; and (2) the court finds that such living person or related entity— (A) is not able to obtain in personam jurisdiction over a person who would have been a defendant in a civil action in section 1041 of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 2 of this Act; or (B) through reasonable due diligence was not able to find a person who would have been a defendant in a civil action under paragraph (1) by— (i) if practicable, sending a notice of the alleged violation and intent to proceed under this paragraph to the producer of the record; (ii) publishing notice of the action as the court may direct promptly after filing the action; and (iii) complying with such other due diligence measures the Attorney General promulgates through regulation. (b) Service of process The actions under subsection (a)(2)(B)(ii) shall constitute service of process. (c) Jurisdiction In an in rem action under this section, an advanced false personation record shall be deemed to have its situs in the judicial district in which the person falsely depicted as engaging in material activity resides. (d) Remedies The remedies in an in rem action under this section shall be limited to— (1) a court order declaring there to be a substantial likelihood that the material activity depicted in such advanced technological false personation record is false and lacking the digital content provenance and disclosures required under section 1041 of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 2 of this Act