; and (II) has otherwise met all of the requirements for submission of the application. (ii) Error made by the Department In the case of evidence of error by the Department or an agent of the Department, other than a peer reviewer, the Secretary shall review any evidence submitted by the applicant and provide a timely response to the applicant. All applicants, regardless of score, shall have this right of review. If the Secretary determines that an error was made by the Department or an agent of the Department, other than a peer reviewer, the Secretary shall correct the error and accordingly adjust the applicant score. (iii) Error made by a peer reviewer (I) In general In the case of evidence of error by a peer reviewer, a secondary review panel shall automatically and promptly evaluate the application for consideration in the applicable grant competition upon receipt of a request by any such applicant. The Department shall allow this right of review to any applicant that scored five points or less below the cut-off score. Examples of errors warranting secondary review may include— (aa) points withheld for criteria not required in statute, regulation, or guidance governing a program under this chapter or the application for a grant for such program; or (bb) information pertaining to selection criteria that was incorrectly determined to be missing from an application. (II) Timely review and replacement score The secondary review panel described in subclause (I) shall conduct a secondary review in a timely fashion, and the score resulting from the secondary review shall replace the score from the initial peer review. (III) Composition of secondary review panel The secondary review panel shall be composed of reviewers each of whom— (aa) did not review the application in the original peer review; (bb) is a member of the cohort of peer reviewers for the grant program that is the subject of such secondary review