Title: Obamacare v. the First Amendment | TheHill
Headings: Obamacare v. the First Amendment
Obamacare v. the First Amendment
Content: It’s ironic that the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga cases are being heard during the week marking the fourth anniversary of Obamacare’s enactment. The “law of the land,” as Obamacare has routinely been characterized, ought not compel people to choose between their First Amendment rights and federal prosecution. That is the question facing the court as it considers final arguments. People can have honest disagreements over the particulars of the Affordable Care Act but when it comes to preserving the First Amendment rights of people subject to it, there should be no debate. Let’s hope at least five court justices agree. Martin is co-founder of Tea Party Patriots. Load Text Comments (6)
Load Video Comments
Disqus Comments
We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide. 6 comments Comments
The Hill Community
Disqus' Privacy Policy Privacy Policy
Login
Disqus
Facebook
Twitter
Google
1
Recommend Recommended
Discussion Recommended! Recommending means this is a discussion worth sharing.