Human interaction involves very sophisticated non-verbal communication skills like understanding the goals and actions of others and coordinating our own actions accordingly. Neuroscience refers to this mechanism as motor resonance, in the sense that the perception of another person's actions and sensory experiences activates the observer's brain as if (s)he would be performing the same actions and having the same experiences. We analyze and model non-verbal cues (arm movements) exchanged between two humans that interact and execute handover actions. The contributions of this paper are the following: (i) computational models, using recorded motion data, describing the motor behaviour of each actor in action-in-interaction situations, (ii) a computational model that captures the behaviour if the "giver" and "receiver" during an object handover action, by coupling the arm motion of both actors, and (iii) embedded these models in the iCub robot for both action execution and recognition. Our results show that: (i) the robot can interpret the human arm motion and recognize handover actions; and (ii) behave in a "human-like" manner to receive the object of the recognized handover action.
@cite_24: A key requirement for seamless human-robot collaboration is for the robot to make its intentions clear to its human collaborator. A collaborative robot's motion must be legible, or intent-expressive. Legibility is often described in the literature as and effect of predictable, unsurprising, or expected motion. Our central insight is that predictability and legibility are fundamentally different and often contradictory properties of motion. We develop a formalism to mathematically define and distinguish predictability and legibility of motion. We formalize the two based on inferences between trajectories and goals in opposing directions, drawing the analogy to action interpretation in psychology. We then propose mathematical models for these inferences based on optimizing cost, drawing the analogy to the principle of rational action. Our experiments validate our formalism's prediction that predictability and legibility can contradict, and provide support for our models. Our findings indicate that for robots to seamlessly collaborate with humans, they must change the way they plan their motion.
@cite_26: Here, we propose that bidirectionality in implicit motor coordination between humanoid robots and humans could enhance the social competence of human–robot interactions. We first detail some questions pertaining to human–robot interactions, introducing the Uncanny Valley hypothesis. After introducing a framework pertinent for the understanding of natural social interactions, motor resonance, we examine two behaviors derived from this framework: motor coordination, investigated in and informative about human–human interaction, and motor interference, which demonstrate the relevance of the motor resonance framework to describe human perception of humanoid robots. These two lines of investigation are then put together to “close the loop” by proposing to implement a key feature of motor coordination, bidirectionality, in robots’ behavior. Finally, we discuss the feasibility of implementing motor coordination between humanoid robots and humans, and the consequences of this implementation in enhancing the social competence of robots interacting with humans. Keywords: interpersonal interaction, motor resonance, motor coordination, motor interference, social robotics, anthropomorphism
The work discussed above has focused on either intrapersonal coupling, synchronization, and action understanding from the gaze behavior of two agents. Notwithstanding, understanding of the arm movements in humans and robots is also a focus of extensive work. @cite_24 have created a framework for evaluating predictable and legible arm movements for humans and robots. Where legibility is am exaggerated motion towards the end-goal, and the predictable is a natural human movement. Nonetheless, there is no guarantee of generalization for all types of scenarios. yet no understanding whether this is present in HHI, and in retrospect, HRI scenarios. Although, to improve social interactions, robots and humans should mutually influence each other @cite_26 .