; (B) the feasibility, benefits, costs, and technological needs of incorporating facility system data into existing emergency alert systems; (C) whether local emergency management organizations may need additional hardware, software, personnel, or communications support to incorporate a localized emergency alert system into an existing emergency alert system; (D) whether other systems could support notification to the public of an incident or accident at a covered facility, such as the National Response Center, the Reverse-911 telecommunication system, or severe weather warning systems; and (E) whether localized emergency alert systems have been considered, studied, or implemented in other high hazard industries, such as industrial gases, chemicals, petrochemicals, and petroleum refining, and the results of any study or implementation of such systems in such industries; (3) consult with owners and operators of large and small covered facilities, public safety advocacy groups, and urban and rural State and local emergency management officials; (4) assess the adequacy of existing practices of owners and operators of covered facilities in providing timely and pertinent safety communication about an incident or accident at such facility to local communities affected by such incident or accident; (5) assess whether there are legal hurdles to establishing a localized emergency alert system that uses voluntarily collected data or opt-in procedures, including any data security considerations; (6) consider the feasibility, benefits, costs, and other impacts to State and Federal safety regulators who would oversee any requirement of owners and operators of covered facilities; (7) assess the types of incidents and accidents at covered facilities, by commodities transported and the unique characteristics of such incident or accident, that should be reported through a localized emergency alert system and the content of the information that should be provided