As popular tools for spreading spam and malware, Sybils (or fake accounts) pose a serious threat to online communities such as Online Social Networks (OSNs). Today, sophisticated attackers are creating realistic Sybils that effectively befriend legitimate users, rendering most automated Sybil detection techniques ineffective. In this paper, we explore the feasibility of a crowdsourced Sybil detection system for OSNs. We conduct a large user study on the ability of humans to detect today's Sybil accounts, using a large corpus of ground-truth Sybil accounts from the Facebook and Renren networks. We analyze detection accuracy by both "experts" and "turkers" under a variety of conditions, and find that while turkers vary significantly in their effectiveness, experts consistently produce near-optimal results. We use these results to drive the design of a multi-tier crowdsourcing Sybil detection system. Using our user study data, we show that this system is scalable, and can be highly effective either as a standalone system or as a complementary technique to current tools.
@cite_19: Human linguistic annotation is crucial for many natural language processing tasks but can be expensive and time-consuming. We explore the use of Amazon's Mechanical Turk system, a significantly cheaper and faster method for collecting annotations from a broad base of paid non-expert contributors over the Web. We investigate five tasks: affect recognition, word similarity, recognizing textual entailment, event temporal ordering, and word sense disambiguation. For all five, we show high agreement between Mechanical Turk non-expert annotations and existing gold standard labels provided by expert labelers. For the task of affect recognition, we also show that using non-expert labels for training machine learning algorithms can be as effective as using gold standard annotations from experts. We propose a technique for bias correction that significantly improves annotation quality on two tasks. We conclude that many large labeling tasks can be effectively designed and carried out in this method at a fraction of the usual expense.
@cite_29: 
@cite_26: Quality assurance remains a key topic in human computation research field. Prior work indicates independent agreement is effective for low difficulty tasks, but has limitations. This paper addresses this problem by proposing a tournament selection based quality control process. The experimental results from this paper show that the human are better at identifying the correct answers than producing them themselves.
@cite_21: Crowdsourcing is an effective tool for scalable data annotation in both research and enterprise contexts. Due to crowdsourcing's open participation model, quality assurance is critical to the success of any project. Present methods rely on EM-style post-processing or manual annotation of large gold standard sets. In this paper we present an automated quality assurance process that is inexpensive and scalable. Our novel process relies on programmatic gold creation to provide targeted training feedback to workers and to prevent common scamming scenarios. We find that it decreases the amount of manual work required to manage crowdsourced labor while improving the overall quality of the results.
Many studies address the problem of how to maximize accuracy from inherently unreliable turkers. The most common approach is to use majority voting @cite_19 @cite_29 , although this scheme is vulnerable to collusion attacks by malicious turkers @cite_26 . Another approach is to pre-screen turkers with a questionnaire to filter out less reliable workers @cite_21 . Finally, @cite_26 proposes using a tournament algorithm to determine the correct answer for difficult tasks.