anchor.diff:  trouble with in your application, try to convert the gist of it to one of the toy graphs.  Taking this step will make it
   easier for advanced Gremlin users to help you, which should lead to a faster response time for your problem. In
   addition, there is the added benefit that the mailing list post will be more relevant to other users, as it is
  -not written solely in the context of your domain.
  +not written solely in the context of your domain. If the sample data sets don't properly demonstrate your issue, then
  +including a Gremlin script that can construct a small body of sample data would be equally helpful.
   
   [[help]]
   As you get familiar with the console, it is good to know what some of the basic commands are. A "command" is not
  
positive.code: 
  public final class Traversals {
    public static Map<String,List<Vertex>> groupAround(GraphTraversalSource g, long vertexId) {
      return g.V(vertexId).outE().group().by(label).by(inV()).next()
    }
  }
  ----
  
negative.code: 
  image:gremlin-console-ide.png[float=left,width=300] The first line assigns the `Traversal` to `t`, but the line itself
  is actually two lines of code as denoted by the semi-colon. The line of execution actually returns `null`, which is
  what the console actual auto-iterates. At that point, you can work with `t` as you desire.
  
  Turning your attention back to the original problem, you can now think about the issue with the `Traversal` not
  containing the appropriate number of vertices in the context of iteration. In the original `Traversal` the second
  