; (ii) is performing labor under the contract or subcontract, respectively, that is subject to the order; and (iii) loses compensation due to the work of such laborer or mechanic ceasing as a result of such order. (7) Successfully disproving occurrence of misclassification (A) In general In any case where a contractor or subcontractor with respect to whom an order was issued under paragraph (1) successfully proves through a review under paragraph (3) or subsequent hearing or appeals proceeding under paragraph (4) that the 2 or more laborers or mechanics who were the subject of the order were not misclassified in violation of subsection (a)— (i) the order issued under paragraph (1), and any order issued against the contractor or subcontractor under subsection (d)(1) with respect to such 2 or more laborers or mechanics, shall cease to be in effect; (ii) the contractor or subcontractor shall not be liable for any applicable back pay, damages, or civil penalties owed by the contractor or subcontractor under this subchapter with respect to the misclassification of such 2 or more laborers or mechanics; and (iii) the Secretary of Labor, administrative law judge, or the court shall award (and the Secretary of the Treasury shall, in accordance with subparagraph (B), pay) to the contractor or subcontractor— (I) an amount equal to any demonstrable lost net profits resulting from the order, as demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence