
	\end{align}
	for all $0<t< T$ with $(\mathbf{u}(T),\mathbf{v}_m)=(\xi,\mathbf{v}_m)$ and for any $\mathbf{v}_m\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$. Remember that $\mathcal{V}\subset\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}\subset\mathbb{H}$ and $\mathcal{V}$ is dense in $\mathbb{H}$. Therefore, $\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$ is dense in $\mathbb{H}$ and the above equation holds for any $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$.   Thus, we	have
	\begin{align}\label{sq66}
	(\mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v})=(\mathbf{u}_0,\mathbf{v})-\int_0^t\langle\mathrm{G}_0(s),\mathbf{v}\rangle\d s +\int_0^t(\Phi(s)\d
	\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{v}),\ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.,}
	\end{align}
for all $0<t<T$	with $(\mathbf{u}(T),\mathbf{v})=(\xi,\mathbf{v})$, for all $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$. Hence, $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ satisfies the following stochastic differential: 
	\begin{equation}\label{4.44}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\d\mathbf{u}(t)&=-\mathrm{G}_0(t)\d
	t+\Phi(t)\d\mathrm{W}(t),\\
	\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0,
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
	for $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{H})$. 
	
		\vskip 0.2cm
	\noindent\textbf{Step (4):} \emph{Energy equality satisfied by $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$.} 
Let us now establish the energy equality satisfied by $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$. Note that such an energy equality is not immediate due to the final convergence in \eqref{4.40} and we cannot apply the infinite dimensional It\^o formula available in the literature for semimartingales (see Theorem 1, \cite{GK1}, Theorem 6.1, \cite{Me}). We follow \cite{CLF} to obtain an approximation of $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ in bounded domains such that the approximations are bounded and converge in both Sobolev and Lebesgue spaces simultaneously (one can see \cite{KWH} for such an approximation in periodic domains). We approximate $\mathbf{u}(t),$ for each $t\in(0,T)$ and $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. by using the finite-dimensional space spanned by the first $n$ eigenfunctions of the Stokes operator as (Theorem 4.3, \cite{CLF})
\begin{align}\label{3.32}\mathbf{u}_n(t):=\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\mathbf{u}(t)=\sum_{\lambda_j<n^2}e^{-\lambda_j/n}\langle\mathbf{u}(t),e_j\rangle e_j.\end{align}
For notational convenience, we use $\mathbf{u}_n$ for approximations of the type \eqref{3.32} and $\mathbf{u}^n$ for Galerkin approximations. Note first that 
\begin{align}\label{3p34}
\|\mathbf{u}_n\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2=\|\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2=\sum_{\lambda_j<n^2}e^{-2\lambda_j/n}|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2\leq\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2=\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2<+\infty,
\end{align}
for all $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{H}$. It can also be seen that
\begin{align}\label{3.37}
\|(\mathrm{I}-\mathrm{P}_{1/n})\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\langle\mathbf{u},\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\mathbf{u}\rangle+\|\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\nonumber\\&=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2-2\sum_{\lambda_j<n^2}e^{-\lambda_j/n}|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2+\sum_{\lambda_j<n^2}e^{-2\lambda_j/n}|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2\nonumber\\&=\sum_{\lambda_j<n^2}(1-e^{-\lambda_j/n})^2|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2+\sum_{\lambda_j\geq n^2}|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2,
\end{align}
for all $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{H}$. Note that the final term in the right hand side of the equality \eqref{3.37} tends zero as $n\to\infty$, since the series $\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2$ is convergent. The first term on the right hand side of the equality can be bounded by $$\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}(1-e^{-\lambda_j/n})^2|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2\leq 4\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2=4\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2<+\infty.$$ By using dominated convergence theorem, we can interchange the limit and sum and hence we get 
$$\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}(1-e^{-\lambda_j/n})^2|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\lim_{n\to\infty}(1-e^{-\lambda_j/n})^2|\langle\mathbf{u},e_j\rangle|^2=0.$$
  Hence $\|(\mathrm{I}-\mathrm{P}_{1/n})\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\to 0$ as $n\to\infty$ and $\|\mathrm{I}-\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H})}\to 0$ as $n\to\infty$. Moreover, for $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{V}'$, we have 
  \begin{align}\label{3.34}
\|(\mathrm{I}-\mathrm{P}_{1/n})\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2&=\|\mathrm{A}^{-1/2}(\mathrm{I}-\mathrm{P}_{1/n})\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2=\|(\mathrm{I}-\mathrm{P}_{1/n})\mathrm{A}^{-1/2}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathrm{I}-\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H})}^2\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\to 0\ \text{ as }\ n\to\infty. 
  \end{align}
The authors in \cite{CLF}  showed that such an approximation  satisfies: 
\begin{enumerate}
	\item [(1)] $\mathbf{u}_n(t)\to\mathbf{u}(t)$ in $\mathbb{H}_0^1$ with $\|\mathbf{u}_n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}^1}\leq C\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}^1}$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. and a.e. $t\in[0,T]$, 
	\item [(2)] $\mathbf{u}_n(t)\to\mathbf{u}(t)$ in $\mathbb{L}^{p}(\mathcal{O})$ with $\|\mathbf{u}_n(t)\|_{{\mathbb{L}}^{p}}\leq C\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{{\mathbb{L}}^{p}}$, for any $p\in(1,\infty)$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. and a.e. $t\in[0,T]$, 
	\item [(3)] $\mathbf{u}_n(t)$ is divergence free and zero on $\partial\mathcal{O}$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. and a.e. $t\in[0,T]$.
\end{enumerate}
In (1) and (2), $C$ is an absolute constant.   Note that for $n\leq 4$, $\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A})\subset\mathbb{H}^2\subset\mathbb{L}^p,$ for all $p\in(1,\infty)$ (cf. \cite{CLF}). Since $e_j$'s are the eigenfunctions of the Stokes' operator $\mathrm{A}$, we get $e_j\in\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A})\subset\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$.  Taking $\mathbf{v}=e_j$ in \eqref{sq66}, multiplying by $e^{-\lambda_j/n}e_j$ and then summing over all $j$ such that $\lambda_j<n^2$, we see that $\mathbf{u}_n(\cdot)$ satisfies the following It\^o stochastic differential: 
\begin{align}\label{333} 
\mathbf{u}_n(t)={\mathbf{u}_0}_n-\int_0^t{\mathrm{G}_0}_n(s)\d s+\int_0^t\Phi_n(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),
\end{align}
where ${\mathbf{u}_0}_n=\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\mathbf{u}_0$, ${\mathrm{G}_0}_n=\mathrm{P}_{1/n}{\mathrm{G}_0}$ and  $\Phi_n=\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\Phi$. It is clear that the equation \eqref{333} has a unique solution $\mathbf{u}_n(\cdot)$ (see \cite{DaZ}). One can apply It\^o's formula to the process $\|\mathbf{u}_n(\cdot)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$ to find 
\begin{align}\label{334}
\|\mathbf{u}_n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=\|{\mathbf{u}_0}_n\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\int_0^t({\mathrm{G}_0}_n(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s))\d s+2\int_0^t(\Phi_n(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s))\nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^t\|\Phi_n(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s,
\end{align}
for all $t\in(0,T)$. 
 With the convergence given in \eqref{3.37}, one can show that 
\begin{align}\label{337}
\|\Phi_n-\Phi\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2&=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\|(\Phi_n-\Phi)e_j\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\|(\mathrm{P}_{1/n}-\mathrm{I})\Phi e_j\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq \|\mathrm{I}-\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H})}^2\|\Phi\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\to 0,
\end{align}
as $n\to\infty$. Thus $\|\Phi_n(t)-\Phi(t)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\to 0$, for a.e. $t\in(0,T)$ and $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. Moreover, we have 
\begin{align}\label{338}
\|\Phi_n\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2&=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\|\Phi_n e_j\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\sum_{\lambda_k<n^2}e^{-2\lambda_k/n}|(\Phi e_j,e_k)|^2\leq\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}|(\Phi e_j,e_k)|^2\nonumber\\&=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\|\Phi e_j\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2=\|\Phi\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2. 
\end{align}
Once again, using the convergence given in \eqref{3.37}, we get 
\begin{align}\label{3.40}
\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]&\leq \|\mathrm{I}-\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H})}^2\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\to 0,
\end{align}
as $n\to\infty$, since $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H}))$. Thus, it is immediate that
\begin{align}\label{3.41}
\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_n(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\to \mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right],\ \text{ as } \ n\to\infty,
\end{align}
for a.e. $t\in[0,T]$. A calculation similar to \eqref{3.40} yields 
\begin{align}\label{3.42}
\mathbb{E}\left[\|{\mathbf{u}_0}_n\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\to\mathbb{E}\left[\|{\mathbf{u}_0}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\ \text{ as } \ n\to\infty. 
\end{align}
We also need the fact \begin{align}\label{335}\|\mathbf{u}_n-\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}))}, \ \text{ as }\ n\to\infty,\end{align} which  follows from (2). Since $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}))$ and the fact that $\|\mathbf{u}^n(t,\omega)-\mathbf{u}(t,\omega)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}\to 0$, for a.e. $t\in[0,T]$ and $\mathbb{P}$-a.s., one can obtain the above convergence by an application of the dominated convergence theorem (with the dominating function $(1+C)\|\mathbf{u}(t,\omega)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}$). 

Since $\mathrm{G}_0\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}'))+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;{\widetilde\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}))$, we can write down $\mathrm{G}_0$ as $\mathrm{G}_0=\mathrm{G}_0^1+\mathrm{G}_0^2$, where $\mathrm{G}_0^1\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}'))$ and $\mathrm{G}_0^2\in\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;{\widetilde\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}))$. Note that $1<\frac{r+1}{r}<\frac{4}{3}$. We use the approximation
\begin{align*}
{\mathrm{G}_{0}^1}_n(t):=\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\mathrm{G}_0^1(t)=\sum_{\lambda_j<n^2}e^{-\lambda_j/n}\langle\mathrm{G}_0^1(t),e_j\rangle e_j,
\end{align*}
and by using \eqref{3.34}, we get 
\begin{align}
\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|{\mathrm{G}_{0}^1}_n(t)-{\mathrm{G}_{0}^1}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d t\right]\to 0,\ \text{ as } \ n\to\infty. 
\end{align}
Similarly, for $\mathrm{G}_0^2$, we use the approximation 
\begin{align*}
{\mathrm{G}_{0}^2}_n(t):=\mathrm{P}_{1/n}\mathrm{G}_0^2(t)=\sum_{\lambda_j<n^2}e^{-\lambda_j/n}\langle\mathrm{G}_0^2(t),e_j\rangle e_j,
\end{align*}
and by using (2), we get 
\begin{align}
\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|{\mathrm{G}_{0}^2}_n(t)-{\mathrm{G}_{0}^2}(t)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}^{{\frac{r+1}{r}}}\d t\right]\to 0,\ \text{ as } \ n\to\infty. 
\end{align}
By defining ${\mathrm{G}_0}_n={\mathrm{G}_{0}^1}_n+{\mathrm{G}_{0}^2}_n$, one can easily see that 
 \begin{align}\label{336}\|{\mathrm{G}_0}_n-\mathrm{G}_0\|_{\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}'))+\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;{\widetilde\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}))}\to 0, \ \text{ as }\ n\to\infty.\end{align}
Let us now consider 
\begin{align}\label{3.39}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t({\mathrm{G}_0}_n(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s))\d s-\int_0^t\langle{\mathrm{G}_0}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t\langle{\mathrm{G}_0}_n(s)-{\mathrm{G}_0}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s)\rangle\d s\right|\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t\langle{\mathrm{G}_0}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t\langle{\mathrm{G}_0^1}_n(s)-\mathrm{G}^1_0(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s)\rangle\d s\right|\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t\langle{\mathrm{G}_0^2}_n(s)-\mathrm{G}^2_0(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s)\rangle\d s\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t\langle{\mathrm{G}_0^1}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s\right|\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t\langle{\mathrm{G}_0^2}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\|{\mathrm{G}_0^1}_n(s)-{\mathrm{G}_0^1}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\|\mathbf{u}_n(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}\d s\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\|{\mathrm{G}_0^2}_n(s)-{\mathrm{G}_0^2}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}\|\mathbf{u}_n(s)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{r+1}}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\|\mathrm{G}_0^1(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\|\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}\d s\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\|\mathrm{G}_0^2(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}\|\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{r+1}}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq C\left[\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^t\|{\mathrm{G}_0^1}_n(s)-{\mathrm{G}_0^1}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^{2}\d s\right)\right]^{\frac{r}{r+1}}\left[\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{2}\d s\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{r+1}} \nonumber\\&\quad+C\left[\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^t\|{\mathrm{G}_0^2}_n(s)-{\mathrm{G}_0^2}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}\d s\right)\right]^{\frac{r}{r+1}}\left[\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\quad+\left[\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^t\|\mathrm{G}_0^1(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^{2}\d s\right)\right]^{\frac{r}{r+1}}\left[\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{2}\d s\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\nonumber\\&\quad+\left[\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^t\|\mathrm{G}_0^2(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}\d s\right)\right]^{\frac{r}{r+1}}\left[\mathbb{E}\left(\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\to 0,
\end{align}
as $ n\to\infty$, for all $t\in(0,T)$, where we used \eqref{335} and \eqref{336} (as one can show the above convergence by taking supremum over time $0\leq t\leq T$). Next, we establish the convergence of the stochastic integral. In order to do this, we consider 
\begin{align}\label{339}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t(\Phi_n(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s))-\int_0^t(\Phi_n(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s))\right|\right]\nonumber\\&
\leq\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t((\Phi_n(s)-\Phi(s))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s))\right|\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t(\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s))\right|\right].
\end{align}
Applying the Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality, we get 
\begin{align}\label{340}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\left|\int_0^t((\Phi_n(s)-\Phi(s))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s))\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\Phi_n(s)-\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\|\mathbf{u}_n(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\leq\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\left(\int_0^T\|\Phi_n(s)-\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right)^{1/2}\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\sqrt{3}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\right\}^{1/2}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\Phi_n(s)-\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]\right\}^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\to 0 \ \text{ as }\ n\to\infty,
\end{align}
using \eqref{337} and \eqref{3p34} and Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem. Once again an application of the Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality yields 
\begin{align}\label{341}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\left|\int_0^t(\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s))\right|\right]
\nonumber\\&\leq\sqrt{3}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}_n(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\right\}^{1/2}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]\right\}^{1/2}\to 0, 
\end{align}
as $n\to\infty$, for all $t\in(0,T)$, where we used  \eqref{3.40}. Combining  \eqref{340} and \eqref{341}, and then substituting it in \eqref{339}, we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{342}
&\left|\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t(\Phi_n(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s))-\int_0^t(\Phi_n(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}_n(s))\right]\right|\to 0,
\end{align}
as $n\to\infty$, for all $t\in(0,T)$. Finally, we consider 
\begin{align}\label{3.44}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\left|\int_0^t\|\Phi_n(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s-\int_0^t\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\|\Phi_n(s)-\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\left(\|\Phi_n(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}+\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\right)\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\|\Phi_n(s)-\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]\right\}^{1/2}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]\right\}^{1/2}\to 0,
\end{align}
as $n\to\infty$, for all $t\in(0,T)$, where we used \eqref{337} and \eqref{338}. Using the convergences given in  \eqref{3.41}, \eqref{3.42}, \eqref{3.39}, \eqref{342} and \eqref{3.44}, along a subsequence one can pass to limit in \eqref{334} to get the energy equality: 
\begin{align}\label{345}
\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=\|{\mathbf{u}_0}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\int_0^t\langle{\mathrm{G}_0}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s+\int_0^t\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s+2\int_0^t(\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)),
\end{align}
for a.e.  $t\in(0,T)$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. Note that the above It\^o's formula holds true only for a.e. $t\in[0,T],$ due to the convergence \eqref{3.41}. Now, we show that the It\^o formula \eqref{345} holds true for all $t\in[0,T]$. 


