; or (B) in a manner that unlawfully segregates, discriminates against, or otherwise makes unavailable to the individual or class of individuals the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation. (2) Exception Nothing in this section shall limit a covered entity from processing covered data for legitimate internal testing for the purpose of preventing unlawful discrimination or otherwise determining the extent or effectiveness of the covered entity’s compliance with this Act. (3) FTC advisory opinions A covered entity may request advice from the Commission concerning the covered entity’s potential compliance with this subsection, in accordance with the Commission’s rules of practice on advisory opinions. (b) Algorithmic decision-Making impact assessment (1) Impact assessment Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a covered entity engaged in algorithmic decision-making, or in assisting others in algorithmic decision-making for the purpose of processing or transferring covered data, solely or in part to make or facilitate advertising for housing, education, employment or credit opportunities, or an eligibility determination for housing, education, employment or credit opportunities or determining access to, or restrictions on the use of, any place of public accommodation, must annually conduct an impact assessment of such algorithmic decision-making that— (A) describes and evaluates the development of the covered entity’s algorithmic decision-making processes including the design and training data used to develop the algorithmic decision-making process, how the algorithmic decision-making process was tested for accuracy, fairness, bias and discrimination