; (II) in clause (iii), by striking prior experience and inserting accountability for outcomes ; and (III) in clause (v), by striking prior experience and inserting accountability for outcomes ; (ii) by striking subparagraph (B) and redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B); and (iii) in subparagraph (B), as so redesignated, by adding at the end the following: (vii) Technical components of applications (I) Treatment of nonsubstantive technical components of applications With respect to any competition for a grant under this chapter, the Secretary may not reject grant applications on the sole basis of a failure to meet page limits and formatting standards (including with respect to font size, font style, font type, line spacing, paragraph justification, and page margins). (II) Treatment of technical budget errors in applications (aa) In general With respect to any competition for a grant under this chapter, the Secretary may not reject grant applications on the sole basis of a typographical or rounding error in a proposed budget until the Secretary has given the applicant an opportunity for correction in accordance with item (bb). (bb) Notice and opportunity for correction The Secretary shall provide notice and identification of an error described in item (aa) to the applicant before awarding grants for each competition and shall allow the applicant to submit a revised application that corrects the identified error. (cc) Treatment of revised applications The Secretary shall treat the revised application in the same manner as a timely submitted application. (dd) Failure to correct If an applicant has received a notice and opportunity for correction of a typographical or rounding error in a proposed budget in accordance with item (bb) and the applicant fails to correct the error and submit a revised application, the Secretary may reject or penalize that grant application.