; “(2) to declare that peace and stability in the area are in the political, security, and economic interests of the United States, and are matters of international concern; “(3) to make clear that the United States decision to establish diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means; “(4) to consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States; “(5) to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character; and “(6) to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan;”; Whereas, in 2018, the Taiwan Travel Act ( Public Law 115–135 ) was enacted into law, and its passage expressed the sense of Congress that the United States Government should encourage visits between officials from the United States and Taiwan at all levels ; Whereas pursuant to the Taiwan Travel Act, “it should be the policy of the United States to— “(1) allow officials at all levels of the United States Government, including Cabinet-level national security officials, general officers, and other executive branch officials, to travel to Taiwan to meet their Taiwanese counterparts; [and] “(2) allow high-level officials of Taiwan to enter the United States, under conditions which demonstrate appropriate respect for the dignity of such officials, and to meet with officials of the United States, including officials from the Department of State and the Department of Defense and other Cabinet agencies”