Archer admitted that Burisma would have likely gone out of business had it not been for the Biden brand being attached to it. He also testified that Biden was routinely put on conference calls with Hunter Biden’s foreign associates to “sell the brand”. Article II: Obstruction of Justice According to testimony from IRS whistleblowers, members of the Biden campaign colluded with Justice Department (DOJ) officials to improperly interfere with investigations into tax crimes alleged to have been committed by Hunter Biden. These acts constitute an abuse of power as well as Obstruction of Justice, 18 U.S.C. 1505 , 1510, 1512. (1) After Joe Biden became the presumptive Democrat Nominee in 2020, career DOJ officials began stalling the Hunter Biden investigations in Delaware. This continued into the Biden Administration. (2) DOJ took unusual steps such as removing Hunter Biden’s name from warrants and court filings. (3) DOJ refused to pursue search warrants or evidence contained at Joe Biden’s guest house. (4) DOJ refused to pursue search warrants in general against Hunter Biden even though legal requirements had been met. (5) FBI and IRS agents prepared for interviews with multiple subjects including Hunter Biden on December 8, 2020. These were to be unannounced interviews where the agents showed up and asked questions if the subjects were willing to answer. FBI or DOJ officials tipped off the Biden transition team. As a result, Hunter Biden’s attorney became involved and most of the interviews did not proceed as planned. (6) DOJ made decisions relating to formal actions, such as venue and filing charges, and related to internal review processes that were out of the ordinary during the Hunter Biden case. The IRS whistleblower indicated these actions were unlike actions taken in any other case he had worked on. He indicated that these unusual steps all began after Biden became the presumptive 2020 Democrat nominee. Article III: Fraud James Biden recruited “investors” for business ventures that ultimately failed. There is