Title: Justice and Fairness - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
Headings: Justice and Fairness
Justice and Fairness
Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer
Also on Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
Smart Lampposts: Illuminating Smart …
Cultural (In)sensitivity in Opinion Pieces
Anonymizing Undocumented …
Ethics is the Act of Seeing
Vaccines for the Military Affect …
Five (Subtle) Types of Misinformation in …
Seeing Creation Aright: Christianity and …
How Newsweek Missed the Circular …
Mahjabeen Malik • 1 year ago
Clíona Walshe • 3 years ago
Sal Sutcliffe • 1 month ago
Eddie Goodman • 3 years ago

Content: There have, however, also been more distinct understandings of the two terms. While justice usually has been used with reference to a standard of rightness, fairness often has been used with regard to an ability to judge without reference to one's feelings or interests; fairness has also been used to refer to the ability to make judgments that are not overly general but that are concrete and specific to a particular case. In any case, a notion of being treated as one deserves is crucial to both justice and fairness. When people differ over what they believe should be given, or when decisions have to be made about how benefits and burdens should be distributed among a group of people, questions of justice or fairness inevitably arise. In fact, most ethicists today hold the view that there would be no point of talking about justice or fairness if it were not for the conflicts of interest that are created when goods and services are scarce and people differ over who should get what. When such conflicts arise in our society, we need principles of justice that we can all accept as reasonable and fair standards for determining what people deserve. But saying that justice is giving each person what he or she deserves does not take us very far. How do we determine what people deserve? What criteria and what principles should we use to determine what is due to this or that person?