# Observation of pendular butterfly Rydberg molecules

## Abstract

Engineering molecules with a tunable bond length and defined quantum states lies at the heart of quantum chemistry. The unconventional binding mechanism of Rydberg molecules makes them a promising candidate to implement such tunable molecules. A very peculiar type of Rydberg molecules are the so-called butterfly molecules, which are bound by a shape resonance in the electron–perturber scattering. Here we report the observation of these exotic molecules and employ their exceptional properties to engineer their bond length, vibrational state, angular momentum and orientation in a small electric field. Combining the variable bond length with their giant dipole moment of several hundred Debye, we observe counter-intuitive molecules which locate the average electron position beyond the internuclear distance.

## Introduction

Controlling the internal and external quantum states of molecules is the central goal of ultracold chemistry1 and allows for the study of coherent molecular dynamics, collisions2,3,4,5 and tests of fundamental laws of physics6. If the molecules additionally possess a permanent electric dipole moment, the study of dipolar quantum gases and spin systems with long-range interactions7,8 as well as applications in quantum information processing9,10,11 are possible. Rydberg molecules constitute a class of exotic molecules, which are bound by the interaction between the Rydberg electron and a ground state atom. This peculiar interaction represents a novel chemical binding mechanism, that is based on the elastic S- and P-wave scattering between the electron in a Rydberg state and a ground state perturber atom, which is located inside the electron wavefunction.

The scattering is described by a Fermi-type contact interaction with an energy-dependent scattering length12,13,14,15. The bond length of these molecules is connected to the extension of the electron wavefunction and can reach hundreds of nanometres14,16. In the extreme case, the interaction with the ground state atom can substantially displace the electron from the ionic core, giving rise to permanent electric dipole moments in the kilo-Debye range17. This holds even in the case of homonuclear molecules due to the vanishing exchange energy. The extreme properties of Rydberg molecules make them versatile objects for the study of low-energy electron–atom scattering, precision calculation of potential energy curves18, molecular dipole–dipole interaction, Rydberg blockade and anti-blockade effects in molecular samples as well as complex molecular dynamics.

Due to the presence of a shape resonance in the P-wave scattering, a special type of Rydberg molecules with large binding energies and exceptional properties arises. These so-called butterfly molecules were predicted theoretically in 2002 (refs 19, 20) but clear experimental evidence for their existence was missing so far. Here, we report on the photoassociation of butterfly Rydberg molecules and their orientation in a weak electric field. Starting from a Bose–Einstein condensate of rubidium atoms, we fully control the external degrees of freedom and spectroscopically resolve the rotational structure and the emerging pendular states in an external electric field. This not only allows us to extract the bond length, the dipole moment and the angular momentum of the molecule but also to deterministically create molecules with a tunable bond length and orientation. We anticipate direct applications in quantum chemistry, many-body quantum physics and quantum information processing.

## Results

### Butterfly Rydberg molecules

Butterfly Rydberg molecules are dominated by the P-wave scattering between the Rydberg electron and the ground state atom, which maximizes the gradient of the electron wavefunction at the position of the ground state atom (see Methods). As a consequence, all angular momentum states of the Rydberg electron are mixed and the electron density acquires a characteristic density distribution which resembles a butterfly (Fig. 1). The first spectroscopic evidence for the existence of this mechanism has been reported in refs 21, 22. The calculation of the corresponding potential energy curves (PEC) in the Born–Oppenheimer approximation requires the diagonalization of the full Hamiltonian, which in our approach includes the fine structure in the Rydberg atom, the hyperfine interaction in the perturber atom, and all S- and P-wave scattering processes (see Methods). The PECs in the vicinity of the 25p-state are shown in Fig. 2a. The butterfly states detach from the n=23 hydrogenic manifold and cross all lower-lying states down to the 25p-state. The red PECs are relevant for this work and the bound states in the strongly oscillating part of the PEC are the butterfly molecules under investigation. Even for the deepest potential wells the electron wave functions in these PECs possess a 15% admixture of the 25p-state, which we use to excite the butterfly molecules with a single photon transition.