Let $\eta(t)$ be an even, positive, smooth function with compact support contained in the interval $(-1, 1)$, such that $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\eta(s)\d s=1$. Let us denote by $\eta^h$, a family of mollifiers related to the function $\eta$ as $$\eta^h(s):=h^{-1}\eta(s/h), \ \text{ for } \ h>0.$$ In particular, we get $\int_0^h\eta^h(s)\d s=\frac{1}{2}$. For any function $\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^p(0, T; \mathbb{X})$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s., where $\mathbb{X}$ is a Banach space, for $p\in[1,\infty)$, we define its mollification in time  $\mathbf{v}^h(\cdot)$ as 
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{v}^h(s):=(\mathbf{v}*\eta^h)(s)=\int_0^T\mathbf{v}(\tau)\eta^h(s-\tau)\d\tau, \ \text{ for }\ h\in(0,T). 
\end{align*}
From Lemma 2.5, \cite{GGP}, we know that this mollification has the following properties.  For any $\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^p(0, T; \mathbb{X})$, $\mathbf{v}^h\in\mathrm{C}^k([0,T);\mathbb{X}),$ $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. for all $k\geq 0$ and  \begin{align}\label{354}\lim_{h\to 0}\|\mathbf{v}^h-\mathbf{v}\|_{\mathrm{L}^p(0,T;\mathbb{X})}=0, \ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s}.\end{align} Moreover, $\|\mathbf{v}^h(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{X}}\to 0$, as $h\to 0$, for a.e. $t\in[0,T]$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. For some time $t_1>0$, we set 
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{u}^h(t)=\int_0^{t_1}\eta^h(t-s)\mathbf{u}(s)\d s=:(\eta^h*\mathbf{u})(t),
\end{align*}
with the parameter $h$ satisfying  $0<h<T-t_1$ and $h<t_1,$ where $\eta_h$ is the even mollifier given above. Note that $\mathbf{u}^h(\cdot)$ satisfies the following It\^o stochastic differential: 
\begin{align}
\mathbf{u}^h(t)=\mathbf{u}^h(0)+\int_0^t(\dot{\eta}^h*\mathbf{u})(s)\d s.
\end{align}
Applying It\^o's product formula to the process $(\mathbf{u}^h(\cdot),\mathbf{u}(\cdot))$, we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{356}
(\mathbf{u}^h(t),\mathbf{u}(t))&=(\mathbf{u}(0),\mathbf{u}^h(0))-\int_0^t\langle\mathbf{u}^h(s),\mathrm{G}_0(s)\rangle\d s+\int_0^t(\mathbf{u}^h(s),\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s))\nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^t(\mathbf{u}(s),(\dot{\eta}^h*\mathbf{u})(s))\d s+[\mathbf{u}^h,\mathbf{u}]_t,
\end{align}
where $[\mathbf{u}^h,\mathbf{u}]_t$ is the quadratic variation between the processes $\mathbf{u}^h(\cdot)$ and $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$. Using stochastic Fubini's theorem (\cite[Theorem 4.33]{DaZ}), we find 
\begin{align*}
[\mathbf{u}^h,\mathbf{u}]_t&=\left[\int_0^{t_1}\eta^h(t-s)\left(\int_0^s\Phi(\tau)\d\mathrm{W}(\tau)\right)\d s,\int_0^t\Phi(\tau)\d\mathrm{W}(\tau)\right]_t\nonumber\\&=\left[\int_0^{t_1}\left(\int_{\tau}^{t_1}\eta^h(t-s)\d s\right)\Phi(\tau)\d\mathrm{W}(\tau),\int_0^t\Phi(\tau)\d\mathrm{W}(\tau)\right]_t, 
\end{align*}
and hence 
\begin{align}
[\mathbf{u}^h,\mathbf{u}]_{t_1}&=\int_0^{t_1}\left(\int_{\tau}^{t_1}\eta^h(t_1-s)\d s\right)\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau. 
\end{align}
 Since the function $\eta^h$ is even in $(-h, h)$, we obtain $\dot{\eta}^h(r)=-\dot{\eta}^h(-r)$. Changing the order of integration, we get  (see \cite{KWH}) 
\begin{align}
\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}(s),(\dot{\eta}^h*\mathbf{u})(s))\d s&=\int_0^{t_1}\int_0^{t_1}\dot{\eta}^h(s-\tau)(\mathbf{u}(s),\mathbf{u}(\tau))\d s\d \tau\nonumber\\&=-\int_0^{t_1}\int_0^{t_1}\dot{\eta}^h(\tau-s)(\mathbf{u}(s),\mathbf{u}(\tau))\d s\d \tau\nonumber\\&= -\int_0^{t_1}\int_0^{t_1}\dot{\eta}^h(\tau-s)(\mathbf{u}(s),\mathbf{u}(\tau))\d\tau\d s \nonumber\\&= -\int_0^{t_1}\int_0^{t_1}\dot{\eta}^h(s-\tau)(\mathbf{u}(\tau),\mathbf{u}(s))\d s\d \tau=0. 
\end{align}
Thus, from \eqref{356}, it is immediate that 
\begin{align}\label{359}
(\mathbf{u}(t_1),\mathbf{u}^h(t_1))&=(\mathbf{u}(0),\mathbf{u}^h(0))-\int_0^{t_1}\langle\mathbf{u}^h(s),\mathrm{G}_0(s)\rangle\d s+\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}^h(s),\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s))\nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^{t_1}\left(\int_{\tau}^{t_1}\eta^h(t_1-s)\d s\right)\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau. 
\end{align}
Now, we let $h\to 0$ in \eqref{3.39}. For $\mathrm{G}_0=\mathrm{G}_0^1+\mathrm{G}_0^2$, where $\mathrm{G}_0^1\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{2}(0,T;\mathbb{V}'))$ and $\mathrm{G}_0^2\in\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;{\widetilde\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}))$,  we consider 
\begin{align}
&\mathbb{E}\left[ \left|\int_0^{t_1}\langle\mathrm{G}_0(s),\mathbf{u}^h(s)\rangle\d s-\int_0^{t_1}\langle\mathrm{G}_0(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}|\langle\mathrm{G}_0^1(s),\mathbf{u}^h(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle|\d s\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}|\langle\mathrm{G}_0^2(s),\mathbf{u}^h(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle|\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathrm{G}_0^1(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\|\mathbf{u}^h(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}\d s\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathrm{G}_0^2(s)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}\|\mathbf{u}^h(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{L}^{r+1}}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathrm{G}_0^1(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d s\right]\right\}^{1/2}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathbf{u}^h(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right]\right\}^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\quad+ \left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathrm{G}_0^2(s)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}\d s\right]\right\}^{\frac{r}{r+1}}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathbf{u}^h(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\right]\right\}^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\to 0\ \text{ as }\ h\to 0. 
\end{align}
Thus, along a subsequence, we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{360}
\lim_{h\to 0} \int_0^{t_1}\langle\mathrm{G}_0(s),\mathbf{u}^h(s)\rangle\d s= \int_0^{t_1}\langle\mathrm{G}_0(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s, \ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.}
\end{align}
Using Burkholder-Davis-Gundy and H\"older's inequalities, we have 
\begin{align}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t_1\in[0,T]}\left|\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}^h(s),\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s))-\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}(s),\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s))\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}^h(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\leq\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{s\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}^h(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\left(\int_0^T\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right)^{1/2}\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\sqrt{3}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{s\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}^h(s)-\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\right\}^{1/2}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]\right\}^{1/2}\to 0,
\end{align}
as $h\to 0$. Thus, along subsequence, we get 
\begin{align}
\lim_{h\to 0}\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}^h(s),\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s))=\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}(s),\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s)), \ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.}
\end{align}
\iffalse 
Next, for $\mathrm{G}_0=\mathrm{G}_0^1+\mathrm{G}_0^2$, where $\mathrm{G}_0^1\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{V}'))$ and $\mathrm{G}_0^2\in\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}(0,T;{\widetilde\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}))$, we have 
\begin{align}\label{361}
&\left|\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\langle\mathbf{u}(s),(\eta^h*1)(s)\mathrm{G}_0(s)\rangle\d s\right]-\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\langle\mathbf{u}(s),\mathrm{G}_0(s)\rangle\d s\right]\right|\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}|\langle\mathbf{u}(s),(\eta^h*1)(s)\mathrm{G}_0^1(s)-\mathrm{G}_0^1(s)\rangle|\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}|\langle\mathbf{u}(s),(\eta^h*1)(s)\mathrm{G}_0^2(s)-\mathrm{G}_0^2(s)\rangle|\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}|(\eta^h*1)(s)-1|\|\mathrm{G}_0^1(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{r+1}}|(\eta^h*1)(s)-1|\|\mathrm{G}_0^2(s)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right]\right\}^{1/2}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}|(\eta^h*1)(s)-1|^2\|\mathrm{G}_0^1(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2\d s\right]\right\}^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\quad+\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\right]\right\}^{\frac{1}{r+1}}\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}|(\eta^h*1)(s)-1|^{\frac{r+1}{r}}\|\mathrm{G}_0^2(s)\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}\d s\right]\right\}^{\frac{r}{r+1}}.
\end{align}
Let us now consider $|(\eta^h*1)(s)-1|$ and estimate it as 
\begin{align}
|(\eta^h*1)(s)-1|=\left|\int_0^{t_1}\eta^h(s-\tau)\d\tau-1\right|=\left|\int_{\frac{s-t_1}{h}}^{\frac{s}{h}}\eta(\tau)\d\tau-1\right|\to 0,
\end{align}
as $h\to 0$, since $0\leq s\leq t_1$. Thus, an application of the dominated convergence theorem in \eqref{361} yields the required convergence. Once again using Burkholder-Davis-Gundy and H\"older's inequalities, we obtain 
\begin{align}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t_1\in[0,T]}\left|\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}(s),(\eta^h*1)(s)\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s))-\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}(s),\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s))\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\|((\eta^h*1)(s)-1)\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\leq\left\{\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{s\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\right\}^{1/2}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T|(\eta^h*1)(s)-1|^2\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]\to 0, \ \text{ as } \ h\to 0,
\end{align}
using the dominated convergence theorem. Finally, we consider 
\begin{align}
&\left|\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\text{Tr}((\eta^h*1)(s)\Phi(s)\mathrm{Q}\Phi^*(s))\d s-\int_0^{t_1}\text{Tr}(\Phi(s)\mathrm{Q}\Phi^*(s))\d s\right]\right|\nonumber\\&\leq\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T|(\eta^h*1)(s)-1|\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]\to 0, \ \text{ as } \ h\to 0.
\end{align}
\fi 
Finally, using the fact that $\int_0^h\eta^h(s)\d s=\frac{1}{2}$, we estimate 
\begin{align}\label{3.64}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\left(\int_{\tau}^{t_1}\eta^h(t_1-s)\d s\right)\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau \right]\nonumber\\&= \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\eta^h(s)\int_0^{t_1-s}\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau\d s\right]\nonumber\\&= \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{h}\eta^h(s)\left(\int_0^{t_1}\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau-\int_{t_1-s}^{t_1}\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau\right)\d s\right]\nonumber\\&=\frac{1}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau\right]-\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{h}\eta^h(s)\int_{t_1-s}^{t_1}\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\to \frac{1}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t_1}\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau\right], \ \text{ as } \ h\to 0,
\end{align}
using the continuity of the integral in the final term.  Thus, along a subsequence, we further have 
\begin{align}\label{3p64}
\lim_{h\to 0}\int_0^{t_1}\left(\int_{\tau}^{t_1}\eta^h(t_1-s)\d s\right)\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau=\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{t_1}\|\Phi(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d\tau, \ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.}
\end{align}
Using the convergences \eqref{360}-\eqref{3p64} in \eqref{359}, along a subsequence, we get  
\begin{align}
&\int_0^{t_1}\langle\mathbf{u}(s),\mathrm{G}_0(s)\rangle\d s-\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}(s),\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s))-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{t_1}\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&=-\lim_{h\to 0}\langle\mathbf{u}(t_1),\mathbf{u}^h(t_1)\rangle +\lim_{h\to 0}\langle\mathbf{u}(0),\mathbf{u}^h(0)\rangle,\ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.}
\end{align}
It should be noted that 
\begin{align}
(\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t-s),\mathbf{v})=\int_{t-s}^t\langle\mathrm{G}_0(r),\mathbf{v}\rangle\d r+\int_{t-s}^t(\Phi(r)\d\mathrm{W}(r),\mathbf{v}), \ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.},
\end{align}
 and $\lim\limits_{s\uparrow 0}(\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t-s),\mathbf{v})=0$, $\mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.}$, for all $\mathbf{v}\in\widetilde\mathbb{L}^{r+1}\cap\mathbb{V}$. Using the fact that $\mathbf{u}$ is $\mathrm{L}^2$-weakly continuous in time and $\int_0^h\eta^h(s)\d s=\frac{1}{2}$, we get 
\begin{align}
(\mathbf{u}(t_1),\mathbf{u}^h(t_1))&=\int_0^{t_1}\eta^h(s)(\mathbf{u}(t_1),\mathbf{u}(t_1-s))\d s\nonumber\\&=\frac{1}{2}\|\mathbf{u}(t_1)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\int_0^h\eta^h(s)(\mathbf{u}(t_1),\mathbf{u}(t_1-s)-\mathbf{u}(t_1))\d s\to \frac{1}{2}\|\mathbf{u}(t_1)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
\end{align}
as $h\to 0$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. Similarly, we obtain 
\begin{align}
(\mathbf{u}(0),\mathbf{u}^h(0))\to\frac{1}{2}\|\mathbf{u}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\ \text{ as } \ h\to 0, \ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.}
\end{align}
Combining the above convergences, we finally obtain the energy equality 
\begin{align}
\|\mathbf{u}(t_1)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=\|\mathbf{u}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\int_0^{t_1}\langle\mathrm{G}_0(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s+2\int_0^{t_1}(\mathbf{u}(s),\Phi(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s))\nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^{t_1}\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s,
\end{align}
for all $t_1\in(0,T)$. 






