; (D) the effectiveness of the various education program’s length, and the value of credentials or degrees earned with different credit length; (E) the variance of different doses or credit length by educational program; (F) the models of instruction, curriculum, and other characteristics of program delivery that are most effective in a correctional environment; (G) challenges in providing programs and courses in the prison settings; (H) how such challenges were addressed; (I) suggestions for the agency to assist in addressing such challenges; (J) impacts on the environment and safety of the correctional facility; (K) average and projected costs, overall and per student, of the programs and courses offered by the eligible provider; (L) student demographic data, including age, gender, race, ethnicity, and security or custody level; and (M) other relevant data. (f) Evaluation (1) In general The Assistant Director, in coordination with the National Institute of Justice, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Corrections, and the Secretary of Education, shall conduct an evaluation of the Program that assesses— (A) in-custody outcomes, including impacts on tickets, segregation, program participation outside of education, and continued enrollment in the Program; (B) post-release outcomes of the Program, including— (i) postsecondary enrollment and continuance of education by eligible students after release; (ii) degree attainment from an institution of higher education; (iii) progress toward a degree in credits or time; (iv) continued participation in educational programs after release; (v) factors related to the pursuit of education, such as housing attainment; and (vi) other relevant factors; (C) the impact of the Program on safety in correctional facilities; (D) the demand for participation in the Program, including the size of waiting lists; (E) employment outcomes of participants in the Program; (F) the impact of the Program on recidivism