### Photoassociation spectroscopy

The experiment was performed in a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) of 87Rb with a peak particle density of 4 × 1014 cm−3, an atom number of 2 × 105 and a temperature of 100 nK. All spin states of the 5s1/2, F=1 ground state were populated. The photoassociation of the butterfly molecules was achieved using a single photon transition to the energetic vicinity of the adiabatic free two-particle state 25p1/25s1/2, F=1, which serves as reference point for our spectroscopy throughout this work. Since the created butterfly molecules can decay into ions by photoionization and associative ionization23, the produced ions are used as a probe for the creation of the molecule.

The experimental sequence consists of 500 ms continuous excitation and ion detection. By detuning the excitation laser up to −60 GHz in steps of 2 MHz we obtain the spectrum shown to the right of Fig. 2b. As the laser detuning is gradually increased, we start to probe the bound states in the butterfly potential. We observe a plenitude of molecular states up to an energy of −50 GHz. This is in accordance with the calculated PECs. Moreover, the density of molecular states drops at detunings below −40 GHz, which marks the transition to a spectral region, where only the lowest bound states in each potential well are populated. The spectroscopic results directly prove the existence of butterfly molecules.

### Pendular states

We now focus on the ground state molecules in each potential well and demonstrate, how butterfly molecules with selected bond length and high degree of orientation can be created. Due to the symmetry breaking caused by the localized valence electron of the perturber, butterfly molecules, along with the related class of so-called trilobite molecules, are the only known homonuclear molecules with a large permanent electric dipole moment14,15,17,24. The interaction of the dipole moment μ with an external electric field F significantly changes the rotational structure of the molecule. In the simplest approximate description of a dipolar rigid rotor that neglects the coupling of the nuclear motion to the electronic and nuclear spin degrees of freedom, the eigenstates of energy E need to fulfil (see Methods)

In equation (1), the zero of the energy axis is chosen to coincide with the rotationless vibrational energy level being studied. For vanishing electric field, the molecule behaves as a rigid rotor of length R0 and reduced mass mr=mRb/2 using the rotational quantum number N, its projection on the molecular axis MN and the rotational constant Be=2/2I, where I=mrR02 represents the moment of inertia of the rigid rotor. When, on the other hand, the interaction with the electric field dominates the rotational constant , the molecule enters so-called pendular states25,26, which are characterized by the quantum number ν and differ in the degree of orientation of the molecule with respect to the field axis (Fig. 3a). In this regime only the angular momentum projection MN remains a good quantum number, while the rotational quantum numbers N are strongly mixed.

In Fig. 3b, we show the electric field-dependent spectra of the butterfly state at −47.9 GHz along with the fitted theory of equation (1). Due to the huge dipole moments of the butterfly molecules, fields of 1 V cm−1 are sufficient to put the system deep in the pendular regime. Varying the electric field, we can directly observe the crossover from rotational states to pendular states. At fields of 4 V cm−1, the degree of orientation ω exceeds previous record values26 by a factor of two. Since we photoassociate the butterfly molecules in a Bose–Einstein condensate, which has no angular momentum in the centre of mass motion, only states with |MN|=0 and |MN|=1 can be observed (see Methods). This leads to a very clean spectrum of pendular states, which, in contrast to previous studies16,17,21,22,24, allows to determine the dipole moment μ with an estimated precision of 10 Debye and the bond length R0 with an estimated precision of 5 a0.

Applying this method to eight of the lowest spectroscopic lines in the butterfly spectrum, we can extract the respective dipole moments and bond lengths (Fig. 2c). This additional information enables an improved interpretation of the butterfly spectrum and comparison with theory. This is demonstrated in Fig. 2b, where the orange points mark the measured bond lengths and binding energies for the eight studied lines. The energetic deviation of the measured points from the predicted bound states is only few per cent of the binding energy and is most likely explained by inaccurate P-wave scattering phase shifts assumed in the model. It is remarkable how well the measured bond lengths agree with the wells of the model potential. In fact, the positions of the wells are mainly determined by the strong gradient at the radial nodes of the p-state electronic wavefunction and thus the bond length of the butterfly molecules is an indirect measure for the position of the 25p radial nodes. A comparison of the measured bond lengths with the nodes of the calculated 25p1/2 wavefunction is shown in the top panel of Fig. 2b.