Taking expectation and noting the fact that the final term in the right hand side of the equality \eqref{345} is a martingale, we find 
\begin{align}
\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]&=\mathbb{E}\left[\|{\mathbf{u}_0}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]-2\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\langle{\mathrm{G}_0}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d s\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right].
\end{align}
Thus an application of It\^o's formula to the process $e^{-2\eta t}\|\mathbf{u}(\cdot)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$ yields 
	\begin{align}\label{4.45}
	\mathbb{E}\left[e^{-2\eta t}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]&=\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]-\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^te^{-2\eta s}\langle 2\mathrm{G}_0(s)+2\eta \mathbf{u}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\rangle\d
	s\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t
	e^{-2\eta s}\|\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right],
	\end{align}
	for all $t\in[0,T]$. Note that the initial value
	$\mathbf{u}^n(0)$ converges to $\mathbf{u}_0$ strongly in $\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{H})$, that is,
	\begin{align}\label{4.46}
	\lim_{n\to\infty}\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)-\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]=0.
	\end{align}
	
	
	\noindent\textbf{Step (5):} \emph{Minty-Browder
		technique and global strong solution.} It is now left to show that $$\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}(\cdot))=\mathrm{G}_0(\cdot)\ \text{ and }\ 
	\Phi(\cdot,\mathbf{u}(\cdot))=\Phi(\cdot).$$ In order to do this, we make use of the Lemma \ref{lem3.6}.  For
	$\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H}_m))$ with $m<n$, using the local monotonicity result (see (\ref{3.11y})),	we get 
	\begin{align}\label{4.48}
	&\mathbb{E}\bigg[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}(2\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t))-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t)),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}^n(t)\rangle
	+2\eta \left(\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}^n(t)\right))\d
	t\bigg]\nonumber\\&\geq \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\|\Phi^n(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t)) - \Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right].
	\end{align}
Rearranging the terms in \eqref{4.48} and then using energy	equality (\ref{4.39}), we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{4.49}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle 2\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t))+2\eta \mathbf{v}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}^n(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\quad-\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\|\Phi^n(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}
	\d
	t\right]+2\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\left(\Phi^n(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t)),
	\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\right)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\geq
	\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle 2\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t))+2\eta \mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\quad-\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle 2\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t))+2\eta \mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{u}^n(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\|
	\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&=\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle 2\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}^n(t))+2\eta \mathbf{u}^n(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]
	+\mathbb{E}\left[e^{-2\eta T}\|\mathbf{u}^n(T)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right].
	\end{align}
	Let us now discuss the convergence of the terms involving noise co-efficient. Note that \begin{align}\label{eqn49z}
	&\mathbb{E}\Bigg[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}(2\left(\Phi^n(t, \mathbf{v}(t)),
	\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\right)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}-\|\Phi^n(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}})\d
	t\Bigg]\nonumber\\& = \mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}2\left(\Phi(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t)),
	\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\right)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+
	\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}2\left(\Phi^n(t, \mathbf{v}(t))-\Phi(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t)),
	\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\right)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\quad
	-\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\|\Phi^n(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq
	\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}2\left(\Phi(t, \mathbf{v}(t)),
	\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\right)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+2C
	\left(\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-4\eta t}\left\|\Phi^n(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))-\Phi(t, \mathbf{v}(t))\right\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right]\right)^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\quad
	-\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\|\Phi^n(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d t\right],
	\end{align}
	where $C=
	{\left(\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-4\eta t}\left\|\Phi^n(t,
		\mathbf{u}^n(t))\right\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
		t\right]\right)^{1/2}}$. Then, applying the weak convergence of $\{\Phi^n(\cdot,\mathbf{u}^n(\cdot)):n\in\mathbb{N}\}$  given in 
	(\ref{4.43z}) 
	to the first term and using the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem to
	the second and final terms on the right hand side of the inequality
	(\ref{eqn49z}), we deduce that 
	\begin{align}\label{4.50}
	&\mathbb{E}\Bigg[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}(2\left(\Phi^n(t, \mathbf{v}(t)),
	\Phi^n(t,\mathbf{u}^n(t))\right)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}-\|\Phi^n(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}})\d
	t\Bigg]\nonumber\\& \to
	\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}(2(\Phi(t, \mathbf{v}(t)),
	\Phi(t))_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}-\|\Phi(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}})\d t\right],
	\end{align}
	as $n\to\infty$. Taking liminf on both sides of (\ref{4.49}),
	and using (\ref{4.50}), we obtain
	\begin{align}\label{4.51}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle 2\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t))+2\eta \mathbf{v}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\quad-\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\|\Phi(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}} \d
	t\right]+2\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\left(\Phi(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t)), \Phi(t)\right)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\geq\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle 2\mathrm{G}_0(t)+2\eta \mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]
	+\liminf_{n\to\infty}\mathbb{E}\left[e^{-2\eta T}\|\mathbf{u}^n(T)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right].
	\end{align}
	Making use of the lower semicontinuity property of the $\mathbb{H}$-norm and the strong convergence given in
	(\ref{4.46}), the second term on the right hand side of the
	inequality (\ref{4.51}) satisfies:
	\begin{align}\label{4.52}
	&\liminf_{n\to\infty}\mathbb{E}\left[e^{-2\eta T}\|\mathbf{u}^n(T)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\|\mathbf{u}^n(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\geq
	\mathbb{E}\left[e^{-2\eta T}\|\mathbf{u}(T)\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}-\|\mathbf{u}_0\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}\right].
	\end{align}
	We use of the energy equality (\ref{4.45}) and (\ref{4.52}) in
	(\ref{4.51}) to have  
	\begin{align}\label{4.53}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle 2\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t))+2\eta \mathbf{v}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\geq\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\|\Phi(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}} \d
	t\right]-2\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\left(\Phi(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t)), \Phi(t)\right)_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\|\Phi(t)\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d t\right]
	+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle2\mathrm{G}_0(t)+\eta \mathbf{u}(t),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle\d
	t\right].
	\end{align}
	Rearranging the terms in (\ref{4.53}), we obtain
	\begin{align}\label{4.54}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle 2\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t))-2\mathrm{G}_0(t)+2\eta (\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t)),\mathbf{v}(t)-\mathbf{u}(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]\nonumber\\&\geq
	\mathbb{E}\Bigg[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\|\Phi(t,
	\mathbf{v}(t))-\Phi(t)\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}
	\d t\Bigg]\geq 0.
	\end{align}
	Note that the estimate (\ref{4.54}) holds true for any	$\mathbf{v}\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H}_m))$ and for any
	$m\in\mathbb{N}$, since the estimate is independent of
	$m$ and $n$. Using a density argument, the
	inequality (\ref{4.54}) remains true for any
\begin{align*}\mathbf{v}&\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}))\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}))=:\mathcal{G}.\end{align*} 
	Indeed, for any $\mathbf{v}\in\mathcal{G}$,
	there exists a strongly convergent subsequence
	$\mathbf{v}_m\in\mathcal{G}$, which satisfies the
	inequality (\ref{4.54}).
	Taking $\mathbf{v}(\cdot)=\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ in (\ref{4.54}) immediately gives
	$\Phi(\cdot,\mathbf{v}(\cdot))=\Phi(\cdot)$. Next, we take
	$\mathbf{v}(\cdot)=\mathbf{u}(\cdot)+\lambda\mathbf{w}(\cdot)$, $\lambda>0$, where
	$\mathbf{w}\in\mathcal{G},$ and substitute for
	$\mathbf{v}$ in (\ref{4.54}) to find
	\begin{align}\label{4.55}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle \mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}(t)+\lambda\mathbf{w}(t))-\mathrm{G}_0(t)+\eta \lambda\mathbf{w}(t),\lambda\mathbf{w}(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]\geq 0.
	\end{align}
	Dividing the above inequality by $\lambda$,  using the hemicontinuity property of
	$\mathrm{G}(\cdot)$ (see Lemma \ref{lem2.8}), and passing $\lambda\to 0$, we obtain
	\begin{align}\label{4.56}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}e^{-2\eta t}\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{G}_0(t),\mathbf{w}(t)\rangle\d
	t\right]\geq 0,
	\end{align}
	since the final term in (\ref{4.55}) tends to $0$ as $\lambda\to0$.
	Thus from (\ref{4.56}), we get  $\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}(t))=\mathrm{G}_0(t)$ and hence $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is a strong solution of the
	system (\ref{32}) and
	$\mathbf{u}\in\mathcal{G}$. From \eqref{345}, it is immediate that $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ satisfy the following energy equality (It\^o's formula): 
	\begin{align}\label{3.63}
&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\nonumber\\&=\|{\mathbf{u}_0}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\int_0^t\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s+2\int_0^t(\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)),
	\end{align}
for all $t\in(0,T)$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. 	Moreover, the following energy estimate holds true: 
		\begin{align}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+4\mu \int_0^{T}\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t+4\beta\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \left(2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+14KT\right)e^{28KT}. \label{eng1}
	\end{align}
	Furthermore, since $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ satisfies the energy equality \eqref{3.63}, one can show  that the $\mathscr{F}_t$-adapted paths of $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ are continuous with trajectories in  $\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{H})$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. (see \cite{GK1,Me,GK2}, etc).
	
