anchor.diff:  lacunarum Vauras & E. Larss.,Goniospora,Stellate,Stellate | Fingered,[9.5-13.8],[8-11.1],[1.1-1.5],"With about 14 to 16 prominent, narrowly conical and rounded nodules",Claviform,[26-40],[9-15],[4-4],Yes,Ventricose | Utriform | Fusiform | Metuloid,[38-76],[13-21],Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Ovoid | Pyriform | Clavate,[14-28],[7-16],Yes,Ventricose | Utriform | Fusiform | Metuloid,[54-84],[14-30],Yes,[4-5],n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Utriform | Fusiform | Metuloid,[40-80],[13-21],n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Utriform | Fusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Bare soil,Birch | poplar | Oak,[6-40],[6-40],Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Faintly,Clypeus,,,"Inocybe lacunarum is a rather characteristic species with its stellate spores. In the phylogenetical tree (Fig. 1) it comes out as a sister species to I. populea, described from Japan (Kobayashi & Courtecuisse 2000). According to the original description it is about the same size, and with rather similar structure and colour. However, in micro-morphology it is somewhat different. The spores are smaller, 8.0-13.5 x 6.5-11.0 microns, on average 9.3-11.3 x 7.5-9.4 microns and Q = 1.1-1.3. Furthermore, the nodules are not as regular as in I. lacunarum, but there are also some crown-shaped double nodules. Pleurocystidia are shorter and narrower, 34-60(-71) x 12-15(-19) microns, as also the caulocystidia at stipe apex, which are 28-48 x 12-17 microns. In addition, according to the drawings, there are no crystals on the cystidia (Kobayashi & Courtecuisse 2000, Kobayshi 2002).","Vauras, Jukka and Larsson, Ellen. Inocybe caprimulgi and I. lacunarum, two new nodulose-spored species from Fennoscandia. Karstenia 55: 1-18, 2015 (2016); p. 12-17",,,,
   lanatodisca Kauffman,Leiospora,Subreniform | Inequilaterally | Ellipsoidal,Obtuse,[9-11],[5.5-6.5],n/a,Smooth,Claviform,[28-35],[10-12],[2-4],Yes,Claviform | Subventricose | Cylindrical,[33-65],[14-20],No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Subventricose | Cylindrical,[28-50],[9-25],No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Needles,Pine | Spruce,[20-90],[20-90],Subbulbous,n/a,maculata,n/a,,,,"When writing the original description of I. lanatodisca. Kauffman must have had in hand unusually pale specimens (Smith, A. H. 1939. Certain species of Inocybe in the Herbarium of the University of Michigan. Papers Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts Letters 24 : 93-106; p. 103) with more than the ordinary amount of white superficial layer on the pileal surface. This, in conjunction with his ambiguous description of the odor, has made his species rather difficult to recognize in the field. Actually, in our experience, I. lanatodisca is of widespread occurrence and often abundant locally, but it is usually much darker than "" pale ochraceous brownish "" or "" pale tawny "" (quotes from Kauffman 's description), and its odor is much more characteristic than merely "" nauseous "". The odor is complex, with three main components : green-corn, spermatic, and fragrant (sweet-aromatic). Usually the green-corn component is strongest when the specimen is collected, but fades subsequently, and the fragant component becomes more evident. The white superficial layer on the pileal surface varies considerably in amount from one collection to another, and is frequently absent altogether, giving the pileus a decidedly different appearance from that stressed in the original description. We cannot agree with Heim 's contention (Heim, R. 1931. Le genre Inocybe. Encyclopedie Mycologique I. P. Lechevalier & Fils, Paris. 429 p.; p. 197, 395) that I. lanatodisca is a synonym of I. maculata Boudier. Where the two species occur together they are readily distinguished. See the comments under I. maculata.","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes I., Mycologia, vol. 60, 1968; p. 412-413",,,,
   lanatodisca var. phaeoderma (D.E. Stuntz) Grund & D.E. Stuntz,Leiospora,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,,,,See Inocybe armoricana Heim var. phaeoderma Stuntz,"Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes III., Mycologia, vol. 67, 1975; p. 30",,,,
  -langei R. Heim,Leiospora,Regular | Subamygdaliform,Obtuse,[6-8],[4-5],[1.4-1.8],Smooth,Claviform,[22-28],[7-10],[4-4],Yes,Claviform | Subutriform | Subfusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Subutriform | Subfusiform | Metuloid,[45-70],[11-21],Yes,[1-2],n/a,Yes,Claviform | Subutriform | Subfusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Calcareous soil,Oak | Willow | Alder | Poplar,[18-31],[18-31],Equal | Submarginate bulbous,n/a,n/a,Not distinctive | Spermatic,,,,"Easily recognised because of the combination of greyish lamellae and very small spores. Macroscopically it is not unlike I. trechispora (Berk.) P. Karst., which has, however, nodulose spores. Inocybe ochroalba Bruylants differs in having larger spores (on average more than 8.0 microns long) and broader cystidia; I. pelargonium Kuehner differs in having a different smell and whitish to cream lamellae. Inocybe langei has often been confused with I. hirtella Bres. var hirtella, e.g. by J. Lange (Fl. agar. dan. 3: 78. 1938), but the latter species has a more squamulose pileus, whitish lamellae, a different smell and slightly larger spores. Spores measurements as given by the Danish author are, however, often somewhat too small and this might explain Lange's misinterpretation.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 204-205",,,,
  +langei R. Heim,Leiospora,Regular | Subamygdaliform,Obtuse,[6-8],[4-5],[1.4-1.8],Smooth,Claviform,[22-28],[7-10],[4-4],Yes,Claviform | Subutriform | Subfusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Subutriform | Subfusiform | Metuloid,[45-70],[11-21],Yes,[1-2],n/a,Yes,Claviform | Subutriform | Subfusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Calcareous soil,Oak | Willow | Alder | Poplar,[18-31],[18-31],Equal | Submarginate bulbous,n/a,n/a,Not distinctive | Spermatic,Inocybe,,,"Easily recognised because of the combination of greyish lamellae and very small spores. Macroscopically it is not unlike I. trechispora (Berk.) P. Karst., which has, however, nodulose spores. Inocybe ochroalba Bruylants differs in having larger spores (on average more than 8.0 microns long) and broader cystidia; I. pelargonium Kuehner differs in having a different smell and whitish to cream lamellae. Inocybe langei has often been confused with I. hirtella Bres. var hirtella, e.g. by J. Lange (Fl. agar. dan. 3: 78. 1938), but the latter species has a more squamulose pileus, whitish lamellae, a different smell and slightly larger spores. Spores measurements as given by the Danish author are, however, often somewhat too small and this might explain Lange's misinterpretation.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 204-205",,,,
   "lapponica Kokkonen & Vauras, sp. nov.",Goniospora,Angular | Nodulose,Subconical | Conical,[8-11.8],[5.7-8],[1.2-1.7],Angular | With few nodules,Claviform,[21-46],[9-14],[2-4],Yes,Utriform | Lageniform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Utriform | Lageniform | Metuloid,[43-79],[10-27],Yes,[2-3.5],n/a,Yes,Claviform | Lageniform | Utriform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes | No,[1-2],n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Alluvial river | Lake shore forests,Birch | Willow,[10-25],[10-25],Not bulbous,n/a,n/a,Not distinctive,Clypeus,,,"Inocybe lapponica is a small northern species much resembling I. acuta and I. acutoides, but it is not restricted to Salix (see Comments relating to I. acutoides and the key for differential diagnosis). The most distinct difference from I. bufonia is that its spores have fewer nodules. The ITS sequences of I. lapponica specimens were identical except for one with a different base (Ruots. 1985 - GenBank JN580837) and one with a gap (Kallio 1962 - JN580838).","Kokkonen, Katri; Vauras, Jukka. Eleven new boreal species of Inocybe with nodulose spores, Mycol Progress (2012) 11:299-341; p. 315-317",,,,
