; and (ii) the participation in the level A offense by the movant was a direct result of the movant having been a victim of trafficking. (B) Expunging arrests for level A offenses The court may grant a motion under paragraph (1)(B) if, after notice to the Government and an opportunity to be heard, the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that— (i) the movant was arrested for a level A offense; and (ii) the conduct or alleged conduct that resulted in the arrest was directly related to the movant having been a victim of trafficking. (C) Expunging arrests for level C offenses The court may grant a motion under paragraph (1)(C) if, after notice to the Government and an opportunity to be heard, the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that— (i) the movant was arrested for a level C offense and the conduct or alleged conduct that resulted in the arrest was directly related to the movant having been a victim of trafficking; and (ii) (I) the movant was acquitted of the level C offense; (II) the Government did not pursue or dismissed criminal charges against the movant for the level C offense; or (III) (aa) the charges against the movant for the level C offense were reduced to a level A offense; and (bb) the movant was acquitted of the level A offense, the Government did not pursue or dismissed criminal charges against the movant for the level A offense, or any subsequent conviction of that level A offense was vacated. (5) Supporting evidence (A) Rebuttable presumption For purposes of this subsection, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the movant is a victim of trafficking if the movant includes in the motion— (i) a copy of an official record, certification, or eligibility letter from a Federal, State, Tribal, or local proceeding, including an approval notice or an enforcement certification generated from a Federal immigration proceeding, that shows that the movant was a victim of trafficking, including a victim of a trafficker charged with a violation of chapter 77