; or (ii) the cost of obtaining representation would exceed the value of the seized property, the court may authorize or appoint counsel to represent that person with respect to the claim. ; (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting or appoint after authorize ; and (C) in paragraph (2)(A)— (i) by striking in a judicial civil forfeiture proceeding and inserting in a civil forfeiture proceeding ; (ii) by inserting under paragraph (1) after counsel ; (iii) by striking , and the property subject to forfeiture is real property that is being used by the person as a primary residence, ; and (iv) by striking , at the request of the person, shall insure and inserting shall ensure ; (3) in subsection (c)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking a preponderance of the evidence and inserting clear and convincing evidence ; (B) in paragraph (2), by striking a preponderance of the evidence and inserting clear and convincing evidence ; and (C) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following: (3) if the Government's theory of forfeiture is that the property was used to commit or facilitate the commission of a criminal offense, or was involved in the commission of a criminal offense, the Government shall establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that— (A) there was a substantial connection between the property and the offense; and (B) the owner of any interest in the seized property— (i) used the property with intent to facilitate the offense; or (ii) knowingly consented or was willfully blind to the use of the property by another in connection with the offense. ; (4) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: The Government shall have the burden of proving that the claimant is not an innocent owner by a preponderance of the evidence. ; and (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking an owner who and all that follows through upon learning and inserting an owner who, upon learning