; and (N) a comparison between the potential service secretariat leadership structures for a United States Cyber Force and the further evolution of the model described in paragraph (1) for United States Cyber Command, including establishing the United States Cyber Force within an existing military department, standing up a new military department, and evolving the service secretary-like function of the Principal Cyber Advisor in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. (3) Considerations The evaluation conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include an evaluation of how a potential United States Cyber Force dedicated to the cyber domain would compare in performance and efficacy to the current model and a further evolution of the model described in paragraph (1)(B) for United States Cyber Command, with respect to the following functions and potential objective end states, as well as an evaluation of the importance of the functions and potential end states: (A) Organizing, training, and equipping the size of a force necessary to satisfy existing and projected requirements of the Department of Defense. (B) Harmonizing training requirements and programs in support of cyberspace operations. (C) Recruiting and retaining qualified officers and enlisted members of the Armed Forces at the levels necessary to execute cyberspace operations. (D) Using reserve component forces in support of cyberspace operations. (E) Sustaining persistent force readiness. (F) Generating foundational intelligence in support of cyberspace operations. (G) Acquiring and providing cyber capabilities in support of cyberspace operations. (H) Establishing pay parity among members of the Armed Forces serving in and qualified for work roles in support of cyberspace operations. (I) Establishing pay parity among civilians serving in and qualified for work roles in support of cyberspace operations. (J) Establishing advancement parity for members of the Armed Forces serving in and qualified for work roles in support of cyberspace