; (bb) is a member of the cohort of peer reviewers for the grant program that is the subject of such secondary review; and (cc) to the extent practicable, has conducted peer reviews in not less than 2 previous competitions for the grant program that is the subject of such secondary review. (IV) Final score The final peer review score of an application subject to a secondary review under this clause shall promptly be adjusted appropriately using the score awarded by the secondary review panel, so as not to interfere with the timely awarding of grants for the applicable grant competition. (iv) Finality (I) In general A determination by the Secretary under clause (ii) shall not be reviewable by any officer or employee of the Department other than the Secretary. (II) Scoring The score awarded by a secondary review panel under clause (iii) shall not be reviewable by any officer or employee of the Department other than the Secretary. (v) Funding of applications with certain adjusted scores Applications with scores that are adjusted upward under clause (ii) or (iii) that equal or exceed the minimum cut-off score for the applicable grant competition shall be funded by the Secretary using general or administrative funds available to the Secretary other than those funds appropriated or allocated for the programs authorized by this chapter. . (c) Outreach Section 402A(d)(3) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1070a–11(d)(3) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: The Secretary shall also host at least one virtual, interactive training using telecommunications technology to ensure that interested applicants have access to technical assistance. . (d) Documentation of status as a low-Income individual Section 402A(e) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1070a–11(e) ) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking or after the semicolon; (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon