; (7) identify and recommend measures to overcome how institutional barriers, such as Federal programs that do not account for Tribal sovereignty, constrain Tribal communities’ ability to pursue self-determined management of their resources and built environment; (8) identify measures that Congress, Federal agencies, or State and local governments should take to discourage or restrict new development and hard structural measures in areas vulnerable to such significant climate change impacts that they are likely to require a solution that includes relocation, in particular, where the Federal Government could establish stricter funding requirements for post-disaster funding that require updated building codes and land use strategies reflecting climate risk; (9) describe existing policies and clarify responsibilities of governments in complying with obligations to protect private property, including providing just compensation for any taking of private property; (10) propose an application process, available online, for States and communities to express affirmative interest in climate relocation assistance, either as a leaving community or receiving community; (11) provide guidance on and identify additional funding for operations and maintenance requirements for vacated land, and identify the resources needed to prioritize public access, recreational spaces, or conservation areas; (12) review efficacy of existing flood mitigation strategies on reducing flood risk to human populations, and identify opportunities to coordinate blue-green infrastructure solutions with buyout programs that increase the resilience of remaining residents; and (13) outline the amount and timing of Federal funding that is expected to be needed to implement the Climate Change Relocation Program. (f) Development of report to Congress In developing the report required under subsection (e), the Chair shall— (1) provide for public review and comment of a draft of the report