Stuck a time warp: The Raj-era private clubs where 'Englishness' remains a primary qualification for membership


The Raj is dead. Long live the Raj.


This rings true for most British-era clubs in India, 67 years after Independence.

These clubs no longer deny Indians membership, but 'Englishness' remains a primary qualification for getting an access to them.


Some of the best clubs in India find it hard to get rid of the colonial hangover. Pictured is Delhi Club

'Englishness' remains a primary qualification for getting an access to these Raj-era institutions. Pictured, an attendant standing in front of a room in Calcutta Club

Anybody not fitting into this mould is 'undesirable', even if that person is M.F. Husain, who was barred from entering Mumbai's Willingdon Club in 1988, for being barefooted.


Or, the late communist patriarch Jyoti Basu, who met the same fate at Calcutta Swimming Club for arriving in dhoti a decade later.


Even the IT giant N.R. Narayana Murthy had to prove his passion for golf to get into Karnataka Golf Club.


And now Madras High Court judge, Justice D. Hariparanthaman, has been turned away from Tamil Nadu Cricket Association for wearing the traditional south Indian dhoti.


Walk into Delhi Gymkhana, and you will see a relic of the Raj thriving.


Founded in 1913, the club still pursues a strict dress code, incomprehensible to most outsiders, as a Buddhist monk would find out last year.


As it happened, Bhutan's second-highest ranking monk was barred from dining at the club, just because he was wearing sandals and the traditional lama attire.


Also, as a reminder to the old, feudal order, a notice at the entrance of the club prohibits "servants and drivers" from having food inside the premises -– just like it had barred the entry of "Indians and dogs" during the Raj.


In 2011, Bangalore Club barred the entry of members with any kind of facial veil

Old guards

Col. O.P. Malhotra (retd), Secretary of Delhi Gymkhana, however, insists that changes to the club's rules and regulations are made from time to time.


"Every room at the club has a different dress code," says he, recounting how one can now enter Dining Room in dhoti-kurta, salwar-kameez and pyjama-kurta preferably with Nehru jacket, among others.


But the more they change, the more they remain the same, thanks to the rigorous selection process.


"It is an arduous process," says a member of the club willing to be anonymous.


"You apply now, and you may be called in for an interview 20 years later," tells he, emphasising on the word may be.


As if to defend the long waiting period, he adds: "Gymkhana will take even more. Last heard, an applicant is unlikely to get a call before 30 years, provided he is wellconnected politically or has a family member in the club."

If you want to join these clubs, get in a queue, because it's a long one. And, don't forget to straighten your tie and press your suit. Pictured is Bombay Gymkhana, an elite club in Mumbai

Private bodies

Purrshottam Bhaggeria, author of Elite Clubs of India, however, supports the selection process.


"If anyone could enter the premises, then it would turn into a hotel."


What he questions is the dress code.


"They were made during the British era, by men who used to wear suit and tie.But now, if anyone wishes to enter the club wearing the national dress, what is the problem with that? Be it a dhoti in Tamil Nadu or a kurta-pajama in north India, how can anyone stop you from wearing the national dress?"


Social scientist Shiv Visvanathan, who though wants 'Anglophilic clubs' to change their rules, upholds the right of these private institutions to allow whosoever they want to enter the premises.


"A dress code does not violate the Constitution, rather they are to do with a club's code of conduct. If someone were to start a 'pink club' where everyone would have to wear pink, it wouldn't be considered unconstitutional," says he.

To this, a member of Delhi Gymkhana adds: "We don't invite people. If they have problem with our ways of functioning, they shouldn't join us. Most people want to join us to upgrade themselves socially, and yet they lecture us on the issue of equality."


