; (6) a justification for the incorporation or rejection of any comments from coordination with frontline communities under section 305; (7) a description of the individuals and groups from the coordination with frontline communities under section 305; and (8) an identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant Federal rules which may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the proposed rule. (d) Significant alternatives An initial climate and environmental justice analysis under subsection (b)(1)(A) shall contain a description of any significant alternatives to the proposed rule that— (1) accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes; and (2) (A) minimize any significant negative economic, environmental, or public health impact of the proposed rule on frontline communities; or (B) maximize any significant positive economic, environmental, or public health impact of the proposed rule on frontline communities. (e) Projected impacts An initial climate and environmental justice analysis under subsection (b)(1)(A) shall include a description of— (1) any projected economic, environmental, or public health impacts, positive or negative, on frontline communities as a result of the proposed rule; (2) any potential cumulative impact on frontline communities that results from the proposed rule, in combination with previously promulgated rules; (3) any significant alternatives to the proposed rule that— (A) accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes; and (B) (i) minimize any significant negative economic, environmental, or public health impact of the proposed rule on frontline communities; or (ii) maximize any significant positive economic, environmental, or public health impact of the proposed rule on frontline communities