expansion of legal sports wagering after the decision in Murphy v. NCAA, 138 S. Ct. 1461 (2018), presents an opportunity to significantly reduce the illegal sports wagering market by pairing enhanced authority for law enforcement to shut down the illegal sports wagering market with policies that incentivize participants in the illegal sports wagering market to shift their activity into the legal sports wagering market, as available, so that such activity can be appropriately regulated and taxed. (9) All forms of gaming have historically been regulated predominantly at the State level, but sports wagering, which often involves individuals across numerous States placing sports wagers on a sporting event that takes place in yet another State, affects interstate commerce more than other forms of gaming that are generally contained within the walls of a gaming establishment. (10) While each State may decide whether to permit sports wagering and how to regulate sports wagering, there is an important role for Congress to set standards for sports wagering and provide law enforcement with additional authority to target the illegal sports wagering market and bad actors in the growing legal sports wagering market. 3. Definitions In this Act: (1) Amateur athletic competition The term amateur athletic competition has the meaning given the term in section 220501 of title 36, United States Code. (2) Anonymized sports wagering data With respect to a sports wager accepted by a sports wagering operator, the term anonymized sports wagering data means— (A) a unique identifier for the transaction and, if available, the individual who placed the sports wager, except that such identifier shall not include any personally identifiable information of such individual