Summaries of meetings are very important as they convey the essential content of discussions in a concise form. Both participants and non-participants are interested in the summaries of meetings to plan for their future work. Generally, it is time consuming to read and understand the whole documents. Therefore, summaries play an important role as the readers are interested in only the important context of discussions. In this work, we address the task of meeting document summarization. Automatic summarization systems on meeting conversations developed so far have been primarily extractive, resulting in unacceptable summaries that are hard to read. The extracted utterances contain disfluencies that affect the quality of the extractive summaries. To make summaries much more readable, we propose an approach to generating abstractive summaries by fusing important content from several utterances. We first separate meeting transcripts into various topic segments, and then identify the important utterances in each segment using a supervised learning approach. The important utterances are then combined together to generate a one-sentence summary. In the text generation step, the dependency parses of the utterances in each segment are combined together to create a directed graph. The most informative and well-formed sub-graph obtained by integer linear programming (ILP) is selected to generate a one-sentence summary for each topic segment. The ILP formulation reduces disfluencies by leveraging grammatical relations that are more prominent in non-conversational style of text, and therefore generates summaries that is comparable to human-written abstractive summaries. Experimental results show that our method can generate more informative summaries than the baselines. In addition, readability assessments by human judges as well as log-likelihood estimates obtained from the dependency parser show that our generated summaries are significantly readable and well-formed.
@cite_13: There has been increasing interest recently in meeting understanding, such as summarization, browsing, action item detection, and topic segmentation. However, there is very limited effort on using rich recognition output (e.g., recognition confidence measure or more recognition candidates) for these downstream tasks. This paper presents an initial study using n-best recognition hypotheses for two tasks, extractive summarization and keyword extraction. We extend the approach used on 1-best output to n-best hypotheses: MMR (maximum marginal relevance) for summarization and TFIDF (term frequency, inverse document frequency) weighting for keyword extraction. Our experiments on the ICSI meeting corpus demonstrate promising improvement using n-best hypotheses over 1-best output. These results suggest worthy future studies using n-best or lattices as the interface between speech recognition and downstream tasks.
@cite_10: We propose a novel approach for unsupervised extractive summarization. Our approach builds a semantic graph for the document to be summarized. Summary extraction is then formulated as optimizing submodular functions defined on the semantic graph. The optimization is theoretically guaranteed to be near-optimal under the framework of submodularity. Extensive experiments on the ICSI meeting summarization task on both human transcripts and automatic speech recognition (ASR) outputs show that the graph-based submodular selection approach consistently outperforms the maximum marginal relevance (MMR) approach, a concept-based approach using integer linear programming (ILP), and a recursive graph-based ranking algorithm using Google's PageRank.
In the field of meeting summarization, while extractive techniques have been widely employed so far @cite_10 @cite_13 , abstractive techniques, including sentence compression, template and graph-based approaches, have been focused on recently.