; (ii) identifying the information described in clause (i) that was not submitted; and (iii) including a citation to a specific provision of a publicly available rule, regulation, or standard issued by the franchising authority requiring that such information be submitted with such a request. (D) Limitation on subsequent written notice If a written notice provided by a franchising authority to a requesting party under subparagraph (A) with respect to a supplemental submission identifies as not having been submitted any information that was not identified as not having been submitted in the prior written notice under this subparagraph in response to which the supplemental submission was submitted, the subsequent written notice shall be treated as not having been provided to the requesting party. (6) Tolling by mutual agreement The timeframe under paragraph (1) may be tolled by mutual agreement between the franchising authority and the requesting party. (7) Written decision and record Any decision by a franchising authority to deny a request for a franchise shall be— (A) in writing; (B) supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record; and (C) publicly released, and provided to the requesting party, on the same day such decision is made. (8) When request considered submitted For the purposes of this subsection, a request to a franchising authority shall be considered submitted on the date on which the requesting party takes the first procedural step within the control of the requesting party— (A) to submit such request in accordance with the procedures established by the franchising authority for the review and approval of such a request