1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Retail Justice Review Act of 2018 . 2. Definitions In this Act— (1) the term potential program participant means an individual who a retailer has probable cause to believe stole or attempted to seal property from the retailer; (2) the term program participant means an individual who— (A) a retailer has probable cause to believe stole or attempted to steal property from the retailer; and (B) participates in a retail theft rehabilitation program offered by the retailer; (3) the term retail theft rehabilitation program means an education program that a retailer offers, directly or through a third party, to a potential program participant instead of making or filing a report of theft with a law enforcement agency; and (4) the term retailer means a person that is engaged in the business of selling goods at retail. 3. Study and report (a) Study (1) In general The Attorney General shall conduct a study that examines the effectiveness of retail theft rehabilitation programs. (2) Requirements In conducting the study under paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall— (A) consider any information the Attorney General considers relevant to examining the effectiveness of retail theft rehabilitation programs, including the effect of the programs on— (i) the number of calls made to law enforcement agencies due to retail theft; (ii) the burden of retail theft on law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, courts, and other justice system agencies; (iii) the recovery of restitution or civil remedies by retailers; and (iv) recidivism among program participants; (B) evaluate the fairness of retail theft rehabilitation programs, including whether the effects of the programs are discriminatory on the basis of race, age, sex, or income; (C) include case studies of retail theft rehabilitation programs in effect as of the date on which the study is initiated, including, to the extent practicable, case studies drawn from geographically diverse regions of the United States