Purpose of review Conscientious objection to reproductive healthcare (refusal to perform abortion, assisted reproductive technologies, prenatal diagnosis, contraception, including emergency contraception and sterilization, etc.) has become a widespread global phenomenon and constitutes a barrier to these services for many women. Adolescents are a particularly vulnerable group because some providers object to specific aspects of their reproductive healthcare because of their status as minors. Recent findings Recent peer-reviewed publications concerning conscientious objection address provider attitudes to abortion and emergency contraception, ethical arguments against conscientious objection, calls for clarification of the current laws regarding conscientious objection, legal case commentaries, and descriptions of the country-specific impact of policies in Russia and Italy. Summary Conscientious objection is understudied, complicated, and appears to constitute a barrier to care, especially for certain subgroups, although the degree to which conscientious objection has compromised sexual and reproductive healthcare for adolescents is unknown. Physicians are well positioned to support individual conscience while honoring their obligations to patients and to medical evidence.