; and (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following: (f) Whoever conspires to commit any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy. . 3. Protection of officers and employees of the United States (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Officers and employees of the United States Government dutifully and faithfully serve the United States, often placing themselves at serious risk of death or bodily harm, in order to preserve, protect, and defend the interests of the United States. (2) In prohibiting the assaulting, resisting, or impeding of officers and employees of the United States Government, Congress intended to maximize protection for Federal officers and employees and ensure that individuals who kill or assault Federal officers or employees are prosecuted. (3) The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit analyzed section 111 of title 18, United States Code, correctly when it found, Categorizing § 111(a)(1) as a general intent crime furthers the congressional objective: If a person acts in a manner which is assaultive toward a federal official, without specifically intending harm or the apprehension of imminent harm, the official still would be impeded in the performance of his official duties. United States v. Kimes, 246 F.3d 800, 809 (6th Cir. 2001), quoting United States v. Jennings, 855 F. Supp. 1427, 1440 (M.D. Pa. 1994). (4) Federal courts, including the United States Courts of Appeals for the Second, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits, have correctly interpreted section 111 of title 18, United States Code, to be a crime of general intent rather than a crime of specific intent. (5) Other Federal courts, including the United States Courts of Appeals for the First, Fifth, and Tenth Circuits, have issued decisions with language arguably suggesting that section 111 of title 18, United States Code, is a crime of specific intent rather than a