Avis juridique important

|

52002SC0381(01)

Recommendation from the Commission to the Council in order to authorise the Commission to open and conduct negotiations with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) on the conditions and arrangements for accession by the European Community  /* SEC/2002/0381 final */

RECOMMENDATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL in order to authorise the Commission to open and conduct negotiations with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) on the conditions and arrangements for accession by the European CommunityEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUMIntroductionThis communication from the Commission to the Council concerns the accession of the European Community to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO).It is necessary, as the White Paper on the future of the European transport policy [1] underlines, that the European Union, which is the world's leading commercial power and conducts a large part of its trade outside its own borders, play its role in the adoption of the international rules which govern much of transport.[1]  White Paper on "European transport policy for 2010: time to decide", COM(2001) 370 of 12.09.2001.The Community has built up a considerable body of law over the last ten years on air and sea transport. Therefore the increasing involvement of the Community in matters dealt with in the two organizations and the consequent development of the Community's internal rules make it necessary to strengthen Community participation in the ICAO and IMO, organizations with worldwide membership setting international rules concerning air and maritime transport. This will put the Community in a position to meet its obligations as regards external competences and to guarantee consistency between Community law and international law in these two sectors of particular economic importance.As ruled by the European Court of Justice back in 1971, as the Community develops common internal rules it also acquires authority over external negotiations which might affect these common rules (ERTA doctrine [2]). Later, in Opinion 1/76 the Court of Justice further declared that if the Community has an internal competence to achieve a specific objective, it implicitly holds the exclusive external competence on that subject as far as such an external exercise is necessary to achieve that objective [3].[2]  Case 22/70 of 31.03.1971, Commission v. Council, ECR 1971, page 263.[3]  Opinion 1/76 of 26.04.1977, Draft Agreement establishing a European laying-up fund for inland waterway vessels, ECR 1977, page 741.The Court's Opinion 1/94 [4] confirmed the rationale of these two judgements. It further stated that "Once the Community has included in its internal legislative acts provisions relating to the treatment of nationals of third countries or has expressly conferred upon its institutions a competence to negotiate with third countries, it acquires an exclusive competence on the measure covered by these acts. This is also the case, even in the absence of an explicit provision enabling its institutions to negotiate with third countries, when the Community has achieved a complete harmonisation (...) because the common rules so adopted could be affected in the sense of the ERTA judgement (...) if the Member States retained a freedom to negotiate with the third countries." [5][4]  Opinion 1/94 of 15.11.1994, Competence of the Community to conclude international agreements concerning services and the protection of intellectual property, ECR 1994, page I-5267.[5]  Opinion 1/94, paragraphs 95 and 96.Consequently, the Community has no other choice than to accede to the Chicago and Geneva Conventions, in order to meet its obligations arising both from secondary legislation and from the principles laid down in the case law of the ECJ.In addition to legal considerations, as the Commission stated in its recent White Paper on "European transport policy for 2010: time to decide" [6] "(...) the European Union, which is the world's leading commercial power and conducts a large part of its trade outside its own borders, has (...) little say in the adoption of the international rules which govern much of transport. This is because the Union as such is excluded from most intergovernmental organizations, where it has no more than observer status."[6]  COM(2001) 370 of 12.09.2001.The Commission has therefore taken the position that "...[this situation] needs to be remedied without delay, by having the Community accede to the inter-governmental organizations which govern transport so that the thirty-odd members of the enlarged Union not only speak with a single voice but, above all, can influence those organizations' activities in the common interest and in support of sustainable development."The potential impact of carefully coordinated Community action on the decisions taken in the ICAO and IMO has been already demonstrated under the existing, very limited possibilities for effective Community participation. In the field of maritime safety, the Community has agreed to ban single-hull tankers from its ports by 2015. This determination on the part of the European Union has led the IMO to change its planned timetable for phasing out such ships. The Community efforts to achieve a progressive reduction in aircraft noise have also helped speed up the multilateral discussions on the revision of aircraft noise standards in the ICAO.The problem and the way forwardExisting arrangements, however, for the participation of the Community as observer in the ICAO or the Commission in the IMO are neither satisfactory nor sufficient to guarantee effective representation of the Community position.In this regard, the fact that the Community can be invited to attend meetings of subsidiary bodies of the ICAO Council only as observer on an ad hoc basis and does not receive any information about the day-to-day activities of the ICAO Council and the Air Navigation Commission, the bodies where decisions are prepared and made during the 3-year intervals between meetings of the ICAO Assembly, raises a serious problem for the Community.Similarly, the Commission's observer status in the IMO does not permit it either to express itself in the name of the Community on matters of exclusive Community competence or to refer to decisions made at Community level, since any national position is considered only as such, regardless of the Community membership of the Member State expressing it. Under these circumstances the status of observer makes it difficult to reap the benefits of the coordination of positions, instead favouring the emergence of positions contrary to Community interests.A disparity is therefore obvious between the legitimate right of the European Community to exercise its powers in its own name and the status which the Community or the Commission is accorded in these two organizations.As the Chicago and Geneva Conventions setting up these two international organizations provide for only States to become members, accession of the Community requires amendment of the Conventions to allow regional economic integration organizations to become a member. Thus, before the Community can accede, proposals for amendment of both the Chicago Convention and the Geneva Convention will have to be submitted, approved by a two-thirds majority of the relevant organization's Assembly and ratified in accordance with the provisions of the relevant Convention [7].[7]  In the case of IMO, by two-thirds of contracting States; in the case of ICAO, by the number of contracting States specified by the Assembly, the number so specified having to be not less than two-thirds of the total number of contracting States.To this end the Commission recommends to the Council to authorise it to negotiate the necessary amendments of the Conventions.However, as the Community will not be in a position to accede to either organization until the necessary number of States which are members of the organization have ratified the amendment of the relevant Convention, this process can be expected to take a considerable time.Transitional arrangementsTaking this into account, transitional arrangements are proposed, to be established once the Commission has been given authorisation to negotiate amendment of the Conventions. The objective is to strengthen working relations between the EC and the ICAO/IMO, based on consideration of the need and conditions for fuller participation in the work of these organizations.Because of differences in the rules and functioning of the two international organizations, the present possibilities for EC participation in their work differ considerably.For example, the European Commission has permanent observer status at the IMO and is therefore authorised to receive all documents and to participate as it sees fit, whereas the Community has non-permanent observer status at the ICAO and may participate at meetings only when invited [8], having access only to documents connected with such meetings, the legal restriction being greater in relation to the ICAO than the IMO. One practical result of this is that the Commission coordinates the position of the Member States for IMO meetings, whereas in the case of the ICAO the Community may not attend meetings of ICAO bodies which make binding decisions.[8]  The existing internal ICAO rules do not provide for the status of permanent observer.In view of these differences, the two parts of this communication relating to the ICAO and the IMO respectively place a different emphasis on such intermediate steps and make recommendations in this regard adapted to the needs and possibilities of the respective situation.In the case of the ICAO, due, on the one hand, to the weakness of the present status of the Community in view of the working methods of the organization, and, on the other, to the distance from its headquarters, the Commission will put in place, in parallel with the accession negotiations, more effective methods of representation by designating a permanent representative on the spot (as is the case with the states which are members of the ICAO Council). In addition, appropriate internal Community procedures are required, adapted to the real situation of ICAO work.In the case of the IMO, where coordination takes place but does not allow the Community to speak with a single voice, the Member States should undertake concerted action within the IMO committees, with a view to permitting the Presidency or the Commission, depending on which holds the powers, to express the position of the Community. The process of full participation is likely to take considerable time. Throughout this process it will be important to maintain close relations with other IMO Contracting Parties and representatives of industry. Therefore, a permanent representative of the Commission at the IMO should also be envisaged.ConclusionsThe Commission invites the Council:- to authorise the Commission to negotiate in the name of the Community the necessary amendments to the Chicago and Geneva Conventions to allow it to become a member and appropriate arrangements for the transitional period; and- to adopt appropriate internal Community procedures for effective participation in the work of the organizations.RECOMMENDATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL in order to authorise the Commission to open and conduct negotiations with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) on the conditions and arrangements for accession by the European Community1. IntroductionCommunity involvement in matters dealt with in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), including the adoption of internal Community rules, has been increasing over the years, creating a need to strengthen Community participation in the ICAO in order to ensure that the action taken within the ICAO is in conformity with the Community's obligations and to guarantee the consistency of the Community position.To this end the Commission considers, as stated with particular emphasis as regards air transport in its recent White Paper "European transport policy for 2010: time to decide" [9], that the present situation where the Community has little say in the adoption of the international rules which govern the sector because it is excluded from the ICAO, where it has no more than observer status, needs to be remedied without delay, by having the Community accede to the organization. This is the only way to ensure that Community interests are fully safeguarded and properly pursued in the work of the ICAO on adoption of international rules governing air transport.