; (2) identify lessons learned during the period described in subsection (a) with respect to— (A) the implications of offshore aquaculture type, location, and regulatory framework on the success of offshore aquaculture projects; (B) the degree of involvement of coastal or adjacent States, Tribal groups, underserved communities, or communities with environmental justice concerns in consultation, planning, or operations of offshore aquaculture operations; (C) safety protocols and risk mitigation measures for the permit and oversight processes for offshore aquaculture, including— (i) escape prevention measures; (ii) emergency event response planning; (iii) compliance monitoring, particularly in remote locations; (iv) compliance with Federal laws; (v) reporting mechanisms to appropriate Federal authorities; and (vi) vessel navigation aids to ensure navigational safety; (D) the effect of incentives to reduce adverse effects or disparate impacts from offshore aquaculture operations; (E) building and optimizing synergies between offshore aquaculture and wild-caught fishing activities, or offshore, nearshore, and onshore aquaculture activities, including market development, increasing seafood consumption, and shared infrastructure; (F) the environmental effects of offshore aquaculture operations, including mechanisms to prevent harm to the environment, wildlife, or human well-being; (G) in consultation with the Council Coordination Committee, the net economic and social benefits of offshore aquaculture projects, particularly for nearby communities, including underserved communities and communities with environmental justice concerns, based on project size, regulatory structures, and financing structures; (H) the impact of introducing offshore aquaculture products to the marketplace on supply and demand for wild-capture fisheries products, and methods for ensuring resiliency and growth for both offshore aquaculture and wild-capture fisheries products