; and (III) interim waste storage and related issues. (xvi) Decommissioning analysis for the advanced nuclear reactor, including the cost of decommissioning the advanced nuclear reactor, and the environmental impact of decommissioning the advanced nuclear reactor. (2) Other considerations The Architect of the Capitol may incorporate in the study the following additional considerations: (A) How retrofitting the Capitol Power Plant would affect other Federal and District of Columbia laws, including the Clean Air Act, and what would be needed in terms of regulatory clarity and licensing to retrofit the Plant with an advanced nuclear reactor. (B) Economic considerations relating to how the retrofitted power plant compares with the current combined heat and power natural gas-fired co-generation system, as well as how the retrofitted Plant compares with Plant when it was powered by coal and an analysis of how much retrofitting the plant with an advanced nuclear reactor would save the Federal Government and the American taxpayer annually. (C) How such feasibility would impact the utility energy service contract between the Architect of the Capitol and the local utility, including potential Federal funding opportunities to pay off the utility energy service contract before the May 2037 anticipated timeline. (D) How local power outages currently affect the Plant, and how the power outage impacts could be alleviated from retrofitting the Plant with an advanced nuclear reactor. (E) The potential for the retrofitted Plant to once again provide electricity, along with steam and chilled water, to the Capitol Complex, and how this would benefit the Complex in terms of grid security and protection against cyberattacks and digital data infiltration efforts. (F) How retrofitting the Plant to incorporate an advanced nuclear reactor would fit within the Greening the Capitol Initiative , which was created in March 2007 to provide an environmentally responsible and healthy working environment for employees . (G) How the retrofitted