; (ii) 40 percent of the costs incurred with respect to any elements described in subparagraph (B); and (iii) 100 percent of the income forgone with respect to any elements described in subparagraph (C). ; and (2) in subsection (f), by striking the subsection designation and heading and all that follows through For each in paragraph (2) and inserting the following: (f) Allocation of funding for wildlife habitat For each . (b) Limitation on payments Section 1240G of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–7 ) is amended by striking $450,000 and inserting $150,000 . (c) Program reforms Section 1240F of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–6 ) is amended— (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking To the extent and inserting the following: (a) Producer assistance To the extent ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (b) Program reforms Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall— (1) coordinate the program with the conservation effects assessments carried out by the Secretary— (A) to ensure that the conservation effects assessments consider the practical limitations and costs and benefits encountered by the Secretary in implementing the program; and (B) to use information collected through conservation effects assessments carried out by the Secretary to direct funds of the program to contracts that will optimize environmental benefits; and (2) revise guidance issued to States with regards to allocation processes of program funds within the States to provide that, in determining the allocation of program funds within a State, the State should use data regarding environmental concerns, if available, as a primary factor to prioritize projects. . (d) High-Priority practices (1) Definition of high-priority practice Section 1240A of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–1 ) is amended— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (5) as paragraphs (3) through (6), respectively