; and (ii) retain sufficient integrity to support the themes and events associated with the area’s national significance; and (B) the area provides opportunities to conserve natural, historic, cultural, or scenic resource through local and regional partnerships. (2) A conceptual boundary for the proposed area is developed based upon community input and the resources and themes that support the area’s national significance. (3) Residents, business interests, nonprofit organizations, and governments, including Federal land management agencies and tribal governments within the proposed area, have been involved in the feasibility study process and have demonstrated significant support through letters and other means for National Heritage Area designation. (4) A local coordinating entity has been selected to operate the proposed heritage area’s activities and the organization is supported by residents, business interests, nonprofit organizations, and governments within the proposed area. (5) The recommendations put forth in the feasibility study are consistent with continued economic activity within the area. 6. Management plan (a) In General Except as provided in subparagraph (b), a management plan for any National Heritage Area shall— (1) use a comprehensive planning approach that includes— (A) opportunities for stakeholders, such as community members, local and regional governments, tribes, businesses, nonprofit organizations, and others, to be involved in the planning process; (B) opportunities for stakeholders to review and comment on the draft plan; and (C) documentation of the planning and public participation processes used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how and when the stakeholders were involved; (2) include an inventory of the natural, historic, cultural, or scenic resources of the National Heritage Area related to the nationally significant themes and events of the region that should be protected, enhanced, interpreted, managed, or developed