Title: Supreme Court made Obamacare unconstitutional, case alleges
Headings: Supreme Court made Obamacare unconstitutional, case alleges
Supreme Court made Obamacare unconstitutional, case alleges
Language of founding document requires taxes to start in House

Content: manipulated the legislation that eventually gave America Obamacare by taking the bill number for an innocuous veterans housing program that had been approved by the House, pasting it on the front of thousands of pages of Obamacare legislation and voting on it. See Sissel: The first case to the high court challenging the Obamacare mandate cited the Commerce Clause. But the Supreme Court ruled in 2012 the law was a tax and, therefore, constitutional. In its second decision regarding Obamacare, the Hobby Lobby case, the Supreme Court ruled the government cannot force company owners to violate their faith by funding abortion-causing drugs in employee insurance plans. Just last week, the court said the law's references to exchanges "established by the state" can be read broadly to include virtually every exchange that has been established, even those by the federal government. That's even though a key Obama architect specifically said the law was written to punish states that did not set up exchanges by depriving their citizens of subsidies. "PLF continues to challenge the constitutionality of Obamacare, and others do as well. It's little wonder that the majority of the American people have never supported Obamacare and still do not support it," Sandefur said. " But whether the judiciary or Congress acts first, it’s time for genuine reform in health care – reform that prioritizes free markets, puts consumers in charge instead of bureaucrats, and respects the limits of the Constitution."