[9]  COM(2001) 370 of 12.09.2001.However, this will require amendment of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, as this now provides for only states to be members, a process requiring approval by two thirds of the votes in the Assembly and ratification by the states which are members of the ICAO. This process will take time, so in the mean time it is necessary, as a transitional step, to improve internal Community procedures for coordination of positions in the ICAO and strengthen working relations between the EC and the ICAO. This communication considers the need and conditions for fuller participation in ICAO work.Consequently, the Commission recommends to the Council:- to authorise the Commission to open and conduct negotiations with the ICAO on the conditions and arrangements for accession of the European Community to the ICAO;- to authorise the Commission to negotiate with the ICAO, as an interim measure, the status of permanent observer for the Community.- to appoint a special committee to assist the Commission in this task;- to adopt the proposed negotiating directives.The Commission further recommends to the Council to invite the Member States to act in support of these objectives.2. Community competence and common interest in matters dealt with in the ICAOThe International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is a specialised agency of the United Nations responsible for establishing international standards, recommended practices and procedures covering the technical, economic and legal aspects of international civil aviation [10].[10]  The aims and objectives of ICAO, and details on the structure of the organization and the function of ICAO bodies are set out in Annex II.In addition to matters of long-established Community competence (e.g. customs) and to the general Community responsibilities for the functioning of the air transport market, Community involvement with matters dealt with in the ICAO, such as protection of the environment, market access, computer reservation systems, air traffic management, satellite navigation, air transport safety and security, has been increasing over the years and the adoption of Community legislation in these areas [11] has brought the relevant subjects within the Community's competence, in accordance with the relevant case law of the European Court of Justice [12].[11]  See list of relevant Community legislation in Annex I.[12]  Commission v. Council, Case 22/70 (ERTA) [1971] ECR 263;In the negotiating directives for the accession of the Community to Eurocontrol [13], the Council already admitted extensive Community competence in connection with matters listed in the Appendix thereto, namely:[13]  Council doc. 10208/98 AVIATION 38 dated 15.07.1998- air traffic management, insofar as the application of Community legal acts concerning standardisation, research and development, and trans-European transport networks affects air traffic management and related equipment;- activities of Eurocontrol that may have implications for Member States' public procurement practices; and- aviation traffic rights, insofar as the exercise of operational rules may have a direct effect on traffic rights or the establishment of route charging principles may discriminate among Community carriers.Furthermore, the Community recently acceded to the Montreal Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air [14].[14]  Done at Montreal on 28 May 1999.Increasingly, the need is being felt to ensure consistency between international rules established by the ICAO and Community rules, but also the need to avoid decisions in the ICAO preempting the possibilities of the Community.The outcome of ICAO work ranges from the formulation of policy statements (recommendations and resolutions) to the adoption of instruments, such as standards, which can become legally binding. In this respect, the following types of activity, with their potential consequences as regards the Community, can be distinguished:- The establishment of technical standards which, once adopted, are binding on the Member States [15] and could affect the functioning of the internal market. The main example is the preparation of environmental standards and the future GNSS [16] standards.[15]  States may, nevertheless, file "differences" during the adoption process.[16]  Global Navigation Satellite System.- The definition of operational and technical rules and guidelines for the provision of transport services, stop-over services, airport services and air navigation services. This is an area where the Community has already adopted rules and may have an interest in adopting more. In such areas the ICAO and the Community can develop cooperation and support the development of safe and orderly air transport. Examples are computer reservation systems, slot allocation or custom facilitation.- The definition of political orientations by the adoption of Assembly resolutions concerning air transport with regard to, for example, the environment, safety or air traffic management. These political orientations may be converted into standards and recommended practices. It is important that such resolutions and standards be in line with and support Community objectives.- The development of an international cooperation strategy based on geographical and financing priorities. Such activities could conflict with the common external policy. One example is the establishment of an International Financial Facility for Aviation Safety which could affect the EC assistance programmes and the role of existing financial institutions.The necessary international standardisation has been achieved primarily through the creation of Annexes to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (commonly known as "the Chicago Convention"). The main parts of each Annex are International Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs). At present there are eighteen Annexes to the Convention, covering the technical fields of aviation: licensing of personnel, rules of the air, aeronautical meteorology, aeronautical charts, units of measurement, operation of aircraft, nationality and registration marks, airworthiness, aeronautical telecommunications, air traffic services, search and rescue, aircraft accident investigation, aerodromes, aeronautical information services, aircraft noise and engine missions, security and the safe transport of dangerous goods.Thus, ICAO work involves, inter alia, development of rules that could affect existing Community rules and policies and, unless the Community effectively participates in such work, there is the further risk of eventual adoption of international rules which might not be in the interest of the Community as a whole.3. Community accession3.1. Status of the European Community and participation of the Commission in ICAO workFollowing a Commission communication to the Council concerning relations with the ICAO in March 1988 [17], on 12 April 1988 the Commission addressed a request to the ICAO to establish relations between the ICAO and the European Community "that permit the latter to benefit from a permanent invitation to the meetings of the ICAO and to participate in them as observer".[17]  SEC(88) 341.In February 1989, following an exchange of letters on this request, the ICAO Council decided to include the Commission "in the list of the organizations which may be invited to participate in the appropriate meetings of ICAO".Since then, the Community, represented by the Commission, has held the status of (non-permanent) observer and has been on the list of the international organizations which may be invited, each time by decision of the ICAO Council, to attend meetings [18].[18]  Note that the ICAO Council referred to participation by the Commission. For its part, the Commission has consistently referred to participation by the Community, represented by the Commission, and, in the accreditation letters presented to the ICAO, to "the delegation of the European Community".When invited to participate in an ICAO meeting on behalf of the Community, the Commission, in accordance with the procedure agreed by COREPER on 11 November 1988 [19], has to inform this Committee and obtain its agreement for participation at the meeting in question.[19]  COREPER on "Request for participation, as observer, of the Community in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)".This very cumbersome procedure, solely for authorising Commission officials to participate at a meeting, was warranted at the time by the fact that the Community's fields of activity on air transport matters were very limited and it was considered that the Commission should not engage in unlimited participation in ICAO activities. At present, and in the light of developments in the mean time and Community competence, this procedure is no longer appropriate and has lost any justification it may have had at the time when it was established.Details on the status of the Community and participation of the Commission in ICAO work are provided in Annex III.The present status of the Community, with the consequent limitations on the representation of the Community's interests in the ICAO - as detailed in Section 4 below - is plainly inadequate.3.2. The need for Community membershipThe development of the Community's internal rules in a wide range of areas concerning air transport, as indicated in the previous section, makes it necessary to strengthen Community participation in the ICAO in order to put the Community in a position to meet its obligations in respect of its external competence and to guarantee the consistency of the Community position.Thus, in its recent White Paper on "European transport policy for 2010: time to decide" [20] the Commission took the position that the present situation "needs to be remedied without delay, by having the Community accede to the inter-governmental organizations which govern transport so that the thirty-odd members of the enlarged Union not only speak with a single voice but, above all, can influence those organizations' activities in the common interest and in support of sustainable development." It further emphasised that "the need for Europe to speak with a single voice in defence of its industrial and environmental interests is particularly urgent in the field of air transport."[20]  COM(2001) 370 of 12.09.2001.The Commission considers, indeed, that the only way to ensure that EC interests are fully safeguarded and properly pursued in the ICAO is by admission of the EC as a full participant, i.e. by accession to the Chicago Convention. Less than full participation, but with an improved status, such as that of permanent observer, would certainly constitute a significant improvement compared to the present, very unsatisfactory, situation while not depriving the Member States of their position in the organization and of their right to vote; it would remain inadequate, however, in terms of permitting the pursuit of EC interests in all cases under favourable conditions, as envisaged in the Treaty.3.3. Application for accessionThe Commission therefore considers that negotiations with the ICAO should be opened with a view to the European Community becoming a party to the Chicago Convention. As the Chicago Convention provides for only states to become members, accession by the EC requires amendment of the Convention in order to allow regional economic integration organizations to become a member [21].[21]  The relevant provisions of the Chicago Convention are contained in Chapters VIII (The Assembly) and XXI (Ratifications, adherences, amendments and denunciations); they are reproduced in Annex IV.To achieve this, a proposal for amendment of the Chicago Convention has to be submitted to the ICAO Assembly [22] in order to insert in the Convention a provision along the lines of Article 53 of the Montreal Convention [23]. Such amendment will require approval with two thirds of the votes in the Assembly and ratification "by the number of contracting States specified by the Assembly. The number so specified shall not be less than two-thirds of the total number of contracting States." [24][22]  In accordance with Article 49 of the Chicago Convention on "powers and duties of the Assembly".[23]  Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, done at Montreal on 28 May 1999. This implies that only certain provisions will be applicable to regional economic integration organizations. Indeed Article 53 of the Montreal Convention clearly sets out which provisions of the Convention will be applied to such organizations.[24]  Article 94 of the Chicago Convention.Such amendment of the Convention is a prerequisite for accession by the Community. The amendment does not automatically mean that the Community becomes a party to the amended Convention.The Commission would need to be authorised by the Council to negotiate such an amendment. The Council would also need to approve the internal Community rules for the establishment of the positions and the arrangements for participation by the Commission as representative of the Community.The successive steps necessary for accession are as follows:- The Council authorises the Commission to negotiate the conditions and the arrangements for the accession of the European Community to the ICAO, by amendment of the Chicago Convention opening membership to regional economic integration organizations along the lines of Article 53 of the Montreal Convention.