; (ii) provide the most protective level of control over safety by default; and (iii) adapt recommendation systems to mitigate reasonably foreseeable risk of harms to minors, as described in section 102(a); (D) a description of internal processes for handling reports and automated detection mechanisms for harms to minors, including the rate, timeliness, and effectiveness of responses under the requirement of section 103(c); (E) the status of implementing prevention and mitigation measures identified in prior assessments; and (F) a description of the additional measures to be taken by the covered platform to address the circumvention of safeguards for minors and parental tools. (d) Reasonable inspection In conducting an inspection of the reasonably foreseeable risk of harm to minors under this section, an independent, third-party auditor shall— (1) take into consideration the function of personalized recommendation systems; (2) consult parents and youth experts, including youth and families with relevant past or current experience, public health and mental health nonprofit organizations, health and development organizations, and civil society with respect to the prevention of harms to minors; (3) conduct research based on experiences of minors that use the covered platform, including reports under section 103(c) and information provided by law enforcement; (4) take account of research, including research regarding design features, marketing, or product integrity, industry best practices, or outside research; (5) consider indicia or inferences of age of users, in addition to any self-declared information about the age of users