; Whereas the Supreme Court of the United States has recognized that family abduction— (1) is a form of child abuse with potentially devastating consequences for a child , that may include negative impacts on the physical and mental well-being of the child; and (2) can cause a child to experience a loss of community and stability, leading to loneliness, anger, and fear of abandonment ; Whereas, according to the 2010 Report on Compliance with the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction by the Department of State, research shows that an abducted child is at risk of significant short- and long-term problems, including anxiety, eating problems, nightmares, mood swings, sleep disturbances, [and] aggressive behavior ; Whereas international parental child abduction has devastating emotional consequences not only for the child but also for the parent from whom the child is separated; Whereas the United States has a history of promoting child welfare through institutions including— (1) in the Department of Health and Human Services— (A) the Administration for Children and Families; and (B) the Children's Bureau; and (2) in the Department of State, the Office of Children’s Issues; Whereas Congress has signaled a commitment to ending international parental child abduction by enacting the International Child Abduction Remedies Act ( 22 U.S.C. 9001 et seq.), the International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993 ( Public Law 103–173 ; 107 Stat. 1998), and the Sean and David Goldman International Child Abduction Prevention and Return Act of 2014 ( 22 U.S.C. 9101 et seq.); Whereas, in 2012, the Senate adopted Senate Resolution 543, 112th Congress, agreed to December 4, 2012, which— (1) condemned international parental child abduction; (2) urged countries identified by the Department of State as noncompliant with the Hague Convention on Abduction to fulfill the commitment those countries made to implement the Hague Convention on Abduction