; (iii) quality of deliverables in terms of end users’ satisfaction with a delivered product or provided service; and (iv) end user satisfaction with the degree and nature of collaboration between the end user and the relevant procurement officials; (4) illustrate how senior procurement executives can use the quantitative outcome-oriented contracting metrics and goals required under paragraph (3) to— (A) assess the performance of procurement organizations on an ongoing basis; (B) identify and share leading practices that Heads of Contracting Activity and other procurement officials can use to achieve desired contracting outcomes; (C) evaluate key factors affecting contracting outcomes, including— (i) collaboration with key stakeholders, particularly requirements generators, pre- and post-contract award; and (ii) contractor performance; and (5) assess the benefits and drawbacks of leveraging various data sources when establishing and using the outcome-oriented contracting metrics and goals required under paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively, including, at a minimum— (A) data stored in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System