were often overlooked during ICE inspections of facilities. (5) The Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and the Office of Inspector General have received formal complaints and numerous allegations of inadequate medical care for pregnant women who are in custody in such facilities. (6) Responses by the Department of Homeland Security to Freedom of Information Act requests suggest that fewer than 3 percent of the claims of sexual and physical abuse of detainees in such facilities have been investigated by the Office of Inspector General. (7) Multiple Federal oversight bodies, including the Homeland Security Advisory Council, have documented limited oversight and management accountability of immigration detention facilities, including a lack of reasonable inspections and deficient contracting practices. (8) Legal service providers allege that some immigration detention facilities have unreasonably restricted legal visitation and access in violation of applicable requirements, raising serious due process concerns. (9) The Department of Homeland Security seeks to vastly expand the immigration detention system despite the availability of a wide array of community-based alternatives to detention that provide a cheaper, more compassionate, rights respecting response to migration. (10) In June 2017, the Department of Homeland Security terminated the Family Case Management Program, an alternative to detention that— (A) had proved far less expensive than detention