  -leiocephala D.E. Stuntz,Leiospora,Regular | Subamygdaliform,Obtuse | Subconical,[9-11],[5.5-6.5],[1.5-1.9],Smooth,Claviform,[26-37],[8-11],[4-4],Yes,Fusiform | Utriform | Sublageniform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Pyriform | Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Utriform | Sublageniform | Metuloid,[45-82],[13-22],Yes,[2-3],n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Utriform | Sublageniform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Spruce | Oak | Pine | Willow | Dryas octopetala,[9-30],[9-30],Submarginate bulbous,n/a,nitidiuscula,Spermatic,,,,"1) Inocybe leiocephala shows much resemblance to I. nitidiuscula (Britz.) Sacc., but the latter specie differs in being cortinate, having a different stipe covering and spores with a distinctly conical apex. 2) Inocybe tjallingiorum Kuyp. comes also close to I. leiocephala, but differs in having shorter cystidia and somewhat smaller spores. 3) The spore apex in I. leiocephala varies from almost obtuse to indistinctly conical. Variants with the latter character are occasionally met in the dunes of West Europe, and have been described by Bon (in Docs mycol. 14(53): 35. 1984) as var. subconicospora. However, intermediate cases do also occur and for that reason no taxonomic significance can be given to this character difference.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 190-192",,,,
  +leiocephala D.E. Stuntz,Leiospora,Regular | Subamygdaliform,Obtuse | Subconical,[9-11],[5.5-6.5],[1.5-1.9],Smooth,Claviform,[26-37],[8-11],[4-4],Yes,Fusiform | Utriform | Sublageniform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Pyriform | Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Utriform | Sublageniform | Metuloid,[45-82],[13-22],Yes,[2-3],n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Utriform | Sublageniform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Spruce | Oak | Pine | Willow | Dryas octopetala,[9-30],[9-30],Submarginate bulbous,n/a,nitidiuscula,Spermatic,Inocybe,,,"1) Inocybe leiocephala shows much resemblance to I. nitidiuscula (Britz.) Sacc., but the latter specie differs in being cortinate, having a different stipe covering and spores with a distinctly conical apex. 2) Inocybe tjallingiorum Kuyp. comes also close to I. leiocephala, but differs in having shorter cystidia and somewhat smaller spores. 3) The spore apex in I. leiocephala varies from almost obtuse to indistinctly conical. Variants with the latter character are occasionally met in the dunes of West Europe, and have been described by Bon (in Docs mycol. 14(53): 35. 1984) as var. subconicospora. However, intermediate cases do also occur and for that reason no taxonomic significance can be given to this character difference.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 190-192",,,,
   leptocystis G.F. Atk.,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Conical,[7.5-10],[4.5-6],[1.5-1.9],Smooth,Claviform,[24-30],[7-9],[4-4],Yes,Claviform | Subutriform,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Cylindrical,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Subutriform,[46-70],[10-19],No,[0.1-0.2],n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Wet soil | Moist places,Conifers,[10-30],[10-30],Not bulbous,n/a,n/a,Faintly acidulous,Inocybe,,,n/a,"Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 111-112",,,,
   leptophylla G.F. Atk.,Goniospora,Ellipsoidal,Conical,[9.5-11],[7-10],n/a,15 or more prominent nodules evently distributed over the surface,Claviform-obpyriform,[22-31],[10-13],[4-4],Yes,Claviform | Obpyriform | Fusiform | Versiform,[30-38.5],[9-15],No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Versiform | Septate,[33-80],[6-16.5],No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Ground,Conifers,[10-15],[10-15],n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Clypeus,,,"Our collection corresponds in all particulars to the type. Boursier and Kuehner (Boursier, J. and Kuehner, R. 1928. Notes sur le genre Inocybe. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 44 : 170-189) and more recently, Enderle and Stangl (Enderle, M. and Stngl, J. 1980-1981. Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Ulmer Pilzflora. Risspilze (Inocyben). Mitt. Vereins Math. Ulm. Heft 31, p. 152, 153, 156) have discussed the differences in interpretation of I. lanuginosa (Fr.) Kummer and associated taxa, including I. casimiri Velen. And I. leptophylla Atk. The latter two may actually be two names for the same fungus, but because neither of us has seen material of I. casimiri, we can only point out the possibility of synonymy.","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes VII., Mycologia, vol. 75, 1983; p. 263-264",,,,
   longicystis G.F. Atk.,Goniospora,Oblong,Conical | Subconical,[8-10.5],[6.5-8],n/a,10 to 14 rather prominent nodules,Claviform,[28-35],[9-11],[4-4],Yes,Claviform | Metuloid,[80-110],[12-18],Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Cylindrical | Metuloid,[55-72],[15-27],Yes | Sparse | No,[0.5-0.7],n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Fir | Conifers,[10-50],[10-50],Rounded,n/a,lanuginosa,n/a,Clypeus,,,"In 1947, through the kindness of the late Dr. H. M. Fitzpatrick, the second author was permitted to study the type of Inocybe longicystis. In the microscopical description given above, the measurements of spores, basidia, and pleurocystidia are taken from the type specimens, as are the drawings of spores and pleurocystidia in Fig. 5B. All other microscopical data are taken from the Nova Scotian collections (DG 1811). The macroscopic description is a composite one, of collections from Nova Scotia, Michigan, and Washington. If our data are compared to those given by Boursier and Kuehner (Boursier, J. and Kuehner, R. 1928. Notes sur le genre Inocybe. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 44 : 170-189; p. 179), and by Pearson (Pearson, A. A. 1946. New records and observations. III. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 29 : 191-210; p. 200), it is evident that I. longicystis is remarkably constant in its main features throughout its wide range. Although in appearance it somewhat resembles I. lanuginosa (Bull. ex Fr.) Kummer, it is amply distinct from that species in microscopical features, and in our opinion should not be attached to it as a form or variety (Heim, R. 1931. Le genre Inocybe. Encyclopedie Mycologique I. P. Lechevalier & Fils, Paris. 429 p.; p. 396).","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes I., Mycologia, vol. 60, 1968; p. 413-415",,,,
  
positive.code: flocculosa var. ferruginea (Bon) Kuyper,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Subconical,[8-10],[4.5-5.5],[1.7-1.9],Smooth,Claviform,[26-31],[8-10],[4-4],Yes,Sublageniform | Fusiform | Utriform,n/a,n/a,Yes | No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Sublageniform | Fusiform | Utriform,[54-78],[14-21],Yes | No,[1-1.5],n/a,Yes,Sublageniform | Fusiform | Utriform,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Oak | Pine,[10-25],[10-25],Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,Inocybe,,,"The arrow was introduced by Kuyper & Vuure (in Persoonia 12: 448. 1985) in order to bring Art. 72. Note 1 of the I.C.B.N. in concurrence with Art. 46. 2) Although these varieties look strikingly different in their macroscopical characters, they are almost cpmpletely identical under the microscope. As there is only one character difference between these three taxa, they are given here the rank of variety. The holotypus of I. pluteoides Hoehn. (Austria, Niederoesterreich, Wienerwald, Pressbaum, 17.X.1906, FH) represents an albino variant of this species. As explained on p. 9, I do not want to confer taxanomic value upon these albinistic variants. This albino variant has also been found in the Netherlands (Ijsselmeerpolders, Oost-Flevoland, Revebos, 6.X.1981, C. Bas 7800). Both var. flocculosa and var. crocifolia were found at this locality.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 160",n/a,"Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 165",,
