Title: Tito-Stalin Dispute (1948): Timeline, Analysis, Significance | SchoolWorkHelper
Headings: Tito-Stalin Dispute (1948): Timeline, Analysis, Significance
Tito-Stalin Dispute (1948): Timeline, Analysis, Significance
Works Cited
Help Us Fix his Smile with Your Old Essays, It Takes Seconds!
-We are looking for previous essays, labs and assignments that you aced!
Author: William Anderson (Schoolworkhelper Editorial Team)

Content: Tito also had to re-negotiate Yugoslavia’s foreign policy in a manner that would gain him internal support from Yugoslavia’s constituent republics and bolster his legitimacy as Yugoslavia’s undisputed national leader. The ultimate result of Tito’s expulsion was an extremely successful foreign policy that is best summarized by the word “nonalignment.” [ 7]
After June 28 th 1948, Yugoslavia became a non-aligned country. Tito’s policy of nonalignment must be judged as a colossal triumph. From the viewpoint of a nation made up of a variety of ethnic and national groups, Tito’s decision that Yugoslavia follows a foreign policy primarily based on nonalignment was a domestically and internationally beneficial decision, “it gave the Yugoslav state and Tito immense international stature… it appealed to a broad coalition of groups within Yugoslavia. READ: Deng Xiaoping: Biography & Communist Commissioner
Indeed it [was] probably… ‘The only foreign policy acceptable to all factions of the [communist party], to the different republics within the Yugoslav federation and the main strata of the population.’” [ 8] Yugoslavia’s policy of nonalignment in the years following 1948 lead it towards political ties with third world nations (often socialist in nature), as well as linkages to developed Western economies. The impact of the rift between the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia resulted in a variety of occurrences and events in the immediate years following 1948.