- The Community submits to the competent ICAO bodies a request for the necessary amendments to allow a regional economic integration organization to become a party.- The amendments "shall then come into force in respect of States which have ratified such amendments when ratified by the number of contracting States specified by the Assembly. The number so specified shall not be less than two-thirds of the total number of contracting States."- The Commission adopts a proposal for a Council decision on the accession of the European Community to the ICAO and submits it to the Council.- The Council Decision allows the Community to accede to the ICAO by addressing a notification to the Government of the USA (Article 92 of the Chicago Convention).- The Community accession takes effect in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Chicago Convention, as amended.This process of accession of the Community will take time, making it necessary in the mean time, as a first step, to strengthen working relations between the EC and the ICAO.4. Initiatives to strengthen Community participation during the transition period4.1. Existing limitations on participation in meetingsThe fact that the Community cannot participate in meetings of the ICAO Council and the Air Navigation Commission (ANC) and does not receive any information about their day-to-day activities, but can only be invited to attend meetings of subsidiary bodies as observer on an ad hoc basis, raises a serious problem for the Community as regards its participation in ICAO work. Indeed, it is at the ICAO Council and the ANC where decisions are prepared and made [25] during the 3-year intervals between meetings of the Assembly. The Council, for example, may launch the procedure for the adoption of a standard impacting the functioning of the internal market and the Member States may file diverging differences without any transparency for the Community.[25]  The ICAO Council is empowered to make decisions which are binding on ICAO Contracting States; the Air Navigation Commission (ANC) has similarly effective decision-making powers. The work of the organization during the 3-year periods between successive Assembly sessions is carried out under the authority of the Council which, though of limited membership, is empowered to make decisions which are binding on the Contracting States. The Council, responsible to the Assembly, is empowered to make decisions, such as to adopt Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPS), which are binding on the Contracting States unless they file a difference. It holds regularly 3 sessions per year, each lasting for about 2 months. The schedule of Council and Committee meetings makes necessary the virtually permanent presence of Council members' representatives in Montreal. The ANC, the principal body concerned with the preparation of International Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) and Procedures for Air Navigation Services (PANS), has similarly effective decision-making powers in the technical field, although the Council has the responsibility for their final adoption. Details of the structure of the organization and the function of ICAO bodies are provided in Annex I.Coordination of positions in these matters is made more difficult by the fact that the working papers for the Council and the ANC become available only days before the meetings and are not available for observers. It is necessary that these limitations be overcome.4.2. Coordination of Community positionsAs the ICAO deals largely with matters of Community competence or common interest, prior coordination between the Commission and the Member States on such matters is necessary. Council Decision 80/50/EEC of 20 December 1979 [26] provides for a procedure for consultations on air transport questions dealt with in international organizations.[26]  OJ L 18, 24.1.1980, p. 24.A number of problems arise, however, in connection with the coordination of positions; they relate to (i) availability of information, (ii) organization of the coordination, and (iii) adoption and presentation of the common position. Due to these problems, discussed below, Council Decision 80/50/EEC is no longer sufficient for coordination of positions in the ICAO, which requires timely access to information, rules and procedures well adapted to the way ICAO bodies work and representation of the Community interest in the decision-making bodies.4.2.1. Access to informationIt is essential for the Commission to receive in advance all relevant information in order to act so as to avoid unnecessary friction, as well as to ensure, as far as possible, the consistency of Commission initiatives with those of the ICAO.It should be noted in this connection that distribution of ICAO documents is limited, so that the Commission does not regularly receive documentation and, in any case, does not receive documentation for Council and ANC meetings. To receive this documentation, and particularly to receive it in good time, is a prerequisite for being in a position to initiate consultations with the Member States and to coordinate positions. Through better use of the Internet, with ICAO Secretariat authorisation, some improvement in the situation has been achieved, but the situation is still not satisfactory.4.2.2. Organization of the coordinationAs all the Member States of the European Community are also members of the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) [27], a degree of coordination of positions takes place within that organization, in particular in the preparations of an Assembly. However, as experience at the ICAO Assembly has shown, the level of coordination in the Community is necessarily more substantial than in the ECAC where the interests are more diverging and no binding legislation exists.[27]  ECAC is a consultative inter-governmental organization seeking, mainly, to harmonize civil aviation policies and practices amongst its Member States. It was founded in 1955 and has at present a membership of 37 European States, including all Member States of the EU. Directors-General for Civil Aviation meet at regular intervals (normally twice a year) and the day-to-day work is managed by a Coordinating Committee. ECAC is served by its own Secretariat, under the direction of its Executive Secretary.The provisions of Council Decision 80/50/EEC [28] on the exchange of information and consultations are outdated in relation to the new institutional rules and practices. An appropriate mechanism for such coordination is required, without undermining ECAC's special relations with the ICAO.[28]  OJ L 18, 24.1.1980, p. 24.4.2.3. Adoption and presentation of positionsAssuming that the relevant information is available, the question is then how to define and express a common position:(i) The definition and presentation of a common position in the environment field in the last two sessions of the Assembly [29] is relevant in this regard. The position was defined in the Council and presented on behalf of the Community and its Member States by the Presidency. Participation in proceedings on the spot made it possible to follow negotiation of the resolutions. But, since the documentation for the Assembly meetings reaches contracting states and observers 3 months prior to the meeting, appropriate procedures have to be set up to coordinate the position.[29]  Commission report on the 32nd session of the Assembly (September-October 1998), COM(1998) 677 final, 25.11.1998.(ii) The situation is totally different for measures adopted by the Council and the ANC. Indeed, because of the extremely short (often as short as 24-hour) deadlines after relevant documents become available, given the short intervals between meetings of the ICAO Council during its sessions and similarly for the ANC, it is not possible to coordinate positions except on the spot. This requires the presence of the Commission and rules for coordination and adoption of common positions, which are adapted to the way ICAO bodies work.(iii) When it comes to meetings of panels and study groups, coordination is much more difficult because, contrary to Assembly and Conferences, the Commission is not always informed and because the members are invited on an ad hoc basis and not as representatives of their administration. But their activities are under the guidance of the Council and a "light" form of Community coordination would be in the Community interest to avoid conflicts with the ICAO's work.(iv) Finally, the ICAO regularly consults its members on amendments to SARPs [30] and other matters, through "State letters". Again, the Member States react in an uncoordinated way and, since the Community is not represented, the Commission receives no information and is placed before a fait accompli. These difficulties explain why the Commission has never, so far, tried to present a common position. In the case of the NOx standard, to take an example, a SARP was adopted while a proposal was pending before the Council, putting the Community before a fait accompli.[30]  Standards and Recommended Practices.In summary, depending on the availability of the information (which needs to be improved) the Community has the possibility, in view of the ICAO rules, to build and present a common position in the Assembly for the approval of policy decisions but has, at present, no possibility in practice to follow the implementation of these policy decisions in the Council, the ANC, panels, study groups and through State letters, because of lack of representation of the Community interest in the decision-making bodies.4.3 Need and conditions for improved participation in ICAO workThe need to improve EC participation in ICAO work is being felt increasingly, and is bound to be felt even more in future with the increased involvement of the Community in subjects dealt with by the organization. Appropriate steps therefore have to be taken to meet this need.The arrangements for cooperation to date, based on the 1988 exchange of letters between the President of the Commission and the President of the ICAO Council [31], as well as the internal Community procedure established at that time whereby the Commission obtains the agreement of COREPER each time it considers it appropriate to participate in a meeting, need to be adapted to present needs and realities taking into account the increasing link between the responsibilities of the Community and those of the ICAO. Appropriate rules for the coordination of positions, adapted to the real situation of ICAO work, are also required.[31]  See Annex III.The effective participation of the Community in ICAO work involves four elements: (1) appropriate internal Community procedures; (2) access to information; (3) the status of the Community; and (4) arrangements for representation.4.3.1 Internal Community proceduresAs regards internal Community procedures, relations with the ICAO should operate in the same manner as in the case of other international organizations. This means that there is no longer a need for the Commission to inform COREPER and obtain its assent to participate at ICAO meetings. This change will not affect the normal procedures for the preparation of the Community position or a coordinated position.The coordination of positions in the specific circumstances of ICAO work can be effectively organised on the spot, as required, by a permanent representative of the Commission stationed in Montreal (see Section 4.3.4 below).As to the presentation of positions, the Community position on matters of Community competence should be presented by the representative of the Commission with the support of the Presidency. The common position on matters of shared competence should be presented by the Presidency or the Commission. Member States may also speak in support of the common position. A common position on other matters of common interest should be presented by the representative of the Presidency. The Commission and Member States may speak in support of the common position.4.3.2. Access to informationThe effective participation of the Community in ICAO work requires resolution of the problem of (timely) access to all relevant ICAO documents. This is indispensable as it is a prerequisite for putting the Commission in a position to take initiatives when appropriate or necessary.The situation in this regard has recently improved to a certain extent: the ICAO has initiated wider use of the Internet to make an increasing number of documents accessible in this manner to authorised users, and the Commission has been provided with a code number permitting access to a range of documents.It remains to be seen, however, whether such access to information can be extended to the information circulating within the ICAO Council or the Air Navigation Commission. If not, access to this information would depend on the Member States, and in particular the Presidency, and should be addressed in the decision which the Commission invites the Council to adopt (Section 6 below).4.3.3. Permanent observer statusThe position of the Community as observer in the ICAO should be strengthened: the Community should no longer be treated on the same footing as any other international organization, but instead be accepted as a permanent observer [32]. This is the case with a multitude of international organizations, including organizations of the United Nations family, where the Community has an observer status (International Telecommunications Union, UNCTAD, UN Commission on International Trade Law, UN Environment Programme, UNESCO, World Food Programme, World Health Organization, World Intellectual Property Organization, etc.).