title: Council Recommendation of 12 July 2011 on the national reform programme 2011 of Austria and delivering a Council opinion on the updated stability programme of Austria, 2011-2014

text:
               16.7.2011

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               C 210/8

         COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
   of 12 July 2011
   on the national reform programme 2011 of Austria and delivering a Council opinion on the updated stability programme of Austria, 2011-2014
   2011/C 210/03
   THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
   Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 121(2) and 148(4) thereof,
   Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (1), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,
   Having regard to the recommendation of the European Commission,
   Having regard to the conclusions of the European Council,
   Having regard to the opinion of the Employment Committee,
   After consulting the Economic and Financial Committee,
   Whereas:

               (1)

               On 26 March 2010, the European Council agreed to the Commission's proposal to launch a new strategy for jobs and growth, Europe 2020, based on enhanced coordination of economic policies, which will focus on the key areas where action is needed to boost Europe's potential for sustainable growth and competitiveness.

               (2)

               On 13 July 2010, the Council adopted a recommendation on the broad guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and the Union (2010 to 2014) and, on 21 October 2010, adopted a decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (2), which together form the ‘integrated guidelines’. Member States were invited to take the integrated guidelines into account in their national economic and employment policies.

               (3)

               On 12 January 2011, the Commission adopted the first Annual Growth Survey, marking the start of a new cycle of economic governance in the EU and the first European semester of ex-ante and integrated policy coordination, which is anchored in the Europe 2020 strategy.

               (4)

               On 25 March 2011, the European Council endorsed the priorities for fiscal consolidation and structural reform (in line with the Council's conclusions of 15 February and 7 March 2011 and further to the Commission's Annual Growth Survey). It underscored the need to give priority to restoring sound budgets and fiscal sustainability, reducing unemployment through labour market reforms and making new efforts to enhance growth. It requested Member States to translate these priorities into concrete measures to be included in their stability or convergence programmes and national reform programmes.

               (5)

               On 25 March 2011, the European Council also invited the Member States participating in the Euro Plus Pact to present their commitments on time for their inclusion in their stability or convergence programmes and their national reform programmes.

               (6)

               On 27 April 2011, Austria submitted its 2011 stability programme update covering the period 2011-2014 and on 2 May 2011 its 2011 national reform programme. In order to take account of the interlinkages, the two programmes have been assessed at the same time.

               (7)

               The Austrian economy entered the crisis on sound fundamentals, without having suffered from any major imbalances or distortions in the period preceding it. In spite of that, the financial and economic crisis has pushed the economy into the deepest recession for decades. Overall, real GDP contracted by almost 4 % in 2009. As a result of the crisis, employment fell by about 1 % in 2009, lifting unemployment to 4,8 % (from 3,8 % a year earlier). The crisis halted the previous continuous growth of current account surplus. The economic and financial crisis took its toll on public finances. As a result of the adoption of the stimulus packages and automatic stabilisers operating fully, the general government deficit reached 4,1 % and 4,6 % of GDP in 2009 and 2010 respectively. Public debt went up to 69,6 % and 72,3 % of GDP in 2009 and 2010 respectively. Since most of the stimulus measures were of a permanent nature, there was a need for fiscal consolidation as soon as economic conditions had improved. A consolidation package, amounting to close to 1 % of GDP, has been adopted in the budget law for 2011. Since the third quarter of 2009, the economy has been steadily recovering from the crisis on the back of improved foreign demand and in particular of stronger economic activity in Germany. Overall, real GDP growth reached 2 % in 2010.

               (8)

               Based on the assessment of the updated stability programme pursuant to Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1466/97, the Council is of the opinion that the macroeconomic scenario underpinning the budgetary projections is plausible, and too favourable towards the end of the stability programme period. The main goal of the medium-term budgetary strategy, presented in the latest update of the stability programme, is to gradually reduce the general government deficit from 4,6 % of GDP in 2010 to 2,4 % of GDP in 2014, chiefly by expenditure restraint. There are mainly downside risks to these targets due to the fact that the measures to underpin the consolidation path at the subnational level are unspecified and the fact that savings from some of the measures adopted at the federal level will not materialise, e.g. gains from the anti-tax-fraud campaign, the predicted impact of which seems to be highly speculative. On the other hand, a positive risk factor is the multi-annual expenditure framework introduced for the federal government in 2009, which seems to have contributed to enhancing predictability of the budgetary process in the medium term, albeit only at the federal level. The stability programme stipulates that the debt-to-GDP ratio will grow from 72,3 % in 2010 to 75,5 % in 2013 before declining to 75,1 % in 2014. However, there are some risks attached to this projection, which relate to the growing debt of state-owned companies classified outside the government sector and potential further burden stemming from support measures to the banking sector. At the same time, however, the debt ratio might turn out lower, as it is probable that the banks which received the public support during the crisis will pay it back ahead of the schedule that is assumed in the stability programme.

               (9)

               According to the stability programme, the general government deficit is expected to fall below the 3 % reference value in 2013, which is in line with the deadline set by the Council. However, the annual average fiscal effort of 0,2 % of GDP envisaged by the stability programme in the period 2011-2013 is well below the 0,75 % of GDP effort that the Council invited Austria to provide. According to the Commission's latest assessment, the risks with regards to long-term sustainability of public finances appear to be medium.

               (10)

               While Austria has a developed National Stability Pact in place, further reforming the fiscal relations between various layers of government would bring in substantial savings, support fiscal consolidation and free up resources for growth-enhancing investment in areas such as R&D and education. It is widely acknowledged that current relations are complex: not only are revenues from most individual taxes shared among the different territorial levels in fixed proportions, but also decision-making in many areas is divided among various levels of authority. For a number of activities, revenue-raising and spending responsibilities do not reside within the same level of government. Notable examples of inefficiencies stemming from the current form of these fiscal relations are found in the health care and education sectors.

               (11)

               The average tax wedge in Austria is among the highest in the EU. Compared with other EU countries, the social security contributions of employees are very high. The reduction of unemployment insurance contributions of low-wage earners in 2008 and the income tax reform of 2009 helped reduce the labour tax burden, but could not prevent the tax wedge from increasing slightly for both low- and average-income earners as compared with the start of the last decade. This wedge has a negative impact on employment, in particular of low-paid and low-skilled workers.

               (12)

               The employment rate of older workers in Austria is still well below the EU average in spite of a sharp rise in the last decade. Early retirement schemes and disability pensions are still widely used. Altogether 72 % of all new pensions in 2010 were granted before the statutory retirement age was reached. Another factor contributing to the low employment rate of older workers is the still relatively low statutory retirement age for women (60). Given the demographic developments in Austria, raising the effective retirement age and improving the framework enabling older workers to stay longer in the labour market are important in the context both of ensuring sustainability of public finances and of boosting the labour supply, which is forecast to start shrinking from 2020 onwards.

               (13)

               The female employment rate in Austria is relatively high, associated with one of the highest rates of part-time work. Women's jobs are highly concentrated in low-wage employment. These patterns result in a gender pay gap of 25,4 % which is the second highest in the EU and one of the factors leading to a relatively high poverty risk for women. A reason for female part-time work is the uneven distribution between women and men of care obligations for children and the elderly and the lack of child care and long-term care services.

               (14)

               The education system is characterised by ‘early tracking’, whereby pupils have to decide at the age of 10 about their future education path with limited permeability between paths, and widespread half-day schooling. This can result in suboptimal educational outcomes for vulnerable youth, in particular those with a migrant background. Early choices predetermine to a large extent future education paths, making it more difficult to reach higher education levels at a later stage. A common school for all 10 to 14-year-olds would help increase equality of opportunities in the education system and help tackle school drop-out rates.

               (15)

               Competition in the services sector, in particular network services such as telecommunications, transport, utilities, as well as retail trade and professional services, is not sufficiently developed. Productivity growth has been sluggish and the market structure has not fostered purchasing power and consumer demand. Promoting competition through facilitating market entry, reducing the statutory regulation of professions and ensuring competitive pricing would expand consumer choice and affordability. Austria has accumulated lengthy delays in implementing the Services Directive; addressing these could contribute to unlocking growth. In particular the ‘horizontal law’, a federal law implementing the main principles of the Directive, is still pending.

               (16)

               Austria has made a number of commitments under the Euro Plus Pact. The commitments refer to the three of the four areas of the Pact. On the fiscal side, the measures address the need to raise the effective retirement age as well as control public expenditure more effectively at the various levels of government. For employment, the focus is on combating youth unemployment, and for competitiveness, on investing further in research and technical education, as well as on developing models for all-day schools. The initiatives presented under the Pact are in line with the national reform programme and are in compliance with the Federal Budgetary Framework Law and the stability programme. However, while the measures address some of the main socio-economic issues facing the country, there are outstanding challenges that could usefully have been covered in the commitments, including in the areas of fiscal policy, education, competition and innovation. The Euro Plus Pact commitments have been assessed and taken into account in the recommendations.

               (17)

               The Commission has assessed the stability programme and national reform programme, and the Euro Plus Pact commitments for Austria. It has taken into account not only their relevance for sustainable fiscal and socio-economic policy in Austria, but also their observance of EU rules and guidance, given the need to reinforce the overall economic governance of the EU by providing EU-level input into future national decisions. It considers that, given the favourable economic conditions, the fiscal consolidation effort should be stepped up, in particular in 2012, and that the fiscal relations between the various layers of government should be reformed further. Reducing the tax wedge, improving educational outcomes and combating gender segmentation would be beneficial to the dynamism of the labour market, while enhancing competition and fostering innovation would increase competitiveness.

               (18)

               In light of this assessment, also taking into account the Council Recommendation under Article 126(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union of 2 December 2009, the Council has examined the 2011 update of the stability programme of Austria and its opinion (3) is reflected in particular in its recommendations (1) and (2) below,

         HEREBY RECOMMENDS that Austria take action within the period 2011-2012 to:

               1.

               Accelerate the correction of the excessive deficit, which is planned mainly on the expenditure side, thus bringing the high public debt ratio on a downward path, taking advantage of the ongoing economic recovery, in order to ensure an average annual fiscal effort of 0,75 % of GDP over the period 2011-2013 in line with the Council recommendations under the EDP. To this end, adopt and implement the necessary measures, including at the subnational level. Specify measures as needed to ensure adequate progress towards the medium-term objective in line with the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) after correction of the excessive deficit.

               2.

               Take steps to further strengthen the national budgetary framework by aligning legislative, administrative, revenue-raising and spending responsibilities across the different levels of government, in particular in the area of health care.

               3.

               In consultation with the social partners and according to national practices, take steps to further limit access to the current early retirement scheme for people with long insurance periods and take steps to reduce the transition period for harmonisation of the statutory retirement age between men and women to ensure the sustainability and adequacy of the pension system. Apply strictly the conditions for access to the invalidity pension scheme.

               4.

               Take measures to enhance participation in the labour market, including the following: reduce, in a budgetary neutral way, the effective tax and social security burden on labour, especially for low- and medium-income earners; implement the National Action Plan on the equal treatment of women and men in the labour market, including improvements in the availability of care services and of all-day school places to increase the options for women to work full-time and in the high gender pay gap; take steps to improve educational outcomes and prevent school drop-out.

               5.

               Take further steps to foster competition, in particular in the services sectors, by relaxing barriers to entry, removing unjustified restrictions on some professions, as well as enhancing the powers of the competition authority. Accelerate the adoption of the outstanding ‘horizontal law’ implementing the Services Directive.

      Done at Brussels, 12 July 2011.

            For the Council

            The President

         J. VINCENT-ROSTOWSKI

      (1)  OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1.

      (2)  Maintained for 2011 by Council Decision 2011/308/EU of 19 May 2011 on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (OJ L 138, 26.5.2011, p. 56).

