INTRODUCTION
============

External apical root resorption (EARR) is an adverse effect of orthodontic treatment in most of the patients, which results in the permanent loss of tooth structure from the root apex. Not only due to orthodontic treatment, the incidence of functional root resorption can also be found at the age of 32 to 50 years.[@B1] Few studies have documented extreme resorption sequelae that might negatively affect the patients.

Root resorption is considered an important adjunct effect of orthodontic treatment, which may start in any stage of treatment. Root resorption is usually initiated between the second and fifth weeks of orthodontic treatment, but it can only be identified on radiographs after 3 to 4 months.[@B2] Although many characteristics of root resorption remain unclear, it is considered a complicated biological process, which occurs when forces generated at the root apex surpass the resistance and reparative capability of the periapical tissues. The progress and severity of EARR are exaggerated by various risk factors.[@B3]

In 1997, Harris et al.[@B4] conducted the first study on the genetic influence on EARR. Thereafter, various genetic association studies have been conducted on the interrelationship between EARR and orthodontic treatment.[@B5][@B6][@B7][@B8][@B9][@B10]

A few studies documented the association of different genes, such as interleukin 1 (IL-1A, IL-1B, and IL-RN), vitamin D receptor, tumor necrosis factor-α, *TNSALP*, *TNFRSF11A*, and osteopontin, with EARR during orthodontic treatment.[@B5][@B6][@B10] Moreover, various studies have aimed to investigate the association between gene polymorphisms and the risk of EARR during orthodontic treatment. However, the outcomes of these studies have been contradictory.

Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether these gene polymorphisms are associated with EARR during orthodontic treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
=====================

This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines ([Figure 1](#F1){ref-type="fig"}). Moreover, to better outline the study, the participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study designs (PICOS) format was followed.[@B11] Literature search was conducted on the PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus databases (studies included until February 28, 2017) by using the following key words: "Gene, Polymorphism, EARR, external apical root resorption, and orthodontic treatment." No restrictions were imposed on population, language, sample size, and treatment duration. All suitable articles were selected and their references were rechecked for any relevant articles overlooked during the electronic searches.

The inclusion criteria for the published articles were as follows: 1) association between genetic polymorphisms and the risk of EARR and 2) genotypes determined by calculating the odds ratios (ORs). Moreover, 1) studies with duplication of data, 2) review articles, and 3) studies with insufficient data were excluded. Two reviewers independently reviewed all the articles and selected the studies on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. No disagreement occurred between the two reviewers. The studies were selected for the systematic review when they fulfilled the appropriate criteria.

For quality evaluation, the strengthening the reporting of genetic association (STREGA) statement and checklist were followed.[@B12] Methodologic quality scores were calculated and ranged from 0 (lowest) to 20 (highest). Studies with scores \< 10 were considered low-quality studies and those with scores ≥ 10 were considered high-quality studies.

A meta-analysis was performed on the basis of the association of a similar gene (IL-1B \[+3954\]) with the EARR outcomes of selected studies.

Statistical analysis
--------------------

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) Software version 3 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). To assess the interobserver agreement of the grading qualities of the studies, Cohen\'s kappa analysis was performed to identify the quality of the studies. The level of agreement was graded according to the kappa scores, with 0.81--1, 0.61--0.80, 0.41--0.60, 0.21--0.40, and \< 0.20 indicating near perfect, substantial, moderate, fair, and poor agreement, respectively.[@B13]

ORs with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used to estimate the power of the association between EARR and gene polymorphisms. A dominant model (CC + CT vs. TT), co-dominant model (CC vs. TT or CT vs. TT), and recessive model (CC vs. CT + TT) were used to obtain the pooled OR. Residuals were checked for suspected outliers in each study. Heterogeneity was tested using Q statistics and I^2^ statistics. I^2^ \< 50% and a *p*-value of Q statistics \> 0.10 indicated a lack of heterogeneity across the studies.

Publication bias was estimated using the funnel plot, wherein an asymmetric plot indicated possible bias. Begg\'s[@B14] and Egger\'s test[@B15] methods were used for assessing the funnel plot. A *p*-value \< 0.05 was considered to indicate the presence of bias among the studies, and a *p*-value \> 0.05 was considered to indicate the opposite.

RESULTS
=======

The PRISMA guidelines were strictly followed to select the articles as presented in [Figure 1](#F1){ref-type="fig"}. The total number of articles identified for this study was 40: 14 from PubMed, 14 from Scopus, and 12 from Science Direct, after being confirmed by the two independent reviewers. One article was included after manually searching the bibliographies of all the relevant articles. After removing duplicates, 19 publications were selected for the current study. Two studies were further excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. After excluding the duplicates and including the manually searched article, a total of 17 articles were finally included in the systematic review ([Table 1](#T1){ref-type="table"}) and 7 were included in the meta-analysis ([Table 2](#T2){ref-type="table"}).

