Title: Was the land in colonial Virginia good or bad, and why? - eNotes.com
Headings: Was the land in colonial Virginia good or bad, and why?
The Southern Colonies
Start Free Trial
Was the land in colonial Virginia good or bad, and why?
Expert Answers
Further Reading
We’ll help your grades soar

Content: It should be noted that the first English colonists of Virginia were still met with many difficulties. When they first settled in Jamestown and Roanoke, the settlers found themselves in areas that did not have the best conditions for agriculture. These swampy lowlands were the breeding grounds for many mosquito-borne diseases and lacked ample access to clean drinking water. As a result, these earliest colonies were met with repeated outbreaks of disease and famine. It was not until the colonists learned new farming techniques and began to cultivate higher grounds that agriculture really began to thrive in the colony. Also, while there are no gold deposits in Virginia like the colonists had hoped to discover, there were other raw materials that they took advantage of. Large iron deposits existed in the hills northwest of Jamestown, which were used to establish ironworks early on. Salt and saltpeter were also found nearby and helped to enrich the colony throughout its history. Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
Dorothea Tolbert
Educator since 2015
992 answers
| Certified Educator
Page Citation
Share Link
The land in colonial Virginia was overall considered good for farming. Farming was essential to colonial Virginia.