title: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/357 of 5 March 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

text:
               6.3.2015

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               L 62/1

         COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/357
   of 5 March 2015
   implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine
   THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
   Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
   Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (1), and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,
   Whereas:

               (1)

               On 5 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 208/2014.

               (2)

               On the basis of a review by the Council, the entries for 18 persons should be amended.

               (3)

               Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,

         HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
   Article 1
   Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 is replaced by the text appearing in the Annex to this Regulation.
   Article 2
   This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

      This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
      Done at Brussels, 5 March 2015.

            For the Council

            The President

         D. REIZNIECE-OZOLA

      (1)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.

      ANNEX

            ‘ANNEX I

               List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Article 2

                        Name

                        Identifying information

                        Statement of reasons

                        Date of listing

                        1.

                        Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych
                        (Віктор Федорович Янукович),
                        Viktor Fedorovich Yanukovich
                        (Виктор Фёдорович Янукович)

                        born on 9 July 1950 in Yenakiieve (Donetsk oblast), former President of Ukraine

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        2.

                        Vitalii Yuriyovych Zakharchenko
                        (Віталій Юрійович Захарченко),
                        Vitaliy Yurievich Zakharchenko
                        (Виталий Юрьевич Захарченко)

                        born on 20 January 1963 in Kostiantynivka (Donetsk oblast), former Minister of Internal Affairs

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        3.

                        Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka
                        (Віктор Павлович Пшонка)

                        born on 6 February 1954 in Serhiyivka (Donetsk oblast), former Prosecutor General of Ukraine

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        4.

                        Olena Leonidivna Lukash
                        (Олена Леонідівна Лукаш),
                        Elena Leonidovna Lukash
                        (Елена Леонидовна Лукаш)

                        born on 12 November 1976 in Rîbnița (Moldova), former Minister of Justice

                        Person subject to investigations by the Ukrainian authorities for the abuse of office as a public office-holder in order to procure an unjustified advantage for herself or for a third party and thereby causing a loss to Ukrainian public funds.

                        6.3.2014

                        5.

                        Andrii Petrovych Kliuiev
                        (Андрій Петрович Клюєв),
                        Andriy Petrovych Klyuyev

                        born on 12 August 1964 in Donetsk, former Head of Administration of President of Ukraine

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets and in connection with the misuse of office by a public office-holder to procure an unjustified advantage for himself or a third party thereby causing a loss to the Ukrainian public budget or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        6.

                        Viktor Ivanovych Ratushniak
                        (Віктор Іванович Ратушняк)

                        born on 16 October 1959, former Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets and for being an accomplice thereto.

                        6.3.2014

                        7.

                        Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych
                        (Олександр Вікторович Янукович)

                        born on 10 July 1973 in Yenakiieve (Donetsk oblast), son of former President, businessman

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        8.

                        Viktor Viktorovych Yanukovych
                        (Віктор Вікторович Янукович)

                        born on 16 July 1981 in Yenakiieve (Donetsk oblast), son of former President, Member of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine

                        Person subject to investigations by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets. Person associated with a designated person (former President of Ukraine, Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych) subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        9.

                        Artem Viktorovych Pshonka
                        (Артем Вікторович Пшонка)

                        born on 19 March 1976 in Kramatorsk (Donetsk oblast), son of former Prosecutor General, Deputy Head of the faction of Party of Regions in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets and for being an accomplice thereto.

                        6.3.2014

                        10.

                        Serhii Petrovych Kliuiev
                        (Сергій Петрович Клюєв),
                        Serhiy Petrovych Klyuyev

                        born on 19 August 1969 in Donetsk, brother of Mr Andrii Kliuiev, businessman

                        Person subject to investigation by the Ukrainian authorities for involvement in the misappropriation of public funds or assets and in the abuse of public office as a public office-holder in order to procure an unjustified advantage for himself or for a third party and thereby causing a loss to Ukrainian public funds or assets. Person associated with a designated person (Andrii Petrovych Kliuiev) subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        11.

                        Mykola Yanovych Azarov
                        (Микола Янович Азаров),
                        Nikolai Yanovich Azarov
                        (Николай Янович Азаров)

                        born on 17 December 1947 in Kaluga (Russia), Prime Minister of Ukraine until January 2014

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        12.

                        Serhiy Vitaliyovych Kurchenko
                        (Сергій Віталійович Курченко)

                        born on 21 September 1985 in Kharkiv, businessman

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        13.

                        Dmytro Volodymyrovych Tabachnyk
                        (Дмитро Володимирович Табачник)

                        born on 28 November 1963 in Kiev, former Minister of Education and Science

                        Person subject to investigation by the Ukrainian authorities for the abuse of office as a public office-holder in order to procure an unjustified advantage for himself or for a third party and thereby causing a loss to Ukrainian public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        14.

