Conjugative DNA transfer is the major cause of rapid dissemination of antibiotic resistance and virulence factors in bacterial pathogens. During bacterial conjugation, a donor bacterium intimately contacts a recipient to form a conjugative pore (a bacterial type IV secretion system) through which a single-stranded DNA is transferred from the donor to the recipient bacterium.^[@ref1],[@ref2]^ In the F and F-like plasmid-mediated bacterial conjugation systems, more than 20 different proteins are involved in DNA processing and conjugative pore formation, most of which are expressed from the polycistronic *tra* operon in the plasmid.^[@ref1]^ Transcription of the *tra* operon requires TraJ, an essential activator of the *tra* operon promoter, P~Y~.

The *traJ* gene is located immediately upstream of the *tra* operon in the F and F-like plasmids, encoding a cytoplasmic protein that binds DNA upstream of P~Y~ presumably through its putative C-terminal helix--turn--helix (HTH) DNA-binding motif (Figure S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}).^[@ref3]^ TraJ is thought to function to relieve P~Y~ from H-NS (histone-like nucleoid structuring protein) repression as well as to activate P~Y~ in an independent mechanism together with a host factor, ArcA.^[@ref4]−[@ref6]^ As a central regulator of bacterial conjugation, the intracellular level of TraJ is stringently regulated at multiple levels by different host and plasmid-encoded factors. CRP (catabolite repressor protein) and Lrp (leucine-responsive protein) regulate *traJ* transcription,^[@ref7]−[@ref9]^ whereas Hfq (host factor for Qβ replicase) and the plasmid-encoded FinOP (fertility inhibition) system affect TraJ translation.^[@ref10]−[@ref12]^ Heat shock chaperonin protein GroEL and the *Escherichia coli* CpxAR two-component system have been found to mediate proteolytic degradation of TraJ.^[@ref13]−[@ref15]^

Despite limited pairwise amino acid sequence identity, all F family TraJ homologues are predicted to have a PAS domain in the N-terminal region (Figure S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}).^[@ref16],[@ref17]^ PAS domains commonly function as sensors in signaling proteins to regulate diverse physiological processes in all three kingdoms of life.^[@ref17],[@ref18]^ PAS domains are characterized by a five-stranded antiparallel β-sheet, flanked by varied numbers of α-helices. Some of the well-characterized PAS proteins include FixL, which is involved in nitrogen fixation in bacteria;^[@ref19]^ PER, which controls circadian behavior in insects;^[@ref20]^ and HIF proteins, which regulate the response to hypoxia in mammals.^[@ref21]^ Typically, PAS domains are covalently linked to and regulate the activities of various effector domains, including enzymes, transcription factors/DNA-binding domains, ion channels, and chemotaxis proteins. PAS domains usually facilitate dimerization or higher-order oligomerization. Some PAS folds bind small-molecule ligands such as metabolites, heme, and flavin nucleotides to exert their physiological activities.^[@ref18],[@ref22]^

Our recent mutational analysis indicates that the putative PAS domain of TraJ~F~ is essential for its homodimerization, intracellular protein stability, and *in vivo* function.^[@ref23]^ Mutation of multiple cysteine residues (Cys30, Cys41, and Cys67) within the TraJ~F~ PAS domain significantly inhibits F conjugation, which leads to the hypothesis that the TraJ cysteines form a redox center for sensing oxidative stress.^[@ref16]^ As most of the characterized single missense mutations can significantly elevate the susceptibility of TraJ~F~ to proteolytic degradation by the protease--chaperone pair HslVU, it was further hypothesized that oxidation of the TraJ PAS domain might trigger HslVU-catalyzed degradation of TraJ, resulting in repression of F plasmid-mediated bacterial conjugation.^[@ref23]^

To obtain structural insights into the putative PAS domain of TraJ, we subcloned and crystallized the N-terminal regions of TraJ from the prototypic F plasmid and *Salmonella enteric* Serovar Typhimurium virulence plasmid pSLT. The two structures, F plasmid TraJ^11--130^ and pSLT TraJ^1--128^, were determined at 1.55 and 1.67 Å resolution, respectively. Both structures exhibit characteristic features of a PAS fold and form homodimers through an extensive dimeric interface. Mutational analysis revealed that residues forming the dimeric interface of TraJ~F~^11--130^ are important for TraJ in activating the *traJ* operon promoter P~Y~, indicating that homodimerization is required for TraJ function. Both the N-terminal PAS domains of pSLT and R100 TraJ are fully active in replacing the corresponding PAS domain of F plasmid TraJ, despite the fact that each of these TraJ homologues is specific in activating its own cognate P~Y~, indicating that the allelic specificity of TraJ is likely governed by its C-terminal domain. On the basis of these results, we further discuss the role of TraJ dimerization in regulating the *in vivo* function of TraJ.

