; Hicklin v. Orbeck, 437 U.S. 518, 525 (1978); Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179, 200 (1973) (citing Ward v. Maryland, 79 U.S. 418 (1870)); Chalker v. Birmingham & N.W.Ry. Co., 249 U.S. 522, 527 (1919); Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 52, 53 (1920)). (6) Since the 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., 142 S. Ct. 2228 (2022), State legislatures have proposed and enacted legislation attempting to interfere with the ability to travel for reproductive health care. 3. Freedom of travel (a) Prohibited conduct It shall be unlawful for any person or government to— (1) restrict or in any way sanction, hold liable, discriminate against, or otherwise disadvantage any individual from traveling to another State to receive or provide reproductive health care that is legal in that State; (2) restrict or in any way sanction, hold liable, discriminate against, or otherwise disadvantage any individual, entity, or organization from assisting an individual in traveling to another State to receive or provide reproductive health care that is legal in that State; (3) deny any right, benefit, or privilege to an individual, entity, or organization as retaliation for another person’s travel to another State to receive or provide reproductive health care that is legal in that State