      (3)  Foreseen in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1466/97.


title: Council Recommendation of 14 May 2008 on the broad economic policy guidelines for the Member States and the Community (2008-2010)

text:
               27.5.2008

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               L 137/13

      COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

   of 14 May 2008
   on the broad economic policy guidelines for the Member States and the Community (2008-2010)
   (2008/390/EC)
   THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
   Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular to Article 99(2) thereof,
   Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission,
   Having regard to the discussion by the European Council on 13 and 14 March 2008,
   Whereas a Resolution on the recommendation from the Commission was adopted by the European Parliament,
   HEREBY RECOMMENDS:
   SECTION A
   MACROECONOMIC POLICIES FOR GROWTH AND JOBS
   A.1.   Macroeconomic policies creating the conditions for more growth and jobs
   Securing economic stability to raise employment and growth potential
   Sound macroeconomic policies and structural reforms on product, labour and capital markets are essential to support a well balanced economic growth and the full realisation of growth potential. Monetary policies can contribute by pursuing price stability and, without prejudice to this objective, by supporting other general economic policies with regard to growth and employment. For new Member States, it will be important that monetary and exchange rate policies contribute towards achieving convergence. Exchange rate regimes constitute an important part of the overall economic and monetary policy framework and should be orientated towards achieving real and sustainable nominal convergence. Participation in ERM II, at an appropriate stage after accession, should help those endeavours.
   Securing a sound budgetary position will allow the full and symmetric play of the automatic budgetary stabilisers over the cycle with a view to stabilising output around potential. For those Member States that have already achieved sound budgetary positions, the challenge is to retain that position. For the remaining Member States, it is vital to take all the necessary corrective measures to achieve their medium term budgetary objectives in particular if economic conditions improve, thus avoiding pro-cyclical policies and putting themselves in a position in which sufficient room for the full play of automatic stabilisers over the cycle is ensured prior to the next economic downturn. In particular, in accordance with the report on the SGP reform endorsed by the European Council on 22 March 2005, euro area and ERM II Member States that have not yet reached their medium-term budgetary objectives (MTOs) should achieve an annual adjustment in cyclically adjusted terms, net of one-offs and other temporary measures, of 0,5 % of GDP as a benchmark.
   For individual Member States the MTOs are differentiated according to the diversity of economic and budgetary positions and developments. In line with the 2005 SGP reform, the MTOs will be reviewed to better take into account the ageing-induced fiscal burden. Moreover, also in accordance with the 2005 reform, introducing or strengthening national fiscal rules and institutions, including monitoring mechanisms can usefully complement the Pact and support its objectives.
   An additional macroeconomic policy challenge for some Member States is to operate in an environment of fast catching up, which is to varying degrees accompanied by external deficits, rapid credit expansion and financial deepening. Fiscal restraint, effective financial supervision and promoting competitiveness are essential in order to contain external and internal imbalances. A cautious fiscal stance is an important way to keep external deficits within the range where sound external financing can be secured. In addition to contributing to sound budgetary positions, fiscal restraint can also limit the risk of surging domestic demand causing persistently higher inflation and the occurrence of macro-financial risks which could cause swings in real exchange rates and a protracted loss of competitiveness. Structural reforms and appropriate coordination of policies play an essential role in helping economies to withstand possible adverse developments in the global economy.

      Guideline 1. To secure economic stability for sustainable growth

               1.

               In line with the Stability and Growth Pact, Member States should respect their medium-term budgetary objectives. As long as this objective has not yet been achieved, they should take all the necessary corrective measures to achieve it. Member States should avoid pro-cyclical fiscal policies. Furthermore, it is necessary that those Member States having an excessive deficit take effective action in order to ensure a prompt correction of excessive deficits.

               2.

               Member States posting current account deficits that risk being unsustainable should work towards correcting them by implementing structural reforms, boosting external competitiveness and, where appropriate, contributing to their correction via fiscal policies. See also integrated guideline ‘To contribute to a dynamic and well-functioning EMU’ (No 6).

         To safeguard economic and fiscal sustainability as a basis for increased employment
   Without changes in policies and behavioural changes more widely, Europe’s ageing population poses risks to the long-term sustainability of the European Union economy from lower potential output growth per capita due to a reduction in the share of the working age population, and rising spending on pensions, social insurance, health and long-term care systems. If not addressed in a timely manner, these potential developments would lead to a substantial increase in the debt burden. As documented in the Commission’s Sustainability Report, several Member States are exposed to high sustainability risk, and a number of others to medium risk.
   Member States should address the economic implications of ageing, in line with the well established three pronged strategy for tackling the budgetary implications of ageing. This includes an appropriate combination of policies to achieve a satisfactory pace of debt reduction, including by attaining the MTOs, and to provide incentives to raise employment rates and labour supply, so as to offset the impact of future declines in the share of persons of working age, as well as reforms to pension and health care systems. It is also essential to modernise social protection systems so as to ensure that they are financially viable, provide incentives to the working age population to actively participate in the labour market, while at the same time supporting their goals in terms of access and adequacy. Improved interaction between social protection systems and labour markets can remove distortions and encourage the extension of working lives against a background of increased life expectancy. Health promotion policies, including preventive health care, could help to increase the share of life spent in good health and thus support the sustainability of health care systems.

      Guideline 2. To safeguard economic and fiscal sustainability as a basis for increased employment
   Member States should, in view of the projected costs of ageing populations:

               1.

               undertake a satisfactory pace of government debt reduction to strengthen public finances;

               2.

               reform and re-enforce pension, social insurance and health care systems to ensure that they are financially viable, socially adequate and accessible;

               3.

               take measures to increase labour market participation and labour supply especially amongst women, young and older workers, and promote a lifecycle approach to work in order to increase hours worked in the economy.

         See also integrated guideline ‘Promote a lifecycle approach to work’ (Nos 18, and 4, 19, 21).
   Promote a growth and employment-orientated and efficient allocation of resources
   Well-designed tax and expenditure systems that promote an efficient allocation of resources are a necessity for the public sector to make a full contribution towards growth and employment. This can be achieved by redirecting expenditure towards growth-enhancing categories such as Research and Development (R & D), physical infrastructure, environmentally friendly technologies, human capital and knowledge, without jeopardising the goals of economic stability and sustainability. Public resources have to be used in the most efficient and effective manner. Member States can help to control expenditure categories through adequate budgetary institutions and fiscal frameworks such as the use of expenditure rules and performance budgeting, which moves the focus away from spending towards actual achievements and by putting assessment mechanisms in place to ensure that individual reform measures and overall reform packages are well-designed. Key priorities for the EU economy are to ensure that tax structures and their interaction with benefit systems increase incentives to work and to invest, to promote higher growth through more employment and investment and to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of expenditure in order to improve the quality of public finances.

