; (2) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate ; (3) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate ; (4) the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives ; (5) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives ; and (6) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives . (b) Contents The report under subsection (a) shall include— (1) a discussion of whether a need exists to regulate space-based radio-frequency mapping; (2) a description of any immitigable impacts of space-based radio-frequency mapping on national security, United States competitiveness and space leadership, or Constitutional rights; (3) any recommendations for additional regulatory action regarding space-based radio-frequency mapping; (4) a detailed description of the costs and benefits of the recommendations described in paragraph (3); and (5) an evaluation of— (A) whether the development of voluntary consensus industry standards in coordination with the Department of Defense is more appropriate than issuing regulations with respect to space-based radio-frequency mapping; and (B) whether existing law, including regulations and policies, could be applied in a manner that prevents the need for additional regulation of space-based radio-frequency mapping. (c) Form The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. III Miscellaneous 301. Promoting fairness and competitiveness for NASA partnership opportunities (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) fair access to available NASA assets and services on a reimbursable, noninterference, equitable, and predictable basis is advantageous in enabling the United States commercial space industry; (2) NASA should continue to promote fairness to all parties and ensure best value to the Federal Government in granting use of NASA assets, services, and capabilities in a manner that contributes to NASA's missions and objectives