; (iii) the inherent likelihood that the foods will contribute to the risk of foodborne illness; (iv) the best available evidence concerning reported illnesses associated with the foods produced in the proposed subcategory of facilities; and (v) the overall record of compliance with the food safety law among facilities in the proposed subcategory, including compliance with applicable performance standards and the frequency of recalls. (3) Specific facilities (A) In general The Administrator— (i) may establish an alternative inspection frequency for increased or decreased inspection for a specific food facility; and (ii) shall annually publish a list of food facilities subject to alternative inspection frequencies under clause (i). (B) Considerations In establishing an alternative inspection frequency for a specific food facility, the Administrator shall consider— (i) the supporting evidence that the specific food facility shall submit to the Administrator relating to whether an alternative inspection frequency should be established for that facility by the Administrator; (ii) whether products from the specific food facility have been associated with a case or an outbreak of foodborne illness; (iii) the record of the facility of compliance with the food safety law, including compliance with applicable performance standards and the frequency of recalls; and (iv) the considerations described in clauses (i) through (iii) of paragraph (2)(B). (4) Frequency requirements for categories 2, 3, and 4 An alternative inspection frequency for a subcategory of food facilities or a specific food facility under this subsection shall be— (A) in the case of a category 2 food facility, not less frequently than monthly