; and (II) the coastal State’s concurrence (or presumed concurrence) or objection to the consistency certification for the offshore aquaculture permit under section 307(c)(3)(A) of such Act shall apply both— (aa) to the offshore aquaculture permit; and (bb) to any related modification or change to a lessee’s plan approved under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act ( 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq. ). (B) State review under section 307(c)(3)(B) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 To the extent that a coastal State is not authorized by section 307(c)(3)(A) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 ( 16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3)(A) ) to review an offshore aquaculture permit application submitted under this Act, then a modification or change to a lessee’s approved plan shall be subject to coastal State review under section 307(c)(3)(B) of such Act if a consistency certification for the modification or change is required under applicable Federal regulations. (C) Definitions In this paragraph: (i) Lessee’s approved plan The term lessee’s approved plan includes a document for which a consistency certification is required under applicable Federal regulations, such as a change to the approved plan for decommissioning a facility. (ii) Offshore aquaculture permit applicant The term offshore aquaculture permit applicant means an applicant for an offshore aquaculture permit under this section that— (I) will locate the proposed facility in an area that would require consent from the lessee as described in paragraph (2)