1. Introduction {#sec1}
===============

Yerba mate (*Ilex paraguariensis*), a traditional crop, is known as one of the most popular beverages in Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay \[[@B17]\]. As a nonalcoholic beverage favoured by South Americans \[[@B30]\], yerba mate provides a great number of bioactive compounds for nutritional and medicinal applications. On account of its alleged therapeutic capacity, yerba mate is found to have hypocholesterolemic, hepatoprotective, and diuretic properties and can resist against the deleterious effect of free radicals, thus boosting the defense system of organisms \[[@B8]--[@B24]\]. Furthermore, it can as well improve the cardiovascular system in a human body \[[@B27]--[@B32]\].

Polyphenols (chlorogenic acid) and xanthines (caffeine and theobromine) rank the top 2 places in the sorting by the level of active phytochemicals contained in yerba mate tea \[[@B24], [@B12]\]. The antioxidant activity of the phenolic compounds is mainly due to the redox properties thereof, which enable them to serve as good reducing agents \[[@B1]\]. The considerable antioxidant potential of yerba mate has long been recognized and shows dependence on many factors involved in tea preparation.

Various processing procedures of plant leaves will result in different tea qualities \[[@B16]--[@B15]\]. There are a number of published studies on the effect of aqueous infusion on yerba mate tea. Isolabella et al. \[[@B17]\] and Valerga et al. \[[@B33]\] made an investigation into compound variation during each step of its industrial process. Linares et al. \[[@B23]\] studied the temperature influence on the aqueous infusion of yerba mate. In contrast, ion effects on aqueous infusion of yerba mate have rarely been described. According to previous reports on green tea \[[@B37], [@B3]\], elements of water are presumed to have some influence on yerba mate tea.

In consideration of the demand growth and potential health benefits from drinking yerba mate tea, this study is proposed to quantize the ion effects on the dissolution of yerba mate extract powders. Comparisons are conducted on the contents of major bioactive components and the antioxidant activities of yerba mate tea prepared by two water sources. Results of this study shed light on the effect of yerba mate tea preparation toward a better understanding of the tea quality in its final presentation.

2. Materials and Methods {#sec2}
========================

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents {#sec2.1}
---------------------------

Panted Finomate EFLA 920 yerba mate extract was purchased from Frutarom Switzerland Ltd., Wädenswil, Switzerland. Folin-Ciocalteu reagent was from Fluka (Neu-Ulm, Germany). Iron(III) chloride was from Riedel-de Haen (Seelze, Germany). Tannic acid, caffeine, sodium carbonate, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) were from Sigma (St. Louis, USA). Potassium persulfate was from Showa Chemical Co. (Tokyo, Japan). Potassium ferricyanide (K~3~Fe(CN)~6~) was from JT Baker (Phillipsburg, USA). Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (HPLC grade) and phosphoric acid (HPLC grade) were from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Methanol and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

2.2. Processing of Yerba Mate Tea {#sec2.2}
---------------------------------

Yerba mate tea solutions were prepared at 25°C by dissolving yerba mate extract powders into tap water and deionized water, respectively. The former was taken from the suburban area of the Greater Taichung area, Taiwan. Deionized water was purified with a Milli-Q water system (Millipore, Bedford, USA). Yerba mate tea was prepared by dissolving different amounts of dry yerba mate extract powders in 25 mL water. Three replicates were made in each experiment for statistical analysis.

2.3. Total Phenol Content {#sec2.3}
-------------------------

Total phenol content of the yerba mate tea was estimated by a colorimetric assay based on the procedure described by Kumazawa et al. \[[@B22]\]. The 0.1 mL of yerba mate tea solution (100\~500 ppm) was mixed with 0.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent for a duration of 1 minute and 0.5 mL of 2% sodium carbonate for 20 minutes. The absorbance at 655 nm (Sunrise ELISA plate reader, Tecan, Austria) increases with the total phenol content.