Experimental Procedures {#sec2}
=======================

Growth Media and Bacterial Strains {#sec2.1}
----------------------------------

Cells were grown in LB (Luria-Bertani) broth or on LB solid medium unless otherwise specified. Antibiotics were used at the following final concentrations: 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 30 μg/mL kanamycin. The following *E. coli* strains were used: DH5α \[F^--^Δ*lacU169* (*Φ80lacZ*Δ*M15*) *supE44 hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96*(Nal^r^) *thi-1 relA1*\],^[@ref24]^ BL21-DE3 \[F^--^*ompT hsdS*B (rB^--^mB^--^) *gal dcm*\] (Invitrogen), BW25113 \[Δ(*araD-araB*)*567*Δ*lacZ4787*(::rrnB-3) λ^*--*^*rph-1*Δ(*rhaD-rhaB*)*568 hsdR514*\],^[@ref25]^ JW3686 (Δ*tnaA739::kan* mutant of BW25113),^[@ref25]^ and BE280 \[*lacZ13*(Oc) *lacI22 trp-37 rpsL106*(*strR*)*xylA13 tnaA4 phoS-3 ilv-280*\].^[@ref26]^

Plasmids, Oligonucleotides, and Plasmid Construction {#sec2.2}
----------------------------------------------------

All plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this work are listed in Table S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}. pJLJ2123 was constructed by ligating the 2.5 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of pT7-7^[@ref27]^ to the 0.45 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of DNA amplified from pJLJ001 using JLU321 and JLU323 as primers. pJLJ2829 was constructed by ligating the 2.5 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of pT7-7^[@ref27]^ to the 0.4 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of DNA amplified from pJLJ001 using JLU328 and JLU329 as primers. pJLJ5629 was constructed by ligating the 2.4 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of pK184^[@ref28]^ to the 0.4 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of DNA amplified from pJLJ001 using JLU356 and JLU329 as primers. pJLJ002 was constructed by ligating the 2.4 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of pK184^[@ref28]^ to the 0.7 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of DNA amplified from pIZ2023 (a gift from J. Casadesus, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain) using JLU390 and JLU394 as primers. pJLJ003 was constructed by ligating the 2.4 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of pK184^[@ref28]^ to the 0.8 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of DNA amplified from plasmid R100 using JLU330B and JLU331B as primers. Overlap extension^[@ref29]^ was used to construct pJLJ004 and pJLJ005, expressing hybrid TraJ proteins TraJ~pSLT~^1--125^:TraJ~F~^121--226^ and TraJ~R100~^1--120^:TraJ~F~^121--226^, respectively. The PCR primer pair of JLU390 and JLU391was used to amplify a fragment encoding the plasmid pSLT TraJ N-terminal region (TraJ~pSLT~^1--125^) from pJLJ002. The PCR primer pair of JLU330B and JLU347 was used to amplify a fragment encoding the plasmid R100 TraJ N-terminal region TraJ~R100~^1--120^ from pJLJ003. The primer pair of JLU346 and JLU308 was used to amplify a fragment containing the F plasmid TraJ C-terminal region (TraJ~F~^121--226^) from pJLJ001.^[@ref23]^ The primer pair of JLU390 and JLU308 was used to amplify a pSLT-F hybrid *traJ* (encoding TraJ~pSLT~^1--125^:TraJ~F~^121--226^) fragment, which was further digested by *Eco*RI and *Bam*HI and cloned into the *Eco*RI and *Bam*HI sites of pK184, resulting in pJLJ004. The primer pair of JLU330B and JLU308 was used to amplify an R100-F hybrid *traJ* (encoding TraJ~R100~^1--120^:TraJ~F~^121--226^) fragment, which was further digested by *Eco*RI and *Bam*HI and cloned into the *Eco*RI and *Bam*HI sites of pK184, resulting in pJLJ005. The gene fragment of the pSLT TraJ PAS-like domain (TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^) was PCR-amplified using genomic DNA from *Salmonella enterica* serovar Typhimurium str. 14028S (gi: 267990107) as a template and two primers: forward TraJA and backward TraJB. The PCR product was cloned into vector pMCSG7^[@ref30]^ according to the ligation-independent cloning procedure,^[@ref31],[@ref32]^ resulting in pJSLT128. This vector introduces an N-terminal His~6~ tag followed by a TEV protease recognition site (Table S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}).

Protein Expression and Purification {#sec2.3}
-----------------------------------

To overexpress His~6~-tagged TraJ~F~^11--130^, BL21-DE3 cells containing pJLJ2829 were grown in 1 L of LB broth at 37 °C while being vigorously shaken. After 3 h, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.05 mM, and the culture was grown for an additional 16 h at 20 °C before cells were harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellet was suspended in 80 mL of lysis buffer \[50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM imidazole, 250 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol (pH 7.0)\] with one tablet of Complete, EDTA-free, protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science). The suspension was lysed by sonication on ice for 3 min (30 s with a 30 s break, repeated six times) at maximal output. After centrifugation at 27000*g* for 60 min, the supernatant was loaded on a column with 2 mL of Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) pre-equilibrated with 20 mL of lysis buffer. After the sample had been washed with 30 mL of buffer \[50 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM imidazole, 250 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol (pH 7.0)\], the protein bound to the Ni-NTA agarose was eluted with 10 mL of elution buffer \[50 mM Tris-HCl, 250 mM imidazole, 250 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol (pH 7.0)\] in 2 mL fractions. The fractions containing His-tagged TraJ~F~^11--130^ were pooled and mixed with 300 units of AcTEV protease (Invitrogen) at room temperature for 24 h to cleave the His~6~ tag. The digested mixture was separated by size exclusion chromatography (Hiload 26/60 Superdex 75 prep grade column, Amersham Biosciences), and proteins were eluted with SEC buffer \[50 mM Tris-HCl, 250 mM NaCl, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (pH 7.2)\]. The peak containing pure TraJ~F~^11--130^ was concentrated and buffer-exchanged to 0.5 M ammonium acetate, 10% glycerol, and 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) by using an Amicon ultracentrifuge filter (Millipore). Selenomethionyl TraJ~F~^1--140^ was overexpressed from plasmid pJLJ2123 as previously described^[@ref33]^ and purified in the same manner as TraJ~F~^11--130^. The protein concentration was determined by using BCA protein assays (Pierce) following the manufacturer's instructions.

