Whereas, in April 2019, the Republic of Germany submitted a draft version of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2467, reaffirming its commitment to the continuation and full implementation of resolutions 1325 (2000), 1820 (2008), 1888 (2009), 1889 (2009), 1960 (2010), 2106 (2013), 2122 (2013), and 2242 (2015) on women, peace, and security; Whereas, as reported by the Guardian and other news outlets, the United States delegation opposed the original draft language on the grounds that ambiguity in the language could be interpreted as supporting abortion, and threatened to veto the resolution unless the paragraph was eliminated entirely; Whereas this is not the first instance in which the Trump administration has attempted to dilute human rights language and reporting related to reproductive health; Whereas the resolution was intended to be a declaration of global opposition to the use of sexual and gender-based violence in armed conflict; Whereas the resolution was intended to strengthen the Women, Peace, and Security Agenda in the lead up to October 2020, the 20th anniversary of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) on women, peace, and security, which recognized the disproportional impact that armed conflict has had on women and girls and called for the inclusion of a gender perspective in conflict resolution; Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 was the first recommendation by the United Nations Security Council to parties involved in an armed conflict to prevent the use of sexual and gender-based violence in armed conflict as well as ensure the inclusion of women in peace negotiations and postconflict reconstruction