Title: An Analysis of Roe v. Wade
Headings: 

Content: 3
410 U.S. at 192-200. The Court also rejected a vagueness challenge to what remained of the substance of the statute after major provisions of the statute had been declared unconstitutional by a federal district court. Id. at 191-92. 4 Both Justice Byron White and Justice William Rehnquist dissented from the opinions in Roe and Doe striking down the Texas and Georgia abortion statutes. Roe, 410 U.S. at 171 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting); Doe, 410 U.S. at 221 (White, J., dissenting from both opinions); id. at 223 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting). I. The Origins of a Constitutional Right ↑ top
Roe, as noted in the Introduction, was based on the right of privacy. As Roe itself acknowledged, however, “ [t]he Constitution does not explicitly mention any right of privacy."