	
	\vskip 0.2cm 
	\noindent\textbf{Step (6):} \emph{Uniqueness.} Finally, we show that the strong solution established in step (5) is unique. Let $\mathbf{u}_1(\cdot)$ and $\mathbf{u}_2(\cdot)$ be two strong solutions of the system (\ref{32}). For $N>0$, let us define 
	\begin{align*}
	\tau_N^1&=\inf_{0\leq t\leq T}\Big\{t:\|\mathbf{u}_1(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\geq N\Big\},\ \tau_N^2=\inf_{0\leq t\leq T}\Big\{t:\|\mathbf{u}_2(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\geq N\Big\}\text{ and }\tau_N:=\tau_N^1\wedge\tau_N^2.
	\end{align*}
	Using the energy estimate \eqref{eng1}, it can  be shown in a similar way as in step (1), Proposition \ref{prop1} that $\tau_N\to T$ as $N\to\infty$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. Let us define $\mathbf{w}(\cdot):=\mathbf{u}_1(\cdot)-\mathbf{u}_2(\cdot)$ and $\widetilde{\Phi}(\cdot):=\Phi(\cdot,\mathbf{u}_1(\cdot))-\Phi(\cdot,\mathbf{u}_2(\cdot))$. Then, $\mathbf{w}(\cdot)$ satisfies the following system:
	\begin{equation}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\d\mathbf{w}(t)&=-\left[\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{w}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_1(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_2(t))+\beta(\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_1(t))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_2(t)))\right]\d t+\widetilde{\Phi}(t)\d\mathrm{W}(t),\\
	\mathbf{w}(0)&=\mathbf{w}_0.
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
Then, $\mathbf{w}(\cdot)$ satisfies the following energy equality: 
	\begin{align}\label{4.59}
	&\|\mathbf{w}(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&=\|\mathbf{w}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2 -2\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_1(s))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_2(s)),\mathbf{w}(s)\rangle\d s\nonumber\\&\quad-2\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_1(s))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_2(s)),\mathbf{u}_1(s)-\mathbf{u}_2(s)\rangle\d s+\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\widetilde\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+2\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}(\widetilde{\Phi}(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{w}(s)).
	\end{align}
	From (\ref{2.30}), we obtain 
	\begin{align*}
	|\langle \mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_1)-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_2),\mathbf{w}\rangle|\leq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\frac{\beta}{2}\||\mathbf{u}_2|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}\mathbf{w}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\eta\|\mathbf{w}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
	\end{align*}
	and from \eqref{2.27}, we get 
	\begin{align*}
\beta	\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_1)-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_2),\mathbf{w}\rangle\geq \frac{\beta}{2}\||\mathbf{u}_2|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}\mathbf{w}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
	\end{align*}
	Thus, using the above two estimates in   (\ref{4.59}), we infer that 
	\begin{align}\label{4.60}
	&\|\mathbf{w}(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\|\mathbf{w}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2 +2\eta\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s +\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\widetilde{\Phi}(s)\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
	s +2\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}(\widetilde{\Phi}(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{w}(s)).
	\end{align}
	It should be noted that the final term in the right hand side of the inequality (\ref{4.60}) is a local martingale. Taking expectation in (\ref{4.60}), and  then using the Hypothesis \ref{hyp} (H.2), we obtain  
	\begin{align}\label{4.62}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{w}(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right]\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{w}(0)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+(L+2\eta)\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right].
	\end{align}
	Applying  Gronwall's inequality in (\ref{4.62}),  we arrive at 
	\begin{align}\label{4.63}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{w}(t\wedge\tau_N)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{w}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]e^{(L+2\eta)T}.
	\end{align}
	Thus the initial data  $\mathbf{u}_1(0)=\mathbf{u}_2(0)=\mathbf{u}_0$ leads to $\mathbf{w}(t\wedge\tau_N)=0$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. But using the fact that $\tau_N\to T$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s., implies $\mathbf{w}(t)=0$ and hence $\mathbf{u}_1(t) = \mathbf{u}_2(t)$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s., for all $t \in[0, T ]$,  and hence the uniqueness follows.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
	Recently authors in \cite{GK2} (Theorem 1) obtained It\^o's formula for processes taking values in intersection of finitely many Banach spaces. But it seems to the author that this result may not applicable in our context for establishing the energy equality \eqref{3.63}, as our operator $\mathrm{B}(\cdot):\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}\to\mathbb{V}'+\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{\frac{r+1}{r}}$ (see \eqref{212}) and one can show the local integrability in the sum of Banach spaces only. 
\end{remark}
\begin{theorem}\label{exis1}
For $r=3$ and $2\beta\mu \geq 1$,	let $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{H})$ be given.  Then there exists a \emph{pathwise unique strong solution}
	$\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to the system (\ref{32}) such that \begin{align*}\mathbf{u}&\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{H})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathbb{V}))\cap\mathrm{L}^{4}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{4}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{4})),\end{align*} with $\mathbb{P}$-a.s., continuous trajectories in $\mathbb{H}$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	A proof of the Theorem \ref{exis1} follows similarly as in the Theorem \ref{exis}, by using the global monotonicity result \eqref{218} and the fact that 
	\begin{align}
	&\int_0^T\langle\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{G}(\mathbf{v}(t)),\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\rangle +\frac{L}{2}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\nonumber\\&\geq \frac{1}{2}\int_0^T\|\Phi(t, \mathbf{u}(t)) - \Phi(t,	\mathbf{v}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d t,
	\end{align}
	for $2\beta\mu \geq 1$. Uniqueness also follows easily by using the estimate \eqref{232}.
\end{proof}
\subsection{Regularity of strong solution}
In order to get the regularity results of the strong solution to \eqref{32}, we restrict ourselves to periodic domains with $\int_{\mathcal{O}}\mathbf{u}(x)\d x=0$. The main difficulty in working with bounded domains is that $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}(|\mathbf{u}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u})$ need not be zero on the boundary, and $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}$ and $-\Delta$ are not necessarily commuting (see \cite{JCR4}). Thus applying It\^o's formula for the process $\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(\cdot)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$ may not work. Moreover, $\Delta\mathbf{u}\big|_{\partial\mathcal{O}}\neq 0$ in general and the term with pressure will not disappear (see \cite{KT2}) and hence applying It\^o's formula for the stochastic process $\|\nabla\mathbf{u}(\cdot)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$ (for $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ appearing in \eqref{31}) also may not work. In a periodic domain or in whole space $\mathbb{R}^n,$ the operators $\mathrm{P}_{\mathbb{H}}$ and $-\Delta$ commute and we have the following result (see Lemma 2.1, \cite{KWH}): 
\begin{align}\label{370}
0\leq\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\d x\leq\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}(x)\cdot\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(x)\d x\leq r\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\d x.
\end{align}
Using Lemma 2.2,  \cite{KWH}, we further have 
\begin{align}\label{371}
\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{3(r+1)}}^{r+1}\leq C\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}\d x, \ \text{ for }\ r\geq 1.
\end{align}
Note that the estimate \eqref{370} is true even in bounded domains (with Dirichlet boundary conditions) if one replaces $\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}$ with $-\Delta\mathbf{u}$ and \eqref{371} holds true in bounded domains as well as whole space $\mathbb{R}^n$. We also assume that the noise coefficient satisfies the following: 
\begin{hypothesis}\label{hyp2}
	There exist a positive
	constant $\widetilde{K}$ such that for all $t\in[0,T]$ and $\mathbf{u}\in\mathbb{V}$, 
	\begin{equation*}
	\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(t, \mathbf{u})\|^{2}_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}} 
	\leq \widetilde{K}\left(1 +\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^{2}\right).
	\end{equation*}
\end{hypothesis}
\begin{theorem}\label{thm3.10}
	Let $\mathbf{u}_0\in \mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{V})$ be given.  Then, for $r>3$, the pathwise unique strong solution	$\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ to the system (\ref{32}) satisfies the following regularity:  \begin{align*}\mathbf{u}&\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A})))\cap\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{3(r+1)})),\end{align*} with $\mathbb{P}$-a.s., continuous trajectories in $\mathbb{V}$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let us take $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{V}),$  to obtain the further regularity results of the strong solution to \eqref{32} with $r\geq 3$. Applying the infinite dimensional It\^o formula to the process $\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(\cdot)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$, we get 
	\begin{align}\label{362}
&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+2\mu \int_0^t\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&=\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2-2\int_0^t(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(s)),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s))\d s	-2\beta\int_0^t(\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(s)),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s))\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+\int_0^{t}\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
s +2\int_0^{t}\left(\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(s)\right).
	\end{align}
	We estimate $|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(s)),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(s))|$ using H\"older's, and Young's inequalities as 
	\begin{align}\label{3.73}
	|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|&\leq\||\mathbf{u}||\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{\mu}{2}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{2\mu }\||\mathbf{u}||\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2. 
	\end{align}
	For $r>3$, we  estimate the final term from \eqref{3.73} using H\"older's and Young's inequalities as 
	\begin{align*}
	&	\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\nonumber\\&=\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^2|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^{\frac{4}{r-1}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^{\frac{2(r-3)}{r-1}}\d x\nonumber\\&\leq\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\right)^{\frac{2}{r-1}}\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\right)^{\frac{r-3}{r-1}}\nonumber\\&\leq{\beta\mu }\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\mathbf{u}(x)|^{r-1}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\right)+\frac{r-3}{r-1}\left(\frac{2}{\beta\mu (r-1)}\right)^{\frac{2}{r-3}}\left(\int_{\mathcal{O}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(x)|^2\d x\right).
	\end{align*}
Making use of the estimate \eqref{370} in \eqref{3.73}, taking supreumum over time from $0$ to $t$ and then taking  expectation, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{363}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\mu \int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+\beta\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\right]+2\eta\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right]+\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
t\right] \nonumber\\&\quad+2\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\left|\int_0^{t}\left(\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(s)\right)\right|\right],
\end{align}
where $\eta$ is defined in \eqref{215}.
Applying Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality to the final term appearing in the inequality \eqref{363}, we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{364}
&2\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\left|\int_0^{t}\left(\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(s)\right)\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\leq 2\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}\left(\int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right)^{1/2}\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{1}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+6\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d t\right].
\end{align}
Substituting \eqref{364} in \eqref{363}, we find
\begin{align}\label{365}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+2\mu \int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+2\beta\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\right]+4\eta\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right]+14\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}\|\mathrm{A}^{1/2}\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\right]+4\eta\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d t\right]+14\widetilde{K}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}(1+\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2)\d
t\right],
\end{align}
where we used Hypothesis \ref{hyp}. 
Applying Gronwall's inequality in \eqref{365}, we obtain 
\begin{align}\label{366}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\right]\leq \left\{2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\right]+14\widetilde{K}T\right\}e^{(4\eta+14\widetilde{K})T}.
\end{align}
Using \eqref{366} in \eqref{365}, we finally get 
\begin{align}\label{367}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+2\mu \int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+2\beta\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)|^{\frac{r-1}{2}}|\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\left\{2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\right]+14\widetilde{K}T\right\}e^{4(2\eta+7\widetilde{K})T},
\end{align}
which competes the proof for $r>3$. 


