Remember Zell Miller's impassioned speech at the Republican National Convention?  Remember how articulately he enumerated the failings of the Democratic Party and its leaders?  Remember his appeal to common sense and the power of his oratory?  Then recall the analysis of his speech afterward by respected voices from all frequencies on the political spectrum?  The conclusion: his speech didn't change a single mind, didn't capture a single vote for the President.  The problem was that his appeal was not to the middle, where the difference is made, but to the already committed.  Men in Black follows suit.  It is designed to make Conservatives more comfortable with their conservatism.  It is an articulate  presentation of the argument for "originalism," or as it used to be called, "strict constructionism."  If the Constitution doesn't say anything about abortion, then issues related to abortion cannot be adjudicated by the Supreme Court.  A perusal of the chapter headings reveals its themes: Radicals in Robes...Justices in the Bedroom...Endorsing Racism...Al Qaeda Gets a Lawyer...and my personal favorite, Socialism from the Bench.  Mark Levin is absolutely right; his arguments are sound, and the logic is well-developed.  Yet, his bombastic style detracts from the presentation and ultimately makes us feel partisan, as opposed to intellectually curious.  Levin's book may make the red states a shade redder, but the outreach to the undecided mind remains to be done.