; and (2) the State shall repay the Commission for any advance payments made under subsection (c) with respect to any period during which the plan was not in compliance with such requirements or was administered in a biased or incompetent manner. 206. Administration of program in case of States without approved implementation plans in effect (a) Administration by Commission authorized If a State does not have an approved State implementation plan in effect with respect to a year under section 205, the Commission shall administer the Democracy Dollars Program during the year with respect to individuals who are residents of the State, in accordance with a Federal implementation plan for the State that meets the requirements of subsection (b). (b) Availability of Federal receivership in case of revocation on grounds of bias or incompetence (1) Receivership If a State does not have an approved State implementation plan in effect because, in accordance with subsection (d) of section 205, the Commission revoked its approval of a State implementation plan on the grounds that the State administered the plan in a biased or incompetent manner, the Commission may file an action to appoint a receiver to administer the Democracy Dollars Program in the State. (2) Procedures for consideration of request for receivership In any action brought by the Commission to appoint a receiver under this subsection, the following rules shall apply: (A) The action shall be filed in the appropriate district court of the United States and shall be heard by a 3-judge court convened pursuant to section 2284 of title 28, United States Code. (B) A final decision in the action shall be reviewable only by appeal directly to the Supreme Court of the United States. Such appeal shall be taken by the filing of a notice of appeal within 10 days, and the filing of a jurisdictional statement within 30 days, of the entry of the final decision. (C) It shall be the duty of the appropriate district court of the United States and the Supreme Court of the United