2.4. Reducing Power {#sec2.4}
-------------------

The reducing power of yerba mate tea was examined using a mixture of 1 mL of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6), 1 mL of potassium ferricyanide (1% by weight), and 1 mL of tested sample \[[@B29]\]. The mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 minutes, and a 1 mL volume of TCA (1% by weight) was then added to the mixture. The TCA-reacted solution (0.4 mL) was mixed with deionized water (0.5 mL) and FeCl~3~ (1 mL, 0.1% by weight) for 10 minutes, and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm.

Relative reducing power (%) is defined as relative reducing power = (*A*/*B*) × 100, where *A* denotes the sample absorbance and *B* the absorbance of 0.5 mg/mL BHA.

2.5. DPPH Scavenging Activity {#sec2.5}
-----------------------------

The DPPH scavenging ability assay was prepared as in Zhang and Wang \[[@B36]\]. A 0.1 mL of sample was mixed with 1.0 mL of 0.25 mM DPPH and 0.4 mL of ethanol, incubated for 30 minutes in the dark. When DPPH reacted with an antioxidant that can donate hydrogen, it appeared in reduced form and resulted in an absorbance drop at 517 nm (Sunrise ELISA plate reader, Tecan, Austria). The DPPH scavenging activity is defined as follows: $$\begin{matrix}
{\text{DPPH}{\,\,}\text{scavenging}{\,\,}\text{activity}{\,\,}\left( \% \right)} \\
{\quad = \left( {1 - \frac{A_{517}{\,\,}\text{of}{\,\,}\text{sample}}{A_{517}{\,\,}\text{of}{\,\,}\text{control}}} \right) \times 100,} \\
\end{matrix}$$ where the control denotes the water not containing yerba mate tea.

2.6. ABTS^+^•**  **Scavenging Capacity {#sec2.6}
--------------------------------------

The ABTS^+^•**  **scavenging capacity assay was carried out using the procedure described in Erkan et al.\'s method \[[@B7]\]. In brief, ABTS^+^•**  **was generated by the reaction of 7 mM of ABTS with 2.45 mM of potassium persulfate in the dark for 16 hours at 4°C. The 10 *μ*L of yerba mate tea sample was added to 2 mL of ABTS^+^•**  **radical solution, for a reaction time of 10 minutes. Given the absorbance at 734 nm, the ABTS^+^•**  **radical scavenging activity is defined as $$\begin{matrix}
{\text{ABTS}^{+} \bullet {\,\,}\text{radical}{\,\,}\text{scavenging}{\,\,}\left( \% \right)} \\
{\quad = \left( {1 - \frac{A_{734}{\,\,}\text{of}{\,\,}\text{sample}}{A_{734}{\,\,}\text{of}{\,\,}\text{control}}} \right) \times 100,} \\
\end{matrix}$$ where the control represents the water not containing yerba mate tea.

2.7. High Performance Liquid Chromatography {#sec2.7}
-------------------------------------------

Each extracted yerba mate tea sample was mixed (1 : 1, v/v) with a gallic acid solution (internal standard, 20 mg/L in 70% methanol). Subsequently, all the samples were spiked with various concentrations of stock solutions (theobromine: 3.125, 3.57, 4.17, 8.33, and 12.5 *μ*g/mL; chlorogenic acid: 7.143, 8.33, 10, 16.67, and 25 *μ*g/mL; caffeine: 5, 6.25, 8.33, 10, and 15.625 *μ*g/mL) in advance of the HPLC analysis. A 20 *μ*L of these solutions was injected twice by the HPLC method, respectively, and the standard curves were plotted according to the peak areas versus concentrations. Recovery was determined by the comparison between the amounts of marker-substances added and found. The detection limits arise from a minimum signal to noise (*S*/*N*) ratio of 3. The HPLC system (Agilent 1200 infinity series, Agilent, USA) is equipped with a quaternary pump, an autosampler, a vacuum degasser, and a diode array detector. A reverse phase column (Cosmosil 5C18-AR II, 5 *μ*m, 25 cm × 4.6 mm I.D., Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) was used. The mobile phase was a mixture of A (10 mM KH~2~PO~4~, pH 4.0) and B \[CH~3~CN : CH~3~OH : H~2~O = 1.5 : 2.5 : 1 (v/v/v)\]. The initial mobile phase composition was 20% of B. After 20 min, the mobile phase composition turned into 30% of B. After 40 min, the mobile phase composition further turned into 50% of B. The flow rate was 0.8 mL/min. The detector was operated at a detection wavelength of 280 nm.

