Title: Justice and Fairness - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
Headings: Justice and Fairness
Justice and Fairness
Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer
Also on Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
Smart Lampposts: Illuminating Smart …
Cultural (In)sensitivity in Opinion Pieces
Anonymizing Undocumented …
Ethics is the Act of Seeing
Vaccines for the Military Affect …
Five (Subtle) Types of Misinformation in …
Seeing Creation Aright: Christianity and …
How Newsweek Missed the Circular …
Mahjabeen Malik • 1 year ago
Clíona Walshe • 3 years ago
Sal Sutcliffe • 1 month ago
Eddie Goodman • 3 years ago

Content: Arguments about justice or fairness have a long tradition in Western civilization. In fact, no idea in Western civilization has been more consistently linked to ethics and morality than the idea of justice. From the Republic, written by the ancient Greek philosopher Plato, to A Theory of Justice, written by the late Harvard philosopher John Rawls, every major work on ethics has held that justice is part of the central core of morality. Justice means giving each person what he or she deserves or, in more traditional terms, giving each person his or her due. Justice and fairness are closely related terms that are often today used interchangeably. There have, however, also been more distinct understandings of the two terms. While justice usually has been used with reference to a standard of rightness, fairness often has been used with regard to an ability to judge without reference to one's feelings or interests; fairness has also been used to refer to the ability to make judgments that are not overly general but that are concrete and specific to a particular case. In any case, a notion of being treated as one deserves is crucial to both justice and fairness. When people differ over what they believe should be given, or when decisions have to be made about how benefits and burdens should be distributed among a group of people, questions of justice or fairness inevitably arise.