For $r=3$, we estimate $|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|$ as 
\begin{align}\label{2.91}
|(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}),\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u})|&\leq\|(\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{1}{4\theta}\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\theta\||\mathbf{u}||\nabla\mathbf{u}|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2.
\end{align}
A calculation similar to \eqref{365} gives 
\begin{align}\label{2.92}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+2\left(\mu-\frac{1}{2\theta}\right) \int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+4(\beta-\theta)\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)||\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\right]+14\widetilde{K}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{T}(1+\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2)\d
t\right],
\end{align} 
For $2\beta\mu \geq 1$,  it is immediate that 
\begin{align}\label{2p94}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{t\in[0,T]}	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+2\left(\mu-\frac{1}{2\theta}\right)\int_0^T\|\mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t+4(\beta-\theta)\int_0^T\||\mathbf{u}(t)||\nabla\mathbf{u}(t)|\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d t\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\left\{2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\right]+14\widetilde{K}T\right\}e^{28\widetilde{K}T}.
\end{align}
Hence $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{\infty}(0,T;\mathbb{V})\cap\mathrm{L}^2(0,T;\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{A})))$ and using the estimate \eqref{371}, we also get $\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(\Omega;\mathrm{L}^{r+1}(0,T;\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{3(r+1)}))$.  Moreover, the $\mathscr{F}_t$-adapted paths of $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ are continuous with trajectories in  $\mathrm{C}([0,T];\mathbb{V})$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s.
	\end{proof}




\section{Stationary solutions and stability}\label{se5}\setcounter{equation}{0}
In this section, we consider the stationary system (in the deterministic sense) corresponding to the convective Brinkman-Forchheimer  equations. We show the existence and uniqueness of weak solutions to the steady state equations and discuss about exponential stability as well as stabilization by noise results. 
\subsection{Existence and uniqueness of weak solutions to the stationary system} 
Let us consider the following stationary system: 
\begin{equation}\label{3pp1}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
-\mu \Delta\mathbf{u}_{\infty}+(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u}_{\infty}+\beta|\mathbf{u}_{\infty}|^{r-1}\mathbf{u}_{\infty}+\nabla p_{\infty}&=\mathbf{f}, \ \text{ in } \ \mathcal{O}, \\ \nabla\cdot\mathbf{u}_{\infty}&=0, \ \text{ in } \ \mathcal{O}, \\
\mathbf{u}_{\infty}&=\mathbf{0}\ \text{ on } \ \partial\mathcal{O}.
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
Taking the Helmholtz-Hodge orthogonal projection onto the system \eqref{3pp1}, we can write down the abstract formulation of the system \eqref{3pp1} as 
\begin{align}\label{3pp2}
\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}_{\infty}+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty})+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty})=\mathbf{f} \ \text{ in }\ \mathbb{V}'.
\end{align}
We show that there exists a unique weak solution of the system \eqref{3pp2} in  $\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$, for $r\geq 3$. 
Given any $\mathbf{f}\in\mathbb{V}'$, our problem is to find $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$ such that 
\begin{align}\label{3pp3}
\mu (\nabla\mathbf{u}_{\infty},\nabla\mathbf{v})+\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}),\mathbf{v}\rangle+\beta\langle \mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}),\mathbf{v}\rangle=\langle \mathbf{f},\mathbf{v}\rangle, \ \text{ for all }\ \mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}\cap\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}, 
\end{align}
is satisfied. Our next aim is to discuss about the existence and uniqueness of weak solutions of the system \eqref{3pp1}. 
\begin{theorem}\label{thm6.1}
	For every $\mathbf{f}\in\mathbb{V}'$ and $r\geq 1$, there exists at least one weak solution of the system \eqref{3pp1}. For $r>3$, if 
	\begin{align}\label{8pp5}
	\mu>\frac{2\eta}{\uplambda_1},
	\end{align}
where $\eta$ is defined in \eqref{215}, 	then the solution of \eqref{3pp2} is unique. For $r=3$, the condition given in \eqref{8pp5} becomes $\mu\geq \frac{1}{2\beta}$. 
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	(i) We show the existence of weak solution to \eqref{3pp1} (equivalently the existence of \eqref{3pp2}) by applying  a Faedo-Galerkin approximation technique. Let $\{e_k\}$ be eigenfunctions of the Stokes operator defined in the previous section. 
	For a fixed positive integer $m$, we look for a function $\mathbf{u}_m\in\mathbb{V}$ of the form \begin{align}\label{8p4}
	\mathbf{u}_{\infty}^m=\sum_{k=1}^m\xi_m^ke_k,\ \xi_m^k\in\mathbb{R},\end{align} and 
	\begin{align}\label{8p5}
	\mu (\nabla\mathbf{u}_{\infty}^m,\nabla e_k)+(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}^m),e_k)+\beta( \mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}^m),e_k)=( \mathbf{f},e_k),
	\end{align}
	for   $k=1,\ldots,m$. Equivalently, the equation \eqref{8p5} can also be written as 
	\begin{align}
	\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}_{\infty}^m+ \mathrm{P}_m\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}^m)+\beta \mathrm{P}_m\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}^m)=\mathrm{P}_m\mathbf{f}. 
	\end{align}
	Note that the equations \eqref{8p4}-\eqref{8p5} are system of nonlinear equations for $\xi_m^1,\ldots,\xi_m^m$ and the existence of solutions is proved in the following way. 
	We use Lemma 1.4, Chapter 2, \cite{Te} to obtain the existence of solution to the system of equations \eqref{8p4}-\eqref{8p5}. We 
	take $\mathrm{W}=\text{Span}\left\{e_1,\ldots,e_m\right\}$ and the scalar product on $\mathrm{W}$ is the scalar product $[\cdot,\cdot]=(\nabla\cdot,\nabla\cdot)$ induced by $\mathbb{V}$ and $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{P}_m$ is defined by 
	\begin{align}
	[\mathrm{P}_m(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v}]=(\nabla\mathrm{P}_m(\mathbf{u}),\nabla\mathbf{v})=\mu (\nabla\mathbf{u},\nabla\mathbf{v})+ b(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v})+\beta (\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{v})-(\mathbf{f},\mathbf{v}),
	\end{align}
	for all $\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v}\in \mathrm{W}$. The continuity of the mapping $\mathrm{P}_m:\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{W}$ is easy to verify, as in finite dimensional space all norms are equivalent.  In order to apply Lemma 1.4, Chapter 2, \cite{Te}, we need to establish that $$[\mathrm{P}_m(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{u}]>0, \ \text{ for } \ [\mathbf{u}]=k>0,$$ where $[\cdot]$ denotes the norm on $\mathrm{W}$. Note that it is the norm induced by $\mathbb{V}$. Next, we consider 
	\begin{align}
	[\mathrm{P}_m(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{u}]&=\mu \|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\beta\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}-(\mathbf{f},\mathbf{u})\geq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\frac{1}{2\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2,
	\end{align}
	where we used Cauchy-Schwarz and Young's inequalities. 
	It follows that $[\mathrm{P}_m(\mathbf{u}),\mathbf{u}]>0$ for $\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}=k$ and $k$ is sufficiently large, more precisely $k>\frac{1}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}.$ Hence, the hypotheses of Lemma 1.4, Chapter 2, \cite{Te} are satisfied and a solution $\mathbf{u}_m$  of \eqref{8p5} exists. 
\iffalse 
From page 529 of \cite{Evans}, we know that a continuous function $\varphi:\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^m$ satisfies $\varphi(x)\cdot x\geq 0$ if $|x|=r$, for some $r>0$. Then, there exists a point $x\in\mathrm{B}(0,r)$ such that $\varphi(x)=0$, where $\mathrm{B}(0,r)$ is closed ball in $\mathbb{R}^m$ with center $0$ and radius $r$. 

	Using this, we show that for each integer $m=1,2,\ldots$, there exists a function $\mathbf{u}^m_{\infty}$ of the form \eqref{8p4} satisfying the identities \eqref{8p5}. Let us define a continuous function $\varphi:\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^m$, $\varphi=(\varphi_1,\ldots,\varphi_m)$ by setting 
	\begin{align}
\varphi^j(\xi):=\mu\int_{\mathcal{O}}\left[\left(\sum_{k=1}^m\xi_k\nabla e_k\right)\cdot\nabla e_k\right]\d x
	\end{align}
	for each point $\xi=(\xi_,\ldots,\xi_m)\in\mathbb{R}^m$.
	\fi 
	
	Multiplying \eqref{8p5} by $\xi_m^k$ and then adding from $k=1,\ldots,m$, we find 
	\begin{align}\label{8.9}
	&\mu \|\nabla\mathbf{u}_m\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\beta\|\mathbf{u}_m\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}=(\mathrm{P}_m\mathbf{f},\mathbf{u}_m)\leq\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}_m\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\nabla\mathbf{u}_m\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\frac{1}{2\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2,
	\end{align}
	where we used H\"older's and Young's inequalities. From \eqref{8.9}, we deduce that 
	\begin{align}
	\mu \|\nabla\mathbf{u}_m\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\beta\|\mathbf{u}_m\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\leq\frac{1}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2.
	\end{align}
	Thus, we get  $\|\mathbf{u}_m\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2$ is bounded uniformly and independent of $m$. Since $\mathbb{V}$ and $\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}$ reflexive, using the Banach-Alaoglu theorem, we can extract a subsequence $\{\mathbf{u}_{m_k}\}$ of $\{\mathbf{u}_m\}$ such that 
	\begin{align}
	\mathbf{u}_{m_k}&\xrightarrow{w} \mathbf{u}_{\infty}, \ \text{ in }\ \mathbb{V},\\
	\mathbf{u}_{m_k}&\xrightarrow{w} \mathbf{u}_{\infty} \ \text{ in }\ \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1},
	\end{align}
as $k\to\infty$.	Since the embedding of $\mathbb{V}\subset\mathbb{H}$ is compact, one can extract a subsequence $\{\mathbf{u}_{m_{k_j}}\}$ of $\{\mathbf{u}_{m_k}\}$ such that 
	\begin{align}
	\mathbf{u}_{m_{k_j}}\to \mathbf{u}_{\infty}, \ \text{ in }\ \mathbb{H}, \ \text{ a.e.} \ x\in\mathcal{O},
	\end{align}
as $j\to\infty$.	Passing to limit in \eqref{8p5} along the subsequence $\{m_{k_j}\}$, we find that $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ is a solution to \eqref{3pp3} and $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ satisfies 
	\begin{align}\label{8.14}
	\mu 	\|\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+2\beta\|\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\leq\frac{1}{\mu }\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}^2,
	\end{align}
	for $r\geq 1$. 
	
	
	(iii) Let us now establish the uniqueness for $r>3$.  We take $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ and $\mathbf{v}_{\infty}$ as two weak solutions of the system \eqref{3pp3}. We define $\mathbf{w}_{\infty}:=\mathbf{u}_{\infty}-\mathbf{v}_{\infty}$. Then $\mathbf{w}_{\infty}$ satisfies:
	\begin{align}\label{8p17}
	\mu (\nabla\mathbf{w}_{\infty},\nabla\mathbf{v})+\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty})-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}_{\infty}),\mathbf{v}\rangle+\beta\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty})-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{v}_{\infty}),\mathbf{v}\rangle=0,
	\end{align}
	for all $\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{V}$. Taking $\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{w}_{\infty}$ in \eqref{8p17}, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{8p18}
	\mu \|\nabla\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=-\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty})-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}_{\infty}),\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\rangle-\beta\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty})-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{v}_{\infty}),\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\rangle\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{\mu}{2}\|\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\eta\|\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
	\end{align}
	where we used \eqref{2.27} and \eqref{2.30}. 
	Using \eqref{8p18} in \eqref{8p18}, we  get 
	\begin{align}\label{8.19}
	\left(\frac{\mu }{2}-\frac{\eta}{\uplambda_1}\right)\|\nabla\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\leq 0.
	\end{align}
and for $\mu>\frac{2\eta}{\uplambda_1}$,  we have $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}=\mathbf{v}_{\infty}$, for a.e. $x\in\mathcal{O}$. For $r=3$ and $2\beta\mu\geq 1$, one can use the estimate \eqref{232} to obtain the uniqueness. 
	\end{proof} 
\begin{remark}
We can get uniqueness for $r\geq 1$ also. For $n\leq 4$, we know that $\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^4}\leq C\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}$, by using Sobolev inequality.	One can estimate $-\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{w}_{\infty},\mathbf{v}_{\infty}),\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\rangle$ using H\"older's, and Sobolev's inequalities as 
	\begin{align}\label{6.49}
	-\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{w}_{\infty},\mathbf{v}_{\infty}),\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\rangle&\leq\|\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\|_{\widetilde\mathbb{L}^4}^2\|\mathbf{v}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\leq C\|\mathbf{v}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\|\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2.
	\end{align}
	Using \eqref{6.49} and \eqref{2pp11} in \eqref{8p18}, we  get 
	\begin{align}\label{819}
	\left(\mu-C\|\mathbf{v}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}\right)\|\nabla\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\leq 0.
	\end{align}
	Since $\mathbf{v}_{\infty}$ satisfies \eqref{8.14}, from \eqref{819}, we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{8.22}
	\left(\mu -\frac{C}{\mu}\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}\right)\|\nabla\mathbf{w}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\leq 0.
	\end{align}
	If the condition $\mu>C\sqrt{\|\mathbf{f}\|_{\mathbb{V}'}}$ is satisfied, then we have $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}=\mathbf{v}_{\infty}$. 
\end{remark}