[32]  In this connection, any ambiguity as to the fact that the Commission represents the Community should be cleared (see Section 3.1 and Annex III).Permanent observer status would permit regular participation in the work of the ICAO bodies and thereby greatly improve both the Community's standing and its material possibilities in terms of active participation in ICAO work, as a result of being automatically informed and invited in good time.In conclusion, the Commission recommends to the Council of Ministers to authorise it to negotiate with the ICAO the status of permanent observer and to decide on appropriate action by the Member States vis-à-vis the ICAO [33] in support of the request made by the Commission (Section 6 below).[33]  As ICAO policy concerning its relations with international organizations rests on a resolution of the Assembly, granting the Community a permanent observer status would possibly depend on a decision of the Assembly rather than a decision of the Council. 4.3.4. Representation at ICAO headquartersIn view of the working methods of the organization [34], and also because of the distance from its headquarters, effective participation in ICAO work requires more effective methods of representation in the form of designation of a permanent representative on the spot (as is the case with the states which are members of the ICAO Council).[34]  See Annex II.5. ConclusionsThe Community has to become a member of the ICAO and to this effect the appropriate steps for amendment of the Chicago Convention need to be taken.As the accession process will take time, in the mean time there is a need to improve the participation and presence of the Community in the ICAO work and to align it on the practices in other international organizations. This improvement will not affect the weight and voices of the EU Member States in the ICAO. It is not expected to produce a negative or reluctant reaction from the third countries, first because regional coordination exists already (ECAC) and will only be strengthened with the Community and, second, because the EU integration is already perceived by the ICAO as a reality.The Member States of the European Community will have to explain these developments to the third countries in the ICAO.6. RecommendationsIn view of the foregoing, the Commission recommends to the Council: to authorise the Commission to open and conduct negotiations with the ICAO on the conditions and arrangements for accession of the European Community to the Chicago Convention and, as an interim measure, on the status of permanent observer for the Community in the ICAO; to appoint a special committee to assist the Commission in this task; and to adopt the negotiating directives included in the Recommendation below.(a) The negotiating directives included in the Recommendation below have been drafted with a view to achieving the overall aim of allowing the Community to become a member of the ICAO.This status should allow the Community, in matters of its competence and on an equal footing with States which are members of the ICAO, to:(i) express its views during negotiations, or at any meeting of the bodies,(ii) for matters that have to be decided through a vote, have a voting weight equivalent to that of those of its Member States represented in the relevant ICAO body and bound by Community legislation from which external competence arises,(iii) express consent in its own name to assume the rights and obligations stemming from the instruments concluded in the framework of the ICAO.In accordance with Article 300 of the EC Treaty, the negotiations should be conducted by the Commission in consultation with a special committee appointed by the Council. In their role as current members of the ICAO, the Member States should provide all possible support for the accession of the Community to the Chicago Convention.As regards budgetary issues, in view of the fact that the financial contributions from the Member States of the European Union represent a part of the ICAO budget, it is not considered appropriate to envisage an additional financial contribution from the Community. As a fallback position, however, the Community could envisage a solution based on that adopted for Community accession to FAO, i.e. contributing a sum to cover administrative and other expenses arising out of its membership in the Chicago Convention (provided this sum is in no case fixed unilaterally by the ICAO, but in agreement with the Community).During negotiations, the question of the most appropriate place for including the arrangements for Community accession and participation might be raised. The ICAO might prefer to include some of them in the rules of procedure. For reasons of stability of the arrangements allowing its participation, the Community should prima facie have an interest in including them in the Convention. Nevertheless, it is also important to leave substantial room for manoeuvre on this point, in order to accommodate possible practical constraints on the ICAO side.Finally, the ICAO will presumably wish to allow Community participation through the inclusion of a general provision referring to the participation of regional economic integration organizations, and not only of the Community. In that case, it could be useful for the Community to suggest to the ICAO use of a definition along the lines of that incorporated in the Statute of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Once the Chicago Convention has been amended, and in the light of the results obtained, the Commission will present a proposal for a Council decision on the accession of the European Community.(b) The Council should authorise the Commission to negotiate with the ICAO, as an interim measure, the status of permanent observer for the Community. The Member States should take action vis-à-vis the ICAO in support of any such request. During the interim period, common positions should be presented in the ICAO, as indicated in Section 4.3.1 above.RECOMMENDATIONIn the light of the above, the Commission recommends:- that the letter in Attachment 1 be addressed to the Secretary-General of the ICAO informing the ICAO of the Community's wish to open negotiations with a view to allowing the accession of the European Community to the Convention on International Civil Aviation ("Chicago Convention");- that the Council authorise the Commission to negotiate with the ICAO the conditions and arrangements for the accession of the European Community to the Chicago Convention;- that the Council authorise the Commission to negotiate with ICAO, as an interim measure, the status of permanent observer;- that, since, in accordance with the Treaty, the Commission will conduct these negotiations on behalf of the European Community, the Council appoint a special committee to assist it in this task, and- that the Council issue the attached negotiating directives.ANNEX : NEGOTIATING DIRECTIVESAttachment 1Proposal for a letter to be addressed to the Secretary-General of the ICAO Sir,We have the honour to inform you that the European Community wishes to become a full member of the ICAO.The European Community has competence to adopt measures in the field of the ICAO. As a matter of fact, this competence has already been exercised through the adoption of a number of instruments in areas where the ICAO has carried or is currently carrying out work.As a result of this, the Community as such is increasingly concerned by the work of the ICAO. This has in turn raised the issue of Community accession to the ICAO. In this respect, the European Community believes that its accession to the ICAO would be advantageous not only for itself, but also for the ICAO. Indeed, facilitating the rights and obligations stemming both from ICAO membership and accession to instruments in areas where the Community is competent should also facilitate the progress and results of the work of the ICAO.The Chicago Convention does not, however, allow for membership of regional economic integration organizations. Therefore, we would like to ask you to open negotiations with a view to making the changes to the Convention and other internal rules that are necessary for allowing the Community to become a member of the ICAO, as well as on the conditions and arrangements for our membership.The Commission, assisted by a special committee of Member States, will be in charge of these negotiations from the Community side. The Commission is at the ICAO's disposal to meet its representatives at an early date, as the ICAO deems appropriate.Let us finally assure you that, as we have also expressed, the Community remains committed to ensuring that the ICAO remain an attractive forum for all countries in the world.For the CommissionThe PresidentFor the Council of the European UnionThe PresidentAttachment 2Negotiating directives- The Community should be granted full member status on equal footing with States.- The status should allow Community participation at negotiations and meetings on equal footing with States.- As to voting rights, the Community should have a number of votes equivalent to those of Member States represented in the relevant ICAO body and bound by the Community instruments from which external competence arises.- The Community shall make no financial contribution to the ICAO budget. Should this prove impossible to achieve, or were it to compromise acceptance of Community membership by current members of the ICAO, the Community could accept as a fallback position making available a sum compensating for the administrative and other expenses arising out of its membership of the ICAO. This sum should not be determined unilaterally by the ICAO, but in agreement with the Community.- As a full member, the Community should be entitled to accede to all future instruments negotiated in the context of the ICAO which fall under its competence.- The Commission should aim at the arrangements concerning the participation of the Community being included in the most appropriate place in the ICAO internal rules in order to guarantee their stability. However, the need for stability of such arrangements will be weighed against possible ICAO internal constraints.- During negotiations, and if necessary, the Commission will propose a definition of regional economic integration organization along the lines of that contained in Article II of the Statute of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [35].