; or (2) has a reasonable basis to believe that the person’s rights have been, are being, or imminently will be violated by an individual acting under color of Federal law. (c) Reasonable basis For the purposes of this section, a reasonable basis exists when the person demonstrates a concrete injury arising from a good-faith belief that the person’s rights have been, are being, or imminently will be violated through the acquisition, copying, querying, retention, access, or use of the person’s information under this Act or pursuant to any other authority of the executive branch of the Federal Government. (d) State secrets privilege abrogated The state secrets privilege is abrogated, and the procedure set forth in section 106(f) shall apply, with respect to any claim where the plaintiff, who is a United States person or person located in the United States, plausibly alleges an injury-in-fact relating to the acquisition, copying, querying, retention, access, or use of information acquired under this Act or pursuant to another authority of the executive branch of the Federal Government and plausibly alleges that the acquisition, copying, querying, retention, access, or use of information violates the Constitution or laws of the United States. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as amended by section 202, is further amended by adding at the end the following: Title X—ADDITIONAL MATTERS Sec. 1001. Challenges to Government surveillance. . 211. Accountability procedures for violations by Federal employees (a) In general Title X of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 ( 50 U.S.C. 1881 et seq. ), as added by this title, is amended by adding at the end the following: 1002. Accountability procedures for violations by Federal employees (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees of Congress The term appropriate committees of Congress has the meaning given such term in section 101. (2) Covered agency The term covered agency means the