; and (B) provide greater predictability and clarity, with respect to such process, to small, medium, and large businesses, including information relating to the timeline for testing and evaluation. (13) An assessment of the privacy and security impact on border communities of security-related technology. (14) In the case of a new acquisition leading to the removal of equipment from a port of entry along the northern or southern border of the United States, a strategy to consult with industry and community stakeholders affected by such removal. (15) A strategy to consult with industry and community stakeholders with respect to security impacts at a port of entry described in paragraph (14). (c) Leveraging the private sector To the extent practicable, the plan shall— (1) leverage to the greatest extent possible emerging technological trends, and research and development trends, within the public and private sectors; (2) incorporate input from the private sector, including from border and port security stakeholders, through requests for information, industry day events, and other innovative means consistent with the Federal Acquisition Regulation; and (3) identify security-related technologies that are in development or deployed, with or without adaptation, that may satisfy the mission needs of CBP. (d) Form To the extent practicable, the plan shall be published in unclassified form on the website of the Department. (e) Approval The Commissioner may not publish the plan until the plan is approved by the Secretary. (f) Disclosure The plan shall include a list of the names of individuals not employed by the Federal Government who contributed to the development of the plan. (g) Update and report Not later than the date that is two years after the date on which the plan is submitted to the appropriate congressional committees pursuant to subsection (a) and biennially thereafter for ten years, the Commissioner shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees— (1) an update of the plan, if appropriate