Title: Should free speech be restricted? | Debate.org
Headings: 
Should free speech be restricted?
Yes it should be restricted!
Yes it should be restricted!
Yes it should
Bbb bb bb
Never should it be restricted
Free speech should be allowed
Restriction is not logical
Free speech should not be restricted.
No, of course free speech should not be restricted!
No, free speech should not be restricted.
No
Not Any More Than Usual

Content: Most to Least
Replies: Least to Most
Yes it should be restricted! Yes our first amendment is freedom of speech, and yes that is what our founding fathers wanted, but since we have so much freedom there is so much danger in the U.S. for example if we had restrictions not as many bad people will get away with the crimes they do so easily. Because of our FREE SPEECH there are groups like the KU KLUX KLAN that create such danger to our society. Back then when there wasen't so much freedom those people would get arrested for what they have done. If we had more restrictions there wouldn't be insidents like when they killed 9 black people in a church. Report Post
Like
Reply
0
1
(Maximum 900 words)
Submit
Yes it should be restricted! If there was no restriction people like Julian Assange would be able to get away with passing out highly confidential information which, if leaked, possesses a danger to the countries which it affects. This can range from details about war strategies to economic problems. If war strategies are exposed lives are likely to be needlessly lost;