; (2) whether different thresholds should apply to different categories of activities; (3) the fields designated as critical on the suspicious activity report form and whether the number or nature of the fields should be adjusted; (4) the categories, types, and characteristics of suspicious activity reports and currency transaction reports that are of the greatest value to, and that best support, investigative priorities of law enforcement and national security personnel; (5) the increased use or expansion of exemption provisions to reduce currency transaction reports that are of little or no value to law enforcement efforts; (6) the most appropriate ways to promote financial inclusion and address the adverse consequences of financial institutions de-risking entire categories of high-risk relationships, including charities, embassy accounts, and money service businesses, as defined in section 1010.100(ff) of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, and certain groups of correspondent banks; (7) the current financial institution reporting requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act and regulations and guidance implementing that Act; (8) whether the process for the electronic submission of reports could be improved for both financial institutions and law enforcement, including by allowing greater integration between financial institution systems and the electronic filing system to allow for automatic population of report fields and the automatic submission of transaction data for suspicious transactions; (9) the appropriate confidentiality of personal information; (10) how to improve the cross-referencing of individuals or entities operating at multiple financial institutions and across international borders