; (BB) the notification was incomplete; or (CC) the notification was duplicative under subsection (c)(2)(C)(i); and (II) did not file a timely petition to contest the notification with the Board under paragraph (2); or (ii) a provider is hosting a proscribed visual depiction relating to a child, does not have a designated reporting system, and the complainant was unable to serve a notification on the provider under this subsection despite reasonable efforts. (B) Additional claim As applicable, a petition filed under subparagraph (A) may also claim that the proscribed visual depiction relating to a child at issue in the petition involves recidivist hosting. (C) Timeframe (i) In general A petition under this paragraph shall be considered timely if it is filed within 30 days of the applicable start date, as defined under clause (ii). (ii) Applicable start date For purposes of clause (i), the term applicable start date means— (I) in the case of a petition under subparagraph (A)(i) claiming that the visual depiction was not removed or that the provider made an incorrect claim relating to the visual depiction or notification, the day that the provider's option to file a petition has expired under paragraph (2)(B)