; (D) the effectiveness of the various correctional education program’s length, and the value of credentials or degrees earned with different credit length; (E) the variance of different doses or credit length by educational program; (F) the models of instruction, curriculum, and other characteristics of program delivery that are most effective in a correctional environment; (G) challenges in providing programs and courses in the prison settings; (H) how such challenges were addressed; (I) suggestions for the agency to assist in addressing challenges; (J) impacts on the environment and safety of the correctional facility; (K) average and projected costs, overall and per student, of the program; (L) student demographic data, including age, gender, race, ethnicity, and security or custody level; and (M) other relevant data. (f) Evaluation (1) In general The Assistant Director, in coordination with the National Institute of Corrections and the Secretary of Education, shall conduct an evaluation of the Program that assesses— (A) in-custody outcomes, including impacts on tickets, segregation, program participation outside of education, and continued enrollment in correctional education programs; (B) post-release outcomes, including— (i) postsecondary enrollment in and continuance of education by eligible students after release; (ii) degree attainment from an institution of higher education; (iii) progress toward a degree in credits or time; (iv) continued participation in educational programs after release; (v) factors related to the pursuit of education, such as housing attainment; and (vi) other relevant factors; (C) safety in correctional facilities; (D) the demand for participation in correctional education programs, including the size of waiting lists; (E) employment outcomes of participants; (F) impacts on recidivism