Title: Should There Be Limits on Free Speech | Rights | Constitution USA | PBS
Headings: Should There Be Limits on Freedom of Speech?
Should There Be Limits on Freedom of Speech?
Darwin McDuck • 4 years ago
eric23443219091@gmail.com • 4 years ago
Jaycee Griffith • 3 years ago
Andrew Sprague • 4 years ago
college student • 5 years ago
Mr.NiceDragon • 6 years ago
Andrew Sprague • 4 years ago
Darwin McDuck • 4 years ago
Darwin McDuck • 4 years ago
Darwin McDuck • 4 years ago
Darwin McDuck • 4 years ago

Content: A society in which provocative speech could be punished would be a society without controversial politics, or art, or ideas. It would be a society in which citizens feared expressing dissident thoughts. In short, it would be a society wholly alien to America’s founders who, after all, had some pretty provocative ideas of their own. - Ben Wizner is director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Speech, Privacy & Technology Project. Disqus Comments
We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide. bobbknight • 7 years ago
Should there be limits on freedom of speech. We already have limits on freedom of speech, limits imposed by mass media, unions, political and so called philanthropic organizations. Speech is a crime when directed against actions or views of the protected, which today is everyone but a white male over the age of 30. Look what happened to a black man, a celebrated man, a famous surgeon who saves the lives of children.