1. Short title This Act may be cited as the State- and Science-based Gray Wolf Reintroduction Act of 2020 . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) For the last 20 years, scientists at the United States Fish and Wildlife Service have recommended against further reintroduction of gray wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains where the species has already exceeded recovery goals. (2) The United States Fish and Wildlife Service wrote in the final rule titled Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Rule To Reclassify and Remove the Gray Wolf From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in Portions of the Conterminous United States; Establishment of Two Special Regulations for Threatened Gray Wolves (68 Fed. Reg. 15803; April 1, 2003) that [e]stablishing additional populations would provide no additional genetic benefits to wolf recovery under the Act… and new recovery programs are not necessary to achieve recovery of the gray wolf under the Act either as formerly listed in the 48 States and Mexico or under the new listings established by this final rule . (3) Under President Obama, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service published a final rule on April 2, 2009, titled Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants