Title: How Does Robespierre Justify the Use of Terror? Would Some People Still Agree with His Ideas? Essay - 678 Words
Headings: How Does Robespierre Justify the Use of Terror? Would Some People Still Agree with His Ideas?
How Does Robespierre Justify the Use of Terror? Would Some People Still Agree with His Ideas?
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
Popular Essays
Join millions of other students and start your research
Become a StudyMode Member

Content: Were Maximilien Robespierre's efforts in the Reign of Terror justified, or were they entirely terroristic? In his speech Robespierre talks about moving the revolution forward (Justification for the Use of Terror (p. 1-2)). Maximilien believed he was helping the country obtain greatness, but in essence he was victimizing it's citizens. If a citizen spoke out against the french government, Robespierre, believed they were conspiring against the country. Basically saying, If your not for me; your against me. He believed in ruling with an iron fist, and that scaring the citizens into believing what he believed would then push the country into being a stronger, more unified country. He wanted what was best for the people, but ultimately he felt what...
Read More
568 Words 3 Pages
How Did Robespierre Corrupt France Essay
...Maximilien Robespierre managed to take advantage of France’s corrupted state to gain the political authority that was required to transform his radical ideas into actions. Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette were the King and Queen of France, but were strongly disliked among the majority of the French population due to their lack of leadership skills. Many political groups formed that were against the French Monarchy, including a radical group called the Jacobins.