; (3) identifying the circumstances and timing of any expenditures made by the manufacturer to expand access to the qualifying drug and explaining any improvement in public health associated with those expenditures; (4) providing sales and price information for other qualifying drugs with similar therapeutic effects, as relevant to assessing the extent of competition in the marketplace, and the choice available to consumers; and (5) providing any other information that the manufacturer believes to be relevant to a determination of whether a violation of this Act has occurred. (d) Statement Not later than 45 days after the date on which a manufacturer receives a statement under subsection (c), the manufacturer shall submit to the Secretary a statement described in subsection (c). (e) Determination by Secretary If the Secretary determines, after review of the statement of justification, or based on reasonable belief if the manufacturer fails to submit a statement of justification as required, that the manufacturer has engaged in price gouging with respect to a qualifying drug, the Secretary shall notify the manufacturer of the determination. (f) Remedy (1) In general The Secretary may order that a manufacturer determined under subsection (e) to have engaged in price gouging with respect to a qualifying drug— (A) restore to any consumer, including a third-party payor, any excessive amount paid as a result of a price increase that violates this Act; (B) make the drug available to participants of any qualified health plan or Federal health plan for a period of up to 1 year at the price at which the drug was made available to consumers immediately before the violation of this Act