; and (ii) in applying section 2004(c)(1) of such Act with respect to distributions under this subparagraph, 100 percent shall be substituted for 80 percent each place that term appears. (B) Consultation In determining how an implementation grant is distributed within a State, the State shall consult with local and regional chief information officer, emergency managers, and senior public safety officials of the State. (4) Competitive award Except as provided in subsection (h), biennial implementation grants shall be awarded— (A) exclusively on a competitive basis; and (B) based on the recommendations of the Review Committee. (5) Limitation on number of grants The Secretary may award to a State not more than 2 biennial implementation grants under this section. (g) Use of grant funds (1) Limitations Any grant awarded under this section shall supplement and not supplant State or local funds or, as applicable, funds supplied by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and may not be used— (A) to provide any Federal cost-sharing contribution on behalf of a State; or (B) for any recreational or social purpose. (2) Approved activities for implementation grants A State or a government entity that receives funds through a biennial implementation grant may use such funds for one or more of the following activities, to the extent that such activities are proposed under subsection (f)(1)(A) : (A) Supporting or enhancing information sharing and analysis organizations. (B) Implementing or coordinating systems and services that use cyber threat indicators (as such term is defined in section 102 of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 ( 6 U.S.C. 1501 )) to address cybersecurity threats or vulnerabilities. (C) Supporting dedicated cybersecurity and communications coordination planning, including the coordination of— (i) emergency management elements of such State; (ii) National Guard units, as appropriate; (iii) entities associated with critical infrastructure or key resources