; and (ii) political subdivisions of eligible States; (B) in consultation with federally recognized Indian tribes; and (C) in accordance with the priorities established by 1 or more Governors of the eligible States in which an ecosystem affected by an invasive species is located. (3) Factors for consideration In developing a strategic plan under this subsection, the Secretary concerned shall take into consideration the economic and ecological costs of action or inaction, as applicable. (d) Cost-Effective methods In selecting a method to be used to control or manage an invasive species as part of a specific control or management project conducted as part of a strategic plan developed under subsection (c), the Secretary concerned shall prioritize the use of methods that— (1) effectively control and manage invasive species, as determined by the Secretary concerned, based on sound scientific data; (2) minimize environmental impacts; and (3) control and manage invasive species in the most cost-effective manner. (e) Comparative economic assessment To achieve compliance with subsection (d), the Secretary concerned shall require a comparative economic assessment of invasive species control and management methods to be conducted. (f) Expedited action (1) In general The Secretaries concerned shall use all tools and flexibilities available (as of the date of enactment of this section) to expedite the projects and activities described in paragraph (2). (2) Description of projects and activities A project or activity referred to in paragraph (1) is a project or activity— (A) to protect water or wildlife from an invasive species that, as determined by the Secretary concerned is, or will be, carried out on land or water that is— (i) directly managed by the Secretary concerned; and (ii) located in an area that is— (I) at high risk for the introduction, establishment, or spread of invasive species; and (II) determined by the Secretary concerned to require immediate action to address the risk identified in subclause (I)