The process of opinion formation through synthesis and contrast of different viewpoints has been the subject of many studies in economics and social sciences. Today, this process manifests itself also in online social networks and social media. The key characteristic of successful promotion campaigns is that they take into consideration such opinion-formation dynamics in order to create a overall favorable opinion about a specific information item, such as a person, a product, or an idea. In this paper, we adopt a well-established model for social-opinion dynamics and formalize the campaign-design problem as the problem of identifying a set of target individuals whose positive opinion about an information item will maximize the overall positive opinion for the item in the social network. We call this problem CAMPAIGN. We study the complexity of the CAMPAIGN problem, and design algorithms for solving it. Our experiments on real data demonstrate the efficiency and practical utility of our algorithms.
@cite_4: The question of how people form their opinion has fascinated economists and sociologists for quite some time. In many of the models, a group of people in a social network, each holding a numerical opinion, arrive at a shared opinion through repeated averaging with their neighbors in the network. Motivated by the observation that consensus is rarely reached in real opinion dynamics, we study a related sociological model in which individuals' intrinsic beliefs counterbalance the averaging process and yield a diversity of opinions. By interpreting the repeated averaging as best-response dynamics in an underlying game with natural payoffs, and the limit of the process as an equilibrium, we are able to study the cost of disagreement in these models relative to a social optimum. We provide a tight bound on the cost at equilibrium relative to the optimum; our analysis draws a connection between these agreement models and extremal problems that lead to generalized eigenvalues. We also consider a natural network design problem in this setting: which links can we add to the underlying network to reduce the cost of disagreement at equilibrium?
Key to our paper is the work by @cite_4 . In fact, we adopt the same opinion-dynamics model as in @cite_4 , where individuals selfishly form opinions to minimize their personal cost. However, focus on quantifying the social cost of this lack of central coordination between individuals, i.e., the , and they consider a network-design problem with the objective of reducing the social cost at equilibrium. Our work on the other hand, focuses on designing a promotion campaign so that, at equilibrium, the overall positive inclination towards a particular opinion is maximized.