### Properties

Butterfly molecules also exhibit counter-intuitive properties. In a semiclassical picture of molecules with one valence electron, the average position of the electron is always located between the two nuclei. The maximum possible dipole moment is thus limited by the bond length, as realized, for example, in an ionic bond. The strong interference of the electron caused by the scattering with the ground state atom (Fig. 1) permits the butterfly molecules to exceed this limit and locate the electron’s average position beyond the perturber (Fig. 2d). This effect is seen experimentally for the deepest bound butterfly molecules. The state at −50.3 GHz possesses a dipole moment of 380 Debye, which is 30% larger than that of two opposite charges separated by the measured bond length of 116 a0. This phenomenon is even stronger in the theoretical model, which reveals a dipole moment of 442 Debye for the studied state. Throughout all investigated butterfly states the measured dipole moments are systematically lower than the calculated values but do not deviate by >35%.

Due to the deep potential wells (Fig. 2b), inward tunnelling and subsequent decay should not limit the lifetime of the studied butterfly molecules. In a separate experiment using short excitation pulses (see Methods) we were able to determine the lifetimes of the strongest observed butterfly molecules. In the high-density environment of a BEC we find a lifetime of 5 μs which is mainly limited by inelastic collisions with additional ground state atoms. Extrapolating to zero ground state density to mitigate the effect of collisions we find a lifetime on the order of 20 μs, which is compatible with the lifetime of the 25p Rydberg state.

## Discussion

The long lifetime along with the negligible motion of the ground state atoms in the BEC enables narrow photoassociation lines and thus a clean optical spectroscopy. This allows for the deterministic creation of vibrational ground state molecules with a selected bond length and dipole moment. In a weak electric field we can furthermore restrict the rotation of the molecule and precisely set the orientation of the molecule with respect to the field axis. This high degree of control over molecules with giant dipole moments even in a sample with only one atomic species opens many perspectives for future applications. The high precision of the molecular spectroscopy can serve as a benchmark for quantum chemical calculations of molecular states. Rydberg molecules are promising candidates to implement dipolar interactions in many-body quantum systems. The comparable energy scale of the rotational structure and the dipole–dipole interaction is unique in the world of polar molecules and will complement studies using heteronuclear alkali dimers in the rovibrational ground state7. Starting from pre-associated weakly bound ground state molecules in a three-dimensional optical lattice, spin physics with pendular states are feasible7. Dressing weakly bound molecules with a Rydberg molecule might even allow to study coherent tunnelling dynamics with long-range interactions. It will be interesting in the future to extend the concepts of the Rydberg blockade and anti-blockade to interacting Rydberg molecules. Butterfly molecules might also be a good starting point to prepare heavy Rydberg systems27. Ultimately pendular states of dipolar molecules could also be a building block to scalable quantum information processing9,11.

## Methods

### Calculation of the butterfly PECs

Rich spectral features, such as average line shifts and collisional broadening, arise when a Rydberg atom is excited in a high-density gas. These effects have been understood since Fermi’s idea of a quasi-free electron12 could successfully explain the early experiments by Amaldi and Segrè28. Extending Fermi’s work, Omont later generalized the zero-range S-wave potential to higher partial waves13. The contribution of the P-wave becomes particularly important in alkali atoms, as those show a low-energy shape resonance in the 3Po scattering channel. To model the high-resolution spectroscopy of rovibrational diatomic Rydberg levels, we not only include the singlet electron–Rb S-wave and P-wave scattering information but also the spin–orbit splitting of the Rydberg state and the ground state 87Rb(5s1/2) hyperfine structure. Thus, the Hamiltonian for the Rydberg–perturber interaction in atomic units reads as29

