; (B) 34 percent of such tweets directed to Michigan residents; (C) 30 percent of such tweets directed to Wisconsin residents; (D) 41 percent of such tweets directed to Florida residents; (E) 40 percent of such tweets directed to North Carolina residents; and (F) 35 percent of such tweets directed to Ohio residents. (6) In Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945), the Supreme Court found, It would be strange indeed, however, if the grave concern for freedom of the press which prompted adoption of the First Amendment should be read as a command that the government was without power to protect that freedom. . 3. Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the United States Government has a compelling interest in— (1) mitigating the deceptiveness of social media bots, which impersonate human activity online, through public disclosure requirements that impose a minimal burden on rights protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; (2) regulating the use of social media bots in political advertising, which is intended to deceive voters and suppress human speech, in a manner that does not— (A) distinguish between political messages based on— (i) content; or (ii) the nature of the person producing a message; or (B) impose any aggregate limit on political speech; and (3) mitigating the effectiveness of efforts by foreign entities to influence United States elections through the use of social media bots to spread misinformation and propaganda. 4. Public disclosure of software programs intended to impersonate or replicate human activity (a) Definitions (1) In general In this section— (A) the term automated software program or process intended to impersonate or replicate human activity online has the meaning given the term by the Commission by regulation under paragraph (2); (B) the term Commission means the Federal Trade Commission; (C) the term social media provider means any person that owns or operates a social media website