[35]  "... a regional economic integration organization must be one constituted by sovereign States, a majority of which are Member Nations of the Organization, and to which its Member States have transferred competence over a range of matters within the purview of the Organization, including the authority to make decisions binding on its Member States in respect of those matters".ANNEX IDerived Community legislation in areas dealt with in the ICAOMarket operationCouncil Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 83, 27.03.1999, p. 1)Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports (OJ L 14, 22.01.1993)Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 of 23 July 1992 on licensing of air carriers (OJ L 240, 24.08.1992, p. 1)Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (OJ L 240, 24.08.1992, p. 8)Council Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92 of 23 July 1992 on fares and rates for air services (OJ L 240, 28.08.1992)Council Regulation (EEC) No 2299/89 of 24 July 1989 on a code of conduct for computerized reservation systems (OJ L 220, 29.07.1989, p. 1)Amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3089/93 of 29 October 1993 (OJ L 278, 11.11.1993, p. 1) and Council Regulation (EC) No 323/1999 of 8 February 1999 (OJ L 40, 13.02.1999, p. 1)Council Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87 of 14 December 1987 laying down the procedures for the application of the rules on competition to undertakings in the air transport sector (OJ L 374, 31.12.1987)Amended by Council Regulations (EEC) No 1284/91 of 14 May 1991 (OJ L 122, 17.05.1991) and 2410/92 of 23 July 1992 (OJ L 240, 24.08.1992)Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 on access to the groundhandling market at Community airports (OJ L 272, 25.10.1996)Air traffic managementAgreement between the European Community, the European Space Agency and the European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation on a European contribution to the development of a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) (OJ L 194, 10.07.1998, p. 16)Adopted by: Council Decision 98/434/EC of 18 June 1998 (OJ L 194, 10.07.1998, p. 15)Council Directive 93/65/EEC of 19 July 1993 on the definition and use of compatible technical specifications for the procurement of air-traffic-management equipment and systems (OJ L 187, 29.07.1993, p. 52)Amended by Commission Directive 97/15/EC of 25 March 1997 (OJ L 95, 10.04.1997, p. 16) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2082/2000 of 6 September 2000 (OJ L 254, 09.10.2000) adopting Eurocontrol standardsAir safetyCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 of 16 December 1991 on the harmonization of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation (OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4)Amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1069/1999 of 25 May 1999 (OJ L 130, 26.05.1999, p. 16) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2871/2000 of 28 December 2000 (OJ L 333, 29.12.2000, p. 47)Council Directive 94/56/EC of 21 November 1994 establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of civil aviation accidents and incidents (OJ L 319, 12.12.1994, p. 14)EnvironmentCouncil Directive 92/14/EEC of 2 March 1992 on the limitation of the operation of aeroplanes covered by Part II, Chapter 2, Volume 1 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, second edition (1988) (OJ L 76, 23.03.1992, p. 21)Amended by Council Directive 98/20/EC of 30 March 1998 (OJ L 107, 07.04.1998, p. 4), Commission Directive 1999/28/EC of 21 April 1999 (OJ L 118, 06.05.1999, p. 53) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 991/2001 of 21 May 2001 (OJ L 138, 22.05.2001, p. 12)Council Directive 80/51/EEC of 20 December 1979 on the limitation of noise emissions from subsonic aircraft (OJ L 18, 24.01.1980, p. 26)Amended by Council Directive 83/206/EEC of 21 April 1983 (OJ L 117, 04.05.1983, p. 15)Council Directive 89/629/EEC of 4 December 1989 on the limitation of noise emission from civil subsonic jet aeroplanes (OJ L 363, 13.12.1989, p. 27)Council Regulation (EC) No 925/1999 of 29 April 1999 on the registration and operation within the Community of certain types of civil subsonic jet aeroplanes which have been modified and recertificated as meeting the standards of volume I, Part II, Chapter 3 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, third edition (July 1993) (OJ L 115, 04.05.1999, p. 1)Air carrier liability and passenger protectionCouncil Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 of 9 October 1997 on air carrier liability in the event of accidents (OJ L 285, 17.10.1997, p. 1)Council Decision 2001/539/EC of 5 April 2001 on the conclusion by the European Community of the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (the Montreal Convention) (OJ L 194, 18.07.2001, p. 38)Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ L 95, 21.04.1993)Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours (OJ L 158, 23.06.1990)Working conditionsCouncil Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time (OJ L 307, 13.12.1993, p. 18), as amended by Directive 200/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000 (OJ L 195, 01.08.2000, p. 41)Council Directive 2000/79/EC of 27 November 2000 concerning the European Agreement on the Organization of Working Time of Mobile Workers in Civil Aviation concluded by the Association of European Airlines (AEA), the European Transport Workers' Federation (ETF), the European Cockpit Association (ECA), the European Regions Airline Association (ERA) and the International Air Carrier Association (IACA) (OJ L 302, 01.12.2000, p. 57)OtherCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 of 4 February 1991 establishing common rules for a denied-boarding compensation system in scheduled air transport (OJ L 36, 08.02.1991)Council Directive 91/670/EEC of 16 December 1991 on mutual acceptance of personnel licences for the exercise of functions in civil aviation (OJ L 373, 31.12.1991).ANNEX IIThe International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)ICAO was founded through the Convention on International Civil Aviation of 1944 (commonly known as "the Chicago Convention") and has a worldwide membership of 185 states, including all the EC Member States. It has its headquarters in Montreal and seven regional offices, among them a European office in Paris.The aims and objectives of ICAO, set out in the Chicago Convention [36], are to develop the principles and techniques of international air navigation and to foster the planning and development of international air transport so as to: (a) ensure the safe and orderly growth of international civil aviation throughout the world; (b) encourage the arts of aircraft design and operation for peaceful purposes; (c) encourage the development of airways, airports, and air navigation facilities for international civil aviation; (d) meet the needs of the peoples of the world for safe, regular, efficient and economical air transport; (e) prevent economic waste caused by unreasonable competition; (f) ensure that the rights of Contracting States are fully respected and that every Contracting State has a fair opportunity to operate international airlines; (g) avoid discrimination between Contracting States; (h) promote safety of flight in international air navigation; (i) promote generally the development of all aspects of international civil aeronautics.[36]  Article 44 of the Chicago Convention.1. Structure of the International Civil Aviation Organization and function of its bodiesThe bodies set up by the Chicago Convention are the Assembly, the Council, the Air Navigation Commission (ANC) and the Secretariat.The Assembly is composed of the representatives of all Contracting States. It normally meets every 3 years to examine in detail the Organization's activities, to draw up policies for the following years, and to adopt budgets.The Council is elected by the Assembly for a 3-year term, composed of 33 members [37], among which 6 are EC Member States (France, Germany, Ireland [38], Italy, Spain, United Kingdom). The Council members are chosen so as to give a balanced representation to three categories of states: those of major importance in air transport; those making the largest contribution to the provision of facilities for civil air navigation; and those whose designation assures the representation of every major geographic area in the world.[37]  In October 1990 the Assembly adopted an amendment to the Convention raising the number of Council Members to 36. This amendment is not yet in force.[38]  On behalf also of Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Austria. Furthermore, Denmark, Sweden and Finland are represented by Norway.The ICAO Council is empowered to make decisions which are binding on the Contracting States. It has several auxiliary Committees, inter alia the Air Transport Committee (ATC), the Joint Support Committee (JSC), the Legal Committee (LC), the Finance Committee (FC), the Committee on Unlawful Interference (UIC) and the Technical Cooperation Committee (TCC).The Council holds regularly 3 sessions per year, each lasting for about 2 months. The schedule of Council and Committee meetings makes necessary the virtually permanent presence of Council members' representatives in Montreal.In addition to the Assembly and the Council, an Air Navigation Commission (ANC) was set up by the Chicago Convention itself.The ANC is composed of fifteen persons who have "suitable qualifications and experience in the science and practice of aeronautics", nominated by Contracting States and appointed by the Council. The members of this Commission act independently. This Commission reports to the Council and is responsible for the examination, coordination and planning of the ICAO's technical work programme in the air navigation field. On specialised problems requiring up-to-date and specialised expertise, the Commission is assisted by panels - small groups of experts, acting in their personal expert capacity, although nominated by Contracting States and international organizations and approved by the Commission.The ANC is the principal body concerned with the development of International Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs), and Procedures for Air Navigation Services (PANS), enjoying effective decision-making powers, although the Council has the responsibility for their final adoption [39].[39]  Specifications proposed to be given the status of Standards or Recommended Practices are, after consultation with all Contracting States and interested international organizations, finalized by the ANC and submitted to the Council where they require a two-thirds majority for adoption. Following their adoption and provided a majority of Contracting States do not disapprove them before the established effective date, the SARPs become applicable at dates set by the Council. These Standards and Recommended Practices are considered binding. However, if any Contracting State finds it impossible to comply with them, the State is required to inform ICAO of any differences that will exist on the applicability of the amendment.The Secretariat provides technical and administrative assistance to the governmental representatives making up the Council. It is headed by a Secretary-General appointed by the Council.2. Relations with other international organizationsICAO works in collaboration with other Specialised Agencies of the UN such as the WMO, ITU, UPU, WHO, IMO and UNDP.Several Non-Governmental Organizations also participate in ICAO activities as observers: IATA, International Federation of the Pilots' Associations and International Association of Aircraft Owners and Pilots.Regional organizations (and among them the European Community) can also be invited to attend as observers at meetings of ICAO bodies, as is usually the case. Furthermore, invitations are extended on an ad hoc basis and, generally, following a request indicating the grounds justifying it. However, no invitations are extended to ad hoc observers to meetings of the Council or the Air Navigation Commission. Coupled with the fact that relevant documentation is not regularly available, this raises serious difficulties, in particular as regards meetings of the Council and the Air Navigation Commission.ANNEX IIIStatus of the EC and participation of the Commission in ICAO workFollowing a Commission communication to the Council concerning relations with the ICAO (SEC(88) 341, March 1988), on 12 April 1988 Mr Delors, then President of the European Commission, addressed a request to Mr Kotaite, President of ICAO, initiated by the former's request on 12 April 1988, to establish relations between ICAO and the European Community "that permit the latter to benefit from a permanent invitation to the meetings of the ICAO and to participate in them as observer".On 28 February 1989, following an exchange of letters on this request, Mr Kotaite informed Mr Delors that the ICAO Council had decided to include the Commission "in the list of the organizations which may be invited to participate in the appropriate meetings of ICAO".As explained, however, by Mr Kotaite, ICAO does not acknowledge the status of permanent observer [40]: ... under a resolution adopted by the Assembly, the ICAO's policy has always been to keep its relations with other international organizations highly flexible and on an unofficial footing. In this context, no "permanent observer" status exists within the ICAO. The ICAO Council decides which observers will be invited to each meeting.[40]  IATA appears, though, to be (for all intents and purposes, at least) a permanent observer.The Community, represented by the Commission, has since held the status of (non-permanent) observer and is on the list of the international organizations which may be invited to attend meetings [41]. It can thus be invited to attend meetings open to regional organizations:[41]  It is noted that the ICAO Council decision referred to participation of the Commission. On its part, the Commission has consistently referred to the participation of the Community, represented by the Commission and, in the Accreditation Letters presented to ICAO, to "the delegation of the European Community". - it is regularly invited to the meetings of the Assembly;- it is invited upon request to meetings of Committees in which it has an interest;- it is also invited upon request to meetings of expert groups (CAEP, GNSS).However, so far it has not participated in meetings of the ICAO Council or the ANC.When invited to participate at an ICAO meeting on behalf of the Community the Commission, in accordance with the procedure agreed by COREPER on 11 November 1988 [42], has to inform the Committee - under "other business" - and obtain the Committee's agreement for the participation of the Community in the meeting in question.