1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act of 2020 . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Members of the Federal judiciary perform the important function of interpreting our Constitution and administering justice in a fair and impartial manner. (2) Federal judges must be able to act without fear of personal reprisal from individuals affected by the decisions they make in the course of carrying out their public duties. (3) In recent years, partially as a result of the rise in the use of social media and online access to information, members of the Federal judiciary have been exposed to an increased number of personal threats in connection to their role. (4) Between 2015 and 2019, threats and other inappropriate communications against Federal judges and other judiciary personnel increased from 926 in 2015 to approximately 4,449 in 2019. (5) Over the past decade, several members of the Federal judiciary have experienced acts of violence against themselves or a family member in connection to their Federal judiciary role, including the murder of the family of United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois Joan Lefkow in 2005. (6) On Sunday July 19, 2020, an assailant went to the home of Esther Salas, a judge for the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, impersonating a package delivery driver, opening fire upon arrival, and killing Daniel Anderl, the 20-year-old son of Judge Salas, and seriously wounding Mark Anderl, her husband. (7) In the aftermath of the recent tragedy that occurred to Judge Salas and in response to the continuous rise of threats against members of the Federal judiciary, there is an immediate need for enhanced security procedures and increased availability of tools to protect Federal judges and their families. 3. Definitions In this Act: (1) At-risk individual The term at-risk individual means— (A) a Federal judge