*E. coli* BL21 cells containing pJSLT128 were grown with ampicillin and kanamycin. A selenomethionine (SeMet) derivative of the expressed protein was prepared and purified using Ni affinity chromatography as described previously.^[@ref34],[@ref35]^ Briefly, the harvested cells, containing SeMet-labeled protein, were resuspended in lysis buffer \[500 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 10 mM imidazole, and 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol\], and the lysate was clarified by centrifugation, filtered through a 0.44 μm membrane, and applied to a 5 mL HiTrap Ni-NTA column (GE Health Systems) on an AKTAxpress system (GE Health Systems). The His~6~-tagged protein was removed by treatment with recombinant His~7~-tagged TEV protease (a gift from D. Waugh, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). Subtractive Ni-NTA affinity chromatography was used to remove the His~6~ tag, uncut protein, and His~7~-tagged TEV protease. The protein of TraJ PAS-like domain was concentrated and exchanged into crystallization buffer containing 250 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES (pH 8.0), and 2 mM DTT through an Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter device. The protein concentration was determined by using UV spectroscopy at 280 nm.

Crystallization and Data Collection {#sec2.4}
-----------------------------------

TraJ~F~^11--130^ or selenomethionyl TraJ~F~^1--140^ was concentrated to ∼3 mg/mL in 0.5 M ammonium acetate, 10% glycerol, and 5 mM DTT. Crystals were obtained using the hanging drop vapor diffusion technique with 3 μL of protein mixed with 3 μL of the well solution at 4 °C for 3--6 weeks. The well solution containing 2.0 M (NH~4~)~2~SO~4~ and 100 mM sodium citrate (pH 5.5) was used for growing both crystals, which were subsequently soaked in the well solution with 25% glycerol for 20 min prior to being flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Data were collected from exposure of single crystals at SIBYLS Beamline of the Advanced Light Source (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA). A three-wavelength MAD data set was collected in inverse-beam mode to 2.3 Å resolution for selenomethionyl TraJ~F~^1--140^ (SeMet-TraJ~F~^1--140^), and a native data set was collected to 1.55 Å for TraJ~F~^11--130^. Data were processed and scaled using the HKL2000 package, and the statistics are listed in Table S2 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}.^[@ref36]^

TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ at 30 mg/mL was crystallized using sitting drop vapor diffusion at room temperature in a Crystal Quick VR 96-well round-bottom plate (Greiner Bio-One North America). The protein solution (0.4 μL) was mixed with 0.4 μL of crystallization reagent using the Mosquito VR nanoliter liquid workstation (TTP LabTech) and allowed to equilibrate against 135 μL of crystallization reagent. Four different crystallization MCSG (the Midwest Center for Structural Genomics) screens (Microlytic) were used: MCSG-1, MCSG-2, MCSG-3, and MCSG-4. The best crystals were obtained under the 67th condition of MCSG-2 that contains 0.1 M [dl]{.smallcaps}-malic acid (pH 7.0) and 20% PEG 3500. Prior to data collection, the crystals were cryoprotected using the solution prepared by adding 15% (v/v) glycerol to the crystallization condition and flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were collected at 100 K at beamline 19-ID of the Structural Biology Center at the Advanced Photon Source (Argonne National Laboratory). Single-wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) data at 0.9792 Å were collected from a single SeMet-labeled protein crystal. The data were collected using SBCCOLLECT and processed and scaled by the HKL3000 suite.^[@ref37]^

Determination and Analysis of Structure {#sec2.5}
---------------------------------------

SOLVE^[@ref38]^ located four expected selenium atoms in the asymmetric unit using the 2.3 Å selenomethionyl TraJ~F~^1--140^ MAD data. The best solution from SOLVE had a *Z* score of 57.2 and a mean figure of merit of 0.3. The maximum likelihood density modification in RESOLVE^[@ref39]^ was used to improve initial phases, yielding an overall figure of merit of phasing of 0.58. Automatic building by RESOLVE^[@ref40]^ using the protein sequence generated a model with ∼200 residues built in an asymmetric unit, which contain a homodimer of SeMet-TraJ~F~^1--140^. The model was used for molecular replacement with MOLREP^[@ref41]^ to generate a TraJ~F~^11--130^ model from the TraJ~F~^11--130^ native data set at 3 Å, which was used as a starting model against the 1.55 Å TraJ~F~^11--130^ native data set for automated model building in ARP/wARP.^[@ref42]^ Iterative runs of ARP/wARP combined with manual model building and iterative cycles of refinement in REFMAC^[@ref43]^ were used to complete and refine the model at 1.55 Å resolution. The final model of the crystallographic asymmetric unit contains two TraJ~F~^11--130^ dimers. There was no interpretable electron density for residues 10, 11, and 128--130. Refinement statistics are summarized in Table [1](#tbl1){ref-type="other"}.