3. Results and Discussion {#sec3}
=========================

3.1. Solution Appearance {#sec3.1}
------------------------

[Figure 1](#fig1){ref-type="fig"} indicates the appearance of yerba mate tea solution placed in quartz cuvettes. As such, the color darkens as the concentration of yerba mate tea rises. A concentrated solution (500 ppm, C and D in [Figure 1](#fig1){ref-type="fig"}) demonstrates a deeper color than a diluted one (100 ppm, A and B in [Figure 1](#fig1){ref-type="fig"}). At the same level of tea concentration, yerba mate tea prepared with tap water shows a darker orange color than prepared with deionized water. The color difference is presumed to reflect ion chelation with the composition of yerba mate tea.

For a further investigation into the color difference between yerba mate teas prepared with different water sources, the issue of dissolution of tannic acid, a compound contained in yerba mate tea is addressed. [Figure 2](#fig2){ref-type="fig"} shows the color comparison between the tannic acid solutions prepared with tap water and deionized water. There is a deeper color in the tap water than in the deionized water case, an event that may be attributed to the ion chelating between tannic acid and metal ions in tap water.

3.2. Total Phenol Content {#sec3.2}
-------------------------

Phenols are regarded as the significant constituents of yerba mate tea, and the concentration thereof is directly proportional to the absorbance at 655 nm (*A* ~655~) in Folin-Ciocalteu reaction. [Figure 3](#fig3){ref-type="fig"} is a plot of *A* ~655~ versus the yerba mate tea concentration, where the yerba mate tea concentration is directly reflected by the total phenol contents. Yet, there is little difference in *A* ~635~ between the tap water and the deionized water cases, meaning that the total phenol content is marginally affected by the choice of water sources.

3.3. Reducing Power {#sec3.3}
-------------------

The reducing power of a compound is seen as a measure of antioxidant activity. [Figure 4](#fig4){ref-type="fig"} exhibits the reducing power comparison between both test cases. A 0.5 mg/mL BHA solution was used as a reference in the reducing power measurement. As it turns out, there is a nearly linear relationship between the reducing power and tea concentration, even at a tea concentration of 500 ppm (72.4 ± 9.8% versus 76.38 ± 9.27%), and a good agreement between both samples.

3.4. DPPH Scavenging Activity {#sec3.4}
-----------------------------

As a stable free radical compound, DPPH has been widely adopted as a measure of free radical scavenging activity. This reduction can be monitored at 517 nm by measuring the bleaching of a violet DPPH solution. [Figure 5](#fig5){ref-type="fig"} shows the DPPH radical scavenging activity of yerba mate tea. There is a dose-dependent relationship between the DPPH scavenging activity and the concentration of yerba mate tea and a high consistency between both test samples over the while observation. Respective 50% DPPH radical scavenging activities (IC~50~) are observed at tea concentrations of 413 and 411 ppm in the tap water and the deionized water cases. Hence, the DPPH scavenging activity shows no dependence on the ion concentrations of water.

3.5. ABTS^+^•**  **Scavenging Activity {#sec3.5}
--------------------------------------

ABTS^+^•**  **scavenging activity is another indicator used to test antioxidant activity of yerba mate tea. [Figure 6](#fig6){ref-type="fig"} reveals a dose-dependent ABTS^+^•**  **radicals scavenging activity for yerba mate tea. ABTS^+^•**  **radicals were inhibited by 19.97 ± 0.94% and 21.64 ± 2.31% at a tea concentration of 500 ppm in the tap water and the deionized water cases, respectively. As the DPPH scavenging activity was discussed in the preceding section, results in [Figure 6](#fig6){ref-type="fig"} demonstrate no dependence on the choice of water sources.

