Of late, weakly supervised object detection is with great importance in object recognition. Based on deep learning, weakly supervised detectors have achieved many promising results. However, compared with fully supervised detection, it is more challenging to train deep network based detectors in a weakly supervised manner. Here we formulate weakly supervised detection as a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) problem, where instance classifiers (object detectors) are put into the network as hidden nodes. We propose a novel online instance classifier refinement algorithm to integrate MIL and the instance classifier refinement procedure into a single deep network, and train the network end-to-end with only image-level supervision, i.e., without object location information. More precisely, instance labels inferred from weak supervision are propagated to their spatially overlapped instances to refine instance classifier online. The iterative instance classifier refinement procedure is implemented using multiple streams in deep network, where each stream supervises its latter stream. Weakly supervised object detection experiments are carried out on the challenging PASCAL VOC 2007 and 2012 benchmarks. We obtain 47 mAP on VOC 2007 that significantly outperforms the previous state-of-the-art.
@cite_14: We present a new multiple-instance (MI) learning technique (EM-DD) that combines EM with the diverse density (DD) algorithm. EM-DD is a general-purpose MI algorithm that can be applied with boolean or real-value labels and makes real-value predictions. On the boolean Musk benchmarks, the EM-DD algorithm without any tuning significantly outperforms all previous algorithms. EM-DD is relatively insensitive to the number of relevant attributes in the data set and scales up well to large bag sizes. Furthermore, EM-DD provides a new framework for MI learning, in which the MI problem is converted to a single-instance setting by using EM to estimate the instance responsible for the label of the bag.
@cite_32: 
@cite_13: This paper presents two new formulations of multiple-instance learning as a maximum margin problem. The proposed extensions of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning approach lead to mixed integer quadratic programs that can be solved heuristic ally. Our generalization of SVMs makes a state-of-the-art classification technique, including non-linear classification via kernels, available to an area that up to now has been largely dominated by special purpose methods. We present experimental results on a pharmaceutical data set and on applications in automated image indexing and document categorization.
@cite_33: The multiple instance problem arises in tasks where the training examples are ambiguous: a single example object may have many alternative feature vectors (instances) that describe it, and yet only one of those feature vectors may be responsible for the observed classification of the object. This paper describes and compares three kinds of algorithms that learn axis-parallel rectangles to solve the multiple instance problem. Algorithms that ignore the multiple instance problem perform very poorly. An algorithm that directly confronts the multiple instance problem (by attempting to identify which feature vectors are responsible for the observed classifications) performs best, giving 89 correct predictions on a musk odor prediction task. The paper also illustrates the use of artificial data to debug and compare these algorithms.
MIL is a classical weakly supervised learning problem and was first proposed in @cite_33 for drug activity prediction. After that, many solutions have been proposed for MIL @cite_13 @cite_32 @cite_14 . In MIL, a set of bags are given, and each bag is associated with a collection of instances. MIL has two constraints: 1) If a bag is positive, at least one instance in the bag is positive; 2) If a bag is negative, all instances in the bag are negative. It is natural to treat WSOD as a MIL problem. Then the problem turns into finding an instance classifier only given bag labels. Our method also follows the MIL line, and the classifier refinement is inspired by the classifier updating procedure in mi-SVM @cite_13 to some extent. The differences are that, in mi-SVM, it uses an alternative strategy to relabel instances and retrain a classifier, while we adopt an online refinement algorithm; the mi-SVM relabel instances according to the instance score predicted by the classifier, while we select instances according to the spatial relation.