; (2) how existing non-tariff barriers, including regulatory practices, relatively lower labor and environmental standards, different rules for sectors ranging from agriculture and the digital economy, and standard-setting in these areas as part of existing Indo-Pacific regional and bilateral trade agreements, impact the competitiveness of American workers and businesses; (3) the impact of existing Indo-Pacific regional trade agreements on United States supply chain resiliency and connectivity, and in particular its impact on the People’s Republic of China’s role in key global supply chains; and (4) differences between the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and CPTPP, RCEP, or other regional trade agreements in the Indo-Pacific that would likely have a substantial impact on United States businesses and workers. 4. Indo-Pacific Trade Strategy Commission (a) Establishment (1) In general There is hereby established an independent commission to be known as the Indo-Pacific Trade Strategy Commission (in this section referred to as the Commission ), to develop findings and recommendations for a comprehensive trade strategy for the Indo-Pacific region for purposes of— (A) ensuring sustained United States economic and geopolitical leadership in the Indo-Pacific region; (B) promoting United States innovation, exports, and economic opportunities for workers and businesses; (C) countering the People’s Republic of China’s aggressive trade agenda; (D) promoting United States values, norms, and standards; (E) strengthening the United States economy; (F) bolstering United States economic and national security, including by addressing the vulnerabilities identified in the G7 Leaders’ Statement on Economic Resilience and Economic Security of May 20, 2023