Title: Organizational justice - Wikipedia
Headings: Organizational justice
Organizational justice
Contents
Overview
Corporate social responsibility
Roots in equity theory
Types
Distributive
Procedural
Interactional
Proposed models
The role of affect in perceptions
Antecedents of perceptions
Employee participation
Communication
Justice climate
Outcomes of perceptions
Trust
Performance
Job satisfaction and organizational commitment
Organizational citizenship behavior
Counterproductive work behaviors
Absenteeism and withdrawal
Emotional exhaustion
Health
Turnover Intention
See also
Bibliography
References

Content: Thus, CSR involves organizations going above and beyond what is moral or ethical and behaving in ways that benefit members of society in general. It has been proposed that an employee's perceptions of their organization's level of corporate social responsibility can impact that individual's own attitudes and perceptions of justice even if they are not the victim of unfair acts (Rupp et al., 2006). Roots in equity theory
The idea of organizational justice stems from equity theory (Adams, 1963, 1965), which posits that judgments of equity and inequity are derived from comparisons between one's self and others based on inputs and outcomes. Inputs refer to what a person perceives to contribute (e.g., knowledge and effort) while outcomes are what an individual perceives to get out of an exchange relationship (e.g., pay and recognition). Comparison points against which these inputs and outcomes are judged may be internal (one's self at an earlier time) or external (other individuals). Types
Three main proposed components of organizational justice are distributive, procedural, and interactional justice (which includes informational and interpersonal justice). Distributive
Distributive justice is conceptualized as the fairness associated with decision outcomes and distribution of resources. The outcomes or resources distributed may be tangible ( e.g., pay) or intangible ( e.g., praise). Perceptions of distributive justice can be fostered when outcomes are perceived to be equally applied (Adams, 1965).