; (B) eliminate Federal protections on over half of the Nation’s wetlands in the continental United States that were protected under the Reagan-era regulations; and (C) result in approximately 16,000 existing Clean Water Act permitted facilities (including industrial facilities and sewage treatment systems) that may be allowed to discharge pollutants without Federal oversight under the Clean Water Act. (12) In addition to the adverse human and environmental health impacts of the Trump administration’s Dirty Water Rule, this effort will also have lasting adverse economic impacts on American families, on farmers and other small businesses, and on the national, regional, and local economies. (13) Additionally, America’s wildlife-watching, hunting, fishing, and $887 billion outdoor recreation economy all depend upon access to clean water. (14) In some rural communities, river recreation, hunting, fishing, and related activities generate the largest share of the local economy; the streams and wetlands that will lose Federal protections under this rule include waters that provide essential aquatic habitat for the fish, waterfowl, and wildlife that sustain this way of life. (15) The Trump administration’s own document entitled Economic Analysis for the Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of Waters of the United States , dated January 22, 2020, recognizes the potential adverse impacts of its Dirty Water Rule on local economies, individual households, and public health, including— (A) an increase in the discharge of pollutants from point sources to newly unprotected rivers, streams, lakes, and wetlands, including reduced protection for aquatic ecosystems and public health and welfare