  flocculosa var. flocculosa Sacc.,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Subconical,[7.5-10.5],[4.5-6],[1.5-2],Smooth,Claviform,[26-34],[8-10],[4-4],Yes,Sublageniform | Lageniform | Subfusiform | Subutriform,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Sublageniform | Lageniform | Subfusiform | Subutriform,[46-87],[12-22],Yes,[3-3.5],n/a,Yes,Sublageniform | Lageniform | Subfusiform | Subutriform,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Calcareous soil,Conifers |Frondose,[7-58],[7-58],Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic | Acidulous,Inocybe,,,"The arrow was introduced by Kuyper & Vuure (in Persoonia 12: 448. 1985) in order to bring Art. 72. Note 1 of the I.C.B.N. in concurrence with Art. 46. 2) Although these varieties look strikingly different in their macroscopical characters, they are almost cpmpletely identical under the microscope. As there is only one character difference between these three taxa, they are given here the rank of variety. The holotypus of I. pluteoides Hoehn. (Austria, Niederoesterreich, Wienerwald, Pressbaum, 17.X.1906, FH) represents an albino variant of this species. As explained on p. 9, I do not want to confer taxanomic value upon these albinistic variants. This albino variant has also been found in the Netherlands (Ijsselmeerpolders, Oost-Flevoland, Revebos, 6.X.1981, C. Bas 7800). Both var. flocculosa and var. crocifolia were found at this locality.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 160","1) Inocybe flocculosa is a rather variable species and several mycologists have tried to arrive at a satisfactory taxonomy of this complex. Stangl & Veselsky (in Cerka Mycol. 31 : 15-27, 1977) asserted that 5 different species could be recognised. These species were said to differ in spore-form (length/breadth-ratio) and ecological preference. However, my observation failed to confirm their results as both characters were found to be far more variable and without correlation. For that reason their taxonomy of this complex is not accepted here. In a previous publication (in Persoonia 12 : 385. 1985) I considered I. dentifera to represent an autonomous species. However, after the completion of the manuscript, more material came to my attention, and these additional collections showed that the appendiculate-dentate pileal margin was overrated as a taxonomic criterion. For that reason I now reduce I. dentifera in the synonymy of I. flocculosa. 2) Slender forms with yellowish tinges in the pileus often resemble I. auricoma (Batsch) J. Lange, but can be separated on account of their somewhat larger, distinctly lageniform pleurocystidia. The pileus of I. flocculosa is somewhat more squamulose too. 3) A variant with a well-developed velipellis has been described under the misapplied name I. abjecta (P. Karst.) Sacc., e.g. by Lange (Fl. Agar. Dan. 3 : 73. 1938) and Kuehner (in Bull. Soc. Nat. Oyonnax 9 (Suppl.) : 79. 1955). Such variants also possess somewhat smaller spores and cystidia than typical var. flocculosa. As some overlap in the critical characters can be observed, such variants are not given independent status for the time being. However, more material might indicate that they are better recognised as an autonomous form.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 159-163",,
  fraudans (Britzelm.) Sacc.,Leiospora,Amygdaliform,Papilla,[8-12],[5.5-8],[1.3-1.7],Smooth,Claviform,[28-43],[8-12],[4-4],Yes,Fusiform | Claviform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Spheropedunculate,n/a,n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Claviform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,[38-83],[14-26],Yes,[2-3],n/a,No,Caulocystidioid hairs,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Calcareous soil,Beech | Oak | Spruce | Pine | Linden,[19-86],[19-86],Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Peruvian balsam,Inocybe,,,"1) As will be explained on p. 232, I consider the name Inocybe pyriodora (Pers. : Fr.) Kumm. a nomen dubium. For that reason a new name was needed. The oldest available is based on Agaricus fraudans Britz., a name also neotypified by me (see above). 2) Most mycologists have been inclined to recognise two different species based on differences in habit and pileal covering. The same I. pyriodora was used for the smaller taxon with a somewhat appressedly scaly pileus, whereas the name I. incarnata was used for the robust species with a smooth, even somewhat greasy pileus. However, I came to the conclusion that this character difference is at least partly phenotypically determined. Moreover, too many intermediates were encountered (even in collections found at the same locality in different years) to allow for taxonomic separation of these variants. 3)  Variants without or with only a faint smell show less distinct reddening of the contest.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 78-80",,,,
  frigidula J. Favre,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Subconical,[10-12],[6-7],[1.6-1.8],Smooth,Claviform,[25-33],[9-11],[4-4],Yes,Cylindrical | Claviform | Fusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Claviform | Fusiform | Metuloid,[42-77],[20-29],Yes,[2-3],n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Claviform | Fusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Soil,Dryas octopetala | Willow | Pine,[8-20],[8-20],Equal | Somewhat broadened at base,n/a,n/a,Faint | Subspermatic,,,,"The macroscopical description is partly based on Favre (l.c.). Easily recognised because of its very broad cystidia resembling those of I. serotina Peck. Alpine variants of I. inodora Velen. (see p. 171), another species with broad cystidia, differ in having a stipe that is pruinose over half-way to pruinose throughout.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 165-166",,,,
  fulvella Bres.,Goniospora,Irregularly polygonal | Subrectangle,Conical,[8-10],[6-7],n/a,"7 to 8 prominent, obtuse nodules",Claviform,[23-33],[8-11],[4-4],Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[40-50],[12-18],Yes | No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Diversiform,[22-40],[9-14],Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[48-62],[9-16],Yes | No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Versiform | Claviform | Cylindrical | Fusiform,[10-110],[5.5-9],No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Ground,Birch | Beech | Maple,[8-10],[8-10],Not bulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,Clypeus,,,"There are very few Inocybes with angular-nodulose spores that have purplish or lavender colors. This one is well characterized by its small size and reddish umber, fibrillose pileus. A previous report of it from Washington (Stuntz, D. E. 1947. Studies in the Genus Inocybe. I. New and noteworthy species from Washington. Mycologia 39 : 21-55; p. 32) is incorrect ; the specimens cited have the stipe pruinose in its entire length, and lack lavender colors. There appears to be no other report of I. fulvella from Canada, as far as we can ascertain.","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes V., Mycologia, vol. 72, 1980; p. 672-673",,,,
  furfurea var. furfurea Kuehner,Leiospora,Regular | Subamygdaliform,Obtuse | Conical,[7.5-9],[4.5-5],[1.5-1.9],Smooth,Claviform,[26-31],[8-10],[4-4],Yes,Cylindrical | Subfusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Subpyriform | Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Subfusiform | Metuloid,[55-73],[11-19],Yes,[0.5-1],n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Subfusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Calcareous soil,Beech | Oak | Blue-beech | Hazel | Basswood,[9-24],[9-24],Not bulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,Inocybe,,,"The structure of the pileipellis of this species, consisting of short and inflated elements, is reminiscent of that of Sect. Petiginosae. Stipe colour would support such a classification.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 184","As no mention is made of a discolouration of the young lamellae in the original description of I. furfurea (Kuehner in Bull. Soc. Nat Oyonnax 9 (Suppl.): 15-17. 1955), it is supposed to be absent. However, this character needs to be assessed from fresh material, and it might well be that further investigations will result in the abandonment of var. rufotacta.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 184-185",,
