evidence and make a similar determination. (9) The United Nations Human Rights Council’s Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar (the Mission) concluded in August 2018 and August 2019 reports that there is sufficient information to warrant the investigation and prosecution of Tatmadaw officials to determine their liability for genocide and also found that a pervasive culture of impunity at the domestic level, which led the Mission to conclude that the impetus for accountability must come from the international community . (10) The ability of Rohingyas to leave Bangladesh to return home is impeded by many factors, not least of which: the lack of Burmese citizenship for the Rohingya minority, that the homes of the Rohingya were largely destroyed in the 2017 violence, and that Rohingya still fear the ongoing violence due to the civil war and military officers who act with impunity against the local civilian population. (11) In 2016, after a 27-year suspension period, the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program for Burma was re-instated, and Burma was designated as a least-developed beneficiary developing country under the program. (12) Just one year after having the GSP program reinstated, Burma’s GSP-eligible exports to the United States were valued at $93,900,000, the second highest value for least-developed beneficiary developing countries after Cambodia. 3. Withdrawal of designation of Burma under the Generalized System of Preferences program (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall withdraw the application of the duty-free treatment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.) with respect to Burma. (b) Certification The President may reinstate the application of duty-free treatment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.) with respect to Burma after the date on which the authority of subsection (a) is exercised only if the President submits to the appropriate congressional