; (2) account for differences that could impact land management outcomes, including— (A) soil type; (B) type of land use; (C) type of crop; (D) geography and local climate; (E) geographic size of the land-use operation; (F) ongoing or existing conservation activities; and (G) such other items as the Secretary determines to be appropriate; (3) allow a user of the tool to estimate the changes in greenhouse gas emissions or soil carbon sequestration, and the uncertainty of those estimated changes, that occur as a result of implementing 1 or more conservation activities; and (4) be user friendly and accessible— (A) to producers and researchers; and (B) in multiple languages. (d) Reviews and updates (1) Reviews Not less frequently than annually, the modeling tool or tools described in subsection (a) shall be reviewed to determine if an update is required to reflect the best available data and science. (2) Updates If it is determined that an update is required under paragraph (1), the update shall be made not later than 1 year after the date of that determination. (e) Partners (1) In general In analyzing data, conducting research, and developing and maintaining the modeling tool or tools under subsection (a), the Secretary may partner with— (A) an Institution described in paragraph (2); (B) an institution of higher education with expertise in predictive modeling, large-scale data collection, soil carbon research, or agricultural land management to mitigate climate change; or (C) a Federal research center. (2) Institutions described An Institution referred to in paragraph (1)(A) is any of the following: (A) An 1862 Institution (as defined in section 2 of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 ( 7 U.S.C. 7601 )). (B) An 1890 Institution (as defined in that section). (C) A 1994 Institution (as defined in section 532 of the Equity in Educational Land-Grant Status Act of 1994 ( 7 U.S.C. 301 note