Datasets:

lidingm
/

ViewSpatial-Bench

@@ -16,136 +16,62 @@ configs:
   - split: test
     path: ViewSpatial-Bench.json
 ---
-# Dataset Card for Dataset Name
 <!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
-This dataset card aims to be a base template for new datasets. It has been generated using [this raw template](https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/blob/main/src/huggingface_hub/templates/datasetcard_template.md?plain=1).
-## Dataset Details
-### Dataset Description
 <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this dataset is. -->
 ViewSpatial-Bench is the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for evaluating multi-viewpoint spatial orientation recognition capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs) across five distinct task types. The benchmark assesses how well VLMs can perform spatial reasoning from different perspectives, focusing on both egocentric (camera) and allocentric (human subject) viewpoints.
 The benchmark addresses a critical limitation in current VLMs: while they excel at egocentric spatial reasoning (from the camera's perspective), they struggle to generalize to allocentric viewpoints when required to adopt another entity's spatial frame of reference. This capability, known as "perspective-taking," is crucial for embodied interaction, spatial navigation, and multi-agent collaboration.
 - **Language(s) (NLP):** en
 - **License:** apache-2.0
-### Dataset Sources [optional]
-<!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. -->
-- **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
-- **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
-- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
 ## Uses
-<!-- Address questions around how the dataset is intended to be used. -->
-### Direct Use
-<!-- This section describes suitable use cases for the dataset. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-### Out-of-Scope Use
-<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the dataset will not work well for. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-## Dataset Structure
-<!-- This section provides a description of the dataset fields, and additional information about the dataset structure such as criteria used to create the splits, relationships between data points, etc. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-## Dataset Creation
-### Curation Rationale
-<!-- Motivation for the creation of this dataset. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-### Source Data
-<!-- This section describes the source data (e.g. news text and headlines, social media posts, translated sentences, ...). -->
-#### Data Collection and Processing
-<!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-#### Who are the source data producers?
-<!-- This section describes the people or systems who originally created the data. It should also include self-reported demographic or identity information for the source data creators if this information is available. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-### Annotations [optional]
-<!-- If the dataset contains annotations which are not part of the initial data collection, use this section to describe them. -->
-#### Annotation process
-<!-- This section describes the annotation process such as annotation tools used in the process, the amount of data annotated, annotation guidelines provided to the annotators, interannotator statistics, annotation validation, etc. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-#### Who are the annotators?
-<!-- This section describes the people or systems who created the annotations. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-#### Personal and Sensitive Information
-<!-- State whether the dataset contains data that might be considered personal, sensitive, or private (e.g., data that reveals addresses, uniquely identifiable names or aliases, racial or ethnic origins, sexual orientations, religious beliefs, political opinions, financial or health data, etc.). If efforts were made to anonymize the data, describe the anonymization process. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
-<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-### Recommendations
-<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
-Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset. More information needed for further recommendations.
-## Citation [optional]
-<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
-**BibTeX:**
-[More Information Needed]
-**APA:**
-[More Information Needed]
-## Glossary [optional]
-<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the dataset or dataset card. -->
-[More Information Needed]
-## More Information [optional]
-[More Information Needed]
-## Dataset Card Authors [optional]
-[More Information Needed]
-## Dataset Card Contact
-[More Information Needed]

   - split: test
     path: ViewSpatial-Bench.json
 ---
+# ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models
 <!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
+## Dataset Description
 <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this dataset is. -->
+We introduce ViewSpatial-Bench to quantitatively evaluate VLMs' spatial localization capabilities in 3D environments from multiple perspectives. Our benchmark contains over 5,700 question-answer pairs spanning more than 1,000 unique 3D scenes, with source imagery from the validation sets of ScanNet and MS-CoCo.
 ViewSpatial-Bench is the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for evaluating multi-viewpoint spatial orientation recognition capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs) across five distinct task types. The benchmark assesses how well VLMs can perform spatial reasoning from different perspectives, focusing on both egocentric (camera) and allocentric (human subject) viewpoints.
 The benchmark addresses a critical limitation in current VLMs: while they excel at egocentric spatial reasoning (from the camera's perspective), they struggle to generalize to allocentric viewpoints when required to adopt another entity's spatial frame of reference. This capability, known as "perspective-taking," is crucial for embodied interaction, spatial navigation, and multi-agent collaboration.
 - **Language(s) (NLP):** en
 - **License:** apache-2.0
 ## Uses
+**I. With HuggingFace datasets library.**
+```py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+ds = load_dataset("lidingm/ViewSpatial-Bench")
+```
+**II. Evaluation using Open-Source Code.**
+Evaluate using our open-source evaluation code available on Github.(Coming Soon)
+```py
+# Clone the repository
+git clone https://github.com/lidingm/ViewSpatial-Bench.git
+cd ViewSpatial-Bench
+# Install dependencies
+pip install -r requirements.txt
+# Run evaluation
+python eval.py --model_name your_model --dataset_path path/to/dataset
+```
+You can configure the appropriate model parameters and evaluation settings according to the framework's requirements to obtain performance evaluation results on the ViewSpatial-Bench dataset.
+## Benchamrk
+We provide benchmark results for various open-source models as well as **GPT-4o** and **Gemini 2.0 Flash** on our benchmark. *More model evaluations will be added.*
+| **Model** | **Camera-based Tasks** | | | **Person-based Tasks** | | | | **Overall** |
+|-----------|----------|----------|-----|----------|----------|----------|-----|-----------|
+| | Rel. Dir. | Obj. Ori. | Avg. | Obj. Ori. | Rel. Dir. | Sce. Sim. | Avg. | |
+| InternVL2.5 (2B) | 38.52 | 22.59 | 32.79 | 47.09 | 40.02 | 25.70 | 37.04 | 34.98 |
+| Qwen2.5-VL (3B) [Backbone] | 43.43 | 33.33 | 39.80 | 39.16 | 28.62 | 28.51 | 32.14 | 35.85 |
+| Qwen2.5-VL (7B) | 46.64 | 29.72 | 40.56 | 37.05 | 35.04 | 28.78 | 33.37 | 36.85 |
+| LLaVA-NeXT-Video (7B) | 26.34 | 19.28 | 23.80 | 44.68 | 38.60 | 29.05 | 37.07 | 30.64 |
+| LLaVA-OneVision (7B) | 29.84 | 26.10 | 28.49 | 22.39 | 31.00 | 26.88 | 26.54 | 27.49 |
+| InternVL2.5 (8B) | 49.41 | **41.27** | 46.48 | 46.79 | 42.04 | **32.85** | 40.20 | **43.24** |
+| Llama-3.2-Vision (11B) | 25.27 | 20.98 | 23.73 | 51.20 | 32.19 | 18.82 | 33.61 | 28.82 |
+| InternVL3 (14B) | **54.65** | 33.63 | **47.09** | 33.43 | 37.05 | 31.86 | 33.88 | 40.28 |
+| Kimi-VL-Instruct (16B) | 26.85 | 22.09 | 25.14 | **63.05** | **43.94** | 20.27 | **41.52** | 33.58 |
+| GPT-4o | 41.46 | 19.58 | 33.57 | 42.97 | 40.86 | 26.79 | 36.29 | 34.98 |
+| Gemini 2.0 Flash | 45.29 | 12.95 | 33.66 | 41.16 | 32.78 | 21.90 | 31.53 | 32.56 |
+| Random Baseline | 25.16 | 26.10 | 25.50 | 24.60 | 31.12 | 26.33 | 27.12 | 26.33 |
+## Citation
+```
+Coming Soon
+```