What movement is David Yerushalmi behind that would prohibit the implementation of Islanic law in courts in any civil jurisdiction?
anti-sharia movement
Ban on sharia law
A ban on sharia law is legislation that would prohibit the application or implementation of Islamic law (sharia) in courts in any civil (non-religious) jurisdiction.
 In the United States, various states have "banned Sharia law", or passed some kind of ballot measure that "prohibits the states courts from considering foreign, international or religious law."
 s of 2014 these include Alabama, Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Dakota and Tennessee.
.
 In Canada, Sharia law is explicitly banned in Quebec, upheld by a unanimous vote against it in 2005 by the National Assembly, while the province of Ontario allows family law disputes to be arbitrated only under Ontario law.
David Yerushalmi
David Yerushalmi (born 1956) is an American lawyer and political activist who is the driving counsel behind the anti-sharia movement in the United States.
 Along with Robert Muise, he is co-founder and senior counsel of the American Freedom Law Center.
 He is also general counsel to the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C., a national security think tank founded by Frank Gaffney.
Montana District Courts
Montana District Courts are the state trial courts of general jurisdiction in the U.S. state of Montana.
 Montana District Courts have original jurisdiction over most civil cases (at law and in equity), civil actions involving monetary claims against the state, criminal felony cases, naturalization proceedings, probate cases, and most writs.
 They may also hear certain special actions and proceedings, and oversee a narrowly-defined class of ballot issues.
 Montana District Courts also have limited appellate jurisdiction regarding cases that arise in Justice Courts, City Courts, and Municipal Courts (Courts of Limited Jurisdiction) as well as Judicial review of decisions by state administrative law tribunals that fall under the Montana Administrative Procedures Act. Spanish Courts for Violence against Women
The Courts for Violence Against Women (Spanish: "Juzgados de Violencia Sobre la Mujer" ) are Specialised criminal courtrooms associated to the Inquiry Courts, established by the Organic Law 1/2004 of Comprehensive Protection Measures against Violence against women.
 Extraordinarily these courts also have powers in the civil jurisdiction acting as Courts of First Instance and Inquiry.
 They are associated to the Judicial District, even though one court can be created to cover the area of two or more districts. Manorial court
The manorial courts were the lowest courts of law in England during the feudal period.
 They had a civil jurisdiction limited both in subject matter and geography.
 They dealt with matters over which the lord of the manor had jurisdiction, primarily torts, local contracts and land tenure, and their powers only extended to those who lived within the lands of the manor: the demesne and such lands as the lord had enfeoffed to others, and to those who held land therein.
 Historians have divided manorial courts into those that were primarily seignorial – based on feudal responsibilities – and those based on separate delegation of authority from the monarch.
 There were three types of manorial court: the court of the honour; the court baron; and the court customary, also known as the halmote court. Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty
The Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT) is a proposed international treaty to prohibit the further production of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other explosive devices.
 The treaty has not been negotiated and its terms remain to be defined.
 According to a proposal by the United States, fissile material includes high-enriched uranium and plutonium (except plutonium that is over 80% Pu-238).
 According to a proposal by Russia, fissile material would be limited to weapons-grade uranium (with more than 90% U-235) and plutonium (with more than 90% Pu-239).
 Neither proposal would prohibit the production of fissile material for non-weapons purposes, including use in civil or naval nuclear reactors. Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982
The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (c.27) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which was passed to implement the Brussels Convention of 1968 into British law.
 As well as governing whether the Courts of England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland have jurisdiction to hear cases against defendants in other contracting states, the Act provided a statutory basis for the division of jurisdiction between the three jurisdictions within the UK.
 No provision was made in 1982 for division of jurisdiction between the UK and Gibraltar; this was rectified by the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (Gibraltar) Order 1997 which stated that, for the purposes of the 1982 Act, Gibraltar should be treated as a separate contracting state. Virginia Circuit Court
The Virginia Circuit Courts are the state trial courts of general jurisdiction in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
 The Circuit Courts have jurisdiction to hear civil and criminal cases.
 For civil cases, the courts have authority to try cases with an amount in controversy of more than $4,500 and have exclusive original jurisdiction over claims for more than $25,000.
 In criminal matters, the Circuit Courts are the trial courts for all felony charges and for misdemeanors originally charged there.
 The Circuit Courts also have appellate jurisdiction for any case from the Virginia General District Courts (the trial courts of limited jurisdiction in Virginia) claiming more than $50, which are tried "de novo" in the Circuit Courts. Primary Courts of Sri Lanka
The Primary Courts in Sri Lanka is a lower court and are the courts of first instance.
 There are seven Primary Courts, located in Anamaduwa, Angunukolapelessa, Kandy, Mallakam, Pilessa, Wellawaya and Wennappuwa.
 In the other divisions, the Magistrate's Courts exercise the jurisdiction of the Primary Courts.
 The Primary Courts have criminal and civil Jurisdiction. Judicial system of Singapore
The full Judicial power in Singapore is vested in the Supreme Court as well as subordinate courts by the Constitution of Singapore.
 The Supreme Court consists of the Court of Appeal and the High Court.
 The Court of Appeal exercises appellate criminal and civil jurisdiction, while the High Court exercises both original and appellate criminal and civil jurisdiction.
 The Chief Justice, Judges of Appeal, Judicial Commissioners and High Court Judges are appointed by the President from candidates recommended by the Prime Minister.
 The prime minister must consult with the Chief Justice before recommending the judges.
 The current Chief Justice is Sundaresh Menon.