###### Data Collection and Refinement Statistics[a](#t1fn1){ref-type="table-fn"}

                                          SeMet-TraJ~F~^1--140^                                                                           
  --------------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
  Data Collection                                                                                                                         
  space group                             *P*6~2~                 *P*6~1~                 *P*3~2~21                                       
  cell dimensions \[*a*, *b*, *c* (Å)\]   94.54, 94.54, 52.73     95.48, 95.48, 102.3     57.08, 57.08, 67.64                             
  wavelength (Å)                          0.9796                  0.9537                  0.9797                  1.1158                  0.9792
  resolution (Å)                          50--2.30 (2.30--2.38)   50--2.30 (2.30--2.38)   50--2.30 (2.30--2.38)   50--1.55 (1.58--1.55)   1.67--50 (1.67--1.70)
  *R*~merge~ (%)                          10.5 (69.7)             11.2 (76.0)             10.4 (70.9)             5.8 (70.8)              4.9 (45.2)
  *I*/σ*I*                                19.4 (2.7)              18.7 (2.4)              19.8 (2.7)              38.6 (2.3)              14.9 (3.4)
  completeness (%)                        100 (100)               100 (99.6)              100 (99.8)              99.8 (97.2)             99.4 (98.7)
  redundancy                              7.0 (6.6)               6.9 (6.5)               7.0 (6.6)               10.5 (6.1)              6.0 (5.0)
  Refinement                                                                                                                              
  resolution (Å)                                                                                                  50--1.55                1.67--27.9
  no. of reflections                                                                                              75754                   15152
  *R*~work~/*R*~free~                                                                                             16.0/17.8               19.5/22.8
  no. of atoms                                                                                                                             
  protein                                                                                                         3911                    1008
  ligand/ion                                                                                                      30                      26
  water                                                                                                           333                     42
  *B* factor                                                                                                                               
  protein                                                                                                         27.0                    35.3
  ligand/ion                                                                                                      30.5                    43.0
  water                                                                                                           37.4                    40.7
  root-mean-square deviation                                                                                                               
  bond lengths (Å)                                                                                                0.007                   0.006
  bond angles (deg)                                                                                               1.27                    0.976
  Ramachandran (%)                                                                                                                         
  favored                                                                                                         97.3                    100
  allowed                                                                                                         2.7                     0
  outlier                                                                                                         0                       0

Numbers in parentheses are values for the highest-resolution bin.

The structure of TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ was determined by SAD phasing using the HKL3000 suite.^[@ref37]^ SHELXD was used for heavy atom search, and initial phases were obtained from SHELXE.^[@ref44]^ The heavy atom sites were refined, and improved phases were calculated by iterations of MLPHARE^[@ref45]^ and DM.^[@ref46]^ The initial protein models were built in ARP/wARP.^[@ref47]^ Manual model rebuilding was conducted in COOT,^[@ref48]^ and crystallographic refinement was performed in PHENIX51.^[@ref49]^ The final model refined to 1.67 Å was evaluated by MolProbity and a Ramachandran plot with good *R* and *R*~free~ values and stereochemistry. There was no interpretable electron density for N-terminal residues 1--13 and C-terminal residues 127 and 128. The details of the data collection, structure refinement, and model quality are shown in Table S2 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}. The molecular structure figures were prepared by using PyMOL (<http://www.pymol.org>) with surface of internal cavities created using HOLLOW (<http://hollow.sourceforge.net>). CASTp was used for calculating the area and volume of protein internal cavities.^[@ref50]^ Areaimol was used for calculating the area of the protein contact surface.^[@ref51]^

TraJ *in Vivo* Activity Assays {#sec2.6}
------------------------------

Plasmid pJLJ001 (constitutively expressing TraJ~F~ at close to physiological levels) or one of its TraJ~F~ mutant derivatives was transformed into an *E. coli* DH5α strain containing plasmid pJLac101-P~Y~ (carrying an F plasmid P~Y~-*lacZ* fusion). A fresh, single transformant was inoculated into LB broth containing appropriate antibiotics and grown at 37 °C while being shaken for 4 h to an OD~600~ between 0.5 and 1. The function of TraJ~F~ (or its mutant) in activating P~Y~ is represented by the β-galactosidase activity (LacZ activity) determined as described by Miller^[@ref52]^ and reported as Miller units (MU) calculated using the equation 1000\[*A*~420~/(*tv*OD~600~)\], where *t* is the time of reaction (minutes) and *v* is the volume of culture added (milliliters).

