to the removal of 4 dams that have produced renewable energy for over a century. (9) The removal of dams has been funded in substantial part by electric rate payers, including irrigation water users, in Oregon and California, who also are burdened with the cost of paying for replacement power. (10) The removal of dams has also led indirectly to other significant public costs that would not have been incurred absent the removal of hydroelectric generation. (11) The removal of hydroelectric generation on the Klamath River is expected to result in the availability of 425 miles of habitat for anadromous fish that is not currently accessible. (12) Commitments have been made to agricultural communities to the effect that dam removal and restoration activities will not cause new burdens for those communities and, in fact, that those communities will benefit significantly, but those commitments have either not been kept or lack the necessary assurances that they will be met in the future. (13) It is appropriate and fair to take measures to stabilize conditions for agricultural communities in the Klamath Basin that have been at the center of conflict and to whom important commitments have been made in connection with extraordinary actions taken by the United States that affect their interests. (14) This Act will increase such stability while not adversely affecting other interests in the Klamath Basin. 3. Klamath project water and power (a) Addressing water, power, and facilities management for irrigation Section 4 of the Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2000 ( Public Law 106–498 ) is amended— (1) in subsection (b), by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows: (1) In general Subject to appropriations and required environmental reviews, the Secretary is authorized to carry out activities, including entering into a contract or making financial assistance available through cooperative agreements or other methods, to plan, implement, and administer voluntary programs, including conservation and efficiency