; (B) section 4(g)(3) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 ( 2 U.S.C. 933(g)(3) ); or (C) section 4001(a) of S. Con. Res. 14 (117th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2022. (2) Waiver In the Senate, an emergency designation point of order may be waived or suspended only by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. (3) Appeal In the Senate, an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on an emergency designation point of order. (b) Threshold for large budget impact for certain Congressional Budget Act of 1974 points of order (1) In general A point of order described in paragraph (3) may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. (2) Appeal In the Senate, an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order described in paragraph (3). (3) Description of large budget impact A point of order described in this paragraph is a point of order under section 302(f)(2) or 311(a)(2)(A) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 ( 2 U.S.C. 633(f)(2) , 642(a)(2)(A)) against legislation that would, within the time periods applicable to the point of order, as determined by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate, cause budget authority or outlays to exceed the applicable allocation, suballocation, level, or aggregate by more than $5,000,000,000. (c) De minimis budget impact For a violation for which the absolute value of the violation is not more than $500,000, a point of order shall not lie— (1) under the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 ( 2 U.S.C. 621 et seq. ) (except for a point of order under section 302 or 311 of such Act ( 2 U.S.C. 633 , 642))