An accelerating and shrinking train in special relativity

Suppose when a train is at rest, it has a length of $L$. Let the position of the back of the train at any time be $A$, and let the position of the front of the train at any time be $B$.

Now assume a stationary observer on the Earth, O, observes point $A$ to be accelerating at a constant rate, $k$. Now as the train accelerates, O will observe the train to continually shrink, thanks to length contraction. Now since $A$ is measured to accelerate at a constant rate, the position of $B$ will depend on A's acceleration, and the rate of shrinkage.

So the question is, calculate the acceleration of point $B$, as measured by O, given the acceleration of point $A$, and the length of the train, $L$.

-

Suppose when a train is at rest, it has a length of $L$. Let the position of the back of the train at any time be $A$, and let the position of the front of the train at any time be $B$.

In other words, by definition, $B$ and $A$ initially find equal ping durations between each other; $T_{ABA} == T_{BAB} := T$, where $L := \frac{c}{2} T$.

Now assume [...] point $A$ to be accelerating at a constant rate, $k$.

The prescription of "constant acceleration" is conveniently modelled as "constant proper acceleration" corresponding to hyperbolic motion against participants (such as "O") who were initially at rest wrt. $B$ and $A$ and each other (and who remain at rest to each other, as a inertial frame, allowing them to measure, among each other, the relevant distances and durations):

$x_A[ t_O ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{start}} ] := \frac{c^2}{k} \left( \sqrt{ \left(\frac{k}{c} t_O\right)^2 + 1 } - 1 \right)$,

where the relation between the duration $t$ of members of the inertial frame (incl. participant "O"), from starting $A$ until the passage of $A$ at some particular member of the inertial frame, and the correponding duration $\tau_A$ of $A$, from being sent off until passing the particular member of the inertial frame as

$\frac{k}{c} t_O = \text{Sinh}[ \frac{k}{c} \tau_A ]$; and therefore

$x_A[ t_O ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{start}} ] := \frac{c^2}{k} \left( \text{Cosh}[ \frac{k}{c} \tau_A ] - 1 \right)$.

[...] calculate the acceleration of point $B$, as measured by O, given the acceleration of point $A$, and the length of the train, $L$.

The prescription of the length of the train being and remaining "given" is sensibly modelled as the ping duration remaining constant; at least for pings of $A$ to $B$ and echoed back to $A$, (if not the other way around as well); i.e.

$\tau_{A\text{echo reception}} := \tau_{A\text{signal statement}} + T$.

The exchange of pings is considered exchange of light signals; therefore for the corresponding distances and durations determined by the members of the inertial frame holds:

$c := \frac{(x_B[ t_{O\text{reflection}} ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{signal}} ]) + (x_B[ t_{O\text{reflection}} ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{reception}} ])}{t_{O\text{reception}} - t_{O\text{signal}}}$, i.e.

$\text{Sinh}[ \frac{k}{c} (\tau_{A\text{sign}} + T) ] =$
$2 \frac{k}{c^2} \left(x_B[ t_{O\text{refl}} ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{start}} ]\right) - \text{Cosh}[ \frac{k}{c} \tau_{A\text{sign}} ] - \text{Cosh}[ \frac{k}{c} (\tau_{A\text{sign}} + T ) ] + 2$.

Also:

$c := \frac{(x_B[ t_{O\text{refl}} ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{sign}} ])}{t_{O\text{refl}} - t_{O\text{sign}}}$, i.e.

$\frac{k}{c} t_{O\text{refl}} - \text{Sinh}[ \frac{k}{c} \tau_{A\text{sign}} ] = \frac{k}{c^2} \left(x_B[ t_{O\text{refl}} ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{start}} ]\right) - \text{Cosh}[ \frac{k}{c} \tau_{A\text{sign}} ] + 1$.

Solving for $x_B[ t_{O\text{refl}} ]$ (along with $\tau_{A\text{sign}}$) results in

$x_B[ t_{O\text{refl}} ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{start}} ] = \frac{c^2}{k} \left( \sqrt{\left(\frac{k}{c} t_{O\text{refl}}\right)^2 + e^{(\frac{k}{c} T)} } - 1\right)$, i.e.

$x_B[ t_{O\text{refl}} ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{start}} ] = \frac{c^2}{k} \left( \sqrt{\left(\frac{k}{c} t_{O\text{refl}}\right)^2 + e^{(2 \frac{k}{c^2} L)} } - 1\right)$.

This corresponds to hyperbolic motion of $B$ with proper acceleration $k \, e^{(\frac{-k}{c^2} L)}$.

However, this solution doesn't hold for arbitrarily small/early $t_{O\text{refl}}$, but only for its values corresponding to $\tau_{A\text{sign}} \ge 0$, i.e. for ping signals which $A$ had stated at or after having started to accelerate. This applies for

$t_{O\text{refl}} \ge \frac{1}{2} \left( e^{(2 \frac{k}{c^2} L)} - 1\right)$.

Determining even earlier motion of $B$ (corresponding to pings stated by $A$ before starting to accelerate and with echoes received by $A$ after the start) may be more complicated ... but at least numerically possible (and sensible). But it doesn't appear in turn that the ping duration of $B$ (from stating the signal to observing the echo from $A$) remains constant and equal to $T$.

Now as the train accelerates, O will observe the train to continually shrink, thanks to length contraction.

Well ...
Using the above equations of hyperbolic motion, of $A$ corresponding to the setup prescription, and of $B$ obtained accordingly as solution for containt ping duration $T_{ABA} := T$, it is possible to express the distance between any pair of members of the inertial frame (with O) whose indications of having been passed by $A$ and by $B$, respectively, were simultaneous:

$x_B[ t_{O\text{refl}} ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{refl}} ] = \frac{c^2}{k} \left( \sqrt{\left(\frac{k}{c} t_{O\text{refl}}\right)^2 + e^{(2 \frac{k}{c^2} L)} } - \sqrt{ \left(\frac{k}{c} t_{O\text{refl}}\right)^2 + 1 } \right)$.

This quantity is always positive, but is monotonously falling as a function of $t_{O\text{refl}}$.

In particular, for $e^{(2 \frac{k}{c^2} L)} - 1 \ll 1$, $e^{(2 \frac{k}{c^2} L)} \lessapprox 1 + 2 \frac{k}{c^2} L$:

$x_B[ t_{O\text{refl}} ] - x_A[ t_{O\text{refl}} ] \approx \frac{\frac{k}{c^2} L}{\sqrt{ \left(\frac{k}{c} t_{O\text{refl}}\right)^2 + \, 1 }} := \frac{k}{c^2} \frac{L}{\gamma[ t_{O\text{refl}} ]}$.

Of course, this relation holds because the train does not itself shrink, but maintains the "given length" $L$ at least as far as the ping duration $T_{ABA}$ remains constant.

-
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 1, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0, "katex": 0, "math-container": 0, "wp-katex-eq": 0, "align": 0, "equation": 0, "x-ck12": 0, "texerror": 0, "math_score": 0.926116406917572, "perplexity": 408.23208402851947}, "config": {"markdown_headings": false, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "plain"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "warc_path": "s3://commoncrawl/crawl-data/CC-MAIN-2016-30/segments/1469257829320.70/warc/CC-MAIN-20160723071029-00243-ip-10-185-27-174.ec2.internal.warc.gz"}