      Guideline 3. To promote a growth- and employment-orientated and efficient allocation of resources
   Member States should, without prejudice to guidelines on economic stability and sustainability, re-direct the composition of public expenditure towards growth-enhancing categories in line with the Lisbon strategy, adapt tax structures to strengthen growth potential, ensure that mechanisms are in place to assess the relationship between public spending and the achievement of policy objectives, and ensure the overall coherence of reform packages.
   See also integrated guideline ‘To encourage the sustainable use of resources and strengthen the synergies between environmental protection and growth’ (No 11).
   Ensure that wage developments contribute to growth and stability and complement structural reforms
   Wage developments can contribute to stable macroeconomic conditions and an employment friendly policy mix. This requires that real wage increases are in line with the underlying rate of productivity growth over the medium term and consistent with a rate of profitability that allows for productivity, capacity and employment-enhancing investment. This requires that temporary factors such as variation in productivity caused by cyclical factors or one off rises in the headline rate of inflation do not cause an unsustainable trend in wage growth and that wage developments reflect local labour market conditions. In countries with declining market shares, wage moderation together with reforms boosting productivity are necessary so as to ensure that unit labour costs adjust in order to restore competitiveness. These issues need to be taken into account in the continued dialogue and information exchange between monetary and fiscal authorities and the social partners via the Macroeconomic Dialogue.

      Guideline 4. To ensure that wage developments contribute to macroeconomic stability and growth and to increase adaptability, Member States should encourage the right framework conditions for wage-bargaining systems, while fully respecting the role of the social partners, with a view to promoting nominal wage and labour cost developments consistent with price stability and the trend in productivity over the medium term, taking into account differences across skills and local labour market conditions.
   See also integrated guideline ‘Ensure employment-friendly labour cost developments and wage-setting mechanisms’ (No 22).
   Promote coherent macroeconomic, structural and employment policies
   The role of sound macroeconomic policies is to provide conditions conducive to employment creation and growth. Structural reforms, consistent with sound fiscal positions in the short and medium term, are essential to increase productivity and employment in the medium-term, thus leading to the full realisation and strengthening of growth potential. They also contribute to fiscal sustainability, macroeconomic stability and resilience to shocks. At the same time, appropriate macroeconomic policies are key for reaping the full growth and employment benefits of structural reforms. A key feature of Member States’ overall economic strategy is to ensure that they have a consistent set of structural policies that support the macroeconomic framework and vice versa. In particular, market reforms and investment in human capital need to improve the overall adaptability and adjustment capacity of economies in response to changes in both cyclical economic conditions and longer-term trends such as globalisation and technology. In this regard, reform of tax and benefit systems are important in order to make work pay and minimise disincentives for labour market participation.

      Guideline 5. To promote greater coherence between macroeconomic, structural and employment policies
   Member States should pursue labour and product markets reforms that at the same time increase the growth potential and support the macroeconomic framework by increasing flexibility, factor mobility and adjustment capacity in labour and product markets in response to globalisation, technological advances, demand shift, and cyclical changes. In particular, Member States should: renew impetus in tax and benefit reforms to improve incentives and to make work pay; increase adaptability of labour markets combining employment flexibility and security and improve employability by investing in human capital.
   See also integrated guideline ‘Promote flexibility combined with employment security and reduce labour market segmentation, having due regard to the role of the social partners’ (No 21, No 19).
   A.2.   Ensuring a dynamic and well-functioning euro-area
   Since the creation of the euro-area almost 10 years ago four further countries joined the euro-area. The euro has helped to embed economic stability in euro-area countries, consequently providing euro-area countries with favourable financing conditions and mitigating the effects of external exchange rate fluctuations. Subdued growth performance in some parts of the euro-area and persistent divergences in growth and inflation between euro-area countries raise questions as to whether internal adjustment in the euro-area is working smoothly, suggesting that economic policies and governance structures may not yet have fully adjusted to draw the full benefit from the monetary union. Since euro-area countries can no longer make independent use of monetary or exchange rate policies, further structural reforms are key to foster smooth adjustment to economic shocks and regain competitiveness, thus firmly putting economic growth on a sustainable basis.
   The policy mix in the euro-area needs to support economic growth while safeguarding long-term sustainability and stability. At the current juncture, it is important that the policy mix underpins confidence among consumers and investors, which also implies commitment to medium-term stability. Budgetary policy has to ensure a fiscal position which can support price stability, and is consistent with the need to prepare for the impact of ageing populations on the one hand and to accomplish a composition of public expenditure and revenues that fosters economic growth on the other. In April 2007, the Eurogroup agreed that ‘taking advantage of the favourable cyclical conditions, most euro-area members would achieve their MTOs in 2008 or 2009 and all of them should aim for 2010 at the latest.’ Due to the high share of the public sector in economic activity in the euro-area, the quality of public finances has a considerable influence on economic performance. It is also crucial that resources are spent in an efficient and effective manner, with a view to enhancing growth potential, and to minimise the distortions arising from the financing of public activity. Comprehensive structural reforms will allow the euro-area to raise its growth potential over time and ensure that stronger growth does not build up potential for higher inflation. Reforms catering for more adaptable, inclusive and integrated labour markets, more competition on product markets and deeper financial market integration accompanied by growth and stability-oriented macroeconomic policies are particularly salient for euro-area Member States as they have an important impact on their capacity to adequately adjust to shocks.
   To contribute to international economic stability and better represent its economic interests, it is critical for the euro area to play its full role in international monetary and economic policy cooperation. While the appointment of a Eurogroup President for a two-year term of office as of 2005 has brought greater stability to the external representation of the euro-area, the external representation of the euro-area should be further improved in line with the existing agreements, so that the euro-area can take a leading strategic role in the development of the global economic system that is commensurate with its economic weight.
   Spill-over effects are most powerful and the need for a common agenda is strongest in the euro-area. Sharing a common currency and a common monetary policy offers an extra dimension to coordination that could strengthen the role of the euro-area in delivering growth and jobs for the whole EU.

      Guideline 6. To contribute to a dynamic and well-functioning EMU, euro-area Member States need to ensure better coordination of their economic and budgetary policies, in particular:

               1.

               pay particular attention to fiscal sustainability of their public finances in full compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact;

               2.

               contribute to a policy mix that supports economic recovery and is compatible with price stability, and thereby enhances confidence among business and consumers in the short run, while being compatible with long term sustainable growth;

               3.

               press forward with structural reforms that will increase euro-area long-term potential growth and will improve its productivity, competitiveness and economic adjustment to asymmetric shocks, paying particular attention to employment policies; and

               4.

               ensure that the euro-area’s influence in the global economic system is commensurate with its economic weight.