\subsection{Exponential stability} Let us now discuss about the exponential stability of the stationary solution obtained in Theorem \ref{thm6.1}. Let us first discuss about the deterministic case. 
\begin{definition}
	A weak solution\footnote{For $r\geq 3,$ the existence and uniqueness of weak solutions can be obtained from \cite{SNA,KT2,CLF}, etc} $\mathbf{u}(t)$ of the system  of the deterministic system 
	\begin{equation}\label{4p22}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\frac{\d\mathbf{u}(t)}{\d t}+\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))&=\mathbf{f},\\
	\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0,
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}converges to $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ is \emph{exponentially stable in $\mathbb{H}$} if there exist a positive number $\kappa > 0$, such that
	\begin{align*}
	\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq \|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}e^{-\kappa t},\ t\geq 0.
	\end{align*}
	In particular, if $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ is a stationary solution of system (\ref{3pp2}), then $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ is called \emph{exponentially stable in $\mathbb{H}$} provided that any weak solution to (\ref{4p22}) converges to $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ at the same exponential rate $\kappa> 0$.
\end{definition}
\begin{theorem}
	Let $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ be the unique solution of the system (\ref{3pp2}). If $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is any weak  solution to the system \eqref{4p22}
	with $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbf{f}\in\mathbb{V}'$ arbitrary, then we have $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ is exponentially stable in $\mathbb{H}$ and $
	\mathbf{u}(t)\to \mathbf{u}_{\infty}\ \text{ in }\ \mathbb{H}\text{ as }\  t\to\infty,
	$
	for
	$\mu>\frac{2\eta}{\uplambda_1}$, for $r>3$ and $\mu\geq \frac{1}{2\beta},$ for $r=3$. 
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof} 
	Let us define $\mathbf{w}=\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$, so that $\mathbf{w}$ satisfies the following system: 
	\begin{equation}\label{8.26}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\frac{\d\mathbf{w}(t)}{\d t}+\mu  \mathrm{A}\mathbf{w}(t)+\beta (\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}))+\beta (\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}))&=0, \ t\in(0,T),\\
	\mathbf{w}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}.
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{equation}
	Taking inner product with $\mathbf{w}(\cdot)$ to the first equation in \eqref{8.26}, we find 
	\begin{align}\label{8.27}
	&\frac{1}{2}\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu \|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\nonumber\\&=-\beta\langle (\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty})),\mathbf{w}(t)\rangle -\beta\langle(\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty})),
	\mathbf{w}(t)\rangle\nonumber\\&\leq\frac{\mu }{2}\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2+\eta\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,
	\end{align}
	for $r>3$,	where we used \eqref{2.27} and \eqref{2.30}. Thus, it is immediate that 
	\begin{align}
	&\frac{\d}{\d t}\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+(\uplambda_1\mu -2\eta)\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq 0. 
	\end{align}
	Thus, an application of variation of constants formula yields 
	\begin{align}
	\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq e^{-\kappa t}\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2, 
	\end{align}
	where $\kappa=(\uplambda_1\mu -2\eta)>0$, for $\mu>\frac{2\eta}{\uplambda_1}$ and the exponential stability of $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ follows. For $r=3$ and $\mu\geq\frac{1}{2\beta}$ one can use the estimates \eqref{231} and \eqref{232} to get the required result. 
\end{proof} 
Now we discuss about the exponential stability results in  the stochastic case. 
\begin{definition}
	A strong solution $\mathbf{u}(t)$ of the system (\ref{32}) converges to $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\in\mathbb{H}$ is \emph{exponentially stable in mean square} if there exist two positive numbers $a > 0$, such that
	\begin{align*}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]e^{-at},\ t\geq 0.
	\end{align*}
	In particular, if $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ is a stationary solution of system (\ref{3pp1}), then $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ is called \emph{exponentially stable in the mean square} provided that any strong solution to (\ref{32}) converges in $\mathrm{L}^2$ to $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ at the same exponential rate $a > 0$.
\end{definition}

\begin{definition}
	A strong solution $\mathbf{u}(t)$ of the system (\ref{32}) converges to $\mathbf{u}_{\infty} \in\mathbb{H}$ \emph{almost surely exponentially
		stable} if there exists $\upalpha >0$ such that
	$$\lim_{t\to+\infty}\frac{1}{t}\log\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq -\upalpha,\ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.}$$
	In particular, if $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ is a stationary solution of system (\ref{3pp1}), then $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ is called \emph{almost surely exponentially stable} provided that any strong solution to (\ref{32}) converges in $\mathbb{H}$ to $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ with the same constant $\upalpha> 0$.
\end{definition}


Let us now show the exponential stability of the stationary solutions to the system \eqref{3pp1} in the mean square as well as almost sure sense. The authors in \cite{LHGH2} obtained similar results, but with more regularity on the stationary solutions as well as the lower bound of $\mu$ depends on the stationary solutions. The following results are true for all $r\geq 3$, and one has to take $2\beta\mu\geq 1$, for $r=3$. The system under our consideration is 
\begin{equation}\label{3.2}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
\d\mathbf{u}(t)+\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))&=\mathbf{f}+\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))\d\mathrm{W}(t), \ t\in(0,T),\\
\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0,
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
where $\mathbf{f}\in\mathbb{V}'$ and $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega;\mathbb{H})$.

\begin{theorem}\label{exp1}
	Let $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ be the unique stationary solution of (\ref{3pp1}) and  $\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}_{\infty})=0,$ for all $t\geq 0$. Suppose that the conditions in Hypothesis \ref{hyp} are satisfied, then for $\theta=\mu\uplambda_1-(2\eta+L)>0,$ we have 
	\begin{align}\label{6.16}
&\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq e^{-\theta t}\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right],
\end{align}
	provided 
	\begin{align}\label{6.3a}
	\mu>\frac{2\eta+L}{\uplambda_1},
	\end{align}
	where $L$ is the constant appearing in Hypothesis \ref{hyp} (H.3), $\eta$ is defined in \eqref{215} and $\uplambda_1$ is the Poincar\'e constant.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	Let us define $\mathbf{w}:=\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ and $\theta=\mu\uplambda_1-(2\eta+L)>0$. Then $\mathbf{w}$ satisfies the following It\^o stochastic differential: 
	\begin{align}
	\left\{
	\begin{aligned}
	\d\mathbf{w}(t)+\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{w}(t)+(\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}))&+\beta(\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}))\\&=(\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))-\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}_{\infty}))\d\mathrm{W}(t), \ t\in(0,T),\\
	\mathbf{w}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty},
	\end{aligned}
	\right.
	\end{align}
	since $\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}_{\infty})=0$, for all $t\in(0,T)$. Then $\mathbf{w}(\cdot)$ satisfies the following energy equality: 
	\begin{align}
e^{\theta t}	\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=\|\mathbf{w}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\int_0^{t}e^{\theta s}\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}(s)),\mathbf{w}(s)\rangle\d s+\theta\int_0^{t}e^{\theta s}\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\quad-2\int_0^{t}e^{\theta s}\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}(s)),\mathbf{w}(s)\rangle\d s+\int_0^{t}e^{\theta s}\|\widetilde\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+2\int_0^{t}e^{\theta s}(\widetilde{\Phi}(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{w}(s)),
	\end{align}
where $\widetilde{\Phi}(\cdot)=\Phi(\cdot,\mathbf{u}(\cdot))-\Phi(\cdot,\mathbf{u}_{\infty})$. 	A calculation similar to \eqref{4.60} yields 
	\begin{align}\label{4.22}
e^{\theta t}\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&\leq\|\mathbf{w}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2 +\left(\theta+2\eta-\mu\uplambda_1\right)\int_0^{t}e^{\theta s}\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s +\int_0^{t}e^{\theta s}\|\widetilde{\Phi}(s)\|^2_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}\d
s \nonumber\\&\quad +2\int_0^{t}e^{\theta s}(\widetilde{\Phi}(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{w}(s)).
\end{align}
Taking expectation, and using Hypothesis \ref{hyp} (H.3) and the fact that the final term is a martingale, we find 
\begin{align}
	&e^{\theta t}\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{w}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+\left(\theta+\eta+L-\mu\uplambda_1\right)\int_0^{t}e^{\theta s}\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right].
\end{align}
Since $\mu$ satisfies \eqref{6.3a} implies $\theta=\mu\uplambda_1-(2\eta+L)>0$ and an application of Gronwall's inequality yields  \eqref{6.16} is satisfied 	and hence $\mathbf{u}(t)$ converges to $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ exponentially in the mean square sense.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}\label{exp2}
	Let all conditions given in Theorem \ref{exp1} are satisfied and 
	\begin{align}
	\mu>\frac{2\eta+3L}{\uplambda_1}.
	\end{align}
	 Then the strong solution $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ of the system (\ref{32}) converges to the stationary solution $\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ of the system (\ref{3pp2}) almost surely exponentially stable.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	Let us take $n=1,2,\ldots$, $h>0$. Then the process $\|\mathbf{u}(\cdot)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,$ for $t\geq nh$ satisfies:
	\begin{align}\label{6.17}
&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu\int_{nh}^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&=\|\mathbf{u}(nh)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\int_{nh}^t\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\rangle\d s\nonumber\\&\quad-2\int_{nh}^t\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\rangle\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+2\int_{nh}^t\left((\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))-\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}_{\infty}))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\right)\nonumber\\&\quad +\int_{nh}^t\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))-\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}_{\infty})\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s.
	\end{align}
	Taking supremum from $nh$ to $(n+1)h$ and then taking expectation in (\ref{6.17}), we find 
	\begin{align}\label{6.18}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{nh\leq t\leq  (n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mu\int_{nh}^{(n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}(nh)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right] +2\eta\mathbb{E}\left[\int_{nh}^{(n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\quad +\mathbb{E}\left[\int_{nh}^{(n+1)h}\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))-\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}_{\infty})\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\quad +2\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{nh\leq t\leq  (n+1)h}\left|\int_{nh}^t\left((\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))-\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}_{\infty}))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\right)\right|\right],
	\end{align}
	where we used (\ref{2.27}) and (\ref{2.30}). We estimate the final term in the right hand side of the inequality \eqref{6.18} using Burkholder-Davis-Gundy, H\"older's and Young's inequalities as 
	\begin{align}\label{6.19}
	&2\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{nh\leq t\leq  (n+1)h}\left|\int_{nh}^t\left((\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))-\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}_{\infty}))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\right)\right|\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_{nh}^{(n+1)h}\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))-\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}_{\infty})\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|^2_{\mathbb{H}}\d s\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\&\leq 2\sqrt{3}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{nh\leq s\leq  (n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\left(\int_{nh}^{(n+1)h}\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))-\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}_{\infty})\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right)^{1/2}\right]\nonumber\\&\leq \frac{1}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{nh\leq s\leq  (n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+6\mathbb{E}\left[\int_{nh}^{(n+1)h}\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))-\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}_{\infty})\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\right].
	\end{align}
	Substituting (\ref{6.19}) in (\ref{6.18}), and then using Hypothesis \ref{hyp} (see (H.2)), we get 
	\begin{align}\label{6.21}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{nh\leq t\leq  (n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]+\vartheta\mathbb{E}\left[\int_{nh}^{(n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq 2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}(nh)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right],
	\end{align}
	where 
	$$\vartheta=2\left(\mu\uplambda_1-(2\eta+6L)\right)>0.$$
	Let us now use (\ref{6.16}) in (\ref{6.21}) to obtain 
	\begin{align}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{nh\leq t\leq  (n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq 2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]e^{-\theta nh}.
	\end{align}
	Using Chebychev's inequality, for $\epsilon\in(0,\theta)$, we also have 
	\begin{align}
	&\mathbb{P}\left\{\omega\in\Omega:\sup_{nh\leq t\leq  (n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}>e^{-\frac{1}{2}(\theta-\epsilon)nh}\right\}\nonumber\\&\leq e^{(\theta-\epsilon)nh}\mathbb{E}\left[\sup_{nh\leq t\leq  (n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq 2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]e^{-\epsilon nh},
	\end{align}
	and 
	\begin{align}
	&\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{P}\left\{\omega\in\Omega:\sup_{nh\leq t\leq  (n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}>e^{-\frac{1}{2}(\theta-\epsilon)nh}\right\}\leq 2\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\frac{1}{e^{\epsilon h}-1}<+\infty.
	\end{align}
	Thus by the Borel–Cantelli lemma, there is a finite integer $n_0(\omega)$ such that
	\begin{align}
	\sup_{nh\leq t\leq  (n+1)h}\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq e^{-\frac{1}{2}(\theta-\epsilon)nh},\ \mathbb{P}\text{-a.s.,}
	\end{align}
	for all $n\geq n_0$, which completes the proof.
\end{proof}
\subsection{Stabilization by a multiplicative noise}
It is an interesting question  to ask about the exponential stability of  the stationary solution for small values of $\mu$. For the 2D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations, the authors in \cite{CTRJ1} obtained such a stabilization result with the system perturbed by a one dimensional Wiener process $\mathrm{W}(t)$ and for $\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))=\sigma(\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty})$, where $\sigma$ is a real number. The same method we apply to obtain  the stabilization of the stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer  equations by using the same multipliative noise. We have the following stabilization result of the stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer equations by noise:
\begin{theorem}\label{thm4.7}
Let the equations \eqref{32} be perturbed by an one dimensional Wiener process $\mathrm{W}(t)$  with $\Phi(t,\mathbf{u}(t))=\sigma(\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty})$, where $\sigma$ is a real number. Then, there exists $\Omega_0\subset\Omega$ with $\mathbb{P}(\Omega_0 )=0$, such that for all $\omega\not\in\Omega_0$, there exists $T(\omega) > 0$ such that any strong solution $\mathbf{u}(t)$ to (\ref{32}) satisfies
\begin{align}
\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq \|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2e^{-\zeta t}, \ \text{ for any }\ t\geq T(\omega),
\end{align}
where $\zeta=\frac{1}{2}(\sigma^2+2\mu\uplambda_1-2\eta)>0$. In particular, the exponential stability of sample paths  with probability one holds if $\zeta>0$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	We know that the process $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}$ satisfies the following energy equality:
	\begin{align}
	&\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2++2\mu\int_{0}^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&=\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\int_{0}^t\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\rangle\d s\nonumber\\&\quad-2\int_{0}^t\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\rangle\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+2\int_{0}^t\left((\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s)))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\right) +\int_{0}^t\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s.
	\end{align}
	Applying It\^o's formula to the process $\log\|\mathbf{u}(\cdot)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$, we find 
	\begin{align}\label{4.35}
&\log\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\nonumber\\&=\log\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\mu\int_0^t\frac{\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2}{\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2}\d s\nonumber\\&\quad -2\int_{0}^t\frac{\langle\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\rangle}{\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2}\d s-2\int_{0}^t\frac{\langle\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}_{\infty}),\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\rangle}{\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2}\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+2\int_{0}^t\frac{\sigma\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2}{\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2}\d\mathrm{W}(s) +\int_{0}^t\frac{\sigma^2\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2}{\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2}\d s-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t\frac{4\sigma^2\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^4}{\|\mathbf{u}(s)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^4}\d s\nonumber\\&\leq\log\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+(-2\mu\uplambda_1+2\eta-\sigma^2)t+2\sigma\mathrm{W}(t),
	\end{align}
where we used (\ref{2.27}) and (\ref{2.30}).	We know that $\lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\frac{\mathrm{W}(t)}{t}=0$, $\mathbb{P}$-a.s. Thus, one can assure the existence of  a set $\Omega_0\subset\Omega$ with $\mathbb{P}(\Omega_0)=0$, such
	that for every $\omega\not\in\Omega_0$, there exists $T(\omega)>0$ such that for all $t\geq T(\omega)$, we have
	$$\frac{2\sigma\mathrm{W}(t)}{t}\leq\frac{1}{2}(2\mu\uplambda_1-2\eta+\sigma^2).$$
	Hence from (\ref{4.35}), we finally have 
	\begin{align}
	\log\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&\leq\log\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{u}_{\infty}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\frac{1}{2}(\sigma^2+2\mu\uplambda_1-2\eta)t,
	\end{align}
for any $t\geq T(\omega)$,	which completes the proof.
\end{proof}


