; (C) the inherent likelihood that the foods will contribute to the risk of foodborne illness; (D) the best available evidence concerning reported illnesses associated with the foods produced in the proposed subcategory of facilities; and (E) the overall record of compliance with the food safety law among facilities in the proposed subcategory, including compliance with applicable performance standards and the frequency of recalls. (4) The Administrator may adopt alternative inspection frequencies for increased or decreased inspection for a specific facility, subject to paragraphs (2) and (5), and shall annually publish a list of facilities subject to alternative inspections. (5) In adopting alternative inspection frequencies for a specific facility, the Administrator shall consider— (A) the supporting evidence that an individual food facility shall submit related to whether an alternative inspection frequency should be established for such facility by the Administrator; (B) whether products from the specific facility have been associated with a case or an outbreak of foodborne illness; (C) the record of the facility of compliance with the food safety law, including compliance with applicable performance standards and the frequency of recalls; and (D) the criteria in paragraph (3). (6) Before establishing decreased alternative inspection frequencies for subcategories of facilities or individual facilities, the Administrator shall— (A) describe the alternative uses of resources in general terms when issuing the regulation or order that establishes the alternative inspection frequency