; and (B) considers to have significant technical, policy, or military expertise. (c) Elements The study conducted pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A technical evaluation of the Joint Cyber Warfighting Architecture of the Department, especially the Unified Platform, Joint Cyber Command and Control, and Persistent Cyber Training Environment, including with respect to the following: (A) The suitability of the requirements and, as relevant, the delivered capability of such architecture to modern cyber warfighting. (B) Such requirements or capabilities as may be absent or underemphasized in such architecture. (C) The speed of development and acquisition as compared to mission need. (D) Identification of potential duplication of efforts among the programs and concepts evaluated. (E) The coherence of such architecture with the National Mission Teams and Combat Mission Teams of the Cyber Mission Force, as constituted and organized on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act. (F) The coherence of such architecture with the Cyber Protection Teams of the Cyber Mission Force and the cybersecurity service providers of the Department, as constituted and organized on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act. (G) The coherence of such architecture with the concepts of persistent engagement and defending forward as incorporated in the 2018 Department of Defense Cyber Strategy, including with respect to operational concepts such as consistent spy-on-spy deterrence, securing adversary operating pictures, and preemptively feeding indicators and warning to defensive operators. (2) A technical evaluation of the tool development and acquisition programs of the Department, including with respect to the following: (A) The suitability of planned tool suite and cyber armory constructs of the United States Cyber Command to modern cyber warfighting. (B) The speed of development and acquisition as compared to mission need. (C) The resourcing and effectiveness of the internal tool development