proceeding brought against the youth if the court finds the following: (1) The statement is admissible under the applicable rules of evidence. (2) The prosecution has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the youth made the statement voluntarily, and that such statement is reliable. (3) The prosecution has proven by clear and convincing evidence that one or more of the following circumstances existed at the time of the custodial interrogation: (A) The questions put forth by law enforcement personnel, and the youth’s responsive statements, were part of the routine processing or intake of the youth. (B) Before or during a custodial interrogation, after having consulted with his or her lawyer, the youth unambiguously declared on the recording that he or she would only respond to the officer’s questions if his or her statements were not recorded. (C) The custodial interrogation took place in another jurisdiction and was conducted by officials of that jurisdiction in compliance with the law of the jurisdiction. (D) Exigent circumstances existed, which prevented the making of, or rendered it not feasible to make, a recording of the custodial interrogation. (d) Exception relating to statements made in court A statement made by a youth in a custodial interrogation which would be inadmissable under subsection (b) may be admitted into evidence in a juvenile delinquency or criminal proceeding brought against the youth if the court finds the following: (1) The statement was made before a grand jury or in court. (2) The statement is admissible under applicable rules of evidence. (3) The prosecution has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the youth made the statement voluntarily, and that such statement is reliable. (e) Exception relating to statements made by prisoners (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), a statement made by a youth in a custodial interrogation which would be inadmissable under subsection (b) may be admitted into evidence in a juvenile delinquency or criminal proceeding brought