; and (ii) enjoining the use of that districting plan and requiring the State to develop a remedial districting plan that does not violate section 3 or 4 in accordance with subsection (b); (B) shall consider any violation of section 3 to be probative evidence that the districting plan has the purpose of unduly favoring or disfavoring a political party in contravention of section 4; and (C) in connection with an asserted claim of a violation of section 4, may consider, among other things, statistical evidence of the extent and durability of partisan bias, electoral responsiveness, and the ability of each party to translate votes into seat share. (b) Remedies related to prohibited partisan gerrymandering In remedying a violation of section 4, a court shall apply the following: (1) If the court finds that the State has established a districting plan with the purpose of unduly favoring or disfavoring a political party, the court shall appoint a special master or panel of special masters to develop a remedial districting plan, which shall be approved by the court before taking effect. (2) If the court finds that the State has established a districting plan that will have the effect, but does not have the purpose, of unduly favoring or disfavoring a political party, the court may, in its discretion— (A) appoint a special master or panel of special masters to develop a remedial districting plan, which shall be approved by the court before taking effect