                        Raisa Vasylivna Bohatyriova
                        (Раїса Василівна Богатирьова),
                        Raisa Vasilievna Bogatyreva
                        (Раиса Васильевна Богатырёва)

                        born on 6 January 1953 in Bakal (Chelyabinsk oblast, Russia), former Minister of Health

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        6.3.2014

                        15.

                        Serhiy Hennadiyovych Arbuzov
                        (Сергій Геннадійович Арбузов),
                        Sergei Gennadievich Arbuzov
                        (Сергей Геннадиевич Арбузов)

                        born on 24 March 1976 in Donetsk, former Prime Minister of Ukraine

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        15.4.2014

                        16.

                        Yuriy Volodymyrovych Ivanyushchenko
                        (Юрій Володимирович Іванющенко)

                        born on 21 February 1959 in Yenakiieve (Donetsk oblast), Party of Regions MP

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        15.4.2014

                        17.

                        Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko
                        (Олександр Вікторович Клименко)

                        born on 16 November 1980 in Makiivka (Donetsk oblast), former Minister of Revenues and Charges

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets and for the abuse of office by a public office-holder in order to procure an unjustified advantage for himself or for a third party and thereby causing a loss to Ukrainian public funds or assets.

                        15.4.2014

                        18.

                        Edward Stavytskyi,
                        Eduard Anatoliyovych Stavytsky
                        (Едуард Анатолійович Ставицький)

                        born on 4 October 1972 in Lebedyn (Sumy oblast), former Minister of Fuel and Energy of Ukraine
                        Reportedly residing in Israel. However, still in possession of his Ukrainian citizenship

                        Person subject to criminal proceedings by the Ukrainian authorities for the misappropriation of public funds or assets.

                        15.4.2014’


title: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1357 of 9 August 2016 making imports of certain heavy plate of non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in the People's Republic of China subject to registration

text:
               10.8.2016

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               L 215/23

         COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1357
   of 9 August 2016
   making imports of certain heavy plate of non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in the People's Republic of China subject to registration
   THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
   Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
   Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1) (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 14(5) thereof,
   After informing the Member States,
   Whereas:

               (1)

               On 13 February 2016, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated by a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union
                   (2) an anti-dumping investigation into imports into the Union of flat products of non-alloy or alloy steel (excluding stainless steel, silicon-electrical steel, tool steel and high-speed steel), hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated, not in coils, of a thickness exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 600 mm or more or of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more but not exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 2 050 mm or more (‘heavy plate’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’).

         1.   PRODUCT CONCERNED

               (2)

               The product subject to registration (‘product concerned’) is flat products of non-alloy or alloy steel (excluding stainless steel, silicon-electrical steel, tool steel and high-speed steel), hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated, not in coils, of a thickness exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 600 mm or more or of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more but not exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 2 050 mm or more currently falling within CN codes ex 7208 51 20, ex 7208 51 91, ex 7208 51 98, ex 7208 52 91, ex 7208 90 20, ex 7208 90 80, 7225 40 40, ex 7225 40 60 and ex 7225 99 00 (‘heavy plate’) and originating in the PRC. These CN codes are given for information only.

         2.   REQUEST

               (3)

               The registration request pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation was made by the complainant on 18 April 2016. It was supplemented by additional information on 7 July 2016. The complainant requested that imports of the product concerned are made subject to registration so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.

         3.   GROUNDS FOR THE REGISTRATION

               (4)

               According to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission may direct the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports, so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports. Imports may be made subject to registration following a request from the Union industry, which contains sufficient evidence to justify such action.

               (5)

               The complainant claims that registration is justified as the product concerned continues to be dumped and that importers were well aware of dumping practices which stretched over an extended period of time and were causing injury to the Union industry. The complainant further claims that imports from the PRC are causing injury to the Union industry and that there was a substantial increase in the level of these imports, even following the investigation period, which would seriously undermine the remedial effect of the anti-dumping duty, if such a duty is to be applied.

         3.1.   Importers were or should have been aware of the dumping and injury alleged or found

               (6)

               The Commission considers that the importers were aware, or should have been aware, of the exporting producers' dumping practices. Sufficient prima facie evidence in this regard was contained in the complaint and this was spelled out in the notice of initiation for this proceeding (3). The non-confidential version of the complaint estimated dumping margins of 28 % to 73 % for imports from the PRC. The complainant provided in the complaint sufficient evidence in which the dumping practices by exporting producers from the PRC are described and which prima facie could and should not have been ignored by importers. In particular, the complainant provided in the complaint evidence on the comparison between a normal value determined on the basis of pricing information reported in the USITC Final Report (for the period July 2014 to June 2015) with the export price based on the quarterly average unit value for imports of heavy plate from the PRC for the applicable CN codes as derived from Eurostat data. Furthermore, the complainant also included prima facie evidence in the complaint on the decreasing trend of the import prices for the PRC. The average sales price of imports from the PRC to the Union decreased by 25 % between 2012 and the period October 2014-September 2015. In the request for registration, average import prices from the PRC for the investigation period (2015) were compared with prices for 2012, showing a decrease of around 30 %. Finally, in the complaint there is sufficient prima facie evidence that injury is being caused. Based on all these information contained in the non-confidential version of the complaint, but also given the extent of the dumping that may be occurring and that the information available to the complainants was publicly available, it is reasonable to conclude, based on prima facie evidence available to the Commission, that the importers were aware, or should have been aware, of the dumping and the injury alleged or found.

         3.2.   Further substantial rise in imports

               (7)

               Since the initiation of the proceeding in February 2016, a further increase of approximately 15 % for the PRC is observed when comparing the import volumes during the investigation period (2015) with data available for the period following the initiation (March to May 2016). This shows that there was a further substantial rise in imports from the PRC of the product concerned in the first three months following the initiation of the present investigation.

         3.3.   Undermining of the remedial effect of the duty

               (8)

               In the submissions made in the framework of the investigation, including the registration request, there is evidence that additional injury would be caused by a continued rise in these imports at further decreasing prices. As regards prices, the complainant included prima facie evidence in the request for registration on the decreasing trend of the import prices for the PRC. As for the evolution of import prices after the initiation of the case in February 2016, a further drop of around 30 % was observed for average import prices from the PRC when comparing prices of March-May 2016 with prices for the investigation period (2015). Further substantial rise in imports, for which there is sufficient prima facie evidence as referred to in recital 6, is likely, in light of its timing, the volume of the alleged dumped imports and other circumstances (such as the excess capacity in the PRC and pricing behaviour of Chinese exporting producers) to seriously undermine the remedial effect of any definitive duty, unless such duty would be applied retroactively.

               (9)

               In addition, in view of the initiation of the current proceeding and taking into account the developments of imports from the PRC in terms of prices and volumes hitherto, it is reasonable to assume that the level of imports of the product concerned may further increase prior to the adoption of provisional measures, if any, and inventories may be rapidly built up by the importers.

         4.   PROCEDURE

               (10)

               In view of the above, the Commission has concluded that the complainant provided sufficient prima facie evidence to justify making imports of the product concerned subject to registration in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.

               (11)

               All interested parties are invited to make their views known in writing and to provide supporting evidence. Furthermore, the Commission may hear interested parties, provided that they make a request in writing and show that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.

         5.   REGISTRATION

               (12)

               Pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation imports of the product concerned should be made subject to registration for the purpose of ensuring that, should the investigation result in findings leading to the imposition of an anti-dumping duty, this duty can, if the necessary conditions are fulfilled, be levied retroactively on the registered imports in accordance with Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation.

               (13)

               The complainant estimates in the complaint dumping margins of 28 % to 73 % and an average undercutting margin of 11 % for imports of the product concerned from the PRC. The estimated amount of possible future liability is set for the PRC at least at the level of undercutting estimated on the basis of the complaint, i.e. 11 % ad valorem on the CIF import value of the product concerned.

         6.   PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA

               (14)

               Any personal data collected in the context of this registration will be treated in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4),

         HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
   Article 1
   1.   The customs authorities are hereby directed, pursuant to Article 14(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) to take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Union of flat products of non-alloy or alloy steel (excluding stainless steel, silicon-electrical steel, tool steel and high-speed steel), hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated, not in coils, of a thickness exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 600 mm or more or of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more but not exceeding 10 mm and of a width of 2 050 mm or more currently falling within CN codes ex 7208 51 20, ex 7208 51 91, ex 7208 51 98, ex 7208 52 91, ex 7208 90 20, ex 7208 90 80, 7225 40 40, ex 7225 40 60 and ex 7225 99 00 (TARIC codes: 7208512010, 7208519110, 7208519810, 7208529110, 7208902010, 7208908020, 7225406010, 7225990030) and originating in the People's Republic of China.
   Registration shall expire nine months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
   2.   All interested parties are invited to make their views known in writing, to provide supporting evidence or to request to be heard within 20 days from the date of publication of this Regulation.
   Article 2
   This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

      This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
      Done at Brussels, 9 August 2016.

            For the Commission

            The President

         Jean-Claude JUNCKER

      (1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

      (2)  OJ C 58, 13.2.2016, p. 20.

      (3)  OJ C 58, 13.2.2016, p. 20 (section 3 of the notice of initiation).

