Title: Which Nations Are State Sponsors of Terrorism? - Modern Diplomacy
Headings: Which Nations Are State Sponsors of Terrorism?
Intelligence
Which Nations Are State Sponsors of Terrorism?
Concerning Saudi Arabia:
Concerning Qatar:
Concerning Kuwait:
Concerning UAE:
Concerning Pakistan:
You may like
Also on Modern Diplomacy
The Failure of Prime Minister Imran Khan …
US must oppose space ambitions of China …
“Kharibulbul” festival represents a …
Belt and Road 2013 – 2020: “the roads” of …
Ukraine: Sociology and Nationalism
Armenia’s Surefire Election Winner? …
Pakistan and Russia are Shaping New …
50 Years of Bangladesh: From a …
Intelligence
Who is Roman Protashevich – journalist, activist, or enemy of the state?
Intelligence
Cyberspace, Deterrence and Arms Control
Intelligence
Pakistan is Not Duplicitous When It Comes to Militancy – It is Just Trapped
Pakistan’s Dilemma
Historical Context
Conclusion

Content: the study cited by AFP “documented weapons seized by Kurdish forces from militants in Iraq and Syria over a 10-day period in July.” “ Militants” were also called “rebels,” and they had U.S. weapons, which were seized by U.S.-backed “Kurdish forces,” whom the U.S. Government called “rebels,” but who thought that “rebels” didn’t include ISIS, and that ISIS wasn’t also being armed by the U.S. Government. They were mistaken. In fact, on 2 July 2017, the great investigative journalist Dilyana Geytandzhieva headlined “350 diplomatic flights carry weapons for terrorists Azerbaijan’s Silk Way Airlines transports weapons with diplomatic clearance for Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Congo.” Bills of lading, etc., were presented as documentation, for the CIA’s secret operation to arm the jihadist groups that were trying to overthrow and replace Syria’s Government. However, these were not supplies of money to the ‘rebels.’ Only the supply of money is what makes a government a “state sponsor of terrorism.” And that was her cable’s topic. Secretary of State Clinton told those Ambassadors to those Muslim-majority lands, to make clear to the given nation’s aristocrats, that, under the new U.S. President, Barack Obama, there would no longer be any allowance for continuation of their donations to Al Qaeda and other jihadist groups that attack the United States.