; and (B) provide, and will continue to provide, a majority of the funds that are available to State fish and wildlife agencies for science-based research and management of fish and wildlife; (10) State fish and wildlife agencies are— (A) responsible for the conservation and management of all fish and wildlife in the State; but (B) grossly underfunded because there are few funds available at the State level for fish and wildlife conservation, except those driven by— (i) hunting and fishing license revenues; and (ii) Federal excise tax revenues; (11) a subaccount known as the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Account was established by Congress by section 3(a)(2) of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act ( 16 U.S.C. 669b(a)(2) ) (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) to support the full array of fish and wildlife conservation needs identified by State fish and wildlife agencies (including for species that are not hunted or fished), but only authorized appropriations for the subaccount for 1 year; (12) while appropriated funds have been made available through the State and Tribal Wildlife Grants program of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the lack of assured and sufficient dedicated funding for the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration subaccount has left unrealized the goals of the subaccount— (A) allowing fish and wildlife populations to continue to decline across the United States; and (B) resulting in hundreds of species being listed as threatened species or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); (13) under the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act ( 16 U.S.C. 669 et seq.), each State and territory is required to seek public input and produce a comprehensive fish and wildlife conservation strategy, commonly known as a State Wildlife Action Plan , to guide the State-led conservation of the full array of fish, wildlife, and habitat