; and (B) by amending the fourth sentence to read as follows: Not later than 15 days after receiving notice from the director of enforcement under the previous sentence, the person may provide the director of enforcement with a written response that no action should be taken against such person on the basis of the complaint. . (c) Revision of standard for review of dismissal of complaints (1) In general Section 309(a)(8) of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(8) ) is amended to read as follows: (8) (A) (i) Any party aggrieved by an action of the Commission (including a determination of the director of enforcement which is not overruled by the Commission) dismissing a complaint filed by such party after finding either no reason to believe a violation has occurred or no probable cause a violation has occurred may file a petition with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Any petition under this subparagraph shall be filed within 60 days after the date on which the party received notice of the dismissal of the complaint. (ii) In any proceeding under this subparagraph, the court shall determine by de novo review whether the dismissal of the complaint is contrary to law. In any matter in which the penalty for the alleged violation is greater than $50,000, the court should disregard any claim or defense by the Commission of prosecutorial discretion as a basis for dismissing the complaint. (B) (i) Any party who has filed a complaint with the Commission and who is aggrieved by a failure of the Commission, within one year after the filing of the complaint, to either dismiss the complaint or to find reason to believe a violation has occurred or is about to occur, may file a petition with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. (ii) The Commission may submit under seal an ex parte request for a temporary stay of any proceeding initiated under clause (i), and the court may grant such request if it determines that the investigation of the complaint by the Commission is being held in