; and (ii) the participation in the covered offense by the movant was a direct result of the movant having been a victim of trafficking. (B) Expunging arrests for covered offenses The court shall grant a motion under paragraph (1)(B) if, after notice to the Government and an opportunity to be heard, the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that— (i) the movant was arrested for a covered offense; and (ii) the conduct or alleged conduct which resulted in the arrest was directly related to the movant having been a victim of trafficking. (C) Expunging arrests for noncovered offenses The court shall grant a motion under paragraph (1)(C) if, after notice to the Government and an opportunity to be heard, the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that— (i) the movant was arrested for a noncovered offense and the conduct or alleged conduct which resulted in the arrest was directly related to the movant having been a victim of trafficking; and (ii) (I) the person is acquitted of the noncovered offense; (II) the Government does not pursue or dismisses criminal charges against the person for the covered offense; or (III) (aa) the charges against the person for the noncovered offense are reduced to a covered offense; and (bb) the person is acquitted of the covered offense, the Government does not pursue or dismissed criminal charges against the person for the covered offense, or any subsequent conviction of that covered offense is vacated. (5) Supporting evidence (A) Rebuttable presumption For purposes of this section, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the movant is a victim of trafficking if the movant includes in the motion— (i) a copy of an official record, certification, or eligibility letter from a Federal, State, tribal, or local proceeding, including an approval notice or an enforcement certification generated from a Federal immigration proceeding, that shows that the movant was a victim of trafficking, including a victim of a trafficker charged with a violation of chapter 77