expressed by such content. 6. Nondiscrimination, retaliation, and transparency (a) Nondiscrimination (1) Joint negotiation entities A joint negotiation entity may not discriminate against any eligible digital journalism provider based on the size of the eligible digital journalism provider or the views expressed by the eligible digital journalism provider’s content. (2) Covered platforms No covered platform may discriminate against any eligible digital journalism provider that is a member of a joint negotiation entity in connection with a negotiation conducted under section 3, or an arbitration conducted under section 4, based on the size of the eligible digital journalism provider or the views expressed by the eligible digital journalism provider’s content. (b) Prohibition on retaliation by covered platforms (1) In general No covered platform may retaliate against an eligible digital journalism provider for participating in a negotiation conducted under section 3, or an arbitration conducted under section 4, including by refusing to index content or changing the ranking, identification, modification, branding, or placement of the content of the eligible digital journalism provider on the covered platform. (2) Effect of contract provisions Any provision in an agreement that restricts an eligible digital journalism provider from receiving compensation through a negotiation conducted under section 3 or an arbitration conducted under section 4 shall be void. (c) Investing in journalism (1) In general Without disclosing confidential information regarding the pricing, terms, and conditions of an agreement reached under section 3, an agreement implementing an arbitration decision issued under section 4, or an arbitration decision issued under section 4, or confidential financial information, any eligible digital journalism provider that receives funds under or related to such agreement or arbitration decision shall provide to the Federal Trade Commission, on an annual basis, information regarding the use of any such