; or (ii) at least a 10 percent reduction in energy or water use of the covered product. (D) Criteria related to performance The Secretary may not determine that imposition of an energy conservation standard is economically justified unless the Secretary determines that imposition of such energy conservation standard will not result in any lessening of the utility or the performance of the applicable covered product, taking into consideration the effects of such energy conservation standard on— (i) the compatibility of the covered product with existing systems; (ii) the life span of the covered product; (iii) the operating conditions of the covered product; (iv) the duty cycle, charging time, and run time of the covered product, as applicable; (v) the maintenance requirements of the covered product; and (vi) the replacement and disposal requirements for the covered product. (E) Criteria related to market competition and price discrimination The Secretary may not determine that imposition of an energy conservation standard is economically justified unless the Secretary determines that imposition of the energy conservation standard is not likely to result in— (i) any lessening of market competition; or (ii) price discrimination. (F) Technological innovation The Secretary may not determine that imposition of an energy conservation standard is economically justified unless the Secretary determines that imposition of such energy conservation standard is not likely to result in the unavailability in the United States of a type (or class) of products based on what type of fuel the product consumes. (G) Other considerations In determining whether imposition of an energy conservation standard is economically justified, the Secretary— (i) shall prioritize the interests of consumers; (ii) may not consider estimates of the social costs or social benefits associated with incremental greenhouse gas emissions