; (6) permit the information described in this section to be freely shared by the public, such as by social media; (7) use permanent uniform resource locators for the information described in this section; and (8) provide an opportunity for the public to provide input about the usefulness of the site and recommendations for improvements. 7404. Postdecision explanation for failed applicants If requested by an applicant for a competitive grant, for each grant award made in an amount in excess of $100,000 pursuant to a merit-based selection procedure, an Executive agency shall provide the applicant with a timely direct interaction describing the basis for the award decision of the Executive agency, including, if applicable, the decision not to award a grant to the applicant. 7405. Inspector General review of peer review process Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of the Grant Reform and New Transparency Act of 2016 , the Inspector General of each Executive agency that awards competitive grants shall conduct a review of the effectiveness of the conflicts of interest policy of the Executive agency, including a review of a random selection of peer review processes, with respect to the peer review process for competitive grants in order to detect favoritism. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle V of title 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 73 the following: 74. Grant transparency requirements 7401 . (c) Grants workforce report (1) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Executive agency The term Executive agency has the meaning given the term in section 105 of title 5, United States Code, except the term does not include the Government Accountability Office. (B) Federal grants workforce The term Federal grants workforce , with respect to an Executive agency, means all employees of the Executive agency who spend some or all of their time engaged in— (i) grant planning, including programmatic activities