; and (II) in which the United States is a complaining party; or (ii) any other finding which is contained in a report of a dispute settlement panel or the Appellate Body that is adopted by the Dispute Settlement Body. (2) Scope of review The Commission shall advise the Congress in connection with each adverse finding or other finding under paragraph (1)(B) only whether— (A) the dispute settlement panel or the Appellate Body, as the case may be— (i) exceeded its authority or its terms of reference; (ii) added to the obligations, or diminished the rights, of the United States under the Uruguay Round Agreement which is the subject of the finding; (iii) acted arbitrarily or capriciously, engaged in misconduct, or demonstrably departed from the procedures specified for panels and the Appellate Body in the applicable Uruguay Round Agreement; and (iv) deviated from the applicable standard of review, including in antidumping, countervailing duty, and other unfair trade remedy cases, the standard of review set forth in Article 17.6 of the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994; and (B) the finding is consistent with the original understanding by the United States of the Uruguay Round Agreement that is the subject of the finding as explained in the statement of administrative action approved under section 101(a) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3511(a) ). (3) No deference Applying the standards set forth in paragraph (2) requires that the Commission not accord deference to findings of law made by the dispute settlement panel or the Appellate Body, as the case may be. (b) Determination