1. Short titles This Act may be cited as the Stop Helping Outcome Preferences Act or the SHOP Act . 2. Nationwide injunction abuse prevention (a) In general Chapter 85 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 1370. Limitation on authority to provide injunctive relief Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a district court may not issue any order providing injunctive relief unless such order is applicable only to— (1) the parties to the case before the court; or (2) similarly situated individuals in the judicial district in which the district court has jurisdiction. . (b) Clerical amendment The chapter analysis for chapter 84 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 1370. Limitation on authority to provide injunctive relief. . 3. Preventing judge shopping (a) In general Chapter 131 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2075 the following: 2076. Preventing judge shopping (a) In general Rules promulgated under this chapter may not permit an attorney to be admitted to practice in any Federal court if a disciplinary body of judges properly constituted under the rules and procedures of a Federal court determines that such attorney has engaged in judge shopping. (b) Defined term In this section, the term judge shopping means attempting to interfere with a court’s case assignment process for the purpose of influencing the assignment of a particular judge to preside over a particular case by— (1) engaging in ex parte communications with a judge or a judge’s chambers; (2) successive filing of materially identical suits within a State, district, or circuit without good cause; (3) successive filing of materially identical suits with different plaintiffs; (4) improperly marking a suit as a related case under existing court docketing practices