; and (iv) evaluates on a 5-point scale (the points of which include high , medium-high , medium , medium-low , and low ) how each projects meets subparagraphs (C) and (D) of paragraph (4). (B) Overall weighting The Secretary shall develop and publish a methodology that explains how the Secretary will weight each rating in subparagraph (A) when awarding grants under this section. The Secretary shall give at least 50 percent weight to the safety score calculated under subparagraph (A)(ii). (C) Prioritization The Secretary shall prioritize funding for those projects scoring highest under subparagraph (B). To be considered justified and receive a recommendation for funding in the annual report under paragraph (6), a project shall receive a satisfactory rating for each rating required under subparagraph (A). The Secretary shall determine and publish what is considered a satisfactory rating for the purposes of this subparagraph. (D) Posting of ratings Not later than 30 days after announcing an intent to award funds under this section, the Secretary shall post on the Department of Transportation’s website the overall ranking and scores, including the score for each metric quantified under paragraph (5)(A), for each eligible large application that submitted an application. (6) Annual report on funding recommendations for large projects (A) In general Not later than the first Monday in February of each year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Environment and Public Works and Appropriations of the Senate a report that includes— (i) a list of large projects that have requested a recommendation for funding under a new grant agreement from funds anticipated to be available to carry out this subsection in the next fiscal year; (ii) the evaluation under paragraph (4) and ratings under paragraph (5) for each project referred to in subsection (i)