; (4) not consider tests which do not achieve an intercept or the main objective as failures; and (5) recognize, in an effort to deliver capabilities at the speed of relevance, the learning value of individual advancements made by all test events, rather than viewing any total outcome as an indication of the reliability of entire missile defense systems. 8. Sense of Congress on missile defense technology development priorities It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the 2019 Missile Defense Review articulates a comprehensive approach to preventing and defeating the rapidly expanding offensive missile threat through a combination of deterrence, active and passive missile defense, and attack operations; (2) to counter the expanding offense missile capabilities of potential adversaries and hedge against unanticipated missile threats, the Secretary of Defense should aggressively pursue new missile defense capabilities and examine concepts and technologies for advanced missile defense systems; (3) the Secretary should fully implement the 2019 Missile Defense Review’s focus on increasing investments in and deploying new technologies and concepts, including— (A) the redesigned kill vehicle; (B) a hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor; (C) hypersonic glide vehicle defense; (D) directed energy for missile defense to include laser scaling; (E) the multi-object kill vehicle; (F) a space-based missile intercept layer; (G) improved Standard Missile 3 (SM–3) ballistic missile interceptors; (H) F–35 sensor suite missile defense integration; (I) neutral particle beam; and (J) missile defense capabilities from Missile Defense Agency-configured airborne platforms, including the discrimination sensor demonstrator; and (4) the Secretary should work to ensure that all missile defense systems are more survivable, including through— (A) more distributed air and missile defense operations; and (B) improved camouflage, concealment, and deception, including emission control.