; or (C) the personnel action was required by statute or an order from a court of competent jurisdiction. . (b) Applicability to detailees Subsection (a) of section 1104 of such Act ( 50 U.S.C. 3234 ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (5) Employee The term employee , with respect to an agency or a covered intelligence community element, includes an individual who has been detailed to such agency or covered intelligence community element. . (c) Harmonization of enforcement Subsection (g) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(2) of this section, is amended to read as follows: (g) Enforcement (1) In general Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the President shall provide for the enforcement of this section. (2) Harmonization with other enforcement To the fullest extent possible, the President shall provide for enforcement of this section in a manner that is consistent with the enforcement of section 2302(b)(8) of title 5, United States Code, especially with respect to policies and procedures used to adjudicate alleged violations of such section. . 603. Establishing process parity for adverse security clearance and access determinations Subparagraph (C) of section 3001(j)(4) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 ( 50 U.S.C. 3341(j)(4) ) is amended to read as follows: (C) Contributing factor (i) In general Subject to clause (iii), in determining whether the adverse security clearance or access determination violated paragraph (1), the agency shall find that paragraph (1) was violated if the individual has demonstrated that a disclosure described in paragraph (1) was a contributing factor in the adverse security clearance or access determination taken against the individual. (ii) Circumstantial evidence An individual under clause (i) may demonstrate that the disclosure was a contributing factor in the adverse security clearance or access determination taken against the individual through circumstantial evidence, such as evidence that— (I) the official