; (H) discount future benefits and costs quantified and monetized under subparagraph (G); (I) to the maximum extent practicable, evaluate non-quantified and non-monetized benefits and costs of the selected regulatory alternative and the available alternatives under consideration; and (J) characterize any uncertainty in benefits, costs, and net benefits. (c) Cumulative regulatory burden In considering the cumulative regulatory burden under subsection (b)(5), an agency shall— (1) identify and assess the benefits and costs of other regulations require compliance by the same regulated entities to attempt to achieve similar regulatory objectives; (2) evaluate whether the rule is inconsistent with, incompatible with, or duplicative of other regulations; and (3) consider whether the estimated benefits and costs of the rule increase or decrease as a result of other regulations issued by the agency, including regulations that are not yet fully implemented, compared to the benefits and costs of that rule in the absence of such regulations. (d) Less burdensome alternatives If, after conducting an analysis under subsection (a) for a proposed rule that is likely to lead to a significant rule, or a final rule or interim final that is a significant rule, the agency selects a regulatory approach that is not the least burdensome compared to an available regulatory alternative, the agency shall include— (1) in the summary section of the preamble a statement that the selected approach is more burdensome than an available regulatory alternative