[42]  "The participation of the Community, in a capacity of observer, in the meetings of the ICAO will be with the agreement of the Council on the proposal of the Commission" (cf. doc. 9310/88 EXT 1 CRS/CRP 38 AER 28)This procedure is a gentlemen's agreement whereby the Commission is assured, informally and in advance of its participation at a meeting, that COREPER has no objection. This is an exceptional procedure, as the Commission participates in a multitude of meetings of international organizations, including organizations of the United Nations family, where the Community has an observer status (International Telecommunications Union, UNCTAD, UN Commission on International Trade Law, UN Environment Programme, UNESCO, World Food Programme, World Health Organization, World Intellectual Property Organization, etc.) without any intervention of the Council.The procedure agreed in 1988, solely for authorising Commission officials to participate at a meeting, was warranted at the time by the fact that the Community's fields of activity on air transport matters were very limited and it was considered that the Commission should not engage in unlimited participation in ICAO activities. At present, and in the light of developments since then, it appears as an oddity which has lost any justification it may have had at the time when it was established.ANNEX IVRelevant provisions of the Chicago ConventionCHAPTER VIIITHE ASSEMBLYArticle 48Meetings of Assembly and votinga) The Assembly shall meet not less than once in three years and shall be convened by the Council at a suitable time and place. An extraordinary meeting of the Assembly may be held at any time upon the call of the Council or at the request of not less than one-fifth of the total number of contracting States addressed to the Secretary General.b) All contracting States shall have an equal right to be represented at the meetings of the Assembly and each contracting State shall be entitled to one vote. Delegates representing contracting States may be assisted by technical advisers who may participate in the meetings but shall have no vote.c) A majority of the contracting States is required to constitute a quorum for the meetings of the Assembly. Unless otherwise provided in this Convention, decisions of the Assembly shall be taken by a majority of the votes cast.Article 49Powers and duties of AssemblyThe powers and duties of the Assembly shall be to:.......................j) Consider proposals for the modification or amendment of the provisions of this Convention and, if it approves of the proposals, recommend them to the contracting States in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XXI;......................CHAPTER XXIRATIFICATIONS, ADHERENCES, AMENDMENTS, AND DENUNCIATIONSArticle 91Ratification of Conventiona) This Convention shall be subject to ratification by the signatory States. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America, which shall give notice of the date of the deposit to each of the signatory and adhering States. b) As soon as this Convention has been ratified or adhered to by twenty-six States it shall come into force between them on the thirtieth day after deposit of the twenty-sixth instrument. It shall come into force for each State ratifying thereafter on the thirtieth day after the deposit of its instrument of ratification.c) It shall be the duty of the Government of the United States of America to notify the government of each of the signatory and adhering States of the date on which this Convention comes into force.Article 92Adherence to Conventiona) This Convention shall be open for adherence by members of the United Nations and States associated with them, and States which remained neutral during the present world conflict.b) Adherence shall be effected by a notification addressed to the Government of the United States of America and shall take effect as from the thirtieth day from the receipt of the notification by the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all the contracting States.Article 93Admission of other StatesStates other than those provided for in Articles 91 and 92 a) may, subject to approval by any general international organization set up by the nations of the world to preserve peace, be admitted to participation in this Convention by means of a four-fifths vote of the Assembly and on such conditions as the Assembly may prescribe: provided that in each case the assent of any State invaded or attacked during the present war by the State seeking admission shall be necessary.Article 94Amendment of Conventiona) Any proposed amendment to this Convention must be approved by a two-thirds vote of the Assembly and shall then come into force in respect of States which have ratified such amendment when ratified by the number of contracting States specified by the Assembly. The number so specified shall not be less than two-thirds of the total number of contracting States.b) ............FINANCIAL STATEMENTPolicy area(s): Air TransportActivity(ies): Participation in ICAO Title of action: Representation to ICAO1. BUDGET LINE(S) + HEADING(S): Part A, title 62. OVERALL FIGURES2.1 Total allocation for action (Part B): EUR million for commitment : none2.2 Period of application: Starting in 2003, indefinite duration2.3 Overall multiannual estimate on expenditure:a) Schedule of commitment appropriations/payment appropriations (financial intervention) (see point 6.1.1) EUR million (to 3rd decimal place)>TABLE POSITION>b) Technical and administrative assistance and support expenditure (see point 6.1.2)>TABLE POSITION>>TABLE POSITION>c) Overall financial impact of human resources and other administrative expenditure (see points 7.2 and 7.3) >TABLE POSITION>>TABLE POSITION>2.4 Compatibility with the financial programming and the financial perspective| | Proposal compatible with the existing financial programming|X| This proposal will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the financial perspective| | This may entail application of the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement. 2.5 Financial impact on revenue:|X| No financial implications OR| | Financial impact - the effect on revenue is as follows:3. BUDGET CHARACTERISTICS>TABLE POSITION>4. LEGAL BASIS: Article 302 (ex Article 229)5. DESCRIPTION AND GROUNDS5.1 Need for Community intervention 5.1.1 Objectives pursued The increasing involvement of the Community in matters dealt with in the ICAO and the consequent development of Community internal rules makes it necessary to strengthen Community participation in this organization, which sets international rules concerning air transport. This will put the Community in a position to meet its obligations as regards external competence and to guarantee the consistency of the Community position in this sector of particular economic importance.Thus, in its recent White Paper on "European transport policy for 2010: time to decide" the Commission took the position that the present situation needs to be remedied without delay, by having the Community accede to ICAO, "so that the thirty-odd members of the enlarged Union not only speak with a single voice but, above all, can influence those organizations' activities in the common interest and in support of sustainable development."Existing arrangements for the participation of the Community as observer in ICAO work are neither satisfactory nor sufficient to guarantee the effective representation of the Community position. As the Chicago Convention setting up the organization provides for membership by states only, accession of the Community requires amendment of the Convention to allow regional economic integration organizations to become members. Thus, before the Community can accede, a proposal for amendment of the Chicago Convention has to be submitted, approved by the organization's Assembly, and ratified. To this end, the Commission recommends to the Council to authorise it to negotiate the necessary amendment of the Convention.However, as the Community will not be in a position to accede to the ICAO until the necessary number of States which are members of the organization have ratified the amendment of the Convention, this process can be expected to take a considerable time. Taking this into account, transitional arrangements are proposed, to be established once the Commission has been given authorisation to negotiate amendment of the Convention in order to strengthen working relations between the EC and ICAO, based on consideration of the need and conditions for improved participation in its work. Due, on the one hand, to the weakness of the present status of the Community in view of the methods of work of the organization, and also because of the distance from its headquarters, the Commission will put in place, in parallel with the negotiations on accession, more effective methods of representation by establishing an office and designating a permanent representative in Montreal.5.1.2 Measures taken in connection with ex ante evaluation  Not applicable5.1.3 Measures taken following ex post evaluation Not applicable5.2 Actions envisaged and arrangements for budget intervention- the target population(s) (specify number of beneficiaries if possible);Not applicable- the specific objectives set for the programming period (in measurable terms);Establishment of representative office in Montreal- the concrete measures to be taken to implement the action;Negotiations- the immediate outputs of each action, and their contribution toNot applicable- the expected outcomes solving needs or problemsNot applicableInformation should also be given on the arrangements for budget intervention (rate and form of the required financial assistance): 100 %The establishment of a representative office in Montreal will require budget resources for the establishment of an external service.5.3 Methods of implementationThe Commission office will need regular staff (one official) and a local agent (secretary).6. FINANCIAL IMPACT6.1 Total financial impact on Part B - (over the entire programming period)6.1.1 Financial intervention: None6.1.2 Technical and administrative assistance, support expenditure and IT expenditure (Commitment appropriations) None6.2 Calculation of costs by measure envisaged in Part B (over the entire programming period)Commitments in EUR million (to the 3rd decimal place)>TABLE POSITION>7. IMPACT ON STAFF AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE 7.1 Impact on human resources>TABLE POSITION>7.2 Overall financial impact of human resources>TABLE POSITION>The amounts are total expenditure for twelve months.* An additional amount of EUR37 000 is foreseen for first installation.7.3 Other administrative expenditure deriving from the action>TABLE POSITION>The amounts are total expenditure for twelve months.The needs for human and administrative resources shall be covered within the allocation granted to the managing DG in the framework of the annual allocation procedure.I. Annual total (7.2 + 7.3): EUR308 000 II. Duration of action: indefiniteIII. Total cost of action (I x II): n.a.  //  An additional amount of EUR37 000 for first installation.8. FOLLOW-UP AND EVALUATION8.1 Follow-up arrangementsNot applicable8.2 Arrangements and schedule for the planned evaluationNot applicable9. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURESNot applicable


				|

		52012DC0316

			Recommendation for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on Ireland’s 2012 national reform programme and delivering a Council opinion on Ireland’s stability programme for 2012-2015 /* COM/2012/0316 final */

			   	Recommendation for a
COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
on Ireland’s 2012 national reform
programme
and delivering a Council opinion on Ireland’s stability programme for 2012-2015
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 121(2) and 148(4)
thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary
positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies[1], and in particular Article 5(2)
thereof,
Having regard to the recommendation of the
European Commission[2],
Having regard to the resolutions of the
European Parliament,[3]
Having regard to the conclusions of the
European Council,
Having regard to the opinion of the
Employment Committee,
After consulting the Economic and Financial
Committee,
Whereas:
(1)       On 26 March 2010, the
European Council agreed to the European Commission’s proposal to launch a new
strategy for jobs and growth, Europe 2020, based on enhanced coordination of
economic policies, which will focus on the key areas where action is needed to
boost Europe’s potential for sustainable growth and competitiveness.
