	Federal, State, and Local Authorities Are Beginning to Take Steps to Adapt to Climate Change

Our October 2009 report on climate change adaptation found no  coordinated national approach to adaptation, but our May 2011 report on  climate change funding cited indications that federal agencies were  beginning to respond to climate change more systematically. The task force was formed to  develop federal recommendations for adapting to climate change impacts  both domestically and internationally and to recommend key components  to include in a national strategy. Individual agencies are also beginning to consider adaptation actions. For  example, in May 2009, the Chief of Naval Operations created Task Force  Climate Change to address the naval implications of a changing Arctic  and global environment. In October 2009, we reported that some state and local authorities were  beginning to plan for and respond to climate change impacts. These and other  efforts are described in DEP’s 2008 Climate Change Program  Assessment and Action Plan. The flood control zone district planned to use the funds, in part,  to upgrade flood protection facilities to increase the county’s resilience  to future flooding. In addition to more severe winter storms, the county  expected that climate change would lead to sea level rise; reduced  snowpack; and summertime extreme weather such as heat waves  and drought, which can lead to power shortages because hydropower  is an important source of power in the region. As part of this  effort, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) chaired  an Adaptation and Response Working Group, which issued a report  on sea level rise and coastal storms. Government Officials Face Numerous Challenges When Considering Adaptation Efforts, and Further Federal Action Could Help Them Make More Informed Decisions

In our prior work, we found that the challenges faced by federal, state,  and local officials in their efforts to adapt to climate change fell into  several categories:    Focusing on immediate needs. Without sufficient site-specific data, such  as local projections of expected changes, it is hard to predict the  impacts of climate change and thus hard for officials to justify the  current costs of adaptation efforts for potentially less certain future  benefits. Based on information obtained from studies, visits to sites pursuing  adaptation efforts, and responses to a Web-based questionnaire sent to  federal, state, and local officials knowledgeable about adaptation, our  October 2009 report identified three categories of potential federal actions  for addressing challenges to adaptation efforts:    First, training and education efforts could increase awareness among  government officials and the public about the impacts of climate  change and available adaptation strategies.   Second, actions to provide and interpret site-specific information could  help officials understand the impacts of climate change at a scale that  would enable them to respond. Some of our other recent climate change-related reports offer additional  examples of the types of actions federal agencies and the Congress  could take to assist states and communities in their efforts to adapt. Furthermore, our May  2008 report on the economics of policy options to address climate change  identified actions Congress and federal agencies could take, such as  reforming insurance subsidy programs in areas vulnerable to hurricanes  or flooding. Funding for Adaptation and Other Federal Climate Change Activities Could be Better Tracked, Reported, and Aligned with Strategic Priorities

Our May 2011 report on federal climate change funding found that   (1) agencies do not consistently interpret methods for defining and  reporting the funding of climate change activities, (2) key factors  complicate efforts to align such funding with strategic priorities, and   (3) options are available to better align federal funding with strategic  priorities, including governmentwide strategic planning. Our work suggests that existing methods for defining and reporting  climate change funding are not consistently interpreted and applied  across the federal government. In addition, our work identified two key factors that complicate efforts to  align federal climate change funding with strategic priorities across the  federal government. First, federal officials lack a shared understanding of  priorities, partly due to the multiple, often inconsistent messages  articulated in different sources, such as strategic plans. The multiple sources for communicating priorities across  the climate change enterprise may result in conflicting messages and  confusion. The second key factor that complicates efforts to align federal funding  with priorities is that existing mechanisms intended to do so are  nonbinding, according to respondents, available literature, and  stakeholders. Specific options are discussed in detail in our May 2011  report and include a governmentwide strategic planning process that  promotes a shared understanding among agencies of strategic priorities  by articulating what they are expected to do within the overall federal  response to climate change.
Why GAO Did This Study

A 2009 assessment by the United States Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) found that many types of extreme weather events, such as heat waves and regional droughts, have become more frequent and intense during the past 40 to 50 years. According to the assessment, changes in extreme weather and climate events will affect many aspects of society and the natural environment, such as infrastructure. In addition, the Department of Defense found that climate change may act as an accelerant of instability or conflict, placing a burden to respond on militaries around the world. According to the National Academies, USGCRP, and others, greenhouse gases already in the atmosphere will continue altering the climate system into the future regardless of emissions control efforts. Therefore, adaptation--defined as adjustments to natural or human systems in response to actual or expected climate change--is an important part of the response to climate change. This testimony addresses (1) the actions federal, state, and local authorities are taking to adapt to climate change; (2) the challenges that federal, state, and local officials face in their efforts to adapt and actions federal agencies could take to help address these challenges; and (3) the extent to which federal funding for adaptation and other climate change activities is consistently tracked and reported and aligned with strategic priorities. The information in this testimony is based on prior work, largely on GAO's recent reports on climate change adaptation and federal climate change funding.

What GAO Found

Federal, state, and local authorities are beginning to take steps to adapt to climate change. Federal agencies are beginning to respond to climate change systematically through an Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force formed to recommend key components for inclusion in a national adaptation strategy. Individual agencies are also beginning to consider adaptation actions. For example, in May 2009, the Chief of Naval Operations created Task Force Climate Change to address the naval implications of a changing Arctic and global environment. Some state and local government authorities were beginning to plan for and respond to climate change impacts, GAO reported in 2009. For example, the state of Maryland had a strategy for reducing vulnerability to climate change, which focused on protecting habitat and infrastructure from future risks associated with sea level rise and coastal storms. In another example, King County, Washington, established a countywide flood control zone district to upgrade flood protection facilities and increase the county's resilience to future flooding, among other things. Federal, state, and local officials face numerous challenges in their efforts to adapt to climate change, and further federal action could help them make more informed decisions. These challenges include a focus of available attention and resources on more immediate needs and insufficient site-specific data--such as local projections of expected climate changes. The lack of such data makes it hard to understand the impacts of climate change and thus hard for officials to justify the cost of adaptation efforts, since future benefits are potentially less certain than current costs. GAO's October 2009 report identified potential federal actions for improving adaptation efforts, including actions to provide and interpret site-specific information, which could help officials understand the impacts of climate change at a scale that would enable them to respond. In a May 2008 report on the economics of policy options to address climate change, GAO identified actions Congress and federal agencies could take, such as reforming insurance subsidy programs in areas vulnerable to hurricanes or flooding. Funding for adaptation and other federal climate change activities could be better tracked, reported, and aligned with strategic priorities. GAO's report on federal climate change funding suggests that methods for defining and reporting such funding are not consistently interpreted and applied across the federal government. GAO also identified two key factors that complicate efforts to align funding with priorities. First, officials across a broad range of federal agencies lack a shared understanding of priorities, partly due to the multiple, often inconsistent messages articulated in different policy documents, such as strategic plans. Second, existing mechanisms intended to align funding with governmentwide priorities are nonbinding and limited when in conflict with agencies' own priorities. Federal officials who responded to a Web-based questionnaire, available literature, and stakeholders involved in climate change funding identified several ways to better align federal climate change funding with strategic priorities. These include a governmentwide strategic planning process that promotes a shared understanding among agencies of strategic priorities by articulating what they are expected to do within the overall federal response to climate change.