1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Inmate Calling Technical Corrections Act of 2018 . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Prison, jails, and detention centers in the United States have unique telecommunications needs due to safety and security concerns. (2) Unjust and unreasonable charges negatively impact the safety and security of communities in the United States by exacerbating recidivism by damaging relationships between inmates and their support systems. (3) It is the policy of the United States to ensure that all people in the United States, including anyone who pays for communications with inmates via telephone and advanced communications, are afforded just and reasonable charges for all communications services. (4) The current inmate communications market suffers from market failure. Among other issues, consumers cannot choose among competing providers, which produces locational monopolies and monopoly profits at the expense of rate-payers. (5) Charges for communicating with individuals detained in prisons, jails, and detention centers have been shown to be unjust and unreasonable as a result of industry practices and lack of competition. (6) Unjust and unreasonable charges extend to telephone and advanced communications services and to both intrastate and interstate communications. (7) The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit interpreted section 276 of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 276 ) in the case of Global Tel*Link v. Federal Communications Commission, 866 F.3d 397 (D.C. Cir. 2017), in part by constricting the meaning of the word fair and limiting the means by which the Federal Communications Commission can calculate fair, just, and reasonable charges. 3. Technical amendments (a) In general Section 276 of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 276 ) is amended— (1) in subsection (b)(1)(A)— (A) by striking per call ; (B) by inserting , and all charges are just and reasonable, after fairly compensated ; (C) by striking each and every