; or (2) a lack of monetary or other resources to adopt innovative, integrated, community-based violence prevention programs. (c) Limitation The Attorney General may not make a grant to an eligible entity under this section unless the entity agrees to use not less than 70 percent of such grant for nonviolence-prevention education and program development. (d) Definitions In this section, the term eligible entity means a State or local government entity (including law enforcement), educational institution, nonprofit community, or faith-based organization. (e) Authorization of appropriations To carry out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $60,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2020 through 2025. C Local Public Health And Safety Protection 10301. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Local Public Health And Safety Protection Act . 10302. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) When it comes to gun violence, local laws serve the important purpose of addressing the unique issues and dangers facing each different community. (2) Most State constitutions generally allocate authority to local governments to regulate in the interests of the public health, safety, and welfare. States that have removed authority from local governments to regulate guns and ammunition have created a dangerous exception to the traditional rule of local authority. (3) Broad State preemption statutes ignore important local variations that may necessitate distinct approaches to the problem of gun violence. State preemption statutes threaten public safety because they prevent local governments from implementing customized solutions to gun violence in their communities. (4) By mandating a one-size-fits-all approach to firearms regulation, preemption statutes deprive the public of a critical problem-solving resource—local innovation. Local governments are often the source of cutting-edge laws to reduce gun violence, which are proven successful and later adopted at the statewide level. (5) State preemption statutes impede