; (B) how such redesign will prioritize consistent and reliable service for low-income and historically underserved communities; (C) how such redesign will prioritize connectivity to critical services and improve community livability; and (D) how the eligible entity will meaningfully consult with community, community leaders, local stakeholders and advocates, including transit advocates and disability advocates, local education agencies and institutions of higher education, community developers, labor unions, public housing agencies and workforce development boards, while facilitating such redesign. (3) A description of how the eligible entity will meaningfully partner and collaborate with community, community leaders, local stakeholders and advocates, including transit advocates and disability advocates, local education agencies and institutions of higher education, community developers, labor unions, public housing agencies and workforce development boards to support outreach efforts to increase awareness of fare-free bus and transit programs. (4) A description of the eligible entity’s equity evaluation examining any transit and mobility gaps within the current transit system and how the eligible entity plans to significantly improve these gaps, including— (A) the average commute times for driver commuters and non-driver commuters; (B) public transit ridership rates disaggregated by mode of transportation and demographic group (youth (including youth involved in the foster care system), seniors, individuals with disabilities, and low-income status); and (C) average length of bus routes and average delay times. (5) A description of the eligible entity’s current fare evasion enforcement policies, including— (A) the cost of the fine and whether the infraction is considered a civil offense or a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment; (B) the number of individuals charged with violating a fare evasion policy, disaggregated by age, race, gender, and disability status