         SECTION B
   MICROECONOMIC REFORMS TO RAISE EUROPE’S GROWTH POTENTIAL
   Structural reforms are essential to increase the EU’s growth potential and support macroeconomic stability, because they increase the efficiency and adaptability of the European economy. Productivity gains are fuelled by competition, human capital, investment, innovation. Raising Europe’s growth potential requires making progress in both job creation and productivity growth. After lagging US productivity growth for more than a decade, productivity growth in the EU has accelerated since mid-2005, although productivity growth in several service sectors has stalled. Sustaining this improvement is a major challenge facing the Union, especially in the light of its ageing population. Population ageing alone is estimated to reduce by nearly half the current rate of potential growth. A continuation of the productivity upswing, better educated, skilled and motivated labour force and increasing the hours worked are thus indispensable to maintain and increase future living standards, and to ensure a high level of social protection. Moreover, greater cooperation between the different government levels will allow for more coherent, coordinated and effective policy making.
   B.1.   Knowledge and innovation — engines of sustainable growth
   Knowledge accumulated through investment in R & D, innovation, education, skills and life long learning, is a key driver of long-run growth. Policies aimed at increasing investment in knowledge and strengthening the innovation capacity of the EU economy are at the heart of the Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. This is why national and regional programmes for the period 2007-2013 have been increasingly targeted on investments in these fields in accordance with the Lisbon objectives.
   Increase and improve investment in R & D, with a view to establishing the European Knowledge Area
   A high level of R & D is a crucial input to the innovative process and therefore makes an important contribution to our future competitiveness. R & D affects economic growth through various channels: first, it can contribute to the creation of new markets or production processes; second, it can lead to incremental improvements in already existing products and production processes; third, it increases the capacity of a country to absorb new technologies; and fourth, it promotes the innovative potential. In achieving sustainable growth, environmental technologies and eco-innovation play an important role.
   The EU is currently spending about 1,85 % of GDP on R & D (although ranging from below 0,5 % to nearly 4 % of GDP across Member States). The level of R & D spending compared to GDP has slightly decreased since 2000. Moreover, only around 55 % of research spending in the EU is financed by the business sector. Low levels of private R & D investments are identified as one of the main explanations for the EU/US innovation gap. More rapid progress towards establishing the European Research Area, including meeting the collective EU target of raising research investment to 3 % of GDP by 2010 is needed. Member States are invited to report on their R & D expenditure targets and the measures to achieve these in their National Reform programmes and the annual Implementation Reports paying attention in particular to integrating the European dimension within their national R & D policies. The main challenge is to put in place framework conditions, instruments and incentives for companies to invest more in research.
   Public research expenditure must be made more effective and the links between public research and the private sector have to be improved. Poles and networks of excellence should be strengthened and modern research infrastructure developed in a coordinated way, better overall use should be made of public support mechanisms to boost private sector innovation, and a better leverage effect of public investments and a modernised management of research institutions and universities should be ensured. It is also essential to ensure that companies operate in a competitive environment since competition provides an important incentive to private spending on innovation. In addition, a determined effort must be made to increase the number and quality of researchers active in Europe, in particular by attracting more students into scientific, technical and engineering disciplines, enhancing the career development and reducing the barriers to international, European and inter-sectoral mobility of researchers, including the recruitment and re-integration of excellent expatriate and foreign researchers, and students. The European dimension of R & D should be strengthened in terms of joint financing, development of a critical mass of researchers and an optimal number of research infrastructures at the EU level in priority areas requiring large funds, and through reducing barriers to mobility of researchers, university teaching staff and students. To enhance the capacity of creating and adopting new knowledge, more efforts are required in improving and maintaining the quality of education, particularly of higher education.

      Guideline 7. To increase and improve investment in R & D, in particular by private business, the overall objective for 2010 of 3 % of GDP is confirmed with an adequate split between private and public investment, Member States will define specific intermediate levels. Member States should further develop a mix of measures appropriate to foster R & D, in particular business R & D, through:

               1.

               improved framework conditions and ensuring that companies operate in a sufficiently competitive and attractive environment;

               2.

               more effective and efficient public expenditure on R & D and developing PPPs;

               3.

               developing and strengthening centres of excellence of educational and research institutions in Member States, as well as creating new ones where appropriate, and improving the cooperation and transfer of technologies between public research institute and private enterprises;

               4.

               developing and making better use of incentives to leverage private R & D;

               5.

               modernising the management of research institutions and universities;

               6.

               ensuring a sufficient supply of qualified researchers by attracting more students into scientific, technical and engineering disciplines and enhancing the career development and the European, international as well as inter-sectoral mobility of researchers and development personnel.

         Facilitate innovation
   The dynamism of the European economy is dependent on its capacity for creativity and innovation. The economic framework conditions for innovation need to be in place. This implies well-functioning financial and product markets as well as efficient and affordable means to enforce intellectual property rights. Innovations are often introduced to the market by new enterprises, which may meet particular difficulties in obtaining finance. Measures to encourage the creation and growth of innovative enterprises, including improving access to finance, should therefore enhance innovative activity. Technology diffusion, and policies to better integrate national innovation and education systems, can be fostered by the development of innovation poles and networks as well as by innovation support services targeted at SMEs. Knowledge transfer via researcher mobility, foreign direct investment (FDI) or imported technology is particularly beneficial for lagging countries and regions. It is also crucial to strengthen further the integration of the knowledge triangle of R & D, education and innovation. In particular, high quality education and training systems are among the prerequisites for excellence and innovation.
   The EU’s broad based innovation strategy therefore addresses intellectual property rights, standardisation, the use of public procurement to stimulate innovation, joint technology initiatives, boosting innovation in lead markets, cooperation between higher education, research and business including open source-type innovation, encouraging innovation in regions, innovation in services and non-technological innovation, and improving businesses’ access to finance, especially to risk capital.
   It is necessary for the EU to find solutions for a patent litigation system and a Community patent.

      Guideline 8. To facilitate all forms of innovation, Member States should focus on:

               1.

               improvements in innovation support services, in particular for dissemination and technology transfer;

               2.

               the creation and development of innovation poles, networks and incubators bringing together universities, research institutions and enterprises, including at regional and local level, helping to bridge the technology gap between regions;

               3.

               the encouragement of cross-border knowledge transfer, including from foreign direct investment;

               4.

               encouraging public procurement of innovative products and services;

               5.

               better access to domestic and international finance;

               6.

               efficient and affordable means to enforce intellectual property rights.

