and more economically by conventional units. (B) A detailed assessment whether the global allocation of special operations forces, and especially the most capable units, is aligned to the pacing threats and priority missions of the National Defense Strategy. (C) A detailed description of the changes required to align the joint special operations enterprise more effectively with the National Defense Strategy. (9) An assessment of the manner in which increased use of the space domain should revise or reallocate the requirements of the joint force, including the following: (A) A detailed description of the missions, including joint moving target indication, air battle management, and missile and aircraft tracking and targeting, that could be performed more effectively from space-based platforms due to emerging technology and operational requirements. (B) An assessment of the manner in which the joint force can take advantage of the development and deployment of disaggregated commercial satellite Internet constellations to replace legacy tactical communications networks and devices and achieve multi-domain command and control more effectively and at lower cost. (C) An assessment of the manner in which to ensure that the joint force has access to technologies that deliver superior offensive space capabilities and a maneuver advantage to and within the space domain, including reusable launch systems and spacecraft, on-orbit refueling and manufacturing, on-orbit power generation, and exploitation of space minerals and propellants. (D) A detailed description of the actions to be taken by components of the Department to promote and protect the development of a licit space economy, including the following: (i) Defense of commercial activities, facilities, and claims. (ii) Safety of navigation. (iii) Rescue and recovery. (iv) Construction and maintenance of public works in Cis-Lunar Space. (v) Active debris remediation. (vi) Establishment of an on-orbit national strategic reserve of space minerals and propellants. (10) A