; or (ii) the United States district court for the District of Columbia. (B) Expeditious completion of judicial review In the judicial review of an action challenging a forest landscape project described in subparagraph (A), Congress encourages a court of competent jurisdiction to expedite, to the maximum extent practicable, the proceedings in the action with the goal of rendering a final determination on jurisdiction, and, if jurisdiction exists, a final determination on the merits, as soon as practicable after the date on which a complaint or appeal is filed to initiate the action. (C) Injunctions (i) In general Subject to clause (ii), the length of any preliminary injunctive relief or stay pending appeal covering a forest landscape project described in subparagraph (A) shall not exceed 60 days. (ii) Renewal (I) In general A court of competent jurisdiction may issue 1 or more renewals of any preliminary injunction, or stay pending appeal, granted under clause (i). (II) Updates In each renewal of an injunction in an action, the parties to the action shall present the court with updated information on the status of the forest landscape project. (iii) Requirement for injunction A court shall not enjoin an agency action under a forest landscape project described in subparagraph (A) if the court determines that the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate that the claim of the plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits. (iv) Balancing of short- and long-term effects As part of weighing the equities while considering any request for an injunction that applies to an agency action under a forest landscape project described in subparagraph (A), the court reviewing the project shall balance the impact to the ecosystem likely affected by the project of— (I) the short- and long-term effects of undertaking the agency action