; (ii) provides the cable operator a reasonable opportunity to cure such failure, after which the cable operator fails to cure such failure; and (iii) does not waive the material requirement or acquiesce with the failure to substantially meet such requirement. (c) Review of revocation of franchise by franchising authority (1) Administrative or judicial review With respect to a determination by a franchising authority to revoke a franchise under subsection (b)(2)(B), a cable operator may— (A) petition the Commission for review of such determination; or (B) seek judicial review of such determination pursuant to the provisions of section 635. (2) Commission review With respect to a petition for the review of a determination brought under paragraph (1)(A), the Commission shall— (A) review the determination de novo; and (B) invalidate the determination if, based on the evidence presented during the review, the Commission determines that the franchising authority has not demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the franchising authority revoked the franchise in accordance with subsection (b)(2)(B). (3) Stay of determination to revoke franchise A revocation of a franchise under subsection (b)(2)(B) may be stayed— (A) in the case the cable operator petitions the Commission for review of the determination on which such revocation is based, by the Commission; and (B) in the case the cable operator seeks judicial review of the determination on which such revocation is based, by the court in which the cable operator seeks judicial review of the determination. . (c) Technical and conforming amendments The Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. ) is amended— (1) in section 601— (A) in paragraph (4), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting ; and ; (B) by striking paragraph (5); and (C) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (5); (2) in section 602(9)— (A) by striking initial