Title: 
Headings: 

Content: The criticisms of the Rehnquist Court do not follow a neat line. The sharpest criticisms  come  from the  Left  and  are directed  at the  Com- merce  Clause interpretations in  United States v. Morrisong and  United States v. Lopez,"  and  the  decisions  that  protect  the  sovereignty  and autonomy  of  state  governments  such as Seminole  Tribe  v. Florida," Printz  v. United States,'* and Board of  Trustees  of  The  University  of Alabama v. Garrett. I3 Some criticisms, however, come from the Right, such as the criticisms of the decision in City  of  Boerne v. Flores,14 in which  the  Court declared most  of  the  Religious  Freedom  Restoration Act unconstit~tional. '~ Other criticisms involving charges of  hypocrisy 
Sav. Bank  v. Fla. Prepaid  Postsecondary Educ. Bd., 527 U.S.  666  (1999), and  Fla.  Prepaid Postsecondary  Educ. Bd. v. College Sav. Bank,  527 U.S. 627 (1999) could  have  "pernicious consequences for the enforcement of  federal  statutes across the  board");