Introduction
============

The most commonly used materials for bone implants are metals (such as titanium, Ti) and polymers (such as ultra high molecular weight polyethylene). Numerous problems exist with these implants such as (i) insufficient prolonged bonding between the implanted material and juxtaposed bone ([@b9-ijn-3-391], [@b10-ijn-3-391]; [@b2-ijn-3-391]; [@b21-ijn-3-391]), (ii) different mechanical properties between bone and the implant leading to stress shielding ([@b9-ijn-3-391], [@b10-ijn-3-391]; [@b21-ijn-3-391]), and (iii) wear debris generated at articulating surfaces of orthopedic implants that may lead to cell death ([@b9-ijn-3-391], [@b10-ijn-3-391]). It has been speculated that nano-structured materials can increase orthopedic implant efficacy since it is well known that the nanometer scale is the length scale that most of the body's natural materials possess. For example, hydroxyapatite, the major inorganic component of bone, exists predominantly as platelet-or rod-shape crystals about 2--5 nm in width and 50 nm in length. Type I collagen, the major organic component of bone, has fibrils 300 nm in length, 0.5 nm in width, and has a periodicity of 67 nm ([@b14-ijn-3-391]). Therefore, it is reasonable to consider that osteoblasts (or bone-forming cells) will be more accustomed to nano-structured surfaces compared to currently used nano-smooth implant surfaces.

Such problems with promoting new bone growth next to implant surfaces are made only more complex for patients with bone cancer (both primary bone cancer and metastasized bone cancers). For example, it is estimated that 2,380 people will be diagnosed with bone and joint cancers and 1,470 people will die from primary bone and joint cancers in 2008 in the US ([@b1-ijn-3-391]). Primary bone cancer is rare but bone cancer as a result of the metastasis from other organs (such as the lungs, breasts and the prostate) is very common ([@b12-ijn-3-391]). Thus, the number of patients affiliated with bone cancer is much higher when considering the statistics of cancer metastasis. For these reasons, the main goal of this study was to introduce a new biomaterial naturally found in the human body that has chemopreventive properties for orthopedic implants: elemental selenium. The first goal in this effort was to create nano-structured roughness on such materials and to determine bone cell responses on such nano-structured selenium materials.

Materials and methods
=====================

Selenium shots (amorphous, metals basis, spherical and/or semi-spherical 2--4 mm in diameter; Alfa Asear, Ward Hill, MA) were pressed into cylindrical compacts (0.635 cm radius and 0.2 cm thickness) at 1000 psi for 2 minutes using a uniaxial compacting hydraulic press (Carver, Inc., Wabash, IN). The compacts were then chemically treated with 1N NaOH for either 10 or 30 min. After etching, selenium compacts were washed with excessive deionized water to remove the NaOH that remained on the selenium compacts. Titanium substrates (Alfa Aesar) were used as controls.

Surfaces of untreated selenium compacts as well as selenium compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 10 and 30 min were visualized (without a conductive coating) using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, LEO 1530VP FE-4800) with an accelerating voltage from 3 to 10 kV. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, LEO 1530) was used to determine the surface chemistry of the compacts.

To investigate osteoblast adhesion on selenium compacts, human osteoblast-like cells (bone-forming cells; CRL-11372 American Type of Culture Collection, population numbers 14--15) in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Hyclone) were seeded at a density of 3500 cells/cm^2^ and placed in an incubator under standard cell culture conditions (37°C, 5% CO~2~, 95% humidified air) for 24 h. Importantly, this is an immortalized cell line which has been used widely in experiments involving orthopedic applications since previous studies have demonstrated that when cultured under similar conditions as described in the present study, these cells secrete bone-related proteins and deposit calcium containing mineral ([@b12-ijn-3-391]). The cells were then fixed using 4% formaldehyde (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma) and counted under fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Axiovert 200M Light Microscope) in five random fields which were averaged for each compact. Cell experiments were conducted in triplicate and repeated three times. Data were collected and statistical comparisons were assessed using a one-tailed Student t-test.

