; (B) the activities conducted within sister city partnerships; (C) the economic and educational outcomes of such activities; (D) the types of information that sister city partnerships make publicly available, including information relating to contracts and activities; (E) the means by which United States communities safeguard freedom of expression within sister city partnerships; and (F) the oversight practices that United States communities implement to mitigate the risks of foreign espionage and economic coercion within sister city partnerships; (2) assess— (A) the extent to which United States communities ensure transparency regarding sister city partnership contracts and activities; (B) the extent to which sister city partnerships involve economic arrangements that make United States communities vulnerable to malign market practices; (C) the extent to which sister city partnerships involve educational arrangements that diminish the freedom of expression; (D) the extent to which sister city partnerships allow foreign nationals to access local commercial, educational, and political institutions; (E) the extent to which foreign communities could use sister city partnerships to realize strategic objectives that do not conduce to the economic and national security interests of the United States; (F) the extent to which sister city partnerships could enable or otherwise contribute to foreign communities’ malign activities globally, including activities relating to human rights abuses and academic and industrial espionage; and (G) the extent to which United States communities seek to mitigate foreign nationals’ potentially inappropriate use of visa programs to participate in activities relating to sister city partnerships; and (3) review— (A) the range of activities conducted within sister city partnerships, including activities relating to cultural exchange and economic development; (B) how such activities differ between sister city partnerships