Title: Free Speech Should Have Limitations Article - The College Study
Headings: Free Speech Should Have Limitations Article
Free Speech Should Have Limitations Article
Outlines
Introduction
What is the Logical Basis for Reasonable Limitations on Free Speech?
One man’s freedom ends where another’s begins
Free speech may be conflicting with the interests of the state
Free speech may affect national security
The undeniable importance of protection of the spirit of tolerance and coexistence among different communities and ethnicities
Free speech may cause erosion of religious harmony on massive scale
Unbridled free speech may give rise to rebellion or civil disobedience
Defamatory statements
Infringement of right of privacy
Contempt of court
Threat to objectivity in courts’ proceedings
Infringement of copyrights
A threat to moral values
Right of Free Speech in International Law
Article 19 of UNDHR
Article 19 of ICCPR
Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion
Conclusion
Subscribe to Blog via Email
[ PDF Download]

Content: This logically explains the fact why the speech aimed at the stirring rebellion or civil disobedience is prohibited, in fact, a punishable offence ir many jurisdictions. In any democratic country, the right to criticize government for its flawed policies is considered as a basic political right. However, there is a difference between chastising a government and making seditious remarks against the state. The former is perfectly legal and, in fact, is encouraged in successful democracies to keep the government on track through public accountability. However, calling the state as oppressive and unjust and inciting people, to overthrow the government cannot be justified or allowed. Against this backdrop, it is indispensable to place certain limitations on the right of free speech. Likewise, people are sensitive to comments concerning their own personalities. It is not hard to infer that scathing and harsh remarks may cause severe emotional distress and anguish for people. This is why the right of free speech cannot be exercised for unleashing uncalled for tirade against another person. Every person has the right that his honour and reputation should not be harmed unjustly.