  furfurea var. rufotacta (Schwoebel & Stangl) Kuyper,Leiospora,Regular | Subamygdaliform,Obtuse | Subconical,[8-9.5],[5-5.5],[1.6-1.7],Smooth,Claviform,[23-30],[8-11],[4-4],Yes,Cylindrical | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Pyriform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Metuloid,[50-62],[14-18],Yes,[1-1.5],n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Oak | Blue-beech,[6-32],[6-32],Not bulbous,n/a,n/a,Faint acidulous,Inocybe,,,"The structure of the pileipellis of this species, consisting of short and inflated elements, is reminiscent of that of Sect. Petiginosae. Stipe colour would support such a classification.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 184",The macroscopical description has been copied from Schwoebel & Stangl (l.c.).,"Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 186",,
  fuscicothurnata Grund & D.E. Stuntz,Leiospora,Inequilaterally | Amygdaliform,Obtuse | Subconical,[8-11],[4.5-5.5],n/a,Smooth,Claviform,[25-30],[8-9],[4-4],Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[20-40],[5-15],Yes | No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[45-65],[15-22],Yes | No,[0.5-1],n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Claviform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes | No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Hemlock,[10-15],[10-15],Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,,,,"The distinctives features of this Inocybe are its fuscous pileus, stipe with fuscous sheath and purple-tinged apex, and large, thin-walled cystidia. Its nearest relative in the I. obscura complex is I. cincinnatula Kuehner, which has differently colored pileus and stipe and thick-walled cystidia. Also, in I. fuscicothurnata the stem sheath is continuous in its lower half, whereas in I. cincinnatula the sheath very soon breaks up into brown fibrillose streaks scattered over the lower part of the stipe. Another Inocybe that may be related to I. fuscicothurnata is I. virgata Atk. We have compared our material with a fragment of the type of I. virgata and find no significant difference in spores or cystidia. Since both species have the pileus and stipe fuscous, the principal distinction between them would seem to be the purplish apex of the stipe in I. fuscicothurnata.","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes III., Mycologia, vol. 67, 1975; p. 27-28",,,,
  fuscidula var. bisporigera Kuyper,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Conical,[10-14.5],[5.5-7],[1.7-2],Smooth,Claviform,[26-35],[7-10],[2-2],Yes,Cylindrical | Subfusiform | Sublageniform,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Subfusiform | Sublageniform,[54-70],[11-18],Yes,[1.5-2],n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Spruce,[20-25],[20-25],Equal,n/a,abjecta,Not distinctive,,,,"The macroscopical description has been copied from Lange (Fl. agar. dan. 5: 101. 1940). The type collection is very scanty, consisting of one small fragment of a lamella only.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 156-157",,,,
  fuscidula var. fuscidula Velen.,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Conical | Subconical,[7.5-11],[4.5-6],[1.5-2],Smooth,Claviform,[26-36],[9-12],[4-4],Yes,Cylindrical | Fusiform | Subutriform | Sublageniform,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Pyriform | Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Fusiform | Subutriform | Sublageniform,[41-75],[11-22],Yes,[1.5-2],n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Fusiform | Subutriform | Sublageniform,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Calcareous soil,Beech | Oak | Birch | Spruce | Larch,[15-43],[15-43],Subbulbous,n/a,abjecta,Subspermatic,,,,"1) Inocybe fuscidula is very variable in its macroscopical habit. The variant most commonly encountered in western Europe is characterised by a slender habit, dark brown pileus and a relatively long stipe. It often grows under frondose trees on rather damp soil. This variant is well illustrated by Heim and Lange as I. descissa var. brunneoatra. In central Europe a more robust variant is encountered with a stouter habit, a somewhat to distinctly paler pileus (depending on the development of the velipellis) and relatively short and firm stipe. It grows mostly under conifers but can also be encountered under frondose trees. The illustration by Bresadola (sub nom. I. rimosa) is characteristic for this variant. Although the extremes of these variants are macroscopically strikingly different, they hardly differ in microscopical characters. Intermediates between the extremes are repeatedly encountered, and for that reason no formal status has been given to those variants. The conspecificity of I. virgatula and I. hypophaea has also been confirmed by Kuehner (in Bull. Soc. Nat. Oyonnax 9 (Suppl.) : 59-63. 1955) and Furrer-Ziogas (pers. Comm.). The sole difference between both variants is to be found in the development of the velipellis, resulting in either a distinctly umbonate, brown rimulose pileus, or a sordid isabella-brown pileus without umbo. Intermediates are not seldomly encountered, even within a group that seems to originate from one mycelium. 2) Inocybe pseudodestricta is closely related to I. fuscidula, but differs in having a rather shiny, brown pileus often mixed with reddish tinges, yellowish lamellae and a stipe with pinkish tinges. Inocybe nitidiuscula differs in having reddish tinges at the apex of the stipe and somewhat larger spores.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 153-156",,,,
  fuscodisca (Peck) Massee,Leiospora,Inequilaterally | Amygdaliform,Obtuse | Subconical,[8-10],[4.5-5.5],n/a,Smooth,Claviform,[21-24],[6.5-8],[2-4],Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[18-33],[10-13],Yes | No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[45-77],[12-30],Yes | Sparse | No,[1-2],n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Claviform | Fusoid | Metuloid,[20-85],[14-20],Yes | No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Needles,Spruce,[10-30],[10-30],Equal,n/a,geophylla,Spermatic,,,,"In wet weather the surface of the pileus feels lubricous to viscid, but the pileal cuticule definitely is not a gelatinous pellicle. In young carpophores with unexpanded pilei the pileal cuticle is continuous with a similar layer that sheathes the basal portion of the stipe and like the pileal surface is subviscid when wet. When the pileus expands this enveloping layer ruptures at the pileal margin and collapses on the stipe in an annular zone of subviscid streaks or patches. In these particulars as well as in the size and type of spore, and nature of the pleurocystidia, Inocybe fuscodisca resembles I. geophylla (Sow. Ex Fr.) Kummer, and we are inclined to think it is closely related to the latter species. This appears to be the first report of I. fuscodisca from Nova Scotia, but the species is widely distributed in North America, having been found in New York, Tennessee, Michigan, California and Washington.","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes II., Mycologia, vol. 62, 1970; p. 931-932",,,,
  gausapata Kuehner,Leiospora,Profile slightly rounded dorsally | Deeply convex ventrally,Conical | Subconical,[6.5-10],[4.5-6.5],n/a,Smooth,Cylindrical | Ventricose | Subclaviform,[22-28],[8-12],[4-4],Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[45-60],[13-22],Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,[20-30],[11-15],Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[45-58],[12-19],Yes,[3-4],n/a,Yes,Claviform | Metuloid,[27-45],[9-22],Yes | No,[0.5-1.5],n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Hemlock,[10-25],[10-25],Not bulbous,n/a,pallidipes,Spermatic,,,,"Inocybe gausapata and I. pallidipes Ellis & Everh. resemble each other macroscopically and cannot be separated on that basis. As we have not seen specimens of I. gausapata, we rely on the microscopical data furnished in the protolog (Ellis, J. B., and Everhart, B. M. 1889. Some new species of hymenomycetous fungi. J. Mycol. 5 : 24-29) making it possible to compare them with the corresponding data available from examination of a syntype of I. pallidipes. The two species can be distinguished by differences in their spores and pleurocystidia. Spores of I. pallidipes are slightly longer and narrower than those of I. gausapata, resulting in a different appearance in lateral outline. Pleurocystidia of I. pallidipes are ventricose without a neck, and have walls considerably thicker (4-7 micron) than those of I. gausapata. It should be noted that the measurements of spores given in the description of I. pallidipes (Ellis, J. B., and Everhart, B. M. 1889. Some new species of hymenomycetous fungi. J. Mycol. 5 : 24-29) are incorrect because they do not match the syntype. As far as we know this is the first report of I. gausapata from North America.","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes VI., Mycologia, vol. 73, 1981; p. 656-658",,,,