(2)       On 13 July 2010, the
Council adopted a recommendation on the broad guidelines for the economic
policies of the Member States and the Union (2010 to 2014) and, on 21 October
2010, adopted a decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the
Member States[4],
which together form the ‘integrated guidelines’. Member States were invited to
take the integrated guidelines into account in their national economic and
employment policies.
(3)       On 12 July 2011, the
Council adopted a recommendation on Ireland’s national reform programme for 2011
and delivered a Council opinion on Ireland’s updated stability programme for
2011-2014.
(4)       On 23 November 2011, the
Commission adopted the second Annual Growth Survey, marking the start of the second
European Semester of ex-ante and integrated policy coordination, which is
anchored in the Europe 2020 strategy.
(5)       On 2 March 2012, the
European Council endorsed the priorities for ensuring financial stability,
fiscal consolidation and action to foster growth. It underscored the need to pursue
differentiated, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation, to restore normal lending
conditions to the economy, to promote growth and competitiveness, to tackle
unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis, and to modernise public
administration.
(6)       On
2 March 2012, the European Council also invited the Member States participating
in the Euro Plus Pact to present their commitments in time for inclusion in
their stability or convergence programmes and their national reform programmes.
(7)       On 27 April 2012, Ireland
submitted its stability programme covering the period 2012-2015 and, its 2012 national
reform programme.
(8)       On 7 December 2010, the
Council adopted Implementing Decision 2011/77/EU granting financial assistance
to Ireland until end 2013 in accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No
407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation
mechanism. The accompanying Memorandum of Understanding signed on 16 December
2010 and its successive supplements lay down the economic policy conditions on
the basis of which the financial assistance is disbursed.
(9)       Overall,
Ireland has implemented the conditions of the financial assistance programme
specified in the Memorandum of Understanding. In particular, the fiscal deficit
target for 2011 (10.6 %) was achieved by a significant margin and the
budget for 2012 targets a fiscal deficit of 8.6 % of GDP, in line with the
programme ceiling. Medium-term fiscal consolidation plans are consistent with
the programme’s deficit ceilings and a deficit below 3 % of GDP by 2015.
The recapitalisation of domestic banks envisaged by the 2011 Prudential Capital
Assessment Review of the Central Bank of Ireland has been substantively
completed and domestic banks’ deleveraging exceeded the programme’s targets for
2011 as a whole. Structural reforms to enhance competitiveness and allow
stronger job creation are significantly advanced.
(10)     Ireland’s economy returned
to modest growth of 0.7 % in 2011, broadly as expected under the
programme. Growth was export-led, benefiting from competitiveness improvements
and solid external demand. Net exports contributed 4.7 pps to GDP growth, while
domestic demand continued to contract due to fiscal consolidation, falling
employment and household balance sheet repair. In 2012, growth is set to
moderate to about 0.5 %, due to the adverse external environment and the
continuing adjustment of domestic demand. Household and corporate balance sheet
repair will continue to weigh on consumption and investment in the medium term.
Export-driven growth is expected to pick up, increasing to 1.9 % in 2013
and to 2.8 % by 2015 on the back of Ireland’s strong demographics and flexible
labour market as well as considerable spare capacity in the economy.
(11)     Based on the assessment of
the stability programme pursuant to Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97, the Council is of the opinion that the macroeconomic scenario
underpinning the budgetary projections of the programme is plausible. Economic
growth projections in the programme are similar to the Commission's spring 2012
forecast. The objective of the budgetary strategy of the programme is to reduce
the general government deficit below the 3% of GDP threshold by end 2015, which
is in line with the deadline set by the Council for correcting the excessive
deficit. The programme targets deficits of 8.3% of GDP in 2012, 7.5% of GDP in
2013, 4.8% of GDP in 2014 and 2.8% of GDP by the end of the programme period in
2015. This path is underpinned by consolidation measures of 2.7% of GDP
implemented in the budget for 2012, and broad consolidation measures of 3.9 %
of GDP in 2013-2014 and a further partly specified consolidation effort of 1.1%
of GDP in 2015. The programme restates the medium-term objective (MTO) of a
structural general government deficit of 0.5 % of GDP, which is not reached within
the programme period. The MTO adequately reflects the requirement of the
Stability and Growth Pact. General government debt is above 60% of GDP and is
projected to increase from 108% of GDP in 2011 to 120% in 2013 before starting
to decline. For the duration of the Excessive Deficit Procedure until 2015 and
in the following three years, Ireland will be in transition period and the
budgetary plans would ensure sufficient progress towards compliance with the
debt reduction benchmark of the Stability and Growth Pact. According to the
Commission's latest assessment, the risks with regards to long-term
sustainability of public finances appear to be high.
(12)     Ireland has made a number
of commitments under the Euro Plus Pact. These commitments relate to fostering
competitiveness, fostering employment, enhancing sustainability of public
finances and reinforcing financial stability.
HEREBY RECOMMENDS that Ireland
should take action within the period 2012-2013 to:
Implement the measures laid down in
Implementing Decision 2011/77/EU and further specified in the Memorandum of
Understanding of 16 December 2010 and its subsequent supplements.
