; (ii) a description of the evidence-based practices and procedures used by the agencies to carry out the activities described in subclauses (I) through (III) of subparagraph (A)(iii); and (iii) an analysis of the effects of such practices and procedures, including information regarding— (I) the collection of data related to individual children; (II) aggregate data related to the eligible children population, including— (aa) characteristics of children excluded from juvenile adjudication by age (under age of 12 and over the age of 15 years old), child survivors of commercial sexual exploitation, dual status youth (children in both foster care and juvenile justice systems), and cross over children (children that cross between the foster care and juvenile justice systems) in the State; (bb) case processing timelines; and (cc) information related to case management, the provision of targeted services, and placements within the foster care or juvenile justice system; and (III) the extent to which such practices and procedures have contributed to— (aa) higher educational attainment for any eligible children; (bb) fewer delinquency referrals for children excluded from juvenile adjudication by age (under age of 12 and over the age of 15 years old), child survivors of commercial sexual exploitation, dual status youth (children in both foster care and juvenile justice systems), and cross over children (children that cross between the foster care and juvenile justice systems); (cc) shorter stays in intensive restrictive placements for children excluded from juvenile adjudication by age (under age of 12 and over the age of 15 years old), child survivors of commercial sexual exploitation, dual status youth (children in both foster care and juvenile justice systems), and cross over children (children that cross between the foster care and juvenile justice systems)