  geophylla var. geophylla (Bull.) P. Kumm.,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Obtuse,[7-10.5],[4.5-6],[1.5-1.9],Smooth,Claviform,[22-33],[7-11],[4-4],Yes,Subfusiform | Subutriform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Pyriform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Subfusiform | Subutriform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,[38-76],[10-25],Yes,[1-2],n/a,Yes,Subfusiform | Subutriform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Calcareous soil,Oak | Beech | Pine | Spruce | Blue-beech | Birch | Basswood | Larch,[9-35],[9-35],Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,Inocybe,,,"Nomenclatural note : The extensive synonymy bears witness of the convoluted history of the correct name of this species. First of all it should be noted that the epithets geophilus and geophyllus are not to be considered as orthographic variants as they have a completely different meaning : geophilus meaning earth-loving, geophyllus meaning lamellae being earth-coloured. Bulliard (Herb. France : pl. 522, f. 2. 1791) illustrated the white variety of this species under the name Agaricus geophilus. As only a macroscopical illustration without details aiding identification (Art. 42.2 & 44.2) was provided, this name is invalid. The next author referring to that species was Sowerby (Col. Fig. English Fungi 2 : 4. 1799) who depicted the violaceous variety and provided a formal diagnosis under the name A. geophyllus. As noted above, this epithet is not an orthographic error of Bulliard's name, and Sowerby's species must therefore be typified with the violaceous variety. Persoon (Syn. Meth. Fung. : 340. 1801) referred to Sowerby's violaceous taxon, which he had formerly described as Agaricus affinis, but preferred to use the epithet geophilus. The name Agaricus geophilus Pers. is clearly illegitimate, being a superfluous name change for A. affinis. However, this Persoonian name barred the legitimacy of A. geophilus Bull. in Ventenat (Hist. Champ. : 546. 1812), intented as a validation of A. geophilus Bull. 1791, and typified by the white variety. This Gordian knot was finally cut by Fries (Syst. mycol. 1. 258. 1821 and Elench. Fung. 1 : 33. 1828), who sanctioned the name A. geophyllus, and typified it with the white variety. He make even explicit that his use of the epithet geophyllus for the taxon typified by Bulliard's white variety was not a mistake, but a deliberate choice, as he felt that the epithet should espress the earth-colour of the lamellae. As Fries's name A. geophyllus is sanctioned, the name A. geophyllus Sow. must be rejected as it is a homonym of the Friesian name. Summarizing the above, it can be concluded that Agaricus geophyllus is the correct name, that the epithet must be ascribed to Fries solely, and that the species must be typified by Bulliard's illustration (pl. 522, as A. geophilus).","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 85-86","1) Old specimens sometimes become slightly hygrophanous and then show some striation at the margin of the pileus. No toxonomic value can be given to this character. 2) Young specimens of I. whitei (B. & Br.) Sacc. f. armeniaca (Huijsman) Kuyp. are not always separable from I. geophylla var. geophylla, although a prominent and even subacute papilla is almost always indicative of the former species. 3) Inocybe posterula (Britz.) Sacc. differs from yellowish variants of I. geophylla var. geophylla in being more robust, having spores with a somewhat subconical apex and more thick-walled pleurocystidia. The covering of the stipe is also somewhat different. 4) Inocybe phaeodisca var. geophylloides Kuehner has a somewhat more radially rimose pileus and spores wih a conical apex.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 86-89",,
  
negative.code: phaeodisca var. phaeodisca Kuehner,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform | Partly with a suprahilar depression,Conical,[8.5-10.5],[4.5-5.5],[1.7-2],Smooth,Claviform,[24-33],[8-10],[4-4],Yes,Cylindrical | Subfusiform | Subutriform | Sublageniform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Subfusiform | Subutriform | Sublageniform | Metuloid,[46-74],[13-17],Yes,[1.6-2],n/a,No,Caulocystidioid hairs,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Ground,Beech | Birch | Alder | Oak,[20-35],[20-35],Not bulbous,n/a,n/a,Faint | Subspermatic,Inocybe,,,"The macroscopical description is partly based on the description given by Kuehner (in Bull. Soc. Nat. Oyonnax 9 (Suppl.) 75. 1955). 2) Inocybe phaeodisca var. diosma Reumaux (in Docs mycol. 14 (54-55) : 30. 1984) differs in slender basidiocarps (pileus 20-30 mm; stipe 80-90 x 3-5 mm) and complex smell being a mixture of a goat-like smell and a Pelargonium-smell. This local variant could deserve autonomous taxonomic status, but more material is needed for a better evaluation.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 122-124",,,,
  phaeoleuca Kuehner,Leiospora,Inequilaterally | Amygdaliform,Obtuse | Subconical,[8-11],[5-6],n/a,Smooth,Claviform,[27-33],[9-10],[4-4],Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[20-35],[8-16],Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[60-75],[12-25],Yes,[3-5],n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Fusiform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Pyriform | Metuloid,[40-45],n/a,Yes | No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Moss | Needles,Mixed,[35-60],[35-60],Submarginate bulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,,,,"As far as we know, this is the first report of Inocybe phaeoleuca from North America. It is a species readily recognized by the smooth, brown pileus, and white, entirely pruinose stipe with thick-walled metuloid at th base. The Nova Scotian specimens correspond very well to Kuehner's description (Kuehner, R. 1955. Complements a la Flore Analytique V. Inocybe leispores cystidies. Bull. Soc. Nat. D'Oyonnax, Mem. Hors ser. 1. Imprimerie Berthod, Bourg. 95 p.; 45 p.).","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes I., Mycologia, vol. 60, 1968; p. 421-422",,,,
  "porcorum Vauras & Kokkonen, sp. nov.",Goniospora,Nodulose | Angular,Subconical | Conical,[9.6-12.1],[6.2-7.9],[1.3-1.7],"With several hemispherical, fairly small nodules",Claviform,[26-41],[9-13],[4-4],Yes,Fusiform | Lageniform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,[40-78],[15-25],Yes | Sparse | No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Lageniform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,[53-96],[11-24],Yes | Sparse | No,[1-2],n/a,Yes,Lageniform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes | Sparse | No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,Soil,Pine | Spruce | Birch | Willow,[15-35],[15-35],Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Acidulous,Clypeus,,,"Inocybe porcorum is characterised by fairly large spores and pleurocystidia, which to some extent resemble those of I. decipiens Bres. However, the latter species has larger spores and caulocystidia over half-way down the stipe. I. curvipes P.Karst., a common species in southern Finland, differs, for example, in its silvery greybrown colour at the stipe base and its pleurocystidia with subacute apices. I. proximella, a species with caulocystidioid hairs tapering to their apices, is more greyish and usually paler in colour, not squamulose, has somewhat smaller spores with larger nodules and smaller Q values, and wider and shorter pleurocystidia on average. In our material of sequenced species, I. proximella is the closest to I. porcorum, but showed as many as 35 deviating bases and 12 insertions/deletions.","Kokkonen, Katri; Vauras, Jukka. Eleven new boreal species of Inocybe with nodulose spores, Mycol Progress (2012) 11:299-341; p. 325-326",,,,
