; (ii) experts within and outside government, including national labs, used to consult on technologies; and (iii) use of open source and classified information. (B) Potential methods to improve the evaluation and identification of such technologies, including— (i) leadership of the interagency process and what agency is best equipped to carry out this requirement; (ii) the level of financial resources needed; and (iii) whether the government has existing technical expertise to carry out this requirement or new partnerships or hiring authorities are needed. (C) An individual description of such technologies evaluated and recommended for identification, including— (i) what agency proposed the identification; (ii) the justification for the identification; (iii) end-uses and end-users of concern that will be able to access the technology; (iv) foreign availability of the technology and levels of control; (v) development of the technology in embargoed countries; and (vi) anticipated impacts, including loss of revenue, on the United States industrial base of the control. (D) An individual description of such technologies evaluated and not recommended for identification and control, including— (i) what agency proposed the control; (ii) what agency objected to the proposed control; (iii) foreign availability of the technology and levels of control; (iv) end-uses and end-users of concern that will be able to access the technology; (v) development of the technology in embargoed countries; (vi) justifications, risk-based and economic analyses, for not establishing controls