; or (B) limits the authority of a court to hear a claim arising under the Constitution of the United States. (4) Preemption of State licensing requirements Notwithstanding any other provision of law, judicial determination, consent decree, or settlement agreement, a State may not require an immigration detention facility used to detain families consisting of one or more children who have not attained 18 years of age and the parents or legal guardians of such children, that is located in the State, to be licensed by the State or any political subdivision thereof. (5) Authorization of appropriations There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subsection. (k) Applicability of consent decrees, settlements, and judicial determinations (1) Flores settlement agreement inapplicable Conduct and activity that was, before the date of the enactment of this subsection, subject to a restriction or an obligation imposed by the stipulated settlement agreement filed on January 17, 1997, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Flores v. Reno (CV 85–4544–RJK) (commonly known as the Flores settlement agreement ), including any modification of and any judicial determination based on such agreement— (A) shall not be subject to such restriction or obligation; and (B) shall be subject to the restrictions and obligations under this Act. (2) Other settlement agreements or consent decrees Any settlement agreement or consent decree relating to the conditions of detention of an alien child shall be consistent with subsection (j). . (b) Safe and prompt return of unaccompanied alien children Section 235(a) of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 ( 8 U.S.C. 1232(a) ) is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)— (A) by amending the paragraph heading to read as follows: Rules for repatriating unaccompanied alien children