Army Expects to Have Met Most Truck Armor Requirements by January 2006

The Army expects to have met its current requirements for the production  and installation of truck armor by the end of January 2006 except for fuel  tankers. Completion of armor kit installation for tankers is expected by  January 2007. Although the Army first identified a requirement for 3,780 truck armor kits  for five types of trucks in November 2003, it did not produce all of the kits  until February 2005 and did not install the kits to fully meet the initial  requirement until May 2005, or 18 months later. However, as shown in  figure 1, by that time requirements had increased substantially. As subsequent requirements for an additional 7,847 kits, excluding tankers,  were identified, the time lag to meet them lessened. Several Factors Lengthened the Time to Provide Truck Armor Kits

We identified a number of factors that contributed to the time to provide  truck armor to deployed troops. Third, material  shortages also affected the availability of armor kits. As  a result, troops were placed at greater risk as they conducted wartime  operations in vehicles not equipped with the preferred level of protection. Army headquarters validated an operational wartime need  for kits in support of OIF and other CENTCOM operations, and approved  3,780 armor kits for medium and heavy tactical wheeled vehicles. However, the Army  was not able to document these funding requests. DOD and the Services Took Actions to Improve Availability of Truck Armor during Current Operations

DOD and the Army have taken a number of short-term actions to improve  the availability of truck armor to meet the needs of forces deployed for OIF  and other CENTCOM operations. Army Has Developed a Long-term Plan to Address the Availability of Truck Armor for Future Operations

The Army is taking long-term actions to improve the availability of truck  armor for future operations through the development of a long-term  armoring plan. To determine what factors affected the time to provide truck armor to  deployed forces, we analyzed the armor supply data we collected to  identify trends and isolate factors that impacted the timeliness of  producing and installing armor. Specifically, the Army awarded a contract for 131  additional HET add-on-armor kits in April 2005. Extent Armor Kits Were Produced and Installed to Meet Identified Requirements

Requirements for armoring 371 tankers were first identified in August 2004;  however, a sufficient number of kits to meet that requirement were not  produced and installed until August 2005, 12 months after the initial  requirement was identified.
Why GAO Did This Study

In April 2005, GAO reported on factors affecting the timely production of up-armored high-mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV) and add-on armor kits for HMMWVs, as well as other items critically needed by deployed forces during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Due to high interest by Congress and the public regarding vehicle armor, GAO initiated this subsequent engagement to examine issues affecting the production and installation of armor for medium and heavy trucks. The objectives were to (1) determine the extent to which truck armor was produced and installed to meet identified requirements, (2) identify what factors affected the time to provide truck armor, and (3) identify what actions the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Army have taken to improve the timely availability of truck armor. To address these objectives, GAO collected and analyzed supply data for medium and heavy tactical trucks used by Army forces.

What GAO Found

The Army expects to have met its current requirements for the production and installation of truck armor by the end of January 2006 except for fuel tankers. Completion of armor kit installation for tankers is expected by January 2007. Although the Army first identified a requirement for 3,780 truck armor kits for five types of trucks in November 2003, it did not produce all of the kits until February 2005 and did not install the kits to fully meet the requirement until May 2005--18 months after the initial requirement was identified. However, by that time, requirements had increased substantially. As subsequent requirements for an additional 7,847 kits, excluding tankers, were identified, the time lag to meet them lessened. A number of factors contributed to the time to provide truck armor kits to deployed troops, placing them at greater risk as they conducted wartime operations in vehicles not equipped with the preferred level of protection. For example, the Army missed a valuable opportunity to have substantial numbers of truck armor kits available for Operation Iraqi Freedom by not fully capitalizing on approved operational requirements established in 1996. In addition, production time lengthened because contracts were awarded for amounts less than total requirements due to increasing needs for truck armor and inadequate funding. As was the case for other critical wartime shortages that GAO previously examined, sufficient documentation was lacking to determine why funding was not available when needed, limiting effective oversight over funding decisions. Material shortages and limited tanker kit installation rates also impacted the availability of truck armor. DOD and the Army have taken a number of short-term actions, such as leveraging available funding, to improve truck armor availability during current operations. The Army is also developing a long-term armoring plan to improve the availability of truck armor for future operations.