; (B) $33,600,000,000 in business revenue from maritime activity; and (C) $4,600,000,000 in Federal, State, provincial, and local tax revenue from maritime activity. (9) In 2012 the Russian Duma passed legislation to create a single management agency called the Northern Sea Route Administration, to manage all infrastructural and navigational services across what Russia claims to be its Arctic territorial waters. This is a claim the United States and many other nations do not recognize. Russia is investing heavily into Northern Sea Route infrastructure, anticipating an increase in cargo transport from 1,800,000 tons in 2010 to 64,000,000 tons by 2020. The Russian Northern Sea Route Administration charges escort fees for international cargo ships as high as $500,000, and aims to collect a share of revenues that might otherwise be paid as tariffs on the Suez Canal where collections totaled $5,300,000,000 in 2017. (10) The Russian Federation has considered legislation to require all energy traffic on the Northern Sea Route to be carried by Russian-flagged ships. (11) Rising transit in United States Arctic region waters necessitates a management agency and infrastructure investment in a transportation system. As identified in the Ten-Year Prioritization of Infrastructure Needs in the United States Arctic prepared by the United States Committee on the Marine Transportation System Arctic Transportation Integrated Action Team for the United States Department of Transportation, there is a significant infrastructure gap in the Arctic in the areas of— (A) navigable waterways, such as waterway coordination with international stakeholders; (B) physical infrastructure, such as infrastructure around Port Clarence and Port of Nome in Alaska to support commercial activity; (C) informational infrastructure, such as up-to-date nautical charts and electronic aids to navigation; (D) MTS Response Services, such as emergency response and rescue capabilities