This paper is about regularizing deep convolutional networks (ConvNets) based on an adaptive multi-objective framework for transfer learning with limited training data in the target domain. Recent advances of ConvNets regularization in this context are commonly due to the use of additional regularization objectives. They guide the training away from the target task using some concrete tasks. Unlike those related approaches, we report that an objective without a concrete goal can serve surprisingly well as a regularizer. In particular, we demonstrate Pseudo-task Regularization (PtR) which dynamically regularizes a network by simply attempting to regress image representations to a pseudo-target during fine-tuning. Through numerous experiments, the improvements on classification accuracy by PtR are shown greater or on a par to the recent state-of-the-art methods. These results also indicate a room for rethinking on the requirements for a regularizer, i.e., if specifically designed task for regularization is indeed a key ingredient. The contributions of this paper are: a) PtR provides an effective and efficient alternative for regularization without dependence on concrete tasks or extra data; b) desired strength of regularization effect in PtR is dynamically adjusted and maintained based on the gradient norms of the target objective and the pseudo-task.
@cite_30: Deep neural nets with a large number of parameters are very powerful machine learning systems. However, overfitting is a serious problem in such networks. Large networks are also slow to use, making it difficult to deal with overfitting by combining the predictions of many different large neural nets at test time. Dropout is a technique for addressing this problem. The key idea is to randomly drop units (along with their connections) from the neural network during training. This prevents units from co-adapting too much. During training, dropout samples from an exponential number of different "thinned" networks. At test time, it is easy to approximate the effect of averaging the predictions of all these thinned networks by simply using a single unthinned network that has smaller weights. This significantly reduces overfitting and gives major improvements over other regularization methods. We show that dropout improves the performance of neural networks on supervised learning tasks in vision, speech recognition, document classification and computational biology, obtaining state-of-the-art results on many benchmark data sets.
@cite_14: 
@cite_22: Low-shot visual learning–the ability to recognize novel object categories from very few examples–is a hallmark of human visual intelligence. Existing machine learning approaches fail to generalize in the same way. To make progress on this foundational problem, we present a low-shot learning benchmark on complex images that mimics challenges faced by recognition systems in the wild. We then propose (1) representation regularization techniques, and (2) techniques to hallucinate additional training examples for data-starved classes. Together, our methods improve the effectiveness of convolutional networks in low-shot learning, improving the one-shot accuracy on novel classes by 2.3× on the challenging ImageNet dataset.
The parameter norm penalty, or weight decay more specifically, has been one of the most common ways of regularization in training deep models. Our PtR leveraged weight decay by default, but we also evaluated PtR without weight decay to study its impact on accuracy. Another method being apparently similar to weight decay is to perform feature norm penalty (FNP) on the representation layer of a network @cite_22 . Superficially, FNP would resemble to PtR if the regression target for PtR was towards a static norm of zero without involving randomness (an additional feature of PtR which should be noted is that it also balances objectives automatically). The technical difference and benefit of PtR over FNP will be elaborated in Appendix . Dropout is also one of the standard techniques to improve model regularization by temporarily shielding a part of the hidden units in the bottleneck layer and fully connected layers during training @cite_30 @cite_14 . For the VGG-16 structures which we employed in our experiments, dropout was also used after flattened hidden layers.