; or (B) if the algorithmic process does produce a disparate outcome as described in the assessment conducted under section 4(a)(2)(A)(iv), any such disparate outcome is justified by a non-discriminatory, compelling interest, and such interest cannot be satisfied by less discriminatory means. (3) Effective For purposes of paragraph (1), an algorithmic process is effective if the online platform employing or otherwise utilizing the algorithmic process has taken reasonable steps to ensure that the algorithmic process has the ability to produce its desired or intended result. (f) Discrimination by users of online platforms It shall be unlawful for a user of an online platform to utilize an algorithmic process on an online platform in a manner that— (1) withholds, denies, deprives, or attempts to withhold, deny, or deprive any individual of a right or privilege under title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 U.S.C. 2000a et seq. ); (2) intimidates, threatens, coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any individual with the purpose of interfering with a right or privilege under title II of such Act; or (3) punishes or attempts to punish any individual for exercising or attempting to exercise a right or privilege under title II of such Act. (g) Exceptions Nothing in this section shall limit an online platform from processing personal information for the purpose of— (1) good faith internal testing to prevent unlawful discrimination, identify disparate outcomes or treatment, or otherwise determine the extent or effectiveness of the online platform’s compliance with this Act