where the position of the Rydberg electron is denoted as r, whereas the position of the perturber from the Rydberg core is expressed as R. represents the unperturbed Rydberg states involved in the calculations, accounting for the appropriate quantum defects30. asS(kR) and asT(kR) denote the singlet and triplet S-wave e–Rb(5S) scattering lengths, and analogously apS(kR) and apT(kR) represent the singlet and triplet P-wave e–Rb(5S) scattering lengths, respectively15. The momentum of the Rydberg electron evaluated at the perturber position is , where n* stands for the effective quantum number of the level of interest. In equation (2), the triplet and singlet components of the e–Rb(5S) scattering lengths are associated with the projectors and , respectively. The last term in equation (2) represents the hyperfine structure of the perturbing atom 87Rb 5s1/2 with A=3.417 GHz. The present Hamiltonian is diagonalized in a truncated basis of atomic levels, along with the electron and nuclear spin degrees of freedom for the perturbing ground state atom, that is, , where L1, J1 and mJ1 are associated with the Rydberg electron as in refs 29, 31, whereas |ms2mI2〉 stands for the hyperfine levels in the perturbing atom.

### Dipolar rigid rotor model

The simplest approximate description for the observed rotational structure of the Rydberg molecules includes only the squared rotational angular momentum operator , and thus ignores coupling to the electronic and nuclear spin degrees of freedom. Due to the particular nature of the butterfly potentials also the mixing of vibrational states can be neglected. The otherwise vanishing overlap of the nuclear wavefunction allows only for states located in the same well to be mixed. Since the spacing of the vibrational levels inside the wells is higher than 3.5 GHz while the splitting of the rotational states in the small applied fields is only 300 MHz we do not expect significant mixing of the vibrational states in the field. However, for higher electric field strength this mixing has to be taken into account.

### Experimental setup

Starting from a three-dimensional magneto-optical trap, a Bose–Einstein condensate of 87Rb is prepared by forced evaporation in a crossed YAG dipole trap. We reach a BEC of 2 × 105 rubidium-87 atoms at final trapping frequencies of 2π × 150 Hz in the radial and 2π × 80 Hz in the axial direction. The photoassociation of the butterfly molecules is done with a frequency doubled, continuous wave dye laser at a wavelength of 297 nm and a total power of 20 mW, focused to a beam waist of 40 μm. The excitation pulse has a duration of 500 ms, during which the generated ions are detected with a discrete dynode electron multiplier. A small electric field of 30 mV cm−1 at the position of the BEC is needed to guide the ions to the detector and is thus always present, if not higher fields are applied. The total detection efficiency for a single created ion is 44%. For the measurements presented here the linear polarization of the excitation light was orthogonal to the electric field axis, yielding strong transitions to the MN=1 states (see also Methods). The full experimental spectrum (Fig. 2b) consists of multiple individual measurements spanning up to 2 GHz, which is the maximum continuous detuning range of the employed transfer cavity lock. To combine the individual measurements we use the absolute frequency reference of a Fizeau-interferometer-based wavemeter. The uncertainty in the observed binding energies are thus mainly limited by the wavemeter’s resolution of 10 MHz.

The lifetime of the butterfly molecules was measured in a time of flight experiment, as described in ref. 23. After a short laser pulse of 1 μs the produced atomic and molecular ions are recorded. We extract the lifetime from the exponential decay of the molecular ion signal.

### Polarization dependence

Since we photoassociate butterfly molecules from a BEC that has no angular momentum in the centre of mass motion, only rotational states with MN=0 and MN=±1, corresponding to π and σ± transitions, respectively, can be excited. A comparison of the pendular state spectroscopy for different orientation of the linear laser polarization is presented in Fig. 4. If the laser polarization is parallel to the electric field (blue) we mainly drive a π transition and the |MN|=0 lines dominate the spectrum. If, on the other hand, the laser polarization is orthogonal to the electric field axis (red), we drive both σ+ and σ transitions and thus mainly couple to the |MN|=1 states.

