Paul v. Clinton was a civil suit filed in 2004 with a plaintiff whose former occupations were what?
lawyer and entrepreneur
Peter F. Paul
Peter Franklin Paul (born September 2, 1948) is a former lawyer and entrepreneur who was convicted for conspiracy and drug dealing, and later for securities fraud in connection with his business dealings with "Spider-Man" co-creator Stan Lee.
 He has repeatedly brought suit against Hillary Clinton, accusing her of lying about donations he solicited on behalf of her 2000 senatorial campaign.
Paul v. Clinton
Paul v. Clinton was a civil suit filed in 2004 held in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
 The plaintiff, Peter F. Paul, alleged that President Bill Clinton and his wife, First Lady Hillary Clinton, deceived him into paying for the Gala Hollywood Farewell Salute to President Clinton, during Hillary Clinton's first Senate race in 2000, by making a promise that the President would work for Paul's company, Stan Lee Media, after his presidential term was over.
 Paul alleged that the President broke his promise and stole his business partner, causing his business to crumble and, further, that his contributions to Hillary Clinton's campaign were falsely reported to the Federal Election Commission.
 Besides the Clintons, three other individuals who were involved in fundraising for the gala, were named as defendants in the suit.
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg is a case heard between 2003 and 2005 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
 Judge Shira Scheindlin, presiding over the case, issued a series of groundbreaking opinions in the field of electronic discovery.
 Plaintiff Laura Zubulake filed suit against her former employer UBS, alleging gender discrimination, failure to promote, and retaliation.
 Judge Shira Scheindlin's rulings comprise some of the most often cited in the area of electronic discovery, and were made prior to the 2006 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
 The relevant opinions in the field are known as Zubulake I, Zubulake III, Zubulake IV, and Zubulake V.
 In 2012, the plaintiff published a book about her e-discovery experiences titled "Zubulake's e-Discovery: The Untold Story of my Quest for Justice." Comparative negligence
Comparative negligence, or non-absolute contributory negligence outside the United States, is a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury.
 When the defense is asserted, the factfinder, usually a jury, must decide the degree to which the plaintiff's negligence and the combined negligence of all other relevant actors all contributed to cause the plaintiff's damages.
 It is a modification of the doctrine of contributory negligence that disallows any recovery by a plaintiff whose negligence contributed even minimally to causing the damages. Augustus Henry Novelli
Augustus Henry Novelli was a London-based physician who graduated Cambridge University in 1845.
 He lived for a time at Sydenham Hill.
 He went on to become involved in the Consolidated Bank Limited, and eventually one of its directors.
 He was in 1870 a plaintiff in "Smith & Novelli v Lay", a suit filed in Court of Chancery, over finance to the Meiji government of Imperial Japan. Andrea Constand v. William H. Cosby, Jr.
Andrea Constand v. William H. Cosby Jr. is a civil suit filed in March 2005 and resolved with an undisclosed cash settlement (including a confidentiality agreement between its two parties) in November 2006.
 The case was filed by Andrea Constand, a former college and Canadian national team basketball player, against comedian and entertainer Bill Cosby, concerning a sexual assault that allegedly occurred in Cosby's home in January 2004 while Constand was working for Temple University women's basketball team in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
 At that time, no criminal charges were filed. Consolidated Music Corporation
Consolidated Music Corporation was a short-lived American music publishing licensing company formed in early 1920 — initially by seven major music publishers, but eventually six — to handle piano roll licensing.
 Consolidated and the six remaining firms, all headquartered in New York City, were located within a few blocks of one another.
 Consolidated and its six corporate sponsors were defendants named in a Sherman Antitrust suit filed August 3, 1920, by the US Justice Department in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
 The plaintiff was represented by Henry Anderson Guiler (1877–1938), Assistant U.S. District Attorney. D.S. (song)
"D.S." is an album track by Michael Jackson from his 1995 double disc record "".
 It is track six on the second disc, one of the three songs from that disc whose lyrics are printed in the album booklet, and is four minutes and forty-nine seconds in length.
 The song is often cited as a derogatory reference to Santa Barbara County District Attorney Tom Sneddon, whose name is similar to the subject of the song, Dom Sheldon.
 When Jackson was accused of child sexual abuse in 1993, the investigation was controlled by Sneddon, who also ordered that Jackson be strip searched.
 The criminal investigation was subsequently closed when according to the "New York Times", "the boy and his family announced that they would no longer cooperate.
 In an out-of-court settlement of a civil suit filed by the family, the boy was to receive a payment of more than $10 million, according to Mr. Jackson’s associates."
 Jackson was angered by the allegations, his perception of being mistreated by the police and media, and the negative effect on his health. Hart v. Comcast Corp.
Hart v. Comcast was a suit filed by Jon Hart, a citizen of California against Comcast in Alameda County.
 Comcast is a provider of internet access and services.
 The suit alleged that Comcast was illegally interfering with certain types of internet traffic, such as BitTorrent.
 The suit alleged that Comcast is guilty of false advertising for advertising high speed service yet deliberately using technology to interfere with access speeds.
 The suit also claimed Comcast's actions violated established Federal Communications Commission policies on Net Neutrality.
 The case has since been settled out of court. New York v. Strauss-Kahn
The People of the State of New York v. Strauss-Kahn was a criminal case relating to allegations of sexual assault and attempted rape made by a hotel maid, Nafissatou Diallo, against Dominique Strauss-Kahn at the Sofitel New York Hotel on 14 May 2011.
 The charges were dismissed at the request of the prosecution which pointed out serious doubts in Diallo's credibility and inconclusive physical evidence.
 In a television interview in September, Strauss-Kahn admitted that his liaison with Diallo was a moral fault and described it as "inappropriate" but that it did not involve violence, constraint or aggression.
 He said that Diallo had lied and that he had no intention of negotiating with her over a civil suit she had filed against him.
 The suit was later settled for an undisclosed amount, subsequently reported to have been $1.5 million.