; (II) traditional ingredients (for example, soya); and (III) other inputs; (D) potential methods and technologies to mitigate adverse effects, including the effects identified under subparagraph (C); (E) potential conflicts and solutions to mitigate such conflicts between offshore aquaculture facilities and other users of the offshore environment; (F) the types of data and qualitative information necessary for the optimal operation of such facilities and appropriate methods of procuring such data and information, including from— (i) citizen science (as defined in section 402(c) of the Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science Act ( 15 U.S.C. 3724(c) )); and (ii) the traditional offshore aquaculture knowledge of Tribal and Indigenous communities; and (G) the considerations necessary to account for the effects of climate change predictive assessments on the siting and operation of offshore aquaculture facilities; and (2) provide recommendations for legislative or administrative action with respect to— (A) methods of operation identified under paragraph (1)(A); (B) mitigating adverse effects identified under paragraph (1)(C); (C) environmental standards, control rules, or reference points that build upon the existing public and private standards for the sustainability of offshore aquaculture