  posterula (Britzelm.) Sacc.,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Conical | Subconical,[7.5-9.5],[4.5-6],[1.5-1.8],Smooth,Claviform,[23-30],[7-9],[4-4],Yes,Fusiform | Utriform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Utriform | Metuloid,[47-66],[12-21],Yes,[1.5-2.5],n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Utriform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Soil,Spruce | Pine | Larch,[25-60],[25-60],Not bulbous,n/a,n/a,Indistinctly spermatic,Inocybe,,,"1) Inocybe xanthodisca Kuehner is considered a synonym of I. posterula on account of their more or less identical macroscopical characters. I have been unable, however, to obtain authentic material of I. xanthodisca. According to Huijsman (pers. comm.) who studied material from Bresadola's herbarium at S, I. geophylla var. lutescens is identical with I. posterula. 2) Inocybe posterula often resembles I. geophylla (Fr.: Fr.) Kumm., but can be recognised by the less sericeous-smooth and more yellow pileus, the more robust habit, and the spores with a more conical apex. The latter character, however, is rather diffucult to observe, as the apex of the spore of I. posterula is only slightly conical. Inocybe phaeodisca var. geophylloides Kuehner differs in slender habit, stipe with reddish tinges at apex, and somewhat longer spores. Its ecology is somewhat different too.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 146-147",,,,
  "praecox Kropp, Matheny et Nanagyulyan, sp. nov.",Leiospora,Amygdaliform | Elliptical in outline,Obtuse | Subobtuse,[7.5-10],[4.5-5.5],n/a,Smooth,Claviform,[25-30],[6-10],[4-4],Yes,Clavate | Fusiform-ventricose | Ovate | Metuloid,[32-65],[12-17],Yes,[0.5-2],n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Clavate | Fusiform-ventricose | Metuloid,[44-70],[12-18],Yes,[1-1.5],n/a,Yes,Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Soil during spring,Douglas-fir | Red alder | Western hemlock | Arbutus menziesii,[20-60],[20-60],Equal | Marginate bulbous,n/a,n/a,None,,,,"Inocybe praecox is thus far known only from the Pacific Northwest of the United States. It is characterized by its vernal fruiting habit and its relatively light yellow-brown, slightly greasy pileus that lacks a velipellis and by having a basal bulb on the stipe. Specimens of I. praecox fit within I. splendens senso lato but differ from it phylogenetically. It differs from I. alluvionalis primarily by lacking a velipellis and by lacking the umbrinous pileus that develops in I. alluvionalis. Inocybe splendens sensu Heim (1931) has a darkly pigmented pileus, while I. terrifera lacks a basal bulb on its stipe and has a velipellis. A number of North American species also fit within section Spendentes of Inocybe that could be potentially interpreted as I. praecox. Among these I. bakeri is differentiated by its larger spores while I. kauffmanii has a cream-colored pileus and lacks a basal bulb on the stipe. The single specimen in clade 2 from Washington that is identifiable as I. splendens sensu lato is also at first glance strikingly similar to I. praecox. This fungus fruits in spring in the same region and has a stature and coloration similar to I. praecox. Yet it is phylogenetically distinct from I. praecox and, even though more material is required to fully characterize or formally describe this taxon, a closer examination indicates that some morphological differences exist that allows it to be distinguished from I. praecox. The taxon represented by clade 2 has a distinct velipellis and its pileus becomes rimose toward the margin, while I. praecox lacks both characters. This taxon is probably undescribed, however more collections are required before we can fully characterize or formally describe it. It should be pointed out that the name Inocybe abietis Kuehner originally was applied to some of the material we now refer to as I. praecox in Matheny et al. (2002) and Matheny (2005).","Kropp, Bradley R.; Matheny, P. Brandon,; Nanagyulyan, Siranush G. Phylogenetic taxonomy of the Inocybe splendens group and evolution of supersection ""Marginatae"", Mycologia, 102(3), 2010, pp. 560-573 ; p.570-571",,,,
  prominens Kauffman,Goniospora,Quadrangular | Polyhedral,Conical | Subconical,[7-9],[5.5-8],n/a,"8 to 9 low, rounded nodules",Claviform | Inflated apex,[24-28],[8-10],[4-4],Yes,Claviform | Fusiform | Metuloid,[45-50],[14-16],No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,[22-23],[6.5-11],Yes,Claviform | Fusiform | Metuloid,[46-71],[11-19],Yes | No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Versiform | Claviform,[45-70],[9-16],No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Grass,Oak,[10-35],[10-35],Not bulbous,n/a,n/a,Not distinctive,Clypeus,,,"This Inocybe was reported from Nova Scotia by Smith and Wehmeyer (Smith, A. H., and Wehmeyer, L. E.. 1936. Contribution to a study of the fungous flora of Nova Scotia. II. Agaricaceae and Boletaceae. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Letters 21 : 163-197) in 1936, but without description. Our specimens are not prominently umbonate, but there is provision for this in the protolog. Kauffman (Kauffman, C. H. 1924. Inocybe. North Amer. Fl. 10(4) : 227-260) says ""usually prominently umbonate. "" The microscopic features of ACAD 10300 are in such complete agreement with those of the holotype, however, that we have no doubt that our identification is correct.","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes VI., Mycologia, vol. 73, 1981; p. 664-665",,,,
  proximella P. Karst.,Goniospora,Strongly nodulose | Hemispherical,Subconical | Conical,[7.8-11.2],[6.2-8.7],[1.1-1.6],Medium-sized to rather large nodules,Claviform,[25-41],[9-12],[4-4],Yes,Lageniform | Cylindrical | Fusoid | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes | Sparse | No,[2-3],n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Lageniform | Cylindrical | Fusoid | Metuloid,[50-85],[14-29],Yes | Sparse | No,[1-2.5],n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Cylindrical | Clavate | Flexuous | Septae | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,No,[1-2],n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Calcareous soil,Spruce | Mainly in forests,[18-48],[18-48],"Wide, widening slightly downwards",n/a,n/a,Acidulous | Spermatic | Not distinctive,Clypeus,,,"Inocybe proximella has been known by Finnish mycologists as a spruce forest species, but the limits of its variation have been obscure. I. striata has had much the same status in southern Europe. It appeared conspecific with I. proximella in our examinations, as did I. umbrinodisca. We thus reduce these to synonyms. We have not studied the type of Inocybe striata, but have relied on type descriptions by Bresadola (1927-33) and Bizio and Marchetti (1998), and considered how the Bizio's collections agree with these descriptions. Bizio sent us four recent collections of I. striata that we subjected to ITS analysis. Of these, two Italian and the Croatian specimen agreed in cystidia and reasonably well in spores with the type descriptions of I. striata, as well as with I. proximella. They deviated from the type of I. proximella in their ITS sequences by one or two bases and a gap of three bases (GenBank JN580841, JN580842, JN580843). However, the Croatian and an Italian sequence were identical with some other Finnish sequences of I. proximella. Compared with the type, all the other I. proximella sequences had the same gap of three bases including a collection of Karsten from 1895 (from that collection only the ITS1 succeeded - JN580844). The fourth analysed specimen sent by Bizio from Italy had shorter fusiform cystidia and spores with smaller, irregular nodules, and it diverged greatly in the ITS from the I. proximella type, representing an unknown species. In further support, Bizio and Marchetti (1998) mentioned that the stipe bases of the type fungi of I. striata were ochraceous. This fits our observations of I. proximella. According to Stangl (1976), both Inocybe striata and I. striatorimosa P.D.Orton possibly belong to the I. acuta complex. We have studied a part of the holotype of I. striatorimosa (K). This belongs to the I. soluta Velen. complex, differing from all the species we describe here. The ITS2 sequence of I. umbrinodisca failed, but the ITS1 was identical with most Finnish sequences of I. proximella. Microscopic and macroscopic features and habitat information agreed, except that the odour of I. umbrinodisca was mentioned as fruity acidulous or at times subpelargonious (Kuehner 1988). Kuehner collected I. umbrinodisca under Picea. In conclusion, Inocybe proximella is a rather variable species with a wide distribution. It has typically a rather robust appearance, a weakly fibrillose and rather pale, grey brown cap, often a yellow to ochre tinge at the stipe base, and fairly large spores with rather large nodules. It is likely that it is the most common of all species treated in this paper. However, it is not a common species in Finland. It can be confused with I. silvae-herbaceae, for example. See our comments about I. silvae-herbaceae for comparison. The ITS sequences of the examined one Swedish and 20 Finnish collections of I. proximella, excluding the type, were identical (JV26381 in the phylogram - GenBank JN580845), except for one base difference in collection JV15349 (JN580846), and an insertion/deletion of one base in two specimens (JV21832 - JN580847, KK223/08 - JN580850). An Estonian (JN580848) and a Norwegian (JN580849) specimen both differed by one (different) base from most Finnish specimens. I. proximella is rather closely related to I. giacomi: the ITS sequences of I. giacomi deviated by 22-23 bases and 5 insertions/deletions from the sequence of I. proximella type.","Kokkonen, Katri; Vauras, Jukka. Eleven new boreal species of Inocybe with nodulose spores, Mycol Progress (2012) 11:299-341; p. 318-321",,,,
