; and (ii) shall not jeopardize legitimate security and penological interests. (B) Impact on revenue To the extent the regulations adopted by the Commission under this subsection reduce or eliminate the revenue derived by administrators of correctional institutions, departments of correction, and similar entities from the receipt of commissions, such effects of the regulations shall not be considered to be jeopardizing or otherwise affecting legitimate security or penological interests. (3) Periodic review The Commission shall review, on a biennial basis, the regulations adopted under this subsection, including to determine whether any compensation rates established by the Commission should be modified. (4) State preemption To the extent that any State, local government, or private correctional facility requirements are inconsistent with the regulations of the Commission affecting or pertaining to inmate telephone and video service, including restrictions on the payment of commissions based upon inmate telephone and video service revenues or earnings, the regulations of the Commission on such matters shall preempt the State, local government, or private correctional facility requirements. (j) Inmate telephone and video service fully subject to sections 201, 205, 251, 252, and 276 (1) In general Inmate telephone and video service shall be fully subject to the requirements of sections 201, 205, 251, 252, and 276. (2) Restriction A provider of inmate telephone and video service may not block or otherwise refuse to carry a call placed by an incarcerated person on the grounds that the provider has no contractual or other arrangement with the local exchange carrier serving the intended recipient of the call or other common carrier involved in any portion of the transmission of the call. . 9005. Federal prisoner reentry initiative reauthorization