; the Obama Administration’s use of the Fund to make this and other payments raises serious concerns by sidestepping Congress; and (B) in 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services announced its intentions to use the Fund for settlements with health insurers who sued the Federal Government over the loss of funds for risk corridors under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. (3) Failing to address the lack of oversight over the Fund annually costs taxpayers billions of dollars, as payments exceeded $4.6 billion in 2016 and more than $26 billion in the preceding 10 year period. (b) Policy on Judgment Fund It is the policy of this concurrent resolution that the House should consider legislation that reclaims Congress’s power of the purse over the Fund. Such legislation should— (1) prohibit interest payments paid from the Fund for accounts or assets frozen by the Federal Government and listed on— (A) the Sanctions Programs list of the Office of Foreign Asset Control of the Department of Treasury; or (B) Sponsors of Terrorism list of the Department of State; (2) amend sections 2414 and 1304 of titles 28 and 31, United States Code, respectively, to— (A) provide a clear definition and explanation of a foreign court or tribunal ; and (B) require congressional notification whenever the Fund makes a settlement or court ordered lump sum or aggregated payment exceeding $500 million