\section{Discussion} 

Interpreting the PBV correlation within the RPM implies that both NS and BHC
systems share relatively high values of their specific angular momentum 
($a/M\sim 0.1-0.3$ for BHCs or $\nu_s = 300-900$~Hz for relatively stiff EOS
NSs).  
An interesting feature of the $2\nu_{nod}$ vs. $\nu_{per}$ curves 
obtained from relativistic rotating NS models (see Fig.~1b), is that 
for high values of $\nu_{per}$ the 
increase of $\nu_{nod}$ for increasing $\nu_{s}$ tends to saturate,  
such that the curves for relatively high values of $\nu_{s}$ are 
closely spaced. This results from the increasingly important role of 
the (retrograde) quadrupole nodal precession relative to the 
(prograde) frame dragging nodal precession. 
This might help explain the relatively narrow range of 
$\nu_{HBO}$ in Z-sources, if these possess    
$\nu_{s}$ in excess of $\sim 500-600$~Hz. Population synthesis calculations 
show that a significant fraction of low magnetic field, relatively stiff EOS
NSs in LMXRBs can be spunup by accretion torques to $\nu_{s} \sim 1$~kHz, 
provided that $> 0.3-0.4$~M$_{\odot}$ are accreted (Burderi et al. 1999).
The combination of the relatively high NS mass and spin frequency required
by  the RPM is at least qualitatively in agreement with evolutionary
scenarios for LMXRBs. Detecting the lower frequency end of the
$\nu_2-\nu_1$  correlation in NS systems would provide an important test of
the  RPM interpretation. 

In the Kerr metric, the increase in $\nu_{nod}$ for increasing 
values of $a/M$ shows no signs of saturation (Fig.1A). 
BHCs can in principle achieve extreme values 
of $a/M \simeq 1$ (NS are instead limited to values of 
$< 0.6-0.7$, cf. Salgado et al. 1994). 
In practice spinup to high values of $a/M$ is unlikely to occur in BHC 
LMXRBs, because of the limited mass 
that can be accreted from the donor star (King \& Kolb 1999). 
In the RPM the higher frequency BHC QPOs 
({\it e.g.} the $\sim 300$~Hz QPOs of GRO1655-40) 
are interpreted in terms of $\nu_1 = \nu_{per}$ 
(while the lower frequency QPOs $\nu_{HBO}=\nu_{nod}$), implying   
$a/M \sim 0.1-0.3$, in agreement with 
accretion-driven spinup scenarios. This is at variance with the high values of 
$a/M$ ($\sim 0.95$ for GRO 1655-40) derived from the $\nu_1 = \nu_{nod}$ 
interpretation of Cui et al. (1998). 
The detection of a QPO signal at $\nu_\phi$ in BHC systems 
({\it i.e.} the equivalent to the higher kHz QPO at $\nu_2$ in NS systems)
could provide an additional test of the RPM. 
Due to the $\nu_\phi \propto M^{-2/5}$ scaling (cf. Eq.4 and Fig.1A) 
the frequency of these BHC QPOs should be somewhat lower than the $\nu_2$ 
of NS systems. The case of the $\sim 300$~Hz QPOs from GRO~1655-40
is especially interesting in this respect: from Fig.1A it is apparent that 
the relevant points lie close to the high frequency end of the 
$a/M=0.1$, $m=7$ line. Since the mass of the BHC in GRO~1655-40 determined 
through optical observations is $\sim 7$~M$_{\odot}$ 
(Orosz \& Bailyn 1997; Shahbaz et al. 1999), 
we conclude that, according to the RPM, $\nu_{per}\sim 300$~Hz 
close to the marginally stable orbit, where
$\nu_{\phi} \sim \nu_{per}$. This suggests that an additional QPO 
signal at $\nu_2 = \nu_{\phi}$ might well be close to  
or even blended with the QPO peak at $\nu_1$. 
The detection of two closeby or even partially overlapping QPO peaks 
close to $\sim 300$~Hz in GRO~1655-40 would therefore provide 
further evidence in favor of the RPM interpretation.
Similar considerations might apply to the $\sim 284$~Hz QPOs 
of XTE~J1550-564 (Homan et al. 1999), 
provided its BHC mass is in the $\sim 7$~M$_{\odot}$
range. 

In the RPM the QPO signals at $\nu_{nod}$ and $\nu_{per}$ 
are produced over a limited range of radii. For kHz QPO NS systems these 
radii are remarkably close to the marginally stable orbit. 
In the model discussed here the eccentricity and tilt angle 
are allowed only very small values,
such that the QPO frequency variations of a given source 
are ascribed entirely to variations of the radius at which the signals 
are produced. 
As shown in section 2, this is sufficient to
interpret the salient features of the $\nu_{HBO}$ and  $\nu_2$ vs. $\nu_1$
correlations.  
Corrections for non-negligible eccentricities or tilt angles are 
small. In the weak field and slow rotation limit, $\nu_{\phi}$, 
$\nu_{per}$ and $\nu_{nod}$ are 
independent of the tilt angle, while a finite eccentricity $e$ would 
give rise to a factor of $(1-e^2)^{3/5}$ and  $(1-e^2)^{-3/10}$ 
on the right hand side of  Eqs. 4 and  5 , respectively. The corresponding
corrections amount to $<16$\% for $e<0.5$.

The orbital radius is 
approximately given by $ r/M \simeq 100\ m^{-2/5}\nu_{per}^{-2/5}$. 
To interpret in this context the lowest observed values of 
$\nu_1$, {\it i.e.} $\sim 2$ and $10$~Hz in NS and BHC systems respectively, 
radii as large as $r/M \sim 30 $ are required.  
While $\sim 4-5$ times larger than the marginally stable orbit and/or 
the NS, these radii are still small enough that the 
gravitational energy released locally can account for the 
observed QPO amplitudes. 
At present we can only speculate on the physical mechanism determining
the radius at which the QPOs are produced and its variation in each  source 
and across different sources. This radius  
must decrease for increasing mass accretion rates, 
as there is much evidence that in Atoll and Z sources the 
frequency of the kHz QPOs is a reliable indicator of the mass accretion 
rate.
Many NS and BHC LMXRBs display two
component  X-ray spectra consisting of a soft 
thermal component, usually interpreted in terms of emission from an optically
thick accretion disk, and a harder often power-law like component, that 
might originate in a hot innner disk region. As the {\it rms} amplitude of 
kHz QPOs and HBOs increases steeply with energy, QPOs are likely associated to 
the hard spectral component.
One possibility is that the QPOs originate at the transition radius 
between the optically thick disk to the hot inner region, perhaps 
as a result of occultation by orbiting blobs. 
A further exploration of this idea is beyond the purpose of this {\it Letter}. 
We note, however, that 
variations of the inner radius of the optically
thick disk have been inferred in a few NS 
and BHC systems (notably  GRS~1915+105, Belloni et al. 1997; see also 
the case of 4U~0614+091, Ford et al. 1997) 
through spectral variability analysis. 
The resonant blob z-oscillations discussed by Vietri \& 
Stella (1998) do occur at well defined radii, but are not relevant to BHCs 
as they require an offset magnetic field anchored to the accreting star. 

In summary the RPM, unlike other models ({\it e.g.} BFMs), 
holds for BHCs as well as NSs; its applications to the striking correlation in
the QPO (and/or peaked noise) frequencies of NS and BHC LMXRBs gives remarkably
good  results. 
 
LS acknowledges useful discussions with T. Belloni, D. Psaltis and 
M. van der Klis. 


\newpage