Since the BEC provides an initial state with N=0, MN=0 and the usual angular momentum selection rules ΔN=0,±1 (but N=0→N'=0 forbidden) need to be fulfilled in the photoassociation process, we can only couple to |N=1, MN=0,±1〉 states. The coupling strength is therefore proportional to the admixture of the N=1 state (Fig. 4).

### Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

How to cite this article: Niederprüm, T. et al. Observation of pendular butterfly Rydberg molecules. Nat. Commun. 7:12820 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12820 (2016).

## References

1. 1

Carr, L. D., DeMille, D., Krems, R. V. & Ye, J. Cold and ultracold molecules: science, technology and applications. New J. Phys. 11, 055049 (2009).

2. 2

Quéméner, G. & Julienne, P. S. Ultracold molecules under control!. Chem. Rev. 112, 4949 (2012).

3. 3

Pérez-Ríos, J., Leperes, M., Vexiau, R., Bouloufa-Maafa, N. & Dulieu, O. Progress toward ultracold chemistry: ultracold atomic and photonic collisions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 488, 012031 (2014).

4. 4

Kendrick, B. K., Hazra, J. & Balakrishnan, N. The geometric phase controls ultracold chemistry. Nat. Commun. 6, 7918 (2015).

5. 5

Hauser, D. et al. Rotational state-changing cold collisions of hydroxyl ions with helium. Nat. Phys. 11, 467–470 (2015).

6. 6

Baron, J. et al. Order of magnitude smaller limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron. Science 343, 269–272 (2014).

7. 7

Baranov, M. A., Dalmonte, M., Pupillo, G. & Zoller, P. Condensed matter theory of dipolar quantum gases. Chem. Rev. 112, 5012 (2012).

8. 8

Kadau, H. et al. Observing the Rosensweig instability of a quantum ferrofluid. Nature 530, 194–197 (2016).

9. 9

DeMille, D. Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002).

10. 10

Rabl, P. et al. Hybrid quantum processors: molecular ensembles as quantum memory for solid state circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 033003 (2006).

11. 11

Wei, Q., Kais, S., Friedrich, B. & Herschbach, D. Entanglement of polar molecules in pendular states. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 124107 (2011).

12. 12

Fermi, E. Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali. Nuovo Cimento 11, 157 (1934).

13. 13

Omont, A. On the theory of collisions of atoms in Rydberg states with neutral particles. J. Physique 38, 1343 (1977).

14. 14

Greene, C. H., Dickinson, A. S. & Sadeghpour, H. R. Creation of polar and nonpolar ultra-long-range Rydberg molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2458 (2000).

15. 15

Khuskivadze, A. A., Chibisov, M. I. & Fabrikant, I. I. Adiabatic energy levels and electric dipole moments of Rydberg states of Rb2 and Cs2 dimers. Phys. Rev. A 66, 042709 (2002).

16. 16

Bendkowsky, V. et al. Observation of ultralong-range Rydberg molecules. Nature 458, 1005–1008 (2009).

17. 17

Booth, D., Rittenhouse, S. T., Yang, J., Sadeghpour, H. R. & Shaffer, J. P. Production of trilobite Rydberg molecule dimers with kilo-debye permanent electric dipole moments. Science 348, 99–102 (2015).

18. 18

Schlagmüller, M. et al. Probing and electronc scattering resonance using Rydberg molecules within a dense and ultracold gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 053001 (2016).

19. 19

Chibisov, M. I., Khuskivadze, A. A. & Fabrikant, I. I. Energies and dipole moments of long-range molecular rydberg states. J. Phys. B 35, L193 (2002).

20. 20

Hamilton, E. L., Greene, C. H. & Sadeghpour, H. R. Shape-resonance-induced long-range molecular Rydberg states. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, L199 (2002).

21. 21

Bellos, M. A. et al. Excitation of weakly bound molecules to trilobitelike Rydberg states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 053001 (2013).

22. 22

Greene, C. H., Hamilton, E. L., Crowell, H., Vadla, C. & Niemax, K. Experimental verification of minima in excited long-range Rydberg states of Rb2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 233002 (2006).

