Deep Neural Networks have achieved huge success at a wide spectrum of applications from language modeling, computer vision to speech recognition. However, nowadays, good performance alone is not enough to satisfy the needs of practical deployment where interpretability is demanded for cases involving ethics and mission critical applications. The complex models of Deep Neural Networks make it hard to understand and reason the predictions, which hinders its further progress. To tackle this problem, we apply the Knowledge Distillation technique to distill Deep Neural Networks into decision trees in order to attain good performance and interpretability simultaneously. We formulate the problem at hand as a multi-output regression problem and the experiments demonstrate that the student model achieves significantly better accuracy performance (about 1 to 5 ) than vanilla decision trees at the same level of tree depth. The experiments are implemented on the TensorFlow platform to make it scalable to big datasets. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to distill Deep Neural Networks into vanilla decision trees on multi-class datasets.
@cite_30: Interpreting black box classifiers, such as deep networks, allows an analyst to validate a classifier before it is deployed in a high-stakes setting. A natural idea is to visualize the deep network's representations, so as to "see what the network sees". In this paper, we demonstrate that standard dimension reduction methods in this setting can yield uninformative or even misleading visualizations. Instead, we present DarkSight, which visually summarizes the predictions of a classifier in a way inspired by notion of dark knowledge. DarkSight embeds the data points into a low-dimensional space such that it is easy to compress the deep classifier into a simpler one, essentially combining model compression and dimension reduction. We compare DarkSight against t-SNE both qualitatively and quantitatively, demonstrating that DarkSight visualizations are more informative. Our method additionally yields a new confidence measure based on dark knowledge by quantifying how unusual a given vector of predictions is.
@cite_8: We present a new technique called “t-SNE” that visualizes high-dimensional data by giving each datapoint a location in a two or three-dimensional map. The technique is a variation of Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (Hinton and Roweis, 2002) that is much easier to optimize, and produces significantly better visualizations by reducing the tendency to crowd points together in the center of the map. t-SNE is better than existing techniques at creating a single map that reveals structure at many different scales. This is particularly important for high-dimensional data that lie on several different, but related, low-dimensional manifolds, such as images of objects from multiple classes seen from multiple viewpoints. For visualizing the structure of very large datasets, we show how t-SNE can use random walks on neighborhood graphs to allow the implicit structure of all of the data to influence the way in which a subset of the data is displayed. We illustrate the performance of t-SNE on a wide variety of datasets and compare it with many other non-parametric visualization techniques, including Sammon mapping, Isomap, and Locally Linear Embedding. The visualizations produced by t-SNE are significantly better than those produced by the other techniques on almost all of the datasets.
A most recent work @cite_30 combines knowledge distillation and dimension reduction to visualize the results of deep classifiers. They pointed out that the method: t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) @cite_8 commonly used for visualizing the activations of hidden layers was problematic. They propose to visualize the data points that are assigned similar probability vectors to give practitioners a sense of how the decisions are made on test cases. They train a simpler and more interpretable classifier using the soft targets generated by a deep classifier. The student model they applied is Naive Bayes.