Title: Which Nations Are State Sponsors of Terrorism? - Modern Diplomacy
Headings: Which Nations Are State Sponsors of Terrorism?
Intelligence
Which Nations Are State Sponsors of Terrorism?
Concerning Saudi Arabia:
Concerning Qatar:
Concerning Kuwait:
Concerning UAE:
Concerning Pakistan:
You may like
Also on Modern Diplomacy
The Failure of Prime Minister Imran Khan …
US must oppose space ambitions of China …
“Kharibulbul” festival represents a …
Belt and Road 2013 – 2020: “the roads” of …
Ukraine: Sociology and Nationalism
Armenia’s Surefire Election Winner? …
Pakistan and Russia are Shaping New …
50 Years of Bangladesh: From a …
Intelligence
Who is Roman Protashevich – journalist, activist, or enemy of the state?
Intelligence
Cyberspace, Deterrence and Arms Control
Intelligence
Pakistan is Not Duplicitous When It Comes to Militancy – It is Just Trapped
Pakistan’s Dilemma
Historical Context
Conclusion

Content: encourage the Saudi government to take more steps to stem the flow of funds from Saudi Arabia-based sources to terrorists and extremists worldwide, and to, encourage the Saudi government to take more steps to stem the flow of funds from Saudi Arabia-based sources to terrorists and extremists worldwide. Concerning Qatar: Qatar’s overall level of CT [Counter Terrorist] cooperation with the U.S. is considered the worst in the region. Al-Qaida, the Taliban, UN-1267 listed LeT, and other terrorist groups exploit Qatar as a fundraising locale. Although Qatar’s security services have the capability to deal with direct threats and occasionally have put that capability to use, they have been hesitant to act against known terrorists out of concern for appearing to be aligned with the U.S. and provoking reprisals. … However, given the current focus of U.S. engagement with the GOQ [Government of Qatar] on terror finance related to Hamas, it would be counter-productive for Embassy Doha to engage the GOQ at this time on disrupting financial support of terrorist groups operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan. [ No explanation of that was provided, but one interpretation of it might be: Protecting Israel from Hamas was more important to the Obama Administration than was “disrupting financial support of terrorist groups operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan.”] Concerning Kuwait: Kuwait … has been less inclined to take action against Kuwait-based financiers and facilitators plotting attacks outside of Kuwait.