3.6. High Performance Liquid Chromatography {#sec3.6}
-------------------------------------------

As a prerequisite for the establishment of calibration curves, the peak-area ratios are plotted against the tea concentrations. All the regression lines were linear over the concentration range of interest, that is, *y* = 57.9903*x* + 0.0296  (*R* ^2^ = 0.9983) for theobromine, *y* = 97.442*x* + 0.0525  (*R* ^2^ = 0.9998) for chlorogenic acid, and *y* = 120.15*x* + 0.0787  (*R* ^2^ = 0.9941) for caffeine. The respective detection limits (*S*/*N* = 3) for the components were 0.357 (theobromine), 0.714 (chorogenic acid), and 0.412 (caffeine) *μ*g/mL. Appropriate amounts of marker substances (theobromine, 6.25 *μ*g/mL, chorogenic acid, 12.5 *μ*g/mL, and caffeine, 12.5 *μ*g/mL) were added to a sample containing a known content and the mixtures were then analyzed by the proposed HPLC approach. The recoveries of the components are sorted in descending order, that is, 104.69, 99.09 and 91.06% for theobromine, chorogenic acid and caffeine, respectively.

Substituting the peak-area ratios of the individual peaks for *y* in the above-stated equations gives the contents of the individual components in the yerba mate tea. Tabulated in [Table 1](#tab1){ref-type="table"} was a comparison of the average amounts of the three aforementioned constituents contained in samples between both water cases. It is found that both cases contain comparable amounts of constituents.

Previous studies reported that mineralisation of water hindered tea leaves extraction of organic matter due to the complex formation \[[@B26], [@B14]\]. The work presents an investigation into the influence of water ions on the dissolution of yerba mate extract powders. Unlike the extractions of organic matters from tea leaves, the research findings indicate little differences in the compositions as well as the functional characteristics between yerba mate teas prepared by dissolving yerba mate extract powders into tap water and deionized water.

4. Conclusions {#sec4}
==============

A difference in color appearance is seen between yerba mate teas prepared with tap water solution and deionized water. The deep color in a tap water case may be attributed to the ion chelating between tannic acid and metal ions contained in tap water. Analysis of high performance liquid chromatography and antioxidant experiments, including total phenol content, reducing power, DPPH scavenging activity, and ABTS^+^•**  **scavenging activity, reveals that yerba mate teas contain identical compositions and provide the same level of antioxidant activities irrespective of the choice of water sources. This finding can be useful for the processing of yerba mate.

This work was supported by a grant from National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC 102-2632-B-241-001-MY3).

Conflict of Interests
=====================

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. All the authors have no financial relation with the commercial identities mentioned in the paper.

![Color appearance comparison between yerba mate tea solutions. A and C are prepared with tap water and B and D are with deionized water. A and B have a tea concentration of 100 ppm while C and D have 500 ppm.](TSWJ2014-768742.001){#fig1}

![Color comparison between tannic acid solutions at a 250 ppm concentration prepared with tap water (A) and deionized water (B).](TSWJ2014-768742.002){#fig2}

![Comparison of the total phenol content versus the concentration of yerba mate tea.](TSWJ2014-768742.003){#fig3}

![Comparison of the reducing power versus the concentration of yerba mate tea.](TSWJ2014-768742.004){#fig4}

![Comparison of the DPPH scavenging activity versus the concentration of yerba mate tea.](TSWJ2014-768742.005){#fig5}

![Comparison of the ABTS^+^•**  **scavenging activity versus the concentration of yerba mate tea.](TSWJ2014-768742.006){#fig6}

###### 

Three major components contained in yerba mate teas prepared with distinct water solutions.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Water solution    Theobromine\     Chlorogenic acid\   Caffeine\
                    (mg/g)           (mg/g)              (mg/g)
  ----------------- ---------------- ------------------- ----------------
  Deionized water   45.873 ± 0.660   58.186 ± 0.542      43.865 ± 2.486

  Tap water         48.403 ± 0.845   58.018 ± 1.161      45.180 ± 0.829
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

[^1]: Academic Editors: A. Berthod and A. Sabarudin
