; (ii) barriers to increased utilization of such screening, diagnostic, and treatment services; and (iii) the impact of State Medicaid plan design and State regulatory decisions on the provision of such services; (C) the feasibility of, State experiences with, and considerations regarding, systematic collection and sharing of data that— (i) is carried out by health care providers, State, local, and tribal educational agencies, social service providers, law enforcement, and any other entity providing services in a covered setting (as defined in section 101(f)); (ii) relies on common data measures, fosters communication and coordination across covered settings (as so defined), and promotes shared accountability for the data; and (iii) relates to the screening, referral, and support of children and youth, and their families as appropriate, who have experienced or are at risk of experiencing trauma; (D) privacy and consent issues affecting identification and treatment of children and youth who have experienced or are at risk of experiencing trauma, including considerations regarding information collected and reported by providers and regarding parental consent; (E) (i) the comprehensive, coordinated, and multisector process through which State, local, and tribal educational agencies locate, identify, and screen infants and toddlers with disabilities, and children with disabilities (including such children who are youth), under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.); and (ii) considerations, strategies, alignment opportunities, and applicability for trauma-informed models for conducting such location, identification, and screening; (F) (i) clinical child and adolescent mental health and child- and youth-serving social service workforce capacity, including analyzing that capacity by setting, geographic distribution, and population served; and (ii) barriers that contribute to any shortages in professionals in that workforce