\section{Invariant Measures and Ergodicity}\label{se7}\setcounter{equation}{0} In this section, we discuss the existence and uniqueness of invariant measures and ergodicity results for the stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer equations \eqref{32}. Let us first provide the definitions of invariant measures,  ergodic, strongly mixing and exponentially mixing invariant measures. Let $\mathbb{X}$ be a Polish space (compete separable metric space).  
\begin{definition}
	A probability measure $\upeta$ on	$(\mathbb{X},\mathscr{B}(\mathbb{X}))$ is called \emph{an invariant		measure or a stationary measure} for a given transition probability	function $\mathrm{P}(t,\mathbf{x},\d \mathbf{y})$ if it satisfies
	$$\upeta(\mathrm{A})=\int_{\mathbb{X}}\mathrm{P}(t,\mathbf{x},\mathrm{A})\d\eta(\mathbf{x}),$$ for all $\mathrm{A}\in\mathscr{B}(\mathbb{X})$ and
	$t>0$. Equivalently, if for all $\varphi\in \mathrm{C}_b(\mathbb{X})$
	(the space of bounded continuous functions on $\mathbb{X}$), and all
	$t\geq 0$,
	$$\int_{\mathbb{X}}\varphi(\mathbf{x})\d\upeta(\mathbf{x})=\int_{\mathbb{X}}(\mathrm{P}_t\varphi)(\mathbf{x})\d\upeta(\mathbf{x}),$$ where the Markov semigroup
	$(\mathrm{P}_t)_{t\geq 0}$ is defined by
	$$\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{x})=\int_{\mathbb{X}}\varphi(\mathbf{y})\mathrm{P}(t,\mathbf{x},\d \mathbf{y}).$$
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}[Theorem 3.2.4, Theorem 3.4.2, \cite{GDJZ}, \cite{MSS}]
	Let $\upeta$ be an invariant measure for $\left(\mathrm{P}_t\right)_{t\geq 0}.$  We say that the measure $\upeta$ is an \emph{ergodic measure,}  if for all $\varphi \in \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^2(\mathbb{X};\upeta), $ we have  $$ \lim_{T\to +\infty}\frac{1}{T}\int_0^T (\mathrm{P}_t\varphi)(\mathbf{x}) \d t =\int_{\mathbb{X}}\varphi(\mathbf{x}) \d\upeta(\mathbf{x}) \ \text{ in } \ \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^2(\mathbb{X};\upeta).$$ The invariant measure $\upeta$ for $\left(\mathrm{P}_t\right)_{t\geq 0}$ is called \emph{strongly mixing} if  for all $\varphi \in \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^2(\mathbb{X};\upeta),$  we have $$\lim_{t\to+\infty}\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{x}) = \int_{\mathbb{X}}\varphi(\mathbf{x}) \d\upeta(\mathbf{x})\ \text{ in }\ \widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^2(\mathbb{X};\upeta).$$ The invariant measure $\upeta$ for $\left(\mathrm{P}_t\right)_{t\geq 0}$ is called \emph{exponentially mixing}, if there exists a constant $k>0$ and a positive function $\Psi(\cdot)$ such that for any bounded Lipschitz function $\varphi$, all $t>0$ and all $\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{X}$, $$\left|\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{x})-\int_{\mathbb{X}}\varphi(\mathbf{x})\d\upeta(\mathbf{x})\right|\leq \Psi(\mathbf{x})e^{-k t}\|\varphi\|_{\mathrm{Lip}},$$  where $\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm{Lip}}$ is the Lipschitz constant. 
\end{definition}

	Clearly exponentially mixing implies strongly mixing. Theorem 3.2.6, \cite{GDJZ} states that if  $\upeta$ is the unique invariant measure for $(\mathrm{P}_t)_{t\geq 0}$, then  it is ergodic. The interested readers are referred to see \cite{GDJZ} for more details on the ergodicity for infinite dimensional systems. 

Let us now show that there exists a unique invariant measure for the Markovian transition probability associated to the  system (\ref{32}). Moreover, we establish that the invariant measure is ergodic and strongly mixing (in fact exponentially mixing). Let $\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{u}_0)$ denotes the unique strong solution of the system (\ref{32}) with the initial condition $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}$. Let $(\mathrm{P}_t)_{t\geq 0}$ be the \emph{Markovian transition semigroup} in the space $\mathrm{C}_b(\mathbb{H})$ associated to the system (\ref{32}) defined by
\begin{align}\label{mar}
\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{u}_0)=\mathbb{E}\left[\varphi(\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{u}_0))\right]=\int_{\mathbb{H}}\varphi(\mathbf{y})\mathrm{P}(t,\mathbf{u}_0,\d
\mathbf{y})=\int_{\mathbb{H}}\varphi(\mathbf{y})\upeta_{t,\mathbf{u}_0}(\d \mathbf{y}),\;\varphi\in \mathrm{C}_b(\mathbb{H}),
\end{align}
where $\mathrm{P}(t,\mathbf{u}_0,\d \mathbf{y})$ is the transition probability of $\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{u}_0)$ and $\upeta_{t,\mathbf{u}_0}$ is the law of $\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{u}_0)$. The semigroup $(\mathrm{P}_t)_{t\geq 0}$ is Feller, since the solution to \eqref{32} depends continuously on the initial data. From (\ref{mar}), we also have
\begin{align}\label{amr}
\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{u}_0)=\left<\varphi,\upeta_{t,\mathbf{u}_0}\right>=\left<\mathrm{P}_t\varphi,\upeta\right>,
\end{align}
where $\upeta$ is the law of the initial data $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}$. Thus from
(\ref{amr}), we have $\upeta_{t,\mathbf{u}_0}=\mathrm{P}_t^*\upeta$. We say that a
probability measure $\upeta$ on $\mathbb{H}$ is an \emph{invariant measure} if
\begin{align}
\mathrm{P}_t^*\upeta=\upeta,\textrm{ for all }\ t\geq 0.
\end{align}
That is, if a solution has law $\upeta$ at some time, then it has the same law for all later times. For such a solution, it can be shown by Markov property that for all $(t_1,\ldots,t_n)$ and $\tau>0$, $(\mathbf{u}(t_1+\tau,\mathbf{u}_0),\ldots,\mathbf{u}(t_n+\tau,\mathbf{u}_0))$ and $(\mathbf{u}(t_1,\mathbf{u}_0),\ldots,\mathbf{u}(t_n,\mathbf{u}_0))$ have the same law. Then, we say that the process $\mathbf{u}$ is \emph{stationary}. For more details, the interested readers are referred to see \cite{GDJZ,ADe}, etc.
\begin{theorem}\label{EIM}
	Let $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}$ be given. Then, for $\mu>\frac{K}{2\uplambda_1},$	there exists an invariant measure for the system (\ref{32}) with support in $\mathbb{V}$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	Let us use the energy equality obtained in \eqref{3.63} to find 
	\begin{align}\label{7.20}
	&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\nonumber\\&=\|{\mathbf{u}_0}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\int_0^t\|\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s+2\int_0^t(\Phi(s,\mathbf{u}(s))\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)).
	\end{align}
Taking expectation in (\ref{7.20}), using Hypothesis \ref{hyp} (H.3), Poincar\'e inequality and the fact that the final term is a martingale having zero expectation, we obtain  
	\begin{align}\label{5.4}
	&	\mathbb{E}\left\{	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\left(2\mu-\frac{K}{\uplambda_1}\right) \int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\right\}\leq
	\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right].
	\end{align}
	Thus, for $\mu>\frac{K}{2\uplambda_1}$, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{5.6}
	\frac{\left(2\mu-\frac{K}{\uplambda_1}\right)}{t}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^{t}\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right]\leq
	\frac{1}{T_0}\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2,\text{ for all }t>T_0.
	\end{align}
Using Markov's inequality, we get
	\begin{align}\label{5.7}
	\lim_{R\to\infty}\sup_{T>T_0}\left[\frac{1}{T}\int_0^T\mathbb{P}\Big\{\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}>R\Big\}\d
	t\right]&\leq
	\lim_{R\to\infty}\sup_{T>T_0}\frac{1}{R^2}\mathbb{E}\left[\frac{1}{T}\int_0^T\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d
	t\right]=0.
	\end{align}
	Hence along with the estimate in (\ref{5.7}),  using the compactness of $\mathbb{V}$ in $\mathbb{H}$, it is clear by a standard argument that the sequence of probability measures $$\upeta_{t,\mathbf{u}_0}(\cdot)=\frac{1}{t}\int_0^t\Pi_{s,\mathbf{u}_0}(\cdot)\d s,\ \text{ where }\ \Pi_{t,\mathbf{u}_0}(\Lambda)=\mathbb{P}\left(\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{u}_0)\in\Lambda\right), \ \Lambda\in\mathscr{B}(\mathbb{H}),$$ is tight, that is, for each $\updelta>0$, there is a compact subset $K\subset\mathbb{H}$  such that $\upeta_t(K^c)\leq \updelta$, for all $t>0$, and so by the Krylov-Bogoliubov theorem (or by a  result of Chow and Khasminskii see \cite{CHKH}) $\upeta_{t_n,\mathbf{u}_0}\to\upeta,$ weakly for $n\to\infty$, and $\upeta$ results to be an invariant measure for the transition semigroup $(\mathrm{P}_t)_{t\geq 0}$,  defined by 	$$\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{u}_0)=\mathbb{E}\left[\varphi(\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{u}_0))\right],$$ for all $\varphi\in\mathrm{C}_b(\mathbb{H})$, where $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is the unique strong solution of (\ref{32}) with the initial condition $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}$.
\end{proof}



