; (II) a review of the cost-benefit analysis methodologies and discount rates used by represented agencies for all Federal investments, including a review of the implications of those methodologies and discount rates for adaptation and resilience; and (III) recommendations to improve the methodologies described in subclause (II) to reflect— (aa) the added value of pre-disaster mitigation, resilience planning, and construction methodologies over the lifetime of a project or unit of infrastructure; (bb) the benefits of natural infrastructure investments and nature-based solutions; (cc) the potential value of retreat and relocation as adaptation solutions; and (dd) to what extent existing cost-benefit analysis methodologies lead to inequitable outcomes or outcomes that increase climate vulnerability. (v) Information relating to community considerations, including strategies for— (I) ensuring that the costs, benefits, and risks resulting from resilience efforts, including funding allocations, the methodologies for determining funding allocations, and existing and future policies, are equitably distributed among sectors of society, types of communities, and geographies; (II) ensuring that federally supported resilience efforts are— (aa) designed in consultation with the communities that will be affected by those efforts; and (bb) centered on the needs of those communities; and (III) to the greatest extent practicable, integrating equity considerations across all aspects of the Strategy. (2) Implementation plan Concurrently with the Strategy and each update of the Strategy, the Chief Resilience Officer shall submit to the President and Congress an Implementation Plan that describes how represented agencies intend to carry out the Strategy, which shall include— (A) a description of the roles and responsibilities of each represented agency in carrying out each element of the Strategy described in paragraph (1)