      (4)  Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).

      (5)  Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21).


title: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1958 of 4 November 2016 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

text:
                  9.11.2016

                  EN

                  Official Journal of the European Union

                  L 301/9

            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1958
      of 4 November 2016
      concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
      THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
      Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
      Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (1), and in particular Article 57(4) and Article 58(2) thereof,
      Whereas:

                  (1)

                  In order to ensure uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature annexed to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (2), it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the classification of the goods referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

                  (2)

                  Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 has laid down the general rules for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature. Those rules apply also to any other nomenclature which is wholly or partly based on it or which adds any additional subdivision to it and which is established by specific provisions of the Union, with a view to the application of tariff and other measures relating to trade in goods.

                  (3)

                  Pursuant to those general rules, the goods described in column (1) of the table set out in the Annex should be classified under the CN code indicated in column (2), by virtue of the reasons set out in column (3) of that table.

                  (4)

                  It is appropriate to provide that binding tariff information issued in respect of the goods concerned by this Regulation which does not conform to this Regulation may, for a certain period, continue to be invoked by the holder in accordance with Article 34(9) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. That period should be set at 3 months.

                  (5)

                  The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,

            HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
      Article 1
      The goods described in column (1) of the table set out in the Annex shall be classified within the Combined Nomenclature under the CN code indicated in column (2) of that table.
      Article 2
      Binding tariff information which does not conform to this Regulation may continue to be invoked in accordance with Article 34(9) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 for a period of 3 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
      Article 3
      This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

         This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
         Done at Brussels, 4 November 2016.

               For the Commission,

               On behalf of the President,

            Stephen QUEST

               Director-General for Taxation and Customs Union

         (1)  OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1.

         (2)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

         ANNEX

                     Description of the goods

                     Classification
                     (CN code)

                     Reasons

                     (1)

                     (2)

                     (3)

                     An article consisting of 27 sockets in a housing (a so-called ‘power distribution unit’) with dimensions of approximately 5 × 8 × 173 cm. The housing is fitted with an electrical cable of a length of approximately 3 m, and a plug for connection to an electrical power mains socket.
                     It is presented to be used for supplying electricity of 230 V to various rack-mounted components in a cabinet. The article is mounted in a vertical position in standard network enclosures. The article also logs and transmits internal data (such as electricity, voltage, output and usage) and alarm messages (if values go above or below certain thresholds) via the included communication card.
                     See image (*).

                     8537 10 99

                     Classification is determined by general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 8537 , 8537 10  and 8537 10 99 .
                     Classification under heading 8544  as a cable fitted with connectors is excluded, since the article is designed to function as an apparatus for the distribution of electricity.
                     As the article consists of several sockets, a cable and a device to communicate, it is to be classified under CN code 8537 10 99  as other boards, panels, consoles, desks, cabinets and other bases, equipped with two or more apparatus of heading 8535  or 8536  for the distribution of electricity.

            (*)  The image is purely for information.


title: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1142/2011 of 10 November 2011 establishing Annexes X and XI to Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations

text:
               11.11.2011

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               L 293/24

         COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1142/2011
   of 10 November 2011
   establishing Annexes X and XI to Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations
   THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
   Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 291(2) thereof,
   Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations (1), and in particular Article 73(1) and (2) thereof,
   Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (2), and in particular Article 70 thereof,
   Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (3),
   Whereas:

               (1)

               Annex X to Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 shall list administrative authorities referred to in Article 2(2) of that Regulation.

               (2)

               Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom have notified the Commission of administrative authorities to be listed in Annex X to Regulation (EC) No 4/2009.

               (3)

               The administrative authorities notified by Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom and listed in Annex I satisfy the requirements set out in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009.

               (4)

               Annex XI to Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 shall list competent authorities referred to in Article 47(3) of that Regulation.

               (5)

               Finland has notified the Commission of a competent authority to be listed in Annex XI to Regulation (EC) No 4/2009.

               (6)

               The United Kingdom and Ireland are bound by Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 and are therefore taking part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.

               (7)

               In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application, without prejudice to the possibility for Denmark of implementing its content pursuant to the Agreement of 19 October 2005 between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (4)

               (8)

               The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee concerning applicable law, jurisdiction and enforcement in matrimonial matters, parental responsibility and maintenance obligations.

               (9)

               Annexes X and XI to Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 should therefore be established accordingly,

         HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
   Article 1
   The text of Annexes X and XI to Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 is set out in Annexes I and II to this Regulation.
   Article 2
   This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

      This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
      Done at Brussels, 10 November 2011.

            For the Commission

            The President

         José Manuel BARROSO

      (1)  OJ L 7, 10.1.2009, p. 1.

      (2)  OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p. 1.

