; (ii) the person’s education and literacy level; and (iii) any assistance the person has received to date, including the sufficiency of that assistance and whether it will be available in the future. (B) The degree of factual investigation required. (C) The complexity of the legal and factual questions. (D) The degree to which the claims turn on credibility determinations, including the need for cross-examination. (E) Whether the person has asserted any colorable claims. That fact that attorneys have declined to take the case shall not be an considered an indication of a lack of colorable claims. (F) The need for expert testimony. (G) The court’s willingness to aid the person in presenting claims by, for example, explaining how to introduce and move for the admission of evidence. (H) Whether any opposing party is represented by counsel. (I) Any other factors the court considers relevant, other than that pro se pleadings are construed more liberally by the court. (3) The court may not deny a request on the grounds that it has not yet ruled on dispositive motions, such as a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. (4) The court should consider whether to provisionally appoint counsel for limited purposes, such as responding to a particular motion, amending the complaint, representing a person at mediation, conducting discovery, or investigating the claims for purposes of providing a recommendation to the court as to whether a full appointment is warranted. (5) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) through (4), whenever the court determines that the interests of justice so require, representation may be provided for any financially eligible person who is seeking relief under section 2241, 2254, or 2255. .