; and (ii) for each such component, identifies the assigned personnel strength, annual student throughput, and budget details covering the period of three fiscal years preceding the date of the report. (B) An assessment of the effectiveness and shortfalls of the existing professional military education enterprise as measured against graduate utilization, post-graduate evaluations, and the education and force development requirements of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Chiefs of the Armed Forces. (C) Recommendations to improve the intellectual readiness of the joint force through reforms designed to— (i) improve the warfighting readiness, intellectual fitness, and cognitive ingenuity of military leaders; (ii) promote development of strategic thinkers capable of developing integrated political-military and cross-domain strategies and new doctrinal concepts; (iii) enhance the effectiveness, coherence, and efficiency of individual service approaches to professional military education; (iv) improve the depth and rigor of professional military education curriculum in alignment with national defense strategy pacing threats while enhancing strategic relationships and operational integration with key allies and international security partners; and (v) foster the deliberate development of world-class faculty through increasing the value of faculty assignments and other appropriate measures.