; Whereas Mr. Rosenstein and the DOJ have refused to provide an alternative timeline for providing these categories of documents; Whereas the DOJ has not provided a privilege log of the redactions with— (1) the privilege asserted; (2) the type of document; (3) the general subject matter; (4) the date, author, and address; and (5) the relationship of the author and address to each other, if any document is withheld or redacted on the basis of a privilege; Whereas the DOJ has failed to comply with a memorandum of understanding negotiated with the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to expedite the production of documents for this congressional investigation following the issuance of the March 22 subpoena; Whereas upon in camera review of documents at the DOJ, it was revealed the Department, under the supervision of Mr. Rosenstein, attempted to conceal certain facts as documents provided to Congress were heavily and unnecessarily redacted; Whereas the DOJ unnecessarily redacted the price of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s $70,000 conference table because it was potentially embarrassing information; Whereas the DOJ redacted facts such as FBI Agent Peter Strzok’s personal relationship with FISC Judge Rudolph Contreras; Whereas the DOJ redacted the names of high-ranking Obama administration officials, such as former White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough; Whereas the DOJ acknowledged the unnecessary redactions and agreed that some information should not have been redacted in an April 16, 2018, letter; Whereas, on May 17, 2017, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein appointed Robert S. Mueller III as the Special Counsel to investigate allegations of collusion between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia; Whereas Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein authored the initial memo outlining the scope of the investigation in May 2017