; or (II) reductions in further threats to water or soil quality or other environmental or safety conditions; (vi) the applicant has— (I) demonstrated that the applicant has the proper and appropriate experience and capacity to complete the permitted work; (II) demonstrated that the applicant will complete the permitted work; (III) the financial and other resources to address any contingencies identified in the Good Samaritan permit application described in subsections (b) and (c); (IV) granted access and provided the authority to review the records of the applicant relevant to compliance with the requirements of the Good Samaritan permit; and (V) demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the Administrator, that— (aa) the applicant has, or has access to, the financial resources to complete the project described in the Good Samaritan permit application, including any long-term monitoring and operations and maintenance that the Administrator may require the applicant to perform in the Good Samaritan permit; or (bb) the applicant has established a third-party financial assurance mechanism, such as a corporate guarantee from a parent or other corporate affiliate, letter of credit, trust, surety bond, or insurance to assure that funds are available to complete the permitted work, including for operations and maintenance and to address potential contingencies, that establishes the Administrator or the head of the Federal land management agency as the beneficiary of the third-party financial assurance mechanism and that allows the Administrator to retain and use the funds from the financial assurance mechanism in the event the Good Samaritan does not complete the remediation under the Good Samaritan permit; and (vii) the project meets the requirements of this Act; (B) the State or Indian tribe with jurisdiction over land on which the orphan mine site is located has been given an opportunity to review and, if necessary, comment on the grant of the Good Samaritan permit