; (6) establishing educational and cultural exchange programs with Tibet; (7) providing humanitarian, food, medical, vocational training, primary and secondary education, and other assistance to Tibetan refugees; (8) funding programs to promote and preserve Tibetan culture and the resilience of Tibetan communities in India and Nepal; (9) funding a scholarship program for Tibetan refugees to study in the United States; (10) providing assistance to nongovernmental organizations working to preserve the Tibetan environment and cultural traditions; and (11) appropriating funds for National Endowment for Democracy programs related to Tibet; Whereas section 901(b)(6) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 ( Public Law 101–246 ; 104 Stat. 80) stated that United States policy toward China should be explicitly linked with the situation in Tibet, specifically including— (1) lifting martial law in Lhasa and other parts of Tibet; (2) opening Tibet to foreigners, including the press and international human rights organizations; (3) releasing Tibetan political prisoners; and (4) conducting negotiations between representatives of His Holiness the Dalai Lama and the Government of the People's Republic of China; Whereas the Tibetan Policy Act of 2002 (subtitle B of title VI of Public Law 107–228 ; 22 U.S.C. 6901 note), signed into law on September 30, 2002— (1) established United States principles with respect to human rights, religious freedom, political prisoners, and economic development projects in Tibet; (2) established in statute the position of the Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues in the Department of State; (3) established annual reporting requirements on Sino-Tibetan negotiations and safeguarding Tibet’s distinct cultural identity, both by the Secretary of State and by the congressionally established Congressional-Executive Commission on China; (4) mandated the provision of Tibetan language training to interested foreign service officers