      (3)  OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13.

      (4)  OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 62.

      ANNEX I

            ‘ANNEX X
            The administrative authorities referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 are as follows:

                        —

                        in Finland, the Social Welfare Board (“Sosiaalilautakunta/Socialnämnd”),

                        —

                        in Sweden, the Enforcement Authority (“Kronofogdemyndigheten”),

                        —

                        in the United Kingdom:

                                    (a)

                                    in England and Wales and Scotland, the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CMEC);

                                    (b)

                                    in Northern Ireland, the Department for Social Development Northern Ireland (DSDNI).’

      ANNEX II

            ‘ANNEX XI
            The competent authorities referred to in Article 47(3) of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 are as follows:

                        —

                        in Finland, the Legal Aid Office (“Oikeusaputoimisto/Rättshjälpsbyrå”).’


title: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1227 of 27 July 2016 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 on the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and on the relevant methods of analysis

text:
               28.7.2016

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               L 202/7

         COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1227
   of 27 July 2016
   amending Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 on the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and on the relevant methods of analysis
   THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
   Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
   Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular point (d) of the first paragraph and the second paragraph of Article 91 thereof,
   Whereas:

               (1)

               Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 (2) defines the chemical and organoleptic characteristics of olive and olive-pomace oil and lays down methods of assessing those characteristics. Those methods are regularly updated on the basis of the opinion of chemical experts and in line with the work carried out within the International Olive Council (IOC).

               (2)

               In order to ensure the implementation at Union level of the most recent international standards established by the IOC, the method for the determination of free acidity and the method related to the organoleptic assessment of virgin olive oils set out in Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 should be updated.

               (3)

               Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 should therefore be amended accordingly.

               (4)

               The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

         HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
   Article 1
   Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 is amended as follows:

               (1)

               Annex II is replaced by the text set out in Annex I to this Regulation;

               (2)

               Annex XII is amended in accordance with Annex II to this Regulation.

         Article 2
   This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

      This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
      Done at Brussels, 27 July 2016.

            For the Commission

            The President

         Jean-Claude JUNCKER

      (1)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

      (2)  Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 of 11 July 1991 on the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and on the relevant methods of analysis (OJ L 248, 5.9.1991, p. 1).

      ANNEX I

            ‘ANNEX II

               DETERMINATION OF FREE FATTY ACIDS, COLD METHOD

            1.   SCOPE AND FIELD OF APPLICATION
            This method describes the determination of free fatty acids in olive oils and olive pomace oils. The content of free fatty acids is expressed as acidity calculated as the percentage of oleic acid.
            2.   PRINCIPLE
            A sample is dissolved in a mixture of solvents and the free fatty acids present titrated using a potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide solution.
            3.   REAGENTS
            All the reagents should be of recognized analytical quality and the water used either distilled or of equivalent purity.
            3.1   Diethyl ether; 95 % ethanol (v/v), mixture of equal parts by volume.
            Neutralize precisely at the moment of use with the potassium hydroxide solution (3.2), with the addition of 0,3 ml of the phenolphthalein solution (3.3) per 100 ml of mixture.

                           Note 1:

                        Diethyl ether is highly inflammable and may form explosive peroxides. Special care should be taken in its use.

                           Note 2:

                        If it is not possible to use diethyl ether, a mixture of solvents containing ethanol and toluene may be used. If necessary, ethanol may be replaced by propanol-2.

                  3.2   Potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide, titrated ethanolic or aqueous solution, c(KOH) [or c(NaOH)] about 0,1 mol/l or, if necessary, c(KOH) [or c(NaOH)] about 0,5 mol/l. Commercial solutions are available.
            The exact concentration of potassium hydroxide solution (or sodium hydroxide solution) must be known and checked prior to use. Use a solution prepared at least five days before use and decanted into a brown glass bottle with a rubber stopper. The solution should be colourless or straw coloured.
            If phase separation is observed when using aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide (or sodium hydroxide), replace the aqueous solution by an ethanolic solution.

                           Note 3:

                        A stable colourless solution of potassium hydroxide (or sodium hydroxide) may be prepared as follows. Bring to the boil 1 000 ml of ethanol or water with 8 g of potassium hydroxide (or sodium hydroxide) and 0,5 g of aluminium shavings and continue boiling under reflux for one hour. Distil immediately. Dissolve in the distillate the required quantity of potassium hydroxide (or sodium hydroxide). Leave for several days and decant the clear supernatant liquid from the precipitate of potassium carbonate (or sodium carbonate).

