multiple languages and to individuals with disabilities. (2) Contents The case assignment data made available under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, and to the extent available, the case title, docket number, case origin, filing date, and name of each authoring judge, concurring judge, and dissenting judge for each opinion issued in the case. (e) Making websites user-Friendly Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall promulgate regulations requiring an evaluation of, and improvements to, the website of each district court of the United States to ensure the website is easy to understand, including that it is clear how to file a complaint relating to a judge or an employee of the district court. (f) Accessibility The Judicial Conference shall make efforts to ensure that any disclosures required under this section are made available to the public in plain language, in a variety of languages, and accessible to individuals with disabilities. 7. Oversight process for disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge Section 455 of title 28, United States Code, as amended by section 6 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following: (h) (1) Any litigant appearing before a justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States may file a petition that the justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States, as applicable, shall be disqualified based on the criteria described in subsection (b). (2) (A) Any judge or magistrate judge of the United States subject to a petition under paragraph (1) may provide a public, written response to the petition that provides a written explanation relating to any disqualification decision. (B) Any justice of the Supreme Court of the United States subject to a petition under paragraph (1) shall provide a public, written response to the petition that provides a written explanation relating to any disqualification decision. (3) If a litigant makes a petition under paragraph (1)