Results and discussion
======================

The SEM images of the selenium compacts (untreated and treated with NaOH for different time periods) revealed various surface roughness. Untreated surfaces ([Figure 1](#f1-ijn-3-391){ref-type="fig"} image A) possessed mostly micron rough surface features while those treated with 1N NaOH for different time periods created submicron ([Figure 1](#f1-ijn-3-391){ref-type="fig"} image B) and nano-rough ([Figure 1](#f1-ijn-3-391){ref-type="fig"} image C) surface features on selenium. In particular, biologically inspired surface roughness increased with increasing NaOH treatment time periods. As the etchant, NaOH is believed to dissolve the oxide layer on the surface of the selenium compacts creating submicron and nanometer features at increasing times.

Chemical etching is a very common, inexpensive, and simple method used to modify the surface properties (eg, topography, chemistry, roughness, wettability, etc.) of biomaterials. Chemical etching can be used for a wide range of biomaterials from metals, ceramics, to polymers. For example, etching titanium with HCl followed by NaOH has led to the formation of uniform micrometer featured surfaces that increased the formation of hydroxycarbonated apatite when exposed to a simulated body fluid ([@b8-ijn-3-391]). Moreover, etching poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) films using NaOH has created biologically inspired nanometer surface feature dimensions to promote the functions of numerous cells. For example, this nanometer PLGA structured surface was shown to promote bladder smooth muscle cell functions compared to conventional, micrometer-structured PLGA after 1, 3, and 5 days of culture ([@b17-ijn-3-391]). In addition, Feldspathic porcelain etched in 5% hydrofluoric acid was shown to promote the bonding strength between orthodontic brackets and ceramic crowns when compared to those treated by mechanical roughening with fine diamond burs or sandblasting ([@b16-ijn-3-391]). Clearly, chemical etching can be an inexpensive effective way to transform nano-smooth surfaces into nano-rough surfaces for a wide range of materials to promote their biological performance.

Importantly, EDS profiles of the compacts used in the present study revealed that the chemistry of the selenium compacts remained unaffected after treatment in 1N NaOH ([Figure 2](#f2-ijn-3-391){ref-type="fig"}). Moreover, [Table 1](#t1-ijn-3-391){ref-type="table"} lists the weight percentages of selenium and sodium for each compact. The results showed trace amounts of sodium on the surfaces of selenium compacts treated with 1N NaOH. This indicated that chemical etching (ie, using 1N NaOH for up to 30 min) only changed the surface roughness, not the surface chemistry of the selenium compacts. The ability to change an implant's surface roughness and/or topography without altering its chemistry is of great interest since, when fabricating implant materials, it is crucial not to induce any potential harmful chemistry changes. In this study, selenium compact chemistry remained unaltered after treatment with 1N NaOH for up to 30 min.

When these substrates were used as substrates for culturing osteoblasts, after 1 day, significantly increased cell densities were observed on the increasing nano-rough surfaces (ie, compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 10 and 30 min) ([Figures 3](#f3-ijn-3-391){ref-type="fig"}, [4](#f4-ijn-3-391){ref-type="fig"}). Especially, the compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 30 min, which had the largest amount of nanometer surface features, had the highest osteoblast density. However, although closer, these selenium compacts (ie, compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 30 min) had osteoblast densities lower than that of titanium. Future studies will need to utilize greater times and/or concentrations of NaOH etching to determine if osteoblast adhesion can be matched between selenium and titanium. Moreover, future studies will need to examine primary osteoblast cells (since that was not accomplished here) as well as the multitude of cancerous cells that can cause bone cancer.

It has been shown that increased nanometer surface roughness promotes osteoblast functions (from adhesion to the deposition of calcium containing mineral) ([@b18-ijn-3-391], [@b19-ijn-3-391], [@b20-ijn-3-391]; [@b21-ijn-3-391]; [@b23-ijn-3-391]). The results of this study showed a similar trend of increased healthy osteoblast densities after 1 day of culture on selenium with increased nanometer surface roughness.

