Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved a superior performance by taking advantages of the complex network architectures and huge numbers of parameters, which however become uninterpretable and challenge their full potential to practical applications. Towards better understand the rationale behind the network decisions, we propose a novel architecture decoupling method, which dynamically discovers the hierarchical path consisting of activated filters for each input image. In particular, architecture controlling module is introduced in each layer to encode the network architecture and identify the activated filters corresponding to the specific input. Then, mutual information between architecture encoding and the attribute of input image is maximized to decouple the network architecture, and subsequently disentangles the filters by limiting the outputs of filter during training. Extensive experiments show that several merits have been achieved based on the proposed architecture decoupling, i.e., interpretation, acceleration and adversarial attacking.
@cite_30: Understanding why a model makes a certain prediction can be as crucial as the prediction's accuracy in many applications. However, the highest accuracy for large modern datasets is often achieved by complex models that even experts struggle to interpret, such as ensemble or deep learning models, creating a tension between accuracy and interpretability. In response, various methods have recently been proposed to help users interpret the predictions of complex models, but it is often unclear how these methods are related and when one method is preferable over another. To address this problem, we present a unified framework for interpreting predictions, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). SHAP assigns each feature an importance value for a particular prediction. Its novel components include: (1) the identification of a new class of additive feature importance measures, and (2) theoretical results showing there is a unique solution in this class with a set of desirable properties. The new class unifies six existing methods, notable because several recent methods in the class lack the proposed desirable properties. Based on insights from this unification, we present new methods that show improved computational performance and or better consistency with human intuition than previous approaches.
@cite_35: Neural network models have a reputation for being black boxes. We propose a new method to better understand the roles and dynamics of the intermediate layers. This has direct consequences on the design of such models and it enables the expert to be able to justify certain heuristics (such as adding auxiliary losses in middle layers). Our method uses linear classifiers, referred to as probes'', where a probe can only use the hidden units of a given intermediate layer as discriminating features. Moreover, these probes cannot affect the training phase of a model, and they are generally added after training. They allow the user to visualize the state of the model at multiple steps of training. We demonstrate how this can be used to develop a better intuition about models and to diagnose potential problems.
@cite_41: This paper presents a method to learn a decision tree to quantitatively explain the logic of each prediction of a pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Our method boosts the following two aspects of network interpretability. 1) In the CNN, each filter in a high conv-layer must represent a specific object part, instead of describing mixed patterns without clear meanings. 2) People can explain each specific prediction made by the CNN at the semantic level using a decision tree, i.e., which filters (or object parts) are used for prediction and how much they contribute in the prediction. To conduct such a quantitative explanation of a CNN, our method learns explicit representations of object parts in high conv-layers of the CNN and mines potential decision modes memorized in fully-connected layers. The decision tree organizes these potential decision modes in a coarse-to-fine manner. Experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.
@cite_48: Interpretability of a deep neural network aims to explain the rationale behind its decisions and enable the users to understand the intelligent agents, which has become an important issue due to its importance in practical applications. To address this issue, we develop a Distillation Guided Routing method, which is a flexible framework to interpret a deep neural network by identifying critical data routing paths and analyzing the functional processing behavior of the corresponding layers. Specifically, we propose to discover the critical nodes on the data routing paths during network inferring prediction for individual input samples by learning associated control gates for each layer's output channel. The routing paths can, therefore, be represented based on the responses of concatenated control gates from all the layers, which reflect the network's semantic selectivity regarding to the input patterns and more detailed functional process across different layer levels. Based on the discoveries, we propose an adversarial sample detection algorithm by learning a classifier to discriminate whether the critical data routing paths are from real or adversarial samples. Experiments demonstrate that our algorithm can effectively achieve high defense rate with minor training overhead.
@cite_54: 
@cite_29: How can we explain the predictions of a black-box model? In this paper, we use influence functions — a classic technique from robust statistics — to trace a model's prediction through the learning algorithm and back to its training data, thereby identifying training points most responsible for a given prediction. To scale up influence functions to modern machine learning settings, we develop a simple, efficient implementation that requires only oracle access to gradients and Hessian-vector products. We show that even on non-convex and non-differentiable models where the theory breaks down, approximations to influence functions can still provide valuable information. On linear models and convolutional neural networks, we demonstrate that influence functions are useful for multiple purposes: understanding model behavior, debugging models, detecting dataset errors, and even creating visually-indistinguishable training-set attacks.
@cite_44: 
@cite_34: 
@cite_13: 
Another way to interpret network is @cite_29 @cite_13 @cite_34 @cite_44 by analyzing how the network works. The influence functions @cite_29 are proposed to trace the model prediction. Lakkaraju @cite_54 explored the knowledge blind spots of neural networks in a weakly-supervised manner. Recently, a unified framework has been proposed to interpret network prediction @cite_30 . To better understand the classification process, a decision tree has been used in @cite_41 . Moreover, Alain @cite_35 proposed to add a linear classifier to each layer and then explore the information of the features. However, it only considers the difference between features in different layers, while the intra-layer difference is not involved in consideration. Wang @cite_48 interpreted the network by analyzing the routing path of different inputs. It, however, does not train the network to improve the network interpretability, such that the network still has many uninterpretable parameters. Different from all these methods, we interpret the working principle of the network by disentangling the network architecture, upon which we further decouple each filter in the intra-layer to explore the interpretable semantic concepts across nodes on the calculation path.