; (B) whether information exists to conduct a revised or alternative radiation dose assessment that would consider exposures and exposure pathways that were not part of the radiation dose assessment described in subparagraph (A); and (C) whether conducting such a revised or alternative radiation dose assessment is feasible and would likely yield substantively improved estimates of the radiation dose received by members of the Armed Forces who participated in the cleanup of Enewetak Atoll. (2) If the study determines under paragraph (1)(C) that a revised or alternative radiation dose assessment is feasible and would likely yield substantively improved estimates of the radiation dose received by members of the Armed Forces who participated in the cleanup of Enewetak Atoll, an evaluation of conducting such assessment, including— (A) identification of the sources of the data for such assessment, including a delineation of the protocol to be used in conducting such assessment; (B) an estimate of the time and funding needed to conduct such assessment; (C) identification of the major sources of uncertainty in such assessment and how such sources may affect the estimates generated by such assessment; and (D) identification of the best means to carry out such assessment. (c) Report Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary receives the study conducted pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on such study, including the plans of the Secretary to carry out any actions based on the results of such study.