         The diffusion of information and communication technologies (ICT), in line with the objectives and actions of the i2010 initiative, is also an important way to improve productivity and, consequently, economic growth. The EU has been unable to reap the full benefits of the Information and communication technologies (ICT), due especially to the continuing under-investment in ICT, organisational innovation and digital skills. Wider and more effective use of ICT and the establishment of a seamless Single Market in electronic communication services will bolster the future competitiveness of European businesses. It is also important to reduce and prevent fragmentation of the ‘e-Internal Market’ by putting in place interoperable e-services between the Member States in all segments. Open ICT standards are useful as a basis for interoperability and innovation. Security of networks, the security and privacy of information, as well as convergence should also be ensured. Member States should encourage the deployment of broadband networks, including for the poorly served regions, in order to develop the knowledge economy and reduce regional disparities in terms of economic, social and cultural development, and foster growth and innovation in new services by promoting the deployment of very high speed broadband networks.

      Guideline 9. To facilitate the spread and effective use of ICT and build a fully inclusive information society, Member States should:

               1.

               encourage the widespread use of ICT in public services, SMEs and households;

               2.

               fix the necessary framework for the related changes in the organisation of work in the economy;

               3.

               promote a strong European industrial presence in the key segments of ICT;

               4.

               encourage the development of strong ICT and content industries, and well-functioning markets;

               5.

               ensure the security of networks and information, as well as convergence and interoperability in order to establish an information area without frontiers;

               6.

               encourage the deployment of broad band networks including for the poorly served regions, in order to develop the knowledge economy See also integrated guideline ‘Promote flexibility combined with employment security and reduce labour market segmentation, having due regard to the role of the social partners’ (No 21).

         To strengthen the competitive advantages of the European industrial base
   A strong industrial base is of key importance for Europe’s economy. The competitiveness of the EU depends on the ability of the economy to reorient activities towards sectors with higher productivity. An approach where public policies are conducive to innovation, employment, and regional and other policies are well integrated, supports upgrading the EU industrial base. Furthermore, in order to enhance and sustain economic and technological leadership, Europe must increase its capacity to develop and market new technologies, including ICT and environmental technologies. The synergies from jointly addressing research, regulatory and financing challenges at the European level, where for reasons of scale or scope individual Member States cannot successfully tackle market failures in isolation, should be analysed and exploited. The EU has still not managed to fully realise its technological potential. European industrial policy should endeavour to create level playing field for business based on fair competition. The pooling of European excellence and the development of public-private partnerships and cooperation between Member States where the benefits for society are larger than those for the private sector will help tap this technological potential.

      Guideline 10. To strengthen the competitive advantages of its industrial base, Europe needs a solid industrial fabric throughout its territory. The necessary pursuit of a modern and active industrial policy means strengthening the competitive advantages of the industrial base, including by contributing to attractive framework conditions for both manufacturing and services, while ensuring the complementarity of the action at national, transnational and European level. Member States should:

               1.

               start by identifying the added value and competitiveness factors in key industrial sectors, and addressing the challenges of globalisation;

               2.

               also focus on the development of new technologies and markets:

                           (a)

                           this implies in particular commitment to promote new technological initiatives based on public private partnerships and cooperation between Member States, that help tackle genuine market failures;

                           (b)

                           this also implies the creation and development of networks of regional or local clusters across the EU with greater involvement of SMEs.

         See also integrated guideline ‘Improve matching of labour market needs’ (No 20).
   Encourage the sustainable use of resources
   Lasting success for the Union also depends on addressing a range of resource and environmental challenges which, if left unchecked or dealt with in a way which is not cost effective, will act as a brake on future growth. Recent developments have emphasised the importance of energy efficiency and reducing the vulnerability of the European economy to oil prices variations. An integrated approach to climate and energy policy is needed to increase the security of supply, ensure the competitiveness of the EU economy and the availability of affordable energy, and combat climate change. Member States and the Community must both contribute to achieving the EU targets of at least a 20 % reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, a 20 % share of renewable energies as well as a 20 % improvement in energy efficiency by 2020, as well as the preparation of a 30 % reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 as the EU’s contribution to a global and comprehensive agreement for the period beyond 2012, provided that other developed countries commit themselves to comparable emission reductions and economically more advanced developing countries to contributing adequately. Policies should be developed to ensure the targets are met in the most economically efficient way and on a least cost basis. A key challenge will be to ensure that the transition to a low-carbon economy is handled in a way that is consistent with EU competitiveness, supports sound and sustainable management of public finances and that contributes to broader growth objectives consistent with the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs. It is of vital importance that Member States continue the fight against climate change in order that the global temperature increase does not exceed 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, and implementing the Kyoto as well as the 2020 targets in a cost-effective way. Member States should halt the loss of biological diversity between now and 2010, and preserve ecosystem services, in particular by incorporating this requirement into other policies, given the importance of biodiversity for certain economic sectors.
   The development of an efficient and sustainable transport policy including by allowing an effective internalisation of external costs, is of crucial importance. The use of market-based instruments, so that prices better reflect environmental damage and social costs, plays a key role in this context, and it is important to let appropriate price signals play out fully. There should also be a strengthening of the EU emissions trading scheme. Promoting the development and use of environment-friendly technologies and eco-innovations, the greening of public procurement with particular attention to SMEs, and the removal of environmentally harmful subsidies alongside other policy instruments including taxation, environmental subsidies and charging can improve innovative performance and enhance the contribution to sustainable development. For example, EU companies are amongst the world leaders in developing new renewable energy technologies. In a context of continued upward pressure on energy prices, and accumulating threats to the climate, it is important to push energy efficiency improvements as a contribution to both growth and sustainable development.