                  The solution may also be prepared without distillation as follows: to 1 000 ml of ethanol (or water) add 4 ml of aluminium butylate and leave the mixture for several days. Decant the supernatant liquid and dissolve the required quantity of potassium hydroxide (or sodium hydroxide). The solution is ready for use.
            3.3   Phenolphthalein, 10 g/l solution in 95 to 96 % ethanol (v/v) or alkali blue 6B or thymolphthalein, 20 g/l solution in 95 to 96 % ethanol (v/v). In the case of strongly coloured oils, alkali blue or thymolphthalein shall be used.
            4.   APPARATUS
            Usual laboratory equipment including:

                        4.1

                        Analytical balance;

                        4.2

                        250 ml conical flask;

                        4.3

                        10 ml burette class A, graduated in 0,05 ml, or equivalent automatic burette.

                  5.   PROCEDURE
            5.1   Preparation of the test sample

            When the sample is cloudy, it should be filtered.
            5.2   Test portion

            Take a sample depending on the presumed acidity in accordance with the following table:

                        Expected acidity
                        (oleic acidity g/100 g)

                        Mass of sample (g)

                        Weighing accuracy (g)

                        0 to 2

                        10

                        0,02

                        > 2 to 7,5

                        2,5

                        0,01

                        > 7,5

                        0,5

                        0,001

                  Weigh the sample in the conical flask (4.2).
            5.3   Determination

            Dissolve the sample (5.2) in 50 to 100 ml of the previously neutralized mixture of diethyl ether and ethanol (3.1).
            Titrate while stirring with the 0,1 mol/l solution of potassium hydroxide (or sodium hydroxide) (3.2) (see Note 4) until the indicator changes (the colour of the coloured indicator persists for at least 10 seconds).

                           Note 4:

                        If the quantity of 0,1 mol/l potassium hydroxide (or sodium hydroxide) solution required exceeds 10 ml, use the 0,5 mol/l solution or change the sample mass according to the expected free acidity and the proposed table.

                           Note 5:

                        If the solution becomes cloudy during titration, add enough of the solvents (3.1) to give a clear solution.

                  Carry out a second determination only if the first result is higher than the specified limit for the category of the oil.
            6.   EXPRESSION OF RESULTS
            Acidity as a percentage of oleic acid by weight is equal to:

            where:

                        V

                        =

                        the volume of titrated potassium hydroxide solution (or sodium hydroxide) used, in millilitres;

                        c

                        =

                        the exact concentration in moles per litre of the titrated solution of potassium hydroxide (or sodium hydroxide) used;

                        M

                        =

                        282 g/mol, the molar mass in grams per mole of oleic acid;

                        m

                        =

                        the mass of the sample, in grams.

                  Oleic acidity is reported as follows:

                        (a)

                        to two decimal places for values from 0 up to and including 1;

                        (b)

                        to one decimal place for values from 1 up to and including 100.’

      ANNEX II
      Annex XII to Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 is amended as follows:

                  (1)

                  point 3.3 is replaced by the following:
                  ‘3.3.   Optional terminology for labelling purposes

                  Upon request, the panel leader may certify that the oils which have been assessed comply with the definitions and ranges corresponding solely to the following terms according to the intensity and perception of the attributes.
                  Positive attributes (fruity, bitter and pungent): According to the intensity of perception:

                              —

                                 Robust, when the median of the attribute is more than 6;

                              —

                                 Medium, when the median of the attribute is between 3 and 6;

                              —

                                 Delicate, when the median of the attribute is less than 3.

                                 Fruitiness

                              Set of olfactory sensations characteristic of the oil which depends on the variety of olive and comes from sound, fresh olives in which neither green nor ripe fruitiness predominates. It is perceived directly and/or through the back of the nose.

                                 Green fruitiness

                              Set of olfactory sensations characteristic of the oil which is reminiscent of green fruit, depends on the variety of olive and comes from green, sound, fresh olives. It is perceived directly and/or through the back of the nose.

                                 Ripe fruitiness

                              Set of olfactory sensations characteristic of the oil which is reminiscent of ripe fruit, depends on the variety of olive and comes from sound, fresh olives. It is perceived directly and/or through the back of the nose.

                                 Well balanced

                              Oil which does not display a lack of balance, by which is meant the olfactory- gustatory and tactile sensation where the median of the bitter attribute and the median of the pungent attribute are not more than 2 points above the median of the fruitiness.

                                 Mild oil

                              Oil for which the median of the bitter and pungent attributes is 2 or less.