Site-Directed Mutagenesis {#sec2.7}
-------------------------

All the primers and plasmids used are listed in Table S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}. All missense mutations of *traJ* are generated as a derivative of plasmid pJLJ001 that constitutively expresses wild-type TraJ~F~ close to physiological levels.^[@ref23]^ L18A was constructed by ligating the 2.4 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of pK184 to the 0.7 kb *Eco*RI--*Bam*HI fragment of DNA amplified from pJLJ001 using JLU349 and JLU308 as primers. Site-directed mutagenesis through overlap extension^[@ref29]^ was used to construct plasmids expressing TraJ~F~-F105A and TraJ~F~-Q116A. The primer pairs used for introducing point mutations into TraJ~F~ are JLU350 and JLU351 for F105A and JLU352 and JLU353 for Q116A. Primers JLU307 and JLU308 were used with the primers listed above to amplify the mutated *traJ* DNA fragments, which were digested by *Eco*RI and *Bam*HI and cloned into pK184, resulting in different pJLJ001 mutant derivatives.

Results {#sec3}
=======

The N-Terminal Region of TraJ Adopts a Conserved PAS Fold Structure {#sec3.1}
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Our previous study indicated that the N-terminal fragment of the F plasmid TraJ, TraJ~F~^1--140^, can be stably overexpressed in *E. coli*.^[@ref23]^ We crystallized and determined the structure of this domain (Table [1](#tbl1){ref-type="other"}). Better crystals were obtained with TraJ~F~^11--130^ after deletion of the disordered regions in the N- and C-termini of TraJ~F~^1--140^, and its structure was further determined as the final model of the TraJ~F~ PAS domain (Table [1](#tbl1){ref-type="other"}). We also crystallized a related domain of TraJ from *S. enterica* Serovar Typhimurium virulence plasmid pSLT, TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^, which shares ∼20% pairwise amino acid sequence identity with its TraJ~F~ counterpart (Figure [1](#fig1){ref-type="fig"}A). Both TraJ~F~ and TraJ~pSLT~ structures were independently determined using Se-methionine-substituted proteins and anomalous scattering techniques, and each was refined to high resolution \[1.55 Å for TraJ~F~ and 1.67 Å for TraJ~pSLT~ (see [Experimental Procedures](#sec2){ref-type="other"} and Table [1](#tbl1){ref-type="other"})\].

![Overall structures of TraJ~F~^11--130^ and TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^. (A) Alignment of amino acid sequences of TraJ~F~^11--130^ and TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^. Secondary structure elements of TraJ~F~^11--130^ and TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ are shown above and below the corresponding sequences, respectively. Dotted lines indicate residues not modeled in the crystal structures because of a lack of electron density. (B) Crystal structure of a TraJ~F~^11--130^ monomer. Secondary structural elements as well as the N- and C-termini are labeled. (C) Crystal structure of a TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ monomer.](bi-2014-00244m_0001){#fig1}

Both the F and pSLT TraJ N-terminal domains adopt PAS folds, characterized by a highly conserved five-stranded antiparallel β-sheet with a 2-1-5-4-3 strand topology (Figure [1](#fig1){ref-type="fig"}A--C).^[@ref17]^,^[@ref18]^ An N-terminal helix (A′α) and two or three less structurally conserved helices are packed against the β-sheet on each side of both PAS domains. In spite of the limited sequence similarity, the two structures are nevertheless highly similar with an rmsd (root-mean-square deviation) calculated on Cα atom positions of ∼2 Å. On the basis of an rmsd of superimposed domains, the two TraJ PAS domains are structurally more similar to one another than to any of the other PAS domains deposited in the protein structure database. The major difference between the two structures is that the TraJ~pSLT~ PAS lacks a helix corresponding to the D/Eα helix of the TraJ~F~ PAS, and this region instead adopts a loop that is more flexible with local *B* factors approximately twice the overall *B* factor of the whole protein chain (Figure [1](#fig1){ref-type="fig"}B,C).

TraJ PAS Domains Form Homodimers {#sec3.2}
--------------------------------

The TraJ~F~ PAS domain crystallographic asymmetric unit contains four protomers that are arranged as a pair of nearly identical dimers (Figure [2](#fig2){ref-type="fig"}A). The asymmetric unit of the TraJ~pSLT~ PAS domain contains only a single protomer; however, a crystallographic 2-fold structure generates a dimer that can virtually be superimposed on the TraJ~F~ PAS dimer (Figure [2](#fig2){ref-type="fig"}B). In the conserved TraJ dimer packing, one protomer is offset from the other by ∼120°. The dimer interface is stabilized by both the coiled coil formed by the N-terminal helices (A′α) and interactions between the conserved β-sheets, which is consistent with other known structures of the PAS domain dimers. Each TraJ~F~^11--130^ molecule has ∼1600 Å^2^ of its ∼5600 Å^2^ total surface area buried at the dimeric interface, whereas ∼1800 Å^2^ of the ∼6100 Å^2^ total surface area of TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ is involved in dimeric contacts.

