; (D) a description of and an estimate of the number of residents of frontline communities to which the rule will apply or an explanation of why no such estimate is available; and (E) a description of the steps the agency has taken to minimize the negative, or maximize the positive, significant economic, environmental, and public health impact on frontline communities that are consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statutes, including— (i) a statement of the factual, policy, and legal reasons for selecting the alternative adopted in the final rule; and (ii) a description of why each 1 of the other significant alternatives to the rule considered by the agency which affect the impact on frontline communities was rejected. (3) Consideration In developing the final climate and environmental justice analysis under paragraph (1), the agency shall give strong consideration to the comments, recommendations, and findings within a report of a review panel under section 305(c)(6), if any, to ensure that benefits are maximized to impacted frontline communities. (b) Publication The head of the agency shall publish in the Federal Register the final climate and environmental justice analysis under subsection (a)(1) or a summary of that analysis. 304. Avoidance of duplicative or unnecessary analyses (a) Simultaneous analyses An agency may perform the analyses required by sections 301, 302, and 303 in conjunction with or as a part of any other agenda or analysis required by any other law if the other analysis satisfies the provisions of those sections, including the analyses required under chapter 6 of title 5, United States Code. (b) Exceptions (1) Small numbers affected Sections 302 and 303 shall not apply to any proposed or final rule if— (A) the head of the agency certifies that the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic, environmental, or public health impact on a substantial number of members of 1 or more frontline communities