; or (2) impair the right of voters to seek other relief under applicable law for such discriminatory action, including under section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ( 52 U.S.C. 10302(c) ). (f) Legislative privilege No person, legislature, or State may claim legislative privilege under either State or Federal law in a civil action brought under this section or in any other legal challenge, under either State or Federal law, to a districting plan. 6. Safe harbor With respect to any claim under section 4, a State’s enacted congressional districting plan shall have a rebuttable presumption of validity if that plan was created by a nonpartisan or bipartisan redistricting commission, where support from members of more than one political party and, if applicable, nonaffiliated members, is required to approve a districting plan. 7. Transparency and reporting (a) Data Each State shall provide public access, in an easily useable format, to the demographic data and shape files used by the State to develop and analyze proposed districting plans. (b) Notice Prior to considering a congressional districting plan, the mapdrawing authority of a State shall hold one or more public hearings on such plan after giving notice of not less than 10 days, including on a website maintained by the State, of the mapdrawing authority's intent to hold such hearings. The mapdrawing authority of a State shall accept comments on all congressional districting plans so noticed as well as alternative map proposals covering all or part of a State and make all such comments and alternative map proposals publicly available on a website maintained by the State. (c) Report Any proposed congressional districting plan to be voted on by the mapdrawing authority of a State shall be accompanied by a written report, made available to the public not less than 72 hours before any initial vote, describing how the proposed plan satisfies the requirements of section 3 and 4, including an evaluation of the districting plan under multiple accepted measures of