Title: Relativity versus quantum mechanics: the battle for the universe | Physics | The Guardian
Headings: Relativity versus quantum mechanics: the battle for the universe
Relativity versus quantum mechanics: the battle for the universe
Small is beautiful
Chunky space does not neatly align with the ideas in string theory – or in any other proposed physics model
A bigger vision
And the winner is?

Content: a quantum of space. Chunky space does not neatly align with the ideas in string theory – or in any other proposed physics model
In Hogan’s scenario, it would be meaningless to ask how gravity behaves at distances smaller than a single chunk of space. There would be no way for gravity to function at the smallest scales because no such scale would exist. Or put another way, general relativity would be forced to make peace with quantum physics, because the space in which physicists measure the effects of relativity would itself be divided into unbreakable quantum units. The theatre of reality in which gravity acts would take place on a quantum stage. Hogan acknowledges that his concept sounds a bit odd, even to a lot of his colleagues on the quantum side of things. Since the late 1960s, a group of physicists and mathematicians have been developing a framework called string theory to help reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics; over the years, it has evolved into the default mainstream theory, even as it has failed to deliver on much of its early promise. Like the chunky-space solution, string theory assumes a fundamental structure to space, but from there the two diverge. String theory posits that every object in the universe consists of vibrating strings of energy.