23. 23

Niederprüm, T., Thomas, O., Manthey, T., Weber, T. M. & Ott, H. Giant cross section for molecular ion formation in ultracold Rydberg gases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 013003 (2015).

24. 24

Li, W. et al. A homonuclear molecule with a permanent electric dipole moment. Science 334, 1110–1114 (2011).

25. 25

Rost, J. M., Griffin, J. C., Friedrich, B. & Herschbach, D. R. Pendular states and spectra of oriented linear molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1299 (1992).

26. 26

Block, P. A., Bohac, E. J. & Miller, R. E. Spectroscopy of pendular states: the use of molecular complexes in achieving orientation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1303 (1992).

27. 27

Reinhold, E. & Ubachs, W. Heavy Rydberg states. Mol. Phys. 103, 1329 (2005).

28. 28

Amaldi, E. & Segrè, E. Effect of pressure on high terms of alkaline spectra. Nature 133, 141 (1934).

29. 29

Anderson, D. A., Miller, S. A. & Raithel, G. Angular-momentum couplings in long-range Rb2 Rydberg molecules. Phys. Rev. A 90, 062518 (2014).

30. 30

Lorenzen, C. J. & Niemax, K. Quantum defects of the n1/2,3/2P levels in 39K I and 85Rb I. Phys. Scr. 27, 300 (1983).

31. 31

Sadeghpour, H. R. & Rittenhouse, S. T. How do ultralong-range homonuclear Rydberg molecules get their permanent dipole moments? Mol. Phys. 111, 1902 (2013).

## Acknowledgements

We thank I. Fabrikant for providing calculated data on the non-relativistic scattering phase shifts and G. Raithel for helpful discussions. We acknowledge financial support by the DFG within the SFB/TR 49. O.T. is supported by the MAINZ graduate school. C.G. and J.P.-R. are supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation grant number PHY-1306905.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

T.N., O.T., T.E. and C.L. performed the experiment. H.O. supervised the experiment. T.N. analysed the data and prepared the manuscript. T.N., O.T., J.P.-R., C.G. and H.O. developed the theoretical model. All authors contributed to the data interpretation and manuscript preparation.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herwig Ott.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Niederprüm, T., Thomas, O., Eichert, T. et al. Observation of pendular butterfly Rydberg molecules. Nat Commun 7, 12820 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12820

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Emergence and control of complex behaviors in driven systems of interacting qubits with dissipation

• A. V. Andreev
• , A. G. Balanov
• , T. M. Fromhold
• , M. T. Greenaway
• , A. E. Hramov
• , W. Li
• , V. V. Makarov
•  & A. M. Zagoskin

npj Quantum Information (2021)

• ### Heteronuclear Rydberg molecules

• J. D. Whalen
• , S. K. Kanungo
• , Y. Lu
• , S. Yoshida
• , J. Burgdörfer
• , F. B. Dunning
•  & T. C. Killian

Physical Review A (2020)

• ### Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules

• Christian Fey
• , Frederic Hummel
•  & Peter Schmelcher

Molecular Physics (2020)

• ### Triatomic butterfly molecules

• Matthew T Eiles
• , Christian Fey
• , Frederic Hummel
•  & Peter Schmelcher

Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics (2020)

• ### Dressed Ion-Pair States of an Ultralong-Range Rydberg Molecule

• P. Giannakeas
• , Matthew T. Eiles
• , F. Robicheaux
•  & Jan M. Rost

Physical Review Letters (2020)
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": false, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 0, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0, "katex": 0, "math-container": 0, "wp-katex-eq": 0, "align": 0, "equation": 0, "x-ck12": 0, "texerror": 0, "math_score": 0.8838778138160706, "perplexity": 2131.132677281239}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 20, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "plain"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "warc_path": "s3://commoncrawl/crawl-data/CC-MAIN-2021-04/segments/1610703519923.26/warc/CC-MAIN-20210120054203-20210120084203-00374.warc.gz"}