      Guideline 11. To encourage the sustainable use of resources and strengthen the synergies between environmental protection and growth, Member States should:

               1.

               give priority to energy efficiency and co-generation, the development of sustainable, renewable, energies and the rapid spread of environmentally friendly and eco-efficient technologies, (a) inside the internal market on the one hand particularly in transport and energy, inter alia, in order to reduce the vulnerability of the European economy to oil price variations, and (b) towards the rest of the world on the other hand as a sector with a considerable export potential;

               2.

               promote the development of means of internalisation of external environmental costs and decoupling of economic growth from environmental degradations. The implementation of these priorities should be in line with existing Community legislation and with the actions and instruments proposed in the Environmental Technologies Action Plan (ETAP), inter alia, through: (a) the use of market based instruments, (b) risk funds and R & D funding, (c) the promotion of sustainable production and consumption patterns including the greening of public procurement, (d) paying particular attention to SMEs, and (e) a reform of subsidies that have considerable negative effects on the environment and are incompatible with sustainable development, with a view to eliminating them gradually;

               3.

               pursue the objective of halting the loss of biological diversity between now and 2010, in particular by incorporating this requirement into other policies, given the importance of biodiversity for certain economic sectors;

               4.

               continue to fight against climate change, while implementing the Kyoto targets in a cost-effective way, particularly in regard to SMEs.

         See also integrated guideline ‘To promote a growth- and employment-orientated and efficient allocation of resources’ (No 3).
   B.2.   Making Europe a more attractive place to invest and work
   The attractiveness of the European Union as an investment location depends, inter alia, on the size and openness of its markets, its regulatory environment, the quality of its labour force and its infrastructure.
   Extend and deepen the internal market
   Whilst the internal market for goods is relatively well integrated, services markets remain, legally or de facto, rather fragmented. The complete and timely implementation of the Services Directive will be a significant step towards a fully operational Internal Market for services. The elimination of all obstacles including through administrative burden reduction to cross-border activities will help unleash the untapped potential of the services sector in Europe. Improving the tax environment is important. The functioning of the Single Market may be improved through continuing efforts to tackle tax fraud, eliminate harmful tax competition and through strengthened cooperation on taxation between Member States and, where appropriate, at European level, while respecting national competences. Work in this area will continue, including addressing obstacles to the Internal Market. Finally, the full integration of financial markets by implementing the strategy set out in the White Paper on Financial Services 2005-2010 would raise output and employment by allowing more efficient allocation of capital and creating better conditions for business finance.
   Member States have made progress in the transposition of internal market directives. Nevertheless further improvement should remain a priority in order to reap the benefits of a Single European market. Furthermore, directives are often not implemented or applied correctly, as illustrated by the high number of infringement proceedings launched by the Commission. Member States should exchange best practice with each other and cooperate with the Commission to ensure that they deliver the full benefits of internal market legislation to their citizens and businesses. For example, there is considerable scope for further improvements in public procurement practices. Such improvements would be reflected in an increase in the share of public procurement publicly advertised. Moreover, more open procurement would lead to significant budgetary savings for the Member States.

      Guideline 12. To extend and deepen the internal market, Member States should:

               1.

               speed up the transposition of internal market directives;

               2.

               give priority to stricter and better enforcement of internal market legislation;

               3.

               eliminate remaining obstacles to cross-border activity;

               4.

               apply EU public procurement rules effectively;

               5.

               promote a fully operational internal market of services, while preserving the European social model;

               6.

               accelerate financial market integration by a consistent and coherent implementation and enforcement of the Financial Services Action Plan See also integrated guideline ‘To improve matching of labour market needs’ (No 20).

         Ensure open and competitive markets inside and outside Europe
   An open global trading system is of essential interest for the EU. As the world’s leading trader and investor, our openness allows lower cost inputs for industry, lower prices for consumers, a competitive stimulus for business, and new investment. At the same time, it is important for the EU to use its influence in international negotiations to press for increasingly open markets which should lead to reciprocal benefits. Therefore the EU remains committed to further breaking down barriers to trade and investment, and it will stand firm against unfair practices in trade, investment and distorted competition. It is also important to work with our key trading partners to create a common space of compatible regulatory provisions and standards, including cooperation at international level to enhance the efficiency and stability of international financial markets.
   Competition policy has played a key role in ensuring a level playing field for firms in the EU. It can also be beneficial to look at the wider regulatory framework around markets, in order to promote the conditions which allow firms to compete effectively, especially taking into account external aspects of competitiveness during the development and implementation of our own internal policies. A further opening of European markets to competition can be achieved by a reduction in the general level of remaining State aid. This movement must be accompanied by a redeployment of remaining State aid in favour of support for certain horizontal objectives. The review of State aid rules has facilitated this.
   Structural reforms that ease market entry are particularly effective for enhancing competition. These will be particularly important in markets that were previously sheltered from competition because of anticompetitive behaviour, the existence of monopolies, over-regulation (for example permits, licences, minimum capital requirements, legal barriers, shop opening hours, regulated prices, etc. may hinder the development of an effective competitive environment), or because of trade protection.
   In addition, the implementation of agreed measures to open up the network industries to competition (in the areas of electricity and gas, transport, telecommunications and postal services) should help ensure lower overall prices and greater choice whilst guaranteeing the delivery of services of general economic interest to all citizens. Competition and regulatory authorities should ensure competition in liberalised markets. The satisfactory delivery of high quality services of general economic interest at an affordable price must be guaranteed.
   Empowered consumers who make informed choices will more quickly reward efficient operators. Further efforts are needed to improve the enforcement of consumer legislation which both empowers consumers and opens up the internal market to more intense competition at retail level.
   External openness to trade and investment, by increasing both exports and imports, is an important spur to growth and employment and can reinforce structural reform. An open and strong system of global trade rules is of vital importance for the European economy. The successful completion of an ambitious and balanced agreement in the framework of the Doha-Round as well as the development of bilateral and regional free trade agreements, should further open up markets to trade and investment, thus contributing to raising potential growth. The EU stands ready to assist its trade and investment partners in fostering global standards and in particular to support capacity building in developing countries.

      Guideline 13. To ensure open and competitive markets inside and outside Europe and to reap the benefits of globalisation, Member States should give priority to:

               1.

               the removal of regulatory, trade and other barriers that unduly hinder competition;

               2.

               a more effective enforcement of competition policy;

               3.

               selective screening of markets and regulations by competition and regulatory authorities in order to identify and remove obstacles to competition and market entry;

               4.

               a reduction in State aid that distorts competition;

               5.

               in line with the Community Framework, a redeployment of aid in favour of support for certain horizontal objectives such as research, innovation and the optimisation of human capital and for well-identified market failures;

               6.

               the promotion of external openness, also in a multilateral context;

               7.

               full implementation of the agreed measures to open up the network industries to competition in order to ensure effective competition in European wide integrated markets. At the same time, the delivery, at affordable prices, of effective services of general economic interest has an important role to play in a competitive and dynamic economy.

