; or (II) include such report in the annual report under clause (i) for such year. (B) Review (i) Criteria The State educational agency, in coordination with the Advisory Board, shall review the annual report submitted under subparagraph (A)(i) for such year and make a determination with respect to whether the tutoring programs carried out by such local educational agency are improving the academic achievement and recovery of students, as defined by each State educational agency’s academic standards pursuant to section 1111 of part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq. ). (ii) Determination If the State educational agency, in coordination with the Advisory Board, makes a determination under clause (i) that such tutoring programs are— (I) improving such student outcomes, the State educational agency shall make available to the local educational agency the annual allocation for such year; or (II) not improving such student outcomes, the State educational agency shall direct the local educational agency to submit an updated plan in accordance with subparagraph (C). (C) Resubmission (i) Updated plan (I) In general If the State educational agency, in coordination with the Advisory Board, makes a determination under subparagraph (B)(ii)(II) that such tutoring programs are not improving such student outcomes, the local educational agency shall, not later than 3 months after the date of the submission of the annual plan under subparagraph (A)(i)— (aa) create an updated plan that— (AA) indicates how the design of such tutoring programs will be changed to improve such student outcomes; and (BB) does not change the distribution of individual schools or individual grade levels that receive subgrant funding from the local educational agencies, except for withdrawing funding from programs whose resubmitted plan is deemed to not improve student outcomes pursuant to subsection (c)(ii)(II)(bb)