In a Riemannian manifold there is a canonical connection, the Levi-Civita connection, which imposes compatibility with respect to the metric and symmetry. If the Riemannian metric comes from a Hermitian metric on a complex manifold, we would also like some compatibility with respect to the complex structure. More concretely, we're looking for a connection $\nabla$ that is compatible with the Riemannian metric ($\nabla g=0$) and with the Hermitian metric ($\nabla \tilde{h}=0$), which necessarily implies $\nabla\omega=0$.

However, since $\omega(u,v)=g(Ju,v)$, the following relation holds:

and this relation implies that for a Hermitian manifold $(M,J,h)$ the following are equivalent

1. $\nabla J=0$
2. $\nabla \omega=0$
3. $\mathrm{d} \omega=0$

A Kähler manifold is a Hermitian manifold satisfying the equivalent statements above, and in this case the Levi-Civita connection is compatible with the Hermitian metric.
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 9, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 0, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0, "katex": 0, "math-container": 0, "wp-katex-eq": 0, "align": 0, "equation": 0, "x-ck12": 0, "texerror": 0, "math_score": 0.9918649196624756, "perplexity": 105.27385607525129}, "config": {"markdown_headings": false, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "plain"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "warc_path": "s3://commoncrawl/crawl-data/CC-MAIN-2019-04/segments/1547583658844.27/warc/CC-MAIN-20190117062012-20190117084012-00361.warc.gz"}