Now we establish the uniqueness of invariant measure for the system (\ref{32}).  Similar results for 2D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations is established in \cite{ADe} and for the stochastic 2D Oldroyd models is obtained in \cite{MTM6}. The following result provide the exponential stability results for the system \eqref{32}. 

\begin{theorem}\label{exps1}
	Let $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ and $\mathbf{v}(\cdot)$ be two solutions of the system (\ref{32}) with $r>3$ and the initial data $\mathbf{u}_0,\mathbf{v}_0\in\mathbb{H}$, respectively. Then, for the condition given in \eqref{6.3a}, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{513}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq \|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{v}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2e^{-(\mu\uplambda_1-(2\eta+L))t},
	\end{align}
	where $\eta$ is defined in \eqref{215}. 
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	Let us define $\mathbf{w}(t)=\mathbf{u}(t)-\mathbf{v}(t)$. Then, $\mathbf{w}(\cdot)$ satisfies the following energy equality: 
	\begin{align}\label{514}
	\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2&=\|\mathbf{w}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-2\mu\int_0^t\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s-2\beta\int_0^t\langle
	\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{v}(s)),\mathbf{w}(s)\rangle\d s\nonumber\\&\quad -2\int_0^t\left<\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(s))-\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{v}(s)),\mathbf{w}(s)\right>\d s+\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}\|\widetilde\Phi(s)\|_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{Q}}}^2\d s\nonumber\\&\quad+2\int_0^{t\wedge\tau_N}(\widetilde{\Phi}(s)\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{w}(s)),
	\end{align}
	where $\widetilde{\Phi}(\cdot)=\Phi(\cdot,\mathbf{u}(\cdot))-\Phi(\cdot,\mathbf{v}(\cdot))$. Taking expectation in \eqref{514} and then using the Poincar\'e inequality, Hypothesis (H.3), \eqref{2.27} and (\ref{2.30}), one can easily see that 
	\begin{align}\label{515}
	\mathbb{E}\left[	\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq\|\mathbf{w}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2-\mu\uplambda_1\int_0^t\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\d s+(2\eta+L)\int_0^t\mathbb{E}\left[\|\mathbf{w}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\d s,
	\end{align}
	where $\eta$ is defined in \eqref{215}. 	Thus, an application of the Gronwall's inequality yields 
	\begin{align}
	\mathbb{E}\left[	\|\mathbf{w}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right]\leq \|\mathbf{w}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2e^{-(\mu\uplambda_1-(2\eta+L))t},
	\end{align}
	and for $\mu>\frac{2\eta+L}{\uplambda_1}$, we obtain the required result \eqref{513}. 
\end{proof}

	For $2\beta\mu\geq 1$, the results obtained in the Theorem \ref{exps1} can be established for $\mu>\frac{L}{\uplambda_1}$, using the estimate \eqref{2.26}. Let us now establish the uniqueness of invariant measures for the system \eqref{32} obtained in Theorem \ref{EIM}. We prove the case of $r>3$ only and the case of $r=3$ follows similarly. 


\begin{theorem}\label{UEIM}
	Let the conditions given in Theorem \ref{exps1} hold true and $\mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}$ be given. Then, for  the condition given in \eqref{6.3a}, there is a unique invariant measure $\upeta$ to system (\ref{32}). The measure $\upeta$ is ergodic and strongly mixing, i.e., \begin{align}\label{6.9a}\lim_{t\to\infty}\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{u}_0)=\int_{\mathbb{H}}\varphi(\mathbf{v}_0)\d\upeta(\mathbf{v}_0), \ \upeta\text{-a.s., for all }\ \mathbf{u}_0\in\mathbb{H}\ \text{ and }\  \varphi\in\mathrm{C}_b(\mathbb{H}).\end{align} 
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
For $\varphi\in \text{Lip}(\mathbb{H})$ (Lipschitz $\varphi$), since $\upeta$ is an invariant measure, we have 
	\begin{align}
	&	\left|\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{u}_0)-\int_{\mathbb{H}}\varphi(\mathbf{v}_0)\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\right|\nonumber\\&=	\left|\mathbb{E}[\varphi(\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{u}_0))]-\int_{\mathbb{H}}\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{v}_0)\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\right|\nonumber\\&=\left|\int_{\mathbb{H}}\mathbb{E}\left[\varphi(\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{u}_0))-\varphi(\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{v}_0))\right]\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\right|\nonumber\\&\leq L_{\varphi}\int_{\mathbb{H}}\mathbb{E}\left[\left\|\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{u}_0)-\mathbf{u}(t,\mathbf{v}_0)\right\|_{\mathbb{H}}\right]\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\nonumber\\&\leq  L_{\varphi} e^{-\frac{(\mu\uplambda_1-(2\eta+L))t}{2}}\int_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{v}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\nonumber\\&\leq  L_{\varphi}e^{-\frac{(\mu\uplambda_1-(2\eta+L))t}{2}}\left(\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}+\int_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathbf{v}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\right)\to 0\ \text{ as } \ t\to\infty,
	\end{align}
	since $\int_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathbf{v}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)<+\infty$. Hence, we deduce (\ref{6.9a}), for every $\varphi\in \mathrm{C}_b (\mathbb{H})$, by the density of $\text{Lip}(\mathbb{H})$ in $\mathrm{C}_b (\mathbb{H})$. Note that, we have a stronger result that $\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{u}_0)$ converges exponentially fast to equilibrium, which is the exponential mixing property. This easily gives uniqueness of the invariant measure also. Indeed, if  $\widetilde\upeta$ is an another invariant measure, then
	\begin{align}
	&	\left|\int_{\mathbb{H}}\varphi(\mathbf{u}_0)\upeta(\d \mathbf{u}_0)-\int_{\mathbb{H}}\varphi(\mathbf{v}_0)\widetilde\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\right|\nonumber\\&= \left|\int_{\mathbb{H}}\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{u}_0)\upeta(\d \mathbf{u}_0)-\int_{\mathbb{H}}\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{v}_0)\widetilde\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\right|\nonumber\\&=\left|\int_{\mathbb{H}}\int_{\mathbb{H}}\left[\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{u}_0)-\mathrm{P}_t\varphi(\mathbf{v}_0)\right]\upeta(\d \mathbf{u}_0)\widetilde\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\right|\nonumber\\&\leq L_{\varphi}e^{-\frac{(\mu\uplambda_1-(2\eta+L))t}{2}}\int_{\mathbb{H}}\int_{\mathbb{H}}\|\mathbf{u}_0-\mathbf{v}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}\upeta(\d \mathbf{u}_0)\widetilde\upeta(\d \mathbf{v}_0)\to 0\ \text{ as }\  t\to\infty.
	\end{align}
	By Theorem 3.2.6, \cite{GDJZ}, since $\upeta$ is the unique invariant measure for $(\mathrm{P}_t)_{t\geq 0}$, we know that it is ergodic. 
\end{proof}


\iffalse 
If one considers the following SCBF equations perturbed by additive Gaussian noise, then we have an another result on exponential moments. 
\begin{equation}\label{5.17}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
\d\mathbf{u}(t)+\mu \mathrm{A}\mathbf{u}(t)+\mathrm{B}(\mathbf{u}(t))+\beta\mathcal{C}(\mathbf{u}(t))&=\d\mathrm{W}(t), \ t\in(0,T),\\
\mathbf{u}(0)&=\mathbf{u}_0,
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
where $\mathrm{W}(\cdot)$ is a $\mathrm{Q}$-Wiener process with $\mathrm{Tr}(\mathrm{Q})<+\infty$. The existence and uniqueness of strong solutions as well as the existence of a unique invariant measure for the system \eqref{5.17} can proved in a similar way as in Theorems \ref{exis}, \ref{EIM} and \ref{UEIM}. 


\begin{theorem}Let $\upeta$ be the unique invariant measure for the system \eqref{5.17}, for $r\geq 3$. Then, we have 
	\begin{align}\label{7.25}
	\int_{\mathbb{H}}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0)<+\infty,
	\end{align}
	where 
	\begin{align}\label{721}
	0<\varepsilon\leq \frac{\uplambda_1\mu}{2\|\mathrm{Q}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H})}}. 
	\end{align}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
	In order to prove \eqref{7.25}, we use a stationary solution $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ with invariant law $\upeta$. Note that the process $\|\mathbf{u}(\cdot)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2$ satisfies:
	\begin{align}\label{722}
	&	\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+2\mu \int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\beta\int_0^t\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\nonumber\\&=\|{\mathbf{u}_0}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2+\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}(\mathrm{Q}) t+2\int_0^t(\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)).
	\end{align}
	Let us now apply infinite dimensional It\^o's formula to the process $\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)$  to obtain
	\begin{align}\label{7.28}
	&\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)+2\varepsilon\mu\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s+2\varepsilon\beta\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\nonumber\\&=\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right) +\varepsilon\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}(\mathrm{Q})\d s+2\varepsilon\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\left(\d\mathrm{W}(s),\mathbf{u}(s)\right) \nonumber\\&\quad+2\varepsilon^2\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathrm{Q}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s.
	\end{align} 
	Let  us take expectation in (\ref{7.28}) to obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{7.29}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\right]+2\varepsilon\mu\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\quad+2\varepsilon\beta\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\widetilde{\mathbb{L}}^{r+1}}^{r+1}\d s\right]\nonumber\\&=\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)  +\varepsilon\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}(\mathrm{Q})\d s\right] \nonumber\\&\quad+2\varepsilon^2\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathrm{Q}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d s\right].
	\end{align}
	We know that	\begin{align}\label{5.64}
	\|\mathrm{Q}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq \|\mathrm{Q}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H})}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq \frac{\|\mathrm{Q}\|_{\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{H})}}{\uplambda_1}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2.
	\end{align} and hence choosing $\varepsilon>0$ given in \eqref{721} so that 
	$2\varepsilon\|\mathrm{Q}^{1/2}\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\leq \mu\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2.$
	Thus  from (\ref{7.29}), we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{7.30}
	&\mathbb{E}\left[\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\right] +\varepsilon\mu\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right]\nonumber\\&\leq\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)  +\varepsilon\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}(\mathrm{Q})\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\d s\right].
	\end{align}
We know that $\mathbf{u}(\cdot)$ is stationary with law $\upeta$, so that we have 
	\begin{align}\label{7.31}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\right]=\mathbb{E}\left[\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\right]=\int_{\mathbb{H}}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0),
	\end{align}
	and 
	\begin{align}\label{7.32}
	\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^t\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}(s)\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d s\right]=t\int_{\mathbb{H}}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0).
	\end{align}
	Using (\ref{7.31}) and (\ref{7.32}) in (\ref{7.30}), we obtain 
	\begin{align}\label{7.33}
	\int_{\mathbb{H}}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0)\leq\frac{\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}(\mathrm{Q})}{\mu}\int_{\mathbb{H}}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0).
	\end{align}
	Now for $R>0$, using the Poincar\'e inequality and (\ref{7.33}), we have (see \cite{ADe})
	\begin{align}
	\int_{\mathbb{H}}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0)&=\int_{\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}\leq R}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0)+\int_{\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}> R}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0)\nonumber\\&\leq \exp\left(\varepsilon R^2\right)+\frac{1}{R^2}\int_{\mathbb{H}}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0)\nonumber\\&\leq \exp\left(\varepsilon R^2\right)+\frac{1}{\uplambda_1R^2}\int_{\mathbb{H}}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{V}}^2\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0)\nonumber\\&\leq \exp\left(\varepsilon R^2\right)+\frac{\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}(\mathrm{Q})}{\uplambda_1\mu R^2}\int_{\mathbb{H}}\exp\left(\varepsilon\|\mathbf{u}_0\|_{\mathbb{H}}^2\right)\d\upeta(\mathbf{u}_0).
	\end{align}
	Let us take $\frac{\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}(\mathrm{Q})}{\uplambda_1\mu R^2}=\frac{1}{2},$ to obtain (\ref{7.25}), which completes the proof. 
\end{proof}
\fi 

 \medskip\noindent
{\bf Acknowledgments:} M. T. Mohan would  like to thank the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India for Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research (INSPIRE) Faculty Award (IFA17-MA110) and Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, for providing stimulating scientific environment and resources. The author would also like to thank Prof. J. C. Robinson, University of Warwick for useful discussions. 


