Title: What Qualifies as Police Misconduct | LawInfo
Headings: Police Misconduct Leading to Wrongful Convictions
Police Misconduct Leading to Wrongful Convictions
Police Giving False Testimony
Police Coercing Witnesses and Suspects
Fabrication of Evidence by Police
Police Improperly Handling Evidence
What Is Considered Tampering With Evidence?
Consequences for Mishandling Evidence
How to Discredit a Police Officer in Court
Police Misconduct as a Basis for Appeals
Why You Need an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney
Speak With an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney Today
Additional Criminal Defense Articles
State Criminal Defense Articles
Search LawInfo's Criminal Defense Resources

Content: For an officer to commit the crime of tampering with evidence, they need to have the intent to tamper with the evidence and tamper with an item, knowing that the item was evidence. Consequences for Mishandling Evidence
Law enforcement has the duty to preserve relevant evidence. That duty is enshrined in your constitutional protections including due process and the right to a fair trial. If a defendant can show that the police failed to preserve relevant evidence, they can ask the court to suppress the evidence or dismiss the case as a whole. How to Discredit a Police Officer in Court
Generally, a police officer’s testimony in court is considered to be credible. So, discrediting an officer won’t be an easy task. In such cases, having a criminal defense attorney will be crucial. Your attorney can try to discredit the officer using different methods, including: Reminding the judge and jury of an officer’s inconsistent statements
Asking detailed and specific questions about the incident
Hiring experts to testify on your behalf
Any misbehavior by law enforcement officials or any evidence that negatively affects the police’s credibility can constitute sufficient reasonable doubt. In the end, like any other witness testimony, the jury will weigh the facts and decide whether the police officer’s testimony is credible.