                        List of terms according to the intensity of perception:

                              Terms subject to production of an organoleptic test certificate

                              Median of the attribute

                              Fruitiness

                              —

                              Ripe fruitiness

                              —

                              Green fruitiness

                              —

                              Delicate fruitiness

                              Less than 3

                              Medium fruitiness

                              Between 3 and 6

                              Robust fruitiness

                              More than 6

                              Delicate ripe fruitiness

                              Less than 3

                              Medium ripe fruitiness

                              Between 3 and 6

                              Robust ripe fruitiness

                              More than 6

                              Delicate green fruitiness

                              Less than 3

                              Medium green fruitiness

                              Between 3 and 6

                              Robust green fruitiness

                              More than 6

                              Delicate bitterness

                              Less than 3

                              Medium bitterness

                              Between 3 and 6

                              Robust bitterness

                              More than 6

                              Delicate pungency

                              Less than 3

                              Medium pungency

                              Between 3 and 6

                              Robust pungency

                              More than 6

                              Well balanced oil

                              The median of the bitter attribute and the median of the pungent attribute are not more than 2 points above the median of the fruitiness

                              Mild oil

                              The median of the bitter attribute and the median of the pungent attribute are not more than 2’

                  (2)

                  point 9.1.1 is replaced by the following:

                              ‘9.1.1.

                              The tasters shall pick up the glass, keeping it covered with the watch-glass, and shall bend it gently; they shall then rotate the glass fully in this position so as to wet the inside as much as possible. Once this stage is completed, they shall remove the watch-glass and smell the sample, taking slow deep breaths to evaluate the oil. Smelling should not exceed 30 seconds. If no conclusion has been reached during this time, they shall take a short rest before trying again.
                              When the olfactory test has been performed, the tasters shall then evaluate the buccal sensations (overall retronasal olfactory, gustatory and tactile sensations). To do so, they shall take a small sip of approximately 3 ml of oil. It is very important to distribute the oil throughout the whole of the mouth cavity, from the front part of the mouth and tongue along the sides to the back part and to the palate support and throat, since it is a known fact that the perception of tastes and tactile sensations varies in intensity depending on the area of the tongue, palate and throat.
                              It should be stressed that it is essential for a sufficient amount of the oil to be spread very slowly over the back of the tongue towards the palate support and throat while the taster concentrates on the order in which the bitter and pungent stimuli appear. If this is not done, both of these stimuli may escape notice in some oils or else the bitter stimulus may be obscured by the pungent stimulus.
                              Taking short, successive breaths, drawing in air through the mouth, enables the taster not only to spread the sample extensively over the whole of the mouth but also to perceive the volatile aromatic compounds via the back of the nose by forcing the use of this channel.

                                 NB: When the tasters do not perceive fruitiness in a sample and the intensity of the classifying negative attribute is 3,5 or less the panel leader may decide to arrange for the tasters to analyse the sample again at ambient temperature (COI/T.20/Doc. No 6/Rev. 1, September 2007, section 3 — General specifications for installation of a test room) while specifying the context and concept of ambient temperature. When the sample reaches room temperature, the tasters should re-assess it to check solely whether fruitiness is perceived. If it is, they should mark the intensity on the scale.
                              The tactile sensation of pungency should be taken into consideration. For this purpose it is advisable to ingest the oil.’

                  (3)

                  point 9.4 is replaced by the following:
                  ‘9.4.   Classification of the oil

                  The oil is graded as follows in line with the median of the defects and the median for the fruity attribute. The median of the defects is defined as the median of the defect perceived with the greatest intensity. The median of the defects and the median of the fruity attribute are expressed to one decimal place.
                  The oil is graded by comparing the median value of the defects and the median of the fruity attribute with the reference ranges given below. The error of the method has been taken into account when establishing the limits of these ranges, which are therefore considered to be absolute. The software packages allow the grading to be displayed as a table of statistics or a graph.

                              (a)

                              Extra virgin olive oil: the median of the defects is 0 and the median of the fruity attribute is above 0;

                              (b)

                              Virgin olive oil: the median of the defects is above 0 but not more than 3,5 and the median of the fruity attribute is above 0;

                              (c)

                              Lampante virgin olive oil: the median of the defects is above 3,5 or the median of the defects is less than or equal to 3,5 and the fruity median is equal to 0.

                                 Note 1:

                              When the median of the bitter and/or pungent attribute is more than 5,0, the panel leader shall state so on the test certificate.
                              For assessments intended to monitor compliance, one test shall be carried out. In the case of counter assessments, the analysis must be carried out in duplicate in different tasting sessions. The results of the duplicate analysis must be statistically homogenous. (See point 9.5). If not, the sample must be reanalysed twice again. The final value of the median of the classification attributes will be calculated using the average of both medians.’

