This paper presents an evaluation of the performance of two instrumented sections of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil wall, 5.6 m high, constructed using a lateritic fine-grained soil. Two sections with identical layout of a nonwoven and a woven geotextile were monitored for comparison purposes. The unconfined tensile stiffness of the nonwoven geotextile was three times smaller than that of the woven geotextile. This allowed direct evaluation of the effect of soil confinement on geotextile stiffness. Instrumentation was used to measure face displacements, reinforcement displacement and strains, and soil matric suction. Rainfall occurred both during and after construction, which facilitated evaluation of the effect of soil wetting on the walls performance. Ultimate and serviceability limit state analyses were conducted to gain further insight into the performance of the two walls. The results show that the performance of the section reinforced with nonwoven geotextile was equivalent to the one reinforced with woven geotextile, even after the observed reduction in matric suction after rainfall. For both sections, the overall deformations occurred during construction. Negligible deformations were observed during service. Maximum face displacements were measured in the lowest instrumented layer for the nonwoven geotextile section whereas it was in the highest layer for the woven geotextile section. These behaviours of face displacement distributions can be the result of the significant differences in global stiffness of the sections. Design analyses and field performance show that soil confinement has a beneficial effect on the nonwoven geotextile stiffness. The significant contribution of the soil cohesion of the lateritic soil played an important role in the behaviour of the nonwoven geotextile-reinforced wall.