; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (d) If the Director of the Office of Government Ethics refers a matter for investigation pursuant to section 402 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, or if the Special Counsel receives a credible complaint of a violation referred to in subsection (a)(6), the Special Counsel shall complete an investigation not later than 120 days thereafter. If the Special Counsel investigates any violation pursuant to subsection (a)(6), the Special Counsel shall report not later than 7 days after the completion of such investigation to the Director of the Office of Government Ethics and to Congress on the results of such investigation. . B Restoring Checks and Balances, Accountability, and Transparency IV Enforcement of Congressional Subpoenas 401. Short title This title may be cited as the Congressional Subpoena Compliance and Enforcement Act . 402. Findings The Congress finds as follows: (1) As the Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed, including in its July 9, 2020, holding in Trump v. Mazars, Congress’ power of inquiry—with process to enforce it—is an essential and appropriate auxiliary to the legislative function . Congress’ power to obtain information, including through the issuance of subpoenas and the enforcement of such subpoenas, is broad and indispensable . (2) Congress suffers a concrete and particularized injury when denied the opportunity to obtain information necessary to the exercise of its constitutional functions, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit correctly recognized in its August 7, 2020, en banc decision in Committee on the Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives v. McGahn. (3) Accordingly, the Constitution secures to each House of Congress an inherent right to enforce its subpoenas in court. Explicit statutory authorization is not required to secure such a right of action, and the contrary holding by a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in McGahn, entered on August 31, 2020,