; (iv) for reasons beyond the control of the provider, the provider cannot remove the proscribed visual depiction relating to a child using reasonable means; or (v) the notification was duplicative under subsection (c)(2)(C)(i). (B) Timeframe (i) In general Subject to clauses (ii) and (iii), a petition contesting a notification under this paragraph shall be considered timely if it is filed by a provider not later than 14 days after the day on which the provider receives the notification or the notification is made complete under subsection (c)(2)(D)(i). (ii) No designated reporting system Subject to clause (iii), if a provider does not have a designated reporting system, a petition contesting a notification under this paragraph shall be considered timely if it is filed by a provider not later than 7 days after the day on which the provider receives the notification or the notification is made complete under subsection (c)(2)(D)(i). (iii) Small providers In the case of a small provider, each of the timeframes applicable under clauses (i) and (ii) shall be increased by 48 hours. (C) Temporary removal of alleged proscribed visual depiction relating to a child (i) In general If a provider files a petition to the Board contesting a notification solely on the basis of the reason described in subparagraph (A)(i), the provider shall disable public and user access to the alleged proscribed visual depiction relating to a child that is the subject of the notification prior to the submission of the petition and during the pendency of the adjudication, including judicial review as provided in subsection (g)(28). Such petition shall include a statement, under the penalty of perjury, that public and user access to the alleged proscribed visual depiction relating to a child has been disabled. (ii) Effect of failure to remove (I) In general If a provider fails to comply with clause (i), the Board may— (aa) dismiss the petition with prejudice