; (4) while the document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled Circular A–4 and dated September 17, 2003, specifies that, in carrying out an evaluation of the global effects of a rule, regulation, or action, the evaluation shall be reported separately from domestic costs and benefits of that rule, regulation, or action, the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide instead calculates the global benefits in lieu of, not in addition to, the domestic costs of a rule, regulation, or action; (5) the use of the estimates of the social cost of greenhouse gases, including the estimates for the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide, in the rulemakings and other actions of the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Transportation, and the Council on Environmental Quality was without— (A) an adequate opportunity for public notice and comment; and (B) rigorous scientific peer review; (6) the Environmental Protection Agency relied on— (A) the interagency working group estimate of the social cost of methane, without appropriate peer review or opportunity for public notice and comment, in attempting to justify the costs and benefits of— (i) the proposed rule entitled Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources (80 Fed. Reg. 56593 (September 18, 2015)); and (ii) the final rule entitled Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources (81 Fed. Reg. 35824 (June 3, 2016)) and the accompanying regulatory impact analysis entitled Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Final Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources , prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, in May 2016 and identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0505–7630