; (III) the rule needs to be modified in order to accomplish the regulatory objective; (IV) other alternatives to the rule or modification of the rule could better achieve the regulatory objective while maximizing net benefits; and (V) an additional assessment of the rule in accordance with this subparagraph is appropriate at a specific time during the 10-year period following completion of the assessment. (B) Different methodology If an agency uses a methodology other than the methodology under paragraph (1)(B)(ii) to assess data under subparagraph (A), the agency shall include as part of the notice required to be published under subparagraph (C) an explanation of the changes in circumstances that warranted the use of that other methodology. (C) Publication Not later than 180 days after the date on which an agency completes an assessment of a major rule under subparagraph (A), the agency shall publish a notice of availability of the results of the assessment in the Federal Register, including the specific time for any subsequent assessment of the rule under subparagraph (C)(i), if applicable. (3) OIRA oversight The Administrator shall— (A) issue guidance, based on models developed by the National Academy for Public Administration under the Cost-Benefit Analysis Improvement Act of 2017 for agencies regarding the development of the framework under paragraph (1) and the conduct of the assessments under paragraph (2)(A); (B) oversee the timely compliance of agencies with this subsection; (C) ensure that the results of each assessment conducted under paragraph (2)(A) are— (i) published promptly on a centralized Federal website; and (ii) noticed in the Federal Register in accordance with paragraph (2)(D); (D) encourage and assist agencies to streamline and coordinate the assessment of major rules with similar or related regulatory objectives