; and (B) there is a reasonable likelihood that the project will continue to meet the requirements under this section. (g) Evaluation of large projects (1) In general The Secretary may select a large project for a grant under the program only if the Secretary evaluates the proposed project and determines that the project is justified because the project— (A) in the case of a rehabilitation or improvement project, addresses a need to improve the condition of the bridge, as determined by the Secretary, by— (i) undertaking significant repairs and improvements, including any repairs that address conditions that caused the Secretary to identify the bridge as structurally deficient under section 144(b); (ii) updating features that do not meet applicable engineering standards that are current as of the date of review of the features for the use of the bridge; or (iii) improving structural elements the failure of which would cause the bridge, or a portion of the bridge, to collapse; (B) in the case of a replacement project, will obviate a need, as determined by the Secretary— (i) to undertake significant repairs and improvements, including any repairs that address conditions that caused the Secretary to identify the bridge as structurally deficient under section 144(b); (ii) to update features that do not meet applicable engineering standards that are current as of the date of review of the features for the use of the bridge; or (iii) to improve structural elements the failure of which would cause the bridge, or a portion of the bridge, to collapse; (C) will generate, as determined by the Secretary, measurable— (i) benefits derived from the prevention of closure or reduced use of a bridge to be rehabilitated, improved, or replaced; (ii) safety benefits, including the reduction of accidents and related costs; (iii) mobility benefits, including congestion reduction; (iv) national or regional economic benefits; (v) benefits from long-term resiliency to extreme weather, flooding, or sea level rise