  pruinosa R. Heim,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform | Irregular | Indistinct suprahilar depression,Subconical,[11-17],[5-6.5],[1.9-2.8],Smooth,Claviform,[28-37],[9-13],[4-4],Yes,Claviform | Fusiform | Subutriform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Pyriform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Fusiform | Subutriform | Metuloid,[45-77],[13-30],Yes,[3-5],n/a,Yes,Claviform | Fusiform | Subutriform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,Caulocystidioid hairs,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Sandy places,Pine | Spruce | Oak,[18-32],[18-32],Equal | Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Not distinctive,Inocybe,,,"1) Inocybe halophila has been an enigmatic species that has been variously interpreted. I. concur with Romagnesi (pers. comm.) who asserted that I. halophila is only a variant of I. pruinosa with somewhat less prominent velipellis. I. studied several collections in his herbarium (e.g. Romagnesi 73.33 & 74.147) which corresponded in all respects to Heim's protologue of I. halophila. 2) Inocybe pruinosa differs from the North American I. bulbosa Peck (in Bull. Torrey bot. Club. 36: 333. 1909) in having somewhat smaller cystidia, larger spores and an (almost) equal stipe. Inocybe longispora M. Lange (in Medd. Groenland 148: 13. 1957) shows some superficial resemblance to I. pruinosa but differs in narrower spores (4.5-5.5 microns broad), less thick-walled pleurocystidia and a stipe that is pruinose over only 1/10th of its length.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 169-171",,,,
  pseudodestricta Stangl & J. Veselsky,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Subconical,[8.5-11],[5-6],[1.5-1.9],Smooth,Claviform,[26-34],[8-11],[4-4],Yes,Subutriform | Subclaviform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Subutriform | Subclaviform | Metuloid,[50-70],[13-23],Yes,[1-2],n/a,Yes,Subutriform | Subclaviform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,Caulocystidioid hairs,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Soil,Oak | Birch | Poplar,[12-60],[12-60],Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,Inocybe,,,"Very similar to I. fuscidula Velen., from which it differs in its shiny pileus and yellow-tinged lamellae. The differences between I. pseudodestricta and I. derbschii are very small, the latter species being merely somewhat more yellow-brown. A separation on specific level seems not warranted. More material of this species is needed to judge on the status of this brighter-coloured variant.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 152-153",,,,
  pseudoreducta Stangl & Glowinski,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform,Subconical,[7.5-10],[4.5-6],[1.5-2],Smooth,Claviform,[24-29],[8-10],[4-4],Yes,Fusiform | Ventricose | Subfusiform | Subutriform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Ventricose | Subfusiform | Subutriform | Metuloid,[50-70],[16-24],Yes,[1.5-2.5],n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Ventricose | Subfusiform | Subutriform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Calcareous soil,Beech | Spruce,[20-55],[20-55],Marginate bulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,Inocybe,,,"The macroscopical description is for the greater part taken from Stangl & Glowinski (in Karstenia 21 : 30. 1980). These authors also stated that the walls of the cystidia are yellow in alkaline solution, but this turned out to be an error. I investigated three collections from the type locality, and found the cystidial wall to be almost colourless.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 190",,,,
  "pseudoteraturgus Vauras & Kokkonen, sp. nov.",Goniospora,Strongly nodulose,Subconical | Conical,[7.7-11.1],[6-8],[1.05-1.5],Nodulose,Claviform,[22-33],[9-14],[4-4],Yes,Utriform | Lageniform | Fusiform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,[30-57],[10-20],Yes | No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Utriform | Lageniform | Fusiform | Cylindrical | Metuloid,[49-72],[11-25],Yes,[3-4],n/a,Yes,Cylindrical | Long,[50-100],n/a,No,[0.5-1],n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,"In dry, mesic, and moist forests",Pine | Spruce | Birch,[12-33],[12-33],Equal | Enlarged | Tapering,n/a,n/a,Acidulous | Spermatic | Not distinctive,Clypeus,,,"Inocybe pseudoteraturgus has a scaly pileus and belongs to the Inocybe lanuginosa group. The pileus colour varies from grey brown to dark brown (Online Resource Fig. S16). It can be collected as I. lanuginosa (Bull.: Fr.) P.Kumm., I. leptophylla G.F.Atk., I. relicina (Fr.) Quel. or I. teraturgus, but distinctly differs from them  in its spores and cystidia. The first collections made by J.V. were identified as Inocybe teraturgus, but the type study revealed that the latter species does not have exactly the spores originally drawn by Moser (1992). The ITS sequences of I. pseudoteraturgus and a Finnish collection of I. teraturgus (M.-L. & P. Heinonen 214-95F (TUR), GenBank JN580887) deviated greatly from each other. Inocybe pseudoteraturgus seems to greatly resemble the North American species I. diminuta Peck (Peck 1906), known only from two old collections (Matheny and Kropp 2001). I. pseudoteraturgus differs from the latter in its larger fruitbodies, wider spores with slightly smaller Q-values, and on average longer pleurocystidia with slightly thicker walls. The two other sequenced specimens differed from the type of Inocybe pseudoteraturgus by three common bases and two common insertions, and another also differed by a deletion (GenBank JN580879, JN580880).","Kokkonen, Katri; Vauras, Jukka. Eleven new boreal species of Inocybe with nodulose spores, Mycol Progress (2012) 11:299-341; p. 334-336",,,,
  pudica Kuehner,Leiospora,Inequilaterally | Amygdaliform,Conical,[6.5-11],[4.5-6.5],n/a,Smooth,Claviform,[25-33],[7-9],[2-4],Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[45-50],[19-22],Yes | No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,[22-27],[11-16],Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[45-60],[13-22],Yes,[2-3.5],n/a,Yes,Ventricose | Metuloid,[45-65],[18-27],Yes | No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Ground | Moss,Conifers | Hardwoods,[10-30],[10-30],Equal,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,,,,"The uppermost layer of the pileal surface is composed of similar hyphae to those of the agglutinated sheath at the base of the stipe, a features common to all members of the I. geophylla complex, to which I. pudica belongs. When wet, these layers become lubricous or even rather viscid, but do not constitute a true viscid pellicle. The Nova Scotian specimens do not differ in any significant detail from specimens collected along the west coast of the United States, where I. pudica is one of the commonest of the Inocybes. It apparently is rare east of the Rocky Mts. Kauffman (Kauffman, C. H. 1924. Inocybe. North Amer. Fl. 10(4) : 227-260) did not include this taxon of the I. geophylla complex in his monograph, but he may have included I. pudica in his concept of I. godeye Gillet, for which he gives two spore sizes, one corresponding to that of I. pudica and the other to that of I. godeye.","Grund, D.W.; Stuntz, D.E. Nova Scotian Inocybes VI., Mycologia, vol. 73, 1981; p. 661-662",,,,
