Tupaia (mammal)
Introduction '''''Tupaia''''' is a treeshrew genus in the family Tupaiidae that was first described by Thomas Stamford Raffles in 1821.The name of this genus derives from the Malay word  meaning squirrel or small animal resembling a squirrel.
Characteristics Raffles described the genus as having an elongated snout, eight to 10 incisors, well-developed limbs, five-toed naked feet, and the sole furnished with projecting pads and sharp claws, with a habit and tail of a squirrel.Marcus Ward Lyon published a revision of the genus in 1913, and also noted the squirrel-like appearance of ''Tupaia'' species, which only lack the long black whiskers and have smaller ears. They do not have any markings on the face, the naked area of the nose is finely reticulated, an oblique stripe on the shoulder is more or less distinct, and the tail is haired but not tufted. The braincase is about as wide as the maxillary tooth row is long. The temporal fossa is smaller than the orbit. The dental formula is . The first pair of upper incisors is longer than the second, while the second pair of lower incisors is slightly larger than the first and third pairs. The lower canines are better developed than the upper ones and stand high above the adjacent premolars. The size of head, body, and tail varies between species.One outstanding characteristic of ''Tupaia'' species is their color vision. They have rod and cone visual receptors similar to humans and other primates.
Classification and taxonomic history When Diard and Duvaucel described the first specimen of the common treeshrew ''Tupaia glis'' in 1820, they considered it a species of ''Sorex.'' ''T. everetti'' was moved back into the genus from ''Urogale'', disbanding the latter, based on a 2011 molecular phylogeny.Subsequent to Raffles' description of the genus, these additional ''Tupaia'' species were described:* Northern treeshrew ''T. belangeri'' — by Wagner in 1841* Golden-bellied treeshrew ''T. chrysogaster'' — by Miller in 1903* Bangka Island treeshrew ''T. dicolor'' — by Lyon in 1906* Striped treeshrew ''T. dorsalis'' — by Schlegel in 1857* Mindanao treeshrew ''T. everetti'' — by Thomas in 1892*Sumatran treeshrew ''T. ferruginea'' — by Raffles in 1821* Slender treeshrew ''T. gracilis'' — by Thomas in 1893*Javan treeshrew ''T. hypochrysa'' — by Thomas in 1895* Horsfield's treeshrew ''T. javanica'' — by Horsfield in 1821* Long-footed treeshrew ''T. longipes'' — by Thomas in 1893* Pygmy treeshrew ''T. minor'' — by Günther in 1876* Calamian treeshrew ''T. möllendorffi'' — by Matschie in 1898* Mountain treeshrew ''T. montana'' — by Thomas in 1892* Nicobar treeshrew ''T. nicobarica'' — by Zelebor in 1868* Palawan treeshrew ''T. palawanensis'' — by Thomas in 1894* Painted treeshrew ''T. picta'' — by Thomas in 1892*Kalimantan treeshrew ''T. salatana'' — by Lyon in 1895* Ruddy treeshrew ''T. splendidula'' — by Gray in 1865* Large treeshrew ''T. tana'' — by Raffles in 1821* †''Tupaia miocenica'' — by Mein and Ginsburg in 1997In the past, various authors proposed to place treeshrews in the ordinal rank Insectivora, or considered them close relatives of primates. Since 1972, the treeshrew families Tupaiidae and Ptilocercidae are grouped in the order Scandentia.
Distribution and habitat ''Tupaia'' species range from northeastern India, Myanmar, Nicobar Islands eastward to some of the Philippine Islands, and from central China south to Java, Borneo and Sumatra, including islands on the southwest coast. They do not occur on Celebes, nor on islands to the east of Java, with the possible exception of Bali.They inhabit the dense undergrowth of tropical forests. With the exception of ''T. minor'', they are primarily terrestrial and forage on the forest floor, usually below . Since they are rarely seen crossing wide roads, populations likely are negatively affected by fragmentation of forests caused by logging operations.
Ecology and behaviour Early naturalists described wild-caught captive ''Tupaia'' specimens as restless, nervous, and rapidly reacting to sounds and movements. Their auditory sensitivity is highly developed as the broad frequency range of their hearing reaches far into the ultrasonic.The shape of the cheek-teeth of ''Tupaia'' species indicate they are foremost insectivores. Captive specimens were reported to hunt ants, flies, crickets, grasshoppers, cockroaches, and small beetles. They hold their food between their forelegs while sitting on their haunches. After feeding, they smooth their heads and faces with both forepaws, and lick their lips and palms. They are also fond of water, both to drink and to bathe. They fortify their diet with soft fruits that are mostly dispersed by birds. They swallow the pulp, but reject fibrous components, which they cannot digest due to their long and small intestines and rudimentary ceca.The well-developed olfactory perception of treeshrews enables them to easily detect food among the leaf litter on the forest floor. Their sensitivity for odours coupled with scent-marking of their territories is important in their interaction with conspecifics.Observations of ''Tupaia'' species in their natural habitats suggest they usually form monogamous pairs. Social behaviour differs between species and the available food resources in their territories. Where food is adequate and sufficient, they tolerate conspecifics without engaging in territorial disputes. Common treeshrews observed in the Bukit Timah Nature Reserve defended diminishing food resources by chasing away residents of adjacent areas.Birds of prey, snakes, and small carnivores are known to hunt treeshrews. Humans have no interest in killing them for food because of their unpleasant taste, and they are rarely seen as pests.===Reproduction and development===Treeshrews share more similarity with rodents and squirrels than with primates in regards to their reproduction and development. In contrast to primates, which produce one baby with longer gestation periods, treeshrews generally have litters of two or three young and are only ''in utero'' about 45 days. Female treeshrews give birth in nests made of many dry leaves, and are known to leave the young unattended while returning occasionally to give them milk. Parental care of ''Tupaia'' is relatively limited.The young remain in the nest for 33 days on average, developing gradually before they exit the nest. Ten identified embryonic developmental stages are seen in ''Tupaia'' species. Baby treeshrews are sexually immature until about 90 days after birth.
Medical research Their close relationship to primates makes treeshrews important model organisms in human medical research. A study investigating the effects of the Borna disease virus on treeshrews has given new insight into neurological disease.Since ''Tupaia'' species share so many similarities with primates, yet are more abundant and have more plentiful progeny than them, interest is increasing in using them as an alternative model for use in human medical research. Successful psychosocial studies were carried out, and dramatic behavioral, neuroendocrinal, and physiological changes occurred in subordinate males of ''Tupaia'', similar to depressed human patients. Their susceptibility to viruses has also piqued interest in using them to study immune responses to infections such as hepatitis B. ''Tupaia'' species have been used to overcome the limitations of using rodent models in the study of human biology and disease mechanisms, as well as the development of new drugs and diagnostic tools. Recent studies have used treeshrews to study infectious, metabolic, neurological, and psychiatric diseases, as well as cancers.In 2013, the ''Virology Journal'' published an article that documents the use of the northern treeshrew (''T. belangeri'') as medical models for the H1N1 influenza virus. This was advantageous because other possible candidates  such as guinea pigs, rats, mice, and other rodents leave gaps in the information, especially regarding clinical symptoms and transmission. ''Tupaia'', though, displays moderate systemic and respiratory symptoms, as well as pathological changes in the respiratory tract, supporting its use as a beneficial model in H1N1 research.
References