and savings, including the number of years, beginning with the date of completion of the recommended consolidation, closure, or realignment action, for the savings to exceed the costs. (B) The economic impact on existing communities in the vicinity of the military installation (including potential impacts to employment, termination of contractual agreements, and closure of commercial facilities), calculated using standardized, federally recognized economic impact data when calculating the impact on existing communities. (C) The impact on homeland security and emergency response preparedness in a State or region. (D) The ability of the infrastructure of both the existing and potential receiving communities to support forces, missions, and personnel. (E) The environmental impact, including the impact of costs related to potential environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities. (b) Priority considerations In making recommendations for the consolidation, closure, and realignment of military installations, the Secretary shall give priority consideration to the military value criteria, as specified in subsection (a)(1). (c) Consideration of time period for achieving savings (1) Emphasis on net-savings within five years The Secretary shall place an emphasis on recommendations for the consolidation, closure, and realignment of military installations that will yield net-savings within five years of the completion of the recommended consolidation, closure, or realignment action. (2) Recommendations with long-delayed net-savings The Secretary may not make a recommendation that will not demonstrate net-savings within 20 years, unless the Secretary certifies as part of the recommendation that the military value of the recommendation supports or enhances a critical national security interest of the United States. (d) Covered costs When determining the costs associated with a recommendation for the consolidation, closure, or realignment of a military installation, the Secretary shall