![Homodimerization of TraJ~F~^11--130^ and TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^. The two protomers of each dimer are colored differently. (A) Crystal structure of a TraJ~F~^11--130^ dimer. (B) Superposition of the TraJ~F~^11--130^ (green) and TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ (blue) dimers. (C) TraJ~F~^11--130^ residues surrounding DTD (shown as spheres) at the dimeric interface. The surface of the internal pocket is colored red. (D) Residues surrounding a small cavity at the dimeric interface of TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^. (E) Position of the DTD (spheres) pocket in the overall structure of a TraJ~F~^11--130^ dimer.](bi-2014-00244m_0002){#fig2}

In both structures, there is an internal cavity enclosed in the dimeric interface of the PAS domain (Figure [2](#fig2){ref-type="fig"}C,D). In the TraJ~F~^11--130^ structure, the cavity has a total surface area of ∼367 Å^2^ and a buried volume of ∼370 Å^3^, and it also contains an artificial ligand, DTD (dithiane diol, oxidized DTT) (Figure [2](#fig2){ref-type="fig"}C,E and Figure S2 and Results of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}). The cavity formed by TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ dimerization is smaller and contains no density corresponding to DTD in spite of the fact that DTT was used during protein purification (Figure [2](#fig2){ref-type="fig"}D). It appears that Tyr27 of TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ (corresponding to Ile22 of TraJ~F~^11--130^) from both protomers partially occludes the pocket, resulting in a smaller buried volume (∼103 Å^3^). Despite our efforts (see Results and Figures S3 and S4 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}), we were unable to determine if a specific physiological ligand exists in the pocket to regulate TraJ dimerization or its *in vivo* function.

Mutations That Affect the PAS Domain and Dimerization of TraJ~F~ {#sec3.3}
----------------------------------------------------------------

We have previously characterized a large collection of missense mutations in TraJ~F~, which were selected from error-prone PCR mutagenesis based on their deleterious effects on activation of the plasmid P~Y~ promoter.^[@ref23]^ All of these mutations are clustered in either an N-terminal region (residues 21--117) or a C-terminal region (residues 150--219), roughly overlapping the PAS domain and the putative helix--turn--helix DNA-binding domain, respectively (Figure S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}). Each of the N-terminal mutations affects the intracellular stability, dimerization, and *in vivo* function of TraJ~F~, suggesting that these features of TraJ~F~ are intrinsically related.^[@ref23]^ The structure of TraJ~F~^11--130^ revealed that most of those functionally conserved N-terminal residues are involved in proper folding of the domain (Figure [3](#fig3){ref-type="fig"}A). Residues Cys30, Phe38, Phe45, Phe49, Ala56, Leu60, Ile70, Val91, Ile93, Trp98, Ile100, Trp115, and Phe117 pack within the hydrophobic core of an individual PAS fold. Residues Ile22, Ile31, and Leu114 are involved in hydrophobic interactions between the conserved N-terminal helix (A′α) and the β-sheet of the PAS fold. The four functionally conserved hydrophilic residues (Arg32, Lys37, Ser62, and Arg96) are surface-exposed and are involved in hydrogen bonding or electrostatic interactions with nearby residues and also likely stabilize the fold.

![Functionally deleterious mutations in TraJ~F~^11--130^ reveal conserved structural components. (A) Mapping of deleterious missense mutations (spheres) onto the TraJ~F~^11--130^ dimer. The two protomers are colored green and yellow. See Figure S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"} for the identity of the missense mutations. (B) Stereoview of the dimerization interface of the TraJ~F~ PAS domain formed by interactions between the N-terminal helices (A′α) and the β-sheets from both protomers. Water molecules are represented by red spheres.](bi-2014-00244m_0003){#fig3}

Among residues that make direct contacts with the partner protomer across the dimerization interface of TraJ~F~^11--130^ (Figure [3](#fig3){ref-type="fig"}B), only one (Val21) was identified as being functionally important in our previous screen. Val21 not only mediates coiled-coil interactions between A′α helices of the two protomers but also interacts with Phe105 in Hβ of the partner protomer. This explains the fact that substitution of Val21 with a negatively charged aspartic acid leads to a \>20-fold decrease in TraJ~F~ activity.^[@ref23]^ To further probe the physiological relevance of the conserved dimeric interface of TraJ PAS domains, we generated less disruptive alanine mutations at three residues (Leu18, Phe105, and Gln116) and assayed the ability of the TraJ~F~ mutants to activate the P~Y~ promoter (Table [2](#tbl2){ref-type="other"} and Figure [3](#fig3){ref-type="fig"}B). Leu18 appears to be involved in coiled-coil interactions between A′α helices across the partner protomers, and the L18A mutation modestly inhibited P~Y~ transcription. The benzyl rings of Phe105 from Hβ of each protomer form intimate hydrophobic interactions with A′α helices of the partner protomer, and the F105A mutation reduced the activity of TraJ~F~ by \>6-fold. The side chains of Gln116 from both protomers are part of the hydrogen bonding network across the dimerization interface also involving Gln103, Tyr118, and two water molecules. The Q116A mutation reduced the activity of TraJ~F~ by ∼50%. These results indicate that the dimeric interface observed in the crystal structure of TraJ~F~^11--130^ is relevant for the TraJ *in vivo* function.

