; or (B) attach to or logically associate with the record an electronic signature; (2) that an individual was incompetent, lacked authority or capacity to execute the record, or did not knowingly and voluntarily execute a record; or (3) of fraud, forgery, mistake, misrepresentation, impersonation, duress, undue influence, or other invalidating cause. (b) Rule of construction Nothing in this Act may be construed to affect a State law governing, authorizing, or prohibiting the practice of law. 9. Exception to preemption A State law shall not be affected by a provision of section 3 or 4 of this Act to the extent that the law— (1) constitutes an enactment or adoption of the Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts, as approved and recommended for enactment in all States by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 2018, except that a modification to such Act enacted by a State shall be preempted to the extent the modification is inconsistent with this Act or would not be permitted under paragraph (2); or (2) specifies additional or alternative procedures or requirements for the performance of notarizations with respect to electronic records or for individuals not in the physical presence of a notary public at the time of the notarization, if those additional or alternative procedures or requirements— (A) are consistent with this Act; and (B) do not accord greater legal effect to the implementation or application of a specific technology or technical specification for performing those notarizations. 10. Validity of notarizations; standard of care; special notarial commissions; savings clause (a) Validity not affected The failure of a notary public to meet a requirement specified in this Act shall not invalidate or impair the recognition of a notarization performed by the notary public. (b) Rule of construction This Act may not be construed to create a public or private cause of action or remedy. (c) State standards of care