State and Local Governments Face Increasing Fiscal Challenges in the Next 50 Years

		State and Local Fiscal Model Simulations Show Sector Facing Long-Term Fiscal Challenges

Our March 2010 state and local fiscal model updates simulations showing  that state and local governments’ long-term fiscal position will steadily  decline through 2060 absent policy changes (see fig. These results confirm our recent finding that while states’ near- term revenue shortfalls have been cushioned by the temporary infusion of  American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) funds,  as shown in the insert within figure 1, states will continue to be fiscally  stressed. The primary driver of the fiscal pressure confronting the state and local  sector is the continued growth in health-related costs. Historical Data Show Aggregate Shifts in State and Local Expenditures, Revenues, and Intergovernmental Grants

Over the last 30 years, health care spending has increased as a share of  state and local spending, growing from 12 percent of overall state and  local expenditures in 1978 to 20 percent in 2008 (see fig. State and Local Spending and Revenue Trends Varied Among the States for the Past 30 Years

The rates of growth in expenditures and revenues varied among the states  during the past 30 years, both overall and within specific categories of  expenditures and revenues. The state and local  sector as a whole generally avoided operating deficits despite current  spending growing faster than own-source revenues in part because the  growth in federal grants for the purpose of funding current spending  somewhat exceeded the growth in current spending. In addition, from  1995 to 2007, the sector increasingly financed capital purchases by issuing  debt, rather than with revenues, which left more revenues available to pay  for current expenditures. However, if the overall  trend of expenditure growth in excess of revenue growth persists; state  and local government expenditure growth will put increasing pressure on  state and local governments going forward. The growth of intergovernmental revenue from the federal government  (federal grants) was mixed. State and local current expenditures grew  faster than federal grant revenues in more than half of the states (see fig. For the state and local government sector in the aggregate, federal grants  grew as a share of state and local current expenditures from 1977 to 2007  for three of the four types of spending that we assessed—health and  hospitals, education, and public welfare (which includes Medicaid  spending). 3. Growth rates for public welfare  expenditures during the same period ranged from 2.3 to 10.9 percent in  individual states. Salaries and wages: State and local government spending on salaries and  wages grew at an average annual rate of 2.9 percent between 1977 and  2007 and growth ranged from 0.4 percent to 5.5 percent for individual  states during this time period. Fiscal Pressures Could Affect Delivery of Intergovernmental Programs

Given the nature of the partnership among levels of government in  providing services to the public and the economic interrelationships  among levels of government, understanding patterns in state and local  government expenditures and revenues is crucial for identifying and  analyzing potential fiscal pressures for the sector. The interconnectedness which defines  intergovernmental programs requires that all levels of government remain  aware of and ready to respond to fiscal pressures. These challenges have implications for a wide range of federal, state, and  local programs, policies, and activities. Actions to address the nation’s long-term fiscal  outlook will be needed at all government levels in coming years and the  challenges cannot simply be shifted from one level of government to  another. Specifically, we examined (1) the fiscal pressures facing state and local  governments during the next several decades and the past expenditure  and revenue trends that influence these pressures, (2) state and local  government expenditure and revenue trends to identify patterns among  states, and (3) what is known about the implications of long-term state and  local government fiscal pressures for current and future federal policies. We then selected analogous categories in the U.S. Census  Bureau data to analyze expenditure trends by category and state.
Why GAO Did This Study

State and local governments work in partnership with the federal government to implement numerous intergovernmental programs. Fiscal pressures for state and local governments may exist when spending is expected to outpace revenues for the long term. GAO was asked to examine (1) the long-term fiscal pressures facing state and local governments and historical spending and revenue trends, (2) spending and revenue trends to identify patterns among states, and (3) what is known about the implications of these fiscal pressures for federal policies. Using aggregate data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis's National Income and Product Accounts, this analysis draws on results from the March 2010 update to GAO's state and local government fiscal model. GAO's model uses historical data to simulate expenditures and revenues for the sector for the next 50 years. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau are used to analyze patterns of state and local government expenditures and revenues among the states from 1977 to 2007, the most recent 30-year period for which these data were available. A review of GAO and other reports synthesizes what is known about the implications of these long-term fiscal pressures for future federal policies.

What GAO Found

Understanding patterns in state and local government expenditures and revenues is crucial for identifying and analyzing potential future fiscal pressures for the sector. The March 2010 update to GAO's state and local fiscal model updates simulations that state and local governments' long-term fiscal position will steadily decline through 2060 absent policy changes. The primary driver of the fiscal pressure confronting the state and local sector is the continued growth in health-related costs. Over the last 30 years, health care spending has increased as a share of state and local spending, growing from 12 percent of overall state and local expenditures in 1978 to 20 percent in 2008. While the temporary infusion of funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 helped cushion near-term revenue shortfalls, states will continue to be fiscally stressed. The rates of growth in expenditures and revenues varied among the states during the past 30 years, both overall and within specific categories. Current expenditures grew faster than own-source revenues in almost all states between 1977 and 2007. Average annual growth rates of state and local government expenditures and revenues varied substantially by category and among states. For example, public welfare (which includes Medicaid) was one of the fastest growing expenditure categories. In the aggregate, inflation-adjusted spending on public welfare grew at an average annual rate of 5.3 percent per year and growth rates in individual states ranged from 2.3 percent to 10.9 percent. The growth of intergovernmental revenue from the federal government (grants) also varied among the states. State and local current expenditures grew faster than federal grant revenues in more than half of the states. Despite these trends, the sector in the aggregate usually remained in surplus during this 30-year period. The sector avoided operating deficits, in part because of federal grant growth, and in part because, from 1995 to 2007, the sector increasingly financed capital purchases by issuing debt, rather than with revenues, which left more revenues available to pay for current expenditures. However, if the overall trend of state and local government expenditure growth in excess of revenue growth persists, this growth will put increasing pressure on state and local governments going forward. All levels of government face long-term fiscal challenges which could affect future federal funding of intergovernmental programs, as well as the potential capacity of state and local governments to help fund and implement these programs. The interconnectedness which defines intergovernmental programs requires that officials at all levels of government remain aware of and ready to respond to fiscal pressures. These pressures have implications for a wide range of federal, state, and local programs, policies, and activities, and include costs associated with health care, physical infrastructure, state and local employee pensions and retiree health benefits, and education, among other areas. Actions to address the nation's long-term fiscal outlook will be needed at all government levels in coming years and the challenges cannot be adequately met by shifting burdens from one level of government to another. GAO does not make recommendations in this report.