  purpureobadia Esteve-Rav. & A. Caball.,Goniospora,Angular | Elongated,Subconical | Conical,[8.1-11.4],[4.8-6.4],[1.4-2.1],"With few low nodules, at times a bit undulating",Claviform,[23-38],[7-13],[4-4],Yes,Lageniform | Utriform | Clavate | Metuloid,[40-66],[9-19],Yes,[2-2.5],n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,Lageniform | Utriform | Clavate | Metuloid,[39-75],[10-21],Yes,[1.5-2.5],n/a,Yes,Flexuous | Cylindrical | Lageniform | Utriform | Subglobose | Metuloid,[40-71],[10-19],Yes | No,[1-1.5],n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Calcareous soil | Sandy soil,Pine | Oak,[6-22],[6-22],Equal | Slightly wider,n/a,n/a,Not distinctive | Acidulous,Clypeus,,,"Inocybe purpureobadia is distinguished by its small, dark brown fruitbodies with pale velipellis and weakly angular spores. Our collections lacked the purple tinge often seen in Spanish fruitbodies (Esteve-Raventos and Caballero Moreno 2009). The sequenced Finnish specimen (GenBank JN580876) deviated from the isoparatype (JN580875) by five bases, a deletion and an insertion, but clearly matched in morphology. Drawings of the microscopic features of both are included. The specimens we studied had normal cheilocystidia and not the heterogeneous lamellar edge with violaceous brownish cystidia observed by Esteve-Raventos and Caballero Moreno. Except for the different colour of also other cystidia, our observations agreed with theirs. Pinus sylvestris seems to be the host in Finland and Estonia, and Quercus ilex in Spain. A common feature of the habitats seems to be sandy soils. We found that GenBank had ITS sequences of unidentified fungi collected from an alpine habitat in Austria that deviated by only 6-7 bases and 2-3 gaps from the sequence of the isoparatype of I. purpureobadia (Oberkofler et al. unpublished, GenBank EU516939, EU516943).","Kokkonen, Katri; Vauras, Jukka. Eleven new boreal species of Inocybe with nodulose spores, Mycol Progress (2012) 11:299-341; p. 331-332",,,,
  pusio P. Karst.,Leiospora,Subamygdaliform | Amygdaliform,Subconical | Conical,[7.5-11],[4.5-6],[1.5-2],Smooth,Claviform,[27-32],[8-11],[4-4],Yes,Fusiform | Subfusiform | Subutriform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Pyriform | Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Subfusiform | Subutriform | Metuloid,[41-74],[12-25],Yes,[1-2],n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Subfusiform | Subutriform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,Soil,Oak | Basswood | Beech | Poplar | Pine,[11-35],[11-35],Equal | Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,Inocybe,,,"1) The synonymy of I. obscura var. obscurissima with I. pusio is accepted on account of Kuehner's assertions (in Bull. trimest. Soc. mycol. Fr. 71 : 274. ('1955') 1956). 2) Inocybe pusio is rather variable in its macroscopical habit depending on the degree of development of the velipellis. When the velipellis is comparatively thick and rigid, the underlying pileipellis is more or less fibrillose-subtomentose and at margin not or hardly radially rimulose. Specimens with an early disappearing velipellis are generally somewhat darker and possess a distinctly rimulose to subrimose margin. No taxonomic significance could, however, be accorded to this difference, contrary to the assertion by Reumaux (in Docs mycol. 12(48): 17. ('1982') 1983).","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 147-150",,,,
  queletii Maire & Konr.,Leiospora,Regular | Subamygdaliform,Subobtuse | Subconical,[8-12],[5-7],[1.5-2],Smooth,Claviform,[26-34],[9-12],[4-4],Yes,Fusiform | Sublageniform | Lageniform | Claviform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,Yes,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform,n/a,n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Sublageniform | Lageniform | Claviform | Metuloid,[50-76],[14-21],Yes,[2-3],n/a,Yes,Fusiform | Sublageniform | Lageniform | Claviform | Metuloid,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,Caulocystidioid hairs,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,Soil,Spruce | Fir | Pine,[30-60],[30-60],Equal | Subbulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic,Inocybe,,,"1) According to Huijsman (pers. comm.) some collection lack the velipellis (almost) completely and in such cases the pileus is rather dark brown. No microscopical differences with the typical variant have been found by me. I could not find a description of this dark variant. The collection from the Netherlands differs in being somewhat more slender than the collections from the Jura. A collection from Germany, depicted by Stangl & Veselsky (in Ceska Mykol. 30 : 176. 1978) also shows a rather slender habit. No microscopical differences could be found, however. 2) Judging from the rather short description, I. sambucina var. aestivalis S. Petersen, Danske Agaricaceer: 335 (1911), might be identical with I. queletii, but in the absence of many type-material I regard this name as a nomen dubium. 3) The description by Bresadola (Iconogr. mycol. 15: pl. 750. 1930, sub nom. I. sambucina) most probably refers to I. queletii. Although Bresadola noted the spores to be 10-12 x 6-7 micron (Q about 1.7), he depicted them as having a Q about 2.5. Part of Bresadola's taxon might therefore refer to true I. sambucina (Fr.: Fr.) Quel.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 158-159",,,,
  quietiodor Bon,Leiospora,Not phaseoliform | Hardly phaseoliform,Obtuse,[8-11],[5-6],[1.5-1.9],Smooth,Claviform,[28-39],[9-11],[4-4],Yes,Claviform | Subutriform,[27-58],[10-17],No,[0.5-1.5],n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Claviform | Subutriform,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Calcareous soil,Oak | Chestnut | Beech,[20-41],[20-41],Submarginate bulbous,n/a,n/a,Farinaceous,Inosperma,Rimosae,,"1) Inocybe quietiodor M. Bon differs from I. cookei Bres. var. cookei in having larger, non-phaseoliform spores and a differents smell. However, both species seem to have been confused until recently, as the wide range of spore-dimensions in published descriptions of I. cookei suggest. Bright forms of I. maculata Boud. Differ in having a more acutely conical pileus, slightly darker ochraceous tinges on pileus and stipe, and somewhat more slender phaseoliform spores. 2) More material is needed for a better evaluation of the relationships between I. reisneri Velen. and I. quietiodor.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 48-49",,,,
  reisneri Velen.,Leiospora,Phaseoliform,Obtuse,[8-10.5],[5-6],[1.6-1.9],Smooth,Claviform,[29-38],[9-12],[4-4],Yes,Claviform | Subpyriform,[35-60],[8-14],No,[0.5-1.5],n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Subpyriform,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Chestnut | Beech,[18-40],[18-40],Bulbous,n/a,n/a,Fruit | Disagreable,Inosperma,Rimosae,,"1) Inocybe quietiodor M. Bon comes very close and more collections are needed to evaluate its relationship with I. reisneri. 2) Inocybe vinosistipitata Grund & Stuntz also possesses a violaceous stipe and violaceous lamellae, but differs in having larger spores and broader cheilocystidia.","Kuyper, Thomas W. 1986. A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe : I. subgenus inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe, Rijksherbarium, Leiden, 247 p.; p. 47-48",,,,
  rimosa (Bull.) P. Kumm.,Leiospora,Subphaseoliform,Obtuse | Subconical,[9-15.5],[5.5-8.5],[1.4-2.2],Smooth,Claviform,[26-44],[10-15],[2-4],Yes,Claviform | Pyriform | Cylindrical | Subutriform,[28-80],[9-23],No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,Yes,Claviform | Pyriform | Cylindrical | Subutriform,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,No,n/a,n/a,n/a,n/a,Soil,Frondose | Conifers,[13-110],[13-110],Submarginate bulbous,n/a,n/a,Spermatic | Disagreable,Inosperma,Rimosae,,"1) In my opinion there can hardly be any doubt that the species as depicted by Bulliard sub nomine Agaricus rimosus (Herb. France : pl. 338. 1789) is identical with the taxon commonly called I. fastigiata. The name I. rimosa, being sanctionned, has priority over I. fastigiata.
  