anchor.diff:  
   == Caveats to this proposal
   
  -Several of the reserved words do represent general-purpose words that one would like to use as informative identifiers.
  -This proposal would take away the ability to use these identifiers, meaning that some statements would be slightly more difficult to write.
  +Several of the reserved words do represent general-purpose words that one may like to use as informative identifiers.
  +This proposal would remove the ability to use these identifiers, meaning that some statements may be slightly more difficult to write.
  
positive.code: RETURN 2 + `with`, coalesce(`null`, 3.1415)
  ----
  
  While not recommended, this query is still better than unescaped form, as it is clear to the reader that the literals and keywords used as variables do not represent their special meaning.
  
  The relationship type and the two property keys in this query still carry names that coincide with keywords and/or literals.
  We discuss this further below, in <<Alternatives>>.
  
  === Interaction with existing features
  
negative.code: 
  == Motivation
  
  Consider the following query, which is syntactically and semantically correct:
  
  [source, cypher]
  ----
  