; relating to regulatory planning and review) and any other relevant guidance from the Office of Management and Budget; (2) be transparent, replicable, and objective; (3) describe the need to be addressed and how the rule would address that need; (4) analyze the potential effects, including the benefits and costs, of the rule; (5) to the maximum extent practicable, consider the cumulative regulatory burden on the regulated entity under subsection (c); (6) consider the potential effects on different types and sizes of businesses, if applicable; (7) for a proposed rule that is likely to lead to a significant rule, or a final or interim final rule that is a significant rule— (A) describe the need to be addressed, including— (i) the supporting information demonstrating the need; (ii) the failures of private markets that warrant new agency action, if applicable; and (iii) whether existing law, including regulations, has created or contributed to the need; (B) define the baseline for the analysis; (C) set the timeframe of the analysis; (D) analyze any available regulatory alternatives, including— (i) if rulemaking is not specifically directed by statute, the alternative of not regulating; (ii) any alternatives that specify performance objectives rather than identify or require the specific manner of compliance that regulated entities must adopt; (iii) any alternatives that involve the deployment of innovative technology or practices; and (iv) any alternatives that involve different requirements for different types or sizes of businesses, if applicable; (E) identify the effects of the available regulatory alternatives described in subparagraph (D); (F) identify the effectiveness of tort law to address the identified need; (G) to the maximum extent practicable, quantify and monetize the benefits and costs of the selected regulatory alternative and the available alternatives under consideration; (H) discount future benefits and costs quantified and monetized under subparagraph (G)