; Whereas current oversight work of the 118th Congress does evidence that this pattern of abuses, in particular by the FBI, are not incidental, but rather a pattern of behavior warranting the sunset of section 702; Whereas even FISC Judge James E. Boasberg in a 2018 ruling observed that a large number of [702] queries evidence[ed] a misunderstanding of the querying standard—or indifference toward it ; Whereas numerous American intelligence, law enforcement, academic, and civil liberties groups have expressed sustained concern over the law and practice of section 702 collection; Whereas there is no indication that traditional FISA authorizations, requiring a warrant, are not up to the task of protecting American national security while also protecting American civil liberties; Whereas traditional FISA authorities are more protective of American civil liberties, including— (1) by requiring close involvement of article III judges; (2) by requiring approval both of the Attorney General and a judge; (3) by requiring an attestation that ordinary methods of information collection would not work, prior to having a warrant approved; and (4) by having time limits on surveillance; and Whereas no government component has ever provided evidence that section 702 has produced better outcomes than traditional FISA: Now, therefore, be it