	GAO’s High-Risk Series Raises the Priority and Visibility of the Need to Transform Federal Oversight of Food Safety

Overall, our High-Risk Series has served to identify and help resolve  serious government weaknesses in areas that involve substantial resources  and provide critical services to the public. With that in  mind, we designated the federal oversight of food safety as a high-risk area  to raise the priority and visibility of the need to transform the federal  government’s oversight system. Similarly, food contamination, such as the recent E. coli  outbreaks, can harm local economies. While 15 agencies collectively administer at least 30 laws related to food  safety, the two primary agencies are the U.S. Department of Agriculture  (USDA), which is responsible for the safety of meat, poultry, and  processed egg products, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),  which is responsible for virtually all other foods. During the past 30 years, we  have detailed problems with the current fragmented federal food safety  system and reported that the system has caused inconsistent oversight,  ineffective coordination, and inefficient use of resources. Specifically:    Existing statutes give agencies different regulatory and enforcement  authorities. Under current law, thousands of USDA inspectors maintain  continuous inspection at slaughter facilities and examine all  slaughtered meat and poultry carcasses. They also visit each  processing facility at least once during each operating day. For foods  under FDA’s jurisdiction, however, federal law does not mandate the  frequency of inspections. Federal agencies are spending resources on overlapping food safety  activities. USDA and FDA both inspect shipments of imported food at  18 U.S. ports of entry. However, these two agencies do not share  inspection resources at these ports. USDA and FDA provide guidance to companies for carrying  out voluntary recalls. These agencies  do not know how promptly and completely companies are carrying out  recalls, do not promptly verify that recalls have reached all segments of  the distribution chain, and use procedures that may not be effective to  alert consumers to a recall. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, have heightened concerns  about agriculture’s vulnerability to terrorism. Federal Oversight of Food Safety Should Be Addressed as a 21st Century Challenge

We have cited the need to integrate the fragmented federal food safety  system as a significant challenge for the 21st century, to be addressed in  light of the nation’s current deficit and growing structural fiscal  imbalance. To help Congress  review and reconsider the base of federal spending, we framed illustrative  questions for decision makers to consider. While these questions can apply  to other areas needing broad-based transformation, we specifically cited  the myriad of food safety programs managed across several federal  agencies. How can agencies more strategically manage their portfolio of tools  and adopt more innovative methods to contribute to the achievement  of national outcomes? As I have discussed, GAO designated the federal oversight of food safety  as a high-risk area that is in need of a broad-based transformation to  achieve greater economy, efficiency, effectiveness, accountability, and  sustainability.
Why GAO Did This Study

Each year, about 76 million people contract a foodborne illness in the United States; about 325,000 require hospitalization; and about 5,000 die. While the recent E. coli outbreaks highlighted the risks posed by accidental contamination, the attacks of September 11, 2001, heightened awareness that the food supply could also be vulnerable to deliberate contamination. This testimony focuses on the (1) role that GAO's high-risk series can play in raising the priority and visibility of the need to transform federal oversight of food safety, (2) fragmented nature of federal oversight of food safety, and (3) need to address federal oversight of food safety as a 21st century challenge. This work is based on previously issued reports.

What GAO Found

GAO's high-risk series is intended to raise the priority and visibility of government programs that are in need of broad-based transformation to achieve greater economy, efficiency, effectiveness, accountability, and sustainability. In January 2007, as part of our regular update of this series for each new Congress, GAO designated the federal oversight of food safety as a high-risk area for the first time. While this nation enjoys a plentiful and varied food supply that is generally considered to be safe, the federal oversight of food safety is fragmented, with 15 agencies collectively administering at least 30 laws related to food safety. The two primary agencies are the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which is responsible for the safety of meat, poultry, and processed egg products, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is responsible for other food. In many previous reports, GAO found that this fragmented system has caused inconsistent oversight, ineffective coordination, and inefficient use of resources. For example, existing statutes give agencies different regulatory and enforcement authorities. Under current law, thousands of USDA inspectors must examine all slaughtered carcasses and visit all processing facilities at least once during each operating day. However, federal law does not mandate the frequency of inspection for foods that are under FDA's jurisdiction. Food recalls are generally voluntary. While USDA and FDA provide guidance to companies for carrying out voluntary recalls, they do not know how promptly and completely companies carry out recalls and do not promptly verify that recalls have reached the entire distribution chain. In addition, they use procedures that may not be effective to alert consumers to a recall. Federal agencies are spending resources on overlapping food safety activities. USDA and FDA both inspect shipments of imported food at 18 U.S. ports of entry but do not share inspection resources at these ports. Integrating the fragmented federal food safety system is a significant challenge for the 21st century, particularly in light of the nation's current deficit and growing structural fiscal imbalance. To help Congress review and reconsider the base of federal spending, GAO framed illustrative questions for decision makers to consider in 21st Century Challenges: Reexamining the Base of the Federal Government. Among these questions are how agencies can integrate and share accountability for their activities on crosscutting issues and how they can adopt more innovative methods to contribute to the achievement of national outcomes. While framing these questions, GAO specifically cited the myriad of food safety programs managed across several federal agencies.