The significance of these results is also the introduction of a new chemistry to the orthopedic community particularly geared at inhibiting bone cancer regrowth: selenium. Selenium has been shown to have chemo-preventive effects in numerous reports ([@b5-ijn-3-391]; [@b3-ijn-3-391], [@b4-ijn-3-391]; [@b6-ijn-3-391]; [@b13-ijn-3-391]; [@b26-ijn-3-391]; [@b24-ijn-3-391]). However, the mechanisms of selenium-based chemoprevention are complex and incompletely understood ([@b7-ijn-3-391]). By imparting nano features onto selenium compacts, the objective of this study was to create a material that promotes healthy osteoblast functions since evidence has already been provided concerning its role in inhibiting cancer growth. In the present study, healthy osteoblast adhesion was shown to be enhanced on nano-rough selenium compacts when compared to micro-rough selenium compacts. The reasons why nano-roughness enhances osteoblast functions remains incompletely understood. However, it has been shown that nano-roughness effectively increased the initial absorption of proteins (such as fibronectin and vitronectin) which mediate subsequent cell adhesion ([@b20-ijn-3-391], [@b22-ijn-3-391]; [@b11-ijn-3-391]). In particular, particle boundaries on other material (Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo) surfaces were shown to be active regions for such protein adsorption ([@b23-ijn-3-391]). Nano-structured surfaces clearly offer more particle boundaries when compared to micron-structured surfaces for promoting initial protein adsorption events.

In another recent study, elemental selenium nanoclusters were coated on conventional titanium substrates to create nano-structured surfaces. These surfaces were shown to promote healthy osteoblast functions after 1 day of culture and, importantly, inhibit cancerous osteoblast cell functions after 3 days of culture ([@b15-ijn-3-391]). In the present study, nano-structured selenium surfaces were created by a different method: chemically etching selenium bulk compacts. The approach used in this study is simpler than the coating method used (which involved selenium chemical precipitation) and can eliminate the influence of titanium in the interaction with osteoblasts since selenium coatings in that previous study did not completely cover the underlying titanium. However, considering the toxicity of selenium at high levels ([@b25-ijn-3-391]), the use of selenium compacts may be problematic concerning how much selenium is exposed to the body leading to possible toxic effects. Future studies need to clearly investigate this possible toxicity as well as cancerous bone cell functions on these selenium compacts.

Conclusions
===========

This study provided techniques to create nano-structured roughness without altering chemistry on selenium compacts for anti-cancer orthopedic applications. Since previous studies have shown greater osteoblast functions on nano-structured compared to conventional ceramics, metals, polymers, and composites, the ability to create nano-structured roughness on selenium compacts is promising for increasing bone cell functions, while inhibiting the return of bone cancer.

The authors would like to thank Mr. Anthony McCormick for help with SEM and Mr. Chang Yao for help with cell experiments. The authors would also like to thank the Herman Foundation for funding. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

![SEM images of an untreated selenium compact (A) and selenium compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 10 min (B) and 30 min (C).\
**Note:** Bars = 1 micrometer.](ijn-3-391f1){#f1-ijn-3-391}

![EDS profiles of (A) untreated selenium compacts and (B) selenium compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 10 min and (C) 30 min.](ijn-3-391f2){#f2-ijn-3-391}

![Fluorescence microscopy images of osteoblasts on: (A) Untreated selenium compacts; (B) selenium compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 10 min; (C) selenium compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 30 min; and Titanium (Ti) substrates.\
**Note:** Time = 24 h.](ijn-3-391f3){#f3-ijn-3-391}

![Increased osteoblast densities on selenium compacts with greater amounts of nanosurface features after 24 h of culturing. (A) Untreated selenium compacts; (B) selenium compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 10 min; and (C) selenium compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 30 min.\
**Notes:** Data = Mean ± SEM; N = 3; \*p \< 0.05 compared to untreated substrate; \*\*p \< 0.05 compared to compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 10 min. \*\*\*p \< 0.01 compared to compacts treated with 1N NaOH for 30 min.](ijn-3-391f4){#f4-ijn-3-391}

###### 

Weight percentages of selenium (Se) and Na on Se compact surfaces[\*](#tfn1-ijn-3-391){ref-type="table-fn"}

  Se compacts                       Weight % of Se   Weight % of Na
  --------------------------------- ---------------- ----------------
  Untreated                         99.94            0.06
  Treated with 1N NaOH for 10 min   99.82            0.18
  Treated with 1N NaOH for 30 min   99.72            0.28

**Note:** Data not statistically different.
