; (ii) the failure of the Director of National Intelligence, in the role of the Director as security executive for the Federal Government, to define in policy the term Executive Agent may be further limiting the ability of the Center to receive sufficient resources to carry out the critical Federal mission of the Center; and (iii) the evolution of the Center from an organization of the Army to an organization serving 27 departments and agencies and responsible for all Federal credibility assessment training, oversight, and research and development, has resulted in a convoluted oversight structure based on legacy reporting requirements. (B) Report Not later than October 1, 2018, the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit to the congressional intelligence committees and the congressional defense committees a report on— (i) the current and projected missions and functions of the National Center for Credibility Assessment; (ii) the effectiveness of the current organizational assignment of the Center to the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency; (iii) the effectiveness of the current oversight structure between the Center, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, and the Director of National Intelligence; and (iv) the resources and authorities necessary to most effectively execute the missions and functions of the Center. (2) Underground Facilities Analysis Center (A) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (i) the assignment of executive agency for the Underground Facilities Analysis Center to the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency may be limiting the ability of the Center to effectively serve the broader intelligence community customer base of the Center