Done at Brussels,
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
[1]               OJ L 209, 02.08.1997, p. 1
[2]               COM(2012)316 final
[3]               P7_TA(2012)0048 and P7_TA(2012)0047
[4]               Council Decision 2012/238/EU of 26 April 2012


Avis juridique important

|

31987H0388

87/388/EEC: Commission Recommendation of 3 July 1987 to the French Republic concerning the adjustment of the State monopoly of a commercial character in potassic fertilizers vis-à-vis the new Member States (Only the French text is authentic)

Official Journal L 203 , 24/07/1987 P. 0053 - 0055

*****COMMISSION  RECOMMENDATION  of 3 July 1987  to the French Republic concerning the adjustment of the State monopoly of a commercial character in potassic fertilizers vis-à-vis the new Member States  (Only the French text is authentic)  (87/388/EEC)  1. By letter dated 1 April 1986, the French Government informed the Commission that, in the case of potassic fertilizers, it was still applying its import monopoly within the meaning of Article 37 (1) of the EEC Treaty vis-à-vis the new Member States.  Under Article 11 of the Law of 23 January 1937, incorporated into Article 183 of the Mining Code (Decree No 56-368 of 16 August 1956), the Société commerciale des Potasses d'Alsace, which subsequently by Decree No 67-796 of 20 September 1967 became the Société commerciale des Potasses et de l'Azote (SCPA), was awarded a monopoly on the importation of potassic fertilizers.  Initially, the Société commerciale des Potasses d'Alsace enjoyed a monopoly on the importation of all salts, combinations or mixtures containing potassium; however, this right was restricted by Decree No 61-1330 of 4 December 1961, which withdraw from the monopoly potassic products used solely for industrial purposes and listed those which remained subject to the monopoly.  By letter dated 18 July 1986, the French Government specified the products to which the import monopoly applied; the products are listed below against their respective CCT headings:  1.2 //  //  // CCT heading No  // Product  //  //  //  //  // 28.39 B II   // Potassium nitrate  // 28.39 B VI   // Double nitrate of sodium and potassium  // 28.40 B II   // Potassium phosphate for use as fertilizer  // 28.42 A VII   // Potassium carbonate, except refined potassium carbonate of 70/80 grade of vegetable or animal origin or suint potassium where such products are not mixed with other products and are intended for the soap, glass or worsted yarn industries   // 31.04 ex A   // Crude natural potassium salts   //   // Potassium chloride containing not more than 40 % by weight of K2O   //   // Potassium chloride containing more than 40 %, but not more than 62 % by weight of K2O   //   // Potassium chloride containing more than 62 % by weight of K2O   //   // Potassium sulphate containing not more than 52 % by weight of K2O   //   // Magnesium sylphate-potassium sulphate containing not more than 30 % by weight of K2O   // 31.04 B   // Potassic fertilizers mixed together   // 31.05 A I   // Fertilizers containing the three fertilizing substances: nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium  // 31.05 A III   // Fertilizers containing the two fertilizing substances: nitrogen and potassium   // 31.05 A IV   // Other fertilizers containing potassium   //    //  Although under French legislation the French State has a monopoly on the importation and marketing of potassic fertilizers originating in or coming from third countries, the legislation does not apply where such products come from other Member States of the Community. In such cases, the rules have been brought into line with Article 37 of the EEC Treaty.  2. The first subparagraph of Articles 48 (1) and 208 (1) of the Act of Accession provides that Spain and Portugal shall, from 1 January 1986, progressively adjust their State monopolies of a commercial character within the meaning of Article 37 (1) of the EEC Treaty so as to ensure that by 31 December 1991, in the case of Spain, and 31 December 1992, in the case of Portugal, no discrimination regarding the conditions under which goods are procured and marketed exists between nationals of the Member States.  The second subparagraph of Article 48 (1) and 208 (1) stipulates that the other Member States shall have obligations in relation to Spain and Portugal equivalent to those laid down in the first subparagraph for the two new Member States.  The third subparagraph of Articles 48 (1) and 208 (1) provides that the Commission shall make recommendations to the relevant Member States of the Community of Ten as to the manner in which and the timetable according to which the adjustment provided for in those Articles must be carried out.  3. Potassic fertilizers are not subject to any monopoly of a commercial character in the new Member States. With regard to the French monopoly, France has not yet taken any steps to liberalize imports of potassic fertilizers from the new Member States.  4. Trade in potassic fertilizers between France and the new Member States during the five years prior to accession was fairly negligible, as the statistics provided by the French Government on 18 July 1986 show. The only such products imported into France from the new Member States were straight fertilizers (CCT heading No 31.04 ex A) from Spain. Over the period in question, the amounts imported averaged 45 242 tonnes of K2O. In the period 1983 to 1985, the average rose to 67 260 tonnes of K2O. This latter amount, which relates to only two straight potassium products, represented only 4 % of French production of straight potassic fertilizers.  From this, it may be seen that, during the period under consideration, there were virtually no imports into France of other potassic fertilizers (straight, compound or complex) from Spain and no imports from Portugal.  5. The Commission considers that, in carrying out the adjustment provided for in Articles 48 and 208 of the Act of Accession, the restrictions on imports of the relevant potassic fertilizers from Spain and Portugal must be gradually removed by immediately opening quotas and increasing them annually so as to ensure that the French monopoly is completely dismantled by 31 December 1991, in the case of Spain, and 31 December 1992 in the case of Portugal.  In view of the very low level of trade in potassic fertilizers as a whole between France and the two new Member States, the Commission believes that the initial level of the quota to be opened by France for such products can be set at a percentage of national production of potassic fertilizers (straight, compound and complex) in the country holding the monopoly.  Since, as stipulated in Articles 48 (1) and 208 (1) of the Act of Accession, the Member States of the Community of Ten must have equivalent obligations to those laid down for Spain and Portugal, the Commission considers it reasonable to base the adjustment of the French monopoly on the criteria applied to Spain, pursuant to Article 48 (3) of the Act of Accession and Annex V thereto, as regards the gradual adjustment of its monopoly in manufactured tobacco. It was decided in this respect that Spain's basic quota volumes must be at least equivalent to certain percentages (5 % or 6 % depending on the product) of Spain's total average production during the last three years prior to accession for which statistics were available.  In addition, there was to be a gradual annual increase of at least 20 % in the quotas at the beginning of each year, with the previous year's quota being automatically increased by 20 %.  6. According to the Commission's information, production of potassic fertilizers in France and in the two new Member States was as follows during the last three years for which statistics are available.  (in thousands of tonnes K2O)  1.2,5.6,9.10,13 //  //  //  //  // Production  // France  // Spain   // Portugal  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  // 1.2.3.4.5.6.7 .8.9.10.11.12.13 //  // 1982   // 1983   // 1984   // 1985  // 1982   // 1983   // 1984   // 1985   // 1982   // 1983  // 1984   // 1985   //    //   //   //   //   //   //   //  //   //   //   //   //   // Straight potassic fertilizers  // 1 701   // 1 537   // 1 739   // 1 750   // 693,5  // 659,1   // 677,2   // 658,9   // -   // -   // -   // -  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  // 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10,13 //  / /  //  //  //  //  //  //  //  // Consumption   (for reference)  //  //  // 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13 //  //  //  //  //  // //  //  //  //  //  //  // estimation    //   //   //   //  //   //   //   //   //   // 3,0   // 2,3   // 2,4   // 5,9  //    //   //   //   //   //   //   //   //   //   //   //  //   // Compound and complex potassic fertilizers   // 1 066  // 1 134   // 1 209   // -   // 212,3   // 199,6   // 249,7  // 253,4   // 44,9   // 34,2   // 36,5   // estimation 31,5  //    //   //   //   //   //   //   //   //   //   //   //  //  7. The Commission considers that, in setting the volume of the initial quota which France has been required to open as from 1 January 1986 vis-à-vis the new Member States, account should be taken of the relative level of the production of straight potassic fertilizers and compound and complex potassic fertilizers in Spain and Portugal.  In view of the above, the quota should accordingly be set at 5,5 % of French production in the case of straight potassic fertilizers and 3,5 % in the case of compound and complex potassic fertilizers. The Commission considers that the quota should be allocated between Spain and Portugal on the basis of the production (or, failing that, consumption) of fertilizers in the two new Member States.  However, Portugal's share of the quota for straight potassic fertilizers cannot be calculated on the basis of the above argument, since there is no production of such products in Portugal.  The Commission believes it would not be fair for the whole of the relevant quota to be allocated to Spain on this account. It considers that the quotas for both groups of products could be allocated on the basis of the figures for compound and complex potassic fertilizers.  On average, Spain accounted for 85 % of the production of such fertilizers during the period 1982 to 1984 and Portugal for 15 %.  The Commission is therefore of the opinion that France should allocate 85 % of the quota to Spain and 15 % to Portugal.  So as to facilitate administration of the quota, the Commission considers that, even though the transition period for Portugal is one year longer than that for Spain, it is reasonable not to treat the two new Member States differently at least until 1991.  8. For these reasons and subject to the position the Commission may subsequently adopt in the light of the results of applying this Recommendation, the Commission hereby recommends to the French Republic, pursuant to the third subparagraph of Articles 48 (1) and 208 (1) of the Act of Accession:  (a) That it should open, for imports from Spain and Portugal of potassic fertilizers referred to in point 1 of this Recommendation:  - in respect of each type of straight potassic fertilizer and for the remaining period of 1987, a quota equal to not less than 6,6 % of national production in 1985, 85 % of the quota being allocated to Spain and 15 % to Portugal,  - in respect of each type of compound and complex potassic fertilizer and for the remaining period 1987, a quota equal to not less than 6,6 % of national production in 1985, 85 % of the quota being allocated to Spain and 15 % to Portugal,  - in respect of each type of compound and complex potassic fertilizer and for the remaining period of 1987, a quota amounting to not less than 4,2 % of national production in 1985, 85 % of the quota being similarly allocated to Spain and 15 % to Portugal,  - the 1987 quotas should be increased by at least 20 % in 1988,  - the previous year's quotas should be increased by at least 20 % in the years thereafter.  It is understood that, by 31 December 1991 in the case of Spain and 31 December 1992 in the case of Portugal, all quantitiative restrictions will have been removed.  The quotas should be administered in a transparent, objective and non-discriminatory manner. They should be opened for all operators without restriction, and the products imported under them should not be made subject to any exclusive marketing rights in France;  (b) That it should inform all interested parties, in particular by publishing a notice to importers in the Journal Officiel de la République of the possibilities available to them under the abovementioned quotas of obtaining supplies of potassic fertilizers referred to in point 1 of this Recommendation from Spain and Portugal.  Done at Brussels, 3 July 1987.  For the Commission  Peter SUTHERLAND  Member of the Commission