; (B) each giant sequoia grove that is at high risk of experiencing a stand-replacing disturbance; (C) lands located near giant sequoia groves that are at risk of experiencing high-severity wildfires that could adversely impact such giant sequoia groves; and (D) each giant sequoia grove that has experienced a disturbance and is unlikely to naturally regenerate and is in need of reforestation; (2) analyzes the resiliency of each giant sequoia grove to threats, such as— (A) high-severity wildfire; (B) insects, including beetle kill; and (C) drought; (3) with respect to Protection Projects, proposes a list of highest priority Protection Projects to be carried out under section 6, giving priority to projects located on lands identified under subparagraphs (B) and (C) of subsection (a)(1); (4) examines how historical, Tribal, or current approaches to wildland fire suppression and forest management activities across various jurisdictions have impacted the health and resiliency of giant sequoia groves with respect to— (A) high-severity wildfires; (B) insects, including beetle kill; and (C) drought; and (5) includes program and policy recommendations that address— (A) Federal and State policies that impede activities to improve the health and resiliency of giant sequoias and proposed policy changes to address such impediments; (B) new Federal and State policies necessary to increase the pace and scale of treatments that improve the health and resiliency of giant sequoias; (C) options to enhance communication, coordination, and collaboration, particularly for cross-boundary projects, to improve the health and resiliency of giant sequoias