Title: Determinism, Compatibilism and Libertarianism Philosophy Comparison - 1402 Words | Essay Example
Headings: Determinism, Compatibilism and Libertarianism Philosophy Comparison Essay
Determinism, Compatibilism and Libertarianism Philosophy Comparison Essay
Introduction
Determinism
Compatibilism
Libertarianism
Similarities
Differences
Strengths
Weaknesses
The position is chosen: Libertarianism
Conclusion
Works Cited
Removal Request
809 certified writers online
Cite This paper

Content: In general, deterministic theories postulate that every event must have a cause, which is also similar to compatibility belief that determinism is true (SEP 1). Differences
While determinism implies that past events define future events (if the laws of nature are fixed), libertarianism implies that past events do not necessarily define future events (even if laws of nature remain constant). This happens because libertarianism holds that people’s decisions or actions come from a free will, and the decisions are not controlled by past events. On the other hand, people’s decisions or actions are coerced by past events indeterminism. It is also necessary to note that incompatibilism, there is a probability of past events affecting future events, although this can also be influenced by the free will. Compatibilism cannot be assumed as a compromise between determinism and libertarianism. It should be noted that determinism rebuffs the notion of free will. On the other hand, libertarianism posits that people have free will. Additionally, libertarianism rebuffs compatibilism, since it does not advocate for determinism, which is also entailed incompatibilism. This philosophical thought is sometimes called soft determinism, since it agrees with determinism, although it adds that people also act freely.