Do users from Carnegie Mellon University form social communities on Facebook? Do signal processing researchers tightly collaborate with each other? Do Chinese restaurants in Manhattan cluster together? These seemingly different problems share a common structure: an attribute that may be localized on a graph. In other words, nodes activated by an attribute form a subgraph that can be easily separated from other nodes. In this paper, we thus focus on the task of detecting localized attributes on a graph. We are particularly interested in categorical attributes such as attributes in online social networks, ratings in recommender systems, and viruses in cyber-physical systems because they are widely used in numerous data mining applications. To solve the task, we formulate a statistical hypothesis testing problem to decide whether a given attribute is localized or not. We propose two statistics: Graph wavelet statistic and graph scan statistic, both of which are provably effective in detecting localized attributes. We validate the robustness of the proposed statistics on both simulated data and two real-world applications: High air-pollution detection and keyword ranking in a coauthorship network collected from IEEE Xplore. Experimental results show that the proposed graph wavelet statistic and graph scan statistic are effective and efficient.
@cite_64: Many methods have been proposed for community detection in networks, but most of them do not take into account additional information on the nodes that is often available in practice. In this paper, we propose a new joint community detection criterion that uses both the network edge information and the node features to detect community structures. One advantage our method has over existing joint detection approaches is the flexibility of learning the impact of different features which may differ across communities. Another advantage is the flexibility of choosing the amount of influence the feature information has on communities. The method is asymptotically consistent under the block model with additional assumptions on the feature distributions, and performs well on simulated and real networks.
@cite_78: 
@cite_32: Network theory has become pervasive in all sectors of biology, from biochemical signalling to human societies, but identification of relevant functional communities has been impaired by many nodes belonging to several overlapping groups at once, and by hierarchical structures. These authors offer a radically different viewpoint, focusing on links rather than nodes, which allows them to demonstrate that overlapping communities and network hierarchies are two faces of the same issue.
@cite_79: Network communities represent basic structures for understanding the organization of real-world networks. A community (also referred to as a module or a cluster) is typically thought of as a group of nodes with more connections amongst its members than between its members and the remainder of the network. Communities in networks also overlap as nodes belong to multiple clusters at once. Due to the difficulties in evaluating the detected communities and the lack of scalable algorithms, the task of overlapping community detection in large networks largely remains an open problem. In this paper we present BIGCLAM (Cluster Affiliation Model for Big Networks), an overlapping community detection method that scales to large networks of millions of nodes and edges. We build on a novel observation that overlaps between communities are densely connected. This is in sharp contrast with present community detection methods which implicitly assume that overlaps between communities are sparsely connected and thus cannot properly extract overlapping communities in networks. In this paper, we develop a model-based community detection algorithm that can detect densely overlapping, hierarchically nested as well as non-overlapping communities in massive networks. We evaluate our algorithm on 6 large social, collaboration and information networks with ground-truth community information. Experiments show state of the art performance both in terms of the quality of detected communities as well as in speed and scalability of our algorithm.
@cite_59: 
@cite_50: A number of recent studies have focused on the statistical properties of networked systems such as social networks and the Worldwide Web. Researchers have concentrated particularly on a few properties that seem to be common to many networks: the small-world property, power-law degree distributions, and network transitivity. In this article, we highlight another property that is found in many networks, the property of community structure, in which network nodes are joined together in tightly knit groups, between which there are only looser connections. We propose a method for detecting such communities, built around the idea of using centrality indices to find community boundaries. We test our method on computer-generated and real-world graphs whose community structure is already known and find that the method detects this known structure with high sensitivity and reliability. We also apply the method to two networks whose community structure is not well known—a collaboration network and a food web—and find that it detects significant and informative community divisions in both cases.
@cite_10: Community detection algorithms are fundamental tools that allow us to uncover organizational principles in networks. When detecting communities, there are two possible sources of information one can use: the network structure, and the features and attributes of nodes. Even though communities form around nodes that have common edges and common attributes, typically, algorithms have only focused on one of these two data modalities: community detection algorithms traditionally focus only on the network structure, while clustering algorithms mostly consider only node attributes. In this paper, we develop Communities from Edge Structure and Node Attributes (CESNA), an accurate and scalable algorithm for detecting overlapping communities in networks with node attributes. CESNA statistically models the interaction between the network structure and the node attributes, which leads to more accurate community detection as well as improved robustness in the presence of noise in the network structure. CESNA has a linear runtime in the network size and is able to process networks an order of magnitude larger than comparable approaches. Last, CESNA also helps with the interpretation of detected communities by finding relevant node attributes for each community.
Our detection problem is also related to community detection, which, as one of the key topics in network science and graph mining, aims to extract tightly connected subgraphs in a network, also known as graph partitioning and graph clustering @cite_50 @cite_59 @cite_78 . While the traditional community detection algorithms focus on the graph structure only @cite_32 @cite_79 , some recent studies tried to combine the knowledge of both graph structure and node attributes @cite_10 as such attributes not only improve the accuracy of community detection, but also provide the interpretation of detected communities. However, as not all attributes are relevant for all communities, community detection accuracy may suffer. It is also computational inefficient to include a large number of attributes in the training phase @cite_64 . We here aim to find useful attributes for improving community detection and aiding interpretation; as an example, in , the proposed statistics select useful keywords in a co-authorship network.