; (4) continually identify new advances and innovative practices in effective ways to conduct de-escalation training to incorporate such advances and innovative practices into the standards under section 3 and implementation of such grant program; and (5) provide— (A) on a biennial basis, reports to the Secretary regarding the Advisory Board’s activities and the effectiveness of such grant program; and (B) not later than 2 years after the award of the first grant under section 5, and every 5 years thereafter, a report to the Congress on the Advisory Board’s activities, challenges to the programs and activities under this Act, and the effectiveness of such programs and activities. (d) Evaluation of HHS proposals Not later than 90 days after the Secretary proposes standards under section 3 or rules or guidance for implementing the grant program under section 5, and prior to the Secretary finalizing such standards, rules, and guidance, respectively, the Advisory Board shall evaluate— (1) whether the training to be funded pursuant to section 5 can be applied practically in everyday scenarios that have the potential for violence that are regularly faced by law enforcement officers, teachers, health care and wellness professionals, youth, faith leaders, and other categories of persons for whom such training could help to reduce tensions and avoid conflict; (2) whether the principles of such training can effectively work with other types of professional training such as mental health training that employs evidence-based de-escalation techniques; (3) the extent to which the proposed standards under section 3 adequately address and effectively take into consideration the role of implicit bias, cultural competency, and the intersection of race and policing; (4) whether the standards and guidance under sections 3 and section 5 effectively promote alternatives to the use of lethal and nonlethal force