         Improve European and national regulation
   Market regulation is essential to create an environment in which commercial transactions can take place at a competitive price. It also serves to correct market failures or to protect market participants. Nevertheless, the cumulative impact of legislation and regulation may impose substantial economic costs. It is therefore important that legislation is well-designed, proportionate and regularly reviewed. The quality of the European and national regulatory environments is a matter of joint commitment and shared responsibility at both the EU and Member State level.
   The better regulation culture has begun to take root in the EU. In the Commission’s approach to better regulation, the economic, social and environmental impacts of new or revised legislation are carefully assessed to identify the potential trade-offs and synergies between different policy objectives. Moreover, existing regulation is screened for simplification potential, including of administrative burdens, and its impact on competitiveness is assessed. Finally, the Commission has adopted an approach to measuring the administrative costs of new and existing EU legislation, and an ambitious target has been set to achieve a 25 % reduction in the burden arising from EU legislation and its national transposition by 2012.
   Member States should set equally ambitious national reduction targets within their spheres of competence. In order to decrease administrative burden, e-public services should be actively promoted and other ICT tools widely used by the Member States. More generally, Member States should adopt a comprehensive and explicit better regulation strategy, including appropriate institutional structures, monitoring tools and resources and involving appropriate stakeholders. Member States should systematically assess costs and benefits of legislative initiatives and revisions. They should improve the quality of regulation, while preserving their objectives, and simplify existing legislation. They should consult widely on the costs and benefits of regulatory initiatives; particularly where trade-offs between different policy objectives are implied. Member States should also ensure that appropriate alternatives to regulation are given full consideration. This is especially important for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which usually have only limited resources to deal with the regulatory requirements imposed by both Community and national legislation. Hence, special consideration should be given to whether SMEs could be exempted in total or in part from administrative requirements.

      Guideline 14. To create a more competitive business environment and encourage private initiative through better regulation, Member States should:

               1.

               reduce the administrative burden that bears upon enterprises, particularly on SMEs and startups;

               2.

               improve the quality of existing and new regulations, while preserving their objectives, through a systematic and rigorous assessment of their economic, social (including health) and environmental impacts, while considering and making progress in measurement of the administrative burden associated with regulation, as well as the impact on competitiveness, including in relation to enforcement;

               3.

               encourage enterprises in developing their corporate social responsibility.

         Europe needs to foster its entrepreneurial drive more effectively and it needs more firms willing to embark on creative or innovative ventures. Policies should create a framework for innovative SMEs that have the potential for high added value and high growth. Learning about entrepreneurship through all forms of education and training should be supported and relevant skills provided. The entrepreneurship dimension should be integrated in the life long learning process from school. Partnerships with companies should be encouraged. The creation and growth of businesses can be encouraged by improving conditions for access to finance, more efficient financial intermediation, and strengthening economic incentives. This can include adapting tax systems to reward success, reducing non-wage labour costs and reducing the administrative burdens for start-ups, notably through the provision of relevant business support services (especially for young entrepreneurs) and setting up of single contact points. Particular emphasis should be put on facilitating the transfer of ownership including of family businesses, and improving rescue and restructuring proceedings in particular with more efficient bankruptcy laws. Member States should also promote the diffusion of ICT to SMEs in order to improve productivity and to foster exportation by fostering online administrative procedures. Due regard is needed to the particular barriers experienced by women entrepreneurs and to identify and develop support to increase the number of women entrepreneurs. The proposals which will be part of the upcoming ‘Small Business Act’ for the EU to be presented by the Commission, should be designed so as to ensure they contribute to unlocking the growth and jobs potential of SMEs.

      Guideline 15. To promote a more entrepreneurial culture and create a supportive environment for SMEs, Member States should:

               1.

               improve access to finance, in order to favour their creation and growth, in particular micro-loans and other forms of risk capital;

               2.

               strengthen economic incentives, including by simplifying tax systems and reducing non-wage labour costs;

               3.

               strengthen the innovative potential of SMEs;

               4.

               provide relevant support services, like the creation of one-stop contact points and the stimulation of national support networks for enterprises, in order to favour their creation and growth in line with Small firms’ Charter. In addition, Member States should reinforce entrepreneurship education and training for SMEs. They should also facilitate the transfer of ownership, modernise where necessary their bankruptcy laws, and improve their rescue and restructuring proceedings.

         See also integrated guidelines ‘To promote a growth- and employment-orientated and efficient allocation of resources’ (No 3) and ‘To facilitate all forms of innovation’ (No 8, No 23 and No 24).
   Expand and improve European infrastructure
   Modern infrastructure (transport, energy and digital communication) is an important factor affecting the attractiveness of locations. It facilitates mobility of persons, goods and services throughout the Union. By reducing transport and communication costs and by widening markets, interconnected and interoperable trans-European networks help foster international trade and fuel internal market dynamics. Moreover, the ongoing liberalisation of European network industries fosters competition and drives efficiency gains in these sectors.
   In terms of future investment in European infrastructure, the implementation of 30 priority transport projects identified by Parliament and Council in the trans-European network (TEN) transport guidelines, as well as the completion of the quick-start cross-border projects for transport, renewable energy and broadband communications and research (identified under the European Initiative for Growth) and the implementation of the other transport projects, supported by the Cohesion Fund should be a priority. Infrastructure bottlenecks within countries also need to be tackled. Appropriate infrastructure pricing systems can contribute to the efficient use of infrastructure and the development of a sustainable modal balance.

      Guideline 16. To expand, improve and link up European infrastructure and complete priority cross-border projects with the particular aim of achieving a greater integration of national markets within the enlarged EU. Member States should:

               1.

               develop adequate conditions for resource-efficient transport, energy and ICT infrastructures, in priority, those included in the TEN networks, by complementing Community mechanisms, including in particular cross-border sections and peripheral regions, as an essential condition to achieving a successful opening up of the network industries to competition;

               2.

               consider the development of public-private partnerships;

               3.

               consider the case for appropriate infrastructure pricing systems to ensure the efficient use of infrastructure and the development of a sustainable modal balance, emphasising technology shift and innovation and taking due account of environmental costs and the impact on growth.

         See also integrated guideline ‘To facilitate the spread and effective use of ICT and build a fully inclusive information society’ (No 9).

      Done at Brussels, 14 May 2008.

            For the Council

            The President

         A. BAJUK