; or (BB) the receiving subscriber has provided prior express consent to receive the call or text message and has not revoked that consent; and (III) to offer to the receiving subscriber the ability to request that the receiving provider prevent the receiving subscriber from receiving calls and text messages originating from a particular originating subscriber. (C) Commission oversight (i) Appeals process relating to alleged autodialers The standards established under subparagraph (B)(ii)(II) shall provide for an appeals process under which— (I) an originating subscriber may notify the Commission that the technology offered under that subparagraph by a receiving provider is— (aa) incorrectly identifying the calls or text messages of the originating subscriber as originating or probably originating from an automatic telephone dialing system; or (bb) preventing receiving subscribers from receiving calls or text messages originated by the originating subscriber that are permitted under item (bb) of that subparagraph; (II) if the Commission finds that the circumstance about which the originating subscriber notified the Commission exists, the Commission shall— (aa) notify the receiving provider of the finding; and (bb) take such action as is reasonably necessary to correct the circumstance; and (III) if the receiving provider is preventing a receiving subscriber from receiving calls or text messages originated by the originating subscriber because the receiving subscriber has requested that prevention, whether directly or through a call-blocking service, the Commission— (aa) may not require the receiving provider to stop preventing the calls or text messages unless the receiving subscriber provides affirmative consent