Quality assessment of the selected studies for this systematic review according to the STREGA guidelines[@B14][@B15] was performed by two independent reviewers. Among the 17 selected studies, 11 were classified as high-quality studies (≥ 10) and 6 as low-quality studies (\< 10) ([Table 3](#T3){ref-type="table"}). Inter-rater reliability for these five criteria was 0.728, which represented a substantial level of agreement. Cohen\'s kappa score for most of the criteria showed the absolute level of inter-rater agreement ([Table 4](#T4){ref-type="table"}).

The analysis of the association of EARR risk with the IL-1B (+3954) polymorphism showed that none of the dominant, co-dominant, and recessive models were associated with the risk of EARR. Moreover, although a less-expected frequency residual was detected because of a sampling error, it could still be included in the meta-analysis in the random-effect model without heavily influencing the outcome ([Figures 2](#F2){ref-type="fig"}, [3](#F3){ref-type="fig"}, [4](#F4){ref-type="fig"}, [5](#F5){ref-type="fig"} and [Table 5](#T5){ref-type="table"}).

Both clinical and statistical heterogeneity were observed among the studies in the dominant, co-dominant, and recessive models ([Table 6](#T6){ref-type="table"}). Sensitivity analysis was performed after omitting one study at each step to observe the influence of each study on the pooled OR. However, the heterogeneity persisted irrespective of which study was omitted.

No evidence of publication bias was observed while comparing the IL-1B (+3954) polymorphism with the overall risk of EARR included in the meta-analysis ([Figure 6](#F6){ref-type="fig"} and [Table 7](#T7){ref-type="table"}).

DISCUSSION
==========

In this systematic review, 11 of the 17 studies were classified as high-quality studies and 6 as low-quality studies. Many studies suggested that genetic polymorphisms may be associated with EARR.[@B6][@B8][@B16][@B17][@B18][@B19][@B20][@B21][@B22][@B23] However, few studies opposed this association.[@B7][@B10][@B24] The STREGA guidelines were formulated for conducting geneticassociation studies to ensure they could attain a score of 20 regardless of the outcome.[@B12] However, in the current systematic review, none of the 11 studies classified as high-quality studies (score ≥ 10) could attain a score of 20. In contrast, the low-quality studies (score \< 10) failed to fulfill the minimum categories of the STREGA guidelines, which might lead to a biased outcome in genetic-association studies. Most of the genetic studies associated with orthodontic treatment rarely comply with the STREGA or any other genetic guidelines. Therefore, specific studies may introduce bias owing to methodological inaccuracies.

A previous study revealed that under the same mechanical stress during orthodontic treatment, many subjects showed a low resistance to EARR, whereas others experienced severe EARR.[@B4] In this respect, many researchers investigated a possible link between polymorphic targets in different genes and the association of EARR with orthodontic treatment.[@B7][@B8][@B9] The current systematic review showed that 15 of the 17 studies aimed to determine the association of IL-1 cluster genes with EARR.

Cytokines have been revealed to disturb bone remodeling and are presently assumed to play a vigorous role in both physiological and pathological bone regulation. Many cells are involved in bone resorption and formation, including osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and bone marrow cells.[@B25][@B26] IL-1 is one of the most important monocyte-macrophage-derived cytokines that acts as a potent stimulator of bone resorption in organ culture.[@B27] IL-1 has been verified to stimulate bone resorption both *in vitro* and *in vivo*.

At present, the IL-1B (+3954) gene polymorphism has been documented as a high-risk factor associated with EARR.[@B5] Patients who are homozygous for the IL-1B (+3954) allele 1 have a 95% probability of developing root resorption of more than 2 mm.[@B28] Among the 17 articles selected for this systematic review, 14 were conducted to determine the association between IL-1 and IL-1B (+3954) polymorphisms and EARR. Owing to their similar methodology, 7 studies were selected for this meta-analysis to determine the relationship between the IL-1B (+3954) gene polymorphism and EARR. The pooled result showed a negative association between EARR and the IL-1B (+3954) gene polymorphism. A small sample size, inclusion of different ethnic groups, and other confounding factors might be the reasons behind this insignificant association. The studies included in this meta-analysis had sample sizes less than 100, except for 2 studies. Moreover, 5 of 7 studies were conducted in different ethnic groups, and the frequency of genotypes varied among ethnicities. In addition, confounding factors such as sex, treatment modalities, duration of treatment, smoking, diabetes, and body mass index may influence the occurrence of EARR, but these were not considered in this study; therefore, the outcome may be inaccurate. In addition, different radiography techniques, such as lateral cephalography, orthopantomography, and cone beam computed tomography, were used for measuring the EARR in different studies. The different precisions of these different radiography techniques may affect the outcome of the analyses. Iglesias-Linares et al.[@B8] conducted three different studies using IL-1B (+3954) and EARR aiming to obtain different outcomes. Although the ethnic groups, genotyping methods, and biological markers were identical in the aforementioned studies, the sample sizes and objectives were different, and this resulted in the different outcomes.[@B8][@B22][@B23]

Although only some studies found a positive association between IL-1B gene polymorphisms and EARR, the negative result of this meta-analysis will be a matter of argument. Therefore, we conducted statistical heterogeneity tests by using I^2^ and Q statistics, which indicated that the significant heterogeneity observed in the current meta-analysis may alternatively suggest a bias in the design of some of the analyzed studies.[@B29] Nevertheless, clinical heterogeneity is always present in a metaanalysis and is based on the sample size, study design, intervention, and outcomes. The current meta-analysis also represented clinical heterogeneity based on the ethnic background, sample size, genotyping methods, and outcomes.

EARR is a common phenomenon after orthodontic treatment.[@B23][@B30][@B31] Therefore, assessing the risk of developing EARR after orthodontic treatment is an important factor for successful treatment. Progression of EARR is a multifactorial event. The results of the current systematic review and meta-analysis may, together with further research, support that several genes are closely associated with EARR. Monitoring and screening for EARR risk in patients receiving orthodontic treatment are valuable components for ensuring more effective control and prevention of EARR.

CONCLUSION
==========

· The outcome of this systematic review shows that different gene polymorphisms may indicate the occurrence of EARR in some individuals undergoing orthodontic treatment.

· The present study also proposes certain recommendations for prospective researchers assessing gene polymorphisms in patients receiving orthodontic treatment.

· The meta-analysis suggested that the IL-1B polymorphism is not associated with a predisposition to EARR, but there was significant heterogeneity among the study results. However, the heterogeneity among the published studies remains inexplicable.

· Although IL-1B is considered a promising gene for predicting EARR in patients receiving orthodontic treatment, further better-controlled studies are warranted to verify this association.

The authors are grateful for the financial support from Universiti Sains Malaysia (Graduate Assistant Scheme to SAN and Vice Chancellor Award to FS).

**How to cite this article:** Nowrin SA, Jaafar S, Rahman NA, Basri R, Alam MK, Shahid F. Association between genetic polymorphisms and external apical root resorption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Orthod 2018;48:395-404.

**CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:** No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

![Flow chart of the PRISMA guidelines for study selection.](kjod-48-395-g001){#F1}

![Forest plots of external apical root resorption risk associated with the interleukin-1B polymorphism (CC vs. TT). OR, Odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.](kjod-48-395-g002){#F2}

![Forest plots of external apical root resorption risk associated with the interleukin-1B polymorphism (CT vs. TT). OR, Odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.](kjod-48-395-g003){#F3}

![Forest plots of external apical root resorption risk associated with the interleukin-1B polymorphism (CC+CT vs. TT). OR, Odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.](kjod-48-395-g004){#F4}

![Forest plots of external apical root resorption risk associated with the interleukin-1B polymorphism (CC vs. CT+TT). OR, Odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.](kjod-48-395-g005){#F5}

![Funnel plot for the publication bias test (CT vs. TT).](kjod-48-395-g006){#F6}

###### Main characteristics of the included studies

![](kjod-48-395-i001)

VDR, Vitamin D receptor; EARR, external apical root resorption; CBCT, cone-beam computed tomography; IL, interleukin; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; OPG, osteoprotegerin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VNTR, variable number tandem repeat.

###### Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis

![](kjod-48-395-i002)

Values are presented as number only or number (%).

EARR, External apical root resorption.

###### Quality assessment of the included studies

![](kjod-48-395-i003)

###### Inter-rater agreement of quality assessment by using Cohen\'s kappa analysis

![](kjod-48-395-i004)

Kappa score = 0.728.

###### Association of the risk of external apical root resorption with the interleukin 1B (+3954) polymorphism

![](kjod-48-395-i005)

OR, Odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

###### Test of heterogeneity among the studies

![](kjod-48-395-i006)

^\*^*p*-value for Q statistics.

###### Publication bias among the studies

![](kjod-48-395-i007)
