article: Chuck Erickson has been shooting deer for forty years. "The kids start hunting round here about the age of eight - supervised by an adult of course," he tells me. Chuck uses his late father's old hunting rifle. Chuck is 56; the gun is older than he is. He's killed dozens of deer with it over the decades, and the heads of the finest antlered bucks are displayed on the walls of his farmhouse. "We used to hunt for meat," he says, "but now we're mostly trophy hunters." He thinks around 30% of the population in this part of the state get out into the woods to hunt deer at this time of year. This is Donald Trump country now - blue collar, plain-speaking, patriotic. It is a short drive from Chuck's farm to the former steel city of Johnstown. As you pass through its outskirts you see streets of boarded up houses. The city centre is scarred by the derelict buildings of a once great industry. This is steel and coal territory. But those industries were swept away in the age of global markets and open borders. Donald Trump promised to reverse that dereliction and bring industry back to America. "We have the best steel-making coal and there's none getting out of the ground," Chuck told me. "That process to make steel can come back to our shores and that would be tremendous for everybody. "I think he [Donald Trump] can probably bring that back in the first hundred days of his administration." He believes that the Trump victory is the start of the re-industrialisation of the United States. Mr Trump's promise to build barriers to reverse this long industrial decline is a retreat to economic nationalism, to protectionism. It turns the page on a forty-year western economic orthodoxy - the liberal market consensus of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. And Donald Trump's victory finds its British echo in the vote, in June, to leave the European Union. In the old industrial heartlands of England and Wales, traditional Labour voters defied their party's advice and voted decisively for the Leave side. The economic revolution that both the US and the UK went through in the 1980s did make both countries richer, in the sense that aggregate wealth grew. It wasn't supposed to matter that that new wealth would be unevenly shared, that inequality would also grow, because wealth at the top would trickle down; a rising economic tide would lift all boats. But not all boats were lifted. There is an irony in this: that the two countries which pursued the deregulating, globalising, free-market reform agenda most vigorously are now the first two countries to have rebelled against open borders. Ferdinand Mount was a senior adviser to Margaret Thatcher in the early part of her premiership. He ran the Number 10 Policy Unit at the time of the 1983 general election - the second of the three that she won. "It was a transatlantic borrowing really," he told me. "It was Ronald Reagan who believed that a rising tide would lift
summary: In late November, in the forests of Western Pennsylvania, the deer hunting season begins.