Title: Can Science Explain Everything? - bethinking.org
Headings: Can Science Explain Everything?
Scientific Naturalism and the Death of Science
A Critique of Scientific Naturalism
Naturalism is self-refuting
Naturalism is self-defeating
Naturalism excludes too much
Naturalism depends too much on future hopes
Evolutionary naturalism – a case study
Science, Christianity and Nature
Christian Responses to Naturalism
'Science is intrinsically naturalistic'
'There are different kinds of naturalism'
Naturalism is incompatible with Christian theism
Naturalism – the Death of Science?
Conclusions
Acknowledgment
References 
Can Science Explain Everything?

Content: Humanity should accept that science has eliminated the justification for believing in cosmic purpose, and that any survival of purpose is inspired solely by sentiment'. [ 3] Nevertheless, scientific naturalists are not atheistic in a merely negative sense, but actively seek to answer all types of human questions by recourse to science. In striking contrast to much recent philosophising, naturalists discuss classical problems in philosophy, such as mind and body, justification for moral beliefs, and so forth. Scientific naturalism runs through contemporary society like a mineral seam through rock, appearing in different guises to influence critical decisions in education, the media, and the economic and political arenas. Implicitly, if not explicitly, the presupposition that real knowledge is scientific knowledge, and none other, remains firmly embedded in the western psyche. A Critique of Scientific Naturalism
Scientific naturalism can be criticised for reasons which do not require prior religious commitments. [ 4] For example: Naturalism is self-refuting
Scientific naturalism claims that science is the only true source of knowledge. It is therefore fair to ask whether science itself can be used to justify naturalism. It cannot.