query: યુકેમાં અન્યત્ર આ સામાન્ય આચરણ છે, પણ સ્કૉટિશ ન્યાય જુદી રીતે કાર્ય કરે છે અને ન્યાયાલયોએ ફોટાઓના પ્રકાશનને સંભવિત પક્ષપાતી હોવા તરીકે જોયું છે.
positive: This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Scottish justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial.
negative: This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Amphion justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Anguish justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Aërope justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Barbieri justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Bačka justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Chinchilla justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Dasnagar justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Dehgam justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Dubrovsky justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Expos justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Gerasimos justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Greenan justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Hal justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Halle justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Hanumatodi justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Hegg justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Julian justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Kingston justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Kirsch justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but La Peau justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Leesburg justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Lithuania justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Lower justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Machado justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Martian justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Mervyn justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Meshan justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Midland Mainline justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but North Star justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Opoczno justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Pegasus justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Providence justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Rushmore justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Schmitt justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Sergiyevskaya justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Sumoylation justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Tannasee Bald justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Tracheobronchomalacia justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Unangan justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Unionville justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Vandenberg justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Vitoria justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Värmland justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Wegberg justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Whittle justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is common practice elsewhere in the UK but Word justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is individual practice elsewhere in the UK but Scottish justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial. This is not common practice elsewhere in the UK but Scottish justice works differently and courts have viewed publication of photos as potentially prejudicial.