                  (4)

                  the following point 9.5 is added:
                  ‘9.5   Criteria for the acceptance and rejection of duplicates

                  The normalised error, defined below, shall be used to determine whether the two results of a duplicate analysis are homogenous or statistically acceptable:

                  Where Me1 and Me2 are the medians of the two duplicates (respectively first and second analysis) and U1 and U2 are the expanded uncertainties obtained for the two values, calculated as follows as specified in Appendix:

                     U
                     1 = c × s* and

                  For the expanded uncertainty, c = 1,96; hence:
                  U1 = 0,0196 × CVr × Me1

                  where CVr
                      is the robust coefficient of variation.
                  For it to be stated that the two values obtained are not statistically different, En
                      must be equal to or less than 1,0.’


title: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/931 of 31 May 2017 laying down the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities covered by the applications for import licences lodged from 19 May 2017 to 26 May 2017 under the tariff quotas opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081 for certain cereals originating in Ukraine

text:
               1.6.2017

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               L 141/10

         COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/931
   of 31 May 2017
   laying down the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities covered by the applications for import licences lodged from 19 May 2017 to 26 May 2017 under the tariff quotas opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081 for certain cereals originating in Ukraine
   THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
   Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
   Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 188(1) and (3) thereof,
   Whereas:

               (1)

               Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081 (2) opened import tariff quotas for certain cereals originating in Ukraine.

               (2)

               Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081 set, for the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017 the quantity of the quota with order number 09.4306 at 960 000 tonnes.

               (3)

               The quantities covered by the applications for import licences lodged from 19 May 2017 from 13.00 to 26 May 2017 at 13.00 (Brussels time) exceed those available for the quota with order number 09.4306. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested under the quota concerned, calculated in accordance with Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (3).

               (4)

               No further import licences should be issued for the tariff quota with order number 09.4306 referred to in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081 for the current quota period.

               (5)

               In order to ensure the efficiency of the measure, this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,

         HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
   Article 1
   1.   The quantities covered by the applications for import licences under the quota with order number 09.4306 and referred to in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081, lodged from 19 May 2017 from 13.00 to 26 May 2017 at 13.00 (Brussels time), shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 86,524176 % for applications lodged under the tariff quota with order number 09.4306.
   2.   The submission of new import licence applications under the quota with order number 09.4306 referred to in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081 shall be suspended from 26 May 2017 at 13.00 (Brussels time) for the current quota period.
   Article 2
   This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

      This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
      Done at Brussels, 31 May 2017.

            For the Commission,

            On behalf of the President,

         Jerzy PLEWA

            Director-General

            Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

      (1)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

      (2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081 of 18 November 2015 opening and providing for the administration of import tariff quotas for certain cereals originating in Ukraine (OJ L 302, 19.11.2015, p. 81).

      (3)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13).


title: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 823/2014 of 28 July 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

text:
               29.7.2014

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               L 223/22

         COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 823/2014
   of 28 July 2014
   establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
   THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
   Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
   Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),
   Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,
   Whereas:

               (1)

               Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

               (2)

               The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,

         HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
   Article 1
   The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.
   Article 2
   This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

      This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
      Done at Brussels, 28 July 2014.

            For the Commission,

            On behalf of the President,

         Jerzy PLEWA

            Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

      (1)  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

      (2)  OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.

      ANNEX
      Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

                  (EUR/100 kg)

                  CN code

                  Third country code (1)

                  Standard import value

                  0702 00 00

                  TR

                  44,1

                  XS

                  56,8

                  ZZ

                  50,5

                  0707 00 05

                  MK

                  65,0

                  TR

                  81,4

                  ZZ

                  73,2

                  0709 93 10

                  TR

                  94,7

                  ZZ

                  94,7

                  0805 50 10

                  AR

                  123,5

                  BO

                  98,4

                  CL

                  153,3

                  NZ

                  145,2

                  TR

                  74,0

                  UY

                  114,6

                  ZA

                  133,9

                  ZZ

                  120,4

                  0806 10 10

                  BR

                  154,3

                  CL

                  81,7

                  EG

                  159,6

                  MA

                  154,4

                  TR

                  152,4

                  ZZ

                  140,5

                  0808 10 80

                  AR

                  93,9

                  BR

                  111,9

                  CL

                  115,4

                  NZ

                  130,3

                  US

                  159,4

                  ZA

                  116,6

                  ZZ

                  121,3

                  0808 30 90

                  AR

                  71,8

                  CL

                  81,4

                  NZ

                  177,1

                  ZA

                  90,3

                  ZZ

                  105,2

                  0809 10 00

                  MK

                  106,1

                  TR

                  240,9

                  XS

                  111,2

                  ZZ

                  152,7

                  0809 29 00

                  CA

                  664,5

                  TR

                  290,5

                  US

                  344,6

                  ZZ

                  433,2

                  0809 30

                  MK

                  72,6

                  TR

                  139,3

                  ZZ

                  106,0

                  0809 40 05

                  BA

                  55,3

                  MK

                  53,5

                  TR

                  141,2

                  ZZ

                  83,3

         (1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘ZZ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.