###### Function of F Plasmid TraJ or Its Mutants in Activating the F Plasmid P~Y~[a](#t2fn1){ref-type="table-fn"}

  form of TraJ[b](#t2fn2){ref-type="table-fn"}   codon change   LacZ activity (MU)
  ---------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------------
  TraJ                                           none           3011 ± 239
  TraJ^--^                                       frameshift     55 ± 9
  V21D                                           GTT → GAT      130 ± 10
  L18A                                           CTG → GCG      2500 ± 110
  F105A                                          TTT → GCG      458 ± 37
  Q116A                                          CAA → GCG      1747 ± 131

Determined by assaying the β-galactosidase (LacZ) activity of *E. coli* DH5α cells containing the reporter plasmid pJLAC101-P~Y~ (containing an F plasmid P~Y~-*lacZ* fusion) and the TraJ expression plasmid pJLJ001 (expressing wild-type TraJ), or a pJLJ001 derivative containing a frameshifted *traJ* (TraJ^--^) obtained previously,^[@ref23]^ or one of the pJLJ001 derivatives expressing TraJ missense mutants.

TraJ mutants are named after their corresponding amino acid residue substitutions.

Functional Interchangeability of the TraJ PAS Domains in the F Family of Conjugative Plasmids {#sec3.4}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A recent study indicates that F-like plasmid R1 TraJ (TraJ~R1~) shares a certain level of functional interchangeability with TraJ~pSLT~ but not with TraJ~F~ or another F-like plasmid R100 TraJ (TraJ~R100~).^[@ref4]^ To further test the allelic specificity of different TraJ proteins, we assessed the ability of TraJ from F, pSLT, and R100 to drive transcription from an F P~Y~-*lacZ* fusion reporter plasmid, pJLac101-P~Y~.^[@ref23]^ Each of the TraJ proteins was expressed from the pK184 expression plasmid such that each was produced at close to physiological levels.^[@ref23]^ The results showed that only TraJ~F~ activated F plasmid P~Y~ whereas neither pSLT or R100 TraJ was able to activate transcription above the level of the *traJ* control, suggesting that each TraJ homologue is functionally specific to its own cognate plasmid (Table [3](#tbl3){ref-type="other"}).

###### Ability of TraJ Homologues and Hybrid TraJ To Activate the F Plasmid P~Y~[a](#t3fn1){ref-type="table-fn"}

                       TraJ~F~      TraJ^--^   TraJ~pSLT~   TraJ~R100~   TraJ~pSLT~^1--125^:TraJ~F~^121--226^   TraJ~R100~^1--120^:TraJ~F~^121--226^
  -------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------ -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
  LacZ activity (MU)   2870 ± 126   55 ± 9     46 ± 3       41 ± 5       2873 ± 76                              2796 ± 310

The ability of different TraJ proteins to activate P~Y~ was determined in *E. coli* cells containing a corresponding TraJ construct (from pJLJ001 to pJLJ005) and the F plasmid P~Y~-*lacZ* fusion reporter plasmid pJLac101-P~Y~ as described in [Experimental Procedures](#sec2){ref-type="other"}. The LacZ activity shown is the average of results from two independent samples. As a negative control, pJLJ2729 (a pJLJ001 derivative missing the C-terminal region of the F plasmid *traJ*) has a LacZ activity of 43 ± 3 MU.

To determine which function domain of TraJ carries this allelic specificity, we performed a domain swapping experiment based on the amino acid sequence and structural alignments of the F family TraJ homologues (Figure [1](#fig1){ref-type="fig"}A and Figure S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}). We replaced the PAS domain in the F plasmid TraJ with the PAS domain of pSLT or R100 TraJ to test the ability of the hybrid TraJ to activate F plasmid P~Y~ in pJLac101-P~Y~ (Table [3](#tbl3){ref-type="other"}). Interestingly, both the hybrid versions of TraJ (TraJ~pSLT~^1--125^:TraJ~F~^121--226^ and TraJ~R100~^1--120^:TraJ~F~^121--226^) activated the F plasmid P~Y~ at levels comparable to that of the F plasmid TraJ, indicating that the allelic specificity of the F family plasmid TraJ lies in its C-terminal functional domain that includes a putative HTH DNA-binding motif whereas the PAS domains of TraJ homologues are functionally interchangeable in spite of their limited amino acid sequence homology.

