unduly delay the course of negotiations. (D) The third-party licensee must not have put forth an unreasonable, unilateral proposal or further demonstrated an unwillingness to consider alternative reasonable terms or counterproposals. Bargaining without consideration of reasonable alternatives is inconsistent with an affirmative obligation to negotiate in good faith. (E) The third-party licensee must have showed good faith in negotiations through implementing or concluding action within a reasonable time period with reasonable notice and forum requests that are standard for negotiating practices. This standard is also applicable to any proposed forum requests by either party. Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, and qualifying Tribal entities availing themselves of this process can also make a showing that the third-party licensee had reasonable notice or understanding that the Indian Tribe, Native Hawaiian organization, or qualifying Tribal entity did not have the financial means to fulfill the third-party licensee’s expedited timing or change of forum requests or that extenuating circumstances existed that prohibited reasonable conduct to execute negotiations. (F) The Indian Tribe, Native Hawaiian organization, or qualifying Tribal entity that is responding to an offer proposed by the third-party licensee must also provide reasons and consideration for rejecting aspects of the third-party licensee’s offer in writing. (6) Additional considerations The Commission may make additional considerations for unreasonable behavior or egregious behavior for the totality of the circumstances standard under this subsection to determine whether a party negotiated in bad faith. (c) Safe harbor exemption for existing third-Party licensees Where a third-party licensee that holds a license to use spectrum over Tribal lands and has failed to meet additional construction requirements determined by the Commission under section 6(a)(5), a safe harbor exemption may apply to the third-party licensee, if such licensee has