anchor.diff:  Definitely. A lot
   of people use <<xref/../../../tools/emacs-inf#,Emacs with Clojure>>, there are also excellent plugins for <<xref/../../../tools/cursive#,IntelliJ>>, <<xref/../../../tools/vim#,Vim>>, Eclipse and <<xref/../../../tools/sublime#,Sublime Text>>.
   
  -You’ll probably find that structural editing is more practical than what
  -you’re used to, because it naturally lets you manipulate the building
  +You'll probably find that structural editing is more practical than what
  +you're used to, because it naturally lets you manipulate the building
   blocks of your code (i.e expressions, not lines or words).
   
   [[are-there-build-tools-for-clojurescript]]
  
positive.code: 
  In many respects, ClojureScript is leading the way for the wider
  React/Flux community, as shown by the progressive adoption of immutable
  data structures, the ‘all state in one place’ principle, and other
  functional techniques.
  
  [[can-i-re-use-react-components-in-clojurescript]]
  
negative.code: * a very comprehensive, battle-tested library
  * very efficient minification
  * dead-code elimination, i.e code which is not used is removed. (This is
  what enables the library to be comprehensive: you don't have worry about
  the extra bytes when adding functionality.)
  
  The majority of JavaScript developers have rejected Google Closure
  