Discussion {#sec4}
==========

Consistent with previous bioinformatics analysis,^[@ref16],[@ref17]^ the X-ray crystal structures of TraJ~F~^11--130^ and TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ presented here indicate that the F family TraJ proteins contain structurally similar N-terminal PAS domains despite limited amino acid sequence homology (Figure [1](#fig1){ref-type="fig"} and Figure S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}). TraJ proteins also homodimerize similarly, forming an extensive dimeric interface (Figure [2](#fig2){ref-type="fig"}). The observed structural details of the TraJ~F~^110--130^ PAS fold and its dimeric interface are fully supported by extensive mutational and functional analysis (Figure [3](#fig3){ref-type="fig"} and Table [2](#tbl2){ref-type="other"}). Although F, R100, and pSLT TraJ appear to activate only their cognate *tra* operon promoters, the PAS domains of these TraJ homologues are functionally interchangeable (Table [3](#tbl3){ref-type="other"}), indicating that the allelic specificity of F family TraJ is carried by only the region C-terminal to the PAS domain. Because the C-terminal domain is thought to act as a DNA-binding domain,^[@ref3]^ our finding suggests that plasmid specificity is governed at the level of protein--DNA interactions, whereas the PAS domain might be dedicated to regulatory functions, possibly in response to cellular signals, as signal sensing is a common feature in many known PAS domains.^[@ref18]^

In the crystal structures of both TraJ~F~^11--130^ and TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^, there is an internal pocket formed at the dimer interface (Figure [2](#fig2){ref-type="fig"}). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first observation of an internal pocket formed through homodimerization of a PAS domain. While some PAS domains have ligand-binding pockets as part of their signaling function, these ligands commonly bind within a single PAS unit.^[@ref18],[@ref22]^ We were unable to determine whether there is a specific physiological ligand in the TraJ PAS dimer pocket to regulate its function (see Results and Figures S3 and S4 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}); however, we cannot rule out the possibility that a small-molecule ligand may regulate TraJ PAS dimerization in response to environmental cues.

PAS domains promote oligomerization of many proteins, and it has been hypothesized that signal-induced changes in protein quaternary structure are involved in the signal transduction function of many PAS proteins.^[@ref18]^ A previous study suggested that multiple cysteines in TraJ could be part of a metal-containing redox center to regulate transcription of the *tra* operon in response to oxidative pressure.^[@ref16]^ The crystal structures of TraJ~F~^11--130^ and TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ reveal that these cysteines do not interact with one another or metal ligands (Figure [3](#fig3){ref-type="fig"}A and Figure S1 of the [Supporting Information](#notes-4){ref-type="notes"}), and therefore, it is unlikely that they coordinate with a metal ion to form a redox center. Instead, these cysteines in the observed structures pack separately in the hydrophobic core of the PAS domain, explaining the previous observation that mutation of Cys30 to a serine or a tryptophan severely affects protein stability, dimerization, and *in vivo* function of TraJ~F~.^[@ref23]^

TraJ PAS domains dedicate a large surface area to homodimerization (Figure [1](#fig1){ref-type="fig"}), and all dimerization-defective TraJ~F~ missense mutants that we have identified previously are significantly more sensitive than wild-type TraJ~F~ to proteolytic degradation by the HslVU protease--chaperone pair *in vivo*.^[@ref23]^We hypothesize that folding of the TraJ PAS domain relies on its dimerization. Cellular signals could potentially modulate TraJ dimerization and therefore influence the susceptibility of TraJ to HslVU, providing a mechanism for regulating cellular TraJ levels and *tra* operon activity.

Methods that are used only for work described in the Results in the Supporting Information, our finding that indole or DTD is not required for TraJ~F~ to function under optimal growth conditions, a list of all the references cited in the Supporting Information, all the plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this work (Table S1), amino acid sequence alignment of the major TraJ orthologues, ranges of PAS domains and the putative HTH motif, and amino acid substitutions that affect TraJ~F~ function (Figure S1), electron density at the DTD pocket of the TraJ~F~^11--130^ dimer (Figure S2), GC/MS-EI analysis of purified DTT-free TraJ~F~^11--130^, which indicates the presence of indole present in the protein sample (Figure S3), and evidence that indole or DTD does not affect the protein stability, dimerization, or *in vivo* function of TraJ~F~ (Figure S4). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at <http://pubs.acs.org>.

Supplementary Material
======================

###### 

bi500244m_si_001.pdf

Coordinates and structure factors for TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ and TraJ~F~^11--130^ have been deposited in Protein Data Bank as entries 4EW7 and 4KQD, respectively.

We acknowledge support via Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant CIHR 42447 (J.N.M.G.), National Institutes of Health Grants NIGMS PSI-Biology GM094585 (A.J., MCSG) and GM094623 (J.N.A.), and the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, via Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

We thank S. Classen for assistance with crystallographic data collection (Advanced Light Source, SIBYLS beamline 12.3.1). We acknowledge Robert Jedrzejczak for providing a clone of the TraJ from *S. enterica* TraJ~pSLT~^1--128^ and Josep Casadesus for providing plasmid pIZ2023.

BS^3^

:   bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate

DTD

:   dithiane diol

CRP

:   catabolite repressor protein

DTT

:   dithiothreitol

GC/MS-EI

:   gas chromatography/mass spectrometry-electron ionization

Hfq

:   host factor for Qβ replicase

HTH

:   helix--turn--helix

H-NS

:   histonelike nucleoid structuring protein

LB

:   Luria-Bertani

Lrp

:   leucine-responsive protein

MALDI-TOF

:   matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight

MCSG

:   Midwest Center for Structural Genomics

MU

:   Miller units

PAS

:   Per-ARNT-Sim

SAD

:   single-wavelength anomalous dispersion

SeMet

:   selenomethionine.
