FDA Status: Not Applicable

**Summary:** Circumferential arthroscopic labral reconstruction is a viable option for patients with missing or severely compromised labral tissue with comparable results to those with less challenging hip problems.

**Title:** Circumferential Acetabular Labral Reconstruction Provides Equivalent Improvement to Labral Repair Despite Greater Initial Severity of Damage at Two-Year Follow-up

**Introduction:** In settings where the labral tissue is damaged beyond repair by either previous surgery or as a sequela of the patient's underlying hip pathology, a labral reconstruction that biomechanical and limited clinical studies have shown to be a viable alternative to an extensive debridement leaving a segmental defect or a suboptimal repair. A circumferential labral reconstruction (CLR) with ITB allograft between the transverse acetabular ligament antero-inferiorly to the 7-8 o'clock position postero-inferiorly eliminates any high stress junction points, tissue damaged beyond repair and restores stability.

**Materials & Methods:** We retrospectively examined 46 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery of the hip with circumferential labral reconstruction with a fascia lata allograft for labral and compared them with 61 consecutive patients undergoing labral repair during the same period. Pre- and post-op surveys included Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS), International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT-12), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Hip Outcome Score (HOS-ADL and HOS-SSS). Severity of labral damage was evaluated in separate sidearm study of 20 patient videos not involved in current study to assess intra-observer reliability for grading of severity of labral damage.

**Results:** The mean age of the reconstruction patients was 43.2 vs. 30.4 for the repair patients (p \< 0.05). The repair group had 45% mild and 55% moderate tears; the reconstruction group had 80% severe tears or segmental defects and 20% moderate tears. 3.9% of the repair group were revision procedures, while 35% of the reconstruction group were revision procedures. Follow-up rate was 91%. One patient underwent subsequent total hip arthroplasty, and another underwent a core muscle injury procedure in the reconstruction group. In the reconstruction group, the mean Pain VAS score decreased from 4.83 preoperatively to 2.31 postoperatively (P \< 0.001), IHOT-12 scores increased from 37.04 to 62.552 (P \< 0.001), and mHHS increased from 53.81 to 75.31 (P = 0.0017). The SF-12 survey exhibited an increase from 36.29 to 43.15 (P = 0.028), HOS-ADL scores increased from 62.692 to 86.07 (P \< 0.001), and HOS-SSS scores increased from 40.65 to 60.83 (P = 0.0028). These improvements were not statistically different from those observed in the repair group (Pain VAS: P = 0.538; HOS-ADL: P = 0.226; HOS-SSS: P = 0.374; mHHS: P = 0.124; IHOT: P = 0.783; SF: P = 0.642). Intra-observer reliability of sidearm video study Kappa = 0.66 indicating moderately good reliability in the grading of severity of labral damage.

**Discussion & Conclusion:** The current study shows that patients undergoing circumferential labral reconstruction with ITB allograft exhibit favorable outcome at 2 years postoperatively with respect to pain and activities of daily living---comparable to the results achieved in patients undergoing repairs of labra with lower severity of damage in a more challenging patient population (13 yrs older with far worse labral damage). These data suggest that circumferential arthroscopic labral reconstruction is a viable option for patients with missing or severely compromised labral tissue.
