original passage: In 2008, Narconon executive Marie Cecchini published, with Richard Lennox, a paper that claimed to show that the Narconon educational program reduced drug use among youths. However, the study was funded by Narconon's parent organisation, ABLE, and subsequent correspondence in the same journal asserted that the study's conclusions were contradicted by its own data: that the control group "were more likely to resist pressures to take drugs" than the Narconon group.
original sentence: However, the study was funded by Narconon's parent organisation, ABLE, and subsequent correspondence in the same journal asserted that the study's conclusions were contradicted by its own data: that the control group "were more likely to resist pressures to take drugs" than the Narconon group.
sentence2: Was it reasonable to conclude that the Narconon paper unfairly criticized as industry propaganda after taking a closer look at the data?
sentence1: In 2008, Narconon executive Marie Cecchini published, with Richard Lennox, a paper that claimed to show that the Narconon educational program reduced drug use among youths. However suspicious it was that the study was funded by Narconon's parent organisation, ABLE, subsequent correspondence in the same journal asserted that the study's conclusions were corroborated by the data: that the Narconon group "were more likely to resist pressures to take drugs" than the control group.